Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:12:27.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Ten - The Transnational Legal Ordering of the Death Penalty

from Part IV - Transnational Legal Ordering and Human Rights Standards in Criminal Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

By
Stefanie Neumeier  and
Wayne Sandholtz
Edited by
Gregory Shaffer  and
Ely Aaronson
Gregory Shaffer
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Ely Aaronson
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

A transnational legal ordering (TLO) has emerged and settled since 1945 around capital punishment. In contrast with transnational legal orders in other domains of criminal justice, the death penalty TLO regulates activity that is not transnational but rather national or local. The analysis therefore explains abolition in domestic law, confronting the question of how abolition can occur domestically when publics almost universally favor retention. Two types of domestic institutions can make non-majoritarian death penalty abolition more likely: (1) proportional representation in the legislature and (2) courts that are independent of the political branches. Transnational influences can also enhance the likelihood of abolition, in particular, (1) the incentive of membership in regional organizations, and (2) the persuasive and socializing influence of international non-governmental organizations (INGOs). This chapter offers a novel means of measuring INGO influence and incorporates it in the analysis of data from about 150 countries. The analysis finds that proportional representation electoral systems, country-specific INGO attention, and regional effects increase the likelihood that a country will abolish the death penalty in a given period. Brief case studies illustrate the mechanisms highlighted by the broader analysis, including instances of both abolishers and non-abolishers.

Keywords

death penaltyabolitionhuman rightsinstitutionsInternational organizations.
Type
Chapter
Information
Transnational Legal Ordering of Criminal Justice , pp. 293 - 332
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amnesty International. 2018. Death Sentences and Executions 2017. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare. 2008. On Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Colin J., Meyer, John W., et al. 2017. “Constitutions in World Society: A New Measure of Human Rights.” Unpublished manuscript. January 27, 2017. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2906946 (accessed April 29, 2018).Google Scholar
Boli, John. 1987. “Human Rights or State Expansion? Cross-National Definitions of Constitutional Rights, 1870–1970.” Pp. 71–91 in Institutional Structure, edited by Thomas, George, Meyer, John, Ramirez, Francisco, and Boli, John. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Boli-Bennett, John, and Meyer, John. 1978. “The Ideology of Childhood and the State: Rules Distinguishing Children in National Constitutions, 1870–1970.” American Sociological Review 43(6): 797–812.Google Scholar
Bosse, Giselle, and Vieira, Alena. 2018. “Human Rights in Belarus: The EU’s Role since 2016.” European Parliament Think Tank. www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EXPO_STU%282018%29603870.Google Scholar
Bouckaert, Peter Norbert. 1996. “Shutting Down the Death Factory: The Abolition of Capital Punishment in South Africa.” Stanford Journal of International Law 32(2): 287–325.Google Scholar
Cole, Wade M. 2009. “Hard and Soft Commitments to Human Rights Treaties, 1966–20001.” Sociological Forum 24(3): 563–588.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, et al. 2013. “Getting to Rights: Treaty Ratification, Constitutional Convergence, and Human Rights Practice.” Harvard International Law Journal 54(1): 61–95.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, et al. 2014. “Characteristics of National Constitutions, Version 2.0.” www.comparativeconstitutionsproject.org. (accessed December 28, 2016).Google Scholar
European Commission. 1997a. Agenda 2000: Commission Opinion on Estonia’s Application for Membership of the European Union. July 15, 1997. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/dwn/opinions/estonia/es-op_en.pdf (accessed May 24, 2007).Google Scholar
European Commission. 1997b. Commission Opinion on Bulgaria’s Application for Membership of the European Union. July 15, 1997. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/dwn/opinions/bulgaria/bu-op_en.pdf (accessed May 24, 2007).Google Scholar
European Commission. 1998. 1998 Regular Report from the Commission on Poland’s Progress towards Accession. November 4. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/1998/poland_en.pdf (accessed May 24, 2007).Google Scholar
European Commission. 1999. Composite Paper: Reports on Progress towards Accession by Each of the Candidate Countries: Annex 3. October 13, 1999. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/1999/annex3_en.pdf (accessed May 24, 2007).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2001. Making a Success of Enlargement: Strategy Paper and Report of the European Commission on the Progress towards Accession by Each of the Candidate Countries. November 13, 2001. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2001/annexes_en.pdf (accessed July 9, 2007).Google Scholar
European Council. 1993. European Council in Copenhagen 21–22 June 1993: Conclusions of the Presidency. http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/72921.pdf (accessed May 24, 2007).Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. 1996. Rituals of Retribution: Capital Punishment in Germany 1600–1987. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankowski, Stanislaw. 1996. “Post-Communist Europe.” Pp. 215–241 in Capital Punishment: Global Issues and Prospects, edited by Hodgkinson, Peter and Rutherford, Andrew. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2010. Peculiar Institution : America’s Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie, Blumstein, Alfred, et al. 2006. The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015. “Transnational Legal Orders.” Pp. 3–74 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence C. and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Peter. 2000. “Europe – A Death Penalty Free Zone: Commentary and Critique of Abolitionist Strategies.” Ohio Northern University Law Review 26: 625–663.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Peter, and Rutherford, Andrew. 1996. Capital Punishment: Global Issues and Prospects. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Roger. 2002. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Roger G., and Hoyle, Carolyn. 2008. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Roger, and Hoyle, Carolyn. 2009. “Abolishing the Death Penalty Worldwide: The Impact of a ‘New Dynamic.’” Crime and Justice 38(1): 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Roger, and Hoyle, Carolyn. 2015. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, Shanhe, Lambert, Eric G., et al. 2010. “Death Penalty Views in China, Japan and the U.S.: An Empirical Comparison.” Journal of Criminal Justice 38(5): 862–869.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2014. “Progress and Problems in Japanese Capital Punishment.” Pp. 168–184 in Confronting Capital Punishment in Asia: Human Rights, Politics, and Public Opinion, edited by Hood, Roger and Deva, Surya. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Dongwook. 2016. “International Non-governmental Organizations and the Abolition of the Death Penalty.” European Journal of International Relations 22(3): 596–621.Google Scholar
Law, David S., and Versteeg, Mila. 2011. “The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism.” California Law Review 99: 1163–1257.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, et al. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 144–181.Google Scholar
Neary, Ian. 2002. Human Rights in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2008. “Death Penalty: The Political Foundations of the Global Trend towards Abolition.” Human Rights Review 9(2): 241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obara-Minnitt, Mika. 2016. Japanese Moratorium on the Death Penalty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization of American States. 2018. Signatures and Ratifications: Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights to Abolish the Death Penalty. Department of International Law. www.oas.org/juridico/english/sigs/a-53.html (accessed May 20, 2018).Google Scholar
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. 2003. The Death Penalty in the OSCE Area. October 2003. www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2003/10/771_en.pdf (accessed May 23, 2007).Google Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 1994. Resolution 1044 (1994) on the Abolition of Capital Punishment. http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/AdoptedText/ta96/ERES1097.HTM.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 1996. Resolution 1097 (1996) on the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Europe. http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/AdoptedText/ta96/ERES1097.HTM.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 2000. Opinion No. 221 (2000): Armenia’s Application for Membership of the Council of Europe. June 28. http://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/adoptedtext/ta00/eopi221.htm (accessed May 23, 2007).Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne, and Neumeier, Stefanie. 2019. “The Transnational Legal Ordering of the Death Penalty.” UCI Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law 4.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Martschukat, Jürgen, eds. 2011. Is the Death Penalty Dying? European and American Perspectives. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sato, Mai. 2014. The Death Penalty in Japan: Will the Public Tolerate Abolition? Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. 1997. The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sergeyeva, Viktoria, and Pokras, Alla. 2012. The Abolition of the Death Penalty and Its Alternative Sanction in Eastern Europe: Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. London: Penal Reform International.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah. 2010. Regional Protection of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sloss, David, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 2018. “Universal Human Rights and Constitutional Change.” Manuscript. May 18, 2018. 52 pages.Google Scholar
Stack, Steven. 2004. “Public Opinion and the Death Penalty.” International Criminal Justice Review 14(1): 69–98.Google Scholar
Steiker, Carol S. 2002. “Capital Punishment and American Exceptionalism.” Oregon Law Review 81(1): 97–130.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru, and Wotipka, Christine Min. 2004. “Global Civil Society and the International Human Rights Movement: Citizen Participation in Human Rights International Nongovernmental Organizations.” Social Forces 83(2): 587–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
General Assembly, UN. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Resolution 217 A (III). December 10. www.unhchr.ch/udhr/lang/eng.htm (accessed April 29, 2018).Google Scholar
Unnever, James. 2010. “Global Support for the Death Penalty.” Punishment & Society 12(4): 463–484.Google Scholar
Versteeg, Mila. 2015. “Law versus Norms: The Impact of Human Rights Treaties on National Bills of Rights.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 171(1): 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wotipka, Christine Min, and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2008. “Global Human Rights and State Sovereignty: State Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties, 1965–2001.” Sociological Forum 23(4): 724–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. 2003. The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×