from Background Papers
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2017
In political science as in the real world of politics, the language of “community” evokes both appeal and apprehension. Leaders often use the language of community (or associated metaphors: family, brotherhood, kinship) to woo their constituents, legitimize their mode of governance and mobilize public support for specific policies. Some disparage the notion of community, which they see as a fig leaf for state dominance at the expense of individual autonomy. But if the concept sparks controversy at the domestic level, it arouses disbelief when applied to international relations. Realists, who dominate both the study and practice of international relations, view the international system as anarchic, in which states exist in perpetual fear and mistrust of each other, and where self-help trumps community-help. In constant pursuit of national security, their best hope is for co-existence, rather than collective fulfilment. Other scholars, admittedly less numerous, accept the possibility of community. They not only recognize the existence of community in international relations, but also claim that community-guided behaviour can reshape security perceptions and even create pacific relations among states.
But what is community? A community has two key features. First, it implies a social, rather than purely instrumental, relationship. The key attributes of a community, to use American political scientist Ernst Haas’ words, are “trust, friendship, complementarity, and responsiveness” (Haas 1973, p. 116). Second, a community is not just a group of culturally similar people. While people in communities have cultural and physical attributes in common, they are also people who “display mutual responsiveness, confidence, and esteem, and who self-consciously self-identify” (Puchala 1984, pp. 186–87).
In a classic formulation, Ferdinand Tonnies distinguishes between two kinds of social relationships. The first describes a kinship or a communal relationship (Gemeinschaft). The other refers to an organized, purposive association (Gesellsschaft). The two are different to the extent that a person cannot simply wake up one morning and decide to join a Gemeinschaft. He/she is either born into it or grows into it through an evolutionary process of adaptation and assimilation. Gesellschaft, on the other hand, connotes a voluntary association based on rational self-interest. The process of entering into a Gesellsschaft is akin to signing a contract, which is an instrumental and practical way of achieving one's goals.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.