Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:19:44.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Edited by
Diane Brentari
Diane Brentari
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Sign Languages , pp. 618 - 669
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarons, D. (1994). Aspects of the Syntax of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Aarons, D., Bahan, B., Kegl, J. & Neidle, C. (1992). Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 15, 103–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarons, D., Bahan, B., Kegl, J. & Neidle, C. (1995). Lexical tense markers in American Sign Language. In Emmorey, K. & Reilly, J. S. (eds.), Language, Gesture and Space (pp. 225–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Abdel-Fattah, M. (2005). Arabic Sign Language: A perspective. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 212–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Aboh, E. O., Pfau, R. & Zeshan, U. (2005). When a wh-word is not a wh-word: The case of Indian Sign Language. In Bhattacharya, T. (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2005 (pp. 11–43). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Adamiec, T. (2003). Głuchoniemi i ich świadectwa życia od starożytności do końca XVIII wieku – przegląd problematyki. In Świdziński, M. & Gałkowski, T. (eds.), Studia nad Kompetencją Językową i Komunikacyjną Niesłyszących. Warsaw: Uniwersytet Warszawski.Google Scholar
Adams, M. (2003). Historia de la Educación de los Sordos en México y Lenguaje por Señas Mexicano. Spring Valley, CA: Fundación de Sordos Hispanos de San Diego.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J. (1991). Language Change: Progress or Decay? Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press.Google Scholar
Ajavon, P. A. (2003). The Incorporation of Nigerian Signs in Deaf Education in Nigeria: A Pilot Study. Frankfurt am Main. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ajello, R., Mazzoni, L. & Nicolai, F. (2001). Linguistic gestures: Mouthing in Italian Sign Language (LIS). In Braem, P. Boyes & Sutton-Spence, R. (eds.), The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as an Articulator in Sign Languages (pp. 231–246). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Akach, A. O. (1993). Squibbles barriers. Sign Post, 6(1), 2–4.Google Scholar
Aldersson, R. & McEntee-Atalinanis, L. J. (2007). A lexical comparison of Icelandic and Danish Sign Language. Birkbeck Studies in Applied Linguistics, 2, 41–67.Google Scholar
Aldrete, G. S. (1999). Gestures and Acclamations in Ancient Rome (Ancient Society and History). Baltimore, MD/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Alibašić Ciciliani, T. & Wilbur, R. B. (2006). Pronominal system in Croatian Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 9, 95–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alisedo, G. & Skliar, C. (1993). The influence of Italian oralism in Argentina. In Fischer, R. & Lane, H. (eds.), Looking Back: A Reader on the History of Deaf Communities and their Sign Languages (pp. 307–332). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Allen, G. D., Wilbur, R. B. & Schick, B. S. (1991). Aspects of rhythm in ASL. Sign Language Studies, 72, 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allott, R. (2000). Brain, Lexicon, Syntax. Rutgers, NJ: Language Origins Society.Google Scholar
,American School for the Deaf (1818). Second Report of the Directors of the Connecticut Asylum for the Education and Instruction of Deaf and Dumb Persons. 5. Hartford: American School for the Deaf.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. (1971). The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localist Theory. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ann, J. (1993). A linguistic investigation of the relationship between physiology and handshape. PhD dissertation. University of Arizona, Tucson.
Ann, J. (1998). Contact between a sign language and a written language: Character signs in Taiwan Sign Langauge. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Pinky Extension and Eye Gaze: Language Use in Deaf Communities (pp. 59–99). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Ann, J. (2006). Frequency of Occurrence and Ease of Articulation of Sign Language Handshapes: The Taiwanese example. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Aramburo, A. (1989). Sociolinguistic aspects of the Black Deaf community. In Lucas, C. (ed.), The Sociolinguistics of the Deaf Community (pp. 103–119). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, D. (1988a). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology, 5, 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, D. (1988b). Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology and Morphology. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Arends, J., Muysken, P. & Smith, N. (1995). Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.Google Scholar
Ariko, C. (2006). Deaf demand special news. The New Vision, March 28th Edition.
Aronoff, M., Meir, I. & Sandler, W. (2005). The paradox of sign language morphology. Language, 81(2), 301–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C. & Sandler, W. (2003). Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In Emmorey, K. (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 53–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Sandler, W. (2004). Morphological universals and the sign language type. In Booj, G. & Marle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2004 (pp. 19–39). Dordrecht/Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Sandler, W. (2008). The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. In Interaction Studies: A Special issue on Holophrasis vs. Compositionality in the Emergence of Protolanguage, 9(1), 131–150.Google Scholar
Arrotéia, J. (2003). Papel do marcador ‘aceno de cabeça’ em sentenças não-conônicas. Paper presented at III Seminário Internacional Abralin, UFRJ (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Rio de Janeiro.
Askins, D. & Perlmutter, D. (1995). Allomorphy explained through phonological representation: Person and number inflection of American Sign Language. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the German Linguistic Society, Gottingen.
Atkinson, J., Campbell, R., Marshall, J., Thacker, A. & Woll, B. (2004). Understanding “not”: Neuropsychological dissociations between hand and head markers of negation in BSL. Neuropsychologia, 42, 214–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avery, P. & Idsardi, W. (2001). Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In Hall, T. A. (ed.), Distinctive Feature Theory (pp. 41–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Babiński, G. (1998). Metodologiczne problemy badań etnicznych. Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy “NOMOS.” Google Scholar
Bahan, B. (1996). Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
Bahan, B., Kegl, J., Lee, R., MacLaughlin, D. & Neidle, C. (2000). The licensing of null arguments in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1970). Lectal groupings in matrices generated with waves along the temporal parameter. Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 214.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1971). Variation and language theory. Unpublished manuscript, Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Bailey, C. S. & Dolby, K. (2002). The Canadian Dictionary of ASL. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Baker, A. E. (2000). Official recognition of sign language in the Netherlands. Deaf Worlds, 16(2), 34–38.Google Scholar
Baker, A. E. & Hulst, H. (1996). Sign linguistics: Phonetics, phonology and morpho-syntax. Lingua, 98, 1–3.Google Scholar
Baker, A. E. & Woll, B. (eds.) (2009). Sign Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Baker, C. & Cokely, D. (1980). American Sign Language: A Teacher's Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. Silver Spring, MD: T. J. Publishers.Google Scholar
Baker, C. & Padden, C. (1978). Focusing on the non-manual components of American Sign Language. In Siple, P. (ed.), Understanding Language Through Sign Language Research (pp. 27–57). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baker-Shenk, C. (1983). A micro-analysis of the non-manual components of questions in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Baker-Shenk, A. E., Bogaerde, B. & Woll, B. (2005). Methods and procedures in sign language acquisition studies. Sign Language and Linguistics, 8(1/2), 7–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barakat, R. (1973). Arabic gestures. Journal of Popular Culture, 6, 749–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barasch, M. (1987). Giotto and the Language of Gesture. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnplantorna, , Riksförbundet för Barn med Cochleaimplantat och Barn med Hörapparat. (n.d.). Cochleaimplantat: en fantastisk möjlighet för döva att få höra. Available at www.barnplantora.se.
Basu, D. (2005). Verb compounds in Bangla: An event based analysis. Master's thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Bates, E., Benigni, L. Bretherton, I., Camioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1979). The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Battison, R. (1974). Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 5, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battison, R. (1978). Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press. Repr. 2003, Burtonsville, MD: Sign Media, Inc.Google Scholar
Battison, R., Markowicz, H. & Woodward, J. (1975). A good rule of thumb: Variable phonology in American Sign Language. In Fasold, R. W. & Shuy, R. W. (eds.), Analyzing Variation in Language (pp. 291–302). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, R. (2002). The quantitative paradigm. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (pp. 117–141). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bayley, R., & Lucas, C. (in press). Phonological variation in Louisiana ASL: An exploratory study. In Picone, M. & Davies, C. (eds.), Language Variety in the South: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Bayley, R. & Pease-Alvarez, L. (1997). Null pronoun variation in Mexican-descent children's narrative discourse. Language Variation and Change, 9, 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baynton, C. D. (1996). Forbidden Signs: American Culture and the Campaign Against Sign Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bébian, Roch-Ambroise A. (1825). Mimographie ou essai d´écriture mimique, propre à régulariser le langage des sourds-muets. Paris: Colas.Google Scholar
Beecken, A., Keller, J., Prillwitz, S. & Zienert, H. (1999). Grundkurs Deutsche Gebärdensprache. Lehrbuch Stufe 1. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Behares, L. E. & Massone, M. I. (1996). The sociolinguistics of Uruguayan and Argentinian deaf communities as a language-conflict situation. Journal of the Sociology of Language, 117, 99–113.Google Scholar
Bell, A. M. (1867). Visible Speech: The Science of Universal Alphabetics or Self-Interpreting Physiological Letters, for the Writing of All Languages in One Alphabet. London/New York: Simpkin, Marshall & Co.Google Scholar
Bell, A. M. (1881). Sounds and Their Relations: A Complete Manual of Universal Alphabetics, Illustrated by Means of Visible Speech. Salem, MA: J. P. Burbank.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. & Klima, E. (1982). From gesture to sign: Deixis in a visuo-gestural language. In Jarvella, R. J. & Klein, W. (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics (pp. 279–313). Chichester, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Benalcázar, O. (1994). Principles, changes, and current guidelines in the education of the Deaf. In Erting, C. J., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Snider, B. D. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conferences on Deaf Culture (pp. 127–128). Washington, DC: Gallaudet Unversity Press.Google Scholar
Benedicto, E. & Brentari, D. (2004). Where did all the arguments go?: Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22(4), 743–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenz, N. (1998). The case for Brazilian Sign Language: A deaf community finds its voice. In Kibbee, D. A. (ed.), Language Legislation and Linguistic Rights (pp. 269–287). Amsterdam/Philidelphia, PA: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenz, N. (2002). Insights into person deixis. Sign Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenz, N. (2003). Sudros venceremos: The rise of the Brazilian Deaf Community. In Monaghan, L., Schmaling, C., Nakamura, K. & Turner, G. (eds.), Many Ways to Be Deaf (pp. 173–193). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, B. (1979). Signed Swedish [translated from Tecnad svenska (1977)]. Stockholm: Liber Distribution.Google Scholar
Bergman, B. (1983). Studies in Swedish Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University.
Bergman, B. & Wallin, L. (1994). The study of sign language in society. In Erting, C., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. & Snider, B. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 309–330). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Bezzina, F. (n.d.). Niftiehmu bis-sinjali: Gabra mil-Lingwi tas-Sinjali Maltin. Malta: Gozo Association for the Deaf.
Bickford, A. (1991). Lexical variation in Mexican Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 72, 241–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biesold, H. (1999). Crying Hands: Eugenics and Deaf People in Nazi Germany. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Birch-Rasmussen, S. (1989). Lærebog i Mundhåndsystem. København: Døves Center for Total Kommunikation (KC).Google Scholar
Biritwum, R. B., Devres, J. P., Ofosu-Amaah, S., Marfo, C. & Essah, E. R. (2001). Prevalence of children with disabilities in central region. Ghana. West African Journal of Medicine, 20(3), 249–255.Google Scholar
Black, P. & Kruskal, J. (1997). Comparative lexicostatistics: A brief history and bibliography of key words. Available at www.ntu.edu.au/education/langs/ielex/BIBLIOG.html.
Blench, R. & Nyst, V. (2003). An unreported African sign language in Northeast Nigeria. OGMIOS Newsletter, Vol. 2.10, 22.Google Scholar
Blench, R. & Warren, A. (2005). An unreported African sign language for the deaf among the Bura in Northeast Nigeria. Available at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/roger_blench/Language%20data.htm.
Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, J. A. (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 206–244). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. (1995). Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Boeters, G. (1926). Lex Zwickau. Zeitschrift für Volksaufartung und Erbkunde, 1, 148–150.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J. (2003). The unique vector constraint. In Zee, E., & Slack, J. (eds.), Representing Direction in Language and Space (pp. 86–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Atunaño, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F. & Ameka, F. (2007). Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 83(3), 495–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and Its Parts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonvillian, R. J. & Folven, J. D. (1991). The transition from non-referential to referential language in children acquiring ASL development. Psychology, 25(5), 806–816.Google Scholar
Bonvillian, R. J. & Folven, J. D. (1993). Sign language acquisition: Developmental aspects. In Marschark, M. & Clark, D. M. (eds.), Psychological Perspective on Deafness (pp. 229–265). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bonvillian, R. J., Orlansky, M. D., Novack, L. L., Folven, R. J. & Wilcox, P. H. (1985). Language cognition and chirological development: The first steps in language acquisition. In Stokoe, W. & Volterra, V. (eds.), Sign Language Research '83: Proceedings of the III International Symposium on Sign Language Research (pp. 10–23). Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Bos, H. F. (1990). Person and location marking in SLN: Some implications of a spatially expressed syntactic system. In Prillwitz, S. & Vollhaber, T. (eds.), Current Trends in European Sign Language Research: Proceedings of the 3rd European Congress on Sign Language Research (pp. 231–246). Hamburg: Signum. (International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf; vol. 9)Google Scholar
Bos, H. F. (1993). Agreement and pro drop in sign language of the Netherlands. In Hengeveld, K. & Drijkoningen, F. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp. 37–48). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Associates. (AVT Publications; vol. 10)Google Scholar
Bos, H. F. (1994). An auxilary verb in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Ahlgren, I., Bergman, B. & Brennan, M. (eds.), Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers Presented from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research (SLR), Vol. I (pp. 37–53). Durham: International Sign Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Bos, H. F. (1995). Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Bos, H. F. & Schermer, G. M. (eds.), Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, Munich (pp. 121–148). Hamburg: Signum. (International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf; vol. 29)Google Scholar
Bošković, Z. & Lasnik, H. (2007). Minimalist Syntax: The Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. (1996). Sign language & language universals: The status of order & position in grammar. Sign Language Studies, 91, 99–139.Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. & Dubuisson, C. (1995). Grammar, order & position of wh-signs in Quebec Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 87, 99–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgerie, D. S. (1990). A quantitative study of sociolinguistic variation in Cantonese (China). PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Boyes Braem, P. (1990a). Acquisition of the handshape in American Sign Language: A preliminary analysis. In Volterra, V. & Erting, C. (eds.), From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children (pp. 107–127). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyes Braem, P. (1990b). Einführung in die Gebärdensprache und ihre Erforschung. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P. (1996). Eine Untersuchung über den Einfluß des Erwerbsalters auf die in der deutschsprachigen Schweiz verwendeten Formen von Gebärdensprache. Informationsheft Nr. 27. Zurich: Verein zur Unterstützung der Gebärdensprache der Gehörlosen.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P. (1999). Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of early and late learners of German Swiss Sign Language. Language and Speech, 42(2/3), 177–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyes Braem, P. (2001a). A multimedia bilingual database for the lexicon of Swiss German Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 4(1/2), 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyes Braem, P. (2001b). Functions of the mouthing component in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. In Brentari, D. (ed.), Foreign Vocabulary in Sign Language (pp. 1–47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P. (2001c). Functions of the mouthings in the signing of Deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language (DSGS). In Braem, P. Boyes & Sutton-Spence, R. (eds.), The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Language (pp. 99–131). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P. (2003–2005). Linguistic Descriptions of DSGS, as Printable Texts in the Four CD-ROMS. Zurich: Schweizerischer Gehörlosenbund-DS.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P. & Sutton-Spence, R. (2001). The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P., Pizzuto, E. & Volterra, V. (2002). The interpretation of signs by (hearing and deaf) members of different cultures. In Schulmeister, R. & Reinitzer, H. (eds.), Progress in Sign Language Research: In Honor of Siegmund Prillwitz (pp. 187–219). Hamburg: Signum. (International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf; vol. 40)Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P., Fournier, M. L., Rickli, F., Corazza, S., Franchi, M. L. & Volterra, V. (1990). A comparision of techniques for expressing semantic roles and locative relations in two different sign languages. In Edmondson, W. H. & Karlsson, F. (eds.), Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research (SLR 1987) (pp. 114–120). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P., Caramore, B., Herman, R. & Shores-Hermann, P. (2000). Romance and reality: Sociolinguistic similarities and differences between Swiss German Sign Language and Rhaeto-Romansh. In Monaghan, L. (ed.), Many Ways to BE Deaf: International Variation in Language, Identity and Ideology (pp. 89–113). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Branchini, C. & Donati, C. (2009). Relatively different: Italian Sign Language relative clauses in a typological perspective. In Liptàk, A. (ed.), Correlatives Cross-Linguistically (pp. 157–191). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braze, F. D. (2004). Aspectual inflection, verb raising, and object fronting in American Sign Language. Lingua, 114, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M. (1990). Word Formation in British Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Brennan, M. (1992). The visual world of BSL: An Introduction. In Brien, D. (ed.), Dictionary of British Sign Language/English (pp. 1–133). London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. (2005). Conjoining word and image in British Sign Language (BSL): An exploration of metaphorical signs in BSL. Sign Language Studies, 5, 360–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M. & Turner, G. (1994). Word-Order Issues in Sign Language. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Brentari, D. (1990). Theoretical foundations in American Sign Language phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
Brentari, D. (1998). A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, D. (2002). Modality differences in sign language phonology and morphophonemics. In Meier, R., Quinto, D. & Cormier, K. (eds.), Modality in Language and Linguistic Theory (pp. 35–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, D. (2005) The use of morphological templates to specify handshapes in sign languages. Linguistische Berichte, 13, 145–177.Google Scholar
Brentari, D. (in press). Sign language phonology. In Goldsmith, J., Yu, A. & Riggles, J. (eds.), Handbook of Phonological Theory. 2nd edn. Oxford/New York: Blackwell.
Brentari, D. & Crossley, L. (2002). Prosody on the hands and face: Evidence from American Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D. & Goldsmith, J. (1993). Secondary licensing and the non-dominant hand in ASL phonology. In Coulter, G. (ed.), Current Issues in ASL Phonology (pp. 19–41). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D. & Padden, C. A. (2001). Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In Brentari, D. (ed.), Foreign Vocabulary in Sign Languages (pp. 87–119). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brentari, D., González, C., Seidl, A. & Wilbur, R. (in press). Sensitivity to visual prosodic cues in signers and nonsigners. Language and Speech.
Brentari, D., Hulst, E., Kooij, & Sandler, W. (1996). [One] Over [All]; [All] Over [One]: A dependency phonology analysis of handshape in sign languages. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University, University of Connecticut and the University of Haifa.
Brenzinger, M., Heine, B. & Sommer, G. (1991). Language death in Africa. In Robins, R. H. & Uhlenbeck, E. M. (eds.), Endangered Languages (pp. 19–45). Oxford/New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Brien, D. (1992). Dictionary of British Sign Language/English. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. L. & Guede, N. (1964). No More For Ever: A Saharan Jewish Town. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum.Google Scholar
Brito, L. F. (1984). Similarities and differences in two Brazilian Sign Languages. Sign Language Studies, 42, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouland, J. (1855). Language Mimique: Spécimen d`un Dictionnaire des Signes. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Archives.Google Scholar
Bruce, V. & Green, P. (1990). Visual perception. In Physiology, Psychology, and Ecology. 2nd edn. London/Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brugman, H., Crasborn, O. & Russel, A. (2004). Collaborative annotation of sign language data with peer-to-peer technology. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), Lisbon.
Buhler, D. (2007). Friendships in Costa Rica: Mobility International USA. Available at www.miusa.org/ncde/stories/buhler.
Bühler, K. (1990). Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulwer, J. (1644). Chirologia: Or the Natural Language of the Hand. London: R. Whitaker.Google Scholar
Bulwer, J. (1648). Philocophus: Or the Deafe and Dumbe Man's Friend. London: Humphrey Moseley.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2003). A Minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua, 113, 967–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2003). Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In Tomasello, M. (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure (pp. 145–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Byun, K.-S. (2004). Gender marking in Korean Sign Language. Paper presented at the Mini-Conference on Sign Language Research, Nijmegen.
Callaway, A. (1998). Deaf children in China. China Review, Spring, 28–32.Google Scholar
Campos de Abreu, A. (1994). The Deaf social life in Brazil. In Erting, C. J., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Snider, B. D. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 114–116). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Caramore, B. (1988). Die Gebärdensprache in der Schweizerischen Gehörlosenpädagogik des 19. Jahrhunderts. Zurich, Hamburg: Verlag Hörgeschädigte Kinder.Google Scholar
Caramore, B. (1990). Sign language in the education of the deaf in 19th century Switzerland. In Prillwitz, S. & Vollhaber, T. (eds.), Current Trends in European Sign Language Research: Proceedings of the Third European Congress on Sign Language Research. Hamburg July 26–29, 1989 (pp. 23–34). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Carew, R. (1602). Survey of Cornwall. London: John Jaggard.Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Baquero, S. & Corina, D. (2008). Lexical processing in Spanish Sign Language (LSE). Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, C. & Mather, S. (1997). Movers & Shakers: Deaf People Who Changed the World. San Diego, CA: Dawn Sign Press.Google Scholar
Carty, B. (2000). John Carmichael: Australian Deaf pioneer. In Schembri, A., Napier, J., Beattie, R. & Leigh, G. R. (eds.), Proceedings of the Australasian Deaf Studies Research Symposium, Renwick College, Sydney, Australia (pp. 9–20). Sydney: North Rocks Press.Google Scholar
Carty, B. (2004). Managing their own affairs: The Australian deaf community during the 1920s and 1930s. PhD dissertation, Griffith University, Brisbane.
Caselli, M. C., Maragna, S. & Volterra, V. (2006). Linguaggio e sordità: Gesti, segni e parole nello sviluppo e nell'educazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Casey, S. (2003). “Agreement” in gestures and signed languages: The use of directionality to indicate referents involved in actions. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA.
Castberg, P. A. (1809). Om Tegn- eller Gebærde-Sproget med Hensyn paa dets Brug af Døvstumme og dets Anvendelighed ved deres Undervisning. Kiøbenhavn: Andreas Seidelin.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, C., Geraci, C. & Zucchi, S. (2006). Strategies of relativization in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 24, 945–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channon, R. (2002a). Signs are single segments: phonological representations and temporal sequencing in ASL and other sign languages. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Channon, R. (2002b). Beads on a string? Representations of repetition in spoken and signed languages. In Meier, R., Quinto, D. & Cormier, K. (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages (pp. 65–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheikh, E. B. (2007). Un apprentissage du langage des signes. Le Soleil, August 7.
Chen Pichler, Deborah. (2001). Word order variability and acquisition in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In Culicover, P., Wasow, T. & Akmajian, A. (eds.), Formal Syntax (pp. 71–132). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Lasnik, H. (1993). The theory of principles and parameters. In Jacobs, J., Stechow, A., Sternefeld, W., & Venneman, T. (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. I (pp. 506–569). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Repr. with minor revisions in Chomsky (1995).Google Scholar
Christensen, K. K. (1986). Norwegian ingen: A case of post-syntactic lexicalization. In Dahl, Ö. & Holmberg, A. (eds.), Scandinavian Syntax (pp. 21–35). Stockholm: Institute of Linguistics, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. (2001). Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In Hall, T. A. (ed.), Distinctive Feature Theory (pp. 71–146). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coates, J. Sutton-Spence, R. (2001). Turn taking patterns in deaf conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2, 2–34.Google Scholar
Coerts, J. (1990). The analysis of interrogatives and negation in SLN. In Prillwitz, S. & Vollhaber, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third European Congress on Sign Language Research. Hamburg (pp. 265–277). Hamburg: Signum. (International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf; vol. 9)Google Scholar
Coerts, J. (1992). Non-manual grammatical markers: An analysis of interrrogatives, negation and topicalizations in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Coerts, J. (1994). Constituent order in Sign Language of the Netherlands and the functions of orientations. In Ahlgren, I., Bergman, B. & Brennan, M. (eds.), Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium of Sign Language Research, Vol. I (pp. 69–88). Durham: International Sign Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Coerts, J. (2000). Early sign combinations in the acquisition of Sign Language of the Netherlands: Evidence for language-specific features. In Chamberlain, C. D., Morford, J. P. & Mayberry, R. I. (eds.), Language Acquisition by Eye (pp. 91–109). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cogill-Koez, D. (2000a). A model of signed language “classifier predicates” as templated visual representation. Sign Language and Linguistics, 3, 209–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogill-Koez, D. (2000b). Signed language classifier predicates: Linguistic structures or schematic visual representation? Sign Language and Linguistics, 3, 153–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S. (2004). Adverbial morphemes in tactile American Sign Language. PhD Dissertation, The Union Institute, Cincinnati, OH.
Collins, S. & Petronio, K. (1998). What happens in Tactile ASL? In Lucas, C. (ed.), Pinky Extension and Eye Gaze: Language Use in Deaf Communities (pp. 18–37). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. (Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, vol. 4)Google Scholar
Collins-Ahlgren, M. (1989). Aspects of New Zealand Sign Language. Doctoral Dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.
,Comité Prociegos y Sordos de Guatemala. (2006). Guatemala División de Educación. Available at www.prociegosysordos.org.gt/index.php?id=3.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coppola, M. (2002). The emergence of the grammatical category of Subject in home sign: Evidence from family-based gesture systems in Nicaragua. PhD dissertation: University of Rochester, NY.
Coppola, M. (2007). Gestures to signs: The origins of words in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Paper presented at the Workshop Current Issues in Sign Language Research, University of Köln, Köln.
Coppola, M. & Newport, E. L. (2005). Grammatical subjects in home sign: Abstract linguistic structure in adult primary gesture systems without linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 102(52), 19249–19253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppola, M. & So, W. C. (2005). Abstract and object-anchored deixis: pointing and spatial layout in adult homesign systems in Nicaragua. In Clark-Cotton, M. R., Brugos, A. & Ha, S. (eds.), BUCLD 29: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 144–155). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Coppola, M. & So, W. C. (2006). The seeds of spatial grammar: Spatial modulation and coreference in homesigning and hearing adults. In Bamman, D. T. M. & Zaller, C. (eds.), BUCLD 30: Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 119–130). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Corazza, S. (1993). The history of sign language in Italian education of the deaf. In Fischer, R. & Lane, H. (eds.), Looking Back: A Reader on the History of Deaf Communities and Their Sign Languages (pp. 219–229). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Corazza, S. (1997). La sezione ENS di Trieste. In Zuccalà, A. Z (ed.), Cultura del gesto e cultura della parola: Viaggio antropologico nel mondo dei sordi (pp. 107–112). Milan: Meltemi.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corina, D. P. (1993). To branch or not to branch: Underspecification in American Sign Language handshape contours. In Coulter, G. R. (ed.), Current Issues in ASL Phonology (pp. 63–95). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corina, D. P. & Sandler, W. (1990). Reassessing the role of sonority in syllable structure: Evidence from a visual-gestural language. In Ziolkowski, M., Noske, M. & Deaton, K. (eds.), Proceedings for the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 26; Vol. II: The Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology (pp. 33–43). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Corina, D. P. & Sandler, W. (1993). On the nature of phonological structure in sign language. Phonology, 10, 165–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corina, D. P., Bellugi, U. & Reilly, J. (1999). Neuropsychological studies of linguistic and affective facial expressions in deaf signers. Language and Speech, 42(2/3), 307–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cormier, K. (1998). Grammatical and anaphoric agreement in American Sign Language. Master's thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
Cormier, K. (2002). Grammaticization of indexic signs: How American Sign Language expresses numerosity. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Coulter, G. R. (1979). American Sign Language typology. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Coulter, G. R. (1993). Current Issues in American Sign Language Phonology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
,Council of Arab Ministers of Social Affairs (2004). Background paper on the international convention for the protection and promotion of the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities. Available at www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/contrib-arab1.htm.
Crain, R. C. (1996). Representing a sign as a single segment in American Sign Language. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 13 (ESCOL), University of New Brunswick, St. John.
Crasborn, O. (2001). Phonetic Implementation of Phonological Categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).Google Scholar
Crasborn, O. (2006). A linguistic analysis of the use of the two hands in sign language poetry. In Weijer, J. & Los, B. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2006 (pp. 65–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.Google Scholar
Crasborn, O. & Wit, M. (2005). Ethical implications of language standardization for sign language interpreters. In Mole, J. (ed.), International Perspectives on Interpreting: Selected Proceedings from the Supporting Deaf People Online Conferences 2001–2005 (pp. 41–150). Bassinton: Direct Learn Services.Google Scholar
Crasborn, O. & Kooij, E. (2003). Base joint configuration in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Phonetic variation and phonological specification. In Weijer, J. (ed.), The Phonological Spectrum. Vol. I: Segmental Structure (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, O., Hulst, H., & Kooij, E. (2001). SignPhon: A phonological database for sign language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 4(1/2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, O., Sloetjes, H., Auer, E. & Wittenburg, P. (2006). Combining video and numeric data in the analysis of sign language with the ELAN annotation software. In Vettori, E. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Lexicographic Matters and Didactic Scenarios (pp. 82–87). Paris: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar
Crasborn, O., Kooj, E., Waters, D., Woll, B. & Mesch, J. (2008). Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages. Sign Language and Linguistics, 11(1): 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T. (1992). An Introduction to Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1987). Child Language, Learning and Linguistics: An Overview for the Teaching and Therapeutic Professions. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1995). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croneberg, C. (1965a). Appendix C: The linguistic community. In Stokoe, W., Casterline, D. & Croneberg, C., The Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles (pp. 297–311). Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press. Repr. 1976.Google Scholar
Croneberg, C. (1965b). Appendix D: Sign Language dialects. In Stokoe, W., Casterline, D. & Croneberg, C., The Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles (pp. 313–319). Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press. Repr. 1976.Google Scholar
Cutkosky, M. R. (1989). On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 5(3), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuxac, C. (2000). La Langue des Signes Française: Les voies de l'iconicité. Paris: éditions Ophrys.Google Scholar
Czajkowska-Kisil, M. (2005). Dwujęzyczność w nauczaniu głuchych. Nauczyciel w Świecie Ciszy, 7, 3–9.Google Scholar
Dachkovsky, S. (2008). Facial expression as intonation in Israeli Sign Language: The case of neutral and counterfactual conditionals. In Quer, J. (ed.), Signs of the Time: Selected Papers from TISLR, 2004 (pp. 61–82). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. & Velupillai, V. (2008). Perfective/Imperfective aspect. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. & Comrie, B. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, Ch. 65. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available at http://wals.info/feature/65.Google Scholar
Dänzer, P., Hemmi, P. & Marco, E. (1997). Dance of Hands: The Renaissance of the Sign Language of the Deaf in Europe. Zürich: Etoile Productions.Google Scholar
,Deaf Society of New South Wales. (1989). Operation Knock Knock: A Profile of the Deaf Community of New South Wales. Parramatta, NSW: Deaf Society of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Jorio, A. (1832/2000). La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire Napoletano, Napoli: Fibreno 1832. Repr. Sala Bolognese: Arnaldo Forni, 1979. [Trans. Gesture in Naples and Gesture in Classical Antiquity, by Adam Kendon. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2000]Google Scholar
DeGraff, M. (1999). Language Creation and Language Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DeMatteo, A. (1977). Visual imagery and visual analogues in American Sign Language. In Friedman, L. (ed.), On the Other Hand (pp. 109–136). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
DeSantis, S. (1977). Elbow to Hand Shift in French and American Sign Languages. Paper presented at the Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
,Det Danske Bibelselskab (2004). Bibelske og liturgiske tekster på dansk tegnsprog. DVD. København, Denmark: Det Danske Bibelselskab.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M. (1981). Variation in British Sign Language. In Woll, B., Kyle, J. G. & Deuchar, M. (eds.), Perspectives on British Sign Language and Deafness (pp. 109–119). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M. (1983). Is BSL an SVO language? In Kyle, J. & Woll, B. (eds.), Language in Sign (pp. 69–76). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M. (1984). British Sign Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deverson, T. (1991). New Zealand lexis: The Maori dimension. English Today, 26, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Renzo, A. (2006). Le produzioni narrative in LIS di bambini e ragazzi sordi. Thesis, Università degli studi di Roma “La Sapienza,” Roma.
Diccionario Español-Lengua de Señas Mexicana (DIELSEME). (Dirección de Educación Especial en el Distrito Federal. 2004). México DF: SEP/Subsecretaría de Servicios Educativos para el Distrito Federal.
Diessel, H. (1999). Demonstratives: Form, Function & Grammaticalization: Typology Studies in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dively, V. (2001). Sign without hands: Nonhanded signs in American Sign Language. In Dively, V., Metzger, M., Taub, S. & Baer, A. M. (eds.), Sign Languages: Discoveries from International Research (pp. 62–73). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
,División de Educación. Benemérito comité Pro Ciegosy Sordos de Guatemala (2006). Available at www.prociegosysordos.org.gt/educacion.htm.
Dresher, B. E. (2003). Contrasts and asymmetries in inventories. In DiScuillo, A. M. (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. III: Morphology, Phonology, Acquisition (pp. 239–257). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, Q. (2007). The ASL Perfect Formed by Preverbal FINISH. American Sign Language Linguistic Research Project No. 14, Boston University.Google Scholar
Dugdale, P. O. (2000). Being Deaf in New Zealand: A case study of the Wellington Deaf community. PhD dissertation: Victoria University of Wellington.
Duncan, S. (2002). Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture, 2(2), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccarius, P. (2002). Finding common ground: A comparison of handshape across multiple sign languages. Master's thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Eccarius, P. (2008). A constraint-based account of handshape contrast in sign languages. PhD dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Eccarius, P. & Brentari, D. (2007). Symmetry and dominance: A cross-linguistic study of signs and classifier construction. Lingua, 117, 1169–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Edinburgh & East of Scotland Society for the Deaf. (1985). Seeing the Signs in Scotland. Edinburgh: Edinburgh & East of Scotland, Society for the Deaf.Google Scholar
Eckman, P., Friesen, W. V. & Hager, J. C. (2002). The Facial Action Coding System. Salt Lake City, UT: Research Nexus eBook.Google Scholar
Elton, F. & Squelch, L. (2008). British Sign Language: London and South East Regional Signs. London: Lexisigns.Google Scholar
Emmerik, W., Meyer, G., Hiddinga, A. & Pot, L. (1993). Poëzie in gebarentaal. Amsterdam: Nijghand van Ditma.Google Scholar
Emmerik, W., Meyer, G., Hiddinga, A. & Pot, L. (2005). Bewogen: Filmgedichten in Gebarentaal. The Netherlands: Stichting Geelprodukt.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. (1991). Repetition priming with aspect and agreement morphology in American Sign Language. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 20, 365–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmorey, K. (1999a). Do signers gesture? In Messing, L. S. & Campbell, R. (eds.), Gesture, Speech and Sign (pp. 133–159). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K. (1999b). The confluence of space and language in signed languages. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nodel, L. & Garrett, M. F. (eds.), Language and Space (pp. 171–209). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, Cognition and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. (2003). Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. & Corina, D. (1990). Lexical recognition in sign language: Effects of phonetic structure and morphology. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 1227–1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmorey, K. & Herzig, M. (2003). Categorical vs. gradient properties in classifer constructions in ASL. In Emmorey, K. (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 221–246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1993). Space in Danish Sign Language: The Semantics and Morphosyntax of the Use of Space in a Visual Language. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1994). Some simultaneous constructions in Danish Sign Language. In Brennan, M. & Turner, G. H. (eds.), Word-order Issues in Sign Language (pp. 73–87). Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1996). Iconicity and arbitrariness. In Engberg-Pedersen, E., Fortescue, M., Harder, P., Heltoft, L. & Jakobsen, L. Falster (eds.), Content, Expression and Structure: Studies in Danish Functional Grammar (pp. 453–468). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (2003). How composite is a fall? Adults' and childrens' descriptions of different types of falls in Danish Sign Language. In Emmorey, K. (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 311–332). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (2007). Internal structure: Backgrounding in classifier constructions. Paper presented at the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Workshop on Sign vs. Gesture, Rome.
Engberg-Pedersen, E. & Pedersen, A. (1983). Proforms in Danish Sign Language: Their use in figurative signing. In Stokoe, W. & Volterra, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the III International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Rome 1983 (pp. 202–209). Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press & Roma: Istituto di Psicologia CNR.Google Scholar
Falk, Y. (2006). Subjects and Universal Grammar. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faurot, K., Dellinger, D., Eatough, A. & Parkhurst, S. (1999). The identity of Mexican sign as a language. Unpublished manuscript. Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Feige, H.-U. (2006). Denn taube Personen folgen ihren thierischen Trieben … Leipzig: Gutenberg Verlag.Google Scholar
Feige, H.-U., Muhs, J., Vogel, H., Winkler, J. & Wolff, S. (2001). Leipziger Gespräche II “Wir machen Geschichte!” Deaf History im neuen Jahrtausend. Das Zeichen, 15(56), 316–322.Google Scholar
Felipe, T. (1989). A estrutura frasal na LSCB. IV Encontro Nacional da ANPOLL: Recife.Google Scholar
Ferreira-Brito, L. (1995). Por Uma Gramática das Línguas de Sinais. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp. 1–90). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. L. (1958). Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word, 14, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. & Vollhaber, T. (1996). Collage: Works on International Deaf History. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Fischer, R., Wempe, K., Lamprecht, S. & Seeberger, I. (1995). John E. Pacher (1842–1898) – ein “Taubstummer” aus Hamburg. (Teil I und II). Das Zeichen, 9(32)/9(33), 122–133/412–421.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. (1974). Sign language and linguistic universals. In Rohrer, T., & Ruwet, N. (eds.), Actes de Colloque Franco-Allemand de Grammaire Transformationelle (pp. 187–204). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. (1975). Influences on word order change in American Sign Language. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Word Order and Word Order Change (pp. 1–25). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. (1978). Sign language and creoles. In Siple, P. (ed.), Understanding Language Through Sign Language Research: Perspectives in Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics (pp. 309–331). New York/San Francisco, CA/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. (1996). The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign languages. Lingua, 98, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. (2006). Questions and negation in American Sign Language. In Zeshan, U. (ed.), Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Language: (pp. 165–197). Nijmegen: Ishara Press. (Sign Language Typology Series No. 1).Google Scholar
Fischer, S. (in preparation). Verb agreement in the Japanese sign language family. University of California, San Diego.
Fischer, S. & Gough, B. (1978). Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 7(18), 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. & Gough, B. (1999). Some Unfinished Thoughts on FINISH. Sign Language and Linguistics, 2, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. & Osugi, Y. (1998). Feature movement in Wh-questions: Evidence from sign languages. Paper presented at the Sixth Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference (TISLR 6), Washington, DC.
Fischer, S. & Osugi, Y. (2000). Thumbs up vs. giving the finger: Indexical classifiers in in NS and ASL. Paper presented at the Seventh Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 7), Amsterdam,.
Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, S. (1999). Open Minds, Open Hearts: Stories of the Australian Catholic Deaf Community. Lidcombe, NSW: CCOD.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T., Dejud, C., Klingler, C. & Lopez Mariscal, I. (2003). The changing paradigm of special education in Mexico: Voices from the field. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, C. M. (2002). How do deaf and hard of hearing students experience learning how to write using signwriting, a way to read and write signs? PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico. Available from University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI.
Flores-Ferrán, N. (2007). A bend in the road: Subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish after thirty years of sociolinguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 624–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, J. W. (1984). No Longer By Gaslight. Melbourne: Adult Deaf Society of Victoria.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1970). Three reasons for not deriving “kill” from “cause to die.” Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 429–438.Google Scholar
Folchi, A. & Mereghetti, E. (1995). Tre educatori sordi italiani. In Li Destri, G. P. & Volterra, V. (eds.), Passato e presente: Uno sguardo sull'educazione dei sordi in Italia (pp. 61–75). Napoli: Gnocchi.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1983). Preconceptual thinking in language (An essay in paleontology). In Grolier, E. D., Lock, A., Peters, C. R. & Wind, J. (eds.), Glossogenetics: The Origin and Evolution of Language (pp. 329–353). London: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Forman, W. (2003). The ABCs of New Zealand Sign Language: Aerial spelling. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(1), 92–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortgens, C. & Knoors, H. (1994). Distinguishing between Sign Language of the Netherlands and Sign-Supported Dutch. In Bogaerde, B., Knoors, H., & Verrips, M. (eds.), Language Acquisition with Non-Native Input (pp. 93–117). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. (Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development, 2)Google Scholar
Fortgens, C. (2003). Taalkeuze van dove kinderen [Language choice of deaf children]. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Gouda: Koninklijke Auris groep.
Foster, A. (1975). The social aspect of deafness: School years. Paper presented at the Seventh World Congress of the Deaf, Washington, DC.
Foucault, M. (2001). Les mailles du pouvoir. In Defert, D. & Ewald, F. (eds.), Dits et écrits II, 1976–1988 (pp. 1001–1020). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Franchi, M. L. (1987/2004). Componenti non manuali. In Volterra, V. (ed.), La Lingua Italiana dei Segni: La Comunicazione visivo, Gestuale dei Sordi. 2nd edn (pp. 159–177). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift: Eine der Arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprach des reinen Denkens. Halle: Verlag von Louis Nebert.Google Scholar
Fridman-Mintz, B. (2005). Tense and aspect inflections in Mexican Sign Language verbs. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Friedman, L. A. (1976). The manifestation of subject, object and topic in ASL. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 127–148). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. A. (1977). On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Frishberg, N. (1975). Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language, 51, 696–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frishberg, N. (1987). Ghanaian Sign Language. In Cleve, J. (ed.), Gallaudet Encyclopedia of Deaf People and Deafness, Vol. III, (pp. 778–779). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Frishberg, N. & Gough, B. (2000). Morphology in American Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 3(1), 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, V. & Rodman, R. (1998). An Introduction of Language. 6th edn. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College.Google Scholar
Fu, Y. & Mei, C. (1986). Longren Shouyu Gailun. Shanghai: Xuelin.Google Scholar
Fuchs, B. (2004). Phonetische Aspekte einer Didaktik der Finnischen Gebärdensprache als Fremdsprache. Jyväskylä, Finland. (Studies in Humanities, Vol. 21)Google Scholar
Fudge, E. (1969). Syllables. Journal of Linguistics, 5, 253–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fusellier-Souza, I. (2006). Emergence and development of signed languages: From a semiogenetic point of view. Sign Language Studies, 7(1), 30–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gałkowski, T., Kunicka-Kaiser, I. & Smoleńska, J. (1976). Psychologia Dziecka Głuchego. Warsaw: PIPS.Google Scholar
,Gambian Association of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (2002). Gambian Sign Language. Available at www.gadhoh.com/history.htm.
García, N. (1994). The art and culture of the Deaf. In Erting, C. J., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Snider, B. D. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 128–130). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Gascón Ricao, A. & Storch, Gracia y Asensio, J. G. (2004). Historia de la Educación de los Sordos en España y su Influencia en Europa y América. Madrid: Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.
Gasser, M. (2004). The origins of arbitrariness in language. In Forbus, K., Gentner, D. & Reiger, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Conference (pp. 434–439). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gasser, M., Sethuraman, N. & Hockema, S. (2005). Iconicity in expressives: An empirical investigation. In Rice, S. & Newman, J. (eds.), Experimental and Empirical Methods in Cognitive Functional Research (pp. 1–18). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI) Publications.Google Scholar
Gebhard, M. (2007). Hören lernen – hörbehindert bleiben: Die Geschichte der Gehörlosen- und Schwerhörigenorganisationen in den letzten 200 Jahren. Baden: hier+jetzt, Verlag für Kultur und Geschichte.Google Scholar
Geraci, C. (2006). Negation in LIS (Italian Sign Language). In Bateman, L. & Ussery, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 217–230). Amherst, MA: GLSA (Graduate Linguistic Student Association), University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Gerner de Garcia, B. (1995). Communication and language use of Spanish-speaking families with Deaf children. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities (pp. 221–252). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
,Ghanaian Sign Language. (~2001) Ghanaian National Association of the Deaf. Accra: Accra Catholic Press.Google Scholar
Gillian, R. & Easterbrook, S. (1997). Educating children who are deaf or hard of hearing: Residential life, ASL & Deaf culture. Available at www.ericdigests.org/1998–2/life.htm.
Giuranna, R. & Giuranna, G. (2000). Poesia in LIS: Iconicità e arbitrarietà, concreto e astratto. In Bagnara, C., Chiappini, G. & Conte, M. P. (eds.), Viaggio Nella Città Invisibile (pp. 341–348). Del Cerro: Pisa.Google Scholar
Giuranna, R. & Giuranna, G. (2003). Sette poesie in lingua dei segni italiana (LIS). CD-Rom. Pisa: Gdizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1991). Isomophism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language, 15, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goeke, A. (2006). Variation in American Sign Language: Articulator deletion in two-handed signs. Unpublished Master's thesis.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (1982). The resilience of recursion: A study of a communication system developed without a conventional language model. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art (pp. 51–77). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003a). Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003b). The Resilience of Language: What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us About How All Children Learn Language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesture, speech, and language. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago, IL.CrossRef
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Mylander, C. (1984). Gestural Communication in Deaf Children: The Effects and Noneffects of Parental Input on Early Language Development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, vol. 49. Boston, MA: Blackwell.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. [Published New York: Garland Press, 1979].
Goldsmith, J. (1995). Introduction: Phonotactics, alternations, contrasts; Representations, rules, levels. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.), Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 1–23). Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1966). Ritualized gesture and expression in art. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 251, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Q. (2005a). Shouyu wenti jianghua. In Shen, Y., Wu, A., & Chu, C. (eds.), Shuangyu Longjiaoyu de Lilun yu Shijian (pp. 39–60). Beijing: Huaxia.Google Scholar
Gong, Q. (2005b). Zhongguo longren yuyan ji yuyan jiaoyu wenti. In Shen, Y., Wu, A. & Chu, C. (eds.), Shuangyu Longjiaoyu de Lilun yu Shijian (pp. 61–90). Beijing: Huaxia.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. (2005). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Summer Institute of Linguistics. Available at www.ethnologue.com/.Google Scholar
Gras Ferrer, V. (2006). La comunidad sorda como comunidad lingüística: Panorama sociolingüístico de la/s lengua/s de signos en España. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona.
Green, F. (1783). Vox oculis subjecta. London: Benjamin White Publishers.Google Scholar
Green, L. (2004). Research on African American English since 1998. Journal of English Linguistics, 32, 210–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1957). Essays in Linguistics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1966). Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greftegreff, I. (1993). A few notes on anatomy and distinctive features in NTS handshapes. University of Trondheim, Working Papers in Linguistics, 17, 48–68. Dragvoll, Norway.Google Scholar
Grenoble, L. A. & Whaley, L. J. (2008). Saving Languages: An Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Groce, N. E. (1985). Everyone Here Spoke Sign Language: Hereditary Deafness on Martha's Vineyard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grose, D. 2008. The geometry of events: Evidence from English and ASL. PhD dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Grose, D., Wilbur, R. B. & Schalber, K. (2007). Events and telicity in classifier predicates: A reanalysis of body part classifier predicates in ASL. Lingua, 17, 1258–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Living with two languages and two cultures. In Parasnis, I. (ed.), Cultural and Language Diversity and the Deaf Experience (pp. 20–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grzegorzewska, M. 1964. Pedagogika specjalna. Warszawa: PIPS.Warsaw: PIPS Google Scholar
Guerra Currie, A.-M. (1999). A Mexican Sign Language lexicon: Internal and cross-linguistic similarities and variations. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Guerra Currie, A.-M. P., Meier, R. P. & Walters, K. (2002). A crosslinguistic examination of the lexicons of four signed languages. In Meier, R. P., Cormier, K. A. & Quinto-Pozos, D. (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages (pp. 224–236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guggenheim, L. (1993). Ethnic variation in ASL: The signing of African Americans and how it is influenced by conversational topic. In Winston, E. (ed.), Communication Forum (pp. 51–76). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Department of Linguistics and Interpreting.Google Scholar
Günther, K.-B. (2004). Der Hamburger Bilinguale Schulversuch – Ergebnisse, Perspektiven und offene Fragen. Hörgeschädigte Kinder, 41(2), 78–91.Google Scholar
Guy, G. R. (1980). Variation in the group and in the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space (pp. 1–36). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hagège, C. (1993). The Language Builder: An Essay on the Human Signature in Linguistic Morphogenesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagman, R. (1977). Nama Hottentot Grammar. Language Science Monographs, No. 15. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Publications.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1978). Conditionals are topics. Language, 54, 564–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J. (1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Language, 59, 781–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J. (1985). Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J. (1994). Ritualization and the Development of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J. (1998). Talk is Cheap: Sarcasm, Alienation, and the Evolution of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hairston, E. & Smith, L. (1983). Black and Deaf in America: Are We That Different? Silver Spring, MD: T. J. Publishers.Google Scholar
Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 53–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (2001). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hallahan, D. (1998). International perspectives on special education reform. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 13, 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1994). Some key features of distributed morphology. In Carnie, A. & Harley, H. (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21: Papers on Phonology and Morphology (pp. 275–288). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hamano, S. (1998). The Sound Symbolic System in Japanese. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI) Publications.Google Scholar
Hamzah, M. & Taffal, N. (1993). Lughah al-ishara al-Urduniyah al-Arabiyah. Amman, Jordan: Specialized Audiology Center.Google Scholar
Hänel, B. (2005). The acquisition of agreement in DGS: Early steps into a spatially expressed syntax. In Leuninger, H. & Happ, D. (eds.), Linguistische Berichte (Gebardensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Berwendung), Special Issue 13 (pp. 201–232).Google Scholar
Harder, R. (2003). Meervoud in de NGT. Manuscript, Nederlands Gebarencentrum.
Harder, R. & Schermer, G. M. (1986). A first analysis of handshapes in the Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Tervoort, B. T. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Sign Language Research, Amsterdam July 14–18, 1985 (pp. 47–51). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1983). Syllable Structure and Stress in Spanish. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. (1951). Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hawayek, A. & Cappelli, G. (2004). Identificación y recuperación del sujeto nulo: evidencia de una lengua signada (LSM). In Aguilar, I. Barreras, & Llaamas, M. Castro (eds.), Memorias del VII Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste (pp. 411–430). Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Hazen, K. (2007). The study of variation in historical perspective. In Bayley, R. & Lucas, C. (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Theories, Methods, and Applications (pp. 70–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, I. (1997). Tense in compositional semantics: introduction. Hand-out for the MIT seminar on Tense, Aspect and Events.
Heine, B., Claudi, U. & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991a). From Cognition to Grammar: Evidence from African Languages, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U. & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991b). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hendriks, B. (2004). An Introduction to the Grammar of Jordanian Sign Language. Salt, Jordan: Al-Balqa University.Google Scholar
Hendzel, J. K. (1986). Słownik Polskiego Języka Miganego. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo “Pojezierze.” Google Scholar
Hepp, I. & Nager, F. (1926). Die Taubstummheit im Kanton Zürich. Zürich: [No publisher listed].Google Scholar
Herbst, J. M. (1987). South African Sign Language. In Cleve, J. (ed.), Gallaudet Encyclopedia of Deaf People and Deafness (pp. 106–108). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Higgins, D. D. (1923). How to Talk to the Deaf. St. Louis, MO: Catholic Church at 1118 N. Grand Blvd.Google Scholar
Hintermair, M. (2007). Psychosoziales Wohlbefinden hörgeschädigter Menschen. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Hirn, D. F. (1910). De dövstummas åtbördsspråk i Finland – Kuuromykkäin viittomakieli Suomessa, I. Helsingfors: Finlands Dövstumförbunds Förlag.Google Scholar
History of Deaf Education in America. (American School for the Deaf, n.d.).
Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10, 210–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1966). The problem of universals in language. In Greenberg, J. (ed.), Universals of Language (pp. 1–29). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. (1979). Rewalidacja niestyszących: Podstawy Postę powania pedagogicznego. Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, R. J. (1978). The development of demonstrative pronouns, locatives, and personal pronouns in the acquisition of ASL by deaf children of deaf parents. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Hohenberger, A. & Happ, D. (2001). The linguistic primacy of signs and mouth gestures over mouthings: Evidence from language production in German Sign Language (DGS). In Braem, P. Boyes & Sutton-Spence, R. (eds.), The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages (pp. 153–190). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Hoiting, N. & Slobin, D. I. (2001). Typological and modality constraints on borrowing: Examples from the Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Brentari, D. (ed.), Foreign Vocabulary in Sign Languages: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Word Formation (pp. 121–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hoiting, N. & Slobin, D. I. (2002). Transcription as a tool for understanding: The Berkeley Transcription System for sign language research (BTS). In Morgan, G. & Woll, B. (eds.), Directions in Sign Language Acquisition (pp. 55–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates. (Trends in Language Acquisition Research; vol. 2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdsworth, W. & Aldridge, W. (1766). Natural short-hand, wherein the nature of speech and the manner of pronunciation are briefly explained. London: Self-published.
Hollak, J. & Jagodziński, T. (1879). Słownik Mimiczny dla Głuchoniemych i Osób z Nimi Styczność Mających. Warsaw: Nasza Księgarnia.Google Scholar
Holm, A., Gudman, S., Rasmussen, J. W. & Vestberg Rasmussen, P. (1983). Døveundervisning i Danmark 1807–1982: Med et Tillæg om Voksne Døve. København: Døveforsorgens Historiske Selskab.Google Scholar
,Holy Land Institute for the Deaf. (2004). Holy Land Institute for the Deaf – Salt, Jordan [Brochure]. Salt, Jordan.Google Scholar
,Honduran Deaf Projects. (n.d). Logos International Ministry Association. Pamphlet.
Hong, S. (2006). Agreement verbs in Korean Sign Language (KSL). Paper presented at the Ninth conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 9), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Hong, S. (2008). Eine empirische Untersuchung zu Kongruenzverben in der Koreanischen Gebärdensprache. PhD dissertation, Universität Hamburg.
Hoopes, R. (1998). A preliminary examination of pinky extension: Suggestions regarding its occurrence, constraints, and function. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Pinky Extension and Eye Gaze: Language Use in Deaf Communities (pp. 3–17). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (ed.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge/ New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houston, A. (1991). A grammatical continuum for (ING). In Trudgill, P. & Chambers, J. K. (eds.), Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation (pp. 241–257). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hoyer, K. (2004). The sociolinguistic situation of Finland-Swedish deaf people and their language, Finland-Swedish Sign Language. In Herreweghe, M. & Vermeerbergen, M. (eds.), To the Lexicon and Beyond: Sociolinguistics in European Deaf Communities (pp. 3–23). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Hoyer, K. (2005). Vi kallade dem Borgåtecken: Det Finlandssvenska Teckenspråket i Går och i Dag. In Östman, J. (ed.), FinSSL: Finlandssvenskt Teckenspråk (pp. 21–77). Helsingfors, Finland: Institutionen för nordiska språk och nordisk litteratur, Helsingfors universitet.Google Scholar
Hoyer, K., Londen, M. & Östman, J. (2006). Teckenspråk: Sociala och Historiska Perspektiv. Nordica. Helsingfors, Finland: Institutionen för nordiska språk och nordisk litteratur, Helsingfors universitet.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (2003). The distribution of negative NPs and some typological correlates. In Li, Y. A. & Simpson, A. (eds.), Functional Structure(s), Form and Interpretation (pp. 262–280). New York/Milton Park, UK: Routledge (Taylor and Francis).Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1985). A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Iatridou, S., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Izvorski, R. (2001). Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (pp. 189–238). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Itô, J. & Mester, A. (1995a). Japanese Phonology. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.), Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 817–838). Oxford/New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Itô, J. & Mester, A. (1995b). The core-periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on reranking. In Beckman, J., Dickey, L. Walsh & Urbanczyk, S (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18: Papers in Optimality Theory (pp. 181–209). Amherst, MA: GLSA (Graduate Linguistic Students Association), University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1998). The Nature and Functions of Gesture in Children's Communication. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Iyute, D. & Nkwangu, R. (2007). Uganda's second international Deaf awareness week to be commemorated in September 2007. Uganda National Associaton of the Deaf Newsletter, July 18th Edition.
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2007). A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research, 1146, 2–22.CrossRef
Jackendoff, R. (2008). Your theory of language evolution depends on your theory of language. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago, IL.
Jackson, P. W. (2001). A Pictorial History of Deaf Britain. Winsford, UK: Deafprint.Google Scholar
Jacobucci, G. (1997). Strategie di normalizzazione. Il bambino sordo nella scuola dell'obbligo. In Zuccalà, A. (ed.) Cultura del gesto e cultura della parola. Viaggio antropologico nel mondo dei sordi (pp. 90–106). Meltemi: Milano.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, aphasie, and allgemeine lautgesetze. Repr. 1968 as Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1971 [1957]). Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Roman Jakobson: selected Writings. Vol. II: Word and Language (pp. 130–147). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1971). Quest for the essence of language. In Roman Jakobson: Selected Writings. Vol. II: Word and Language (pp. 345–359). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, G. & Halle, M. (1951). Preliminaries of Speech Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Repr. 1961.Google Scholar
Janis, W. (1995). A crosslinguistic perspective on ASL verb agreement. In Emmorey, K. & Reilly, J. (eds.), Language, Gesture, and Space (pp. 195–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Jansma, S., Knoors, H. & Baker, A. (1997). Sign language assessment: A Dutch project, in Deafness and education. Special Focus Edition: Sign Language in the Education of Deaf Children, 21(3), 39–46.Google Scholar
Jantunen, T. (2003). Viittomien historiallinen muutos ja deikonisaatio suomalaisessa viittomakielessä. [Historical Change and Deiconisation in Finnish Sign Language Signs; with English abstract] Puhe ja kieli, 23, 43–60.Google Scholar
Jantunen, T. (2005). Mistä on pienet tavut tehty? Analyysi suomalaisen viittomakielen tavusta prosodisen mallin viitekehyksessä. Licentiate thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Jantunen, T. (2006). The complexity of lexical movements in FinSL. In Suominen, M., Arppe, A., Airola, A., Heinamaki, O., Miestamo, M., Määttä, U., Niemi, J., Pitkänen, K. K. & Sinnemäki, K. (eds.), A Man of Measure: Festschrift in Honour of Fred Karlsson on His 60th Birthday (pp. 335–344). Turku: The Linguistic Association of Finland. (Special Supplement to SKY Journal of Linguistics; vol. 19, 2006)Google Scholar
Jantunen, T. (2007). Tavu suomalaisessa viittomakielessä. [The Syllable in Finnish Sign Language; with English abstract] Puhe ja kieli, 27, 109–126.Google Scholar
Janzen, T. (1999). The grammaticalization of topics in American Sign Language. Studies in Language, 23(2), 271–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, T. & Shaffer, B. (2002). Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticalization. In Meier, R., Cormier, K. & Quinto-Pozos, D. (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages (pp. 199–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Jewish Deaf Association. (2003). Sign Language in Judaism. London: Jewish Deaf Association.Google Scholar
Jia, L. & Bayley, R. (2002). Null pronoun variation in Mandarin Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 8(3), 103–116.Google Scholar
Jirou, G. (2000). Analyse descriptive du parler gestuel de Mbour (Sénégal). Mémoire de maîtrise de Sciences du Langage, Université Paris VIII.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E. (1990). Distinctive features for handshapes in American Sign Language. Paper presented at the Fourth Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 4), Boston, MA.
Johnson, R. E. (1991). Sign language, culture & community in a traditional Yucatec Maya village. Sign Language Studies, 20(73), 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. E. & Liddell, S. (1984). Structural diversity in the American Sign Language lexicon. In Testen, D., Mishra, V. & Drogo, J. (eds.), Papers from the Twentieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 20) (pp. 173–186). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. (1989). Auslan: The sign language of the Australian deaf community. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Sydney.
Johnston, T. (1998). Signs of Australia: A New Dictionary of Auslan. Sydney: North Rocks Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. (2001). Nouns and verbs in Australian Sign Language: An open and shut case? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. (2003). BSL, Auslan and NZSL: Three signed languages or one? In Baker, A., Bogaerde, B. & Crasborn, O. (eds.), Cross-Linguistic Perspectives in Sign Language Research: Selected Papers from Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR), 2000 (pp. 47–69). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. (2004). W(h)ither the deaf community? Population, genetics, and the future of Australian Sign Language. American Annals of the Deaf, 148(5), 358–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, T. & Schembri, A. (2006). Issues in the creation of a digital archive of a signed language. In Barwick, L. & Thieberger, N. (eds.), Sustainable Data from Digital Fieldwork: Proceedings of the Conference Held at the University of Sydney, Australia (pp. 7–16). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, T., & Schembri, A. (2007). Australian Sign Language: An Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, M. (1991). Gebärdensprach-Theater in den Niederlanden: Eine kurze Geschichte des Handtheaters. Das Zeichen, 5(16), 143–152.Google Scholar
Julliann Montañez, C. (2003). Génesis de la Comunidad Silente en México. La Escuela Nacional de Sordomudos (1867–1896). PhD dissertation for Licenciatura in History, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.
Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kafando, A. (1990). Les Mains qui parlent. Introduction à la Communication manuelle au Burkina-Faso.
Kamei, N. (2006). The birth of Langue des Signes Franco-Africaine: Creole ASL in West and Central French-speaking Africa. Online conference paper of Languages and Education in Africa Conference (LEA 2006). Oslo: University of Oslo. Available at www.pfi.uio.no/konferanse/LEA%202006/.
Kamp, H. & Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Kato, M. A. & Raposo, E. (1994). European and Brazilian Portuguese word order: questions, focus and topic constructions. In Parodi, C., Quicoli, A. C., Saltarelli, M. & Zubizarreta, L. (eds.), Aspects of Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV (pp. 267–278). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1996). Lectures of Grammatical Theory. Technical report, University of Girona, Girona Summer Institute in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1998). Overt vs. covert movement. Syntax, 1, 128–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keep, J. R. (1857). The mode of learning the sign language. In Convention of American Instructors of the Deaf, Proceedings (pp. 133–153). Bedford, TX: American Instructors of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Kegl, J. (1985). Causative marking and the construal of agency in American Sign Language. In Eilfort, W. H., Kroeber, P. D. & Peterson, K. L. (eds.), Proceedings from the Twenty-First Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 21) (pp. 120–137). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kegl, J. (2002). Language emergence in a language-ready brain: Acquisition. In Morgan, G. & Woll, B. (eds.), Directions in Sign Language Acquisition (pp. 207–254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegl, J. & Iwata, G. (1989). Lenguaje de Signos Nicaragüense: A pidgin sheds light on the “creole?” ASL. In Carlson, R., DeLancey, S., Gilden, S., Payne, D. & Saxena, A. (eds.), Fourth Annual Meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference (pp. 266–294). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kegl, J., Neidle, C., MacLaughlin, D., Hoza, J. & Bahan, B. (1996). The case for grammar, order and position in ASL: A reply to Bouchard and Dubuisson. Sign Language Studies, 90, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegl, J. A., Senghas, A. & Coppola, M. (1999). Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In DeGraff, M. (ed.), Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony & Development (pp. 179–237). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelman, C. & Branco, A. (2004). Deaf children in regular classrooms: A sociocultural approach to a Brazilian experience. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(3), 274–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2003). Pointing by Hand in “Neapolitan.” In Kita, S. (ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (pp. 243–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G., Arnold, R., Dugdale, P., Fahey, S. & Moskovitz, D. (1997). A Dictionary of New Zealand Sign Language. Auckland: Auckland University Press with Bridget William Books.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-S. (1997). Syntactic Focus Movement and Ellipsis: A Minimalist Approach. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Kimura, H. & Ichida, Y. (1995). Hazimete no Syuwa. Tokoyo: Nihonbungeisha.Google Scholar
Kirejczyk, K. 1967. Ewolucja systemów kształcenia dzieci głuchych. Warsaw: Nasza księgarnia.Google Scholar
Kisch, S. (2000). “Deaf discourse”: The social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community. Master's thesis, University of Tel Aviv.
Kisch, S. (2004). Negotiating (genetic) deafness in a Bedouin community. In Cleve, J. (ed.), Genetics, Disability and Deafness (pp. 148–173). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Kita, S. (2003). Pointing: A foundational building block of human communication. In Kita, S. (ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (pp. 1–9). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kita, S. & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiyaga, N. B. & Moores, D. F. (2003). Deafness in Sub-Saharan Africa. American Annals of the Deaf, 148(1), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klee, E. (1985). Euthanasie im NS-Staat: die “Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens.” Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. (1964). Negation in English. In Fodor, J. & Katz, J. (eds.), The Structure of Language (pp. 246–323). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. & Bellugi, U. (1979). The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Knoors, H. (1992). Exploratie van de gebarenruimte. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Delft: Eburon.
Knoors, H. (1994). Increasing morphological complexity as a strategy: The SLN of nonnative signing children. In Bogaerde, B., Knoors, H. & Verrips, M. (eds.), Language Acquisition with Non-Native Input (pp. 51–69). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. (Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development; 2)Google Scholar
Knoors, H. (1999). The education of deaf children in the Netherlands. In Brelje, H. W. (ed.), Global Perspectives on the Education of the Deaf (pp. 249–260). Hillsboro, OR: Butte.Google Scholar
Kobosko, J. (1999). Wybrać czy nie? – Rozmowa o języku migowym. In Kobosko, J. (ed.), Moje dziecko nie słyszy. Materiały dla rodziców dzieci z wadą słuchu, 5 (pp. 147–155). Warsaw: Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciół Osób Niesłyszących i Niedosłyszących “Człowiek -Człowiekowi.” Google Scholar
Kobosko, J., Szuchnik, J. & Wojda, P. (2004). Kwestionariusz “JA-INNI” jako narzędzie służące do opisu tożsamości własnej młodzieży głuchej. Audiofonologia, 26, 119–133.Google Scholar
Korbus, C. (2006). On the situation of the Deaf, of sign language interpreters and of interpreters' education in Uganda. Diploma thesis, Zwickau, University of Applied Sciences.
Kourbetis, V. (1999). Elliniki Noimatiki Glossa: Mithi ke Pragmatikotita. In Kourbetis, V. (ed.), Noima stin Ekpedefsi. I Elliniki Noimatiki Glossa ke I didaskalia tis sta scholia Kofon (pp. 53–92). Athens: Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs, Pedagogical Institute.Google Scholar
Kourbetis, V. (2005). Education of the deaf in Greece: from oralism to bilingualism and special education in Greece: State of the art and curriculum development. Unpublished manuscript presented at Zunich University, Switzerland, November 2005.
Kourbetis, V. & Kostas, G. (2006). Deaf empowerment in Greece. In Goodstein, H. (ed.), The Deaf Way II Reader: Perspectives from the Second International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 42–47). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Krakowiak, K. (1995). Fonogesty jako narzędzie formowania języka dzieci z uszkodzonym słuchem. Lublin: Wyd. UMCS.Google Scholar
Krakowiak, K. (1998). W Sprawie Kształcenia Języka Dzieci i Młodzieży z Uszkodzonym Słuchem. Lublin: Wyd. UMCS.Google Scholar
Krakowiak, K. (2003). Kim Jest Moje Niesłyszące Dziecko? Rozważania o Ukrytych Założeniach Antropologicznych Współczesnych Koncepcji Surdopedagogiki i Audiofonologii. Lublin: GAUDIUM.Google Scholar
Krakowiak, K. (2004). Nowe podstawy wychowania językowego dzieci z głębokimi prelingwalnymi uszkodzeniami słuchu. Audiofonologia, 25, 1–9.Google Scholar
Krakowiak, K. (2006). Pedagogiczna typologia uszkodzeń słuchu. In Krakowiak, K. & Dziurda-Multan, A. (eds.), Nie Głos, Ale Słowo: Przekraczanie Barier w Wychowaniu Osób z Uszkodzeniami Słuchu (pp. 255–288). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Krakowiak, K., Muzyka, E. & Wojda, P. (2002). Oczekiwania rozmówców niesłyszących i słyszących wobec siebie jako przesłanki do programów pracy logopedycznej. Logopedia, 30, 67–85.Google Scholar
Kruth, L. (1996). En Tyst Värld – Full av Liv. Örebro: SIH Läromedel.Google Scholar
Kuwaiti Sign Language Dictionary. (1995). Available at www.mym.4mg.com/.
Kweller, D. (2005). Políticas educativas: La educación del niño sordo. Algunas reflexiones. La Revista Iberoamericana de Educación. Available at www.rieoei.org/opinion04.htm.
Kyle, J. & Allsop, L. (1982). Deaf People and the Community. Bristol, UK: Centre for Deaf Studies, School for Education, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Kyle, J. & Woll, B. (1985). Sign Language: The Study of Deaf People and Their Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kyle, J. & Woll, B. (1993). Language in Sign: The Development of Deaf Children's Communication in Sign Language. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation for sound change. Word, 19, 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45, 715–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of language change. Language Variation and Change, 2, 205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C. & Lewis, J. (1968). A Study of the Non-Standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City. Philadelphia, PA: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Ladd, P. (2003). Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. Clevedon, UK/Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1975). A Course in Phonetics. New York: Hartcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ladis, A. (1992). Review: Moshe Barasch, “Giotto and the Language of Gesture,” (Cambridge Studies in the History of Art). The Art Bulletin, 74(71), 159–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1965). On the Nature of Syntactic Irregularity. In Mathematical Linguistic and Automatic Translation, NSF-16 (National Science Foundation, Technical Report 16). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Computation Laboratory.Google Scholar
Lambropoulou, V. (1994a). The history of deaf education in Greece. In Erting, C., Johnson, R., Smith, D. & Snider, B. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 239–249). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Lambropoulou, V. (1994b). The vocational distribution of deaf people in Greece. In Erting, C., Johnson, R., Smith, D. & Snider, B. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 791–793). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Lambropoulou, V. (1999). The education of the deaf in Greece. In Brelje, H. W. (ed.), Global Perspectives on the Education of the Deaf (pp. 157–174). Hillsboro, OR: Butte.Google Scholar
Lane, H. (1984). When the Mind Hears. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lane, H., Boyes Braem, P. & Bellugi, U. (1976). Preliminaries to distinctive feature analysis of handshapes in American Sign Language. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 263–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R. & Bahan, B. (1996). A Journey into the Deaf World. San Diego, CA: Dawn Sign Press.Google Scholar
Lanesman, S. & Meir, I. (2007). The sign language of Algerian immigrants in Israel. Paper presented at the workshop entitled, Cross-linguistic Research and International Cooperation in Sign Language Linguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. (1995). Verbal morphology: Syntactic structures meet the minimalist program. In Campos, H. & Kempchinsky, P. (eds.), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Carlos Otero (pp. 251–275). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lazanas, V. (1984). The Problems of the Deaf. Athens: St. A. Tsepepas.Google Scholar
,League of Arab States. (2006). Member States. Available at www.arableagueonline.org/las/arabic/categoryList.jsp?level_id=61.
Lee, D. M. (1982). Are there really signs of diglossia? Re-examining the situation. Sign Language Studies, 35, 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, R. (2004). A Beginner's Introduction to Deaf History. Feltham, UK: British Deaf History Society.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1988). On the function of agreement. In Barlow, M. & Ferguson, C. (eds.), Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions (pp. 55–65). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI) Publications.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (1998). Ebonics in American Sign Language: Stylistic variation in African American signers. In Carroll, C. (ed.), Deaf Studies V: Toward Unity and Diversity (pp. 229–240), Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, College for Continuing Education.Google Scholar
Lewis, J., Palmer, C. & Williams, L. (1995). Existence of and attitudes toward Black variations of sign language. In Byers, L., Chaiken, J. & Mueller, M. (eds.), Communication Forum 1995 (pp. 17–48). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Department of ASL, Linguistics, and Interpretation.Google Scholar
Liddell, S. (1977). An investigation into the syntactic structure of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Liddell, S. (1980). American Sign Language Syntax. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Liddell, S. (1984). Unrealized inceptive aspect in ASL: Feature insertion in syllablic frames. In Drogo, J., Mishra, V. & Testen, D. (eds.), Proceedings from the Twentieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 20) (pp. 257–270). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Liddell, S. (1986). Head thrust in ASL conditional sentences. Sign Language Studies, 52, 243–262.Google Scholar
Liddell, S. (1995). Real, surrogate, and token space: Grammatical consequences in ASL. In Emmorey, K. & Reilly, J. (eds.), Language, Gesture and Space (pp. 19–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Liddell, S. (1996). Spatial representation in discourse: Comparing spoken and signed language. Lingua, 98, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. (2000). Indicating verbs and pronouns: Pointing away from agreement. In Emmorey, K. & Lane, H. (eds.), The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 303–320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Liddell, S. (2003a). Sources of meaning in ASL classifier predicates. In Emmorey, K. (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Construction in Sign Languages (pp. 199–220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Liddell, S. (2003b). Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. & Johnson, R. E. (1986). American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization and phonological remnants. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4, 445–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. & Johnson, R. E. (1989). American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 64, 197–277.Google Scholar
Liddell, S. & Metzger, M. (1998). Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(6), 657–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. (1986). Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. (1991). Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the Null Argument Parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. (2002). Where are all the modality effects? In Meier, R., Cormier, K. & Quinto-Pozos, D. (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages (pp. 241–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. & Fischer, S. (1992). Overt and covert Wh-questions in ASL. Paper presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Salamanca, Spain.
Lillo-Martin, D. & Quadros, R. M. (2008). Focus constructions in American Sign Language and Língua de Sinais Brasileira. In Quer, J. (ed.), Signs of the Time: Selected Papers from TISLR 2004 (pp. 166–176). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Quadros, R. M. & Mathur, G. (1998). Acquisition of verb agreement in American Sign Language and Brazilian Sign Language: A cross-linguistic study. Paper presented at the Sixth Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 6), Washington, DC.
Lipka, L. (1994). Lexicalization and institutionalization. In Asher, R. E. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 2164–2167). Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.Google Scholar
List, G. (1993). Deaf history: A suppressed part of general history. In Cleve, J.. (ed.), Deaf History Unveiled. Interpretations from the New Scholarship (pp. 113–126). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, E. M. (2002). Uruguayan Deaf Education and its Effects on the Deaf Community (Fulbright Uruguay Annual). Available at www.sordos.com.uy/foros/la_educacion_del_sordo_uruguaya.htm.
,Los sordos no tienen acceso a la secundaria ni a la universidad. Voces en Silencio, 2006.
Lucas, C. (1995). Sociolinguistic variation in ASL: The case of DEAF. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities (pp. 3–25). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, C. (2007). Variation and modality. In Bayley, R. & Lucas, C. (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Theories, Methods, and Applications (pp. 145–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, C. & Bayley, R. (2005). Variation in ASL: The role of grammatical function. Sign Language Studies, 6, 38–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, C. & Valli, C. (1992). Language Contact in the American Deaf Community. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, C., Bayley, R. & Valli, C. (2001). Sociolinguistic Variation in American Sign Language: Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, Vol. VII. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, C., Bayley, R., Reed, R. & Wulf, A. (2001). Lexical variation in African American and white signing. American Speech, 76(4), 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, C., Goeke, A., Briesacher, R. & Bayley, R. (2007). Variation in ASL: 2 Hands or 1? Paper presented at the Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation 36, University of Pennsylvania.
Lule, D. (2001). Regional variation in USL. Baccalaureate thesis, University of Bristol.
Maddieson, I. (2005). Syllable structure. In Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. & Comrie, B. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures (pp. 54–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mallery, G. (1893). Picture Writing of the American Indians: Tenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.Google Scholar
Mally, G. (1993a). The long road to self-confidence of the deaf in Germany. In Fischer, R. & Lane, H. (eds.), Looking Back: A Reader on the History of Deaf Communities and Their Sign Languages (pp. 177–198). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Mally, G. (1993b). Redewendungen der Deutschen Gebärdensprache: Münchner Dialekt. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Malm, A. (1998). Suomalaisen viittomakielen perussanakirja 2003. Helsinki: Kuurojen Liitto ry. [Available at http://suvi.viittomat.net/.]Google Scholar
Mandel, M. (1977). Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Friedman, L. (ed.), On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 57–107). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, M. (1979). Natural constraints in sign language phonology: Data from anatomy. Sign Language Studies, 24, 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, M. (1981). Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Manteau, E. & Thivilliers-Goyard, B. (2002). A propos de la situation des enfants sourds dans les pays d'Afrique subharienne. La Lettre d'Orthophonistes du Monde.
Marantz, A. (1994). A late note on late insertion. In Kim, Y-S., Lee, K-J., Lee, B-C., Yang, H-K. & Yoon, J-Y. (eds.), Explorations in Generative Grammar. A Festschrift for Dong-Whee Yang (pp. 396–413). Seoul: Hankuk Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Maroney, E. (2004). Aspect in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Marotta, G. (1985). Modelli e misure ritmiche: La durata vocalica in italiano. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Marsaja, I. G. (2008). Desa Kolok: A Deaf Village and its Sign Language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (2000). A linguistic comparison of two notation systems for signed languages: Stokoe Notation and Sutton SignWriting. Unpublished manuscript, Western Washington University.
Massone, M. & Curiel, M. (2004). Sign order in Argentine Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 5, 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massone, M. & Famularo, R. (2000). Semiotic aspects of Argentine Sign Language: Analysis of a videotaped “Interview.” In Metzger, M. (ed.), Bilingualism and Identity in Deaf Communities, Vol. VI (pp. 204–216). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Massone, M. & Johnson, R. E. (1991). Kinship terms in Argentine Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 73, 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massone, M. & Menéndez, S. M. (1992). An interactional approach to the analysis of Argentine Sign Language. Cuadernos de Estudios Lingüísticos, 33, 75–82.Google Scholar
Mathur, G. (2000). Verb agreement as alignment in signed languages. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Mathur, G. & Rathmann, C. (2004). Cross-sign-linguistic variation in the frequency of verb agreement forms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of DGfS, Mainz, Germany.
Mathur, G. & Rathmann, C. (2006). Variability in verb agreement forms in four sign languages. In Goldstein, L., Best, C. & Whalen, D. (eds.), Laboratory Phonology VIII: Varieties of Phonological Competence (pp. 287–314). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mathur, G. & Rathmann, C. (2007). The argument structure of classifier predicates in American Sign Language. In Rose Deal, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of Semantics of Underrepresented Languages of Americas. Amherst, MA: GLSA (Graduate Linguistic Students Association).Google Scholar
Mathur, G. and Rathmann, C. (forthcoming). The features of verb agreement in signed languages. In Pfau, R., Steinbach, M. and Woll, B. (eds.), Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Sciences on Sign Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Matsuoka, K. (1997). Verb raising in American Sign Language. Lingua, 103, 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. A. (1996). The Irish Deaf Community Volume 1: Survey Report, History of Education, Language and Culture. Dublin: Linguistics Institute of Ireland.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. (1990). A cognitive approach to the typology of verbal aspect. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Mayberry, R. & Eichen, E. (1991). The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 486–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maye, C., Ringli, G. & Boyes Braem, P. (1987). The use of signs in Switzerland: Projects in the Zurich and Geneva Schools. In Kyle, J. (ed.), Sign and School: Using Signs in Deaf Children's Development (pp. 162–170). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, Where Are You? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
Mbulamwana, J. (2004a). Implement the enacted disability friendly legislations. Uganda National Association of the Deaf Newsletter, 12–13.
Mbulamwana, J. (2004b). Silent Theatre launched. Uganda National Association of the Deaf Newsletter, December 13th Edition.
Mbulamwana, J. (2004c). WBS introduce Sign Language. Uganda Association of the Deaf Newsletter, June 12th Edition.
Mbulamwana, J. (2005). Ndeezi castigates stigmatization of the Deaf. Uganda Association of the Deaf Newsletter, December 15th Edition.
McBurney, S. (2002). Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent? In Meier, R., Cormier, K. & Quinto-Pozos, D. (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages (pp. 329–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1993). Constraint interaction and satisfaction.Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts/Rutgers University.
McClave, E. Z. (2000). Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(7), 855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClave, E. Z. (2001). The relationship between spontaneous gestures of the hearing and American Sign Language. Gesture, 1(1), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, B. H. (1982). Aspects of the American Sign Language predicate System. PhD dissertation, University of Buffalo, New York.
McIntire, M. (1980). Locatives in ASL. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
McKee, R. (2007). Hand to mouth: Findings on the role of mouthing in New Zealand Sign Language. Paper presented at the Australian Sign Language Interpreters Association National Conference, Macquarie University, Sydney.
McKee, D. & Kennedy, G. (2000). Lexical comparisions of signs from American, Australian, British and New Zealand Sign Languages. In Emmorey, K., & Lane, H. (eds.), The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 49–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McKee, D., McKee, R. & Major, G. (2008). Variation in the NZSL number system. In R. M. de Quadros (ed.), Sign Languages: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. TISLR9 (pp. 296–313). Published online at: www.editora-arara-azul.com.br.
McKee, D., McKee, D., Smiler, K. & Pointon, K. (2008). Maori signs: The construction of indigenous Deaf identity in New Zealand Sign Language. In Quinto-Pozos, D. (ed.), Sign Languages in Contact (pp. 31–81). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2000). Language and Gesture. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, B. & Swart, S. M. (1997). Childhood hearing loss in sub-Saharan Africa: A review and recommendations. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 1997, 40, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, R. P. (1982). Icons, analogues and morphemes: The acquistion of verb agreement in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Meier, R. P. (1990). Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Fischer, S. & Siple, P. (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research. Vol.I: Linguistics (pp. 175–190). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meier, R. P. (2002). The acquisition of verb agreement: Pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages. In Morgan, G. & Woll, B. (eds.), Directions in Sign Language Acquisition (pp. 115–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, R. P. & Willerman, R. (1995). Prelinguistic gesture in deaf and hearing infants. In Emmorey, K. & Reilly, J. (eds.), Language, Gesture and Space (pp. 391–409). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1929). Le Développement des langues. In Chevalier, J., (ed.), Continu et discontinu (pp. 119ff.) Paris: Blood & Gay. Repr. in A. Meillet, (1951). Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, Vol. II. (pp. 53–69). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Meir, I. (1995). Explaining backwards verbs in Israeli Sign Language: Syntax–semantic interaction. In Bos, H. & Schermer, G. (eds.), Sign Language Research (pp. 105–120). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Meir, I. (1998a). Syntactic–semantic interaction in Israeli sign language verbs: The case of backwards verbs. Sign Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meir, I. (1998b). Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. PhD dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Meir, I. (1999). A perfect marker in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 2, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meir, I. (2002). A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20(2), 413–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meir, I. & Sandler, W. (2008). Language in Space: The Story of Israeli Sign Language. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meir, I., Padden, C., Aronoff, M. & Sandler, W. (2007). Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics, 43, 531–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meir, I., Sandler, W., Padden, C. & Aronoff, M. (in press). Emerging Sign Languages. In Marschark, M. & Spencer, P. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, Vol II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mesch, J. (1998). Teckenspråk i Taktil Form: Turtagning och Frågor i Dövblindas Samtal på Teckenspråk. Hamburg: Signum. (International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf; vol. 38)Google Scholar
Mesch, J. (2000). Tactile Swedish Sign Language: Turn taking in signed conversations of people who are Deaf and blind. In Metzger, M. (ed.), Bilingualism and Identity in Deaf Communities (pp. 187–203). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. (Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities; vol. 6)Google Scholar
Mesch, J. (2006). Påminner nationella teckenspråk om varandre? In Hoyer, K., Londen, M. & Östman, J. (eds.), Teckenspråk: Sociale och Historiska Perspektiv (pp. 71–95). Helsingfors, Finland: Institutionen för Nordiska Språk och Nordisk Litteratur, Helsingfors Universitet.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. (2000). Constraints on Null Nubjects in Bislama (Vanuatu): Social and Linguistic Factors. Canberra: Pacific Linguistic Publications.Google Scholar
Miestamo, M. & Auwera, J. (2006). Negation and perfective vs. imperfective aspect. Paper presented at the Chronos 7 Conference, Antwerp.
Milewski, T. (1993). Teoria, Typologia i Historia Języka. Kraków: UNIVERSITAS.Google Scholar
Miller, C. (1996). Phonologie de la langue des signes québecoise: Structure simultanée et axe temporel. PhD dissertation, Université de Québec a Montréal.
Miller, C. (2001). Some reflections on the need for a common sign notation. Sign Language and Linguistics, 4(1/2), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirus, G., Rathmann, C. & Meier, R. P. (2001). Proximalization and distalization of sign movement in adult learners. In Dively, V., Metzge, M., Taub, S. & Baer, A. M. (eds.), Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research (pp. 103–119). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. E., Young, T. A., Bachleda, B. & Karchmer, M. A. (2006). How many people use ASL in the United States? Why estimates need updating. Sign Language Studies, Spring 6(3), 306–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales-López, E. (2004). Educación bilingüe en lengua de signos y lengua(s) oral(es) en Barcelona y Madrid. Barcelona: Asociació de Pares de Nens Sords de Catalunya (APANSCE). Available at www.apansce.org.Google Scholar
Morales-López, E., Agliaga-Emeterio, D., Alonso-Rodriguez, J. A., Boldú-Menasanch, R. M., Garrusta-Ribes, J. & Gras-Ferrer, V. (2002). Deaf people in bilingual speaking communities: The case of Deaf people in Barcelona. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Turn-Taking, Fingerspelling, and Contact in Signed Languages (pp. 107–155). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. (Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities; Vol. 8)Google Scholar
Morford, J. P. (1993). Creating the language of thought: The development of displaced reference in child-generated language. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
Morford, J. P. (1996). Insights to language from the study of gesture: A review of research on the gestural communication of non-signing deaf people. Language and Communication, 16(2), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G., Barriere, I. & Woll, B. (2006). The influence of typology and modality on the acquisition of verb agreement morphology in British Sign Language. First Language, 26, 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. W. (2006). Interrogatives and negatives in Japanese Sign Language. In Zeshan, U. (ed.), Interrogatives and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 91–127). Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Mubangizi, M. (2006). Five of eight siblings are deaf. The Weekly Observer, December, 14–20.
Mubangizi, M. (2007). PWD write to Museveni over neglect. The Weekly Observer, July, 5–11.
Mufwene, S. (2008). Language Evolution: Contact, Competition and Change. London/NewYork: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S., Rickford, J. R., Bailey, G. & Baugh, J. (1998). African American English: History, Structure, and Use. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mugenyi, S. (2003). Deaf children still denied access to secondary school. The New Vision, January 27th Edition.
Muhs, J. (1994). Eduard Fürstenberg. Das Zeichen, 8(30), 422–423.Google Scholar
Mulrooney, K. (2002). Variation in ASL fingerspelling. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Turn-Taking, Fingerspelling, and Contact in Signed Languages (pp. 3–23). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Nadolske, M. & Rosenstock, R. (2007). Occurrence of mouthings in American Sign Language: A preliminary study. In Perniss, P., Pfau, R. & Steinbach, M. (eds.), Visible Variation: Cross-Linguistic Studies on Sign Language Structure (pp. 35–61). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nakagwa, F. (2006). Isanga appeals for the deaf. The New Vision, September 20th Edition.
Nakamura, K. (2006). Deaf in Japan. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nampala, M. (2007). Raising six deaf dumb children single-handed. The New Vision, April 27th Edition.
Naro, A. J. (1981). Morphological constraints on subject deletion. In Sankoff, D. & Cedergren, H. (eds.), Variation Omnibus (pp. 351–357). Edmonton, AB: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Ndeezi, A. (2004). The Disability Movement in Uganda: Progress and Challenges with Constitutional and Legal Provisions on Disability. Kampala: Oscar Industries Ltd.Google Scholar
Ndeezi, A. & Ssendagire, E. (1998). How UNAD was formed: A brief history. Uganda Association of the Deaf Newsletter, December, Special edition.
Neidle, C. (2002). ASL focus and question constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 2, 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidle, C. (2003). SignStream-Version 2.2 CD-ROM. American Sign Language Linguistics Research Project, Boston University. Also available at www.bu.edu/asllrp/SignStream/.
Neidle, C. (2004). NCSLGR Sign Stream Database Volume 1. American Sign Language Linguistic Research Project (Distributed on CD-ROM), Boston University.
Neidle, C. (2007). NCSLGR SignStream Databases Volumes 2–7. American Sign Language Linguistic Research Project (Distributed on CD-ROM), Boston University.
Neidle, C. & MacLaughlin, D. (1998). SignStream. A Tool for Linguistic Research on Signed Languages. Sign Language and Linguistics, 1, 111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidle, C., & MacLaughlin, D. (2002). The distribution of functional projections in ASL: Evidence from overt expressions of syntactic features. In Cinque, G. (ed.), Functional Structure in the DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (pp. 195–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neidle, C., Sclaroff, S. & Athitsos, V. (2001). SignStream. A tool for linguistic and computer vision research on visual-gestural language data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 33, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neidle, C., Kegl, J., MacLaughlin, D., Bahan, B. & Lee, R. G. (2000). The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & Sandler, W. (1999). Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech, 42(2/3), 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. L. & Supalla, T. (2000). Sign language research at the millennium. In Emmorey, K. & Lane, H. L. (eds.), The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 103–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Niederberger, N. A. (2004). Capacités langagières en langue des signes française et en français écrit chez l'enfant sourd bilingue: quelles relations? PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.
,Nippon Foundation (2007). Gallaudet students visit the Nippon Foundation. Tokyo: Nippon Foundation Google Scholar
Nkwangu, R. (2006). Uganda commemorates the International Deaf Awareness Week for the first time. Uganda National Association of the Deaf Newsletter, December 17th Edition.
Nunes, J. (2004). Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nunes, J. & Quadros, R. M., R. (2006). Focus duplication of wh-elements in Brazilian Sign Language. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 35, Charleston, SC.
Nunes, J. & Quadros, Ronice M. (2008). Phonetically realized traces in American Sign Language and Brazilian Sign Language. In Quer, J. (ed.), Signs of the Time: Selected Papers from TISLR 2004 (pp.177–190). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Nurowski, E. (1983). Surdopedagogika Polska: Zarys Historyczny. Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
Nyst, V. (1999). Variation in Handshape in USL. Unpublished manuscript, University of Leiden.
Nyst, V. (2007). A Descriptive Analysis of Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana). Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).Google Scholar
Nyst, V. & Baker, A. E. (2003). The phonology of name signs: A comparison between the sign languages of Uganda, Mali, Adamorobe and the Netherlands. In Baker, A., Bogaerde, B. & Crasborn, O. (eds.), Cross-Linguistic Perspective in Sign Language Research: Selected Papers from Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 2000) (pp. 71–80). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, S. (2005). Indigenous Sign Language and Culture: The Interpreting and Access Needs of Deaf People who are Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander in Far North Queensland. Kewarra Beach, Australia: Australian Sign Language Interpreters Association.Google Scholar
Östman, J. (ed.) (2005). FinSSL:Finlandssvenskt teckenspråk. Nordica. Vol. 4. Helsingfors, Finland: Institutionen för nordiska språk och nordisk litteratur, Helsingfors unversitet.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1990). Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. In Ziolkowski, M., Noske, M. & Deaton, K. (eds.), Proceedings for the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 26. Vol. II: The Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology (pp. 319–338). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. & Kawasaki, H. (1984). Phonetics and prosodic phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 1, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, I. (1997). Kindai moorookyooiku no seirittu to hatten: Hurukawa Toisiroo no syoogai kara. [The Rise and Development of Modern Blind/Deaf Education: From the Life of Toshiro Furukawa.] Tokyo: NHK (Nihon Hoosoo Kyookai).Google Scholar
Okombo, D. O. (1991). The place of sign language in the African language situation. Unpublished manuscript, Nairobi University.
Oliveri, F. (2000). La Gestualità dei Siciliani. Palermo: Krea.Google Scholar
Oluoch, B. P. (2006). 1,000 March for USL Policy. Uganda National Association of the Deaf Newsletter, December 17th Edition.
Oteng, F. S. Ordbog over Dansk Tegnsprog (2008). Professions-højskolen VCC (http://www.tegnsprog.dk).
Oteng, F. S. (1997). Deaf Adwoa Benewaa. Kumasi: Kumasi Catholic Press.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., Zentella, A. C. & Livert, D. (2007). Language and dialect contact in Spanish in New York: Towards the formation of a speech community. Language, 83, 770–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oviedo, A. (1996). Bilingual deaf education in Venezuela: Linguistic comments on the current situation. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Multicultural Apects of Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, (Vol. II pp. 61–79). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Padden, C. (1980). The deaf community and the culture of deaf people. In Baker, C. & Battison, R. (eds.), Sign Language and Deaf Community: Essays in Honor of William C. Stokoe (pp. 89–104). Silver Spring, MD: National Association for the Deaf.Google Scholar
Padden, C. (1983). Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Padden, C. (1988). Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Padden, C. (1990). The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Isssues (pp. 118–132). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Padden, C. & Gunsauls, D. C. (2003). How the alphabet came to be used in sign language. Sign Language Studies, 4, 10–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padden, C. & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Padden, C. & Humphries, T. (2005). Inside Deaf Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Padden, C. & Rayman, J. (2004). The future of American Sign Language. In Cleve, J. & Armstrong, D. (eds.), The Study of Signed Languages: Essays in Honor of William C. Stokoe (pp. 247–263). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
,Palestine Red Crescent Society (2000). Qamus lughat al-ishara al-Falasteeniyah. Ramallah, Palestine: Matba'et Al Manar.Google Scholar
Paliza Farfan, A. (1994). The problem of the Peruvian deaf person. In Erting, C. J., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Snider, B. D. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 804–810). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L. L. (2003). Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parasnis, I. (1998). Culture and Language Diversity and the Deaf Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, S. & Parkhurst, D. (2001). Un estudio lingüístico: Variación de las lenguas de signos usadas en España. Madrid: RELLS.Google Scholar
Parrill, F. (2001). Linguistic aspect and gestural cues to backstage cognition. Paper presented at the Seventh International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Santa Barbara, CA.
Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Patrick, P. L. & Metzger, M. (1996). Sociolinguistic factors in sign language research. In Arnold, J., Blake, R., Davidson, B., Schwenter, S. & Solomon, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory and Analysis, (pp. 229–242). Stanford, CA: Center for the study of Language and Information (CSLI) Publications.Google Scholar
Pedersen, B. (2004). Thought from a Dane. Uganda National Association of the Deaf Newsletter, December 13th Edition.
Penn, C., Ogilvy-Foreman, D., Goldin, D. & Anderson-Forbes, M. (1992). Dictionary of Southern African Signs for Communicating with the Deaf. Johannesburg: Human Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Percy-Smith, L. (2006). Danske Børn med Cochlear Implant: Undersøgelse af Medvindsfaktorer for Børnenes Hørelse, Talesprog og Trivsel. Virum, Denmark: Videnscenter for døvblevne, døve og hørehæmmede.Google Scholar
Pérez, Y. (2008). Los Marcadores en conversaciones entre Sordos en Lengua de Señas Venezolana. PhD dissertation, Universidad de los Andes.
Perlin, J. (1993). Lingwistyczny Opis Polskiego Języka Migowego. Warsaw: WSiP.Google Scholar
Perlin, J. & Szczepankowski, B. (1992). Język Migowy dla Pedagogów. Opis Lingwistyczny. Warsaw: WSiP.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1990). On the segmental representation of transitional and bidirectional movements in ASL phonology. In Fischer, S. & Siple, P. (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR). Vol. I: Linguistics (pp. 67–80). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1992). Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 407–442.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1995). Phonological quantity and multiple association. In Goldsmith, J. A. (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 307–317). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Perniss, P. M. (2007). Space and Iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. (Max Planck Institute (MPI) Series in Psycholinguistics; 45)Google Scholar
Petitto, L. A. & Marentette, P. F. (1991). Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science, 251, 1493–1496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petronio, K. (1993). Clause structure in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
Petronio, K. & Lillo-Martin, D. (1997). Wh-Movement and the position of spec CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language, 73, 18–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, R. (2002). Applying morphosyntactic and phonological readjustment rules in natural language negation. In Meier, R. P., Cormier, K. A. & Quinto-Pozos, D. G. (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages (pp. 263–295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, R. & Glück, S. (1999). The pseudo-simultaneous nature of complex verb forms in German Sign Language. Paper presented at the Western Conference on Linguistics, El Paso, TX.
Pfau, R. & Quer, J. (2002). V-to-Neg raising and negative concord in three sign languages. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 27, 73–86.Google Scholar
Pfau, R. & Steinbach, M. (2005). Relative clauses in German Sign Language: Extraposition and reconstruction. In Bateman, L., & Ussery, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 35), Vol. II (pp. 507–521). Amherst, MA: GLSA (Graduate Linguistics Student Association).Google Scholar
Pfau, R. & Steinbach, M. (2006). Modality-Independent and Modality-Specific Aspects of Grammaticalization in Sign Languages. Linguistics in Potsdam, 24, 3–98. Available at www.ling.uni-potsdam.de/lip/.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Pierrehumbert, J. & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in discourse. In Cohen, P., Morgan, J. & Pollack, M. (eds.), Intentions in Communication (pp. 271–311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pietrzak, W. (1992). Język Migowy dla Pedagogów. Warsaw: WSiP.Google Scholar
Pigliacampo, R. (2001). Il genio negato: Giacomo Carbonieri psicolinguista sordomuto del XIX secolo. Siena: Cantagalli.Google Scholar
Pinsonneault, D. (1999). Lexique des Signes Utilisés par les Sourds au Mali. Mali: Editions Donniya.Google Scholar
Pitman, Isaac (1837). Stenographic Soundhand. London: Samuel Bagster.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. (1987/2004). Aspetti morfosintattici. In Volterra, V. (ed.), La Lingua Italiana dei Segni: La Communicazione Visivo, Gestuale dei Sordi. 2nd edn (pp. 179–209). Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. (2002). The development of Italian Sign Language (LIS) in deaf preschools. In Morgan, G. & Woll, B. (eds.), Directions in Sign Language Acquisition (pp. 77–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzuto, E. & Wilcox, S. (2001). A Study of Modal Verbs, Subjectivity, and Gesture in Italian Sign Language. Final Report, Italian National Research Council, Short Term Mobility Grant Programme, Rome.Google Scholar
Plann, S. (1997). A Silent Minority: Deaf Education in Spain, 1550–1835. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Plum, O. M., Søndergaard, L., Artmann, D., Kjær Sørensen, R., Hagedorn-Olsen, O. & Pedersen, A. (1979). Dansk-tegnordbog. København, Denmark: Danske Døves Landsforbund.Google Scholar
Poggi, I. (2007). Minds, Hands, Face and Body: A Goal and Brief View of Multimodal Communication. Buchverlag, Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar
Polich, L. (2000). The search for proto-NSL: Looking for the roots of the Nicaraguan Deaf community. In Metzger, M. (ed.), Bilingualism and Identity in Deaf Communities, Vol. VI (pp. 255–305). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Polich, L. (2005). The Emergence of the Deaf Community in Nicaragua: “With Sign Language You Can Learn So Much.” Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, UG, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
Prałat-Pyrzewicz, I. & Bajewska, J. (1994). Język Migowy w Szkole i Internacie. Warsaw: WSiP.Google Scholar
Prawitz, J. (1913). Manilla Dövstumskola 1812–1912. Stockholm: Beckman.Google Scholar
Prillwitz, S., Leven, R., Meyenn, A., Schmidt, W. & Zienert, H. (1985). Skizzen zueiner Grammatik der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. Hamburg: Forschungsstelle DGS.Google Scholar
Prillwitz, S., Leven, R., Zienert, H., Hanke, T. & Henning, J. (1989). Hamburg Notation System for Sign Language: An Introductory Guide. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (2000). Events and the semantics of opposition. In Tenny, C. (ed.), Events as Grammatical Objects (pp. 445–482). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI) Publications.Google Scholar
Pyers, J. E. & Emmorey, K. (2007). Two-Faced: How Knowledge of a Sign Language Affects facial gesture. Paper presented at the International Society for Gesture Studies, Evanston, IL.
Pyers, J. E. & Senghas, A. (2007). Reported action in Nicaraguan and American Sign Languages: Emerging versus established systems. In Perniss, P., Pfau, R., Steinbach, M. (eds.), Visible Variation: Comparative Studies on Sign Language Structure (pp. 279–302). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.Google Scholar
Quadros, R. M. (1995). As Categorias Vazias Pronominais: Uma Análise Alternativa com Base na Língua de Sinais Brasileira e Reflexos no Processo de Aquisição. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Pontifícia Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS).Google Scholar
Quadros, R. M. (1999). Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Quadros, R. M. (2003). Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. In Baker, A., Bogaerde, B. & Crasborn, O. (eds.), Cross-Linguistic Perspectives in Sign Language Research: Selected Papers from TISLR 2000 (pp. 141–162). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Quadros, R. M.de (2004). O ‘bi’ em Bilingüismo na Educação de Surdos. Unpublished manuscript, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.Google Scholar
Quadros, R. M. & Lillo-Martin, D. (2007). Gesture and the acquisition of verb agreement in sign languages. In Caunt-Nulton, H., Kulatilake, S. & Woo, I. (eds.), BUCLD 31: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Boston Conference on Language Development (pp. 520–531). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Quadros, R. M., Lillo-Martin, D. & Chen-Pichler, D. (2004). Clause structure in LSB and ASL. Paper presented at the Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft (DGfS), [German Linguistics Association], Mainz, Germany.
Quer, J. (2005). Context shift and indexical variables in sign language. In Georgala, E. & Howell, J. (eds.), Proceeding from Semantics and Linguistic Theory 15 (pp. 152–168). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Quer, J. & Frigola, S. (2006). Cross-linguistic research and particular grammars: A case study on auxiliary predicates in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Paper presented at the Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Sign Language Research, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.
Quigley, S. P. & Paul, P. V. (1984). Language and Deafness. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, INC.Google Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, D. (2002). Contact between Mexican Sign Language and American Sign Language in two Texas border areas. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Quinto-Pozos, D. (2007). Sign Languages in Contact. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, D. (2008). Sign language contact and interference: ASL & LSM. Language in Society, 37, 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, D. (2009). Code-switching between sign languages. In Bullock, B. & Toribio, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-Switching (pp. 221–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raanes, E. (2006). Å gripe inntrykk og uttrykk: interaksjon og meningsdanning i døvblindes samtaler. En studie av et utvalg dialoger på taktilt norsk tegnspråk. PhD dissertation, Sor-Trondelag University College, Norway.
Radutzky, E. (1992). Dizionario Bilingue Elementare della Lingua Italiana dei Segni. Roma: Edizioni Kappa.Google Scholar
Rainò, P. (2004). Henkilöviittomien synty ja kehitys suomalaisessa viittomakieliyhteisössä [The birth and development of personal name signs in the Finnish Sign Language society] . Deaf Studies in Finland 2. Helsinki: Kuurojen Liitto ry (CD).Google Scholar
Ramchand, G. (2008). Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, E. & Fletcher, T. (1998). Special education and education reform in Mexico: Providing quality education to a diverse student population. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 13, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, C. (1997). Deaf Children in Public Schools: Placement, Contexts, and Consequences. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, C. (2007). Survey of Lenguaje de Señas de México. Paper presented at the Center for Research on Educational Equity, Assessment, and Teaching Excellence, University of California, San Diego.
Ramsey, C. & Noriega, J. (2000). Niños milagrizados [Miracle-ized Children]: Language attitudes, deaf education and miracle cures in Mexico. In Metzger, M. (ed.), Bilingualism and Identity in Deaf Communities, Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, Vol. VI (pp. 117–141). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, C. & Ruiz Beddla, F. (2004). Where there is no school: The Mexican Sign Language network and Language Transmission across Generations. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 8), Barcelona.
Ramsey, C. & Ruiz Beddla, F. (2006). Seeking Sign Language in Two Contexts: With and Without a School. Poster presented at the Ninth International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 9), Florianópolis, Brazil.Google Scholar
Ramsey, C. & Ruiz Beddla, F. (in press). The Deaf People who Spell: The Surviving Students of the Mexican National School for the Deaf. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Rathmann, C. (2000). The optionality of agreement phrase: Evidence from signed languages. Master's thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
Rathmann, C. (2005). Event Structure in American Sign Language. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Rathmann, C. & Mathur, G. (2002). Is verb agreement different cross-modally? In Meier, R., Cormier, K. & Quinto-Pozos, D. (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages (pp. 370–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathmann, C. & Mathur, G. (2004). Verb agreement as a linguistic innovation in signed languages. Paper presented at the Eighth Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 8), Barcelona.
Rathmann, C. & Mathur, G. (2005). Unexpressed features of verb agreement in signed languages. In Booij, G., Guevara, E., Ralli, A., Sgroi, S. & Scalise, S. (eds.), Morphology and Linguistic Typology: Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) (pp. 235–250). Bologna: University of Bologna. Available at http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm/.Google Scholar
Rathmann, C. & Mathur, G. (2008). Verb agreement as a linguistic innovation in signed languages. In Quer, J. (ed.), Signs of the Time: Selected Papers from TISLR 2004 (pp. 193–218). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Rathmann, C., Mathur, G. & Meier, R. P. (2003). From gesture to verb agreement. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Society for Gesture Studies, Austin, TX.
Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 164–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rée, J. (1999). I See a Voice: Language, Deafness and the Senses: A Philosophical History. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
,Regional Bureau of Education for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2007a). Quality Education for All: A Human Rights Issue. Santiago: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).Google Scholar
,Regional Bureau of Education for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2007b). The State of Education in Latin America and the Caribbean Guaranteeing Quality Education for All. Santiago: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).Google Scholar
Reilly, J. & Anderson, D. (2002). FACES: The acquisition of non-manual morphology in ASL. In Morgan, G. & Woll, B. (eds.), Directions in Sign Language Acquisition (pp. 159–181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, R. (2000). School psychology and special education in Mexico: An introduction for practitioners. School Psychology International, 21(3), 252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riberio Hutzler, C. (1994). Are deaf children “allowed” signing? In Erting, C. J., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Snider, B. D. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 811–816). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Rissanen, T. (1998). The categories of nominals and verbals and their morphology in Finnish Sign Language. Licentiate thesis in General Linguistics, Department of Finnish and General Linguistics, University of Turku, Finland.
Romeo, O. (1991). Dizionario dei Segni. La Lingua dei Segni in 1400 Immagini. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, O. (2001). ISL as a topic prominent language. Master's thesis, University of Haifa.
Rosellini, T. L. (1998). Adama, the Fulani Magician [Documentary]. Santa Cruz, CA: African Family Films.Google Scholar
,Royal Commission. (1889). On the Education of the Blind, Deaf and Dumb. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO).Google Scholar
,Royal National Institute for the Deaf. (1981). Sign and Say. London: The Royal National Institute for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People (RNID).Google Scholar
Russo, T. (2005). A cross-cultural, cross-linguistic analysis of metaphors in two Italian Sign Language registers. Sign Language Studies, 5, 333–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, T., Giuranna, R. & Pizzuto, E. (2001). Italian Sign Language (LIS) poetry: Iconic properties and structural regularities. Sign Language Studies, 2(1), 84–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Salmi, E. & Laakso, M. (2005). Maahan Lämpimään: Suomen Viittomakielisten Historia. Helsinki: Kuurojen Liitto ry.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. (1986). The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 50, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W. (1989). Phonological Representation of the Sign: Linearity and Nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W. (1993). A sonority cycle in American Sign Language. Phonology, 10, 243–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W. (1996a). Phonological features and feature classes: The case of movements in sign language. Lingua, 98, 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W. (1996b). Representing handshapes. International Review of Sign Language Linguistics, 1, 115–158.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. (1999a). Prosody in two natural language modalities. Language and Speech, 42(2/3), 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W. (1999b). The medium and the message: Prosodic interpretation of linguistic content in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 2(2), 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W. (1999c). Cliticization and prosodic words in a sign language. In Hall, T. & Kleinhenz, U. (eds.), Studies on the Phonological Word (pp. 223–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W. & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C. & Aronoff, M. (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 2656–2665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santillán, M. (1994). The Ecuadorian Deaf community: History of the Deaf in Ecuador and the moment of awareness. In Erting, C. J., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Snider, B. D. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 119–122). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1925). Sound patterns in language. Language, 1, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapountzaki, G. (2005). Free functional elements of tense, aspect, modality and agreement as possible auxilaries in Greek Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Centre of Deaf Studies, University of Bristol.
Sasaki, D. (2003). Comparing the lexicon of sign languages in East Asia: A preliminary study focusing on the influence of Japanese Sign Language on Taiwan Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas, Austin.
Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot. [Course in General Linguistics. 10th printing. Peru, IL: Open Court Publishing, 2000]Google Scholar
Schalber, K. (2004). Phonological visibility of event structure in Austrian Sign Language: A comparison of ASL and ÖGS. Master's thesis, Purdue University., West Lafayette, IN.
Schalber, K. (2006). Event visibility in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS). Sign Language & Linguistics, 9(1/2), 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalber, K., & Grose, D. (2006). The semantics, syntax and phonology of event related nonmanuals in two sign languages. Paper presented at the Ninth Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 9), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Schein, J. D. (1968). The Deaf Community: Studies in the Social Psychology of Deafness. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schein, J. D. & Delk, M. T. J. (1974). The Deaf Population of the United States. Silver Spring, MD: The National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Schembri, A. (2002). The representation of motion events in signed language and gesture. In Schulmeister, R. & Reinitzer, H. (eds.), Progress in Sign Language Research: In Honor of Siegmund Prillwitz (pp. 99–125). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Schembri, A. (2003). Rethinking “classifiers” in signed languages. In Emmorey, K. (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 3–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schembri, A. & Johnston, T. (2006). Sociolinguistic variation in Australian Sign Language Project: Grammatical and lexical variation. Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 9), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Schembri, A. & Johnston, T. (2007). Sociolinguistic variation in the use of fingerspelling in Australian Sign Language (Auslan): A pilot study. Sign Language Studies, 7(3), 319–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schembri, A., Jones, C. & Burnham, D. (2005). Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gesture without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 272–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schembri, A., Johnston, T. & Goswell, D. (2006). NAME dropping: Location variation in Australian Sign Language. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Multilingualism and Sign Languages: From the Great Plains to Australia (pp. 121–156). Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, Vol. 12. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schembri, A., Cormier, K., Deuchar, M., Elton, F., Sutton-Spence, R., Turner, G. & Woll, B. (2007). The British Sign Language Corpus Project. Paper presented at the UK Council on Deafness Annual Deafness Conference, London.
Schermer, G. M. (1985). Analysis of natural discourse of deaf adults in the Netherlands: Observations of Dutch Sign Language. In Stokoe, W. C. & Volterra, V. (eds.), SLR '83: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Sign Language Research. Rome, June 22–26, 1983 (pp. 269–273). Rome/Silver Spring, MD: CNR (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche)/Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Schermer, G. M. (1990). In search of a language: Influences from spoken Dutch on Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Schermer, G. M. (2003). From variant to standard: An overview of the standardization process of the lexicon of sign language of the Netherlands over two decades. Sign Language Studies, 3(4), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schermer, G. M. (2004). Lexical variations in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Herreweghe, M. & Vermeerbergen, M. (eds.), To the Lexicon and Beyond: Sociolinguistics in European Deaf Communities (pp. 91–110). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schermer, G. M. & Harder, R. (1985). Lexical variation in Dutch Sign Language: some implications for language planning. In Tervoort, B. T. (ed.), Signs of Life: Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Sign Language Research, (pp. 134–141). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Schermer, G. M. & Koolhof, C. (1990). The reality of time-lines: Aspects of tense in SLN. In Prillwitz, S. & Vollhaber, T. (eds.), Current Trends in European Sign Language Research: Proceedings of the Third European Congress on Sign Language Research. (pp. 295–305). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Schermer, G. M., Brien, D. & Brennan, M. (2001). Developing linguistic specifications for a sign language database: The development of Signbase. Sign Language and Linguistics, 4(1/2), 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schermer, G. M. Harder, R. & Bos, H. (1988). Handen uit de Mouwen: Gebaren uit de Nederlandse Gebarentaal in kaart gebracht. Amsterdam: NSDSK/Dovenraad.Google Scholar
Schermer, T. (2001). The role of mouthings in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Some implications for the production of sign language dictionaries. In Boyes Braem, P. & Sutton-Spence, R. (eds.), The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Language (pp. 273–284). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Schermer, T., Geuze, J., Koolhof, C., Meijer, E. & Muller, S. (2006). Standaard Lexicon Nederlandse Gebarentaal, Deel 1 en 2 (DVD-ROM). Bunnik: Nederlands Gebarencentrum.Google Scholar
Schmaling, C. (2000). Maganar Hannu: Language of the Hands: A Descriptive Analysis of Hausa Sign Language. Hamburg: Signum. (International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf; vol. 35)Google Scholar
Schmaling, C. (2001). ASL in northern Nigeria: Will Hausa Sign Language survive? In Dively, V., Baer, A., Metzger, M. & Taub, S. (eds.), Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research (pp. 180–193). Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. A. (1980). Co-occurrence restrictions in negative, interrogative, and conditional clauses: A cross-linguistic study. PhD dissertation, SUNY Buffalo, New York.
Schröder, O.-I. (1993). Introduction to the history of Norwegian Sign Language. In Fischer, R. & Lane, H. (eds.), Looking Back: A Reader on the History of Deaf Communities and Their Sign Languages (pp. 231–248). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Scobbie, J. (1997). Autosegmental Representation in a Declarative Constraint-Based Framework. New York/London: Garland Press [Original dissertation title: Attribute value phonology. Edinburgh].Google Scholar
Scott, D., Carmi, R., Eldebour, K., Duyk, G., Stone, E. & Sheffield, V. (1995). Nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness is linked to the DFNB1 locus in a large inbred Bedouin family from Israel. American Journal of Human Genetics, 57, 965–968.Google Scholar
Sebba, M. (1997). Contact Languages. New York: St. Mark's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seely, D. R., Gloyd, S. S., Wright, A. D. & Norton, J. (1995). Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among Sierra Leonean children. Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 121, 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidl, A. (2001). Minimal Indirect Reference: A Theory of the Syntax–Phonology Interface. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seidl, A. (2007). Infants' use and weighting of prosodic cues in clause segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1982). The syllable. In Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representation, Vol. II (pp. 337–383). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1995). Sentence prosody: Intonation stress and phrasing. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 550–569). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (2005). Comments on intonational phrasing in English. In Frota, S., Vigario, M. & Freitas, J. (eds.), Prosodies: Selected Papers from the Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia Conference, 2003 (pp. 11–58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Senghas, A. (2003). Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognitive Development, 18(4), 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senghas, A., Kita, S. & Özyürek, A. (2004). Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging Sign Language in Nicaragua. Science, 305(5691), 1779–1782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senghas, A., Roman, D. & Mavillapalli, S. (eds.), Simply Unique: What the Nicaraguan Deaf Community Can Teach the World. London/Managua: Leonard Cheshire International.
Senghas, A., Coppola, M., Newport, E. & Supalla, T. (1997). Argument structure in Nicaraguan Sign Language: The emergence of grammatical devices. In Hughes, E., Hughes, M. & Greenhill, A. (eds.), BUCLD 21: Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 550–561). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Senghas, R. J. (2003). New ways to be deaf in Nicaragua: Changes in language, personhood, and community. In Monaghan, L., Nakamura, K., Schmaling, C. & Turner, G. H. (eds.), Many Ways to Be Deaf: International, Linguistic, and Sociocultural Variation (pp. 260–282). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Serpell, R. & Mbewe, M. (1990). Dialectal flexibility in sign language in Africa. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Sign Language Research Theoretical Issues. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, B. (2000). A syntactic, pragmatic analysis of the expression of necessity and possibility in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Shahin, H., Walsh, T., Sobe, T., Lynch, E., King, M., Avraham, K. & Kanaan, M. (2002). Genetics of congenital deafness in the Palestinian population: Multiple connexin 26 alleles with shared origins in the Middle East. Human Genetics, 110, 284–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Shepard-Kegl, J. (1985). Locative relations in American Sign Language word formation syntax and discourse. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Shepard-Kegl, J. (2006). Deaf teachers have a critical role in effective teaching of deaf children. In Senghas, A., Roman, D. & Mavillapalli, S. (eds.), Simply Unique: What the Nicaraguan Deaf Community Can Teach the World (pp. 45–52). London, Managua: Leonard Cheshire International.Google Scholar
Shuman, M. K. (1980). Culture and deafness in Mayan Indian Society: An examination of illness roles. Medical Anthropology Newsletter, 2(5), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuy, R. W., Wolfram, W. & Riley, W. (1968). A Study of Social Dialects in Detroit. Washington, DC: Educational Resources Information Center.Google Scholar
Siple, P. (1978). Visual constraints for sign language communication. Sign Language Studies, 19, 97–112.Google Scholar
Skarżyński, H. (2004). Nowa era w otochirurgii. Audiofonologia, 25, 11–17.Google Scholar
Skliar, C., & Quadros, R. M. (2004). Bilingual deaf education in the south of Brazil. Bilingual Education and Biligualism, 7(5), 368–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skolöverstyrelsen, . (1983). Läroplan för Specialskolan. Kompletterande Föreskrifter till LGr80. Stockholm: Liber Utbildningsförlaget.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2006). Issues of linguistic typology in the study of sign language development of deaf children. In Schick, B., Marschark, M. & Spencer, P. E. (eds.), Advances in the Sign Language Development of Deaf Children (pp. 20–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. In Gahl, S., Dolbey, A. & Johnson, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20 (pp. 487–505). Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Hoiting, N., Anthony, M., Biederman, Y., Kuntze, K., Lindert, R., Pyers, J., Thumann, H. & Weinberg, A. (2001). Sign language transcription at the level of meaning components: Berkeley Transcription System (BTS). Sign Language and Linguistics, 4, 63–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Hoiting, N., Kuntze, M., Lindert, R., Weinberg, A., Pyers, J., Anthony, M., Biederman, Y., & Thumann, H. (2003). A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers.” In Emmorey, K. (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 271–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smith, C. R. (2007). “Almost” in ASL: Insights into event structure. Master's thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Smith, E. (2003). “Deaf Ways”: The literacy teaching strategies of deaf teachers in New Zealand. Master's thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
Smith, W. (1989). The morphological characteristics of verbs in Taiwan Sign Language. Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Smith, W.(1990). Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language. In Fischer, S. & Siple, P. (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR). Vol.I: Linguistics (pp. 211–228). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W. (2005). Taiwan Sign Language: An historical overview. Language and Linguistics, 6, 187–215.Google Scholar
Sohn, H.-M. (1999). The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sorin-Barreteau, L. (1996). Le Langage Gestuel des Mofu-Gudur au Cameroun. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Paris V-René Descartes.
Souza Campello, A. R. S. (1994). The origin of the Deaf community in Brazil. In Erting, C. J., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Snider, B. D. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 117–118). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
,Statistics New Zealand. (2001). New Zealand Disability Survey Snapshot 6: Sensory Disabilities. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
Steele, S. (1978). Word order variation: A typological study. In Greenberg, J., Ferguson, C. & Moravcsik, E. (eds.), Universals of Human Language. Vol. IV: Syntax (pp. 585–623). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinbach, M. & Pfau, R. (2007). Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign language. In Perniss, P., Pfau, R. & Steinbach, M. (eds.), Visible Variation: Cross-Linguistic Studies on Sign Language Structure (pp. 303–339). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1995). Underspecification and markedness. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.), Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 114–174). Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. C. (1969). Bagirmi Grammar. (Linguistic Monograph Series 3) Research Unit. University of Khartoum.Google Scholar
Stocker, K. (2002). Cochlea-Implantat, Gebärden und Frühschriftsprache. PhD dissertation, University of Zurich. Zurich: Edition Schweizerische Zentralstelle für Heilpädagogik (SZH).
Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo. (Occasional Papers 8)Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. (1969). Sign Language diglossia. Studies in Linguistics, 21, 27–41.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. (1991). Semantic Phonology. Sign Language Studies, 71, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, W., Casterline, D. & Croneberg, C. (1965). A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press. Repr. 1976.Google Scholar
Stone, C. & Woll, B. (2008). Dumb O Jemmy and others: Deaf people, interpreters and the London courts in the 18th and 19th centuries. Sign Language Studies, 8(3), 226–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroombergen, M. & Schermer, G. M. (1988). Notatiesysteem Voor Nederlandse gebaren. [Notationsystem for Dutch Signs]. Amsterdam: NSDSK.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Y. (2003). The Arabic Language and National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Supalla, S. (1991). Manually Coded English: The modality question in signed language development. In Siple, P. & Fischer, S. (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR). Vol. II: Psychology (pp. 85–110). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Supalla, S., Cripps, J. H. & McKee, C. (2008). Revealing Sound in the Signed Medium Through an Alphabetic System. Poster presented at the First SignTyp Conference, Storrs, CT, June 2008.Google Scholar
Supalla, T. (1982). Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Supalla, T. (1985). The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Craig, C. (ed.), Noun Classification and Categorization (pp. 181–214). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Associates.Google Scholar
Supalla, T. (1997). An implicational hierarchy in verb agreement in American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester, NY.
Supalla, T. (2003). Revisiting visual analogy in ASL classifier predicates. In Emmorey, K. (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 249–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Supalla, T. (2004). The validity of the Gallaudet lecture films. Sign Language Studies, 4, 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, T. & Newport, E. (1978). How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in ASL. In Siple, P. (ed.), Understanding Language Through Sign Language Research (pp. 91–132). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sutermeister, E. (1929). Quellenbuch zur Geschichte des Schweizerischen Taubstummenwesens. Bern: Self-Published.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R. & Boyes Braem, P. (2001). Introduction. In Braem, P. Boyes & Sutton-Spence, R. (eds.), The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth. The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages (pp. 1–7). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R. & Woll, B. (1993). The status and functional role of fingerspelling in BSL. In Marschark, M. & Clark, D. (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Deafness (pp. 185–207). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R. & Woll, B. (1999). The Linguistics of British Sign Language: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R., Woll, B. & Allsop, L. (1990). Variation and recent change in fingerspelling in British Sign Language. Language Variation and Change, 2, 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suwayd, A. (1992). Al-qamus al-ishari. Triploi, Libya: Dar Al-Madinah Al-Kadeemah Lil-kitab.Google Scholar
Svorou, S. (1994). The Grammar of Space. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Swedish Government survey on the status of Swedish Sign Language. (1955). Det döva barnets språk- och talutveckling. Stockholm: Swedish Government survey on the status of Swedish Sign Language, 20.Google Scholar
,Swedish Government survey on the status of Swedish Sign Language. (2006a). Teckenspråk och teckenspråkiga. Kunskaps- och forskningsöversikt. Stockholm: Swedish Government survey on the status of Swedish Sign Language, 29.Google Scholar
,Swedish Government survey on the status of Swedish Sign Language. (2006b). Teckenspråk och teckenspråkiga. Översyn av teckenspråkets ställning. Stockholm: Swedish Government survey on the status of Swedish Sign Language, 54.Google Scholar
Świdziński, M. (1998). Bardzo wstępne uwagi o opisie gramatycznym Polskiego Języka Migowego. Część I. Audiofonologia, 12, 69–83.Google Scholar
Świdziński, M. & Czajkowska-Kisil, M. (1998). Czy głuchoniemy jest naprawdę niemy? Kosmos, 47, 243–250.Google Scholar
Swisher, V., Christie, K. & Miller, S. (1989). The reception of signs in peripheral vision by deaf persons. Sign Language Studies, 63, 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szagun, G. (2003). Spracherwerb bei Kindern mit Cochlear-Implantat im Vergleich mit normal hörenden Kindern. DFGS forum (Deutscher Fachverband für Gehörlosen- und Schwerhörigenpädagogik), 11, 71–82.Google Scholar
Szczepankowski, B. (1973). Problemy Rehabilitacji Inwalidów Słuchu. Warsaw: PZG.Google Scholar
Szczepankowski, B. (1988). Podstawy Języka Migowego. Warsaw: WSiP.Google Scholar
Szczepankowski, B. (1996). Zarys historii stowarzyszeń głuchoniemych 1876–1946. Warsaw: PZG.Google Scholar
Szczepankowski, B. (1999). Niesłyszący – Głusi – Głuchoniemi. Wyrównywanie Szans. Warsaw: WSiP. Spółka Akcyjna.Google Scholar
Szczepankowski, B. (2001). O języku migowym, języku miganym i systemie językowo-migowym. In Kobosko, J. (ed.) Bliżej Zycia. Materiały dla Rodziców Dzieci i Młodzieży z Wadą Słuchu (pp. 231–237). Warsaw: Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciół Osób Niesłyszących i Niedosłyszących “Człowiek-Człowiekowi.” Google Scholar
Sze, F. (2008). Blinks and intonational phrases in Hong Kong Sign Language. In Quer, J. (ed.), Signs of the Time: Selected Papers from TISLR 2004 (pp. 83–107). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. (2007). Quantitative analysis. In Bayley, R. & Lucas, C. (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Theories, Methods, and Applications (pp. 190–214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tai, J. H.-Y. & Su, S-F. (2006). Taiwan shouyu de huying gangshi [Agreement in Taiwan Sign Language]. Language and Linguistics, Monograph Series Number W-5, 341–363.
Takkinen, R. (1995). The Finnish Sign Language as the second language of a hearing family. In Bos, H. & Schermer, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, Munich, Germany (pp. 231–240). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Takkinen, R. (2002). Käsimuotojen Salat: Viittomakielisten lasten käsimuotojen omaksuminen 2–7 vuoden iässä. Deaf Studies in Finland. Helsinki: Kuurojen Liitto ry.
Takkinen, R., Jokinen, M. & Sandholm, T. (2000). Comparing language and interaction skills of deaf children living in a native and non-native language environment. In XIII World Congress of the Deaf Proceedings (pp. 342–355). Brisbane: Australian Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1975. Semantics and syntax of motion. In Kimball, J. P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, (pp. 181–238). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, (pp. 480–519). Berkeley, CA: University of California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tamomo, S. (1994). Le Langage des Signes du Sourd Africain Francophone. Cotonou, Bénin: PEFISS (Programme d'éducation de formation et d'intégration social des sourds).Google Scholar
Tang, G. (2003). Verbs of motion and location in Hong Kong Sign Language: Conflation and lexicalization. In Emmorey, K. (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 143–166). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tang, G. (2006). Questions and Negations in Hong Kong Sign Language. In Zeshan, U. (ed.), Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 198–224). Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Tang, G. (2007). Dictionary of Hong Kong Sign Language. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Tang, G., Lam, S., Sze, F. & Lau, P. (2006). Acquisition of verb agreement in Hong Kong Sign Language. Paper presented at the Ninth Conference on Theoretical Issues on Sign Language Research (TISLR 9), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Tang, G. & Yang, G. (2007). Events of motion and causation in Hong Kong Sign Language. Lingua, 117, 1216–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taub, S. (2001). Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taub, S. & Galvan, D. (2001). Patterns of conceptual encoding in ASL motion descriptions. Sign Language Studies, 1, 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2006). Where do phonemes come from? A view from the bottom. International Journal of English Studies, 6(2), 19–54.Google Scholar
Tennant, R. & Gluszak-Brown, M. (1998). The American Sign Language Handshape Dictionary. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Terpstra, A. & Schermer, T. (2006). ‘Wat is NmG en waarom gebruik je het?’ Van Horen Zeggen February 2006, 1–10.
Tervoort, B. T. (1987). Dutch Sign Language. In Cleve, J. (ed.), Gallaudet Encyclopedia of Deaf People and Deafness, Vol. III (pp. 70–71). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thompson, R., Emmorey, K. & Gollan, T. H. (2005). “Tip of the fingers” experiences by deaf signers: Insights into the organization of a sign-based lexicon. Psychological Science, 16(11), 856–860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R., Emmorey, K. & Kluender, R. (2006). The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: An eye-tracking study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 24, 571–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrift, E. (2003). Object drop in the L1 acquisition of Dutch. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).
Tomaszewski, P. (2005). Rola wychowania dwujęzycznego w procesie depatologizacji głuchoty. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 10(2), 174–190.Google Scholar
Tomaszewski, P. & Rosik, P. (2002). Czy polski język migowy jest prawdziwym językiem? In Jastrzębowska, G. and Tarnowski, Z. (eds.), Człowiek wobec ograniczeń: Niepełnosprawność, komunikacja, terapia (pp. 133–164). Lublin: Wyd. Fundacja ORATOR.Google Scholar
Torigoe, T. (1994). Resumptive X structures in Japanese Sign Language. In Ahlgren, I. & Bergman, B. (eds.), Perspectives on Sign Language Structure (pp. 187–200). Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Torigoe, T. (2000). Grammaticalization of pointings and oral movements in a home sign. Paper presented at the Seventh Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, (TISLR 7), Amsterdam.
Tovar, L. A. (1998). Reflexiones acerca de la educación de los Sordos Colombianos para el Siglo XXI. Lenguaje, 26, 24–37.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (1991). Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Associates.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. & König, E. (1991). The semantics–pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, E. C. & König, E. (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I (pp. 189–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, L. (2000). Event structure in syntax. In Tenny, C. & Pustejovsky, J. (eds.), Events as Grammatical Objects (pp. 145–185). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI) Publications.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. (1939). Grundzüge der phonologie [Principles of Phonology]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht (trans. 1969, University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, H. (1999). On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 219–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, G. H. (1995). Contact signing and language shift. In Bos, H. & Schermer, G. M. (eds.), Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, Munich, Germany (pp. 211–230). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1874). Researches Into the Early History of Mankind. London: Murray Publishers.Google Scholar
Tywonek, M. (2006). Opanowywanie języka migowego przez niesłyszące dzieci rodziców niesłyszących i słyszących. In Krakowiak, K. & Dziurda-Multan, A. (eds.), Nie Głos, Ale Słowo: Przekraczanie Barier w Wychowaniu Osób z Uszkodzeniami Słuchu (pp. 187–196). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
,Uganda National Association of the Deaf (UNAD) (2004). Information Handbook. Kampala: UNAD.Google Scholar
,Ugandan Government. (1995). The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda. Kampala: Law Development Centre.Google Scholar
,Undervisningsministeriet (1982). Undervisningsvejledning for folkeskolen. Vol. II: Specialpædagogisk bistand til elever med hørevanskeligheder. København: Undervisningsministeriet.Google Scholar
,Undervisningsministeriet (1991). Undervisningsvejledning for folkeskolen. Vol. V: Tegnsprog. København: Undervisningsministeriet.Google Scholar
,Undervisningsministeriet (2007). Dansk tegnsprog i folkeskolen: god praksis for tilrettelæggelse og gennemførelse. København: Undervisningsministeriet.Google Scholar
,UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Spain: UNESCO.Google Scholar
,UNICEF. (1985). UNICEF Report on Prevention of Deafness: Hearing Aids. London: UNICEF.Google Scholar
Valli, C. (2005). The Gallaudet Dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Vallverdú, R. (2000). The sign language communities. In Turell, M. (ed.), Multilingualism in Spain: Sociolinguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects of Linguistic Minority Groups (pp. 183–214). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cleve, J. (1987). Gallaudet Encyclopedia of Deaf People and Deafness. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cleve, J. & Crouch, B. (1993). A Place of Their Own: Creating the Deaf Community in America. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Bogaerde, B. (2000). Input and Interaction in Deaf Families. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).
Bogaerde, B. & Baker, A. (1996). Verbs in the language production of one deaf and one hearing child of deaf parents. Paper presented at the the Fifth Conference on Theoretical Issues on Sign Language Research (TISLR 5), Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Bogaerde, B. & Baker, A. E. (2005). Code mixing in mother–child interaction in deaf families. Sign Language and Linguistics, 8(1/2), 155–178.Google Scholar
Bogaerde, B. & Mills, A. E. (1994a). Word order in language input to children: SLN or Dutch. In Brennan, M., Turner, G. H. & Graham, H. (eds.), Word-order Issues in Sign Language: Working Papers Presented at a Workshop Held in Durham, 18–22 September 1991. Durham: International Sign Language Association.Google Scholar
Bogaerde, B., Knoors, H. & Verrips, M. (1994b). Language Acquisition with Non-Native Input. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. (Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development; 2)Google Scholar
Hulst, H. (1993). Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology, 10(2), 209–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. (1995). The composition of handshapes. University of Trondheim, Working Papers in Linguistics, 1–18. Dragvoll, Norway.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. (2000). Modularity and modality in phonology. In Burton-Roberts, N., Carr, P. & Docherty, G. (eds.), Phonological Knowledge: Its Nature (pp. 207–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. (2009). Brackets and grid marks or theories of primary accent and rhythm. In Cairns, C. & Raimy, E. (eds.), Contemporary View on Architecture and Representations in Phonological Theory (pp 225–245). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. & Kooij, E. (2006). Phonetic implementation and phonetic pre-specification in sign language phonology. In Goldstein, L., Whalen, D., & Best, C. (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 8 (pp. 265–286). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kooij, E. (2002). Reducing Phonological Categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Phonetic Implementation and Iconic Motivation. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).Google Scholar
Kooij, E., Crasborn, O. & Emmerik, W. (2001). Weak drop in sign language of the Netherlands. In Dively, V. L., Metzger, M., Taub, S. & Baer, A. M. (eds.), Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research (pp. 27–44). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Kooij, E., Crasborn, O. & Emmerik, W. (2006). Explaining prosodic body leans in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Pragmatics required. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1598–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leer, B. (2006). The Italian Mobile Dipthongs: A Test Case for Experimental Phonetics and Phonological Theory. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Lingustics).Google Scholar
Gijn, I. (2004). The Quest for Syntactic Dependency: Sentential Complementation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Utrecht: LOT (The Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).Google Scholar
Gijn, I. & Baker, A. (2003). Testing for syntactic dependency: Some results from NGT. In Baker, A., Bogaerde, B. & Crasborn, O. (eds.), Cross-Linguistic Perspectives in Sign Language Research: Selected Papers from Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 2000) (pp. 193–208). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Gils, G. (2007). Dove tolken: partner of concurrent? [Deaf interpreters: partner or competition?]. Master's thesis, Hogeschool Utrecht.
Herreweghe, M. & Vermeerbergen, M. (2006). Interrogatives and negatives in Flemish Sign Language. In Zeshan, U. (ed.), Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 225–256). Nijmegen: Ishara Press. (Sign Language Typology Series No. 1)Google Scholar
Lambalgen, M. & Hamm, F. (2005). The Proper Treatment of Events. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanguardia, . (2005). Matriculan a sordos en enseñanza regular. Available at www.vanguardia.co.cu/index.php?+pl=design/secciones/lectura/portada.tpl.html&newsid_obj_id=8954.
Vashishta, M., Woodward, J. C. & DeSantis, S. (1985). An Introduction to the Bangalore Variety of Indian Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute.Google Scholar
Velásquez Garciá, C. (1994). The birth of Ecuadorian Sign Language. In Erting, C. J., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Snider, B. D. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Coference on Deaf Culture (pp. 123–126). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L. & Crasborn, O. (2007). Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vianna Martins, R. (2006). Linguistic development and Deaf identity in rural Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. In Goodstein, H. (ed.), Deaf Way II Reader (pp. 336–339). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, H. (1999). Gebärdensprache und Lautsprache in der deutschen Taubstummenpädagogik im 19. Jahrhundert. Historische Darstellung der kombinierten Methode. Master's thesis, University of Hamburg.
Vogel, H. (2002a). Otto Friedrich Kruse (1801–1880): Gehörloser Lehrer und Publizist. Part One. Das Zeichen, 15(56), 198–207.Google Scholar
Vogel, H. (2002b). Otto Friedrich Kruse (1801–1880): Mahner gegen die Unterdrückung der Gebärdensprache. Part Two. Das Zeichen, 15(57), 370–376.Google Scholar
Vogt-Svendsen, M. (2001). A comparison of mouth gestures and mouthings in Norwegian Sign Language (NSL). In Boyes Braem, P. & Sutton-Spence, R. (eds.), The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Language (pp. 9–40). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Voice for the Deaf. (n.d.) School today. Available at www.voiceforthedeaf.org/voiceforthedeaf/Today.html.
Volterra, V. (1981). Gestures, signs, and words at two years: When does communication become language? Sign Language Studies, 33, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volterra, V. (1987). La lingua italiana dei segni: La comunicazione visivo-gestuale dei sordi. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Wallin, L. (1994). Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Wallin, L. (1996). Polysynthetic Signs in Swedish Sign Language, translated from Polysyntetiska Tecken i Svenska Teckenspråket (1994). PhD dissertation. University of Stockholm.
Wallin, L., Lule, D., Lutalo, S. & Busingye, B. (2006). The Uganda Sign Language Dictionary. Kampala: Sign Language Research Project, Kyambogo University.Google Scholar
Wallvik, B. (2006). Det finländska dövsamfundets historia: några nyckelpersoners liv och leverne. In Hoyer, K., Londen, M. & Östman, J. (eds.), Teckenspråk: Sociale och Historiska Perspektiv (pp. 145–164). Helsingfors, Finland: Institutionen för nordiska språk och nordisk litteratur, Helsingfors universitet.Google Scholar
Walsh, T., Rayan, A., Sa'ed, A., Shahin, H., Shepshelovich, J. et al. (2006). Genomic analysis of a heterogeneous Mendelian phenotype: Multiple novel alleles for inherited hearing loss in the Palestinian population. Human Genome, 2, 203–211.Google ScholarPubMed
Washabaugh, W. (1979). Hearing and deaf signers on Providence Island. Sign Language Studies, 24, 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. (1809). Instruction of the Deaf and Dumb. London: Darton and Harvey.Google Scholar
Widell, J. (1994). Historical phases of Deaf culture in Denmark. In Erting, C. J., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Snider, B. D. (eds.), The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 212–219). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (1990). Metaphors in American Sign Language and English. In Edmondson, W. H. & Karlsson, F. (eds.), SLR '87: International Symposium on Sign Language Research. Finland (pp. 163–170). Hamburg: Signum. (International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf; Vol. 10)Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (1993). Syllables and segments: Hold the movement and move the holds! In Coulter, G. R. (ed.), Current Issues in ASL Phonology (pp. 135–168). New York/San Francisco, CA/London: Academic Press. (Phonetics and Phonology, 3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (1994a). Eyeblinks & ASL phrase structure. Sign Language Studies, 84, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (1994b). Foregrounding structures in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 647–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (1997). A prosodic/pragmatic explanation for word order variation in ASL with typological implications. In Verspoor, M., Lee, K. D. & Sweetser, E., (eds.) Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Constructions of Meaning (pp. 89–104). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (2000). Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. In Emmorey, K. & Lane, H. (eds.), The Signs of Language Revisited: Festschrift for Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 213–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (2003). Representations of telicity in ASL. Chicago Linguistic Society, 39, 354–368.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (2005). A reanalysis of reduplication in American Sign Language. In Hurch, B. (ed.), Studies in Reduplication (pp. 593–620). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (2008). Complex predicates involving events, time and aspect: Is this why sign languages look so similar? In Quer, J. (ed.), Signs of the Time: Selected Papers from TISLR 2004 (pp. 219–250). Hamburg: Signum.
Wilbur, R. B. (2009). Productive reduplication in ASL, a fundamentally monosyllabic language. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Data and Theory: Papers in Phonology in Celebration of Charles W. Kisseberth. special issue of Language Sciences 31, 325–342.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilbur, R. B. & Allen, G. D. (1991). Perceptual evidence against internal syllable structure in American Sign Language syllables. Language and Speech, 34, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilbur, R. B. & Malaia, E. (2008). Event Visibility Hypothesis: Motion Capture Evidence for Overt Marking of Telicity in ASL. Chicago, IL: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. & Petersen, L. (1990). Why syllables? What the notion means for ASL research. In Fischer, S., & Siple, P. (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR), Vol. I: Linguistics (pp. 81–108). Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. & Petersen, L. (1997). Backwards signing in ASL syllable structure. Language and Speech, 40, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilbur, R. B. & Schick, B. (1987). The effects of linguistic stress on ASL signs. Language and Speech, 30(4), 301–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilbur, R. B., & Patschke, C. G. (1998). Body leans and the marking of contrast in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 275–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. & Patschke, C. G. (1999). Syntactic correlates of brow raise in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics, 2, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, P. (2000). Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, P. (2004). A cognitive key: Metonymic and metaphoric mappings in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, P. & Wilcox, S. (1995). The gestural expression of modality in American Sign Language. In Bybee, J. & Fleischman, S. (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse (pp. 135–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S. (1992). The Phonetics of Fingerspelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2002). The gesture-language interface: Evidence from signed languages. In Schulmeister, R. & Reinitzer, H. (eds.), Progress in Sign Language Research: In Honor of Siegmund Prillwitz (pp. 66–81). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2004a). Gesture and language: Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture, 4(1), 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2004b). Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed language. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2005). Routes from gesture to language. Revista da ABRALIN – Associação Brasileira de Lingüística, 4(1/2), 11–45.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2007). Routes from gesture to language. In Pizzuto, E., Pietrandrea, P. & Simone, R. (eds.), Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing Structures, Constructs and Methodologies (pp. 107–131). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S., Rossini, P. & Pizzuto, E. (2001). The interplay of subjectivity, gesture and prosody: POSSIBLE and IMPOSSIBLE in Italian Sign Language. Paper presented at the Seminar at the Institute of Psychology, National Research Council, Rome.
Wilcox, S., Shaffer, B., Jarque, M. J., Valenti, J. M. S. I., Pizzuto, E. & Rossini, P. (2000). The emergence of grammar from word and gesture: A cross-linguistic study of modal verbs in three signed languages. Paper presented at the Seventh Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 7), Amsterdam.
Winteler, G. (1995). Ich hätte gerne geheiratet: Aus dem Leben gehörloser Frauen im 20. Jahrhundert. Master's Thesis: Höhere Fachschule für Soziokulturelle Animation, Zurich.
Wojda, P. (1999). Język migowy – “spojrzenie od wewnątrz.” In Kobosko, J. K (ed.), Moje Dziecko Nie Słyszy: Materiały dla Rodziców Dzieci z Wadą Słuchu (pp. 166–171). Warsaw: Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciół Osób Niesłyszących i Niedosłyszących “Człowiek-Człowiekowi.” Google Scholar
Wojda, P. (2000). Rola języka migowego w rodzinie dziecka niesłyszącego. In Kornas-Biela, D. (ed.), Źródło Źycia i Szkoła Miłości (pp. 491–510). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.Google Scholar
Wojda, P. (2001). Czy można nauczyć się języka migowego? In Kobosko, J. (ed.), Bliżej Zycia: Materiały Dla Rodziców Dzieci i Młodzieży z Wadą Słuchu. Warsaw: Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciół Osób Niesłyszących i Niedosłyszących “Człowiek-Człowiekowi.” Google Scholar
Wojda, P. (2005). Nieprzyzwoite Migi' we Współczesnym Polskim Języku Migowym. Postgraduate thesis: Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna, Łódź.
Wojda, P. (2006). Język Migowy Jako Przejaw Kreatywności Językowej Osób Niesłyszących. In Krakowiak, K. & Dziurda-Multan, A. (eds.), Nie Głos, ale Słowo: Przekraczanie Barier w Wychowaniu Osób z Uszkodzeniami Słuchu (pp. 107–124). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Wolff, S. (2000a). Taubstumme zu glücklichen Erdnern bilden? Lehren, Lernen und Gebärdensprache am Berliner Taubstummeninstitut. Teil I: Selbstverständlich Gebärdensprache! Ernst Adolf Eschke in der Zeit von 1788 bis 1811. Das Zeichen, 14(51), 20–29.Google Scholar
Wolff, S. (2000b). Lehren, Lernen und Gebärdensprache am Berliner Taubstummen-Institut. Teil II: Die Willkür der Zeichen. Das Zeichen, 14(52), 198–207.Google Scholar
Wolff, S. (2000c). Erst bildbar? dann vorzeigbar: Karl Heinrich Wilke und seine Bilderwelt. Das Zeichen, 22(78), 8–17.Google Scholar
Wolff, S. (2008). Vom Taubstummenlehrer zum Gebärdensprachpädagogen: Die Rolle der Gebärdensprache: in einer 200-jährigen Professionsgeschichte. Das Zeichen, 22(78), 8–17.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1969). A Linguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Woll, B. (1981). Borrowing and change in BSL. Paper presented at the Linguistics Association of Great Britain Autumn Meeting, York.
Woll, B. (1983). The comparative study of different sign languages. In Kyle, J. (ed.), Sign and School (pp. 12–34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Woll, B. (1987). Historical and comparative aspects in BSL. In Kyle, J. (ed.), Sign and School (pp. 12–34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Woll, B. (1994). The influence of television on the deaf community in Britain. In Ahlgren, I., Bergman, B. & Brennan, M. (eds.), Perspectives on Sign Language Usage: Papers Presented from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research (SLR), Vol. I (pp. 293–301). Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Woll, B. (2001). The sign that dares to speak its name: Echo phonology in British Sign Language (BSL). In Braem, P. Boyes & Sutton-Spence, R. (eds.), The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages (pp. 87–98). Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Woll, B., Kyle, J. G. & Deuchar, M. (1981). Borrowing and change in BSL. Paper presented at the Linguistics Association of Great Britain Autumn Meeting, New York.
Woll, B., Kyle, J. G. & Deuchar, M. (1983). Historical change in British Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript, University college London.
Woll, B., Allsop, L., & Sutton-Spence, R. (1991). Variation and Recent Change in British Sign Language: Final Report to the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). Bristol, UK: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Woll, B., Sutton-Spence, R. & Elton, F. (2001). Multilingualism: The global approach to sign languages. In Lucas, C. (ed.), The Sociolinguistics of Sign Languages (pp. 8–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. K. (1999). Semantic and syntactic aspects of negation of ASL. Master's thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Woodward, J. (1972). Implications for sign language study among the deaf. Sign Language Studies, 1, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (1973). Implicational lects on the Deaf diglossic continuum. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
Woodward, J. (1976). Black southern signing. Language in Society, 5, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (1978). Historical bases of American Sign Language. In Siple, P. (ed.), Understanding Language Through Sign Language Research (pp. 333–348). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (1979). The selflessness of Providence Island Sign Language: Personal pronoun morphology. Sign Language Studies, 23, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (1985). Universal constraints on two-finger adjacency and choice. Sign Language Studies, 46, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (1987). Universal constraints across sign languages: One-finger contact handshapes. Sign Language Studies, 57, 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (1991). Sign language varieties in Costa Rica. Sign Language Studies, 73, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (1993). The relationship of sign language varieties in India, Pakistan, and Nepal. Sign Language Studies, 78, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (1996). Modern Standard Thai Sign Language: Influence from ASL, and its relationship to original Thai sign varieties. Sign Language Studies, 92, 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. C. (2000). Sign languages and sign language families in Thailand and Viet Nam. In Emmorey, K. & Lane, H. (eds.), The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 23–47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Woodward, J., Erting, C. & Oliver, S. (1976). Facing and handling variation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 10, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. & DeSantis, S. (1977). Two to one it happens: Dynamic phonology in two sign languages. Sign Language Studies, 17, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worseck, T. & Meyenn, A. (2007). Opportunities of Deaf Associations for the empowerment of Deaf and sign language communities in industrial countries. Paper presented at the Fifteenth World Congress of WFD (World Federation of the Deaf), Madrid.
Wrigley, O. (1997). The Politics of Deafness. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, J. (2004). The linguistic status of finger wiggling in Chinese Sign Language interrogatives. Paper presented at the Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 8, Barcelona, Spain.
Yang, J. & Fischer, S. (2002). Expressing negation in Chinese Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 5, 167–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zatini, F. (1993). Di tutto e di tutti circa il mondo della sordità (Enciclopedia). Firenze: Offset System.Google Scholar
Zaurov, M. (2003). Gehörlose Juden: eine doppelte kulturelle Minderheit. Frankfurt/Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Zeshan, U. (2000). Sign Language in Indo-Pakistan: A Description of a Signed Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U. (2004a). Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology, 8, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U. (2004b). Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Language, 80(1), 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U. (2006a). Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U. (2006b). Negative and interrogative constructions in sign languages: A case study in sign language typology. In Zeshan, U. (ed.), Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 28–68). Nijmegen: Ishara Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. (2001). Changing economy, changing markets: A sociolinguistic study of Chinese yuppies. PhD dissertation. Stanford University, CA.
Zhongguo shouyu (2003). Beijing: Huaxia.
Zimmer, J. & Patschke, C. G. (1990). A class of determiners in ASL. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues (pp. 201–222). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Zuccalà, A. (1997). Cultura del Gesto e Cultura Della Parola. Viaggio Antropologico nel Mondo dei Sordi. Milano: Meltemi.Google Scholar
Zucchi, A. (2009). Along the time line: Tense and time adverbs in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics, 17, 99–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, I. (2003). Classifying Hand Configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal [Sign Language of the Netherlands]. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, I. & Nijhof, S. (1999). Pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Don, J. & Sanders, T. (eds.), Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS Yearbook 1998–1999 (pp. 58–78). Utrecht: UiL (Utrecht institute of Linguistics)/OTS (Onderzoeksinstituut voor Taal en Spraak).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Diane Brentari, Purdue University, Indiana
  • Book: Sign Languages
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Diane Brentari, Purdue University, Indiana
  • Book: Sign Languages
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Diane Brentari, Purdue University, Indiana
  • Book: Sign Languages
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.028
Available formats
×