Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:06:26.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Performance, game, and representation in Richard III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Robert Weimann
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Douglas Bruster
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

To move from a late moral play to Shakespeare's first tetralogy is to encounter a puzzling hiatus. This hiatus divides the moral interludes and related dramatic medleys of the 1560s and 1570s from the new and startling impetus coming from Kyd and Marlowe in the second half of the 1580s. Never sufficiently accounted for, the space between these types of plays, and between their dates of composition, bears significantly on the emergent Elizabethan relations of page and stage. Grappling with the terra incognita of these years, theatre historians, particularly in the wake of Janet Loengard's work on the Red Lion theatre, have encountered a marked “disparity between theatrical activity and printed texts,” where the extremely small number of extant texts sits uneasily with widespread flourishing of performance practices. As we know, regular stagings of amphitheatrical shows for large audiences occurred not only after the opening of the Theatre (1576) and the Curtain (1577) but even a decade earlier, with the setting up of the Red Lion (1567). Recent work in theatre history has given us a cultural landscape that, even when tantalizingly obscured, prompts new and pertinent questions.

Up to a certain time, the history of dramatic literature (the work of such authors as, for example, Nicholas Udall, Richard Edwards, George Whetstone, and George Gascoigne) was largely discontinuous with itinerant and nonacademic shows. These shows clearly proliferated prior to the Shakespearean stage.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare and the Power of Performance
Stage and Page in the Elizabethan Theatre
, pp. 42 - 56
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astington, John H., in “The London Stage in the 1580s,” The Elizabethan Theatre 11 (1990), 1–18Google Scholar
Ingram, William, The Business of Playing: The Beginnings of the Adult Professional Theater in Elizabethan London (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992), 241Google Scholar
Bradley, David, From Text to Performance in the Elizabethan Theatre: Preparing the Play for the Stage (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 58Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert's Drama und Wirklichkeit in der Shakespearezeit (Halle: Niemeyer, 1958), 147–59Google Scholar
Wiles, David, Shakespeare's Clown: Actor and Text in the Elizabethan Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius, The Imaginary Institution of Society, trans. Blamey, Kathleen (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998), 238Google Scholar
Lunney, Ruth, Marlowe and the Popular Tradition: Innovation in the English Drama before 1595 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002), 102–4, 183–4Google Scholar
Alter, Jean, A Sociosemiotic Theory of Theatre (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990), 31–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, Michael and Jones, Robin F., eds., Performing Texts [Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988], 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Andrew and Sedgwick, Eve K. refer to this function as “the non-reference of the performative,” in Parker, and Sedgwick, , eds., “Introduction,” Performativity and Performance (New York: Routledge, 1995), 3Google Scholar
Evans, Bertrand's description of “discrepant awareness” in Shakespeare's Comedies (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960), esp. 14, 34, 188–208Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert, Author's Pen and Actor's Voice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), esp. 137–9, 223–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruster, Douglas and Weimann, Robert, Prologues to Shakespeare's Theatre: Performance and Liminality in Early Modern Drama (London and New York: Routledge, 2004), 82, 172 n13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bristol, Michael D., Carnival and Theater: Plebeian Culture and the Structure of Authority in Renaissance England (New York: Methuen, 1985), 88–90Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard's essay, “‘A Mingled Yarn’: Shakespeare and the Cloth Workers,” Literature and History 12 (1986), 164–80Google Scholar
Besnault, Marie-Hélène and Bitot, Michel, “Historical Legacy and Fiction: The Poetical Reinvention of King Richard III” in Hattaway, Michael, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's History Plays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 106–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, Pauline, “Richard III, personnage-Vice protéiforme,” in Guinle, Francis and Ramel, Jacques, eds., William Shakespeare, Richard III: Nouvelles perspectives critiques (Montpellier: Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur la Renaissance Anglaise, Université Paul-Valéry–Montpellier III, 2000), 133–59Google Scholar
Debax, Jean-Paul, “‘The formal vice, iniquity’: Traditions dramatiques dans Richard III,” in Suhamy, Henri, ed., Richard III (Paris: Ellipses, 1999), 41–51Google Scholar
Duckles, Rory, “Richard III: The Transformation of Antecedents,” Johannesburg Shakespeare Quarterly 1.1 (1993), 6–18Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas, “The Agency of Shakespearean Quotation,” ch. 3 in his Quoting Shakespeare: Form and Culture in Early Modern Drama (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000), 88–116Google Scholar
Charnes, Linda, Notorious Identity: Materializing the Subject in Shakespeare (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 20–69Google Scholar
Bevington, David's foundational study, From “Mankind” to Marlowe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skura, Meredith Anne, Shakespeare the Actor and the Purpose of Playing (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), 46–9Google Scholar
Wilcock, Mike, Hamlet: The Shakespearean Director (Dublin: Carysfort, 2002)Google Scholar
Helphinstine, Fran, “Peter Quince as Director,” Shakespeare 3.2 (Georgetown University, 1999), 14Google Scholar
Lyons, Bridget Gellert, “‘Kings Games’: Stage Imagery and Political Symbolism in Richard III,” Criticism 20 (1978), 17–30Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich, Literary Language and Its Public in Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages, trans. Manheim, Ralph (1958; New York: Pantheon Books, 1965), 25–81Google Scholar
Barber, C. L., “The Saturnalian Pattern in Shakespeare's Comedy,” The Sewanee Review 59 (1951), 593–611Google Scholar
Bruster, and Weimann, , Prologues to Shakespeare's Theatre, 139–42
Marche, Stephen, “Mocking Dead Bones: Historical Memory and the Theater of the Dead in Richard III,” Comparative Drama 37.1 (2003), 37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, James, Rival Playwrights: Marlowe, Jonson, Shakespeare (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie, “Marlovian Vision/Shakespearean Revision,” Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 22 (1979), 3–9Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel, Reading Holinshed's “Chronicles” (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Kendall, Ritchie D., The Drama of Dissent: The Radical Poetics of Nonconformity, 1380–1590 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1985), 127Google Scholar
Chambers, E. K., The Elizabethan Stage, 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1923), 4:267Google Scholar
Targoff, Ramie, Common Prayer: The Language of Religious Devotion in Early Modern England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×