Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:25:36.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

S. M. Haslam
S. M. Haslam
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Riverscape and the River , pp. 367 - 393
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalen, F. H. R. (1978). Man and the Landscape in Ireland. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
∗Abela, G. F. (1647). Della Descrtione di Malta, Malta.Google Scholar
Allison, R. J. & Thomas, D. S. G. (1993). The sensitivity of landscapes. In Landscape Sensitivity, ed. Thomas, D. S. A. & Allison, R. J.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
∗Alumäe, H., Palang, H. & Printsmann, A. (2001). Cultural and historical values in landscape planning. In Development of European Landscapes, ed. Mander, Ü, Rintsmann, A. & Palang,, H. vol. 1, University of Tartu, pp. 183–8.Google Scholar
Alumäe, H., Printsmann, A. & Palang, H. (2003). Cultural and historic values in landscape planning. In Landscape Interfaces, ed. Palang, H. & Fry., G.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Andressen, T. & Curado, M. J. (2001). The shaping of the future of a cultural landscape. In Development of European Landscapes, ed. Mander, Ü, Rintsmann, A. & Palang, H., vol. 1, University of Tartu, pp. 313–16.Google Scholar
Andressen, T. & Curado, M. J. (2003). Shaping the future of a cultural landscape. The Douro valley wine region. In Landscape Interfaces, ed. Palang, H. & Fry, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 109–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Andrew, J. & Kinsman, D. (1990). Gravel Pit Restoration for Wildlife. Sandy, Bedfordshire: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.Google Scholar
Andrews, J. H. (1988). The development of wildlife conservation on rivers. Conservation Review, 2, 78–80. Sandy, Bedfordshire: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.Google Scholar
,Anon. (1991). Nature conservation and pollution from farm wastes. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council.
,Anon. (1994). Biodiversity. London: The UK Action Plan. HMSO.Google Scholar
,Anon. (2000). Hedgerows of England. Cheltenham: The Countryside Agency.Google Scholar
Antrap, M. (1987). Invisible connectivity in rural landscapes. International Association for Landscape Ecology (IALE), pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
Antrap, M. (1988). Invisible connectivity in rural landscapes. In Conductivity in Landscape Ecology, ed. Schreiber, K. F., pp. 57–62.
Arheimer, B. & Andersson, L. (2001). Landscape wetness and nitrogen transport 1885–94. In Development of European Landscapes, ed. Mander, Ü, Rintsmann, A. & Palang, H., vol. 1, University of Tartu, Tartu.Google Scholar
∗Association Française de Normalisation (2003). NF T90–395. Determination de l'indice biologique macrophytique en rivière. AFNOR.
∗Athie, D. & Cerri, C. C., eds. (1987). The Use of Macrophytes in Water Pollution Control. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Aubrecht, G., Dick, G. & Prentice, C. (1994). Monitoring of ecological change in wetlands of middle Europe. Stapfia, 31.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. G., José, P. V. & Sherwood, B. R. (1998). United Kingdom Floodplains. Otley: Westbury.Google Scholar
∗Baker, A. R. H. (1992a). Collective consciousness and the local landscape. In Ideology and Landscape in Historical Perspective, ed. Baker, A. R. H. & Biger, G.. Cambridge: University Press, pp. 255–88.Google Scholar
Baker, A. R. H. (1992b). Introduction. In Ideology and Landscape in Historical Perspective, ed. Baker, A. R. H. & Biger, G.. Cambridge: University Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
∗Baker, A. R. H. & Biger, G., eds. (1992). Ideology and Landscape in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, C. D., Casey, H., Castellano, E. R., et al. (1973). The chalk stream ecosystem, Bere Stream, Bere Heath. International Biological Progamme – UNESCO Production–Freshwaters sectional Symposium on Synthesis of P-F results, Report 40.
∗Bakkestuen, V., Dramstad, W. D. & Fjellstad, W. J. (2001). Landscape changes in multifunctional landscapes change multiple function. In Development of European Landscapes, ed. Mander, Ü, Rintsmann, A. & Palang, H.. vol. 1, University of Tartu, pp. 378–82.Google Scholar
∗Barr, C. & Petit, S. eds. (2001). Hedgerows of the World. Proceedings of the 10th annual IALE (UK) conference. Chapter: International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK.Google Scholar
Barr, C. J., Birtt, C. P. & Sparks, T. H. (1995). Hedgerow management and wildlife. Grange-over-Sands: ADAS and Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.Google Scholar
Barrett, P. R. F., Greaves, M. P., Murphy, K. J.et al., eds. (1990). European Weed Research Society, 8th International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds Sweden, 1990. EWRS, Wageningen.Google Scholar
∗Baudry, J. & Bunce, R. G. H. (2001). An overview of the landscape ecology of hedgerows. In Hedgerows of the World,. ed. Barr, C. & Petit, S.. International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Branch IALE (UK), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
∗Baudry, J. & Bunel, F. (2001). Agricultural landscape dynamics. In Species dispersal and land use processes. Proceedings of the 6th annual conference of IALE (UK,). ed. Cooper, A. & Power, J.. International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Branch, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
Baudry, J. & Merriam, H. G. (1988). Connectivity and connectedness: functional versus structural patterns in landscape. In Conductivity in Landscape Ecology, ed. Schreiber, K. F., pp. 23–8.Google Scholar
Beardall, C. H. (1992). Water for Wildlife. A review of water resource management issues in the Anglian region, Anglian Region Wildlife Trusts.Google Scholar
∗Bell, S. (1999). Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process. London: Span.Google Scholar
∗Bellamy, P. E., Brown, N. J., Enoksson, B. et al. (1997). The role of landscape structure and dispersal in limiting nuthatch distribution. In Species dispersal and land use processes. Proceedings of the 6th annual conference of IALE (UK), ed. Cooper, A. & Power, J.. International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Branch, pp. 151–8.Google Scholar
Ben-Artzi, Y. (1993). Religious ideology and landscape formation. In Landscape Sensitivity, ed. Thomas, D. S. A. & Allison, R. J.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
Bernez, I., Haniel, H., Haury, J. & Ferreira, M. T. (2004). Combined effects of environmental factors and regulation on macrophyte vegetation along three rivers in Western France. River Research and Applications, 20, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bill, H. C., Peschled, P., Reich, M. & Plachter, H. (1999). Experiments and observations on seed dispersal by running water in an Alpine floodplain. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, 65, 13–28.Google Scholar
Blasi, C., Carranza, M. L.Marzio, Di P. & Frondini, R. (1998). Landscape ecology and biodiversity for defining a sustainable management model. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 7, 175–82.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. (1993). The sensitivity of Downland arable land to erosion by water. In Landscape Sensitivity, ed. Thomas, D. S. A. & Allison, R. J.Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 211–28.Google Scholar
∗Boatman, N. D., Clay, D. V., Goodman, A.et al., eds. (2000). Vegetation management in changing landscapes. Aspects of Applied Biology, 58.Google Scholar
∗Boeye, D. (1992). Hydrologie, hydrochemie en ecologie van een grundwater afhankelijk veen. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Bold, R. (2002). The wonderful water world of wood. FBA News, 20, 10–11.Google Scholar
Bollens, U. & Ramseier, D. (2001). Shifts in abundance of fen-meadow species along a nutrient gradient in a field experiment. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, 67, 57–72.Google Scholar
Bolton, P. & Dawson, F. H. (1992). The use of a check-list in assessing possible environmental impacts in planning watercourse improvements. Final Proceedings of the International Symposium on Effects of Watercourse Improvements. 10–12 September 1991, Wpion, Namur, Belgium, pp. 29–42.Google Scholar
Boon, P. J. (1991). The role of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) in the conservation of British rivers. Freshwater Forum, 1(2), 95–108.Google Scholar
Boon, P. J. & Lee, A. (2005). Falling through the cracks: are European directives and international conventions the panacea for freshwater nature conservation?Freshwater Forum, 24, 24–37.Google Scholar
Boon, P. J. & Raven, P. J. (1948). The application of classification and assessment methods to river management in the UK. Aquatic Conservation, 8(4), special issue.Google Scholar
Boon, P. J., Calow, P. & Petts, G. E., eds. (1991). River Conservation and Management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
∗Boon, P. J., Calow, P. & Petts, G. E., eds. (1992). River Conservation and Management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
∗Boothby, J., ed. (1997a). British pond landscapes. Proceedings of the UK Conference of the PondLife Project, 1997. John Moores University, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Boothby, J. (1997b). Ponds and pondscape conservation strategy. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Pond Life Project. John Moores University, Liverpool.Google Scholar
∗Boothby, J. (1998a). Pond and pond landscapes of Europe. Proceedings of the International Conference of the PondLife Project. John Moores University, Liverpool.Google Scholar
∗Boothby, J. (1998b). Ponds, a search for significance. In (1998a). Ponds and Pond Landscapes of Europe. PondLife Project, ed. Boothby, J., John Moores University, Liverpool, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
∗Boothby, J. (2006). Stability in pond networks. In Water and the landscape. Proceedings of the 19th annual IALE (UK) conference, ed. Davies, B. & Thompson, S., International Association for Landscape Ecology, UK Branch, pp. 93–101.Google Scholar
Boothby, J., Guest, J. P. & Bentley, D. (2001). A landscape worth saving. Final report of the pond biodiversity survey of north west England. PondLife Project, John Moores University, Liverpool.Google Scholar
∗Borg., J. (1927). Descriptive Flora of the Maltese Islands. Government Press, Malta.Google Scholar
Borman, F. H. & Likens, G. E. (1979). Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornette, G. & Amoros, C. & Collilieux, G. (1994). Role of seepage supply in aquatic vegetation dynamics in former river channels: prediction testing using a hydroelectric construction. Environmental Management, 18, 223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornette, G., & Amoros, C. (1991). Aquatic vegetation and hydrology of a braided river floodplain. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Botaman, N. D., Clay, D. V., Goodman, A.et al., eds. (2000).
Bowen, H. G. (1961). Ancient Fields. British Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Bowen-Jones, H.Dewdney, H. C. & Fisher, W. B. (1961). Malta: background for development. Department of Geography, University of Durham.Google Scholar
Breugnot, E., Dutartre, A., Laplace-Tryture, C. & Haury, J. (2004). Variabilité des peuplements de macrophytes en grands cours d'eau – Premiers résultats sur l'hydrosystème Adour-Garonne. Ingénieries, 37, 37–50.Google Scholar
∗Brewer, E. C. (1881). Dictionary of Phrase and Fable. 12th edn. London: Cassells & Co.Google Scholar
Brookes, A., Gregory, K. J. & Dawson, F. H. (1983). An assessment of river channelization in England and Wales. Science of the Total Environment, 27, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, A. (1988). Channelized Rivers. Perspective for Environmental Management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brookes, A. & Shields, F. D., eds. (1996). River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brooks, S. (2004). The restoration of Scottish raised bogs (2001–2003). Successful conclusion of latest peatland LIFE Nature Project. IMCG Newsletter, p. 23.Google Scholar
Brown, A. G.Harper, D. & Peterken, G. F. (1997b). European floodplain forests: structure, functioning and management. Floodplain Forests (special issue), pp. 169–78.Google Scholar
Brown, P. M. J. & Doberski, J. (2005). Ground beetle succession and the conservation status of High Fen (Kingfisher Bridge). Nature in Cambridgeshire, 47, 23–30.Google Scholar
Brunsden, D. (1993). In Landscape Sensitivity, ed. ∗Thomas, D. S. G. & Allison, R. J.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Buhagiar, K. (2003). L-Ghar ta' Baldu water gallery. The Sunday Times of Malta, 44–5.Google Scholar
∗Buhagiar, K. (2003). Personal communication.
∗Bunyan, J. (1682). The Pilgrim's Progress. London: Jarrold (reprinted).Google Scholar
Burt, T. P. & Haycock, N. E. (1991). Farming and nitrate pollution. Geography, 76, 60–3.Google Scholar
∗Burt, T. P. & Haycock, N. E. (1993). Catchment sensitivity to nitrate leaching: land use controls. In Landscape Sensitivity, ed. Thomas, D. S. G. & Allison, R. J.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 229–40.Google Scholar
Burt, T. P., Heathwaite, A. L. & Trudgill, S. T. (1943). Catchment sensitivity to land use controls. In Landscape Sensitivity, ed. Thomas, D. S. A. & Allison, R. J.Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 229–40.Google Scholar
∗Butcher, R. W. (1927). A preliminary account of the vegetation of the river Itchen. Journal of Ecology, 15, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Butcher, R. W. (1933). Studies on the ecology of rivers. I. On the distribution of macrophytic vegetation in the rivers of Britain. Journal of Ecology, 21, 58–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, R. W., Longwell, J. & Pentelow, F. T. K. (1951). A biological investigation of the River Lark and the effect of beet sugar pollution. Fishery Investigations Land, 3.
Caffrey, J. M. (1993a). Aquatic plant management in relation to Irish recreational fisheries development. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 31, 162–8.Google Scholar
Caffrey, J. M. (1993b). Plant management as an integrated part of Ireland's aquatic resources. Hydroecologie appliqué, 5, 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffrey, J. M. & Beglin, T. (1996). Bankside stabilisation through reed transplantation in a newly constructed Irish canal habitat. Hydrobiologia, 340, 349–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffrey, J. M., Barrett, P. R. F., Murphy, K. J. & Wade, P. M. (1996). Management and Ecology of Freshwater Plants. Dordrecht: Klewer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Calow, P. (1998). Handbook of Environmental Risk Assessment and Management. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Canadian Heritage Rivers System (N. Coomber, et al.) (2001). A cultural framework for the national values of Canadian heritage rivers. Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Ottawa.
∗Carbiener, R.Trémolières, M., Mercier, J. L. & Ortscheit, A. (1990). Aquatic macrophyte communities as bioindicators of eutrophication in calcareous oligotrophic stream water (Upper Rhine plain, Alsace). Vegetatio, 86, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M. (2005). Identifying and prioritising opportunities to improve fish populations in the rivers of London. River Restoration Centre, Silsoe, Bedfordshire, 25.Google Scholar
∗Cassar, P. (1965). Medical History of Malta. Wellcome Historical Medical Library, Publ. New Series 6, London.Google Scholar
Claassen, T. H. L. (1997). Ecological water quality objectives in the Netherlands, especially in the province of Friesland. European Water Pollution Control, 7, 36–95.Google Scholar
Clare, T. (1996). Archaeology, conservation and the late twentieth century village landscape. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 1, 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, T. (2000). An assessment of the potential of the TWINSPAN program of multivariate analysis to contribute to the classification and management of village landscape, with reference to historical features. Landscape Research, 25, 117–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Clare, T. & Howard, D., eds. (2000). Quantitative approaches to landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 2000 Animal IALE (UK) Conference. International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Branch.Google Scholar
∗Clarke, J. A. (1854–5). On trunk drainage. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society, 15 (1st series), 1–73.Google Scholar
∗Cobham Resource Consultants (1992). The Tamar Valley Landscape. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham.
Collins, A. (2000). The effect of willow root architecture on riverbank stability. The Robson Meeting, Abstracts, p. 8.Google Scholar
∗Commission Européen neu de Normalisation (2003). CEN/TC 230 N 0429 – EN 14184 Water quality. Guidance standard for the surveying of aquatic macrophytes in running water. Guide pour l'étude des macrophytes aquatiques dans les cours d'eau. AFNOR.
∗Commission of the European Union (1992). The CORINE Biotype Project, Brussels. Chadwick, O. (1894) Water Supply of Malta, Malta: Government Printing Press.
∗Cook, H. & Williamson, T. (1999). Water Management in the English Landscape. Edinburgh: University Press.Google Scholar
∗Cooper, P. F. & Findlater, P. C., eds. (1990). Constructed Wetlands in Water Pollution Control. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
∗Cooper, A. & Power, J. (1997). Species dispersal and land use processes. Proceedings of the 6th annual conference of IALE (UK). International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Branch.Google Scholar
Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment.
Council Directive 92/93/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.
Countryside Agency (2000). Hedgerows of England. Wetherby: Countryside Agency.
∗Countryside Commission (1991a). Assessment and conservation of landscape character, Cheltenham.
∗Countryside Commission (1991b). The Warwickshire Landscapes Project Approach, Cheltenham.
∗Countryside Commission (1993). Central Lincolnshire Vale. English Nature, 44, Cheltenham.
∗Countryside Commission (1994). The Isle of Wight Landscape. Cheltenham: Nicholas Pearson Associates Ltd.
∗Countryside Commission (1995a). Lincolnshire coast and marshes. English Nature, 42, Cheltenham.
∗Countryside Commission (1995b). The Cannock Chase Landscape. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham.
Countryside Focus (2004). Countryside Quality Counts. Cheltenham: Countryside Agency.
Cox, M., Straken, U. & Taylor, D., eds. (1996). Wetlands: archaeology and nature conservation. English Nature. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Daniel, H., Bernez, I. & Haury, J. (2002). Relations entre la morphologie des macrophytes et les caractéristiques physiques des habitats en rivière. In Gestion des Plantes Aquatiques. Proceedings of the 11th European Weed Research Society International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, ed. Dutartre, A. & Montel, M. H. N., September 2–6. Moliets et Maâ, France, pp. 115–18.Google Scholar
Darby, H. C. (1968). The Drainage of the Fens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
∗Darby, H. C. (1971). The Domesday Geography of Eastern England. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
∗Darby, H. C. (1983). The Changing Fenland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, B. & Thompson, S. eds. (2006). Water and the landscape. Proceedings of the 19th annual IALE (UK) conference. International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Chapter.Google Scholar
∗Davies, B. R., Biggs, J. & Williams, P. (2006). Towards achieving sustainability for the biodiversity of aquatic habitats in UK agricultural landscapes. In Water and the landscape. Proceedings of the 19th annual IALE (UK) conference, ed. Davies, B., & Thompson, S., International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Chapter, pp. 146–53.Google Scholar
Dawson, F. H. (1978). The seasonal effects of aquatic plant growth on the flow of water in a stream. Proceedings of the 5th European Weed Research Council Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, pp. 71–8.Google Scholar
∗Dawson, F. H. (1980). The flowering of Ranunculus penicillatus var. calcareus in the River Piddle, Dorset. Aquatic Botany, 9, 145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, F. H. (1981). The downstream transport of fine material and organic balance for a section of a small chalk stream in southern England. Journal of Ecology, 69, 367–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, F. H. (1988). Water flow and the vegetation of running waters. In Handbook of Vegetation Sciences, series 15: Vegetation of Inland Waters, ed. Symoens, J. J.. The Hague: Junk, pp. 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Dawson, F. H. (1994). The spread of Crassula helmsii (Kirk) Cockayne in Britain. In Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants, ed. Waal, L. C., Child, L. E., Wade, P. M. & Brock, J. H.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Dawson, F. H. & Newman, J. R. (1998). Decline of Ranunculus in British rivers: true or false? Proceedings of the 10th European Weed Research Society International Symposium of Aquatic Weeds, Lisbon, pp. 95–8.Google Scholar
Dawson, F. H. & Szoszkiewicz, K. (1998). Ecological factors and the associations of aquatic vegetation in the British rivers. Proceedings of the 10th European Weed Research Society International Symposium of Aquatic Weeds, Lisbon. pp. 179–82.Google Scholar
Dawson, F. H., Castellano, E. & Ladle, M. (1978). The concept of species succession in relation to river vegetation and management. Verhandlung international Vereinung theoretische angewandte Limnologie, 20, 1451–56.Google Scholar
Dawson, F. H., Clinton, E. M. F. & Ladle, M. (1991). Invertebrates on cut-weed removed during a weed-cut operation along an English river, the River Frome, Dorset. Aquaculture & Fisheries Management, 22, 113–21.Google Scholar
Dawson, F. H., Raven, P. J. & Holmes, N. T. H. (1998). The distribution of aquatic plants by morphological group for rivers in the UK. Proceedings of the 10th European Weed Research Society International Symposium of Aquatic Weeds,Lisbon, pp. 183–6.Google Scholar
Lange, L. (1975). Gibbosity in the complex Lemna gibba/minor: literature survey and ecological aspects. Veröffrungun des Geobotanisches Institut, Zurich, 49, 127–44.Google Scholar
Waal, L. C., Child, L. E., Wade, P. M. & Brock, J. H. eds. (1994). Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Décamps, H. & D'Camps, O. (2002). Mediterranean riparian woodlands, an example of a successful study of landscape ecological research for planning. IALE Bulletin, 20, 1–2.Google Scholar
∗Defoe, D. (1724–7). A Tour through the Whole Island of Great Britain. London (1974): Everyman, J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
den Hartez, C. (1982). Architecture of macrophyte-dominated aquatic communities. In Studies on Aquatic Vascular Plants, ed. Symvens, J. J., Hooper, S. S. & Compère, P., Royal Botanical Society of Belgium, Brussels, pp. 222–39.Google Scholar
Denecke, D. (1992). Ideology in the planned order upon the land. In Ideology and Landscape in Historical Perspective, ed. Baker, A. R. H., & Biger, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 303–29.Google Scholar
∗Dennis, P., Beaton, K., Langan, S. & Stockan, J. P. (2006). Accumulated landscape ecological effects of riparian management in river catchments used for agriculture. Water and the landscape. Proceedings of the 19th annual IALE (UK) conference, ed. Davies, B., & Thompson, S., International Association for Landscape Ecology, UK Chapter, pp. 155–62.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2000). Our Countryside: The Future. Rural White Paper. London: HMSO.
Dick, Th., Melman, C. P. & van Strien, A. J. (1993). Ditchbanks as a conservation focus in intensively farmed exploited peat farmland. In Landscape Ecology of Stressed Environments, ed. Vos, C. C. & Opdam, P.. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 122–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Dickens, C. (1868). Martin Chuzzlewit. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Dobson, M., Cariss, H. & Murray, B. (1997). Effects of a flash flood on channel morphology and some insects of a small stony stream in the Peak District, Derbyshire. Freshwater Forum, 9, 2–13.Google Scholar
Dokulil, M. & Janauer, G. A. (2000). Alternative stable states of macrophytes versus phytoplankton in two interconnected impoundments of the New Danube (Vienna, Austria). Archivum Hydrobiologia (Supplement, Large Rivers), 12/1, 75–83.Google Scholar
∗Downs, P. W. & Gregory, K. J. (1993). The sensitivity of river channels in the landscape system. In Landscape Sensitivity, ed. Thomas, D. S. G. & Allison, R. J.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
∗Drake, M. (1995). A brief survey of the insects of river banks with or without grazing along the River Itchen. English Nature Research Reports, 135.Google Scholar
Drongvang, B. (1998). Restoration of the rivers Brede, Cole and Skerne, III. Aquatic Conservation, 8, 209–22.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, D. & Corbett, C. (1995). Hills and Streams. An Ecology of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: University Press.Google Scholar
∗Eaton, J. W. & Freeman, J. (1982). Ten years' experience of weed control in the Leeds and Liverpool Canal. Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society 6th International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds. EWRS, pp. 96–104.Google Scholar
Economic Commission for Europe (1993). Protection of water resources and aquatic ecosystems. Water Series, United Nations, New York: 1.
Edelkraut, K. & Güsewelt, S. (2001). Effects of light and nutrient supply on the growth and competitive ability of five Carex species. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, 67, 57–72.Google Scholar
Edward-Jones, E. (1993). The Water of Leith integrated environment action plan. Edinburgh District Council.Google Scholar
∗Edwards, P. (1962). Trees and the English Landscape. London: Bell & Sons.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. R., Greaves, M. P. & Jackson, M. P. (2000). The potential for use of willows as components of practical buffer zones. Department of Agricultural Sciences, IACR, Long Ashton, University of Bristol.
Eiseltova, M. & Biggs, J. eds. (1995). Restoration of Stream Ecosystems. Slimbridge: International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau.Google Scholar
Environment Agency (1998). Walker, A. M.. Audit surveys in the Environment Agency, Thames Region.Google Scholar
∗Ernier, C. & Gutestarz, B. eds. (1991). Ecological Engineering for Wastewater Treatment. Germany: Boksgogen.Google Scholar
∗Evans, R. (1993). Sensitivity of the British landscape to erosion. In Landscape Sensitivity, Thomas, D. S. G. & Allison, R. J.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 189–210.Google Scholar
∗Everard, M. (2005). Water Meadows. Cardigan: Forrest Text.Google Scholar
Everard, M. (2000). Aquatic ecology, economy and society: the place of aquatic ecology in the sustainability agenda. Freshwater Forum, 13, 31–46.Google Scholar
Everard, M. (2001). Taking a systems-orientated view of phosphorus enrichment in fresh waters. Freshwater Forum, 15, 35.Google Scholar
Everard, M., James, B., Carty, P. & Powell, A. (2002). Implementing the water framework directive. FBA News, 17, 1–5.Google Scholar
Fairbrother, N. (1970). New Lives, New Landscapes. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, G. (2003). The long chain: archaeology, historical landscape characterisation and time depth in the landscape. In Landscape Interfaces, ed. Palang, H. & Fry, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Feld, S. & Basso, K. H. (1996). Sense of Place. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Feureira, T., Moreira, I., Wade, P. M. Pieterse, A. H., Caffrey, J. & Barrett, P. R. F. (1999). Advances in aquatic weed ecology and management: issues for the next millennium. Developments in Hydrobiology Series.
Finlayson, M., ed. (1992). Integrated management and conservation of wetlands in agricultural and forested landscapes. Wetlands Research Bureau, Slimbridge, 22.
Floodplain Forests (1997). Special Issue. Global Ecology and Biography Letters, 6.
Fokkens, B. & Monk, U. (2004). Using river restoration as a focus to guide river basin management. Restoration Centre, Silsoe, Bedfordshire.
∗Forman, R. T. T. & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Friday, L., ed. (1998). Wicken Fen, the Making of a Nature Reserve. Colchester: Harley Books.Google Scholar
Fukamachi, K., Oku, H. & Rackham, O. (2003). A comparative study on trees and hedgerows in Japan and England. In Landscape Interfaces, ed. Palang, H. & Fry, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Gaines, K. H. (2006). Does the equilibrium theory of island biogeography apply to dragonfly breeding ecology in a desert sinkhole complex? In Water and the landscape. Proceedings of the 19th annual IALE (UK) conference, ed. Davies, B. & Thompson, S., International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Chapter, pp. 64–71.Google Scholar
Gardiner, J. L. (1991). River Projects and Conservation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Garred, G. D. & Willis, K. G. (1996). Estimating the benefits of environmental enhancement: a case study of the River Darent. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗George, M. (1992). The Land Use, Ecology and Conservation of Broadland. Chichester: Packard.Google Scholar
∗Gerald of Wales (Giraldus Cambrensis, Twelfth Century). Travels Through Wales. London: Penguin.
Gerrard, A. J. W. (1993). Landscape sensitivity and change on Dartmoor. In Landscape Sensitivity, ed. Thomas, D. S. G. & Allison, R. J.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 49–64.Google Scholar
Giles, N. & Summers, D. (1996). Helping fish in lowland streams. Fordingbridge (Hants): Game Conservancy.
Gill, C. J. (1970). The flooding tolerance of woody species – a review. Forestry Abstracts, 31, 671–88.Google Scholar
∗Gilman, K. (1994). Hydrology and Wetland Conservation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Gilver, D., Davids, C., Tyler, A., Corbelli, D. & Thorburn, K. (2003). Assessing the feasibility of using remotely sensed data to date river hydromorphology and hydromorphic alteration to meet WFD obligations. Robson Meeting, IACR, Sonning on Thames.
∗Godwin, H. (1978). Fenland: the Ancient Past and Uncertain Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Golterman, H. L. (2004). The Chemistry of Phosphate and Nitrogen Compounds in Sediments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Goodson, J. (2003). Sediment and seed dynamics along rivers. Robson Meeting, IACR, Sonning on Thames.
Gopal, B.Junk, W. J. & Davis, J. A. (2001). Biodiversity in Wetlands: Assessment, Function and Conservation. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.Google Scholar
∗Delicata, Grech J. C. (1853). Flora Melitensis. Malta.Google Scholar
Grech, H. (2003). Dingli Cliffs score high in coastal evaluation study. The Times of Malta, 9 June.Google Scholar
Gregory, K. J., ed. (1983). Background to Palaeohydrology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Grison, R. (2001). A study of the significance of newly established hay meadows as a habitat for butterflies by means of a quantitative inventory of caterpillars and imagines. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, 68, 109.Google Scholar
Grootjans, A. P. (1985). Changes of groundwater regime in wet meadows. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Groningen.
Gunnison, D. & Baoko, J. W. (1987). The rhizosphere ecology of submerged macrophytes. Water Resource Bulletin, 25, 193–202.
Gurnell, A. M. (1998). The hydrogeomorphological effects of beaver dam building activity. Progress in Physical Geography, 22, 167–84.Google Scholar
∗Hammer, D. A., ed. (1989). Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Chelsea, Michigan: Lewis.Google Scholar
Hansson, L., Fahrig, L. & Merriam, L., eds. (1995). Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes. IALE Studies in Landscape Ecology 2. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnung, M. & Newson, M. D. (1986). Upland afforestation: influences on stream hydrology and chemistry. Soil Use and Management, 2, 61–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, D. M. & Ferguson, A. J. D., eds. (1995). The Ecological Basis of River Management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
∗Harper, D. M. & Smith, C. D. (1992). Habitats as the building blocks for river conservation assessment. In River Conservation and Management.Boon, P. J., Calow, P. & Petts, G. E.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 311–19.Google Scholar
Harper, D., Witkowski, F., Kemp-McCarthy, D. & Crabb, J. (1997). The distribution and abundance of riparian trees in English lowland floodplains. Global Ecology and Biography Letters, 6, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. S. C., Harris, I. T. B. & Armitage, P. D. (2000). The role of bankside habitat in river ecology: the importance of riparian vegetation on the distribution and abundance of aquatic invertebrates. Institute of Freshwater Ecology, Blandford Forum.
Haslam, H., ed. (1999). Regional geochemistry of Wales and part of west central England: stream water. British Geological Survey, Nottingham.
Haslam, , S. M. (1960). The vegetation of the Breck--Fen margin. Ph. D. Thesis University of Cambridge.
Haslam, S. M. (1973a). The management of British wetlands. I. Economic and amenity use. Journal of Environmental Management, 1, 303–2.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (1973b). The management of British wetlands. II. Conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 1, 345–61.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (1978). River Plants. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (1982). Vegetation in British Rivers. Nature Conservancy Council, 2 vols., pp. 203–5.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (1986). Causes of changes in river vegetation giving rise to complaints. Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society 7th International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, pp. 151–6.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (1987). River Plants of Western Europe. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M.(1990). River Pollution: An Ecological Perspective. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (1991). The Historic River. Cambridge: Cobden of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (1994). Wetland habitat differentiation and sensitivity to chemical pollutants (non-open water wetlands). London: HMSO, 2 vols.
Haslam, S. M. (1995). Cultural variation in river quality and macrophyte response. Acta Botanica Gallica, 142, 345–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (1996). Enhancing river vegetation: conservation, development and restoration. Hydrobiologia, 340, 345–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (1997a). The River Scene: Ecology and Cultural Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (1997b). River habitat fragmentation in Malta: a danger needing investigation. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 6, 43–7.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (1997c). Deterioration and fragmentation of rivers in Malta. Freshwater Forum, 9, 55–61.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (1997d). The precarious state of the rivers of Malta. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 6, 343–8.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (1998). The deterioration of water quality in Malta. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 7, 96–9.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (1999a). River patterns in landscapes. In Heterogeneity in Landscape Ecology Pattern and Scale. IALE (UK) ed. Maudsley, M. & Marshall, J., International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Branch, pp. 169–75.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (1999b). Ponds and pools of Malta: past and present. In Ponds and Pond Landscape of Europe. PondLife, ed. Boothby, J.. Liverpool: John Moores University, pp. 117–24.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (2000a). Socio-economic forces in Gozo (Maltese Islands) and landscape ecology analysis. In Quantitative Approaches to Landscape Ecology, ed. Clare, T. & Howard, D., International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Branch, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (2000b). Impact of land use changes on rivers. Aspects of Applied Biology, 58, 197–204.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (2000c). The evaluation of river pollution in the Maltese Islands. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 9, 347–51.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M. (2001). Retaining the cultural heritage of rivers? In Development of European Landscapes, ed. Mander, Ü, Rintsmann, A. & Palang, H. vol. 1, University of Tartu Press, pp. 206–9.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (2002). Stream community lists as bioindicators. Proceedings of the 11th European Weed Research Society International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, September 2–6. Moliets et Maâ, France, pp. 243–6.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (2003). Understanding Wetlands: Fen, Bog and Marsh. London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. (2006). River Plants. 2nd edn. Cardigan: Forrest Text.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. & Borg, J. (1998). The River Valleys of the Maltese Islands. Malta: Ciheam, Bari and Islands and Small States Institute, Foundation of International Studies.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M. & Wolseley, P. A. (1981). River Vegetation: Its Identification, Assessment and Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M., Sell, P. D. & Wolseley, P. A. (1977). A Flora of the Maltese Islands. Malta: University Press.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. M., Sinker, C. A. & Wolseley, P. A. (1982). British Water Plants. Field Studies Council Publication S10, 2nd edn.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M., Klötzli, F., Sukopp, H. & Szczepanski, A. (1998). The management of wetlands. In The Production Ecology of Wetlands. ed. Westlake, D. F., Kvet, J. and Szczepanski, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 405–64.Google Scholar
∗Haslam, S. M., Borg, J. & Psaila, J. M. (2004). River Kbir: The Hidden Wonder. Zabbar, Malta: Veritas Press.Google Scholar
Haury, J. (1995). Patterns of macrophyte distribution within a Breton brook compared with other study scales. Landscape and Urban Planning, 31, 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haury, J. (1996a). Macrophytes des cours d'eau: bioindication et habitat piscicole. Thèse d'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, Université de Rennes, I. vol. 3.
∗Haury, J. (1996b). Assessing function typology involving water quality, physical features and macrophytes in a Normandy river. Hydrobiologia, 340, 43–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Haury, J. & Aidara, L. G. (1999). Macrophyte cover and standing crop in the River Scorff and its tributaries (Brittany, north western France): scale, patterns and process. Hydrobiologia, 415, 109–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Haury, J. & Muller, S. (1991). Variations écologiques et chorologiques de la végétation macrophytique des rivières acides du Massif Armoricain et des Vosges du Nord (France). Review Science Eau, 4(4), 463–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Haury, J., Peltre, M. C., Muller, S.et al., (1996). Des indices macrophytiques pour estimer la qualité des cours d'eau frainçais: premières propositions. Ecologie, 27(4), 79–90.Google Scholar
∗Haury, J.Jaffre, M., Dutartre, A.et al. (1998). Application de l a méthode ‘Milieu Et Végétaux aquatiques fixés’ à 12 rivières françaises: typologie foristique préliminaire. Annales Limnologie, 34, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Haury, J., Dutartre, A., Binesse, F., Codhant, H. & Valkman, G. (2001). Macrophyte biotypologies of rivers in Lozère, France. Verbandlung Internationale Vereinung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie (Dublin 1998), 27(6), 3510–17.Google Scholar
∗Haury, J. Peltre, M.-C., Trémolières, M. (2002). A method involving macrophytes to assess water trophy and organic pollution: the Macrophyte Biological Index for Rivers – application to different types of rivers and pollutions. In Gestion des plantes aquatiques. Proceedings of the 11th European Weed Research Society International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, Dutartre, A. & Montel, M. H. N., 3–7 September 2002. Moliets et Maâ, France, pp. 247–50.Google Scholar
∗Haworth, E., Boar, G., Evans, I.et al. (2003). Tarns of the Central Lake District. Brathay Exploration Group Trust, Ambleside.Google Scholar
∗Haycock, N. E. & Burt, T. P. (1993a). Catchment sensitivity to nitrate leaching: the effectiveness of riparian zones in protecting stream ecosystems. In Landscape Sensitivity, ed. Thomas, D. S. G. & Allison, R. J.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 261–72.Google Scholar
∗Haycock, N. E. & Burt, T. P. (1993b). Role of floodplain sediments in reducing the nitrate concentration of subsurface run-off: a case study in the Cotswolds, UK. Hydrology Processes, 7, 287–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haycock, N. E. & Burt, T. P. (1993c). The sensitivity of rivers to nitrate leaching. In Landscape Sensitivity, ed. Thomas, D. S. G. & Allison, R. J.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 261–72.Google Scholar
∗Haycock, N. E. & Pinay, G. (1993). Nitrate retention in grass and poplar vegetated riparian buffer strips during the winter. Journal of Environmental Quality, 22, 273–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haycock, N. E., Pinay, G. & Walker, C. (1993). Nitrogen retention in river corridors: European perspective. Ambio, 22, 340–6.Google Scholar
Heath, D. (1991). River corridor surveys in Devon. Nature in Devon, 11, 4–11.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. L., Dindorf, C. J. & Rozumalski, F. J. (2002). Landscaping for Wildlife and Water Quality. Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota.Google Scholar
∗Higham, N. (1986). The Northern Counties to AD 1000. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hill, M. O. (1978). Vegetation changes resulting from afforestation of British uplands and bogs. Chief Scientists Team Report, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, 204.Google Scholar
∗Hofmann, K. (1991). The role of plants in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. In Ecological Engineering for Wastewater Treatment, ed. Ernier, C. & Guterstam, B., Gothenburg: Bokskogen, pp. 248–50.Google Scholar
∗Holloway, R. (2003). A river keeper's observations on invertebrate populations over 34 winters. FBA News, 23, 5–6.Google Scholar
Holmes, N. T. H. (1983a). Focus on nature conservation. 3. Classification of British rivers according to the flora. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough.
Holmes, N. T. H. (1983b). Focus on nature conservation. 4. Typing British rivers according to their macrophytic flora. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough.
Holmes, N. & Bradbrook, E. (2005). The river Darent: a strategy for recovery. River Restoration Centre, Silsoe, Bedfordshire, 27.
∗Holmes, P. (1974). That Alarming Malady. Cambridge Education Authority, Ely.Google Scholar
Hoskins, W. G. (1953). The Making of the English Landscape. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hoskins, W. G. (1973). English Landscapes. London: BBC.Google Scholar
∗Howorth, R. & Manning, C. (2006). Land use change and the water environment of the West Weald over a 30-year period, 1971–2001. In Water and the landscape. Proceedings of the 19th annual IALE (UK) conference, ed. Davies, B. & Thompson, S., International Association for Landscape Ecology, UK Chapter, pp. 126–33.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. M. R. & Heathwaite, A. L., eds. (1995). Hydrology and Hydrochemistry of British Wetlands. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
∗Ihse, M. & Lindahl, C. (2000). A holistic model for landscape ecology in practice: the Swedish survey and management of ancient meadows and pastures. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janauer, G. A. (2000). Ecohydrology: fusing concepts and scales. Ecological Engineering, 16, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janauer, G. A. (2002a). Water framework directive, European standards and the assessment of macrophytes in lakes: a methodology for scientific and practical application. Verh. Zool. Ges. Österreich, 139, 143–7.Google Scholar
Janauer, G. A. (2002b). Establishing ecohydrology in the real world: the Lobau Biosphere Reserve and the integrated water scheme in Vienna. In Ecohydrology and hydrobiology. The application of ecohydrology in water resources development and management. Proceedings of the final conference of the first phase of the IHP-V Project 2.3/2.4 on Ecohydrology, ed. Zalewski, M., Harper, D. M., Venice, September 2001, pp. 120–5.Google Scholar
Janauer, G. A. & Exler, N. (2003). Aquatic plants in the spotlight of international research. Danube Watch, 2, 26–28.Google Scholar
∗Janauer, G. A. & Exler, N. (2004). Distribution and habitat conditions of the six most frequent hydrophytes in the Danube River corridor: status 2002. Proceedings of the 35th IAD Conference. Novi Sad, Montenegro, pp. 407–12.Google Scholar
Janauer, G. A. & Wychera, U. (2000). Biodiversity, succession and the functioning role of macrophytes in the New Danube. Archivum Hydrobiologia (Supplement, Large Rivers), 12/1, 61–74.Google Scholar
Jefferies, D. J., Strachan, R. & Strachan, C. (2004). The catastrophic 99.8% crash of the water vole Arvicola terrestris population of Cambridgeshire (v.c. 29) between 1989 and 1997. Nature in Cambridgeshire, 46, 3–8.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, E., S⊘ndergaard, M., S⊘ndergaard, Marten & Christoffersen, K., eds. (1998). The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnes-Wright, G. & Gerrard, R. (2005). Strategic approach to flood risk management and habitat creation. River Restoration Centre, Silsoe, Bedfordshire, 26.
Jones, J. M. (1963). Local rivers as sources of power. Proceedings of the Birmingham Natural History and Philosophical Society, 20, 22–36.Google Scholar
Jones, M. (2003). The concept of cultural landscape. In Landscape Interfaces, ed. Palang, H. & Fry., G.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jousten, H. (2003). Perspectives of global peatland use and conservation. IMCG Newsletter, pp. 14–19.Google Scholar
Joyce, C. B. & Wade, P. M. (1998). European Wet Grasslands. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kark, R. (1992). Land–God–Man. In Ideology and Landscape in Historical Perspective, ed. Baker, A. R. H. & Biger, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
Keddy, P., Fraser, L. H. & Keaugh, T. A. (2001). Response of 21 wetland species to shortage of light, nitrogen and phosphorus. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, 67, 13–26.Google Scholar
Keddy, P. A. (2000). Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, J. J. (1996). The impact of drainage maintenance strategies on the flora of a low gradient, drained Irish salmonid river. Hydrobiologia, 340, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Kingsley, C. (1882). The Water Babies. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
∗Kirby, P. (1992). Habitat Management for Invertebrates. Sandy, Bedfordshire: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.Google Scholar
Klaas, D. (2003). Integrated river basin management in Air Hitam Laut River Basin, Sumatra. Newsletter 3. International Mire Conservation Group.Google Scholar
Kohler, A. & Janauer, G. A. (1995). Zur Methodik der Untersuchung von aquatischen Makrophyten in Fließgewässern. In Handbuch Angewandte Limnologie, ed. Ch. Steinberg, , Bernhardt, H. & Klapper, H., Landsberg: Ecomed Verlag.Google Scholar
∗Kohler, A. & Labus, B. C. (1983). Eutrophication process and pollution of freshwater ecosystems including waste heat. Physiological plant ecology (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. New series. vol. 12D), 4, 413–64.Google Scholar
∗Kohler, A. & Schneider, S. (2003). Macrophytes as bioindicators. Archivum Hydrobiologia (Supplement, Large Rivers. 14, 1–2).Google Scholar
∗Kohler, A. & Veit, U. (2003a). Makrophyten als biolgische Qualitätskomponente bei den Fließgewässern. Bewertun – Anmerkungen zur EU Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 35(12), 357–63.Google Scholar
∗Kohler, A. & Veit, U. (2003b). Die EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie – Anmerkungen aus der Sicht der Makrophytenforschung in Fließgewässern. Stuttgart
∗Kohler, A., Sipos, V. & Björk, S. (1996). Makrophytenvegetation und Standorte im humosen Bräkne Fluß (Südschweden). Bot. Jahrb. Syst., 118, 451–503.Google Scholar
∗Kohler, A., Sipos, V., Sonntag, E., Penksza, K., Pozzi, D. & Veit, U. (2000). Makrophytenverbreitung und Standortqualität im Bjorka-Kävlinge Fluß (Skåne, Südschweden). Hydrobiologia, 30, 281–98.Google Scholar
∗Kohler, A., Sonntag, E., Köhler, M.et al. (2003). Macrophyte distribution in the River Vils (Oberpfalz, Bavaria). Archivum Hydrobiologia (Supplement, Large Rivers 14, no. 1–2), 147/1–2, 33–53.Google Scholar
∗Kohler, A. (1978). Methoden der Katierung von Flora und Vegetation von Süsswassertiotopen. Land Schaft und Stadt, 10, 23–85.
Kondolf, G. M. (1998). Environmental effects of aggregate extraction from river channels and floodplains. In Aggregate Resources: A Global Perspective, ed. Bobrowsky, P. T., Vermont: A. A. Balkema, Brookfield, pp. 113–29.Google Scholar
∗Lachat, B. (1994). Guide de protection des berges de cours d'eau au techniques végétales. Ministère de L'Environment, Dirron Rhone Alpes.
Lambert, J. M. & Jennings, J. M. (1951). Alluvial stratigraphy and vegetational succession in the region of the Bure Valley broads: II. Journal of Ecology, 39, 149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landolt, E. (1975). Morphological differentiation and geographical distribution of the Lemna gibba–Lemna minor group. Aquatic Botany, 1, 345–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Lane, M. (1968). The Tale of Beatrix Potter. (Amazon Books) London: F. Warne & Co.Google Scholar
∗Leach, J. & Dawson, F. H. (1999). Crassula helmsii: an unwelcome invader. British Wildlife, April, pp. 115–19 & 145–9.Google Scholar
∗Lewan, L. (2001). Land use and natural resources. In Development of European Landscapes, Mander, Ü, Rintsmann, A. & Palang, H., vol. 1, University of Tartu, pp. 337–42.Google Scholar
Limbrey, S. (1983). Archaeology and Palaeohydrology. In Background to Palaeohydrology, ed. Gregory, K. J.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 189–212.Google Scholar
Linl⊘kken, A. (1997). Effects of in-stream habitat enhancement on fish populations of a small Norwegian stream. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research, 73, 50–9.Google Scholar
Maaranen, P. (2003). Landscape archaeology and management of ancient cultural heritage sites. In Landscape Interfaces, ed. Palang, H. & Fry, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, J. (1992). The Secret Thames. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Maddock, I. (1999). The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshwater Biology, 41, 373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Madsen, B. L. (1995). Danish Watercourses. Ten years with the new Watercourse Act. Danish Environment Protection Agency, Copenhagen, Milj⊘nyt, 11.Google Scholar
Maitland, P. S. (1996). The River Endrick – then and now – monitoring by photography. Freshwater Forum, 7, 7–22.Google Scholar
∗Malanson, G. P. (1993). Riparian Landscapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Mander, U.Printsmann, A., Palang, H., eds. (2001). Development of European Landscape. IALE European Conference (2001). Institute of Geography, University of Tartu. Vols. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Maquire, C. & Gibson, C. (2005). Ecological change in Lough Erne: influence of catchment changes and species invasions. Freshwater Forum, 24, 38–58.Google Scholar
Maudsley, M. & Marshall, J., eds. (1999). Heterogeneity in landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 1999 annual IALE (UK) conference. International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Branch.Google Scholar
∗Maxwell, G. (1960). Ring of Bright Water. Longmans, Green & Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. (1993). Ecosystem management by watersheds. NPS Newsletter, 32, 6–8.Google Scholar
McCauley, D. E. (1995). Effects of population dynamics on genetics in mosaic landscapes. In Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes. IALE Studies in Landscape Ecology 2, ed. Hansson, L., Fahrig, L., & Merriam, L.. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 179–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCollin, D. (2001). Contemporary themes in hedgerow research in the UK. In Hedgerows of the World, ed. Barr, C., & Petit, S., International Association of Landscape Ecology (IALE, UK), UK Branch, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar
∗McFarlane, R. (1999). Linking socio-economic driving forces to landscape ecology. In Quantitative approaches to landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 2000 Animal IALE (UK) conference, ed. Clare, T. & Howard, D., International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Branch, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
∗McLean, G. R. D. (1961). Celtic Spiritual Verse. Imprint SPCK (Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge): 22 November 2002.Google Scholar
Melman, P. J. M., Verkaar, H. G. & Heemsbergen, H. (1987). The maintenance of road verges as possible ecological corridors of grassland plants. In Conductivity in landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar of IALE, Munster, ed. Schreiber, K. F., Schörurgh, Paderborn, (1988) pp. 131–4.Google Scholar
Mesters, C. M. L. (1997). Polluted Dutch transboundary streams: effects on aquatic macrophytes. Ph. D. thesis, University of Utrecht.
Miller, S. H. & Skertchley, S. B. J. (1878). The Fenland, Past and Present. Wisbech: Leach & Sons.Google Scholar
Mineava, T. & Sirin, A. (2004). Climate change and peatlands, biodiversity aspects. IMCG Newsletter, p. 22.Google Scholar
∗Mitford, M. R. (1829). Our Village. (Sketches of rural character and scenery). Ave-Maria-Lane, London (1824/32): G. & W. B. Whittaker.Google Scholar
∗Mitsch, W., ed. (1994). Global Wetlands, Old World and New. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publications.Google Scholar
∗Mitsch, W. J. & Gosselink, J. G. (1993). Wetlands, 2nd edn. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Monteiro, A., Vasconselos, T. & Catarine, L. (1998). Management and ecology of aquatic plants. Proceedings of the 10th European Weed Research Society International Symposium of Aquatic Weeds.Google Scholar
Moore, P. D. & Bellamy, D. J. (1974). Peat Lands. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Morris, J. (2002). Economics of Washland creation. River Restoration Centre Conference Abstract.
∗Moshiri, G. A., ed. (1993). Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Moss, D. (1979). Changes in songbird populations associated with the conversion of open hill ground to forest. Chief Scientists Team Report, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, 239.Google Scholar
Mountford, J. & Sheail, J. (1987). The Pembrokeshire valleys as baseline for reading future changes in plant life. NCC Research Contract HF3/08/09. Nature Conservancy Council.
Mountford, O., Goodson, J., Gurnell, A. Thompson, K. & Clifford, N. (2001). Seeds and sediment. Quantifying the sources for riparian restoration. Poster. In Development of European Landscapes, ed. Mander, Ü, Rintsmann, A. & Palang, H., vol. 1, University of Tartu, pp. 206–9.Google Scholar
Munshower, F. F. (1993). Practical Handbook of Disturbed Land Vegetation. Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
National Rivers Authority (1992). Blackwater river catchment management plan: consultation draft. Reading.
National Rivers Authority (1994). Guidance for the control of invasive plants near watercourses. Bristol: National Rivers Authority.
National Rivers Authority (1996). River habitats in England and Wales. River Habitat Survey Report, 1.
National Rivers Authority (1996). River Habitats in England and Wales. Bristol: National Rivers Authority.
National Rivers Authority (1995). River Pollution from Farms in England. London: HMSO.
∗Neori, A.Reddy, K. R., Cisková-Koncalová, H. & Agami, M. (2000). Bioactive chemicals and biological–biochemical activities and their functions in rhizospheres of wetland plants. The Botanic Review, 66, 350–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbold, C., Purseglove, J. & Holmes, N. (1983). Nature Conservation and River Engineering. London: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
∗Newbold, C., Honnor, I. & Buckley, K. (1989). Nature Conservation and the Management of Drainage Channels. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
∗Nisbet, T. R. & Thomas, H. (2006). The role of woodland in flood control. In Water and the landscape. Proceedings of the 19th annual IALE (UK) conference, ed. Davies, B., & Thompson, S., International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Chapter, pp. 118–25.Google Scholar
Nolet, B. A. (1997). Management of the beaver (Castor fiber). Nature and Environment Series. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
∗Norden, J. (1610). The Surveiors Dialogue, Very Profitable for all Men to Peruse. London: Montague, 1739.Google Scholar
Norotny, V. & Olem, (1994). Water Quality: Prevention, Identification and Management of Defense Pollution. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhal.
Nuremberg Chronicle (1493). Schedel, H. Liber cronicarum, Nuremberg.
∗O'Hallaran, D.et al., eds. (1994). Geological and landscape conservation. Proceedings of the Malvern International Conference, 1993. London: Joint Nature Conservation Committee and others.Google Scholar
∗Olsen, O. R. K. (1993). Created and Natural Wetlands for Controlling non-point Source Pollution. Boca Raton, Florida: Smoley, CRC.Google Scholar
Opdam, P., Van Apeldoorn, R., Schotman, A. & Kalkhoven, J. (2001). Population responses to landscape fragmentation. In Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment, ed. Vos, C. C., & Opdam, P., (1993). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Oxford Department of External Studies (1981). The Evolution of Marshland Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
∗Padoa-Schioppa, E., Poggesi, M. C. & Bottoni, L. (2006). Using river basins as ecological units to evaluate landscape fragmentation. In Water and the landscape. Proceedings of the 19th annual IALE (UK) conference, Davies, B. & Thompson, S., International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Chapter, pp. 77–84.Google Scholar
∗Paetzold, A. & Tockner, K. (2006). Aquatic–terrestrial food web linkages along rivers. In Water and the landscape. Proceedings of the 19th annual IALE (UK) conference, ed. Davies, B. & Thompson, S., International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Chapter, pp. 201–7.Google Scholar
∗Page, S. E. & Rieley, J. O. (1992). Eutrophication and rehabilitation of Wybungurg Moss National Nature Reserve, Cheshire. In Peatland Ecosystems and Man, ed. Bragg, E. M., Hulme, P. D., Ingram, H. A. P. & Robertson, R. A., British Ecological Society, International Peat Society.Google Scholar
Palang, H. & Fry, G., eds. (2003). Landscape Interfaces. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, M. & Newbold, C. (1983). Wetland and riparian plants in Great Britain: an assessment of their status. Focus on Nature Conservation, 1.Google Scholar
Pan-European biological and landscape diversity strategy (1995). Nature and Environment, 74. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
Parker, D. M. (1992). Habitat Creation – a critical guide. English Nature Science, Peterborough, 21.Google Scholar
∗Parker, R. (1975). The Common Stream. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Parmenter, J. (1995). The Broadland fen resource survey. Broads Authority and English Nature, Norwich.
Patten, B. C., ed. (1990). Wetlands and Shallow Continental Water Bodies, vol 1. Natural and Human Relationships. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Patten, B. C., ed. (1994). Wetlands and Shallow Continental Water Bodies vol. 2 Case Studies. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing.
Pearson, G. & Frear, P. (2003). Use of angler catches to appraise the effectiveness of river habitat restoration on fish stocks. Robson Meeting, IACR, Sonning on Thames.
Peat, N. & Patrick, B. (2001). Wild Rivers. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
Peter, A. & Woolsey, S. (2005). Importance of local river widenings as rehabilitation measures: experiences from Switzerland. River Restoration Centre, Silsoe, Bedfordshire, 35.
∗Peterken, G. F. & Hughes, F. M. R. (1995). Restoration of floodplain forests in Britain. Forestry, 68, 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Peterken, G. F. (1996). Natural Woodland. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
∗Petts, G. & Calow, P. (1992). The Rivers Handbook. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
∗Petts, G. & Foster, I. (1985). Rivers and Landscape. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Piccolo, A., Celano, G. & Conte, P. (1996). Interactions between herbicides and humic substances. Pesticide Outlook, 1996, pp. 21–4.Google Scholar
Pieterse, A. H. (1975). Physiological, morphological and anatomical aspects of gibbosity in Lemna gibba. Aquatic Botany, 1, 333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planteijilt, R., Johngman, R. H. G. & Kerkstra, K. (2005). The future landscape of the River Aa. In (1988). Conductivity in Landscape Ecology, ed. K. F. Schreiber, pp. 141–4.
∗Porter, E. (1969). The river trade of old Cambridgeshire. Cambs Hunts and Peterborough Life. October, pp. 24–6 & 317–44.Google Scholar
∗Potter, B. (1906). The Tale of Mr Jeremy Fisher. London: F. Warne & Co.Google Scholar
∗Prach, K. (1992). Vegetation, microtopography and water table in the Luznice River flood plain, South Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. Preslia, Prague, 64, 357–67.Google Scholar
∗Prach, K. (1993). Vegetation changes in a wet meadow complex, South Bohemia, Czech Republic. Folia Geobotanica Phytotaxonomica, Prague, 28, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Prach, K. & Rauch, O. (1992). On filter effects of ecotones. Ekologia (CSFR), 11, 293–8.Google Scholar
∗Prach, K., Jeník, J. & Large, A. R. G. eds. (1997). Floodplain Ecology and Management. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
∗Prefill, P. P. & Volkman, N. (1999). Landscape in History: Design and Planning in the Eastern and Western Traditions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Purseglove, J. (1989). Taming the Flood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pysek, P., Prach, K.Rejmánek, M. & Wade, M. (1995). Plant Invasions. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Rackham, O. (1976). Trees and Woodland in the British Landscape. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
∗Rackham, O. (1986). The History of the Countryside. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
∗Rackham, O. & Moody, J. (1996). The Making of the Cretan Landscape. Manchester: University Press.Google Scholar
Rath, B., Janauer, G. A., Pall, K. & Berczik, A. (2003). The aquatic macrophyte vegetation in the Old Danube/Hungarian bank, and other water bodies of the Szigetköz wetlands. Archivum Hydrobiologia (Supplement, Large Rivers), 14/1–2, 129–42.Google Scholar
∗Raven, P. J., Fox, P., Everard, M., Holmes, H. T. H., & Dawson, F. H. (1997). River habitat survey: a new system to classify rivers according to their habitat quality. In Freshwater Quality: Defining the indefinable, ed. Boon, P. J.. London: HMSO, pp. 215–34.Google Scholar
∗Raven, P. J., Boon, P. J., Dawson, F. H. & Ferguson, A. J. D. (1998a). Towards an integrated approach to classifying and evaluating rivers in the UK. Special Issue: the application of classification and assessment methods to river management in the UK. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8(4), 383–93.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Raven, P. J., Holmes, N. T. H., Dawson, F. H. & Everard, M. (1998b). Quality assessment using river habitat survey data. Special issue: the application of classification and assessment methods to river management in the UK. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8(4), 477–99.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Raven, P. J., Holmes, N. T. H., Dawson, F. H., Fox, P. J. A., Everard, M., Fozzard, I. & Rouen, K. J. (1998c). River habitat quality: the physical character of rivers and streams in the UK and Isle of Man. River Habitat Survey Report No. 2. Environment Agency, Bristol.
Raven, P. J., Holmes, N. T. H., Dawson, F. H.et al., eds. (1998d). River habitat quality. Aquatic Conservation, 8.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, P. J., Holmes, N. T. H., Naura, M. & Dawson, F. H. (1999). River habitat survey and its use in environmental assessment and integrated river basin management in the UK. International conference on assessing the ecological integrity of running waters, Vienna, 1998.
Read, K. Fermar, P. & Bundy, C. (2005). Riverine and floodplain rehabilitation best practice: a case study at Aston Hall Farm. River Restoration Centre, Silsoe, Bedfordshire, 36.
∗Reddy, K. R. & Smith, W. H., eds. (1987). Aquatic Plants for Water Treatment and Resource Recovery. Orlando, Florida: Magnolia Publishers.Google Scholar
Regional Flood Defence Committee (1997). Flood defence policy on environmental enhancement. Environment Agency, Thames Region.
∗Richardson, P. (2003). New echoes from Batworld. Natural World, 19, 22–4.Google Scholar
∗Rieley, J. & Page, S. (1990). Ecology of Plant Communities. London: Longman.Google Scholar
∗River Restoration Centre [various dates]. Manual of Techniques, Newsletters, Database, River Restoration Project, etc., Silsoe, Bedfordshire.
Robach, F., Eglin, I. & Trémolières, M. (1997). Species richness of aquatic macrophytes in former channels connected to a river: a comparison between two fluvial hydrosystems differing in their regime and regulation. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 6, 267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röck, S. & Kaiser, O. (2005). Assessment of stream passage obstructions caused by flood detention basins. River Restoration Centre, Silsoe, Bedfordshire, 43.
Rodwell, J. S., ed. (1991). British Plant Communities. Woodlands and Scrub. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
∗Rodwell, J. S., ed. (1992). British Plant Communities, Grasslands and Mountain Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
∗Rodwell, J. S., ed. (1995). British Plant Communities, Aquatic Communities, Swamps and Tall-herb Fens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rukec, C. D. A. & Overend, R. P., eds. (1987). Proceedings of Symposium 1987. Wetlands / peatlands. Edmonton, Alberta.
Sabater, F., Sabater, S. & Armengol, J. (1990). Chemical characteristics of a Mediterranean river as influenced by land uses in the watershed. Water Research, 24, 143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, S. & Delcross, P. (2002). Using the hedges and spatial analysis for studying vegetation (laricio pine and beech) dynamics in Corsica (France). 11th European Weed Research Society International Symposium, Landes, France, poster.
∗Saliba, P. C., Magro Conti, J. & Borg, C. (2002). A study of landscape and irrigation systems at is-Simblija, limits of Dingli. Malta and Conservation project. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, ARAMIS, Malta.
Sand-Jensen, K. & Rasmussen, L. (1978). Macrophytes and chemistry of acidic streams from lignite mining areas. Bot. Tideskr., 72, 105–12.
Sansom, A. (1993). Ponds and Conservation. York: National Rivers Authority.
Sarlöv-Herlin, I. & Fry, G. (2001). Managing wooded boundaries to improve wildlife experience in near-urban areas. In Development of European Landscapes, Mander, Ü, Rintsmann, A. & Palang, H., vol. 1, University of Tartu, pp. 486–90.Google Scholar
Schneeweiss, N. & Beckmann, H. (1998). The ponds of the young-moraine-landscape: habitats and centres of distribution of amphibians in Brandenberg (NE Germany). In Ponds and Pond Landscape of Europe. PondLife, ed. Boothby, J.. John Moores University, Liverpool, pp. 197–202.Google Scholar
Schreiber, K. F. ed. (1988). Connectivity in landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar of International Association for Landscape Ecology, Munster 1987. Schörurgh, Paderborn, pp. 11–16.Google Scholar
Schropp, M. H. & Babber, C. (1998). Secondary channels as a basis for the ecological rehabilitation of Dutch rivers. Aquatic Conservation, 8, 53–9.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S. & Angell, G. (2005). Implementing the biodiversity strategy and action plans for the Environment Agency (Thames Region) through partnership. River Restoration Centre, Silsoe, Bedfordshire, 45.
Sear, D. & Elliott, M. (2005). Sustainable wetland restoration in the New Forest. River Restoration Centre, Silsoe, Bedfordshire, 44.
Sear, D., Armitage, P. D. & Dawson, F. H. (1999). Groundwater dominated rivers. Hydrological Processes, 13, 255–77.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sear, D. A. (1994). River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic Conservation, 4, 169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidel, K. (1967). Aquatic plants purify sewage. Umschau, 67, 565.Google Scholar
Seidel, K. (1968). Eliminatio van Schmitz- und Balastoffen aus belustaten Gewässern durch höhere pflanzen, Zeitschrift Nitalstoffen-zwilisations krankheitan, 4.Google Scholar
Shafer, E. L. & Brush, R. O. (1977). How to measure preferences for photographs of natural landscape. Landscape Planning, 4, 237–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, E. L., Hamilton, J. F. & Schmidt, E. A. (1969). Natural landscape preferences: a predictive model. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheail, J. (1976). The land use history of the Huntingdonshire fenland, with special reference to the Holme Fen and Woodwalton Fen NNRs. NCC Research Contract F3/03/27. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.
Sipes, U. K. (2001). Makrophyten-vegetation und standarb in eutrophen und humosum fliesege-wässen. Benichte des Institutle foir Landschafts-und Pflanzenökalogie den Universität Hohenheim, 13.
∗Sipos, V., Kohler, A. & Björk, S. (2000). Makrophytenvegetation und Standorte im eutrophen Björka Fluß (Südschweden). Botanisches Jahrbuch Systematicsche, 122, 93–152.Google Scholar
Sipos, V. K., Kohler, A. & Veit, U. (2001). Vergleichende Kennzeichnung der Makrophytenvegetation verschiedener Fliessgewässertypen anhand quantitativer Kenngrössen. Berichte: Institut für Landschafts- und Pflanzenökologie Universitåt Hobenheim, 10, 33–56.Google Scholar
∗Skowronek, E., Krükowska, R. & Swieca, A. (2003). Transformations of cultural landscape. In Landscape Interfaces, ed. Palang, H. & Fry, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SKYSCAN Mackay, J. (1992). The Secret Thames. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G. & Morgan, L. A. (1989). A succession to ombiotrophic bog in the Gwent Levels and its demise. New Phytologist, 112, 195–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S⊘nderjyllend Amtskommune (1982). Unders⊘gelse of okkarindholdets in Flydelse på invertebratfaunen i vida system at 1979–80. Teknisk Forvaltning Milj⊘fdelingen.
Spink, A. J., Murphy, K. J. & Westlake, D. R. F. (1997). Distribution and environmental regulation of species of Ranunculus subgenus Batrachium in British rivers. Archivum Hydrobiologica, 139, 509–25.Google Scholar
∗Sporrong, O., Ekstam, U. & Samudesan, K. (1995). Swedish Landscapes. Stockholm: Swedish Environment Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Ssymonk, A. & Hauho, U. (1998). Landscape ecology of calcareous fens (Caricion davallianae) and the Cladicetum marisci in the lowlands of N E Germany and their relevance for nature conservation in the European Union Habitats Directive. Phytocoenelogia, 28, 105–42.Google Scholar
Sterba, O.Melotova, J., Krskova, M., Samsonova, P. & Harker, D. (1997). Floodplain forests and river restoration. Global Ecology and Biography Letter, 6, 331–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Stoate, C., Whitfield, M., Williams, P. & Driver, K. (2006). Wetland habitat creation and mitigation of water pollution from field drains: use of buffer strip pods within an arable landscape. In Water and the landscape. Proceedings of the 19th annual IALE (UK) conference, Davies, B. & Thompson, S., International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Chapter, pp. 331–4.Google Scholar
∗Storey, E. (1993). The Winter Fens. Oxford: Isis.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, D., ed. (2001). Lakes assessment and the EU Water Framework Directive. Freshwater Forum, 16.Google Scholar
Suwannee 1985 (1985). State of Florida, Department of Environmental Regulation.
Swale and Ure Washlands Project (2001). A future for the Washlands. North Yorkshire County Council.
∗Swanwick, C. (2002). Landscape Character Assessment. Wetherby: Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage.Google Scholar
Symoens, J. J., Hooper, S. S. & Compère, P., eds. (1982). Studies on Aquatic Vascular Plants. Brussels: Royal Botanical Society of Belgium.Google Scholar
Tabacchi, E. & Planty-Tabaichi, A. M. (2002). Changes in alien and native weedy vegetation along rivers. What's new? 11th European Weed Research Society International Symposium, Landes, France, pp. 439–42.
∗Tansley, A. G. (1911). Types of British Vegetation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapsell, S. M. (1995). River restoration: what are we restoring to? A case study of the Ravensbourne River, London. Landscape Research, 20, 98–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacker, F. S. (1909). The Stripling Thames. London: Fred S. Thacker, Holborn.Google Scholar
Thacker, F. S. (1914). The Thames Highway. London: Fred S. Thacker, Holborn.Google Scholar
∗Thomas, D. S. A. & Allison, R. J., eds. (1993). Landscape Sensitivity. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Thorne, C. J. R. (1995). A Summary Checklist of the Birds of Wicken Fen. Guides to Wicken Fen.Google Scholar
Thorne, C. R. (1996). Stream Reconnaissance Handbook. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ticehurst, N. F. (1957). The Mute Swan in England. London: Cleaver Hume.Google Scholar
Trémolières, M. & Mullen, S., eds. (1995). Macrophytes aquatique et qualité de l'eau. Acta Botanica Gallia, 142 (6).Google Scholar
∗Trémolières, M., Carbiener, R.Urtscheit, A. & Klein, J. P. (1944). Change in aquatic vegetation in Rhine floodplains in Alsace in relation to disturbance. Journal of Vegetation Science, 5, 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Trémolières, M., Carbiener, D., Carbiener, R.et al. (1991). Zones inondable, végétation et qualité de l'eau en milieu alluvial Rhonen: e'lle de Rhinan, un site de recherches integrées. Bulletin Ecologique, 22, 317–36.Google Scholar
Trémolières, M., Eglin, I., Roeck, U. & Carbiener, R. (1993a). The exchange process between river and groundwater on the Central Alsace flood plain (Eastern France). I. Hydrobiologia, 254, 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trémolières, M., Eglin, I., Roeck, U. & Carbiener, R. (1993b). The exchange process between river and groundwater on the Central Alsace floodplain (Eastern France). II. The case of the canalised river Rhine. Hydrobiologia, 259, 133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Trémolières, M., Roeck, U., Klein, J. P. & Carbiener, R. (1994). The exchange process between river and groundwater on the Central Alsace flood plain (Eastern France). III. The case of a river with functional flood plain. Hydrobiologia, 273, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremp, H. & Kohler, A. (1995). The usefulness of macrophyte monitoring-systems, exemplified on eutrophication and acidification of running waters. Acta Botanica Gallica, 142, 541–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Triest, L. (2002). Macrophytes as biological indicators of Belgian rivers: a comparison of macrophyte indices with those of other organisms in high quality headwaters. Proceedings of the 11th European Weed Research Society International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds. September 2–6. Moliets et Maâ, France, pp. 263–66.Google Scholar
Ullrich, K. S. (2001). The influence of wildflower strips on plant and insect (heteroptera) diversity in an arable landscape. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, 68, 121–2.Google Scholar
Urciuolo, A. & Iturrapse, R. (2004). Workshop management of water basis regulated by peatland. IMCG Newsletter, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
Van Buuren, M. & Kerkstra, K. (1993). The framework concept and the hydrological landscape structure. In Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment, ed. Vos, C. C., & Opdam, P.. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Veit, U. & Kohler, A. (2003). Long-term study of the macrophytic vegetation in the running waters of the friedberger Au (near Augsburg, Germany). Archivum Hydrobiol (Supplement, Large Rivers, 14/1–2), 147/1–2, 65–86.Google Scholar
∗Veit, U., Zeltner, G.-H. & Kohler, A. (1997). Die Makrophytenvegetation des Fließgewässersystems der Friedberger Au (bei Augsburg) – Ihre Entwicklung von 1972 bis 1996. Berlin Institut Landschafts- Pflanzenökologie (Univ. Hohenheim), 4, 7–241.Google Scholar
∗Verhoeven, J. T. A. (1992). Fens and bogs in The Netherlands: history, nutrient dynamics and conservation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Vink, A. P. A. (1983). Landscape Ecology and Land Use. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ax, G. (2001). Nature meets Pasture. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, 68, 111.Google Scholar
Vos, C. C. & Chardon, J. P. (1997). Landscape resistance and dispersal in fragmented populations. In Species dispersal and land use processes. Proceedings of the 6th annual conference of IALE (UK), ed. Cooper, A. & Power, J., International Association of Landscape Ecology, UK Branch, pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
∗Vos, C. C. & Opdam, P., eds. (1993). Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Vymazal, J.Brix, H., Cooper, P. F., Green, M. B. & Hobert, R., eds. (1998). Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment in Europe. Leiden: Backhuys.Google Scholar
∗Vymazal, J. ed. (2001). Transformations of Nutrients in Natural and Constructed Wetlands. Leiden: Backhuys.Google Scholar
Waal, L. C.et al., eds. (1994). Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
∗Wait, G. A. 1997. Archaeological Heritage. In The River Scene, ed. Haslam, S. M.. Cambridge: University Press, pp. 297–302.Google Scholar
Walker, J. & Reuter, D. J., eds. (1996). Indicators of Catchment Health. Victoria: CSIRO.
Ward, D. (1991). River banks and their bird communities. Occasional papers in environmental studies. Riverbank Conservation, 11, Hatfield Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Ward, D.Holmes, N. T. H. & José, P., eds. (1994). The New Rivers and Wildlife Handbook. Sandy, Bedfordshire: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.Google Scholar
Ward, J. V. (1989). The four-dimensional nature of tolic ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 8, 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Warnock, S., Griffiths, G., Porter, J. & Simmons, E. (2001). The cultural component of landscape character assessment. In Development of European Landscapes, ed. Mander, Ü, Rintsmann, A. & Palang, H., vol. 1, University of Tartu, pp. 229–32.CrossRef
Westlake, D. F. & Dawson, F. H. (1982). Thirty years of weed cutting on a chalk stream. Proceedings of the 6th European Weed Research Council Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, pp. 132–40.Google Scholar
Westlake, D. F. & Dawson, F. H. (1986). The management of Ranunculus calcareus by pre-emptive cutting in southern England. European Weed Research Society, Association of Applied Biologists, 7th International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, pp. 395–400.
Westlake, D. F. & Dawson, F. H. (1988). The effects of autumnal weed cuts in a lowland stream on water levels and flooding in the following springs. Verhandlung international Vereinung theoretische angewante Limnologiae, 23, 1273–77.Google Scholar
Westlake, D. F., Casey, H., Dawson, F. H., Ladle, M., Mann, R. H. K. & Marker, A. F. H. (1972). The chalk stream ecosystem. In Productivity Problems of Freshwaters Warsaw–Kracov, ed. Kajak, Z. & Hillbricht-Ilkowska, A., pp. 615–635.Google Scholar
∗Westlake, D. F., Kvet, J. & Sczepanski, A., eds. (1998). The Production Ecology of Wetlands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weston, D. E. (no date). The Lark Navigation. Bury St Edmunds: D. W. Weston.
Wheeldon, J. & Dagmar, J. (2004). Stream-restoring a chalk river system on a catchment scale. River Restoration Centre, Silsoe, Bedfordshire.
∗Wheeler, B. D. & Shaw, S. C. (1992). Biological indicators of the dehydration and changes to East Anglian fens past and present. English Nature Research Reports, 20.Google Scholar
Wheeler, B. D., Shaw, S. C., Fojt, W. J. & Robertson, R. A. (1995). Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
∗White, G. (1788). The Natural History of Selbourne. London (1977): Penguin.Google Scholar
White, P. C. L., Gregory, K. W., Lindley, P. J. & Richards, G. (1997). Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain: A case study of the otter Lutra lutra and the water vole Arvicola terrestris. Biological Conservation, 82, 345–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitton, B. A., Boulton, P. N. G., Clegg, E. M.et al. (1998). Long-term changes in macrophytes of British rivers: 1. River Wear. The Science of the Total Environment, 210/11, 411–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyle, L. (1962). Medieval Technology and Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
∗Wildig, J. (2000). Mynydd y ffynnon. Aspects of Applied Biology, 58, 159–66.Google Scholar
∗Williams, J. H., Kingham, H. G., Cooper, D. J. & Regle, S. J. (1977). Growth regulator injury to tomatoes in Essex, England. Environmental Pollution, 12, 145–57.Google Scholar
∗Williams, M. (1970). The Draining of the Somerset Levels. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
∗Williams, M. (1974). The Making of the South Australian Landscape. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Winteler, M. (2001). Fen rotation fallow near lake Gneifenses (2H)Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, 68, 112.Google Scholar
Wolseley, P. A., James, P. W., Theobald, M. R. & Sutton, M. A. (2006). Detecting changes in epiphytic lichen communities at site affected by atmospheric ammonia from agricultural sources. The Lichenologist, 38, 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolseley, P. A., Stafor, S., Mitchell, R.et al. (2006). Variation of lichen communities with land use in Aberdeenshire, UK. The Lichenologist, 38, 307–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worall, P. (2002). Putting function back into the flood plain. River Restoration Centre Conference Abstract.
Wright, J. F., Sutcliffe, D. W., Furse, M. Y., eds. (2000). Assessing the biological quality of freshwater s-c rivpace and other techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside.
∗Yonge, C. M. (1864). The Trial. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • S. M. Haslam, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Riverscape and the River
  • Online publication: 10 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542060.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • S. M. Haslam, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Riverscape and the River
  • Online publication: 10 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542060.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • S. M. Haslam, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Riverscape and the River
  • Online publication: 10 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542060.017
Available formats
×