Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:32:00.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - ‘Wild Boys’: the aesthetic of the synthetic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Get access

Summary

The after-effects of punk rock were characterised by a multiplicity of overlapping developments, by different musical concepts and by a variety of stylistic forms of expression. The punk-inspired opening up of the music business to the activities of small independent firms, local promoters and alternative directions in music, resulted in a creative explosion which pushed the succession of styles, fashions and trends to breakneck speed. The strands of pop music development which had previously been carefully kept separate now ran together in the most remarkable crossovers to make a mixture of disparate musical forms. Disco music, funk and reggae found themselves in an unconventional synthesis with punk, hard rock and heavy metal, as in the punk-funk fusion of Bush Tetras, in the heavy metal-funk of Level 42 or in the symbiosis of rock and reggae produced by The Clash and a series of British punk bands. Dub, rap and the sound creations of overstyled electronic dandies, labelled the New Romantics, provided the background for a wave of dance crazes in the discotheques. Peter Tosh, Big Youth and Inner Circle were offering reggae in a pop-influenced disco mix. Rockabilly, ska, soul, rhythm & blues, rock‘n’roll and the unmistakable Liverpool Merseybeat guitar sound of the early sixties were experiencing a revival which broadened out into a discriminating reappraisal of the whole musical heritage of rock history.

Post punk, with groups like PIL, Pop Group or Gang of Four, as well as the American No Wave bands like DNA or Teenage Jesus, introduced itself with a mixture of aggressive noise, musical minimalism and stereotyped repetition with clear references to the ‘minimalist music’ of the classical avant-garde in Philip Glass, Terry Riley and Steve Reich.

Type
Chapter
Information
Rock Music
Culture, Aesthetics and Sociology
, pp. 154 - 173
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×