Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications Systems Networked Infrastructure in Extreme Events
Book contents
- Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications Systems
- Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Fundamental Supporting Concepts
- 3 Resilience Models and Metrics
- 4 Dependencies and Interdependencies and Their Effect on Resilience
- 5 Disaster Forensics of Infrastructure Systems
- 6 Electric Power Grid Resilience
- 7 Resilience of Information and Communication Networks
- 8 Integrated Electric Power and Communications Infrastructure Resilience
- 9 Infrastructure Systems Planning for Improved Resilience
- Index
- References
9 - Infrastructure Systems Planning for Improved Resilience
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2024
Book contents
- Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications Systems
- Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Fundamental Supporting Concepts
- 3 Resilience Models and Metrics
- 4 Dependencies and Interdependencies and Their Effect on Resilience
- 5 Disaster Forensics of Infrastructure Systems
- 6 Electric Power Grid Resilience
- 7 Resilience of Information and Communication Networks
- 8 Integrated Electric Power and Communications Infrastructure Resilience
- 9 Infrastructure Systems Planning for Improved Resilience
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter explains problems associated with planning infrastructure systems in order to improve resilience. Understanding the concept and basic methods for planning infrastructure investments is an important aspect for studying resilience because planning is a key process that contributes to resilience preparedness and adaptation attributes. Initially, the chapter discusses the fundamental problems and issues found when making decisions about investment allocations amid uncertain conditions. Then, probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) as still the main tool used in industry in planning processes is explained. Because characterizing intensity and other relevant attributes of disruptive events is an important component of planning processes for enhancing resilience, this chapter continues by exploring how these events – and especially hurricanes – can be characterized in order to obtain information that can be used as input for the planning process. Finally, the chapter concludes by discussing economic concepts and tools related to infrastructure resilience enhancement planning processes.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications SystemsNetworked Infrastructure in Extreme Events, pp. 452 - 485Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Boardman, M. E., “Known unknowns: the illusion of terrorism insurance.” Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 783–844, Mar. 2005.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, M., “The problem of uncertainty in strategic planning.” Survival, Global Politics and Strategy, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 131–146, Nov. 2006.Google Scholar
Breeding, R. J., Leahy, T. J., and Young, J., “Probabilistic Risk Assessment Course Documentation Volume 1: PRA Fundamentals,” Sandia National Lab document SAND85-1495, Albuquerque, NM, Aug. 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, E. J., “Proposed Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA), Policy Statement and Implementation Plan,” Aug. 1994. www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/047/28047464.pdfv.2020.Google Scholar
Dickson, T. J., “Calculating risks: Fine’s mathematical formula 30 years later.” Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, vol. 6, pp. 31–39, Oct. 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shneiderbauer, S. and Ehrlich, D., “Risk, Hazard, and People’s Vulnerability to Natural Hazards,” European Commission Directorate General Joint Research Center, EUR 21410 EN, 2004.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. A. and Lambert, K. B., “Comparing the hurricane disaster risk of US coastal counties.” Natural Hazards Review, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 132–142, Aug. 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetes, R., Gallagher, K., Olsen, M., Schoeny, R., and Stahl, C., “Probabilistic Risk Assessment to Inform Decision Making: Frequently Asked Questions,” US Environmental Protection Agency document number EPA/100/R‐09/001B, Washington, DC, July 2014.Google Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Technology planning for electric power supply in critical events considering a bulk grid, backup power plants, and micro-grids.” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 167–178, June 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, S., “Reliability Considerations for Data Centers Power Architectures,” in Proceedings of INTELEC 2011, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Meta Group, “IT Performance Engineering and Measurement Strategies: Quantifying Performance and Loss,” Fibre Channel Industry Association, Oct. 2000.Google Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Realistic Assessment of Building Power Supply Resilience for Information and Communications Technologies Systems,” in Proceedings of IEEE INTELEC 2016, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamone, C. P., “Appendix to Charles P. Salamone’s Direct Testimony on Behalf of the Division of Rate Counsel,” State of New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, BPU Docket Nos. EO13020155 and GO13020156, Oct. 2013.Google Scholar
Pletka, R., Khangura, J., Rawlins, A. et al., “Capital Costs for Transmission and Substations: Updated Recommendations for WECC Transmission Expansion Planning,” Black and Veatch Project no. 181374, Feb. 2014.Google Scholar
Munich RE, “Data on natural disasters since 1980: Munich Re’s NatCatSERVICE,” www.munichre.com/en/solutions/for-industry-clients/natcatservice.html, last accessed Aug. 2020.Google Scholar
Saaty, T. L., Elements of Queueing Theory with Applications, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1961.Google Scholar
Russell, L. R. and Schueller, G. I., Probabilistic models for Texas Gulf Coast hurricane occurrences.” Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1–10, Mar. 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, S., “Bayesian Nonparametric Modeling for Some Classes of Temporal Point Processes,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad de California Santa Cruz, Mar. 2015.Google Scholar
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., and Kuhlicke, C., “The risk perception paradox – implications for governance and communication of natural hazards.” Risk Analysis, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1049–1065, June 2013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, Y. and Li, Y., “Getting ready for mega disasters: the role of past experience in changing disaster consciousness.” Disaster Prevention and Management, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 492–505, Aug. 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, L., Zhou, Y., Han, Y. et al. “Effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in China,” PNAS, vol. 110, no. 49, pp. 19742–19747, Dec. 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takano, R., “Chubu Electric argues that 18-meter wall can beat 23-meter tsunami.” Asahi Shimbun, September 22, 2012; no longer available online.Google Scholar
US Department of Energy, “Comparing the Impacts of the 2005 and 2008 Hurricanes on US Energy Infrastructure,” Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Feb. 2009.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, V. and Kwasinski, A., “Characterization of Power System Outages Caused by Hurricanes through Localized Intensity Indices,” in Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, G., “Impact of Flooding on Power System Restoration Following a Hurricane,” M.S. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, July 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R. and Glade, T., “Multi-hazard analysis in natural risk assessments.” WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, vol. 77, pp. 1–10, Jan. 2004.Google Scholar
Kappes, M., Keiler, M., Elverfeldt, K. V., and Glade, T., “Challenges of dealing with multi-hazard risk: A review.” Natural Hazards, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 1925–1958, Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edison Electric Institute, “Before and After the Storm: A Compilation of Recent Studies, Programs, and Policies Related to Storm Hardening and Resiliency,” updated March 2014. www.eei.org/issuesandpolicy/electricreliability/mutualassistance/Documents/Before%20and%20After%20the%20Storm.pdf, last accessed Nov. 2019.Google Scholar