Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Introduction: social comparison processes and levels of analysis
- Part 1 Cognition: comparison processes within and between individuals
- 1 Social comparison orientation: a new perspective on those who do and those who don't compare with others
- 2 The why, who, and how of social comparison: a social-cognition perspective
- 3 Autobiographical memory, the self, and comparison processes
- 4 Comparing oneself over time: the temporal dimension in social comparison
- Part 2 Intergroup relations: comparison processes within and between groups
- Part 3 Culture: comparison processes within and across cultures
- Author index
- Subject index
- References
1 - Social comparison orientation: a new perspective on those who do and those who don't compare with others
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Introduction: social comparison processes and levels of analysis
- Part 1 Cognition: comparison processes within and between individuals
- 1 Social comparison orientation: a new perspective on those who do and those who don't compare with others
- 2 The why, who, and how of social comparison: a social-cognition perspective
- 3 Autobiographical memory, the self, and comparison processes
- 4 Comparing oneself over time: the temporal dimension in social comparison
- Part 2 Intergroup relations: comparison processes within and between groups
- Part 3 Culture: comparison processes within and across cultures
- Author index
- Subject index
- References
Summary
Social comparison as an individual difference characteristic
Social comparison – how we use others to make sense of ourselves and our social world – is a focal human concern. Indeed, scholars have long recognized the importance of social comparison for human adaptation and survival. As Suls and Wheeler (2000) have noted, theorizing and research on social comparison can be traced to some of the classic contributions to western philosophy and to pivotal work in social psychology and sociology, including work on the self, adaptation level, reference groups, and social influence. In many respects, it is a fundamental human social interaction process.
Nevertheless, it was not until Festinger's (1954) classic paper that the term social comparison was proposed. According to Festinger, “There exists, in the human organism, a drive to evaluate his opinions and abilities.” (p. 117) Although they generally do not like the term “drive,” most social psychologists would probably agree that the desire to learn about the self through comparison with others is a universal characteristic of humans. As P. Gilbert, Price, and Allan (1995) noted, social comparison is phylogenetically very old, biologically very powerful, and is recognizable in many species. Indeed, it has been suggested that the process of social comparison has an evolutionary basis, and stems from the need to assess one's power and strength compared to that of one's competitors. In the course of evolution, this tendency to compare oneself with others has undoubtedly increased as humans came to live in larger groups.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Comparison and Social PsychologyUnderstanding Cognition, Intergroup Relations, and Culture, pp. 15 - 32Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
- 28
- Cited by