Strategy as character: Bismarck and the Prusso-German question, 1862–1878

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511974182.004

4 - Strategy as character: Bismarck and the Prusso-German question, 1862–1878

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Marcus Jones

Edited by

Williamson Murray ,

Richard Hart Sinnreich and

James Lacey

Show author details

Marcus Jones: Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Academy
Williamson Murray: Affiliation:
Ohio State University
James Lacey: Affiliation:
Marine Corps War College

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Germany, situated at the heart of Europe, is Europe's heart. Europe cannot “live” without a sound, strong heart. I have devoted much attention to Bismarck in recent years, and his stature as a diplomat grows continually in my eyes. It is deplorable what a false picture we ourselves have created of him in the world – the politician of force wearing cuirassier's boots – in our childlike pleasure that someone had finally made Germany count for something again. He had a unique skill at creating trust in the world, just the opposite of today. In truth, his great gifts were diplomacy of the highest order, and moderation.

Otto von Bismarck – “the greatest master of diplomacy in the modern era” – is nearly too massive a subject for the modern historian. No historical figure bears more responsibility for the state of great power politics in the long period between 1815 and 1945, and few, if any, in history have managed the strategic policy of their states with such virtuosity. His decisions and policies established the groundwork for the most important geopolitical events of the twentieth century, and his principal creation, a German nation-state at the heart of Europe, endures in truncated form after a half-century of painful adaptation to the world without his guidance.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Shaping of Grand Strategy
Policy, Diplomacy, and War
, pp. 79 - 110

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974182.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Taylor, A. J. P., Bismarck: The Man and the Statesman (New York, 1967), p. 111.Google Scholar

Pflanze, Otto, Bismarck and the Development of Germany, 3 vols., 3rd ed. (Princeton, 1990)Google Scholar

Gall, Lothar, Bismarck: Der weisse Revolutionär, 2 vols. (Berlin, 1980)Google Scholar

Engelberg, Ernst, Bismarck: Urpreusse und Reichsgründer (Berlin, 1985).Google Scholar

Böhme, Helmut, Deutschlands Weg zur Grossmacht: Studien zum Verhältnis von Wirtschaft und Staat während der Reichsgründungszeit 1848–1881 (Köln, 1966)Google Scholar

Franz, Eugen, Der Entscheidungskampf um die wirtschaftspolitische Führung Deutschlands (1856–1867), vol. 12, Schriftenreihe zur bayrischen Landesgeschichte (München, 1933)Google Scholar

Franz, , “Graf Rechbergs deutsche Zollpolitik,” Mitteilungen des Instituts für österreichische Geschichtsforschung 46 (1932), pp. 143–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Etges, Andreas, Wirtschaftsnationalismus: USA und Deutschland im Vergleich 1815–1914 (Frankfurt a.M., 1999).Google Scholar

Busch, Moritz, Bismarck: Some Secret Pages from His History, vol. 1 (London, 1898), p. 130.Google Scholar

Steefel, Lawrence D., The Schleswig-Holstein Question (Cambridge, 1932), p. 95Google Scholar

Srbik, Heinrich Ritter, “Die Schönnbrunner Konferenzen vom August 1864,” Historische Zeitschrift 153 (1936), pp. 43–88Google Scholar

Lipgens, Walter, “Bismarcks Österreich-Politik vor 1866: Die Urheberschaft des Schönbrunner Vertragsentwurfs vom August 1864,” Die Welt als Geschichte 10 (1950), pp. 240–62Google Scholar

Becker, Otto, “Der Sinn der dualistischen Verständigungsversuche Bismarcks vor dem Kriege 1866,” Historische Zeitschrift 169 (1949), pp. 264–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Holborn, Hajo, “Über die Staatskunst Bismarcks,” Zeitwende 3 (1927), pp. 321–34Google Scholar

Elrod, Richard B., “Bernhard von Rechberg and the Metternichian Tradition: The Dilemma of Conservative Statecraft,” Journal of Modern History 56 (1984), pp. 430–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul, “International Politics, Peace, and War, 1815–1914,” in T. C. W. Blanning, ed., The Nineteenth Century (Oxford, 2000), p. 180Google Scholar

Gruner, Wolf D., “Bayern, Preussen und die süddeutschen Staaten 1866–1870,” Zeitschrift für bayrische Landesgeschichte 38 (1974), pp. 799–927Google Scholar

Wetzel, David, “Bismarck, South Germany, and the Problem of 1870,” in David Wetzel, ed., From the Berlin Museum to the Berlin Wall: Essays on the Cultural and Political History of Modern Germany (Westport, 1996)Google Scholar

Becker, Josef, “Bismarcks spanische ‘Diversion:’ 1870 und der preussisch-deutsche Reichgründung,” Central European History 37 (2004), p. 610.Google Scholar

Hillgruber, Andreas, Bismarcks Außenpolitik, 3rd ed. (Freiburg, 1993), p. 131.Google Scholar

Japikse, Nikolas, Europa and Bismarcks Friedenspolitik (Berlin, 1927)Google Scholar

Noack, Ulrich, Bismarcks Friedenspolitik und das Problem des deutschen Machtverfalls (Leipzig, 1928)Google Scholar

Mommsen, Wolfgang J., Großmachtstellung und Weltpolitik: Die Außenpolitik des deutschen Reichs 1870–1914 (Frankfurt, 1993)Google Scholar

Kennan, George, The Decline of Bismarck's European Order: Franco-Russian Relations, 1875–1890 (Princeton, 1979)Google Scholar

Langer, William, European Alliances and Alignments 1871–1890, 2nd ed. (New York, 1950)Google Scholar

Geiss, Imanuel, German Foreign Policy, 1871–1914 (London, 1976).Google Scholar

Book contents

4 - Strategy as character: Bismarck and the Prusso-German question, 1862–1878

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive