Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The rod of the Lord: ideology and the outbreak of the First Anglo-Dutch War
- Part II To unite against the common enemy: the 1654 Treaty of Westminster and the end of apocalyptic foreign policy
- Part III Popery, trade, and universal monarchy: ideology and the outbreak of the Second Anglo-Dutch War
- 11 Historiographical overview
- 12 The establishment of an Orangist foreign policy
- 13 The Anglo-Dutch treaty of 1662
- 14 The Northern Rebellion and the reestablishment of Anglican Royalist consensus
- 15 The April 1664 trade resolution
- 16 Popery, trade, and universal monarchy
- Part IV The Medway, Breda, and the Triple Alliance: the collapse of Anglican Royalist Foreign Policy
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Titles in the series
13 - The Anglo-Dutch treaty of 1662
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The rod of the Lord: ideology and the outbreak of the First Anglo-Dutch War
- Part II To unite against the common enemy: the 1654 Treaty of Westminster and the end of apocalyptic foreign policy
- Part III Popery, trade, and universal monarchy: ideology and the outbreak of the Second Anglo-Dutch War
- 11 Historiographical overview
- 12 The establishment of an Orangist foreign policy
- 13 The Anglo-Dutch treaty of 1662
- 14 The Northern Rebellion and the reestablishment of Anglican Royalist consensus
- 15 The April 1664 trade resolution
- 16 Popery, trade, and universal monarchy
- Part IV The Medway, Breda, and the Triple Alliance: the collapse of Anglican Royalist Foreign Policy
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Titles in the series
Summary
Despite the predictions of all the international pundits, no Anglo-Dutch war did break out in the summer of 1662. What explains this tremendous change of events? In order to answer that question it is necessary to examine English domestic politics.
The Restoration, even if it was not a complete return to the pre-Civil War polity, was a victory for the Anglican Royalists. Republicans, religious radicals, and even some Cromwellians were quite dissatisfied with the new regime. But the discussion and ultimate passage in May 1662 of the Act of Uniformity deeply offended the sensibilities of the Presbyterians who considered themselves responsible for the triumphant return of Charles II. The strict requirements of the Act of Uniformity made it impossible for even the more moderate of Presbyterian clergymen to remain within the Established Church. For many it must have seemed as if the ideological and religious divisions of the late 1630s and 1640s had been recreated.
Not surprisingly the movement of the Bill for Uniformity through the Houses of Parliament began to rekindle old fears. The Essex minister Ralph Josselin “heard many strange passages visional and prophetical of alterations in England.” The passage of the Act forced Independents, Presbyterians, and sectaries to shelve the differences which had dominated the politics of the 1640s and 1650s. “Three or four societies that for this 12 years or more could scarcely give each other a good word now upon publishing of the Act of Uniformity are all united,” warned the government informant William Williamson, “there will be some villainy designed or else they lost their old orders.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Protestantism and PatriotismIdeologies and the Making of English Foreign Policy, 1650–1668, pp. 214 - 221Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1996