Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T19:10:04.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The Laws of Measure for Measure

from Part II - Audience Judgment: Deliberation in the Theater

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Paul Yachnin
Affiliation:
McGill University
Kevin Curran
Affiliation:
University of Lausanne
Get access

Summary

Near the end of Measure for Measure, a woman kneels before a judge and pleads for the life of the man who has dishonored her and who (she believes) has had her brother beheaded. She performs this extraordinary action for a number of reasons – to give the condemned man another chance to be better than he has been, to assure that the condemned man's new wife will not be made a new widow, and, finally, to honor what she evidently believes is the cause of justice.

In the moments that follow and that close the play, the urgency, complexity, and gravity of the woman's plea are washed away by a flood of what are supposed to pass as acts of mercy, but which are so indiscriminate as to be empty of moral weight altogether. Then, without a scintilla of warning, the judge, who is scattering his acts of mercy wildly among almost everyone on the stage, turns and asks the woman to marry him. It is as if a severe stone statue facing us were suddenly revealed to be a helium-filled balloon. The action and meaning of the play float crazily away.

Why does the play swing from the seriousness of Isabella's plea to the weirdly profligate forgivings that Vincentio showers on all? To answer this question, we will have to consider how the play develops a critical representation of three kinds of law, each one having its own special relationship with the ideal of justice. At the end, we will come back to Isabella. To a considerable degree, Isabella is us – the figure of how the play summons its audiences and readers to the labor of judgment, situates our judging apart from the machinations of the powerful, characterizes theater-born judging as a form of serious play (after all, Isabella has not been raped by Angelo, her brother has not been killed), and reveals the stakes of judgment for the judges themselves. But first, let us look again at the play's ending.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×