We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
E. R. Dodds: ‘Our editions of Greek and Latin authors are good enough to live with’; D. R. Shackleton Bailey: ‘Maybe, maybe not; it all depends on one's standard of living’.
In this chapter, I will attempt a brief look forward into the future of editing classical texts. The questions I want to consider are these: What remains to be done in the area of textual criticism and editing? To what extent will traditional editing procedures be affected by new and emerging technology?
I
A natural starting point would be to ask which authors are and are not currently represented in satisfactory editions. ‘Satisfactory’ is a replacement for ‘definitive’, a concept that for reasons previously discussed I do not believe is applicable in this area. But that innocent-seeming question immediately raises another: what constitutes a satisfactory edition? The exchange between Dodds and Shackleton Bailey (even if only ben trovato) shows that eminent scholars can differ on that point. A minimal definition of a satisfactory edition might be one that accurately reports the essential manuscript evidence and reflects the current state of thinking about a text well enough to provide a basis for further study. Acceptable standards of living vary not only from person to person, but across time as well. Even an excellent edition will not remain satisfactory forever; for most authors, a good edition will have a useful lifespan of one or two generations, with fifty years an especially long life. (The obvious exceptions are editions of less-read texts, e.g., the Agrimensores, for which Lachmann's edition of 1848 was for more than 150 years the only critical edition of most of the corpus.)
There are certainly texts for which a new critical edition is not urgently needed. I think primarily of well-studied texts preserved in very few manuscripts or single manuscripts, such as Tacitus’ Annals 1–6 or the Roman history of Velleius Paterculus, or texts with manuscript traditions that lend themselves to stemmatic analysis, such as the biographies of Cornelius Nepos. Even here what is in question is not a ban, but a moratorium.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
