Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:56:21.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2024

Tommaso Spinelli
Tommaso Spinelli
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Statius and Ovid
Poetics, Politics, and Intermediality in the <I>Thebaid</I>
 , pp. 262 - 288
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, G. W. 2005. ‘Suetonius and his treatment of the emperor Domitian’s favourable accomplishments’, Studia Humaniora Tartuensia 3: 1–25.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. M. 1976. Lucan: An Introduction. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. M. 1984. ‘The rider and the horse: politics and power in Roman poetry from Horace to Statius’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 32.1: 40–124.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. M. 1986. ‘Statius’ Thebaid: a reconsideration’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 32.5: 2803–2912.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. M. 2015. ‘Transgressing boundaries of the unthinkable: Sophocles, Ovid, Vergil, Seneca, and Homer refracted in Statius’ Thebaid’, in Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E., and Gervais, K. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Statius (Leiden: Brill), 240–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrete, G. S. 2007. Floods of the Tiber in Ancient Rome. Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, G. 2000. Intertextuality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, J. E., and Cloud, J. D. 1962. ‘The lex Iulia maiestatis’, Latomus 21.4: 711–731.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., Domosh, M., Pile, S., and Thrift, N. (eds.) 2002. Handbook of Cultural Geography. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. C. 1983. ‘A topographical tradition in fourth century chronicles: Domitian’s building program’, Historia 32: 93–105.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1997. Ovid’s Metamorphoses Books 1–5. University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, M. 1999. Landscape and Western Art. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arend, W. 1975. Die Typischen Scenen bei Homer. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Aricò, S. 1960. ‘Sul mito di Lino e Corebo in Stazio, Tebaide 1.557–668’, Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 88: 277–285.Google Scholar
Asso, P. 2009. ‘Hercules as a paradigm of Roman heroism’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Silius Italicus (Leiden: Brill), 177–192.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A. (ed.) 2009. Brill’s Companion to Silius Italicus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A. (ed.) 2010. Motherhood and the Other: Fashioning Female Power in Flavian Epic. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augoustakis, A. (ed.) 2013. ‘Teichoskopia and katabasis. The poetics of spectatorship in Flavian epic’, in Manuwald, G. and Voigt, A. (eds.), Flavian Epic Interactions (Berlin: De Gruyter), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augoustakis, A. (ed.) 2014. Flavian Poetry and Its Greek Past. Leiden & Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augoustakis, A. (ed.) 2015. ‘Statius and Senecan drama’, in Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E., and Gervais, K. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Statius (Leiden: Brill), 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augoustakis, A. (ed.) 2016a. Statius, Thebaid 8: Edited with an Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A. (ed.) 2016b. ‘Flavian epic’, in Lovatt, H. and Augoustakis, A. (eds.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies (Oxford University Press), 388–407.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A., Littlewood, R. J. (eds.) 2019. Campania in the Flavian Poetic Imagination. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azara, P. 2008. ‘Landscape, live nature’, in Maciocco, G. (ed.), Urban Landscape Perspectives (Berlin: Springer), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, T. (ed.) 2001. Valerius Flaccus Argonautica Buch VI: Einleitung und Kommentar. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M. (eds.) 1986. Speech Genres and other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Balbo, A. 2007. I Frammenti degli Oratori Romani dell’Età Augustea e Tiberiana. Parte Seconda. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Bannon, C. J. 1997. ‘The brothers of Romulus’, in Bannon, C. J. (ed.), Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society (Princeton University Press), 138–148.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. and Van den Berg, C. S. 2013. ‘Intertextuality, introduction’, American Journal of Philology 134: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1986. ‘Problemi d’interpretazione in Ovidio: continuità delle storie, continuazione dei testi’, Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici 16: 77–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1997. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (ed.) 2005. Ovidio, Metamorfosi. Vol. I: Libri I–II. Milan: Lorenzo Valla Editore.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., Rosati, G. (eds.) 2005. Ovidio, Metamorfosi. Vol. II (Libri III–IV). Trent: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., Rosati, G. (eds.) 2008. ‘Senatus consultum de Lycaone: concili degli dèi e immaginazione politica nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio’, Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici 61: 117–145.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., Rosati, G. (eds.) 2012. ‘Roma e l’Eneide: impero e cittadanza’, Classici Contro 1: 43–60.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., Rosati, G. (eds.) 2017. ‘Colonial readings in Virgilian geopoetics: the Trojans at Buthrotum’, in Asper, M. and Rimell, V. E. (eds.), Imagining Empire: Political Space in Hellenistic and Roman Literature (Heidelberg: Bibliothek Der Klassischen Altertumswissenschaften), 151–166.Google Scholar
Barrenechea, F. 2010. ‘Didactic aggressions in the Nile excursus of Lucan’s Bellum Civile’, The American Journal of Philology 131: 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, V. K. 1664. P. Papinii Statii quae Exstant. Zwickau: Typis Melchioris Göpneri.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1977. ‘The death of the author’, in Heath, S. (ed.), Image, Music, Text (London: Fontana Press), 142–148.Google Scholar
Bate, J. 2001. The Song of the Earth. London: Picador.Google Scholar
Bate, M. S. 2004. ‘Tempestuous poetry: storms in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Heroides and Tristia’, Mnemosyne 57: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batinski, E. E. 1992. ‘Lucan’s catalogue of Caesar’s troops: paradox and convention’, The Classical Journal 88: 19–24.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. 2006. ‘Provocation: the point of reception theory’, in Martindale, C. and Thomas, R. F. (eds.), Classics and the Uses of Reception (London: John Wiley & Sons), 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. 1998. Religions of Rome: A History. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. Henderson, J. 2001. Classical Art: From Greece to Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, S. 2008. ‘Introduction: role models in the Roman world’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, Supplementary Volumes 7: 1–39.Google Scholar
Berlincourt, V. 2013. Commenter la Thébaïde (16e–19e S.): Caspar von Barth et la tradition exégétique de Stace. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. 2008. In the Image of the Ancestors: Narratives of Kinship in Flavian Epic. Toronto: Phoenix Supplementary Volumes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. 2011. ‘Locus amoenus and locus horridus in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Wenshan Review of Literature and Culture 5.1: 67–98.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. 2013. ‘Ritual murder and suicide in the Thebaid’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.), Ritual and Religion in Flavian Epic (Oxford University Press), 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. 2016. ‘Epic poetry: historicizing the Flavian epics’, in Zissos, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome (Oxford and Malden: John Wiley & Sons), 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersani, P. and Bencivenga, M. 2001. Le Piene del Tevere a Roma dal V Secolo a. C. all’Anno 2000. Rome: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri Servizio Idrografico Nazionale.Google Scholar
Bessone, F. 2006. ‘Un mito da dimenticare: tragedia e memoria epica nella Tebaide’, Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici 56: 93–127.Google Scholar
Bessone, F. 2008. ‘Teseo, la clementia e la punizione dei tiranni: esemplarità e pessimismo nel finale della Tebaide’, Dictynna: https://doi.org/10.4000/dictynna.200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessone, F. 2011. La Tebaide di Stazio. Epica e Potere. Turin: Fabrizio Serra Editore.Google Scholar
Bessone, F. 2013a. ‘Critical interactions’, in Manuwald, G. and Voigt, A. (eds.), Flavian Epic Interactions (Berlin: De Gruyter), 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessone, F. 2013b. ‘Religion and power in the Thebaid’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.), Ritual and Religion in Flavian Epic (Oxford University Press), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biguzzi, G. 2007. Gli Splendori di Patmos. Commento Breve di Apocalisse. Milan: Edizioni Paoline.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. 1973. The Anxiety of Influence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. 2012. Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonz, M. P. 2000. The Past as Legacy: Luke-Acts and Ancient Epic. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. 1986. The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid of Virgil. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A. J. Woodard, R. (eds.) 2000. Ovid Fasti. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. Woodard, R., Dominik, W. J. (eds.) 2003. Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A. J. Woodard, R., Dominik, W. J. (eds.) 2006. Roman Tragedy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brannigan, J. 2016. New Historicism and Cultural Materialism. Melbourne: Macmillan International Higher Education.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M. 1996. ‘Ending epic: Statius, Theseus and a merciful release’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 42: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. M. 1997. ‘Virgil and the cosmos: religious and philosophical ideas’, in Martindale, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil (Cambridge University Press), 204–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. M. 2006. ‘A tale of two cities: Statius, Thebes and Rome’, Phoenix 60: 259–273.Google Scholar
Briguglio, S. 2017. Fraternas Acies: Saggio di Commento a Stazio, Tebaide, 1, 1–389. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Briguglio, S. 2019a. ‘Mira loquor: lo spettacolo (ovidiano) della guerra e l’estetica della morte nella Tebaide di Stazio’, in Battistella, C. and Fucecchi, M. (eds.), Dopo Ovidio. Aspetti dell’Evoluzione del Sistema Letterario nella Roma Imperiale (e Oltre) (Milan: Mimesis), 115–131.Google Scholar
Briguglio, S. 2019b. ‘Ipsipile tra Ovidio e l’epica flavia. Ritratti di signora’, in Bessone, F. and Stroppa, S. (eds.), Lettori Latini e Italiani di Ovidio. Atti del Convegno, Università di Torino, 9–10 Novembre 2017 (Pisa: Fabrizio Serra Editore), 41–49.Google Scholar
Briguglio, S. 2020. La Notte di Argo. Commento a Stazio, Tebaide, 1,390–720. Turin: Edizioni Dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Briguglio, S. 2022. ‘Sediziose voci: paesaggio e guerra civile nella sezione nemea della Tebaide’, Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 64.1: 61–79.Google Scholar
Brown, J. 1994. Into the Woods: Narrative Studies in the Thebaid of Statius with Special Reference to Books IV–VI. Doctoral Diss. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bruhn, J. 2016. The Intermediality of Narrative Literature: Medialities Matter. London: Palgrave Macmillan and Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, E. 2018. ‘Flavian epic and Trajanic historiography’, in König, A., Whitton, C. (eds.), Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions AD 96–138 (Cambridge University Press), 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 1989. Virgil’s Augustan Epic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 2006. ‘Propertius and the origins of Latin love-elegy’, in Günther, H. C. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Propertius (Leiden: Brill), 69–95.Google Scholar
Caldelli, M. L. 1993. Agon Capitolinus: Storia e Protagonisti dall’Istituzione Domizianea al IV Secolo. Rome: Istituto Italiano per la Storia Antica.Google Scholar
Canali, L. and Pellegrini, M. (eds.) 2000. Publio Papinio Stazio: Selve. Locarno: Dado.Google Scholar
Cannadine, D. 1987. ‘Introduction’, in Cannadine, D. and Price, S. (eds.) Rituals of Royalty: Power and Ceremonial in Traditional Societies, (Cambridge University Press), 1–19.Google Scholar
Casali, S. 2011. ‘The Bellum Civile as an anti-Aeneid’, in Asso, P. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Lucan (Leiden: Brill), 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caviglia, F. (ed.) 1973. La Tebaide, Libro I. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Chambers, I. 1994. Migrancy, Culture, Identity. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chandler, T. 2012. ‘Locus amoenus: pastoral atmosphere of Virgil’s Eclogues’, Colloquy 23: 185.Google Scholar
Charles, M. B. and Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. 2010. ‘The sexual hypocrisy of Domitian: Suet. Dom. 8.3’, L’Antiquité classique 79: 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, M. P. 1936. ‘Providentia and aeternitas’, Harvard Theological Review 29: 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, P. 2014. The War with God: Theomachy in Roman imperial Poetry. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, C. 2008. ‘Libertas reverentiam remisit: politics and metaphor in Statius Silvae 1.6’, American Journal of Philology 129.1: 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, C. 2022. Visualizing the Poetry of Statius. An Intertextual Approach. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomse, S. M. 2016. Sublime Structures: Architecture, Instability and Ruins in Virgil, Lucan and Tacitus. Doctoral dissertation. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Chomse, S. M. 2020. ‘Building the sublime emperor in a more vertical Rome’, in Citroni, M., Labate, M., and Rosati, G. (eds.), La Casa, Il Palazzo, La Villa: Luoghi dell’Identità nella Poesia Augustea e della Prima Età Imperiale (Pisa: Edizioni della Normale), 161–184.Google Scholar
Closs, V. 2016. ‘Neronianis temporibus: the so-called arae incendii Neroniani and the fire of AD 64 in Rome’s monumental landscape’, The Journal of Roman Studies 106: 102–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coarelli, F. 2007. Rome and Environs: An Archaeological Guide. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 2012. Palatium. Il Palatino dalle Origini all’Impero. Rome: Edizioni Quasar.Google Scholar
Coffee, N. 2009. ‘Statius’ Theseus: martial or merciful?’, Classical Philology 104: 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, N. Koenig, J. P., Poornima, S., Ossewaarde, R., Forstall, C., and Jacobson, S. 2012. ‘Intertextuality in the digital age’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 142: 383–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, N. Koenig, J. P., Poornima, S., Ossewaarde, R., Forstall, C., and Jacobson, S. 2018. ‘An agenda for the study of intertextuality’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 148.1: 205–223.Google Scholar
Coffee, N. Koenig, J. P., Poornima, S., Ossewaarde, R., Forstall, C., and Jacobson, S. Forstall, C., Milic Galli, L., Nelis, D. (eds.) 2020. Intertextuality in Flavian Epic Poetry: Contemporary Approaches. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (ed.) 1988. Statius. Silvae IV. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (ed.) 2006. Liber Spectaculorum M. Valerii Martialis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. 2016. The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1974. Memoria dei Poeti e Sistema Letterario: Catullo. Virgilio, Ovidio, Lucano. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1994. Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1997. ‘Die Literatur der Kaiserzeit’, in Graf, F. (ed.), Einleitung in die lateinische Philologie (Stuttgart and Leipzig: Teubner), 226–297.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (ed.) 2005. P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis. Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Criado, C. 2000. ‘La teología de la Tebaida estaciana. El anti-virgilianismo de un clasicista’, Spudasmata 75: 3–267.Google Scholar
Criado, C. 2013. ‘The contradictions of Valerius’ and Statius’ Jupiter’, in Manuwald, G. and Voigt, A. (eds.) Flavian Epic Interactions (Berlin: De Gruyter), 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criado, C. 2015. ‘The constitutional status of Euripidean and Statian Theseus: some aspects of the criticism of absolute power in the Thebaid’, in Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E., and Gervais, K. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Statius (Leiden: Brill), 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, D. 2013. Tragedy in Ovid: Theater, Metatheater, and the Transformation of a Genre. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, C. 2010. ‘The Historian’s presence, or, there and back again’, in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford University Press), 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dart, J. 2016. ‘Centers and peripheries’, in Zissos, A. (ed.) A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome (Oxford/Malden: John Wiley & Sons), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall-Smith, R. 1996. Emperors and Architecture: A Study of Flavian Rome. Brussels: Collection Latomus.Google Scholar
Davis, P. J. 1994. ‘The fabric of history in Statius’ Thebaid’, Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 7: 464–483.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2012. ‘Narratological theory on space’, in De Jong, I. J. F. (ed.), Space in Ancient Greek Literature (Leiden: Brill), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. 1990. Tra Ovidio e Seneca. Florence: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Degrassi, A. 1952. I Fasti Consolari dell’Impero Romano. University of Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Delarue, F. 2000. Stace, poète épique. Originalité et cohérence. Paris and Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1966. Le théâtre de la cruauté et la clôture de la représentation. Paris: Éd. de Minuit.Google Scholar
Dewar, M. (ed.) 1991. Statius. Thebaid IX. Edited with an English Translation and Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. 2013. ‘Intermediality in Latin epic: en video quaecumque audita’, in Lovatt, H. and Vout, C. (eds.), Epic Visions: Visuality in Greek and Latin Epic and its Reception (Cambridge University Press), 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinter, M. 2019. ‘Intermediality in the Metamorphoses’, Trends in Classics 11: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domingo, J. Á., Mar, R., and Pensabene, P. 2013. ‘El complejo arquitectónico del templo del divo Claudio en el monte Celio de Roma’, Archeologia Classica 64: 295–348.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J. 1990. ‘Monarchical power and imperial politics in Statius’ Thebaid’, in Boyle, A. J. (ed.), The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, II: Flavian Epicist to Claudian (Bendigo: Aureal Publications), 74–97.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J. 1994. The Mythic Voice of Statius: Power and Politics in the Thebaid. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominik, W. J. Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. (eds.) 2009. Writing Politics in Imperial Rome. New York, Paris, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominik, W. J. Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. (eds.) 2009. ‘Vergil’s geopolitics’, in Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. (eds.), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome (New York, Paris, Leiden: Brill), 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominik, W. J. Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. (eds.) 2012. ‘Critiquing the Critics: Jupiter, the Gods and Free Will in Statius’ Thebaid’, in Baier, T. (ed.), Götter und Menschliche Willensfreiheit: Von Lucan bis Silius Italicus (Munich: C. H. Beck), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Due, O. S. 1974. Changing Forms: Studies in the Metamorphoses of Ovid. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Dueck, D. 2000. ‘Historical exempla in Augustan Rome and their role in a geographical context’, Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 10: 176–196.Google Scholar
Dunsch, B. 2014. ‘Describe nunc tempestatem: sea storm and shipwreck type scenes in ancient literature’, in Thompson, C. (ed.), Shipwreck in Art and Literature: Images and Interpretations from Antiquity to the Present Day (Abingdon: Routledge), 56–73.Google Scholar
Econimo, F. 2020. ‘Ipsipile e la riscrittura di Ov. Her. 6: un gioco di triangolazione’, in Poignault, R. and Vial, H. (eds.), Présences ovidiennes (Clermont-Ferrand: Centre de Recherches sur les Littératures et la Sociopoétique), 171–191.Google Scholar
Econimo, F. 2021. La Parola e gli Occhi. L’Ekphrasis nella Tebaide di Stazio. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, R. J. and Stem, R. 2005. ‘The silence of Vergil and the end of the Aeneid’, Vergilius 51: 3–11.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1992. ‘Homer and oral tradition: the type-scene’, Oral Tradition 7: 284–330.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. 2013. Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, J. 1996. ‘Inventing imperium: texts and the propaganda of monuments in Augustan Rome’, in Elsner, J. and Bryson, N. (eds.), Art and Text in Roman Culture (Cambridge University Press), 32–54.Google Scholar
Esposito, P. 2004. ‘Lucano e la negazione per antitesi’, in Esposito, P. and Ariemma, E. M. (eds.) Lucano e la Tradizione dell’Epica Latina (Naples: Guida), 39–67.Google Scholar
Estèves, A. 2005. ‘Color épique et color tragique dans la Thébaïde de Stace: récits de nefas et stratégies narratives (viii, 751–765 et xi, 524–579)’, Latomus 64: 96–120.Google Scholar
Evans, R. 2003. ‘Searching for paradise: landscape, utopia, and Rome’, Arethusa 33: 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. 2007. Utopia Antiqua: Readings of the Golden Age and Decline at Rome. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faber, R. A. 2006. ‘The description of Crenaeus’ shield in Thebaid IX, 332–338 and the theme of divine deception’, Latomus 65.1: 108–114.Google Scholar
Falcone, M. J. 2011. ‘Nostrae fatum excusabile culpae. From Ovidian elegiac model to Hypsipyle by Statius’, Athenaeum 99: 491–498.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1972. Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 2004. Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Favro, D. G. 1996. The Urban Image of Augustan Rome. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fears, J. R. 1981. ‘The cult of Jupiter and Roman imperial ideology’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 17.1: 3–141.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1984. ‘The reconciliations of Juno’, Classical Quarterly 34: 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1986. ‘Epic hero and epic fable’, Comparative Literature 38: 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1999. ‘Mea tempora: patterning of time in the Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, P. R., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. (eds.), Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Its Reception (Cambridge University Press), 13–30.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 2007. ‘The history of Roman religion in Roman historiography and epic’, in Rüpke, J. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Religion (Oxford: John Wiley & Sons), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1997. ‘Metamorphosis and sacrifice in Ovid’s Theban narrative’, Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici 38: 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. 2010. Playing Gods: Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Politics of Fiction. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Filippi, F. 2015. Campo Marzio. Nuove Ricerche. Atti del Seminario di Studi sul Campo Marzio 18–19 Marzo 2013. Rome: Museo Nazionale Romano Palazzo Altemps.Google Scholar
Fish, S. E. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2006. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fontenrose, J. E. 1959. Python: A Study of Delphic Myth and Its Origins. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. 1997. ‘On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and classical studies’, Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici 39: 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franchet d’Espèrey, S. 1983. ‘Le destin dans les épopées de Lucain et de Stace’, in Jouan, F. (ed.), Visages du destin dans les mythologies: mélanges Jacqueline Duchemin (Paris: Les Belles lettres), 95–104.Google Scholar
Franchet d’Espèrey, S. 1999. Conflit, violence et non-violence dans la Thébaïde de Stace. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fratantuono, L. 2011. Madness Transformed: A Reading of Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Lanham and Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Fratantuono, L. 2015. ‘Graviter commotus: Neptune in the Aeneid’, Classics Faculty Work 11: 130–148.Google Scholar
Fredrick, D. 2003. ‘Architecture and surveillance in Flavian Rome’, in Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J. (eds.), Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text (Leiden: Brill), 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, S. J. 2001. Imperial Cults and the Apocalypse of John: Reading Revelation in the Ruins. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, S. J. 2005. ‘Satan’s throne, imperial cults and the social settings of Revelation’, Journal for the Study of the New Testament 27: 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fucecchi, M. 1999. ‘La vigilia di Canne nei Punica e un contributo alla storia dei rapport fra Silio Italico e Lucano’, in Esposito, P. and Nicastri, S. (eds.), Interpretare Lucano. Miscellanea di studi. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità (Università degli Studi di Salerno), 305–342.Google Scholar
Fucecchi, M. 2013. ‘Looking for the giants: mythological imagery and discourse on power in Flavian epic’, in Manuwald, G. and Voigt, A. (eds.), Flavian epic interactions (Berlin: De Gruyter), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulkerson, L. and Stover, T. (eds.) 2016. Repeat Performances: Ovidian Repetition and the Metamorphoses. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. F. 2005. Ovid, Epistulae ex Ponto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galasso, L. 2008. Ovidio: Epistulae ex Ponto. Milan: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Galimberti, A. 2016. ‘The emperor Domitian’, in Zissos, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome (Oxford/Malden: John Wiley & Sons), 92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. 1966. ‘The Hercules-Cacus Episode in Aeneid VIII’. American Journal of Philology, 87: 18–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. 1972. The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. 1990. ‘Hercules in the Aeneid’, in Duncan, F. K. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid (Oxford University Press), 277–294.Google Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. 1999. ‘Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Augustan Cultural Thematics’, in Hardie, P. R., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. (eds.), Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Its Reception (Cambridge University Press), 103–111.Google Scholar
Gallia, A. B. 2016. ‘Remaking Rome’, in Zissos, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome (Oxford and Malden: John Wiley & Sons), 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganiban, R. T. 2007. Statius and Virgil: The Thebaid and the Reinterpretation of the Aeneid. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganiban, R. T. 2011. ‘Crime in Lucan and Statius’, in Ganiban, R. and Asso, P. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Lucan (Leiden: Brill), 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganiban, R. T. 2014. ‘Virgilian prophecy and the reign of Jupiter in Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica’, in Heerink, M. and Manuwald, G. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Valerius Flaccus (Leiden: Brill), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, D. 1992. ‘The locus inamoenus: another part of the forest’, Arion 2: 9–114.Google Scholar
Gering, J. 2012. Domitian, Dominus et Deus? Herrschafts und Machtstrukturen im Römischen Reich zur Zeit des Letzten Flaviers. Osnabrücker Forschungen zu Altertum und Antike-Rezeption 15. Rahden: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Gervais, K. 2013. ‘Viewing violence in Statius’ Thebaid and the films of Quentin Tarantino’, in Lovatt, H. and Vout, C. (eds.), Epic Visions: Visuality in Greek and Latin Epic and Its Reception (Cambridge University Press), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, K. 2015. ‘Tydeus the hero? Intertextual confusion in Statius, Thebaid 2’, Phoenix 69: 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, K. (ed.) 2017. Statius, Thebaid 2: Edited with an Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getty, R. J. 1950. ‘Romulus, Roma, and Augustus in the sixth book of the Aeneid’, Classical Philology 45: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, B. (ed.) 2006. Statius: Silvae 5. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K., Morello, R. (eds.) 2012. Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilhuly, K. and Worman, N. (eds.) 2014. Space, Place, and Landscape in Ancient Greek Literature and Culture. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godzich, T. N. 2014. Politicizing Apollo: Ovid’s Commentary on Augustan Marriage Legislation in the Ars Amatoria and the Metamorphoses. Claremont: Scripps Senior Theses.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1991. The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gołyźniak, P. 2020. Engraved Gems and Propaganda in the Roman Republic and under Augustus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gorman, V. B. 2001. ‘Lucan’s epic Aristeia and the hero of the Bellum Civile’, The Classical Journal 96: 263–290.Google Scholar
Gossage, A. J. 1969. ‘Virgil and the Flavian epic in Virgil’, in Dudley, D. R. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature (London: Routledge), 80–95.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. 2005. Empire and Memory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregori, G. L. 2017. ‘Traiano e la cura dell’alveo e delle rive del Tevere’, in Traiano. Costruire l’Impero, creare l’Europa (Catalogo della Mostra), 207–209. Rome: De Luca Editore.Google Scholar
Gregori, G. L. Bianchini, G. 2017. ‘Tra epigrafia, letteratura e filologia. Due inedite meditazioni sulla vita e sulla morte incise sull’ossario di Cresto’, in Dondin-Payre, M. and Tran, N. (eds.), Esclaves et maîtres dans le monde romain: expressions épigraphiques de leurs relations (École française de Rome), 141–159.Google Scholar
Gregori, G. L. Bianchini, G. Almagno, G. and Spinelli, T. (eds.) 2019. Roman Calendars: Imperial Birthdays, Victories and Triumphs. Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. 2000. ‘The Flavians’, in Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P., and Rathbone, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, 11: 1–83. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gros, P. 1976. Aurea Templa. Recherches sur l’architecture religieuse de Rome à l’époque d’Auguste. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Guglielminetti, E. 2001. Metamorfosi nell’Immobilità (Vol. 541). Rome: Jaca Book.Google Scholar
Guillemin, A. 1951. ‘L’inspiration virgilienne dans la Pharsale’. Revue des études latines, 29: 204–217.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. 2001. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. Schiesaro, A. (eds.) 1998. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 1983. Before Pastoral: Theocritus and the Ancient Tradition of Bucolic Poetry. Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, I. L. 2008. ‘Muses as models: learning and the complicity of authority’. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome (Supplementary Volumes), 7: 273–285.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1990. ‘Ovid’s Theban history: the first “anti-Aeneid”?’, Classical Quarterly 40: 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1992. ‘Augustan poets and the mutability of Rome’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus (Bristol Classical Press), 59–82.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1997. ‘Closure in classical epic’, in Roberts, D. H. (ed.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature (Princeton University Press), 139–162.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1998. Virgil: Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2002a. Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (ed.) 2002b. The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (ed.) 2006. ‘Statius’ Ovidian poetics and the tree of Atedius Melior (Silvae 3.3)’, in Nauta, R. R., Van Dam, H. J., and Smolenaars, J. J. (eds.), Flavian Poetry (Leiden: Brill), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (ed.) 2011. ‘Lucan in the English Renaissance’, in Asso, P. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Lucan (Leiden: Brill), 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (ed.) 2014. The Last Trojan Hero: A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, J. 2018. ‘Saturninus the helmsman, Pliny and friends’, in König, A. and Whitton, C. (eds.), Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions AD 96–138 (Cambridge University Press), 260–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, B. F. 1979. ‘Domitian, the emperor cult and revelation’, Prudentia 11: 15–26.Google Scholar
Harris, W. 1991. Ancient Literacy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1988. ‘Vergil on kingship: the first simile of the Aeneid’, The Cambridge Classical Journal 34: 55–59.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (ed.) 1991. Aeneid 10. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (ed.) 1992. ‘The arms of Capaneus: Statius’ Thebaid 4.165–77’, Classical Quarterly 42: 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (ed.) 2013. ‘Proleptic ekphrasis in Flavian epic: Valerius Flaccus and Statius’, in Manuwald, G. and Voigt, A. (eds.), Flavian Epic Interactions (Berlin: De Gruyter), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, H. 2003. The History of Make-Believe: Tacitus on Imperial Rome. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. 1963. Preface to Plato. Vol. 1. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. 1991. ‘Diana’s understanding of Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, The Classical Journal 86: 233–243.Google Scholar
Heerink, M. and Manuwald, G. (eds.) 2014. Brill’s Companion to Valerius Flaccus. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, A. 1999. ‘Longa retro series: sacrifice and repetition in Statius’ Menoeceus episode’, Arethusa 32: 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hejduk, J. 2020. The God of Rome: Jupiter in Augustan Poetry. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekster, O. 2004. ‘The constraints of tradition: depictions of Hercules in Augustus’ reign’, in Roman, C. (ed.), Orbis Antiquus: Studia in Honorem Ioannis Pisonis (Cluj-Napoca: Nereamia Napocae Press), 235–248.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 1987. ‘Lucan: the word at war’, Ramus 16: 122–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. 1998. Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henriksen, C. 2012. A Commentary on Martial, Epigrams Book 9. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henrington, C. J. 1955. Athena Parthenos and Athena Polias: A Study in the Religion of Periclean Athens. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. 1998a. The Madness of Epic. Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. 1998b. Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica: Abbreviated Voyages in Silver Latin Epic. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslin, P. J. 2005. The Transvestite Achilles: Gender and Genre in Statius’ Achilleid. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslin, P. J. 2008. ‘Statius and the Greek tragedians on Athens, Thebes and Rome’, in Nauta, R. R., Van Dam, H. J., and Smolenaars, J. J. L. (eds.) The Poetry of Statius (Leiden: Brill), 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuvel, H. 1932. Publii Papinii Statii Thebaidos Liber 1, Versione Batava Commentarioque Exegetico Instructus. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Hill, D. E. 1990. ‘Statius’ Thebaid: a glimmer of light in a sea of darkness’, Ramus 18: 98–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D. E. (ed.) 1996. P. Papini Stati Thebaidos Libri XII. New York: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D. E. (ed.) 2008a. ‘Statius’ debt to Virgil’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 26: 52–65.Google Scholar
Hill, D. E. (ed.) 2008b. ‘Jupiter in Thebaid 1 again’, in Nauta, R. R., Van Dam, H. J., and Smolenaars, J. J. L. (eds.), The Poetry of Statius (Leiden: Brill), 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S. 1987. The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1992. ‘Arma in Ovid’s Fasti: genre and mannerism’, Arethusa 25: 81–112.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 2002. ‘Landscape with figures: aesthetics of place in the Metamorphoses and its tradition’, in Hardie, P. R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ovid (Cambridge University Press), 22–49.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 2011. ‘Seneca’s Ovidian Loci’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 9: 5–63.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. 1996. ‘Traces of ancient commentaries on Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Cairns, F. and Heath, M. (eds.), Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 9 (Leeds: Francis Cairns), 159–174.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 2009. ‘Rilievi provenienti da monumenti statali del tempo dei Flavi’, in Coarelli, F. (ed.), Divus Vespasianus: il bimillenario dei Flavi (Milan: Electa), 46–61.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1999. ‘Apollo’s erste Liebe und die Folgen: Ovid’s Daphne-Erzählung als Programm für Werk und Wirkung’, Gymnasium 106: 317–334.Google Scholar
Howell, P. 1980. A Commentary on Book One of the Epigrams of Martial. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Hulls, J. M. 2007. The Role of Kingship in Statius’ Thebaid. Doctoral Dissertation. University College London.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F. 2016. ‘Sources and Evidence’, in Zissos, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome (Oxford: John Wiley & Sons), 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huskinson, J. 2000. Experiencing Rome: Culture, Identity and Power in the Roman Empire. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Isaac, B. 1990. The Limits of Empire: The Roman Empire in the East. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. 2010. ‘From Sallust to Silius Italicus: from metus hostilis to the fall of Rome in the Punica’, in Miller, J. and Woodman, A. (eds.), Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions (Leiden: Brill), 123–140.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1997. ‘Martial and Domitian’s moral reforms’, Prudentia 29: 24–70.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. 2010. Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. W. 1984. The Emperor Titus. Sydney: Lawbook Company.Google Scholar
Jones, B. W. 1992. The Emperor Domitian. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, T. 2012. Tacitus the Epic Successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the Narrative of Civil War in the Histories. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juhnke, H. 1972. Homerisches in Römischer Epik Flavischer Zeit. Untersuchung zu Szenennachbildungen und Strukturentsprechungen in Statius’ Thebais und Achilleis und in Silius’ Punica. München: C. H. Becksche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Kabsch, E. 1968. Funktion und Stellung des zwölften Buches der Thebais des P. Statius. Kiel.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, H. 2015. ‘Papinius noster: Statius in Roman late antiquity’, in Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E., and Gervais, K. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Statius. (Leiden: Brill), 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. 1999. ‘Versions of epic masculinity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Hinds, S., Hardie, P. R., and Barchiesi, A. (eds.) Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and its Reception (Cambridge Philological Society), 214–239.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2000. Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2002a. ‘Ovidian personae in Statius’s Thebaid’, Arethusa 35: 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2002b. ‘Ovid on Vergilian war narrative’, Vergilius 48: 105–122.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2004. ‘Ovid’s Theban narrative in Statius’ Thebaid’, Hermathena 177/178: 181–207.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2007. ‘Imperial building projects and architectural ecphrases in Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Statius’ Thebaid’, Mouseion 7.1: 1–26.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2011. ‘Ovid in Lucan: the poetics of instability’, in Asso, P. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Lucan (Leiden, Boston: Brill), 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2013a. ‘Medusa, Python, and Poine in Argive religious ritual’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.), Ritual and Religion in Flavian Epic (Oxford University Press), 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2013b. ‘Ovidian Geographies in Flavian Mythological Epic’, in Skempis, M. and Ziogas, I. (eds.), Geography, Topography, Landscape (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 349–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2014. ‘Poetae Ovidiani’, in Miller, J. F. and Newlands, C. E. (eds.), A Handbook to the Reception of Ovid (Malden: Wiley-Blackwell), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2016. ‘Ovid’s Theban Narrative in Statius’ Thebaid’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Flavian Epic (Oxford University Press), 149–169.Google Scholar
Klaassen, E. K. 2010. ‘Imitation and the hero’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Silius Italicus (Leiden: Brill), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, P. E. (ed.) 2009. A Companion to Ovid. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, P. E. (ed.) 2014. ‘Ovidian myths on Pompeian walls’, in Miller, J. F. and Newlands, C. E. (eds.), A Handbook to the Reception of Ovid (Malden: John Wiley & Sons), 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, A. and Whitton, C. (eds.) 2018. Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions AD 96–138. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, A. and Whitton, C., Langlands, R. and Uden, J. (eds.) 2020. Literature and Culture in the Roman Empire AD 96–235: Cross-Cultural Interactions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, N. and Reitz, C. (eds.) 2010. Tradition und Erneuerung: Mediale Strategien in der Zeit der Flavier. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 285. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C. S. 2005. ‘From Exempla to Exemplar? Writing History around the Emperor in Imperial Rome’, in Edmondson, J., Mason, S., and Rives, J. (eds.), Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome (Oxford University Press), 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, J. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. 1986. ‘Word, dialogue, a novel’, in Moi, T. (ed.), The Kristeva Reader (Columbia University Press), 34–61.Google Scholar
Kyriakidis, S. 2019. ‘Deflexus solito cursu: Phaethon between Ovid and Manilius’, Myrtia 33: 109–153.Google Scholar
Lamp, K. S. 2013. A City of Marble: The Rhetoric of Augustan Rome. University of South Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, R. 2018. ‘Literary interactions with oral culture and exemplary ethics’, in König, A. and Whitton, C. (eds.), Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions AD 96–138 (Cambridge University Press), 330–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapidge, M. 1979. ‘Lucan’s imagery of cosmic dissolution’, Hermes 107: 344–370.Google Scholar
Latte, K. 1960. Römische Religionsgeschichte. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. 2018. ‘Pliny Epistles 10 and imperial correspondence’, in König, A. and Whitton, C. (eds.), Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions AD 96–138 (Cambridge University Press), 280–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1974. Virgil’s Eclogues. Landscapes of Experience. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1988. The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Legras, L. 1905. Étude sur la Thébaïde de Stace. Paris: Société nouvelle de librairie et d’édition.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 1999. ‘Lucan’s Caesar and the sacred wood: deforestation and enlightenment in antiquity’, in Esposito, P. and Nicastri, L. (eds.), Interpretare Lucano: Miscellanea di Studi (Naples: Arte Tipografica), 167–205.Google Scholar
Levick, B. 1999. Vespasian. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, C. A. J. 2004. Self-Representation and Illusion in Senecan Tragedy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, C. A. J. (ed.) 2011. A Commentary on Silius Italicus’ Punica 7. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lonardi, A. 2013. La Cura Riparum et Alvei Tiberis: Storiografia, Prosopografia e Fonti Epigrafiche. Rome: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotman, I. M. 2001. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London, New York: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
Lovatt, H. 1999. ‘Competing endings: re-reading the end of Statius’ Thebaid through Lucan’, Ramus 28: 126–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovatt, H. 2005. Statius and Epic Games: Sport, Politics, and Poetics in the Thebaid. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovatt, H. 2013. The Epic Gaze: Vision, Gender and Narrative in Ancient Epic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovatt, H. 2020. ‘Meanwhile back at the ranch: narrative transition and structural intertextuality in Statius’ Thebaid 1’, in Coffee, N., Forstall, C., and Milić, L. G. (eds.), Intertextuality in Flavian Epic Poetry (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter), 21–42.Google Scholar
Lowe, D. 2015. Monsters and Monstrosity in Augustan Poetry. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. 1997. Horace’s Narrative Odes. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, G. 2017. ‘A Textual Commentary on Ovid, Metamorphoses, Book XV’, Journal of Classical Philology Vol. 8. Publications of the Universidad de Huelva.Google Scholar
Luttwak, E. 1976. The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, W. L. 1982. The Architecture of the Roman Empire: An Introductory Study. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Manioti, N. (ed.) 2016. Family in Flavian Epic. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manolaraki, E. 2008. ‘Political and rhetorical seascapes in Pliny’s Panegyricus’, Classical Philology 103: 374–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuwald, G. and Voigt, A. (eds.) 2013. Flavian Epic Interactions. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcattili, F. 2013. ‘Il Divorum, l’Aedes Divorum in Palatio e il Caesareum degli Arvali: tetrastyla, epula e culto dinastico in età flavia’, Bollettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 114: 47–62.Google Scholar
Marcello, F. 2017. ‘Triumph, power and providence in Roman town planning: the golden age of Flavian Rome’, in Martin-McAuliffe, S. L., and Millette, D. M. (eds.), Ancient Urban Planning in the Mediterranean (Abingdon: Routledge), 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchesi, I. 2018. ‘The Regulus connection’, in König, A. and Whitton, C. (eds.), Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions AD 96–138 (Cambridge University Press), 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinis, A. 2015. ‘Statius’ Thebaid and Greek tragedy: the legacy of Thebes’, in Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E., and Gervais, K. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Statius (Leiden: Brill), 343–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, R. 2005. From Republic to Empire: Scipio Africanus in the Punica of Silius Italicus. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Markus, D. D. 2000. ‘Performing the book: the recital of epic in first-century CE Rome’, Classical Antiquity 19: 138–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, D. D. 2003. ‘The politics of epic performance in Statius’. In Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J. (eds.), Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text (Leiden: Brill), 431–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. M. 1982. Providentia Deorum. Recherches sur certains aspects religieux du pouvoir impérial romain. École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. 1997. ‘Green politics: the Eclogues’, in Martindale, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil (Cambridge University Press), 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, S. 2003. Josephus and the New Testament. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Masters, J. 1992. Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEwen, I. K. 2003. Vitruvius: Writing the Body of Architecture. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, M. M. 2009. Ovid in Exile: Power and Poetic Redress in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, D. T. 1995. ‘History compressed: The Roman names of Silius’ Cannae episode’, Latomus, 54: 110–118.Google Scholar
McGuire, D. T. 1997. Acts of Silence: Civil War, Tyranny, and Suicide in the Flavian Epics. Hildesheim and New York: Altertumswissenschaftliche Texte und Studien 33.Google Scholar
McNelis, C. 2007. Statius’ Thebaid and the Poetics of Civil War. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micozzi, L. 2004. ‘Memoria diffusa di luoghi lucanei nella Tebaide di Stazio’. In Esposito, P. and Ariemma, E. S. (eds.), Lucano e la Tradizione dell’Epica Latina, 153–191. Naples: Guida.Google Scholar
Micozzi, L. 2007. Il Catalogo degli Eroi. Saggio di Commento a Stazio Tebaide 4.1–344. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.Google Scholar
Miles, G. B. 1997. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, F. 2005. ‘Last year in Jerusalem: monuments of the Jewish war in Rome’. In Edmonson, J., Mason, S., and Rives, J. (eds.), Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome (Oxford University Press), 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F. 2009. Apollo, Augustus, and the Poets. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. 2005. Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. 2014. Graffiti and the Literary Landscape in Roman Pompeii. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miniero, P. (ed.) 2000. The Sacellum of the Augustales at Miseno: Archaeological Museum of the Phlegraean Fields in the Castle of Baia. Naples: Electa.Google Scholar
Monaca, M. 2002. La Sibilla a Roma: I Libri Sibillini fra Religione e Politica. Cosenza: Edizioni Giordano.Google Scholar
Morford, M. P. 1967. The Poet Lucan: Studies in Rhetorical Epic. London: Duckworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 1998. ‘Assimilation and civil war: Hercules and Cacus. Aeneid 8’. In Stahl, H. P. (ed.), Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context (Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales), 175–197.Google Scholar
Morzadec, F. 2009. Les images du monde. Structure, écriture et esthétique du paysage dans les oeuvres de Stace et Silius Italicus. Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar
Moulder, H. M. (ed.) 1954. Publii Papinii Statii Thebaidos: Liber Secundus Commentario Exegetico Aesthetique Instructus. Groningen: De Waal.Google Scholar
Mozley, J. H. 1928. Statius. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. 1995. ‘The sea of love’, Classical Quarterly 45: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murison, C. L. 2016. ‘The emperor Titus’, in Zissos, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome (Edinburgh: Wiley-Blackwell), 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, K. S. 1994. Ovid’s Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, K. S. 2000. ‘Miranda fides: poet and patrons in paradoxographical landscapes in Statius’ Silvae’, Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici 44: 103–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, M. Y. 2011. ‘Lucan’s poetic geographies: centre and periphery in civil war epic’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Lucan (Leiden: Brill), 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiden, F. S. 2003. ‘Supplication on Roman coins’, American Journal of Numismatics 15.3: 41–52.Google Scholar
Najbjerg, T. 2007. ‘From art to archaeology: recontextualizing the images from the porticus of Herculaneum’, in Gardner-Coates, C. V. and Seydl, J. L. (eds.), Antiquity Recovered: The Legacy of Pompeii and Herculaneum (Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum), 59–72.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. 2002. Lucano: Un’Epica contro l’Impero: Interpretazione della Pharsalia. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. 2002. Poetry for Patrons: Literary Communication in the Age of Domitian. Leiden: Mnemosyne Suppl. 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. 2016. ‘Hercules and Apollo in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A., and Vergados, A. (eds.), The Reception of the Homeric Hymns (Oxford University Press), 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newby, Z. L. (ed.) 2007. Art and Inscriptions in the Ancient World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. L. (ed.) 2014. ‘Poems in stone: reading mythological sarcophagi through Statius’ consolations’, in Elsner, J. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture (Cambridge University Press), 256–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. E. 1984. The Transformation of the Locus Amoenus in Roman Poetry. Dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. E. 1991. ‘Statius’ Poetic Temple: Silvae 3.1’, Classical Quarterly 41: 438–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. E. 2002. Statius’ Silvae and the Poetics of Empire. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. E. 2004. ‘Statius and Ovid: transforming the landscape’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 134: 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. E. 2009. ‘Statius’ self-conscious poetics: hexameter on hexameter’, in Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. A. (eds.), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome (Leiden: Brill), 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. E. 2012. Statius, Poet between Rome and Naples. Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. 2001. ‘The communication of the emperor’s virtues’, Journal of Roman Studies 91: 146–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, N. J. 2009. ‘Imperial triumph and apotheosis: the Arch of Titus in Rome’, in Counts, A. and Tuck, S. (eds.), Koine: Mediterranean Studies in Honour of R. Ross, 41–53. Oxford and Oakville: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. 1996. ‘Statius’ Hypsipyle: following in the footsteps of the Aeneid’, Scholia 5: 46–71.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. 1980. Roman Literature and Society. London: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. 2006. ‘Intertextuality, time and historical understanding’, in Macfie, A. L. (ed.), The Philosophy of History: Talks Given at the Institute of Historical Research (London: Palgrave-Macmillan), 116–137.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. 2009. ‘Intertextuality and historiography’, in Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians (Princeton University Press), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Gorman, E. 2014. ‘Intertextuality, ideology, and truth: re-reading Kristeva through Roman historiography’, Histos 8: 1–9.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. 1990. Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. 1994. ‘They might be giants: inconsistency and indeterminacy in Vergil’s war in Italy’, Colby Quarterly 30.3: 206–226.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. 2007. Inconsistency in Roman epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, M. 2003. Intertextuality: Debates and Contexts. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Packer, J. E. 2003. ‘Plurima et amplissima opera: praising Flavian Rome’. In Boyle, J. and Anthony, A. (eds.), Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text (Leiden: Brill), 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, M. E. 2019. ‘Inscriptional Intermediality in Livy’, Trends in Classics 11: 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paluzzi, C. G. (ed.) 1939. Atti del V Congresso Nazionale di Studi Romani. Vol. 2. Rome: Istituto Nazionale di Studi Romani.Google Scholar
Panagiotidou, M. E. 2012. ‘An introduction to the semantics of intertextuality’, Journal of Literary Semantics 41: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panciera, S. 2006. Epigrafi, Epigrafia, Epigrafisti. Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. 2014. ‘Reading Rome from the farther shore: Aeneid 6 in the Augustan urban landscape’, Vergilius 60: 85–116.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. 2012. ‘Landscape architecture on pastoral topography in Lucan’s Bellum Civile’, Trends in Classics 4.1: 73–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paratore, E. 1950. Storia della Letteratura Latina. Rome: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Parkes, R. 2009. ‘Hercules and the Centaurs: reading Statius with Vergil and Ovid’, Classical Philology 104: 476–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, R. 2010. ‘Dealing with ghosts: literary assertion in Statius’ Thebaid’, Ramus 39.1: 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, R. (ed.) 2012. Statius Thebaid 4. Edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parkes, R. (ed.) 2013. ‘The long road to Thebes’, in Skempis, M. and Ziogas, I. (eds.), Geography, Topography, Landscape: Configurations of Space in Greek and Roman Epic (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, R. (ed.) 2014. ‘The “Argonautic” expedition of the Argives: models of heroism in Statius’ Thebaid’, Classical Quarterly 64: 778–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, R. (ed.) 2015. ‘Reading Statius through a biographical lens’. In Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E., and Gervais, K. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Statius (Leiden: Brill), 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, A. M. 1957. ‘Landscape in Greek poetry’, Yale Classical Studies 15: 3–29.Google Scholar
Parry, A. M. 1963. ‘The two voices of Virgil’s Aeneid’, Arion 2.4: 66–80.Google Scholar
Parry, H. 1964. ‘Ovid’s Metamorphoses: Violence in a Pastoral Landscape’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 95: 268–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasqualini, A. 2009. ‘Frammenti di vita: le contraddizioni di Domiziano’, in Favero, A. and Marpicati, P. (eds.), Domitianus Dominus et Deus. Storia, Archeologia e Letteratura nell’Età dei Flavi. Atti del Convegno (Roma-Priverno: Artegraf Edizioni), 19–31.Google Scholar
Pasqualini, A. 2019. ‘Domiziano e la cupiditas aedificandi dei Flavi’, in Malavolta, M. and Pasqualini, A. (eds.), Imperatori Romani. Saggi e Conferenze (Rome: Universitalia), 197–219.Google Scholar
Patterson, A. 1987. Pastoral and Ideology: Virgil to Valéry. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavan, A. 2009. La gara delle quadrighe e il gioco della guerra: saggio di commento a P. Papinii Statii Thebaidos liber VI 238–549. Milan: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Pelttari, A. 2014. The Space That Remains: Reading Latin Poetry in Late Antiquity. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Petruccioli, G. 2014. ‘The Cancelleria reliefs, Vespasian the younger, and Domitian’s dynastic program’, Bulletin Antieke Beschaving 89: 109–127.Google Scholar
Pollmann, K. F. L. 2001. ‘Statius’ Thebaid and the legacy of Vergil’s Aeneid’, Mnemosyne 54: 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollmann, K. F. L. (ed.) 2004. Statius, Thebaid 12: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Studien zur Geschichte und Kultur des Altertums. Paderborn: Schoeningh.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1970. Virgil’s Pastoral Art: Studies in the Eclogues. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pypłacz, J. 2007. ‘The terrible and the sublime: some notes on Seneca’s poetics’, Classica Cracoviensia 11: 289–301.Google Scholar
Pypłacz, J. 2015. ‘Est locus… the grotteschi of Giovanni Battista Piranesi and the ancient topos of locus horridus’, Biuletyn Biblioteki Jagiellońskiej 65: 181–197.Google Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quint, D. 2004. ‘Fear of falling: Icarus, Phaethon, and Lucretius in Paradise Lost’, Renaissance Quarterly 57: 847–881.Google Scholar
Rajewsky, I. O. 2005. ‘Intermediality, intertextuality, and remediation: a literary perspective on intermediality’, Intermédialités 6: 43–64.Google Scholar
Rajewsky, I. O. 2010. ‘Border talks: the problematic status of media borders in the current debate about intermediality’, in Elleström, L. (ed.), Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramage, E. S. 1989. ‘Juvenal and the establishment: denigration of predecessor in the Satires’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.33: 640–707.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. 2004. The Flesh of Words: The Politics of Writing. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rebeggiani, S. 2013. ‘The chariot race and the destiny of the empire in Statius’ Thebaid’, Illinois Classical Studies 38: 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebeggiani, S. 2018. The Fragility of Power: Statius, Domitian and the Politics of the Thebaid. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, J. D. 2011. ‘The Bellum Civile as a Roman epic’. In Asso, P. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Lucan, 21–31. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. 1983. Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. 1997. ‘The other reader’s response: on multiple, divided, and oppositional audiences’, Criticism 39: 31–53.Google Scholar
Richardson, Jr. L. 1992. A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffaterre, M. 1979. La production du texte. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Riffaterre, M. 1981. ‘Interpretation and undecidability’, New Literary History 12: 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimell, V. E. 2006. Ovid’s Lovers: Desire, Difference and the Poetic Imagination. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimell, V. E. 2008. Martial’s Rome: Empire and the Ideology of Epigram. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. E. 2015. The Closure of Space in Roman Poetics: Empire’s Inward Turn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripoll, F. 1998. La morale héroïque dans les épopées latines d’époque flavienne: tradition et innovation. Paris and Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Ripoll, F. 2015. ‘Statius and Silius Italicus’, in Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E., and Gervais, K. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Statius (Leiden: Brill), 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, P. (ed.) 2009. Lucan’s De Bello Civili Book One. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roche, P. (ed.) 2011. Pliny’s Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, P. (ed.) 2015. ‘Lucan’s De Bello Civili in the Thebaid’, in Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E., and Gervais, K. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Statius (Leiden: Brill), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, M. 2009. ‘The exemplary past in Roman historiography and culture’, in Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians (Cambridge University Press), 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roman, L. 2010. ‘Martial and the city of Rome’, The Journal of Roman Studies 100: 88–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, S. 2009. El Tópico Grecolatino del Concilio de los Dioses. Zurich and New York: Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Rosati, G., 2001. ‘Narrative techniques and narrative structures in the Metamorphoses’, in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ovid (Leiden: Brill), 271–304.Google Scholar
Rosati, G., 2008. ‘Statius, Domitian and acknowledging paternity: rituals of succession in the Thebaid’. In Nauta, R. R., Van Dam, H. J., and Smolenaars, J. J. L. (eds.), The Poetry of Statius (Leiden: Brill), 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosati, G., 2014. ‘Ovid in Flavian occasional poetry (Martial and Statius)’. In Miller, J. F. and Newlands, C. (eds.), A Handbook to the Reception of Ovid (Chichester/Malden: John Wiley & Sons), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosso, E. 2009. ‘Le thème de la res publica restituta dans le monnayage flavien’, in Hurlet, F. and Mineo, B. (eds.), Le principat d’Auguste. Réalités et représentations du pouvoir : autour de la Res publica restituta (Presses universitaires de Rennes), 209–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowell, H. T. 1941. ‘Vergil and the Forum of Augustus’, The American Journal of Philology 62: 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royo, M. 1999. Domus imperatoriae. Topographie, formation et imaginaire des palais impériaux du Palatin. École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Royo, M. 2001. ‘De la Domus Augusti au Palatium Caesarum: nouvelles approches et bilan des vingt dernières années de recherches sur le Palatin impérial’, Pallas 55: 53–88.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. 1998. ‘Trajan and Tacitus’ audience: reader reception of Annals 1–2’, Ramus 27: 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutledge, S. 2009. ‘Writing imperial politics: the social and political background’, in Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A. (eds.), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome (Leiden: Brill), 23–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. L. 2003. ‘Cognitive maps and the construction of narrative space’, in Salmon, J. and Shipley, G. (eds.), Human Landscapes in Classical Antiquity: Environment and Culture (Oxford: Routledge), 214–230.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. L. 2009. ‘Space’, in Hühn, P., Pier, J., Schmid, W., and Schönert, J. (eds.), Handbook of Narratology (Berlin: De Gruyter), 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacerdoti, A. 2008. ‘Seneca’s Phaedra and the last book of Statius’ Thebaid: properate, verendi Cecropidae’, Phoenix 62: 281–289.Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, A. 2019. ‘Semirutos… de pulvere vultus: Vesuvius, Statius and trauma’, in Augoustakis, A. and Littlewood, R. J. (eds.), Campania in the Flavian Poetic Imagination (Oxford University Press), 168–179.Google Scholar
Salemme, C. 2002. Lucano: La Storia verso la Rovina. Milan: Loffredo Editore.Google Scholar
Salvo, D. 2012. ‘Maiestas’, in Bagnall, R. S., Brodersen, K., Champion, C. B., Erskine, A., and Huebner, S. R. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Ancient History (Malden: Wiley-Blackwell), 4237–4238.Google Scholar
Santini, C. 1999. ‘Lucan 3.399–455: locus horridus e codice etimologico in Lucano’, in Esposito, P., and Nicastri, L. (eds.), Interpretare Lucano (Naples: Arte Tipografica), 207–222.Google Scholar
Santoro-L’Hoir, F. 2006. Tragedy, Rhetoric, and the Historiography of Tacitus’ Annales. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterfield, S. 2012. ‘Livy and the timing of expiation in the Roman year’, Histos 6: 67–90.Google Scholar
Sauter, F. 1934. Der Römische Kaiserkult bei Martial und Statius. Stuttgart–Berlin.Google Scholar
Scaffai, M. 2002. ‘L’Ipsipile di Stazio, ovvero le sventure della virtù’, Prometheus 28: 151–170.Google Scholar
Schetter, W. 1960. Untersuchungen zur Epischen Kunst des Statius. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 1985. ‘Il locus horridus nelle Metamorfosi di Apuleio’, Maia. 37.3: 211–223.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2003. The Passions in Play: Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2014. ‘Materiam superabat opus: Lucretius metamorphosed’, Journal of Roman Studies 104: 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, W. 1984. Jupiter in den Epen der Flavierzeit. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Scott, K. 1936. The Imperial Cult under the Flavians. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Scott, R. 1968. Religion and Philosophy in the Histories of Tacitus. Rome: The American Academy Press.Google Scholar
Secci, D. A. 2013. ‘Hercules, Cacus, and Evander’s myth-making in Aeneid 8’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 107: 195–227.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1969. Landscape in Ovid’s Metamorphoses: A Study in the Transformations of a Literary Symbol. Wiesbaden: Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1983. ‘Boundary violation and the landscape of the self in Senecan tragedy’, Antike und Abendland 29: 172–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. 1984. ‘Senecan baroque: the death of Hippolytus in Seneca, Ovid and Euripides’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 114: 311–325.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 2001. ‘Jupiter in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Arion 9: 78–99.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 2014. Poetry and Myth in Ancient Pastoral: Essays on Theocritus and Virgil. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Settis, S. and Donati, F. 2008. La Villa di Livia: le Pareti Ingannevoli. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
Shannon, K. 2012. ‘Memory, religion and history in Nero’s great fire: Tacitus, Annals 15.41–7’, The Classical Quarterly 62: 749–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skempis, M. and Ziogas, I. (eds.) 2013. Geography, Topography, Landscape: Configurations of Space in Greek and Roman Epic. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. S., 2011. ‘Homer in the late antique commentary on Statius’s Thebaid’, Illinois Classical Studies 35: 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolenaars, J. J. L. (ed.) 1994. Statius Thebaid VII: A Commentary. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolenaars, J. J. L. (ed.) 1996. ‘The literary tradition of the locus horridus in Seneca’s Thyestes’, Classica Cracoviensia 2: 89–108.Google Scholar
Soerink, J. 2015. ‘Statius’ Nemea: paradise lost’, Dictynna 12. https://doi.org/10.4000/dictynna.1125.Google Scholar
Soubiran, J. 1998. Lucain: La guerre civile VI.333 – X.546. Toulouse: Éditions universitaires du Sud.Google Scholar
Soja, E. W. 1996. Thirdspace: Expanding the Geographical Imagination. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Soverini, P. 1989. ‘Impero e imperatori nell’opera di Plinio il Giovane: aspetti e problemi del rapporto con Domiziano e Traiano’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.33.1: 515–554.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2010. Roman Landscape: Culture and Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. 2008. ‘Eluding romanitas: heroes and antiheroes in Silius Italicus’ Roman History’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 7: 133–145.Google Scholar
Spinelli, T. 2019a. ‘The Argos narrative in Statius’ Thebaid: a new Ovidian Perseid?’, The American Journal of Philology 140: 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, T. 2019b. ‘Campania and Flavian literature’, The Classical Review 69.2: 1–3.Google Scholar
Spinelli, T. Gregori, G. L. 2019. ‘(Un)damning sub-plots: re-reading the Principate of Domitian in light of fresh material evidence’, Illinois Classical Studies 44.2: 242–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, T. Gregori, G. L. 2021a. ‘Crudelis vincit pater: Oedipal paternities in Statius’ Thebaid’, The Classical Journal 117: 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, T. Gregori, G. L. 2021b. ‘Creating the first digital handbook of Latin phonetics: between linguistics, digital humanities and language teaching’, Digital Classics Online 7:1–20.Google Scholar
Spinelli, T. Gregori, G. L. 2022a. The Diachronic Frequency of Latin Words: A Computational Dictionary. Vol. 1. Digital Classics Books 6.1. Propylaeum. Heidelberg University Press.Google Scholar
Spinelli, T. Gregori, G. L. 2022b. ‘The Latin Diachronic Database: A New Digital Tool for the Study of Latin’, in Dinu, A., Chitez, M., Dinu, L., and Dobre, M. (eds.), Recent Advances in Digital Humanities: Romance Language Applications (Lausanne: Peter Lang), 49–64.Google Scholar
Steele, R. B. 1931. ‘The date of Manilius’, The American Journal of Philology 52.2: 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinby, E. M. (ed.) 2000. Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. Vol. I-VI. Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. R. 2010. ‘Personifications on the coinage of Vespasian (AD 69–79)’, in Acta Classica 53: 181–205.Google Scholar
Stocks, C. 2016. ‘Daddy’s little girl? The father/daughter bond in Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica and Flavian Rome’, in Manioti, N. (ed.), Family in Flavian Epic (Leiden: Brill), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocks, C. 2018. ‘Band of brothers: Fraternal Instability and Civil Strife in Silius Italicus’ Punica’, in Ginsberg, L. D. and Krasne, D. A. (eds.), After 69 CE – Writing Civil War in Flavian Literature (Trends in Classics Supplementary Volumes 65), 253–270.Google Scholar
Stover, T. 2012. Epic and Empire in Vespasianic Rome: A New Reading of Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stover, T. 2016. ‘Opibusque ultra ne crede paternis: fathers and sons on the wrong side of history in Valerius’ Argonautica’, in Manioti, N. (ed.), Family in Flavian Epic (Leiden: Brill), 14–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strazzulla, M. J. 1990. Il Principato di Apollo: Mito e Propaganda nelle Lastre ‘Campana’ del Tempio di Apollo Palatino (Studia Archaeologica 57). Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Sullivan, F. A. 1959. ‘The spiritual itinerary of Virgil’s Aeneas’, The American Journal of Philology, 80: 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, F. A. 1976. ‘Innuendo and the Weighted Alternative in Tacitus’, The Classical Journal 71: 312–326.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1983. Historia Augusta Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taisne, A. M. 1972. ‘Le rôle du serpent dans la mythologie de Stace’, Caesarodunum 7: 357–380.Google Scholar
Talbert, A. 1984. The Senate of Imperial Rome. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. 1997. ‘Aspects of Virgil’s reception in antiquity’, in Martindale, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil (Cambridge University Press), 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. 2002. ‘Ovid and ancient literary history’, in Hardie, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, (Cambridge University Press), 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. (ed.) 2004. P. Ovidi Nasonis Metamorphoses. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. P. 1994. ‘Valerius’ Flavian Argonautica’, Classical Quarterly 44: 212–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terras, M. 2010. ‘The digital classicist: disciplinary focus and interdisciplinary vision’, in Mahony, S. and Bodard, G. (ed.), Digital Research in the Study of Classical Antiquity (London: Routledge), 171–189.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. 2012. ‘Water and the display of power in Augustan Rome’, Water History 4: 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. (ed.) 1994. L’imaginaire religieux gréco-romain. Perpignan: Presses universitaires de Perpignan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 2001. Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipping, B. 2007. ‘Haec tum Roma fuit: past, present, and closure in Silius Italicus’ Punica’, in Heyworth, J., Fowler, P. G., and Harrison, S. J. (eds.), Classical Constructions (Oxford University Press), 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipping, B. 2010. Exemplary Epic: Silius Italicus’ Punica. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Töchterle, K. 1994. Lucius Annaeus Seneca: Oedipus. Kommentar mit Einleitung, Text und Übersetzung. Verlag: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Tomei, M. A. 1992. ‘Nota sui giardini antichi del Palatino’, Mélanges de L’École française de Rome, 104.2: 917–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomei, M. A. 1999. Scavi Francesi sul Palatino: Le Indagini di Pietro Rosa per Napoleone III (1861–1870). Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. (ed.) 2001. Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Torre, C. 2019. ‘La trottola cosmica (Astronomica 3.356–61) da Manilio a Roger Caillois’, Enthymema 23: 461–482.Google Scholar
Tracy, J. 2014. Lucan’s Egyptian Civil War. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, S. 1975. ‘The Marcellus passage (Aeneid 6.860–886) and Aeneid 9–12’, The Classical Journal 70.4: 37–42.Google Scholar
Traglia, A. and Aricò, G. 1980. Opere di Publio Papinio Stazio. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar
Tuck, S. L. 2005. ‘The origins of Roman imperial hunting imagery: Domitian and the redefinition of virtus under the principate’, Greece & Rome 52: 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, S. L. 2016. ‘Imperial Image‐Making’, in Zissos, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome (Edinburgh: Wiley-Blackwell), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uden, J. 2015. The Invisible Satirist: Juvenal and Second-century Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dommelen, P. A. R. and Benjamin, C. R. (eds.) 2007. Articulating Local Cultures: Power and Identity under the Expanding Roman Republic. Portsmouth: Johnston.Google Scholar
Varner, E. R. 2004. Monumenta Graeca et Romana: Mutilation and Transformation: Damnatio Memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venini, P. 1965. Echi Senecani e Lucanei nella Tebaide: Tiranni e Tirannidi. Milan: Istituto Lombardo.Google Scholar
Venini, P. 1970. P. Papini Stati Thebaidos Liber Undecimus. Milan: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Venini, P. 1971. Studi Staziani. Pavia: Tipografia del Libro.Google Scholar
Ventriglia, U. 1971. La Geologia della Città di Roma. Rome: Amministrazione Provinciale di Roma.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1970. ‘Homer the educator of the Greeks’, Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse 33.5: 207–231.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. and Vidal-Naquet, P. 1981. Tragedy and Myth in Ancient Greece. Hempstead: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. 1994. Saturnus and the Saturnalia. Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion (Volume 2: Transition and Reversal in Myth and Ritual). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vessey, D. 1970. ‘Notes on the Hypsipyle episode in Statius’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 17: 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vessey, D. 1973. Statius and the Thebaid. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vessey, D. 1986. ‘Pierius menti calor incidit: Statius’ epic style’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 32.5: 2965–3019.Google Scholar
Vian, F. 1952. La guerre des Géants: le mythe avant l’époque hellénistique. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Villedieu, F. 2001. Il giardino dei Cesari. Dai Palazzi Antichi alla Vigna Barberini sul Monte Palatino: Scavi dell’École française de Rome 1985–1999. Guida alla Mostra. Museo Nazionale Romano, Terme di Diocleziano. Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar
Vogel-Weidemann, U. 1979. ‘The opposition under the early Caesars: Some remarks on its nature and aims’, Acta Classica 22: 91–107.Google Scholar
Vojvoda, M. 2016. ‘The concept of providentia deorum within the imperial cult and propaganda on Roman imperial coins during the Principate’, Archaeology and Science 11: 53–62.Google Scholar
Volk, K. 2009. Manilius and His Intellectual Background. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1982. ‘The golden age and sin in Augustan ideology’, Past & Present 95: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2017. ‘Ovid and mythological painting in Pompeii’, in Fedeli, P. and Rosati, G. (eds.), Ovidio 2017: Prospettive per il Terzo Millennio: Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Teramo: Ricerche & Redazioni), 299–312.Google Scholar
Watson, T. 2015. ‘Fate, the hero and empire: anger in Virgil’s Aeneid and Lucan’s Civil War’, Pseudo-Dionysius 17, 115–130.Google Scholar
Weeda, L. 2015. Vergil’s Political Commentary in the Eclogues, Georgics and Aeneid. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, K. E. 2007. The Roman Amphitheatre: From its Origins to the Colosseum. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
West, D. 2002. Horace Odes III: dulce periculum. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. 1995. ‘Imago mundi: another view of the creation in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, American Journal of Philology 116: 95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, S. 1999. A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. 2000. Narrative Dynamics in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Tübingen: Classica Monacensia.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. 2002. ‘Introduction: toward a literary history of Ovid’s reception in antiquity’, Arethusa 35: 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, R. 2005. ‘Art and ideology: the case of the Pergamon gigantomachy’, Acta Classica 48: 163–174.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. 2019. The Arts of Imitation in Latin Prose: Pliny’s Epistles/Quintilian in Brief. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (ed.) 1972. P. Papini Stati Thebaidos liber X. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. 1978. Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. 1983. Technique and Ideas in the Aeneid. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1986. ‘Statius and Vergil: defensive imitation’, in Bernard, J. D. (ed.), Vergil at 2000 (New York: Brill), 207–224.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 2009. ‘The Metamorphoses: politics and narrative’, in Knox, P. E. and Wiley, J. A. (eds.), A Companion to Ovid (Malden: Wiley-Blackwell), 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, F. H. 1935. ‘Studies in the social and economic history of Ostia: part one’, Papers of the British School at Rome 13: 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, M. M. 2009. ‘Juvenal: zealous vindicator of Roman liberty’, in Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. (eds.), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome (Leiden: Brill), 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1995. Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2015. The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. 2016. ‘Public images of the Flavian dynasty: sculpture and coinage’. In Zissos, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome (London: John Wiley & Sons), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, G. 2003. ‘The city of letters’, in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis (Cambridge University Press), 202–223.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Detroit: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanker, P. 2002. ‘Domitian’s palace on the Palatine and the imperial image’, in Millar, F. (ed.), Representations of Empire: Rome and the Mediterranean World (Oxford University Press), 105–130.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1990. ‘Thebes: theater of self and society in Athenian drama’, in Winkler, J. and Zeitlin, F. (eds.), Nothing to Do with Dionysos (Princeton University Press), 130–67.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 2001. ‘Visions and revisions of Homer’. In Goldhill, S. (ed.), Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire (Cambridge University Press), 195–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziogas, I. 2013. ‘The topography of epic narrative in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’. In Skempis, M. and Ziogas, I. (eds.), Geography, Topography, Landscape: Configurations of Space in Greek and Roman Epic (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zissos, A. (ed.) 2008. Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica, Book 1: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zissos, A. (ed.) 2009. ‘Navigating politics: the Argonautica of Valerius Flaccus’. In Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. (eds.), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome (Leiden: Brill), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zissos, A. (ed.) 2016. A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome. London: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×