Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:42:49.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2020

Pascale Aebischer
Pascale Aebischer
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare, Spectatorship and the Technologies of Performance , pp. 219 - 235
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, Mitra and Tuck, Fiona, ‘Understanding the Impact of Event Cinema: An Evidence Review’, Arts Council England, 2 November 2015.Google Scholar
Aebischer, Pascale, ‘Broadcasting a Multi-Faceted Duchess from the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse: Sightlines, Sinister Camerawork and Websterian Dramaturgy’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 38 (forthcoming, 2020).Google Scholar
Aebischer, Pascale, ‘Performing Shakespeare through Social Media’, in Callaghan, Dympna and Gossett, Suzanne (eds.), Shakespeare in our Time (London: Bloomsbury, 2016), pp. 99–103.Google Scholar
Aebischer, Pascale, Screening Early Modern Drama: Beyond Shakespeare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Aebischer, Pascale, Shakespeare’s Violated Bodies: Stage and Screen Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Aebischer, Pascale, ‘South Bank Shakespeare Goes Global: Broadcasting from Shakespeare’s Globe and the National Theatre’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 113–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aebischer, Pascale, ‘Technology and the Ethics of Spectatorship’, in Bulman, James C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Performance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 302–20.Google Scholar
Aebischer, Pascale and Greenhalgh, Susanne, ‘Introduction: Shakespeare and the “Live” Theatre Broadcast Experience’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Thomas P., Performing Early Modern Trauma from Shakespeare to Milton (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Andrejevic, Mark, ‘Watching Television without Pity: The Productivity of Online Fans’, Television & New Media, 9.1 (2008), 24–46.Google Scholar
Arts Council England, ‘Equality, Diversity and the Creative Case: A Data Report, 2016–17’, January 2018.Google Scholar
Arts Council England, ‘Great Art and Culture for Everyone: 10-Year Strategic Framework, 2010–2020’, second edition, uploaded 30 October 2013 (available at www.artscouncil.org.uk/great-art-and-culture-everyone, accessed 16 December 2019).Google Scholar
Auslander, Philip, Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture, 2nd edition (Abingdon: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Barker, Martin, Live to Your Local Cinema: The Remarkable Rise of Livecasting, Kindle book (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar
Barker, Roberta, ‘“A Freshly Creepy Reality”: Jacobean Tragedy and Realist Acting on the Contemporary Stage’, in Aebischer, Pascale and Prince, Kathryn (eds.), Performing Early Modern Drama Today (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 121–41.Google Scholar
Barker, Roberta, Solga, Kim, and Mazer, Cary, ‘Tis Pity She’s a Realist: A Conversational Case Study in Realism and Early Modern Theater Today’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 31.4 (2013), 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, Roland, Le Plaisir du texte, in Œuvres complètes, vol. 4 (Paris: Seuil, 2002).Google Scholar
Baugh, Christopher, Theatre, Performance and Technology: The Development of Scenography in the 20th Century (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Bay-Cheng, Sarah, ‘Theatre Squared: Theatre History in the Age of Media’, Theatre Topics, 17.1 (2007), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrent, Michael C., ‘Foucault and Technology’, History and Technology, 29.1 (2013), 54–104.Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine, The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama (London: Methuen, 1985).Google Scholar
Bennett, Susan, Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Bentley, Gerald Eades, ‘Shakespeare and the Blackfriars Theatre’, Shakespeare Survey, 1 (1966), 47–50.Google Scholar
Bessell, Jacqueline, ‘The Actors’ Renaissance Season at the Blackfriars Playhouse’, in Aebischer, Pascale and Prince, Kathryn (eds.), Performing Early Modern Drama Today (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 85–103.Google Scholar
Betancourt, Michael, Glitch Art in Theory and Practice: Critical Failures and Post-Digital Aesthetics (New York: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Billington, Michael, ‘National Theatre Live: Phèdre’, The Guardian, 26 June 2009.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael, ‘The Tempest Review: Beale’s Superb Prospero Haunts Hi-Tech Spectacle’, The Guardian, 18 November 2016.Google Scholar
Blake, Bill, Theatre & the Digital (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar
Bloom, Gina, Gaming the Stage: Playable Media and the Rise of English Commercial Theater (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Bloom, Gina, ‘Rough Magic: Performing Shakespeare through Gaming Technology’, Shakespeare Birthday Lecture, Folger Shakespeare Library, 9 April 2019 (available at www.ecosia.org/search?q=Rough+Magic%3A+Performing+Shakespeare+Through+Gaming+Technology&addon=chrome&addonversion=2.1.0).Google Scholar
Boehrer, Bruce, ‘Alsemero’s Closet: Privacy and Interiority in The Changeling’, The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 96.3 (1997), 349–68.Google Scholar
Bogost, Ian, Alien Phenomenology: or What It’s Like to Be a Thing (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogost, Ian, ‘I Became a Fan of Marshall McLuhan on Facebook and Suggested that You Become a Fan, Too’, in Wittkower, D. E. (ed.), Facebook and Philosophy: What’s on Your Mind? (Chicago, IL: Open Court, 2010), pp. 21–32.Google Scholar
Borsuk, Amy, ‘Innovating Shakespeare: The Politics of Technological Partnership in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s The Tempest (2016)’, Humanities, 8.42 (2019), 1–14.Google Scholar
Boyle, Jennifer Ellen, Anamorphosis in Early Modern Literature: Mediation and Affect (London: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar
Brook, Peter, The Empty Space (London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1968).Google Scholar
Brook, Peter, The Shifting Point: 40 Years of Theatrical Exploration, 1946–87 (London: Methuen, 1989).Google Scholar
Bucknall, Joanna and Sedgman, Kirsty, ‘Documenting Audience Experience: Social Media as Lively Stratification’, in Sant, Toni (ed.), Documenting Performance: The Context and Processes of Digital Curation and Archiving (London: Bloomsbury, 2017), pp. 113–30.Google Scholar
Bulman, James C., ‘Spectatorship, Remediation, and One Hundred Years of Hamlet’, in Callaghan, Dympna and Gossett, Suzanne (eds.), Shakespeare in Our Time (London: Bloomsbury, 2016), pp. 91–8.Google Scholar
Burrell, Ian, ‘New Camera Technology Meant Wolf Hall Adaptation Could Be Shot by Candlelight’, The Independent, 12 December 2014.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Calbi, Maurizio, Spectral Shakespeares: Media Adaptations in the Twenty-First Century (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar
Calbi, Maurizio and O’Neill, Stephen, ‘Introduction: #SocialmediaShakespeares’, Borrowers and Lenders, 10.1 (2016), 1–16.Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin, The Haunted Stage: The Theatre as Memory Machine (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin, Places of Performance: The Semiotics of Theatre Architecture (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin, ‘Theatre Audiences and the Reading of Performance’, in Postlewait, Thomas and McConachie, Bruce A. (eds.), Interpreting the Theatrical Past: Essays in the Historiography of Performance (Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, 1989), pp. 82–98.Google Scholar
Cartelli, Thomas, Reenacting Shakespeare in the Shakespeare Aftermath: The Intermedial Turn and Turn to Embodiment (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).Google Scholar
Causey, Matthew, Theatre and Performance in Digital Culture: From Simulation to Embeddedness (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Cavendish, Dominic, ‘The RSC’s Tempest: Lord of the Rings-Style Magic and the Welcome Return of Simon Russell Beale’, The Telegraph, 18 November 2016.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Dominic, ‘The Tempest Is a Magical Last Bow for the Globe’s Dominic Dromgoole’, The Telegraph, 25 February 2016.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Shohini, Feminist Film Theorists: Laura Mulvey, Kaja Silverman, Teresa de Lauretis, Barbara Creed (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Cheek by Jowl, , ‘Measure for Measure Education Pack 16+’, 2015 (available at www.cheekbyjowl.com/education-packs/measure-for-measure-pack-preview/).Google Scholar
Clachan, Lizzie, ‘Set Design and Edward II: Interview with Lizzie Clachan’, in James, Jeff (ed.), Background Pack: Edward II by Christopher Marlowe (London: National Theatre Learning, 2013), pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Bernadette and Bonner, Frances, ‘Screening from the Met, the NT or the House: What Changes with the Live Relay’, Adaptation, 7.2 (2014), 121–33.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ralph Alan, ‘The Most Convenient Place: The Second Blackfriars Theater and Its Appeal’, in Dutton, Richard (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theatre (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 209–24.Google Scholar
Collins, David L, ‘Anamorphosis and the Eccentric Observer: Inverted Perspective and Construction of the Gaze’, Leonardo, 25.1 (1992), 73–82.Google Scholar
Collins, Nicholas, ‘“This Prison Where I Live”: Ireland Takes Centre Stage’, Cahiers Élisabéthains, 88 (2015), 125–38.Google Scholar
Conkie, Rob, The Globe Theatre Project: Shakespeare and Authenticity (Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Conkie, Rob, Writing Performative Shakespeares (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Constable, Neil and Rice, Emma, ‘Press Release: Statement Regarding the Artistic Direction of Shakespeare’s Globe’, Shakespeare’s Globe, 25 October 2016.Google Scholar
Cornford, Tom, ‘Reconstructing Theatre: The Globe under Dominic Dromgoole’, New Theatre Quarterly, 26.4 (2010), 319–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas, ‘Optics’, in Turner, Henry S. (ed.), Early Modern Theatricality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 250–69.Google Scholar
Criado-Perez, Caroline, Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men, Kindle book (London: Chatto & Windus, 2019).Google Scholar
Daalder, Joost, ‘The Closet Drama in “The Changeling”, V.III’, Modern Philology, 89.2 (1991), 225–30.Google Scholar
Davidson, Clifford, ‘The Masque within The Tempest’, Notre Dame English Journal, 10.1/2 (1976), 12–17.Google Scholar
Davies, Callan, ‘Strange Devices on the Jacobean Stage: Image, Spectacle, and the Materialisation of Morality’ (PhD Thesis, University of Exeter, 2015).Google Scholar
Davis, Emma, ‘Cheek by Jowl: Measure for Measure Live Stream Screenplay’, Cheek by Jowl web archive, 2015 (available at www.cheekbyjowl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Measure-for-Measure-livestream-screenplay.pdf).Google Scholar
de Lauretis, Teresa, Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film and Fiction (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Delbridge, Matt, Motion Capture in Performance: An Introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).Google Scholar
Demaray, John G., Shakespeare and the Spectacles of Strangeness: The Tempest and the Transformation of Renaissance Theatrical Forms (Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Dixon, Steve, with contributions by Barry Smith, Digital Performance: A History of New Media in Theater, Dance, Performance Art, and Installation (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Donaldson, Alastair, ‘All the World’s: How Shakespeare Is Viewed around the Globe and the Role His Work Can Play to Support the UK’s Soft Power’, British Council, 2016.Google Scholar
Doran, Gregory, ‘Director’s Commentary’, The Tempest (2016), RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon DVD, 2017.Google Scholar
Doran, Gregory, Mallyon, Catherine and Whyman, Erica, ‘Diversity in the Arts’, RSC News, Features and Updates, December 2016.Google Scholar
Dromgoole, Dominic, ‘Let Your Indulgence Set Me Free’, The Guardian, 23 April 2016.Google Scholar
Dromgoole, Dominic, ‘Shakespeare: The Playwright Who Brings the World Closer’, The Guardian, 23 April 2016.Google Scholar
Dromgoole, Dominic, ‘Welcome to the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse’, Programme for The Duchess of Malfi, January 2014.Google Scholar
Dustagheer, Sarah, ‘Acoustic and Visual Practices Indoors’, in Gurr, Andrew and Karim-Cooper, Farah (eds.), Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 137–51.Google Scholar
Dustagheer, Sarah, ‘“Intimacy” at the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 35.1 (2017), 227-246.Google Scholar
Dustagheer, Sarah, Shakespeare’s Two Playhouses: Repertory and Theatre Space at the Globe and the Blackfriars, 1599–1613 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Dyer, Richard, White: Twentieth Anniversary Edition (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Dymkowski, Christine, The Tempest: Shakespeare in Production (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Elleström, Lars, ‘The Modalities of Media: A Model for Understanding Intermedial Relations’, in Elleström, Lars (ed.), Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 11–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escolme, Bridget, ‘Review: The Duchess of Malfi, The Knight of the Burning Pestle, and The Malcontent: Shakespeare's Globe, January–April 2014’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 65.2 (2014), 209–18.Google Scholar
Escolme, Bridget, Talking to the Audience: Shakespeare, Performance, Self (Abingdon: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Evans, Dean, ‘Cinematic Special Effects Come to Live Theatre’, Intel: Entertainment, 31 October 2016.Google Scholar
Fairservice, Don, Film Editing: History, Theory and Practice (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Faulkner, Sally, ‘Introduction: Approaching the Middlebrow: Audience; Text; Institution’, in Faulkner, Sally (ed.), Middlebrow Cinema (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Fazel, Valerie M and Geddes, Louise, ‘Introduction: The Shakespeare User’, in Fazel, Valerie M. and Geddes, Louise (eds.), The Shakespeare User: Critical and Creative Appropriations in a Networked Culture (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Fischlin, Daniel, ed. OuterSpeares: Shakespeare, Intermedia, and the Limits of Adaptation (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Tim, Playwright, Space and Place in Early Modern Performance: Shakespeare and Company (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011).Google Scholar
Frankl, Ed, ‘Dominic Dromgoole: “Other Countries Perform Shakespeare Better Than Us”’, The Stage, 25 April 2014.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, ‘The Theory of the Public Sphere: The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (1962)’, in Bunkhorst, Hauke, Kreide, Regina and Lafont, Cristina (eds.), The Habermas Handbook (New York: Columbia University Press, 2018), pp. 245–55.Google Scholar
Freshwater, Helen, Theatre & Audience (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael D., ‘The Shakespeare Cinemacast: Coriolanus’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 67.4 (2016), 457–80.Google Scholar
Frost, Briony, ‘Shakespeare and the “Absent” Audience: Un/heard Applause During the National Theatre Live’s Early Modern Play Broadcasts’, Unpublished paper, Shakespeare, Media, Performance and Technology conference, University of Exeter, 24 June 2017.Google Scholar
Furness, Hannah, ‘Shakespeare’s Globe Risks Wrath after Installing ‘Sixth Form Disco’, The Telegraph, 5 May 2016.Google Scholar
Galton, Bridget, ‘An Insight into the Real World on Life’s Stage’, etcetera, 12 May 2011.Google Scholar
Gamwell, Lynn, Mathematics + Art: A Cultural History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Gardner, Lyn, ‘The Bold, the Old, and the Obsolete’, The Guardian, 27 April 2009.Google Scholar
Gardner, Lyn, ‘Emma Rice is Right to Experiment at the Globe’, The Guardian blog, 28 September 2016.Google Scholar
Gardner, Lyn, ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream – Review’, The Guardian, 6 May 2016.Google Scholar
Gardner, Lyn, ‘Why Theatres Need to Get Out More’, The Guardian, 25 September 2013.Google Scholar
Giannachi, Gabriella, Virtual Theatres: An Introduction (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Giannachi, Gabriella, Kaye, Nick and Shanks, Michael, ‘Introduction: Archaeologies of Presence’, in Giannachi, Gabriella, Kaye, Nick and Shanks, Michael (eds.), Archaeologies of Presence: Art, Performance and the Persistence of Being (London: Routledge, 2012), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Giesekam, Greg, Staging the Screen: The Use of Film and Video in Theatre (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).Google Scholar
Godwin, Simon, Director’s Commentary, RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon DVD, Hamlet (2016).Google Scholar
Gorton, Ceri, ‘Space to Play: Making Arts & Technology Collaborations Work’, RSC, 2017 (available at www.rsc.org.uk/news/archive/what-makes-arts-and-technology-partnerships-work).Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen, Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Greenfield, Jon, with McCurdy, Peter, ‘Practical Evidence for a Reimagined Indoor Jacobean Theatre’, in Gurr, Andrew and Karim-Cooper, Farah (eds.), Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 32–64.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Susanne, ‘Guest Editor’s Introduction’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 32.2 (2014), 255–61.Google Scholar
Grehan, Helena, Performance, Ethics and Spectatorship in a Global Age (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar
Grotowski, Jerzy, Towards a Poor Theatre, ed. Barba, Eugenio (New York: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
Groves, Nancy, ‘Arts Head: David Sabel, Head of Digital, National Theatre’, The Guardian, 10 April 2012.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew, ‘The New Fashion for Indoor Plays’, in Gurr, Andrew and Karim-Cooper, Farah (eds.), Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 203–16.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew, ‘The Tempest’s Tempest at the Blackfriars’, Shakespeare Survey, 41 (1988), 91–102.Google Scholar
Haber, Judith, ‘“I(t) could not choose but follow”: Erotic Logic in The Changeling’, Representations, 81 (2003), 79–98.Google Scholar
Halliday, Rob, ‘Backstage: How the National Reinvented Theatre’, The Stage, 24 October 2016.Google Scholar
Hancock, David, ‘The End of an Era Arrives as Digital Technology Displaces 35mm Film in Cinema Projection’, Press Release, IHS Technology, 15 November 2011.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J., ‘Cyborg Manifesto’, in her Manifestly Haraway (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2016), pp. 3–90.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine, How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, The Question Concerning Technology, trans. William Lovitt (New York: Harper & Row, 1977).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Die Technik und die Kehre (Pfullingen: Neske, 1963).Google Scholar
Heim, Caroline, Audience as Performer: The Changing Role of Theatre Audiences in the Twenty-First Century (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Hemming, Sarah, ‘The Tempest, Sam Wanamaker Theatre, London – Review’, Financial Times, 26 February 2016.Google Scholar
Hewison, Robert, Holden, John and Jones, Samuel, All Together: A Creative Approach to Organisational Change (London: Demos, 2010).Google Scholar
Hill-Gibbins, Joe, ‘Joe Hill-Gibbins and John Heffernan Present an Anarchic Edward II’, chaired by Matt Trueman, TheatreVoice, 17 October 2013 (available at www.theatrevoice.com/audio/joe-hill-gibbins-and-john-heffernan-on-edward-ii/).Google Scholar
Hjarvard, Stig, ‘The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change’, Nordicom Review, 29.2 (2008), 105–34.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Lisa, ‘Acting the Act in The Changeling’, Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 8 (1995), 107–11.Google Scholar
Huertas Martín, Víctor, ‘The Tempest de William Shakespeare, dirigida por Gregory Doran (Royal Shakespeare Company, 2016–2017). Dialéctica entre tecnología virtual y corporalidad’, Diablotexto Digital, 3 (2018), 43–74.Google Scholar
Hurley, Erin, Theatre & Feeling (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda, with O’Flynn, Siobhan, A Theory of Adaptation, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Hutchings, Mark, ‘De Flores Between the Acts’, Studies in Theatre and Performance 31.1 (2011), 95–111.Google Scholar
Hytner, Nicholas, Balancing Acts: Behind the Scenes at the National Theatre (London: Vintage, 2017).Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Mariko, The Shakespearean Stage Space (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim, ‘From the Transmission of Representations to the Education of Attention’, in Whitehouse, H. (ed.), The Debated Mind: Evolutionary Psychology versus Ethnography (Oxford: Berg, 2001), pp. 113–53.Google Scholar
James, Jeff, ‘Rehearsal Diary’, in James, Jeff (ed.), Background Pack: Edward II by Christopher Marlowe (London: National Theatre Learning, 2013), pp. 5–10.Google Scholar
Jarrett, Kylie and Naji, Jeneen, ‘What Would Media Studies Do? Social Media Shakespeare as a Technosocial Process’, Borrowers and Lenders, 10.1 (2016), 1–11.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Henry, Convergence Culture: When Old and New Media Collide (New York: New York University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Jenkins, Henry, Ford, Sam and Green, Joshua, Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Jones, Gwylim, Shakespeare’s Storms (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Jowett, John, ‘New Created Creatures: Ralph Crane and the Stage Directions in The Tempest’, Shakespeare Survey, 36 (1983), 107–20.Google Scholar
Karim-Cooper, Farah, ‘The Performance of Early Modern Drama at Shakespeare’s Globe’, in Aebischer, Pascale and Prince, Kathryn (eds.), Performing Early Modern Drama Today (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 53–69.Google Scholar
Kember, Sarah and Zylinska, Joanna, Life after New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012).Google Scholar
King, Joyce E., ‘Dysconscious Racism: Ideology, Identity, and the Miseducation of Teachers’, in Cashmore, E. and Jennings, J. (eds.), Racism: Essential Readings (London: Sage Publications, 2001), pp. 295–303.Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter, ‘Cheek by Jowl: Reframing Complicity in Web-Streams of Measure for Measure’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 161–73.Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter, ‘Edward II (National) @ The Olivier, National Theatre’, Bardathon blog, 9 September 2013 (available at https://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/bardathon/2013/09/09/edward-ii-national-the-olivier-national-theatre/).Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter, ‘Measure for Measure (Cheek by Jowl) @ The Silk Street Theatre, Barbican’, The Bardathon blog, 17 April 2015 (available at http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/bardathon/2015/04/17/measure-for-measure-cheek-by-jowl-the-silk-street-theatre-barbican/).Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter, ‘Review of Shakespeare's Roman Tragedies (Coriolanus, Julius Caesar, Antony and Cleopatra) (directed by Ivo Van Hove for Toneelgroep Amsterdam) at the Barbican, London, 20 November 2009’, Shakespeare, 6.4 (2010), 478–82.Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter, Shakespeare in the Theatre: Cheek by Jowl (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).Google Scholar
Kitamura, Sae, ‘The Curious Incident of Shakespeare Fans in NTLive: Public Screenings and Fan Culture in Japan’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 277–84.Google Scholar
Kozel, Susan, Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology (Boston, MA: MIT, 2007).Google Scholar
LaGrandeur, Kevin, Androids and Intelligent Networks in Early Modern Literature and Culture: Artificial Slaves (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Lamm, Claus, Decety, Jean and Singer, Tania, ‘Meta-Analytic Evidence for Common and Distinct Neural Networks Associated with Directly Experienced Pain and Empathy for Pain’, NeuroImage, 54 (2011), 2492–502.Google Scholar
Langley, Eric, Narcissism and Suicide in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Lavender, Andy, ‘Mise en scène, Hypermediacy and the Sensorium’, in Chapple, Freda and Kattenbelt, Chiel (eds.), Intermediality in Theatre and Performance (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006), pp. 55–66.Google Scholar
Lavender, Andy, Performance in the Twenty-First Century: Theatres of Engagement (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney and Way, Geoffrey, ‘Young Turks or Corporate Clones? Cognitive Capitalism and the (Young) User in the Shakespearean Attention Economy’, in Fazel, Valerie M. and Geddes, Louise (eds.), The Shakespeare User: Critical and Creative Appropriations in a Networked Culture (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp. 63–79.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hans-Thies, Postdramatic Theatre, trans. Karen Jürs-Munby (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hans-Thies, Postdramatisches Theater, 3rd updated and enlarged edition (Darmstadt: Verlag der Autoren, 2005).Google Scholar
Levin, Laura, Performing Ground: Space, Camouflage, and the Art of Blending In (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar
Liedke, Heidi, ‘Emancipating the Spectator? Livecasting, Liveness and the Feeling I’, Performance Matters, 5.2 (2019), 6–23.Google Scholar
Lin, Erika T., Shakespeare and the Materiality of Performance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).Google Scholar
Loftus, Becky and Rushby, Amy, ‘Views of Dreaming: What Did People Think?’, Audience survey commissioned by the RSC, 2013.Google Scholar
Lonergan, Patrick, Theatre & Social Media (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar
McAuley, Gay, Space in Performance: Making Meaning in the Theatre (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Machon, Josephine, Immersive Theatres: Intimacy and Immediacy in Contemporary Performance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar
Mackintosh, Iain, ‘Democratic Design Is Bad for Theatres’, The Guardian, 19 January 2015.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, Iain, Architecture, Actor and Audience (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964).Google Scholar
McMullan, Gordon, Shakespeare and the Idea of Late Writing: Authorship in the Proximity of Death (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Madelaine, Richard, ‘“The Dark and Vicious Place”: The Location of Sexual Transgression and Its Punishment on the Early Modern English Stage’, Parergon, 22.1 (2005), 159–83.Google Scholar
Maguire, Laurie and Smith, Emma, ‘What Is a Source? Or, How Shakespeare Read His Marlowe’, Shakespeare Survey, 68 (2015), 15–31.Google Scholar
Malague, Rose, ‘Theatrical Realism as Feminist Intervention: Katie Mitchell’s 2011 Staging of A Woman Killed with Kindness’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 31.4 (2013), 623–45.Google Scholar
Mancewicz, Aneta, Intermedial Shakespeares on European Stages (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar
Marowitz, Charles, Programme note, 1964 revival, King Lear, dir. Peter Brook, assistant dir. Charles Marowitz.Google Scholar
Masso, Giverny, ‘National Theatre Criticised for “Dispiriting” All-Male Programme of Work’, The Stage, 29 March 2019.Google Scholar
Menzer, Paul, Shakespeare in the Theatre: The American Shakespeare Center (London: Bloomsbury, 2017).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Robert, Bioart and the Vitality of Media (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Monaco, James, How to Read a Film: The Art, Technology, Language, History, and Theory of Film and Media (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Mori, Masahiro, ‘The Uncanny Valley’, Karl F. MacDorman and Norri Kageki (trans.), in IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine (June 2012 [1970]), pp. 98-100.Google Scholar
Morrison, John, ‘Imogen’, London Theatre Reviews by John Morrison blog, 21 September 2016.Google Scholar
Mulvey, Laura, Visual and Other Pleasures (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Munro, Lucy, ‘Alarums: Edward II and the Staging of History’, in Melnikoff, Kirk and Knutson, Roslyn L. (eds.), Christopher Marlowe, Theatrical Commerce, and the Book Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 68–80.Google Scholar
Munro, Lucy, The Children of the Queen’s Revels: A Jacobean Theatre Repertory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
National Theatre, ‘5 Reasons to See Edward II at the National Theatre’, The Londonist, 20 August 2013.Google Scholar
Naylor, Richard, Lewis, Bethany, Branzanti, Caterina, Devlin, Graham and Dix, Alan, ‘Analysis of Theatre in England’, Arts Council England, 2016 (available at https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/ACE_Theatre_Analysis_BOP_FINAL_REPORT_Feb_2017.pdf).Google Scholar
Nead, Lynda, The Female Nude: Art, Obscenity and Sexuality (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Nelson, Ryan, ‘Developing a Digital Strategy: Developing Audiences at Shakespeare’s Globe’, in Carson, Christie and Kirwan, Peter (eds.), Shakespeare and the Digital World: Redefining Scholarship and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 202–11.Google Scholar
NESTA, ‘NT Live: Digital Broadcast of Theatre: Learning from the Pilot Season’, 2010.Google Scholar
Nice, David, ‘Edward II, National Theatre’, The Arts Desk, 5 September 2013.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Rachael, ‘Understanding “New” Encounters with Shakespeare: Hybrid Media and Emerging Audience Behaviours’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
O’Flynn, Siobhan, ‘Epilogue’, in Hutcheon, Linda, with O’Flynn, Siobhan, A Theory of Adaptation, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 179–206.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Stephen, ‘Ophelian Negotiations: Remediating the Girl on YouTube’, Borrowers and Lenders, 9.1 (2014), 1–22.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Stephen, ‘Shakespeare and Social Media’, Literature Compass, 12.6 (2015), 274–85.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Stephen, Shakespeare and YouTube: New Media Forms of the Bard (London: Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen, ‘To Make Boards to Speak: Inigo Jones’s Stage and the Jonsonian Masque’, Renaissance Drama n.s., 1 (1968), 121–52.Google Scholar
Orpen, Valerie, Film Editing: The Art of the Expressive (London: Wallflower Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Osborne, Laurie E., ‘iShakespeare: Digital Art/Games, Intermediality and the Future of Shakespearean Film’, Shakespeare Studies, 38 (2010), 48–57.Google Scholar
Papagiannouli, Christina, Political Cyberperformance: The eTheatre Project (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).Google Scholar
Parker-Starbuck, Jennifer, Cyborg Theatre: Corporeal/Technological Intersections in Multimedia Performance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar
Parkinson, Andy and Buttrick, Jamie, ‘Equality and Diversity within the Arts and Cultural Sector in England, 2013–16: Evidence Review’, Consilium Research & Consultancy for Arts Council England, 13 November 2018.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel, ‘The Changeling’, in Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (eds.), Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 1632–6.Google Scholar
Paulson, Michael, ‘At This “Tempest,” Digital Wizardry Makes “Rough Magic”’, The New York Times, 4 January 2017.Google Scholar
Pearson, Roberta, ‘Fandom in the Digital Era’, Popular Communication, 8.1 (2010), 84–95.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy, ‘Marina Abramović: Witnessing Shadows’, Theatre Journal, 56.4 (2004), 569–77.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy, Unmarked: The Politics of Performance (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Popat, Sita and Preece, Kelly, ‘Pluralistic Presence: Practising Embodiment with My Avatar’, in Broadhurst, Susan and Machon, Josephine (eds.), Identity, Performance and Technology: Practices of Empowerment, Embodiment and Technicity (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), pp. 160–74.Google Scholar
Price, Eoin, ‘Desperate Measures’, asidenotes blog, 27 April 2015 (available at https://asidenotes.wordpress.com/2015/04/27/measuring-measure/).Google Scholar
Purcell, Stephen, ‘The Impact of New Forms of Public Performance’, in Desmet, Christy and Kirwan, Peter (eds.), Shakespeare and the Digital World: Redefining Scholarship and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 212–25.Google Scholar
Purcell, Stephen, ‘“It’s All a Bit of a Risk”: Reformulating “Liveness” in Twenty-First Century Performances of Shakespeare’, in Bulman, James C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Performance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 284–301.Google Scholar
Purcell, Stephen, ‘King Lear, Donmar Warehouse’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 32.2 (2014), 264–6.Google Scholar
Purcell, Stephen, ‘Shakespeare Performances in England, 2016’, Shakespeare Survey 70 (2017), 287–325.Google Scholar
Purcell, Stephen, ‘Shakespeare Performances in England, 2017’, Shakespeare Survey, 71 (2018), 305–43.Google Scholar
Purcell, Stephen, Shakespeare and Audience in Practice (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar
Quarmby, Kevin, ‘OP PC or PaR RIP?’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 36.4 (2018), 567–98.Google Scholar
Raby, Julie, ‘A View from the Stalls: The Audience’s Experience in the Theatre during the RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon Broadcasts’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 103–9.Google Scholar
Rajewsky, Irina O., ‘Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality’, Intermédialités, 6 (2005), 43–64.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques, The Emancipated Spectator, trans. Gregory Elliott (London: Verso, 2006).Google Scholar
Rayner, Alice, Ghosts: Death’s Double and the Phenomena of Theatre (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Read, Claire, ‘Performance ⇔ Documentation: Disrupting Ontologies’ (PhD Thesis, University of Roehampton, 2017).Google Scholar
Rebellato, Dan, ‘Playing Puck’, Dan Rebellato blog, 27 June 2013 (available at www.danrebellato.co.uk/spilledink/2013/6/25/playing-puck).Google Scholar
Reid, Francis, Designing for the Theatre, 2nd edition (New York: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Reidy, Brent Karpf, Schutt, Becky, Abramson, Deborah and Durski, Antoni, ‘From Live-to-Digital: Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution’, Arts Council UK, October 2016.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Brian and Thompson, Ayanna, ‘Inspriteful Ariel: Transversal Tempests’, in Reynolds, Brian (ed.), Performing Transversally: Reimagining Shakespeare and the Critical Future (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), pp. 189–214.Google Scholar
Ridout, Nicholas, Stage Fright, Animals, and Other Theatrical Problems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Ridout, Nicholas, Theatre & Ethics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar
Rodosthenous, George, ‘Staring at the Forbidden: Legitimizing Voyeurism’, in Rodosthenous, George (ed.), Theatre as Voyeurism: The Pleasures of Watching (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Rogers, Jami, ‘The Shakespearean Glass Ceiling: The State of Colorblind Casting in Contemporary British Theatre’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 31.3 (2013), 405–30.Google Scholar
Rogers, Jami, ‘Talawa and Black Theatre Live: “Creating the Ira Aldridges That Are Remembered” – Live Theatre Broadcast and the Historical Record’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 147–73.Google Scholar
Rokison, Abigail, Shakespeare in the Theatre: Nicholas Hytner (London: Bloomsbury, 2017).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Daniel, The National Theatre Story (London: Oberon Books, 2013).Google Scholar
Roth, Lorna, ‘Looking at Shirley, the Ultimate Norm: Colour Balance, Image Technologies, and Cognitive Equity’, Canadian Journal of Communication, 34 (2009), 111–36.Google Scholar
Rumbold, Kate, ‘From “Access” to “Creativity”: Shakespeare Institutions, New Media, and the Language of Cultural Value’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 61.3 (2010), 313–36.Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure, ‘Cyberspace, Virtuality, and the Text’, in Ryan, Marie-Laure (ed.), Cyberspace Textuality: Computer Technology and Literary Theory (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1999), pp. 78–107.Google Scholar
Saltz, David Z., ‘Live Media: Interactive Technology and Theatre’, Theatre Topics, 11.2 (2001), 107–30.Google Scholar
Schafer, Liz, ‘Review: The Duchess of Malfi’, Times Higher Education, 16 January 2014.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard, ‘6 Axioms for Environmental Theatre’, The Drama Review: TDR, 12.3 (1968), 41–64.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard, Between Theater and Anthropology (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Schneider, Rebecca, Performance Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Sedgman, Kirsty, The Reasonable Audience: Theatre Etiquette, Behaviour Policing, and the Live Performance Experience (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).Google Scholar
Globe, Shakespeare’s, ‘This Magical Space: Emma Rice’s Top 10 Globe Moments’, Medium.com, 20 April 2018.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, Robert, ‘Connecting the Globe: Actors, Audience and Entrainment’, Shakespeare Survey, 68 (2015), 294–305.Google Scholar
Shenton, Mark, ‘The Tempest Review at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon – “Gimmicky, but Simon Russell Beale Soars”’, The Stage, 17 November 2016.Google Scholar
Slater, Ann Pasternak, ‘Hypallage, Barley-Break, and The Changeling’, The Review of English Studies n.s., 34.136 (1983), 429–40.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R., ‘Eyeing and Wording in Cymbeline’, in Gallagher, Lowell and Raman, Shankar (eds.), Knowing Shakespeare: Senses, Embodiment and Cognition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 50–64.Google Scholar
Sofer, Andrew, Dark Matter: Invisibility in Drama, Theater and Performance (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Solga, Kim, ‘Playing The Changeling Architecturally’, in Bennett, Susan and Polito, Mary (eds.), Performing in Environments: Site-Specificity in Medieval and Early Modern English Drama (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 56–76.Google Scholar
Solga, Kim, Theory for Theatre Studies: Space (London: Methuen, 2019).Google Scholar
Solga, Kim, Violence against Women in Early Modern Performance: In/Visible Acts (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany, ‘Taking Part: Actors and Audience on the Stage at Blackfriars’, in Menzer, Paul (ed.), Inside Shakespeare: Essays on the Blackfriars Stage (Selinsgrove, PN: Susquehanna University Press, 2006), pp. 25–53.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany, ‘“This Wide and Universal Theatre”: The Theatre as Prop in Shakespeare's Metadrama’, in Karim-Cooper, Farah and Stern, Tiffany (eds.), Shakespeare’s Theatres and the Effects of Performance (London: Bloomsbury, 2013), pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany, Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Stone, Alison, ‘Not Making a Movie: The Livecasting of Shakespeare Stage Productions by the Royal National Theatre and the Royal Shakespeare Company’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 34.4 (2016), 627–43.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Erin, ‘The Audience Is Present: Aliveness, Social Media, and the Theatre Broadcast Experience’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 59–75.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Erin, ‘“The Forms of Things Unknown”: Shakespeare and the Rise of the Live Broadcast’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 35.4 (2017), 627–62.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Erin, ‘Richard II, Royal Shakespeare Company (RST)’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 32.2 (2014), 272–5.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Erin, ‘Shakespeare, Social Media, and the Digital Public Sphere: Such Tweet Sorrow and A Midsummer Night's Dreaming’, Shakespeare, 14.1 (2018), 64–79.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Erin, ‘Stage, Space, and Celebrity: Coriolanus at the Donmar’, Digital Shakespeare blog, 4 April 2014 (available at https://digitalshakespeares.wordpress.com/2014/04/04/stage-screen-and-celebrity-coriolanus-at-the-donmar/comment-page-1/).Google Scholar
Sullivan, Erin, Shakespeare and Digital Performance in Practice (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Svendsen, Zoë, ‘Dramaturg Zoë Svendsen Discusses the Young Vic Production of The Changeling’, Theatrevoice, 13 December 2012 (available at www.theatrevoice.com/audio/dramaturg-zoe-svendsen-discusses-the-young-vic-production-of-the-changeling/, last accessed 25 March 2019).Google Scholar
Svendsen, Zoë, ‘Zoë Svendsen on the Dramaturge’s Role at the Heart of the Action’, Times Higher Education, 29 August 2013.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul, ‘The Tempest, Royal Shakespeare Theatre’, The Independent, 18 November 2016.Google Scholar
Taylor, Diana, The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Taylor, Millie, ‘Listening to Theatre Music at the RSC – The Tempest (2016)’, unpublished paper, TaPRA, University of Exeter, 6 September 2019.Google Scholar
Taymor, Julie and Schechner, Richard, ‘Julie Taymor: From Jacques Lecoq to The Lion King’, TDR: The Drama Review, 43.3 (1999), 36–55.Google Scholar
Teague, Frances, ‘The Phoenix and the Cockpit-in-Court’, in Dutton, Richard (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theatre (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 240–59.Google Scholar
Tosh, Will, Playing Indoors: Staging Early Modern Drama in the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse (London: Bloomsbury, 2017).Google Scholar
Tribble, Evelyn B., Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar
Trueman, Matt, ‘Pippa Nixon: “Actresses can now have a Shakespeare canon of their own”’, The Stage, 26 February 2016.Google Scholar
Turner, Cathy and Behrndt, Synne K., Dramaturgy and Performance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).Google Scholar
Tynan, Kenneth, ‘The Triumph of Stratford’s Lear’, The Observer, 11 November 1962.Google Scholar
Universities UK International, ‘International Facts and Figures’, Higher Education, May 2017.Google Scholar
Vallelly, Neil, ‘Being-in-Light at the Early Modern and Reconstructed Theatres’ (PhD thesis, University of Otago, 2015).Google Scholar
Van Es, Bart, ‘Reviving the Legacy of Indoor Performance’, in Gurr, Andrew and Karim-Cooper, Farah (eds.), Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 237–51.Google Scholar
Van Hove, Ivo, ‘Roman Tragedies: “The Times They Are A-changin’ (Bob Dylan)”’, in Bennett, Susan and Massai, Sonia (eds.), Ivo van Hove: From Shakespeare to David Bowie (London: Methuen, 2018), pp. 56–9.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Virginia Mason, The Tempest: A Critical Reader (London: Bloomsbury, 2015).Google Scholar
Walker, Jonathan, Site Unscene: The Offstage in English Renaissance Drama (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Walker, Saint John, ‘A Quick Walk through “Uncanny Valley”’, in Oddey, Alison and White, Christine (eds.), Modes of Spectating (Bristol: Intellect, 2009), pp. 29–40.Google Scholar
Ward, Peter, Studio and Outside Broadcast Camera Work: A Guide to Multi-Camera Work Production, 2nd edition (Oxford: Focal Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Wardle, Janice, ‘“Outside Broadcast”: Looking Backwards and Forwards, Live Theatre in the Cinema – NT Live and RSC Live’, Adaptation, 7.2 (2014), 134–53.Google Scholar
Warren, Roger, Staging Shakespeare’s Late Plays (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Way, Geoffrey, ‘Peeking behind the Digital Curtains: Shakespearean Performance Institutions, Social Media, and Access’, Borrowers and Lenders, 10.1 (2016), 1–23.Google Scholar
Way, Geoffrey, ‘Together, Apart: Liveness, Eventness, and Streaming Shakespearean Performance’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 35.3 (2017), 389–406.Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert, Author’s Pen and Actor’s Voice: Playing and Writing in Shakespeare’s Theatre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert, Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater, trans. Robert Schwartz (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
White, Martin, The Chamber of Demonstrations: Reconstructing the Jacobean Indoor Playhouse (Bristol: Ignition Films, 2009), an interactive DVD presented as a book.Google Scholar
Wiles, David, A Short History of Western Performance Space (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Williams, Nora Jean, ‘Between Performances, Text, and Editions: The Changeling’ (PhD Thesis, University of Exeter, 2016).Google Scholar
Williams, Nora, ‘“Cannot I Keep That Secret?”: Editing and Performing Asides in The Changeling’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 34.1 (2016), 29–45.Google Scholar
Williams, Nora J., ‘The Changeling Presented by Shakespeare’s Globe at the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse, London, January 2015’, Early Modern Literary Studies, 19.2 (2017), 1–14.Google Scholar
Woods, Penelope, ‘The Audience of the Indoor Theatre’, in Gurr, Andrew and Karim-Cooper, Farah (eds.), Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 152–67.Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B., ‘Interactive, Immersive and Original Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 35.3 (2017), 407–24.Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B., Shakespeare and the Authority of Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B., Shakespeare and the Force of Modern Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B., Shakespeare Performance Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Wyver, John, ‘“All the Trimmings?”: The Transfer of Theatre to Television in Adaptations of Shakespeare Stagings’, Adaptation, 7.2 (2014), 104–20.Google Scholar
Wyver, John, ‘Creating RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon’, draft chapter, November 2018, for Judith Buchanan and John Wyver, Being There: Shakespeare and Live Broadcast Theatre (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Wyver, John, ‘Screening the RSC Stage: The 2014 Live from Stratford-upon-Avon Cinema Broadcasts’, Shakespeare, 11.3 (2015), 286–302.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj, The Parallax View (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Pascale Aebischer, University of Exeter
  • Book: Shakespeare, Spectatorship and the Technologies of Performance
  • Online publication: 10 April 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108339001.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Pascale Aebischer, University of Exeter
  • Book: Shakespeare, Spectatorship and the Technologies of Performance
  • Online publication: 10 April 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108339001.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Pascale Aebischer, University of Exeter
  • Book: Shakespeare, Spectatorship and the Technologies of Performance
  • Online publication: 10 April 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108339001.012
Available formats
×