Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:33:11.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Surgical Sperm Retrieval Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

By
Phil V. Bach  and
Peter N. Schlegel
Edited by
Jeffrey M. Goldberg ,
Ceana H. Nezhat  and
Jay Ira Sandlow
Jeffrey M. Goldberg
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic
Ceana H. Nezhat
Affiliation:
Nezhat Medical Center, Atlanta
Jay Ira Sandlow
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Reproductive Surgery
The Society for Reproductive Surgeons' Manual
 , pp. 138 - 145
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jarow, JP, Espeland, MA, Lipshultz, LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989;142(1):62–5.Google Scholar
Jow, WW, Steckel, J, Schlegel, PN, Magid, MS, Goldstein, M. Motile sperm in human testis biopsy specimens. J Androl. 1993;14(3):194–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramasamy, R, Ricci, JA, Palermo, GD, Gosden, LV, Rosenwaks, Z, Schlegel, PN. Successful fertility treatment for Klinefelter’s syndrome. J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1108–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopps, CV, Mielnik, A, Goldstein, M, Palermo, GD, Rosenwaks, Z, Schlegel, PN. Detection of sperm in men with Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa, AZFb and AZFc regions. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(8):1660–5.Google Scholar
Schlegel, PN, Su, LM. Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(8):1688–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weedin, JW, Khera, M, Lipshultz, LI. Varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2010;183(6):2309–15.Google Scholar
Schlegel, PN, Kaufmann, J. Role of varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(6):1585–8.Google Scholar
Inci, K, Hascicek, M, Kara, O, Dikmen, AV, Gürgan, T, Ergen, A. Sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and treated and untreated varicocele. J Urol. 2009;182(4):1500–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haydardedeoglu, B, Turunc, T, Kilicdag, EB, Gul, U, Bagis, T. The effect of prior varicocelectomy in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a retrospective pilot study. Urology. 2010;75(1):83–6.Google Scholar
Raman, JD, Schlegel, PN. Aromatase inhibitors for male infertility. J Urol. 2002;167(2, Part 1):624–9.Google Scholar
Ostad, M, Liotta, D, Ye, Z, Schlegel, PN. Testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia: results of a multibiopsy approach with optimized tissue dispersion. Urology. 1998;52(4):692–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dardashti, K, Williams, RH, Goldstein, M. Microsurgical testis biopsy: a novel technique for retrieval of testicular tissue. J Urol. 2000;163(4):1206–7.Google Scholar
Mehta, A, Hsiao, W, King, P, Schlegel, PN. Perioperative celecoxib decreases opioid use in patients undergoing testicular surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2013;190(5):1834–8.Google Scholar
Levine, LA, Fakouri, BJ. Experience with vasal sperm aspiration. J Urol. 1998;159(5):1551–3.Google Scholar
Qiu, Y, Wang, S, Yang, D, Wang, L. Percutaneous vasal sperm aspiration and intrauterine insemination for infertile males with anejaculation. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(3):618–20.Google Scholar
Bernie, AM, Ramasamy, R, Stember, DS, Stahl, PJ. Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration: indications, techniques and outcomes. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(1):40–3.Google Scholar
Van Peperstraten, A, Proctor, ML, Johnson, NP, Philipson, G. Techniques for surgical retrieval of sperm prior to intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for azoospermia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD002807. doi(2):CD002807.Google Scholar
Nicopoullos, JDM, Gilling-Smith, C, Almeida, PA, Norman-Taylor, J, Grace, I, Ramsay, JWA. Use of surgical sperm retrieval in azoospermic men: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2004 Sep;82(3):691–701.Google Scholar
Esteves, SC, Miyaoka, R, Orosz, JE, Agarwal, A. An update on sperm retrieval techniques for azoospermic males. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68 Suppl 1:99–110.Google Scholar
Donoso, P, Tournaye, H, Devroey, P. Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(6): 539–49.Google Scholar
Schlegel, PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):131–5.Google Scholar
Dabaja, AA, Schlegel, PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(1):35–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedler, S, Raziel, A, Strassburger, D, Soffer, Y, Komarovsky, D, Ron-El, R. Testicular sperm retrieval by percutaneous fine needle sperm aspiration compared with testicular sperm extraction by open biopsy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(7):1488–93.Google Scholar
Schlegel, PN, Su, LM. Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(8):1688–92.Google Scholar
Okada, H, Dobashi, M, Yamazaki, T, et al. Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2002;168(3):1063–7.Google Scholar
Ramasamy, R, Yagan, N, Schlegel, PN. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology. 2005;65(6):1190–4.Google Scholar
Deruyver, Y, Vanderschueren, D, Van der Aa, F. Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review. Andrology. 2014;2(1):20–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×