Book contents
- Stanley Cavell’s Democratic Perfectionism
- Stanley Cavell’s Democratic Perfectionism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Claiming of Community
- 2 Stanley Cavell as Methodologist
- 3 Two Kinds of Agreement in Democratic Theory
- 4 The Politics of Tragedy, Recognition, and Acknowledgment
- 5 Film, Gender, Gaslighting
- 6 The Limits of Democratic Perfectionism
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 August 2023
Book contents
- Stanley Cavell’s Democratic Perfectionism
- Stanley Cavell’s Democratic Perfectionism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Claiming of Community
- 2 Stanley Cavell as Methodologist
- 3 Two Kinds of Agreement in Democratic Theory
- 4 The Politics of Tragedy, Recognition, and Acknowledgment
- 5 Film, Gender, Gaslighting
- 6 The Limits of Democratic Perfectionism
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Stanley Cavell's Democratic PerfectionismCommunity, Individuality, and Post-Truth Politics, pp. 253 - 265Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abramson, Kate. “Turning Up the Lights on Gaslighting.” Philosophical Perspectives 28 (2014): 1–30.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. Social Justice in the Liberal State. Vol. 401. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
Anker, Elisabeth R. Orgies of Feeling: Melodrama and the Politics of Freedom. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Anker, Elizabeth S., and Felski, Rita. “Introduction.” In Critique and Postcritique, edited by Anker, Elizabeth S. and Felski, Rita, 1–28. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smst2.3.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition: Second Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1973.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Aristotle’s Poetics. Translated by James Hutton. 1st ed. New York: Norton, 1982.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Politics, and the Constitution of Athens. Edited by Everson, Stephen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. “A Plea for Excuses.” In Philosophical Papers, 3rd ed., edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock, 175–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words: Second Edition. Edited by Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, Marina. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Baker, Gordon P., and Hacker, P. M. S.. Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Barker, Derek W. M., and McIvor, David W.. “Tragedy and Politics.” In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, 1–10. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept1009.Google Scholar
Baron, Ilan Zvi. How to Save Politics in a Post-Truth Era: Thinking through Difficult Times. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Rustle of Language. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Barton, Russell, and Whitehead, J. A.. “The Gas-Light Phenomenon.” The Lancet 293, no. 7608 (1969): 1258–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Stanley. “Stanley Cavell and Ethics.” In Stanley Cavell, edited by Eldridge, Richard, 15–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
BBC News. “Trump Deliberately Played down Virus, Woodward Book Says,” September 10, 2020, sec. US & Canada. www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54094559.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty, 118–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Blau, Adrian, ed. Methods in Analytical Political Theory. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Harold. “Mr. America.” The New York Review of Books, November 22, 1984. www.nybooks.com/articles/1984/11/22/mr-america/.Google Scholar
Boswell, John, Corbett, Jack, and Havercroft, Jonathan. “Politics and Science as a Vocation: Can Academics Save Us from Post-Truth Politics?” Political Studies Review 18, no. 4 (2020): 575–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929919875065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, Peter. “Don’t Look Up Review: Slapstick Apocalypse According to DiCaprio and Lawrence.” The Guardian, December 8, 2021. sec. Film. www.theguardian.com/film/2021/dec/08/dont-look-up-review-slapstick-apocalypse-according-to-dicaprio-and-lawrence.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter. The Melodramatic Imagination: Balzac, Henry James, Melodrama, and the Mode of Excess. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. 1st ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Calef, Victor, and Weinshel, Edward M.. “Some Clinical Consequences of Introjection: Gaslighting.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 50, no. 1 (1981): 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1981.11926942.Google Scholar
Cantor, Paul. “Leo Strauss’s Interpretive Methods.” In Approaches to Political Thought, edited by William L. Richter, 55–63. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “Editorial Notes: A Reply to Tania Modleski.” Critical Inquiry 17, no. 1 (1990): 238–44.Google Scholar
Cawthra, R., O’Brien, G., and Hassanyeh, F.. “‘Imposed Psychosis’: A Case Variant of the Gaslight Phenomenon.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 150, no. 4 (1987): 553–56.Google Scholar
Chen, Shawna. “Donald Trump, Expert.” POLITICO Magazine, September 3, 2019. https://politi.co/3101PBy.Google Scholar
Choat, Simon. “Decolonising the Political Theory Curriculum.” Politics 41, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720957543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CNN.Com. “Roberts: ‘My Job Is to Call Balls and Strikes and Not to Pitch or Bat’.” September 12, 2005. https://edition.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/12/roberts.statement/.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marshall. “Must We Mean What We Say?: On the Life and Thought of Stanley Cavell.” Los Angeles Review of Books. April 27, 2019. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/must-we-mean-what-we-say-on-the-life-and-thought-of-stanley-cavell/.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. Identity\Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Exp. ed. Rev. ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. Vol. 23. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Timothy, and White, Patricia. The Film Experience: An Introduction. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2004.Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon. “Being and Time, Part 4: Thrown into This World.” The Guardian, June 29, 2009. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/29/religion-philosophy.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan D. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Spurs: Nietzsche’s Styles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Discourse on Method and the Meditations. Translated by F. E. Sutcliffe. Penguin Classics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Dienstag, Joshua Foa. “The Tragedy of Remarriage: Letter to M. Cavell about Cinema (A Remake).” In Cinema, Democracy and Perfectionism, edited by Joshua Foa Dienstag, 2–81. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, Mary Ann. The Desire to Desire. Vol. 27. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Duca, Lauren. “Donald Trump Is Gaslighting America | Teen Vogue.” Teen Vogue, December 10, 2016. www.teenvogue.com/story/donald-trump-is-gaslighting-america.Google Scholar
Dumm, Thomas L. “Cordelia’s Calculus: Love and Loneliness in Cavell’s Reading of Lear.” In The Claim to Community, edited by Norris, Andrew, 212–35. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Embury-Dennis, Tom. “Trump Forced to Deny Personally Doctoring Hurricane Map after Sharpie Spotted on His Desk.” The Independent, September 5, 2019. www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-map-hurricane-dorian-sharpie-fake-doctored-alabama-noaa-storm-a9092521.html.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Compensation.” In The Portable Emerson, edited by Bode, Carl and Cowley, Malcolm, 165–86. New York: Penguin Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Divinity School Address.” In The Portable Emerson, edited by Bode, Carl and Cowley, Malcolm, 72–91. New York: Penguin Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Experience.” In The Portable Emerson, edited by Bode, Carl and Cowley, Malcolm, 266–90. New York: Penguin Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “History.” In The Portable Emerson, edited by Bode, Carl and Cowley, Malcolm, 115–37. New York: Penguin Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Self-Reliance.” In The Portable Emerson, edited by Bode, Carl and Cowley, Malcolm, 138–64. New York: Penguin Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “The American Scholar.” In The Portable Emerson, edited by Bode, Carl and Cowley, Malcolm, 51–71. New York: Penguin Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Falomi, Matteo. “Perfectionism and Moral Reasoning.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy II, no. 2 2010: 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fear, David. “‘Don’t Look Up’ … or You Might See One Bomb of a Movie Hurtling Right Toward You.” Rolling Stone (blog), December 24, 2021. www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-reviews/dont-look-up-review-leonardo-dicaprio-jennifer-lawrence-1268779/.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Fischer, Michael. Stanley Cavell and Literary Skepticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard. “Perfectionism without Perfection: Cavell, Montaigne, and the Conditions of Morals and Politics.” In The Claim to Community: Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy, edited by Norris, Andrew, 98–127. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Forrester, Katrina. In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer. Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics. Cambridge, MA: Polity, 2014.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” In The Foucault Reader, edited by Rabinow, Paul, 101–20. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “Splitting of the Ego in the Process of Defence.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXIII (1937–1939): Moses and Monotheism, An Outline of Psycho-Analysis and Other Works, 271–78, 1964.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “The Unconscious.” In The Freud Reader, edited by Gay, Peter, 572–84. New York: Vintage, 1995.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael. Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Beth, Millie, Arora, and Brendan, Muha. “How to Talk to QAnon Loved Ones This Thanksgiving.” November 24, 2021. https://slate.com/technology/2021/11/thanksgiving-qanon-family-behavioral-science.html.Google Scholar
Gould, Timothy. Hearing Things: Voice and Method in the Writing of Stanley Cavell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
The Guardian. “Older People Would Rather Die than Let Covid-19 Harm US Economy – Texas Official,” March 24, 2020. www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/24/older-people-would-rather-die-than-let-covid-19-lockdown-harm-us-economy-texas-official-dan-patrick.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. Social Inquiry after Wittgenstein & Kuhn: Leaving Everything as It Is. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Hammer, Espen. Stanley Cavell: Skepticism, Subjectivity, and the Ordinary. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Polity, 2002.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan. Captives of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan. “On Seeing Liberty As.” In The Grammar of Politics: Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy, edited by Heyes, Cressida, 149–67. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan. “Skinner, Wittgenstein and Historical Method.” Paragraph 34, no. 3 (2011): 371–87. https://doi.org/10.3366/para.2011.0031.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan. “The Injustices of Global Justice.” European Journal of Political Theory 22, no. 1 (2023): 161–70.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan, Eisler, Jacob, Shaw, Jo, Wiener, Antje, and Napoleon, Val. “Decolonising Global Constitutionalism.” Global Constitutionalism 9, no. 1 (2020): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381720000039.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan, and Owen, David. “Soul-Blindness, Police Orders and Black Lives Matter: Wittgenstein, Cavell, and Rancière.” Political Theory 44, no. 6 (2016): 739–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591716657857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Reprint. Oxford Paperbacks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time: A Translation of Sein Und Zeit. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. SUNY Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Heyes, Cressida J. Line Drawings: Defining Women through Feminist Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko. “Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference of Performance?” In Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Doney, Willis, 108–40. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. New ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Hobbes: Leviathan: Revised Student Edition. Edited by Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hollingdale, R. J. Nietzsche: The Man and His Philosophy. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. “Declarations of Independence: Arendt and Derrida on the Problem of Founding a Republic.” The American Political Science Review 85, no. 1 (1991): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962880.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. Democracy and the Foreigner. New ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. Shell-Shocked: Feminist Criticism after Trump. 1st ed. New York: Fordham University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary. Edited by Miller, Eugene F.. Rev. ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1987.Google Scholar
Ibsen, Henrik. “A Doll’s House.” In Four Great Plays by Ibsen, edited by Gassner, John, translated by R. Farquharson Sharp. New York: Bantam Books, 1959.Google Scholar
Illing, Sean. “The People’s Tyrant: What Plato Can Teach Us about Donald Trump.” Vox, November 7, 2016. www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/7/13512960/donald-trump-plato-democracy-tyranny-fascism-2016-elections.Google Scholar
The Independent. “What Goes up, Must Come down: Why It’s OK to Hate Don’t Look Up,” January 2, 2022. www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/dont-look-up-netflix-adam-mckay-b1984534.html.Google Scholar
Jackson, Larry. “A Different Path: Why Stanley Cavell Won’t Get to the Point.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 29, no. 4 (2015): 503–21. https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.29.4.0503.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lea. The Wages of Sin: Censorship and the Fallen Woman Film, 1928–1942. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jeweller Magazine. Apple’s “Think Different” Campaign – 1997, 2012. www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKS0EIyevSU.Google Scholar
Jung, Hwa Yol. “Leo Strauss’s Conception of Political Philosophy: A Critique.” The Review of Politics 29, no. 4 (1967): 492–517. www.jstor.org/stable/1405723.Google Scholar
Jung, Hwa Yol. “Kagan: ‘Umpire’ Metaphor Suggests Judges Are Robots – POLITICO.” www.politico.com/blogs/politico-now/2010/06/kagan-umpire-metaphor-suggests-judges-are-robots-027873.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Max Müller and Marcus Weigelt. New York: Penguin Classics, 2008.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kant: Political Writings. Edited by Brinton, Donna M. and Goodwin, Janet M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. “Clouds of Not Knowing.” The Times Literary Supplement, April 18, 1980. The Times Literary Supplement Historical Archive. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/EX1200536114/TLSH?u=unisoton&sid=zotero&xid=0277dd3a.Google Scholar
Kompridis, Nikolas. Critique and Disclosure (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought): Critical Theory between Past and Future. Repr. ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Koomen, Jonneke. “International Relations/Black Internationalism: Reimagining Teaching and Learning about Global Politics.” International Studies Perspectives 20, no. 4 (2019): 390–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekz008.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kutcher, Stanley P. “The Gaslight Syndrome.” The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 27, no. 3 (1982): 224–27.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. Liberalism, Community, and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd ed. London: Verso, 2001.Google Scholar
Laden, Anthony Simon. Reasoning: A Social Picture. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. “Agreement and Consent in Kant and Habermas: Can Kantian Constructivism Be Fruitful for Democratic Theory?” The Philosophical Forum 43, no. 3 (2012): 277–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2012.00425.x.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène, Panagia, Davide, and Zerilli, Linda M. G.. “Judging Politically: Symposium on Linda M. G. Zerilli’s A Democratic Theory of Judgment, University of Chicago Press, 2016.” Political Theory 46, no. 4 (2018): 611–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591718762347.Google Scholar
LaPlace, Maria. “Producing and Consuming the Woman’s Film: Discursive Struggle in Now, Voyager.” In Home Is Where the Heart Is: Studies in Melodrama and the Woman’s Film, edited by Gledhill, Christine, 138–66. London: British Film Institute, 1987.Google Scholar
Law, Tara, and Martinez, Gina. “NOAA Sided with President Trump over Hurricane Dorian and Alabama. Here’s a Full Timeline of the Controversy.” Time, September 8, 2019. https://time.com/5671606/trump-hurricane-dorian-alabama/.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Laslett, Peter. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lowensohn, Josh. “Steve Jobs in PBS Doc: You Can Change the World.” CNET, November 2, 2011. www.cnet.com/news/steve-jobs-in-pbs-doc-you-can-change-the-world/.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. Differend: Phrases in Dispute. 1st ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Norman. Thought and Knowledge: Essays. 1st ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. The Communist Manifesto. Edited by Moore, Samuel. London: Penguin Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham Harold. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50, no. 4 (1943): 370–96.Google Scholar
McCormack, Rob. “Philosophical Writing: Prefacing as Professing.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 40, no. 7 (2008): 832–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00377.x.Google Scholar
McGee, Micki. Self-Help, Inc.: Makeover Culture in American Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Menke, Christoph. Tragic Play: Irony and Theater from Sophocles to Beckett. Columbia Themes in Philosophy, Social Criticism, and the Arts. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty, Utilitarianism and Other Essays. Edited by Philp, Mark and Rosen, Frederick. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2015.Google Scholar
Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz. “Hegel’s Antigone.” The Owl of Minerva, October 1, 1986. https://doi.org/10.5840/owl19861728.Google Scholar
Milton, John. The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015.Google Scholar
Modleski, Tania. “Editorial Notes: Response to Stanley Cavell.” Critical Inquiry 17, no. 1 (1990): 237–38.Google Scholar
Modleski, Tania. Feminism without Women: Culture and Criticism in a “Postfeminist” Age. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies after Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Monty Python. Argument Clinic – Monty Python – The Secret Policeman’s Balls, 2009. www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkQhK8O9Jik.Google Scholar
Moore, George Edward, and Baldwin, Thomas. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Morefield, Jeanne. Empires without Imperialism: Anglo-American Decline and the Politics of Deflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Mothersill, Mary. “Review of Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays by Stanley Cavell; The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film, by Stanley Cavell; The Senses of Walden, by Stanley Cavell”. The Journal of Philosophy 72, no. 2 (1975): 27–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025262.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. “Introduction.” In The Cavell Reader, 1–21. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. “On Refusing to Begin.” In Contending with Stanley Cavell, edited by Goodman, Russell B., 22–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. Stanley Cavell: Philosophy’s Recounting of the Ordinary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Myokyo-ni. “Naturalization Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America.” USCIS, July 5, 2020. www.uscis.gov/citizenship/learn-about-citizenship/the-naturalization-interview-and-test/naturalization-oath-of-allegiance-to-the-united-states-of-america.Google Scholar
NBC News. Kellyanne Conway: Press Secretary Sean Spicer Gave “Alternative Facts” | Meet The Press | NBC News, 2017. www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSrEEDQgFc8.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Untimely Meditations. Edited by Stern, J. P.. Translated by R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. On the Genealogy of Morality. Edited by Ansell-Pearson, Keith. Translated by Carol Diethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings. Edited by Geuss, Raymond and Speirs, Ronald. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Norris, Andrew. Becoming Who We Are: Politics and Practical Philosophy in the Work of Stanley Cavell. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Andrew. “Political Revisions: Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy.” Political Theory 30, no. 6 (2002): 828–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591702238205.Google Scholar
Norval, Aletta J. Aversive Democracy: Inheritance and Originality in the Democratic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Norval, Aletta J. “Moral Perfectionism and Democratic Responsiveness: Reading Cavell with Foucault.” Ethics & Global Politics 4, no. 4 (2011): 207–29. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v4i4.14448.Google Scholar
Norval, Aletta J. “‘Writing a Name in the Sky’: Rancière, Cavell, and the Possibility of Egalitarian Inscription.” The American Political Science Review 106, no. 4 (2012): 810–26. www.jstor.org/stable/23357710.Google Scholar
NowThis News. “Nobody Knows More” Than Trump About Anything: A Supercut | NowThis, 2020. www.youtube.com/watch?v=sR3f95BGIiA.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. “Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 39, no. 1 (2011): 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01200.x.Google Scholar
Nyiri, J. C. “Wittgenstein’s Later Work in Relation to Conservatism.” In Wittgenstein and His Times, edited by Kenny, A. and McGuinness, B.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981.Google Scholar
Owen, David. “Cultural Diversity and the Conversation of Justice: Reading Cavell on Political Voice and the Expression of Consent.” Political Theory 27, no. 5 (1999): 579–96.Google Scholar
Owen, David. “Perfectionism, Parrhesia, and the Care of the Self: Foucault and Cavell on Ethics and Politics.” In The Claim to Community: Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy, edited by Andrew Norris, 128–55. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Owen, David. “Political Philosophy in a Post-Imperial Voice: James Tully and the Politics of Cultural Recognition.” Economy and Society 28, no. 4 (1999): 520–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149900000016.Google Scholar
Panagia, Davide. “A Theory of Aspects: Media Participation and Political Theory.” New Literary History 45, no. 4 (2014): 527–48.Google Scholar
Panagia, Davide. “Blankets, Screens, and Projections: Or, the Claim of Film.” In The Aesthetic Turn in Political Thought, edited by Kompridis, Nikolas, 229–62. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
Panagia, Davide. “Why Film Matters to Political Theory.” Contemporary Political Theory 12, no. 1 (2013): 2–25.Google Scholar
Patton, Paul. “Cavell and Rawls on the Conversation of Justice: Moral versus Political Perfectionism.” Conversations: The Journal of Cavellian Studies, no. 2 (2014): 54–74.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Social and Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Plato. “Euthyphro.” In The Last Days of Socrates, translated by Hugh Trendennick, 17–41. New York: Penguin Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Plato. Republic. Translated by G. M. A. Grube. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1992.Google Scholar
Plotica, Luke Philip. “‘This Is Simply What I Do’: Wittgenstein and Oakeshott on the Practices of Individual Agency.” The Review of Politics 75, no. 1 (2013): 45–68. www.jstor.org/stable/23355714.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. The History of Scepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Protevi, John. Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Translated by Julie Rose. 1st ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “Two Concepts of Rules.” The Philosophical Review 64, no. 1 (1955): 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182230.Google Scholar
Richter, William L., ed. Approaches to Political Thought. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Robin, Corey. “Sheldon Wolin, 1922–2015.” https://coreyrobin.com/2015/10/23/sheldon-wolin-1922-2015.Google Scholar
Robinson, Christopher. Wittgenstein and Political Theory: The View from Somewhere. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America. New ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. “From Epistemology to Romance: Cavell on Skepticism.” The Review of Metaphysics 34, no. 4 (1981): 759–74. www.jstor.org/stable/20127572.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. “Philosophy as a Kind of Writing: An Essay on Derrida.” New Literary History 10, no. 1 (1978): 141–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/468309.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Matthew. “A QAnon Supporter Is Headed to Congress.” The New York Times, November 4, 2020, sec. U.S. www.nytimes.com/2020/11/03/us/politics/qanon-candidates-marjorie-taylor-greene.html.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. “On the Social Contract.” In Rousseau: Basic Political Writings, edited by Cress, D. A., 141–220. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Schiff, Jade Larissa. Burdens of Political Responsibility: Narrative and the Cultivation of Responsiveness. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political: Expanded Edition. Translated by George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schoolman, Morton. “Series Editor’s Introduction.” In Emerson and Self-Reliance, ix–xxii. New York: SAGE, 1995.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Edited by Gill, Roma. New ed. Oxford School Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Othello. Edited by Professor Cedric Watts and Keith Carabine. Annot. ed. Ware: Wordsworth Editions, 1992.Google Scholar
Sher, George. Beyond Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics: Regarding Method. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, Charles G., and Sinanan, Kenneth. “The ‘Gaslight Phenomenon’ Reappears: A Modification of the Ganser Syndrome.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 120, no. 559 (1972): 685–86.Google Scholar
Spear, Andrew D. “Epistemic Dimensions of Gaslighting: Peer-Disagreement, Self-Trust, and Epistemic Injustice.” Inquiry 66, no. 1 (2019): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1610051.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. “On a Forgotten Kind of Writing.” Chicago Review 8, no. 1 (1954): 64–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/25293010.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. “Persecution and the Art of Writing.” Social Research 8, no. 4 (1941): 488–504. www.jstor.org/stable/40981803.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. “What Is Political Philosophy?” The Journal of Politics 19, no. 3 (1957): 343–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2126765.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. What Is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Strong, Tracy B. Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of Transfiguration. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Strong, Tracy B. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Politics of the Ordinary. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Strong, Tracy B. Politics without Vision: Thinking without a Banister in the Twentieth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, Tracy B. “Truth, Facts, Alternates and Persons: Or, Whatever Has Happened to Post-Modernism.” In Post-Truth, Philosophy and Law, edited by Condello, Angela and Andina, Tizina, 136–54. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Strong, Tracy B., and Lima, Joseph. “Telling the Dancer from the Dance: On the Relevance of the Ordinary for Political Thought.” In The Claim to Community: Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy, edited by Norris, Andrew, 58–79. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Andrew. “America Has Never Been So Ripe for Tyranny.” Intelligencer, May 2, 2016. http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/04/america-tyranny-donald-trump.html.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Philosophical Papers: Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism, edited by Gutmann, Amy, 25–73. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Temelini, Michael. “Learning Politics by Means of Examples.” In A Companion to Wittgenstein on Education: Pedagogical Investigations, edited by Peters, Michael A. and Stickney, Jeff, 287–303. Singapore: Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
Temelini, Michael. Wittgenstein and the Study of Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Terry, Brandon M. “Conscription and the Color Line: Rawls, Race and Vietnam.” Modern Intellectual History, March 9, 2021, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244320000463.Google Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. The Heart of Judgment: Practical Wisdom, Neuroscience, and Narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Thoreau, Henry David. “Walden.” In The Portable Thoreau, edited by Bode, Carl, 258–572. New York: Penguin Books, 1975.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Edited by Lawrence, George. Translated by J. P. Mayer. New York: Harper Perennial, 1995.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and Government 1572–1651: 26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Tully, James. An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Edited by Skinner, Quentin. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Tully, James. Public Philosophy in a New Key: Volume 1, Democracy and Civic Freedom. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Tully, James. Public Philosophy in a New Key: Volume 2, Imperialism and Civic Freedom. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Tully, James. “Struggles over Recognition and Distribution.” Constellations 7, no. 4 (2000): 469–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. “The Pen Is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner’s Analysis of Politics.” British Journal of Political Science 13, no. 4 (1983): 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400003379.Google Scholar
Vetter, David. “Why Sneering Critics Dislike Netflix’s ‘Don’t Look Up,’ But Climate Scientists Love It.” Forbes. Accessed April 7, 2022. www.forbes.com/sites/davidrvetter/2021/12/28/why-sneering-critics-dislike-netflixs-dont-look-up-but-climate-scientists-love-it/.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. “Socratic Irony.” The Classical Quarterly 37, no. 1 (1987): 79–96. www.jstor.org/stable/639346.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Washington Post. “Text: President Bush Addresses the Nation.” September 20, 2001. www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/specials/attacked/transcripts/bushaddress_092001.html.Google Scholar
Weber, Désirée. “A Pedagogic Reading of Wittgenstein’s Life and Later Works.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 53, no. 4 (2019): 688–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12390.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, Roger. “Understanding the Abortion Argument.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 1, no. 1 (1971): 67–95. www.jstor.org/stable/2265092.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Shame and Necessity. Sather Classical Lectures, v. 57. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Williams, Linda. “‘Something Else besides a Mother’: ‘Stella Dallas’ and the Maternal Melodrama.” Cinema Journal 24, no. 1 (1984): 2–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1225306.Google Scholar
Wimstatt, W. K., and Beardesly, Monroe C.. “The Intentional Fallacy.” In On Literary Intention, edited by Molina, David Newton-De, 1–13. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. New ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. On Certainty. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M and von Wright, G. H.. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 2001.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. “Paradigms and Political Theories.” In Approaches to Political Thought, edited by Richter, William L., 140–57. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. “Political Theory as a Vocation.” The American Political Science Review 63, no. 4 (1969): 1062–82. www.jstor.org/stable/1955072.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda M. G. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda M. G. “Doing without Knowing: Feminism’s Politics of the Ordinary.” Political Theory 26, no. 4 (1998): 435–58. www.jstor.org/stable/192199.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda M. G. “Doing without Knowing: Feminism’s Politics of the Ordinary.” In The Grammar of Politics: Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy, edited by Heyes, Cressida, 129–48. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar