Book contents
- State-Sponsored Activism
- State-Sponsored Activism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 A New Approach to Studying Civil Society
- 3 Grievances, Resources, and Opportunities: The Initial Success of Brazil's AIDS Movement
- 4 Transformations in the State
- 5 Expanding the Movement from Above
- 6 Expanding the Movement from Below
- 7 The Rise of Hybrid Social Movements
- 8 Re-examining State–Society Relations in the Twenty-First Century
- Appendix Survey and Catalog of Associations
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2019
Book contents
- State-Sponsored Activism
- State-Sponsored Activism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 A New Approach to Studying Civil Society
- 3 Grievances, Resources, and Opportunities: The Initial Success of Brazil's AIDS Movement
- 4 Transformations in the State
- 5 Expanding the Movement from Above
- 6 Expanding the Movement from Below
- 7 The Rise of Hybrid Social Movements
- 8 Re-examining State–Society Relations in the Twenty-First Century
- Appendix Survey and Catalog of Associations
- References
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- State-Sponsored ActivismBureaucrats and Social Movements in Democratic Brazil, pp. 218 - 231Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abers, Rebecca. 2003, Jun 10. “Brazil Becomes Developing World Model for HIV/AIDS Treatment, Prevention Strategy.” Kaiser Health News Network.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2005, Jul 28. “Science and Technology: Roll Out, Roll Out; AIDS in Brazil.” The Economist.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2006. “Descentralização dá mais eficiência ao sistema, mas ainda causa problemas.” Valor Econômico, April 12.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2008. “Ex-secretário de Saúde e mais nove são presos em operação.” O Globo, July 15.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2009a. Fortalecimento do Associativismo e do Cooperativismo dos Catadores de Materiais Recicláveis: Formação para a Autogestão, Assistência Técnica e Mobilização. edited by Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2010a. “Falta de remédio para HIV causa protestos.” Gazeta do Povo, April 29.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2010b. “Falta de remédios contra aids causa protestos.” O Estado de São Paulo, April 28.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2012a. “ONGs acusam governo de discriminar gays.” Agência Estado, February 11.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2012b. “ONGs/Aids divulgam protesto contra desmantelamento do controle social no Governo Dilma.” Agência AIDS, March 22.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2019. “Bureaucratic Activism: Pursuing Environmentalism Inside the Brazilian State.” Latin American Politics and Society 61 (1).Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca and Tatagiba, Luciana. 2015. “Institutional Activism: Mobilizing for Women's Health from Inside the Brazilian Bureaucracy.” In Social Movement Dynamics: New Perspectives on Theory and Research from Latin America, edited by Rossi, Federico and von Bülow, Marisa. Surrey, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca and Keck, Margaret. 2013. Practical Authority: Agency and Institutional Change in Brazilian Water Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca and von Bülow, Marisa. 2011. “Movimentos sociais na teoria e na prática: Como Estudar o Ativismo Através da Fronteira entre Estado e Sociedade?” Sociologias 13 (28): 52–84.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca, Serafim, Lizandra, and Tatagiba, Luciana. 2014. “Changing Repertoires of State–Society Interaction under Lula.” In Brazil under the Workers’ Party: Continuity and Change from Lula to Dilma. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca Neara. 2000. Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
ABIA. 1989. “Entrevista com o dr. Álvaro Matida e a Doutora Regina Guedes, do Departamento de Vigilância Epidemiológica da Secretaria Estadual de Saúde/RJ.” Boletím ABIA.Google Scholar
Abrucio, Fernando Luiz. 1998. Os Barões da Federação: Os Governadores e a Redemocratização Brasileira. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.Google Scholar
Abrucio, Fernando, Loureiro, Maria Rita, and Pacheco, Silvia, eds. 2010. Burocracia e Política no Brasil: Desafio para o Estado Democrático no Século XXI. Rio de Janeiro: Editora de Fundação Getulio Vargas.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia. 1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women's Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E. 1999. “Advocating Feminism: The Latin American Feminist NGO ‘Boom’.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 1 (2):181–209. doi: 10.1080/146167499359880.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E., Dagnino, Evelina, and Escobar, Arturo. 1998. Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultures: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Amengual, Matthew. 2016. Politicized Enforcement in Argentina: Labor and Environmental Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin. 2008. When Movements Matter: The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arce, Moises. 2008. “The Repoliticization of Collective Action after Neoliberalism in Peru.” Latin American Politics and Society 50 (3):37–62.Google Scholar
Arce, Moises, and Bellinger, Paul T. Jr. 2007. “Low-Intensity Democracy Revisited: The Effects of Economic Liberalization on Political Activity in Latin America.” World Politics 60:97–121.Google Scholar
Arnquist, Sarah, Ellner, Andrew, and Weintraub, Rebecca. 2011. “Title.” Questões relativas à Provisão Universal de Saúde.Google Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2002. “Federalismo e Relações Intergovernamentais no Brasil: A Reforma de Programas Sociais.” Dados: Revista de Ciências Sociais 45 (3):431–458.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2009. Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Baldioti, Fernanda. 2010. “Pacientes com HIV enfrentam falta de remédios e médicos em postos do Rio, além da demora para realização de exames.” O Globo, January 27, 2010.Google Scholar
Bano, Masooda. 2008. “Dangerous Correlations: Aid's Impact on NGOs’ Performance and Ability to Mobilize Members in Pakistan.” World Development 36 (11):2109–2562.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Cristiane. 2008. “No Brasil, acesso ao tratamento é tardio para mais de 40% dos pacientes.” Cadernos PELAVIDDA: Aids, tratamento e ativismo XVII (46):18–19.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Cristiane and Ferrari, Raphael. 2007. “Pesquisa revela a precária realidade dos CTAs em todo o Brasil.” Cadernos PELAVIDDA: Aids, tratamento e ativismo 31:2297–2313.Google Scholar
Barboza, Renato. 2006. “Gestão do Programa Estadual DST/Aids de São Paulo: uma análise do processo de descentralização das ações no período de 1994 a 2003.” Mestrado, Saúde Coletiva, Coordenadoria de Controle de Doenças da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo (SES/CCD/CD-141/06).Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance and Segerberg, Alexandra. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics.Google Scholar
Biancarelli, Aureliano. 2012. 15 anos na promoção de Direitos: Fórum de ONG/Aids do Estado de São Paulo. 1st edn. São Paulo: Editora cuore.Google Scholar
Biehl, Joao. 2007. “Pharmaceuticalization: AIDS Treatment and Global Health Politics.” Anthropological Quarterly 80 (4):1083–1126.Google Scholar
Biehl, João Guilherme and Eskerod, Torben. 2007. Will to Live: AIDS Therapies and the Politics of Survival. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Barbara L. and Garrison, John. 1999. NGO participation in HIV/AIDS Control Project in Brazil achieves results (English). Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development network newsletter. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Brandão, Igor. 2018. “Governar o desperdício: a inclusão de catadores no regime brasileiro de políticas de resíduos.” Instituto de Ciência Política, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Brandão, Igor, and Vilaça, Luiz. n.d. Ativismo burocrático na construção de Belo Monte e na inclusão socioprodutiva de catadores de materiais recicláveis.Google Scholar
Brass, Jennifer N. 2016. Allies or Adversaries: NGOs and the State in Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruera, Hernán F Gómez. 2013. Lula, the Workers’ Party and the Governability Dilemma in Brazil. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brysk, Alison. 2000. “Democratizing Civil Society in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 11 (3):151–165.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell, Hershberg, Eric, and Sharpe, Kenneth. 2012. New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Voice and Consequence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan US.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cartaxo, Mariana G. 2018. “Dez Anos de Política de Aids (2006–2016) Conflictos e Transformações.” Instituto de Ciência Política, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Ana Paula Soares. 2007. “Reforma Urbana no Brasil: a intelligentzia e o Estatuto da Cidade.” XIII Congresso Brasileiro de Sociologia.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society, Information Age. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Castilho, Euclides and Chequer, Pedro. 1997. “Epidemiologia do HIV/AIDS no Brasil.” In Políticas, Instituições e AIDS: Enfrentando a Epidemia no Brasil, edited by Parker, Richard. Rio de Janeiro: ABIA.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Douglas A., Vilas, Carlos M., Hite, Katherine, Martin, Scott B., Piester, Kerianne, and Segarra, Monique, eds. 1997. The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation, 1st edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chartock, Sarah. 2013. “Corporatism With Adjectives? Conceptualizing Civil Society Incorporation and Indigenous Participation in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 55 (2):52–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00193.x.Google Scholar
Cohen, Cathy J. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 1995. “Trajectory of a Concept: ‘Corporatism’ in the Study of Latin American Politics.” In Latin America in Comparative Perspective: New Approaches to Methods and Analysis, edited by Smith, Peter H.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Collier, Ruth Berins. 1977. “Who Does What, to Whom, and How: Toward a Comparative Analysis of Latin American Corporatism.” In Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, edited by Malloy, James M., 489–512. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1979. “Inducements versus Constraints: Disaggregating ‘Corporatism’.” The American Political Science Review 73 (4):967–986.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David 1991. Shaping The Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins and Handlin, Samuel. 2009a. “Logics of Collective Action, State Linkages, and Aggregate Traits: The UP-Hub versus the A-Net.” In Reorganizing Popular Politics: Participation and the New Interest Regime in Latin America, 61–92. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Handlin, Samuel 2009b. Reorganizing Popular Politics: Participation and the New Interest Regime in Latin America. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Maria Lorena. 2010. Politics of Labor Reform in Latin America: Between Flexibility and Rights. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Ron, James. 2002. “The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action.” International Security 27 (1):5–39.Google Scholar
Coslovsky, Salo and Nigam, Amit. 2015. Building Prosecutorial Autonomy from Within: The Transformation of the Ministério Público in Brazil. NYU Wagner Working Paper.Google Scholar
Câmara, Cristina and Lima, Ronaldo. 2000. “Historica das ONGs/AIDS e sua contribuição no campo das lutas sociais.” Cadernos Abong 28:29–74.Google Scholar
D'Argent, Eduardo. 2015. Technocracy and Democracy in Latin America: The Experts Running Government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina, Olivera, Alberto, and Panfichi, Aldo. 2006. A disputa pela construção democrática na América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City, Yale Studies in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daniel, Herbert and Parker, Richard. 1991. “A terceira epidemia: o exercício da solidariedade.” In AIDS: A Terceira Epidemia, edited by Daniel, Herbert and Parker, Richard. São Paulo: Iglu Editora.Google Scholar
Daniel, Herbert, and Parker, Richard G.. 1993. Sexuality, Politics, and AIDS in Brazil: In Another World?, Social Aspects of AIDS. London Washington, DC: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Gordon J. and Hawes, Amanda. 1967. “Toward an Understanding of Decision Making in the Office of Economic Opportunity.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 2:259–297.Google Scholar
De la Dehesa, Rafael. 2010. Queering the Public Sphere in Mexico and Brazil: Sexual Rights Movements in Emerging Democracies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, Andretta, Massimillano, Mosca, Lorenzo, and Reiter, Herbert. 2006. Globalization from Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, and Diani, Mario. 2006. Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Diani, Mario. 2003. “Networks and Social Movements: A Research Programme.” In Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, xix, 348 p. ill., map 24 cm, edited by Diani, M. and McAdam, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2):147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2006. “Decentralization's Nondemocratic Roots: Authoritarianism and Subnational Reform in Latin America.” Latin American Politics & Society 48 (1):1–26.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent and Tyler, Dickovick. 2004. “The Politics of Re-centralization in Argentina and Brazil.” Latin American Research Review 39 (1):90–122.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Susan. 2001. Power and Popular Protest: Latin American Social Movements. 2nd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Simmons, Beth. 2013. “Getting to Rights: Treaty Ratification, Constitutional Convergence, and Human Rights Practice.” Harvard International Law Journal 54 (1):61–94.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo and Alvarez, Sonia, eds. 1992. The Making Of Social Movements In Latin America: Identity, Strategy, And Democracy Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1996. “Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Creating Synergy across the Public-Private Divide.” World Development 24 (6):1119–1132.Google Scholar
Ewig, Christina. 1999. “The Strengths and Limits of the NGO Women's Movement Model: Shaping Nicaragua's Democratic Institutions.” Latin American Research Review 34 (3):75–102.Google Scholar
Facchini, Regina. 2005. Sopa de letrinhas?: Movimento homossexual e produção de identidades coletivas nos anos 90. Editora Garamond.Google Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2015. Private Wealth and Public Revenue in Latin America: Business Power and Tax Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Faleiros, Vicente de Paula, da Silva, Jacinta de Fátima Senna, de Vasconcellos, Luis Carlos Fadel, and Silveira, Rosa Maria Godoy. 2006. A Construção do SUS: Histórias da Reforma Sanitária e o Processo Participativo. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia. 2010. Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Tracy Beck. 2009. “Avoiding Governors: The Success of Bolsa Família.” Latin American Research Review 44 (1):102–131.Google Scholar
Flynn, Matthew. 2008. “Public Production of Anti-Retroviral Medicines in Brazil, 1990–2007.” Development and Change 39 (4):513–536.Google Scholar
Flynn, Matthew. 2015. Pharmaceutical Autonomy and Public Health in Latin America: State, Society, and Industry in Brazil's AIDS Program, Routledge Studies in Latin American Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fox, J. 1994. “The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico.” World Politics 46 (2):151–184.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 1993. The Politics of Food in Mexico: State Power and Social Mobilization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth Jay and Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2002. “Assessing the Third Transition in Latin American Democratization: Representational Regimes and Civil society in Argentina and Brazil.” Comparative Politics, 35(1):21–42.Google Scholar
Galvão, Jane. 2000. AIDS no Brasil: a agenda de construção de uma epidemia. 1st edn. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil São Paulo, SP, Brasil: Associação Brasileira Interdisciplinar de AIDS; Editora 34.Google Scholar
Galvão, Jane. 2008. “Betinho: A Celebration of Life.” Chapter 12 in The Practice of International Health: a Case-Based Approach, edited by Perlman, Daniel and Roy, Ananya. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2007. “Social Policy and Collective Action: Unemployed Workers, Community Associations, and Protest in Argentina.” Politics & Society 35 (2):301–328. doi: 10.1177/0032329207300392.Google Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gauri, Varun and Lieberman, Evan. 2006. “Boundary Institutions and HIV/AIDS Policy in Brazil and South Africa.” Studies in Comparative International Development 41 (3):47–73.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “Building ‘State’ Autonomy in Brazil: 1930–1964.” Comparative Politics 22 (2):217–235.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2011. Deepening Local Democracy in Latin America: Participation, Decentralization, and the Left. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Green, James. 1999. Beyond Carnaval: Male Homosexuality in Twentieth-Century Brazil. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Greenstone, J. David and Peterson, Paul E.. 1973. Race and Authority in Urban Politics: Community Participation and the War on Poverty. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee S. 1980. Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee S. 2004. “Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries.” Governance 17 (4):525–548. doi: 10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee Serrill. 2007. Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization, and the Promise of Good Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, Akhil. 2012. Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert, and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. Center of International Studies. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Published for the Center of International Studies, Princeton University by Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gurza Lavalle, Adrian, Acharya, Arnab, and Houtzager, Peter. 2005. “Beyond Comparative Anecdotalism: How Civil and Political Organizations Shape Participation in São Paulo, Brazil.” World Development 33 (6):951–964.Google Scholar
Gurza Lavalle, Adrian, Houtzager, Peter, and Castello, Graziela. 2006. “Representação política e organizações civis: Novas instâncias de mediação e os desafios da legitimidade.” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 21 (60):43–66.Google Scholar
Gurza Lavalle, Adrian, Voigt, Jessica, and Serafim, Lizandra. 2016. “O que fazem os conselhos e quando o fazem? Padrões decisórios e o debate dos efeitos das instituições participativas.” Dados – Revista de Ciências Sociais 59 (3):609–650.Google Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2000. “Democratizing Pressures from Below? Social Movements in the New Brazilian Democracy.” Democratic Brazil: actors, institutions, and processes, chapter 8, edited by Kingstone, Peter R. and Power, Timothy J., 167–184. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn and Keck, Margaret E.. 2007. Greening Brazil: Environmental Activism in State and Society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathy. 2008. “Organized Civil Society in Lula's Brazil.” In Democratic Brazil Revisited, edited by Peter, Kingston and Power, Timothy J., 33–56. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Florian and Bentes, Fernando. 2008. “Accountability for Social and Economic Rights in Brazil.” In Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World, edited by Gauri, Varun and Brinks, Daniel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Philip N. and Hussain, Muzammil M.. 2013. Democracy's Fourth Wave?: Digital Media and the Arab Spring, Oxford Studies in Digital Politics. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala and Weldon, Laurel. 2018. The Logics of Gender Justice: State Action and Women's Rights Around the World, Cambridge Studies in Gender and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 2010. The Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil, 1989–2009. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jalali, Rita. 2013. “Financing Empowerment? How Foreign Aid to Southern Ngos and Social Movements Undermines Grass-Roots Mobilization.” Sociology Compass 7 (1):55–73. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12007.Google Scholar
Jelin, Elizabeth. 1997. “Emergent Citizenship or Exclusion? Social Movements and Non-Governmental Organizations in the 1990s.” In Politics, Social Change, and Economic Restructuring in Latin America, edited by Smith, William C. and Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Jones, Patrice M. 2003, Jun 08. “Brazil AIDS Program Touted as Model for World.” Chicago Tribune.Google Scholar
Juris, Jeffrey S. 2008. Networking Futures: The Movements against Corporate Globalization, Experimental Futures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Juris, Jeffrey S., and Khasnabish, Alex. 2013. Insurgent Encounters: Transnational Activism, Ethnography, and the Political. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 2009. Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance, Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert and Nelson, Joan, eds. 2004. Crucial Needs, Weak Incentives: Social Sector Reform, Democratization, and Globalization in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, M. E., and Sikkink, K.. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kingstone, Peter R. 1999. Crafting Coalitions for Reform: Business Preferences, Political Institutions, and Neoliberal Reform in Brazil. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Kingstone, Peter, Young, Joseph K., and Aubrey, Rebecca. 2013. “Resistance to Privatization: Why Protest Movements Succeed and Fail in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 55 (3):93–116.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1996. “The Organizational Structure of New Social Movements in a Political Context.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 152–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2004. “Dilemmas of Democracy in the Open Economy Lessons From Latin America.” World Politics 56:262–302.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steve. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Roberts, Kenneth, eds. 2011. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2009. Boundaries of Contagion: How Ethnic Politics Have Shaped Government Responses to AIDS. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Loureiro, Maria Rita, Macário, Vinicius, and Guerra, Pedro. 2013. Democracia, arenas decisórias e políticas públicas: o Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida. Texto para Discussão, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA).Google Scholar
Lucero, Jose Antonio. 2008. Struggles of Voice: The Politics of Indigenous Representation in the Andes. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Lusa, Agência. 2010. “Brasil: Falta de antirretrovirais gera protestos em sete estados brasileiros.” Agência Lusa, April 28.Google Scholar
Macrae, Edward. 1997. “Movimentos Sociais e os Direitos de Cidadania dos Homossexuais.” In Trabalho, cultura e cidadania – um balanço da história social brasileira, edited by Araújo, A.. São Paulo: Editora Scritta.Google Scholar
Malloy, James M. 1977. Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Manuela, Massé. 2009. “From Cycles of Protest to Equilibrium: Explaining the Evolution of AIDS-related Non-governmental Organisations in Brazil.” Masters in Philosophy, Latin American Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maricato, Ermínia. 2000. “As idéias fora do lugar e o lugar fora das idéias.” A cidade do pensamento único: desmanchando consensos. Petrópolis: Vozes:165.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2019a. Building Participatory Institutions in Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2019b. “The Origins of Strong Institutional Design: Policy Reform and Participatory Institutions in Brazil's Health Sector.” Comparative Politics.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay and Rich, Jessica. n.d. “Brazil's Participatory Infrastructure: Opportunities and Limitations for Inclusion.” In The New Inclusion in Latin America, edited by Kapiszewski, Diana, Levitsky, Steve, and Yashar, Deborah.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Richard Scott, W.. 2005. “Organizations and Movements.” In Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by Davis, Gerald F., Doug McAdam, W. Richard Scott and Zald, Mayer N., 4–40. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAllister, Lesley K. 2008. Making Law Matter: Environmental Protection and Legal Institutions in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books. Book.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D. and Zald, Mayer N.. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” The American Journal of Sociology 82 (6):1212–1241.Google Scholar
McGann, James and Johnstone, Mary. 2006. “The Power Shift and the NGO Credibility Crisis.” The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law 8 (2):65–77.Google Scholar
McGuire, James W. 1997. Peronism without Peron: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McNulty, Stephanie L. 2011. Voice and Vote: Decentralization and Participation in Post-Fujimori Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Melo, Daniela Tranches de. 2015. Movimentos Sociais e Institucionalizacao de Politicas Publicas de Saude no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: MAUAD.Google Scholar
Mericle, Kenneth S. 1977. “Corporatist Control of the Working Class: Authoritarian Brazil Since 1964.” In Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, edited by Malloy, James M.. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S. 2004. “Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology, 30:125–145.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1949. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Illinois, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred and Samuels, David. 2004. Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 1998. “State Interests and the New Industrial Policy in Brazil: The Privatization of Steel, 1990–1994.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 40 (3):27–62.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 2001. “Decentralizing Democracy: Spain and Brazil in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics 33 (2):149–169.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 2002. Shifting States in Global Markets: Subnational Industrial Policy in Contemporary Brazil and Spain. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2001. Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Laura R. 2015. “Not Fooling Around: The Politics of Sex Worker Activism in Brazil.” Doctorate of Philosophy, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Needleman, Martin L. and Needleman, Carolyn Emerson. 1974. Guerrillas in the Bureaucracy: The Community Planning Experiment in the United States. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nunes, Edson de Oliveira. 1997. A gramática política do Brasil: Clientelismo e insulamento burocrático. Brasília: Escola Nacional de Administração Pública.Google Scholar
Nunn, Amy. 2009. The Politics and History of AIDS Treatment in Brazil. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Claudio. 2006. “Religiões e AIDS: Uma agenda de desafios.” Boletim ABIA 54:6–7.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, P. 2006. “Conceptualizing Civil Society from the Bottom Up: A Political Economy Perspective.” In Civil Society and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Feinberg, R., Waisman, C. H. and Zamosc, L., 59–84. York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, Philip and Ducatenzeiler, Graciela. 1998. What Kind of Democracy? What Kind of Market?: Latin America in the Age of Neoliberalism. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Joshua. 2011. The Toughest Beat: Politics, Punishment, and the Prison Officers’ Union in California. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Richard. 1997. Políticas, Instituições e AIDS: Enfrentando a Epidemia no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: ABIA.Google Scholar
Parker, Richard. 1999. Beneath the Equator: Cultures of Desire, Male Homosexuality, and Emerging Gay Communities in Brazil. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parker, Richard. 2003. “Building the Foundations for the Response to HIV/AIDS in Brazil: The Development of HIV/AIDS Policy, 1982 – 1996.” Divulgação em Saúde para Debate 27:143–183.Google Scholar
Parker, Richard. 2009. “Civil Society, Political Mobilization, and the Impact of HIV Scale-Up on Health Systems in Brazil.” JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome 52 (1):49–51.Google Scholar
Parker, Richard and Terto, Veriano. 2001. Solidariedade: A ABIA, Na virada do milenio. Rio de Janeiro: ABIA.Google Scholar
Paschel, Tianna. 2016. Becoming Black Political Subjects: Movements and Ethno-Racial Rights in Colombia and Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, Maria Cecília Gomes and Teixeira, Marco Antonio Carvalho. 2011. “A inclusão de catadores em programas de coleta seletiva: da agenda local à nacional.” Cadernos EBAPE.br 9 (3):895–913.Google Scholar
Phillips, Susan. 1991. “Meaning and Structure in Social Movements: Mapping the Network of National Canadian Women's Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 24 (4):755–782.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1979. Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy and Samuels, David. 2014. “The Impact of Participatory Democracy: Evidence from Brazil's National Public Policy Conferences.” Comparative Politics 46 (3):313–332.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert, and Nanetti, Raffaella. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raizer, Elisabeth. 1997. “O estatal, o público e o privado e suas expressões na epidemia de Aids.” Ph.D. Doctoral Dissertation, Pontífica Universidade.Google Scholar
Raxach, Juan Carlos. 2005. “As deficiências do atendimentos aos portadores de HIV/AIDS.” Boletim ABIA (53):4–5.Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica. 2019. “Making National Participatory Institutions Work: Bureaucrats, Activists, and AIDS Policy in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society 61 (1).Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica A. J. 2013. “Grassroots Bureaucracy: Intergovernmental Relations and Popular Mobilization in Brazil's AIDS Policy Sector.” Latin American Politics and Society 55 (2):1–25.Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica A. J. and Eduardo, J. Gómez. 2012. “Centralizing Decentralized Governance in Brazil.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 2012. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjs002.Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica A. J., Mayka, Lindsay, and Montero, Alfred. 2019. “The Politics of Participation in Latin America: New Actors and Institutions. Latin American Politics and Society 61 (1).Google Scholar
Rios, Roger Rapp. 2003. “Legal responses to the AIDS epidemic in Brazil.” Divulgação Em Saúde Para Debate 27:228–238.Google Scholar
Roberts, Andrew. 2005. “The Quality of Democracy.” Comparative Politics, 37 (3):357–376.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2008. “The Mobilization of Opposition to Economic Liberalization.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1):327–349.Google Scholar
Rolnik, Raquel. 2011. “Desafios para a implementação do direito à moradia no Brasil.” In Quintas urbanas: Cidades e possibilidades, edited by Martins, César Augusto Ávila, da Silva, Susana Maria Veleda, and Martins, Solismar Fraga. Rio Grande: Editora e Gráfica da FURG: 13–23.Google Scholar
Rossi, Federico M. 2015. “The Second Wave of Incorporation in Latin America: A Conceptualization of the Quest for Inclusion Applied to Argentina.” Latin American Politics and Society 57 (1):1–28.Google Scholar
Rossi, Federico M. 2017. The Poor's Struggle for Political Incorporation: The Piquetero Movement in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Federico M. and Silva, Eduardo. 2018. “Reshaping the Political Arena in Latin America: From Resisting Neoliberalism to the Second Incorporation.” In Pitt Latin American series. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/59058/.Google Scholar
Rossi, Federico M., and Von Bülow, Marisa. 2016. Social Movement Dynamics: New Perspectives on Theory and Research from Latin America. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Rossi, Federico and Von Bülow, Marisa. 2015. “Introduction: Theory-Building Beyond Borders.” In Social Movement Dynamics: New Perspectives on Theory and Research from Latin America, edited by Rossi, Federico and Bülow, Marisa Von. Surrey: United Kingdom: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Samuels, David J. and Abrucio, Fernando Luiz. 2000. “Federalism and Democratic Transitions: The ‘New’ Politics of the Governors in Brazil.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 30 (2):43–61.Google Scholar
Samuels, David J. and Zucco, Cesar. 2018. Partisans, Antipartisans, and Nonpartisans: Voting Behavior in Brazil. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saúde, Ministério da. 2003. Catálogo de organizações da sociedade civil HIV/AIDS 2001/2002. edited by Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 2015. “Will The Present Crisis Revive the Neo-Corporatist Sisyphus?” In Complex Democracy: Varieties, Crises, and Transformations. Edited by Schneider, Volker and Eberlein, Burkard. 155–163. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” The Review of Politics 36 (1):85–131.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1971. Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 1991. Politics within the State: Elite Bureaucrats and Industrial Policy in Authoritarian Brazil. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2004. Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sekles, Flavia. 2001. “Brazil's Needle-Exchange Programs Reduced HIV Risks for Drug Users,” Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Selee, Andrew D. and Peruzzotti, Enrique. 2009. Participatory Innovation and Representative Democracy in Latin America. Washington, DC; Baltimore, MD: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Serafim, Lizandra. 2013. “Participação no governo Lula: as pautas da reforma urbana no Ministério das Cidades (2003–2010).”Google Scholar
Shadlen, Kenneth C. 2002. “Orphaned by Democracy: Small Industry in Contemporary Mexico.” Comparative Politics 35 (1):43–62.Google Scholar
Shadlen, Kenneth C. 2017. Coalitions and Compliance: The Political Economy of Pharmaceutical Patents in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. 2009. Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. 2013. “Transnational Activism and National Movements in Latin America: Concepts, Theories, and Expectations.” In Transnational Activism and National Movements in Latin America: Bridging the Divide, edited by Silva, Eduardo, 232. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo and Rossi, Federico M.. 2018. Reshaping the Political Arena in Latin America: From Resisting Neoliberalism to the Second Incorporation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. 1962. Theory of Collective Behavior, International Library of Sociology and Social Reconstruction. London: Routledge & Paul.Google Scholar
Smith, Jackie. 2008. Social Movements for Global Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Solano, Nelson. 2000. “As organizações não-governamentais e a coordenação nacional de DST/AIDS.” Cadernos ABONG 28:75–130.Google Scholar
Souza, Celina. 1997. Constitutional Engineering in Brazil: The Politics of Federalism and Decentralization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Souza, Celina. 1998. “Intermediação de Interesses Regionais no Brasil: O Impacto do Federalismo e da Descentralização.” Dados 41 (3).Google Scholar
Souza, Celina. 2008a. “Regras e contexto: as reformas da Constituição de 1988.” Dados 51 (4).Google Scholar
Souza, Paula de Oliveira e. 2008b. “AIDS, Religiões, e Políticas Públicas.” Boletim ABIA (56): 8–9.Google Scholar
Spink, Mary Jane Paris. 2003. A Comissão Nacional de Aids: a presença do passado na construção do futuro. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Spires, Anthony J. 2011. “Contingent Symbiosis and Civil Society in an Authoritarian State: Understanding the Survival of China's Grassroots NGOs.” American Journal of Sociology 117 (1):1–45.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Paul F. 2001. Environmental Leadership in Developing Countries: Transnational Relations and Biodiversity Policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1978. The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Elliot. 2005. Evaluation of UNESCO Brazil's Contribution to AIDS II. edited by Unesco.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann, and Watkins, Susan Cotts. 2017. A Fraught Embrace: The Romance and Reality of AIDS Altruism in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tarlau, Rebecca. 2013. “Coproducing Rural Public Schools in Brazil Contestation, Clientelism, and the Landless Workers‚ Äô Movement.” Politics & Society 41 (3): 395–424. doi: 10.1177/0032329213493753.Google Scholar
Tarlau, Rebecca. 2019. Occupying Schools, Occupying Land: How the Landless Workers Movement Transformed Brazilian Education, Global and Comparative Ethnography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 2nd edn, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge England; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 2005. The New Transnational Activism, Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Paulo. 1997. “Políticas públicas em Aids.” In Políticas, instituicões e Aids: enfrentando a epidemia no Brasil, chapter 5, edited by Parker, Richard. Rio de Janiero: ABIA.Google Scholar
Tendler, Judith. 1997. Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Terto, Veriano Jr.. 1997. “A AIDS e o local de trabalho no Brasil.” In Políticas, Instituições e AIDS: Enfrentando a Epidemia no Brasil, chapter 5, edited by Parker, Richard. Rio de Janeiro: ABIA.Google Scholar
Thayer, Millie. 2010. Making Transnational Feminism: Rural Women, NGO Activists, and Northern Donors in Brazil. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Tulchin, Joseph S., and Selee, Andrew, eds. 2004. Decentralization and Democratic Governance in Latin America. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.Google Scholar
Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2005. From Movements to Parties in Latin America. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ventura, Miriam. 2003. “Strategies to promote and guarantee the rights of people living with HIV/AIDS.” Divulgação Em Saúde Para Debate 27:239–246.Google Scholar
Viana, Rafael R. 2017. “Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida-Entidades: Um Olhar Para A Ação Dos Atores Em Torno Das Controvérsias.” Instituto de Ciência Política, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Vilaça, Luiz. 2017. “Costuras, deslocamentos e bricolagens: a atuação de procuradores no Ministério Público Federal no caso de Belo Monte.” Masters, Ciência Política, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Von Bülow, Marisa. 2010. Building Transnational Networks: Civil Society and the Politics of Trade in the Americas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2007. Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian, and Avritzer, Leonardo. 2004. “Participatory Publics: Civil Society and New Institutions in Democratic Brazil.” Comparative Politics 36 (3):297–312.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian, and McNulty., Stephanie L. 2011. Does Participatory Governance Matter?: Exploring the Nature and Impact of Participatory Reforms. The Woodrow Wilson Center.Google Scholar
Watkins, Susan Cotts, Swidler, Ann, and Hannan, Thomas. 2012. “Outsourcing Social Transformation: Development NGOs as Organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology 38 (1):285–315. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145516.Google Scholar
Weir, Margaret. 1999. “Power, Money, and Politics in Community Development.” In Urban Problems and Community Development, edited by Ferguson, Ronald F. and Dickens, William T.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. 1995. “Social Movements and the State: The Politics of Health Reform in Brazil.” World Development 23 (10):1699–1712.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard J. 1973. “Toward a Framework for the Study of Political Change in the Iberic-Latin Tradition: The Corporative Model.” World Politics 25 (02):206–235. doi: 10.2307/2010494.Google Scholar
Wolford, Wendy. 2010. This Land Is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1998. Implementation Completion Report: AIDS and STD Control Project (Loan 3659-BR). The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2004. Brazil First and Second AIDS and STD Control Projects: Project Performance Assessment Report. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2005a. Evaluation of the World Bank's Assistance in Responding to the AIDS Epidemic: Brazil Case Study. Washington, DC: Operations Evaluation Department.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2005b. Improving healthcare and quality of life for people living with HIV and AIDS in Brazil.” Document brief.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2007. Governance in Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS): Raising the Quality of Public Spending and Resource Management. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2010. Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Loan in the Amount of US$67 Million to the Federative Republic of Brazil for the AIDS-SUS Project (National AIDS Program – National Health Service). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah J. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zayani, Mohamed. 2015. Networked Publics and Digital Contention: The Politics of Everyday Life in Tunisia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar