Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:20:25.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - APEC and the TPP

are they mutually reinforcing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

C. L. Lim
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Deborah Kay Elms
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Patrick Low
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement (TPSEP), between Brunei Darussalam, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore, came into force in 2006. This Agreement, which is also known as the P4, was the first preferential trade agreement (PTA) to be comprised of more than two members from both sides of the Pacific Rim.

Article 20.6 of the P4 allows “any APEC Economy or other State” to accede to the Agreement. Within this context, Australia, Peru and the United States launched negotiations in 2008 with the P4 members, while Malaysia and Viet Nam joined fully in the negotiations in 2010. In the course of these negotiations, the approach to extend the P4 switched to negotiating a new PTA, as all parties agreed that existing PTAs in force among any of them would coexist with the new agreement. This process, referred as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations, attempts to achieve a wider PTA in the Pacific Rim.

This process is an attempt to create the largest PTA in the Asia-Pacific region, and is one of the potential paths towards a future Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP). At the present time, all the TPP negotiating parties are APEC members, which if successful, will bring a new PTA with a greater scope in comparison with the P4. The TPP negotiations are already fuelling debate in the public arena due to its multiple economic and political implications at bilateral, regional and multilateral levels. Indeed, APEC is not exempted from this discussion, as its relevance in this new context has been examined from different perspectives.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Trans-Pacific Partnership
A Quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement
, pp. 242 - 259
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APEC Policy Support Unit 2010 Progressing towards the APEC Bogor Goals: Perspectives of the APEC Policy Support UnitSingaporehttp://publications.apec.org/publication-detail.php?pub_id=1083Google Scholar
APEC Secretariat 1993 Seattle Declaration – APEC Leaders Economic Vision StatementSingaporewww.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/1993/1993_aelm.aspxGoogle Scholar
APEC Secretariat 1994 Bogor Declaration – APEC Economic Leaders’ Declaration of Common ResolveSingaporewww.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/1994/1994_aelm.aspxGoogle Scholar
APEC Secretariat 1994 www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Ministerial-Statements/Annual/1994/~/media/Files/MinisterialStatements/Annual/1994/94_amm_non-binding%20investment%20principles.ashx
APEC Secretariat 2004 www.apec.org/Home/Groups/Other-Groups/~/media/D3CEA02503D04FB49D9859EA10D29520.ashx
APEC Secretariat 2005 www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/apec/2005/bogor.pdf
APEC Secretariat 2005 Busan Declaration – Towards One Community: Meet the Challenge, Make the ChangeSingaporewww.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2005/2005_aelm.aspxGoogle Scholar
APEC Secretariat 2008 APEC Committee on Trade and Investment – 2008 Annual Report to MinistersSingaporeAPECGoogle Scholar
APEC Secretariat 2009 APEC Committee on Trade and Investment – 2009 Annual Report to MinistersSingaporeAPEC,Google Scholar
APEC Secretariat 2010 Yokohama Declaration – The Yokohama Vision – Bogor and BeyondSingaporewww.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2010/2010_aelm.aspxGoogle Scholar
Bergsten, F.C. 2007 Morrison, C.E.Pedrosa, E.An APEC Trade Agenda? The Political Economy of a Free Trade Area of the Asia-PacificSingaporeInstitute of Southeast Asian StudiesGoogle Scholar
Reuters, 2011 www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/14/us-apec-canada-tpp-idUSTRE7AC12B20111114
Yamazawa, I. 2009 www.iseas.edu.sg/apec/D1S1S3_Paper_Yamazawa.pdf

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×