Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:09:06.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Soil Acidity

from Part II - Pedology, Physics, Chemistry and Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2019

Pedro A. Sanchez
Pedro A. Sanchez
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics , pp. 210 - 235
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abruña, F, Vicente-Chandler, J and Pearson, RW. 1964. Effects of liming on yields and composition of heavily fertilized grasses and on soil properties under humid tropical conditions. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 28: 657–661.Google Scholar
Abruña, F, Vicente-Chandler, J and Pearson, RW. 1970. Crop response to soil acidity factors in Ultisols and Oxisols. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 34: 629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abruña, F, Pearson, RW and Perez-Escolar, R. 1975. Lime responses of corn and beans grown on typical Ultisols and Oxisols of Puerto Rico. Soil Management in Tropical America, Bornemisza, E and Alvarado, A (eds.). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, pp. 261–281.Google Scholar
Adams, F (ed.). 1984. Soil Acidity and Liming, 2nd edition. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvim, PT. 1981. A perspective appraisal of perennial crops in the Amazon Basin. Amazonia, Agriculture and Land Use Research, Hecht, SB Nores, GA, Sanchez, PA, Spain, JM and Toenniessen, G (eds.). CIAT, Cali, pp. 311–328.Google Scholar
Amaral, AZ, Verdade, FC, Schmidt, NC, Wutke, ACP and Igue, K. 1965. Parcelamento e intervalo de aplicação de calcário. Bragantia 24: 83–96.Google Scholar
Andrew, CS and van den Berg, PJ. 1973. The influence of aluminum on phosphate sorption by whole plants and excised roots of some pasture legumes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24: 341–351.Google Scholar
Andrew, CS, Johnson, AD and Sandland, RL. 1973. Effect of aluminum on the growth and chemical composition of some tropical and temperate pasture legumes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24: 325–329.Google Scholar
Ayres, AS, Hagihara, HH and Stanford, G. 1965. Significance of extractable aluminum in Hawaiian sugar cane soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 29: 387–392.Google Scholar
Bahia-Filho, AFC, Magnavaca, R, Schaffert, RE and Alves, VMC. 1997. Identification, utilization, and economic impact of maize germplasm tolerant to low levels of phosphorus and toxic levels of exchangeable aluminum in Brazilian soils. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar
Binkley, D and Richter, D. 1987. Nutrient cycles and H+ budgets of forest ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 16: 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, NC and Weil, RR. 2008. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 14th edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
Brenes, E and Pearson, RW. 1973. Root responses of three Gramineae species to soil acidity in an Oxisol and an Ultisol. Soil Science 116: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromfield, SM, Cumming, RW, Williams, DJ and Williams, CH. 1983. Change in soil pH, manganese and aluminum under subterranean clover pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Health 23: 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cate, RB and Sukhai, AP. 1964. A study of aluminum in rice soils. Soil Science 98: 85–93.Google Scholar
Caudle, N. 1991. Groundworks 1: Managing Soil Acidity. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
Cochrane, TT, Salinas, JG and Sanchez, PA. 1980. An equation for liming acid mineral soils to compensate crop aluminum tolerance. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 57: 133–140.Google Scholar
Coleman, NT and Thomas, GW. 1967. The basic chemistry of soil acidity. Agronomy Monographs 12: 1–41.Google Scholar
Date, RA, Grundon, NJ, Rayment, GE and Probert, ME (eds.). 1995. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Principles and Management. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Davelouis, JR. 1990. Green Manure Applications to Minimize Aluminum Toxicity in the Peruvian Amazon. PhD Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
de Freitas, LMM and van Raij, B. 1975. Residual effects of liming a sandy clay loam Latosol. Soil Management in Tropical America, Bornemisza, E and Alvarado, A (eds.). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, pp. 300–307.Google Scholar
de Sousa, DMG, Vilela, L, Lobato, E and Castro, LHR. 1989. Métodos para determinar as necessidades de calagem em solos dos Cerrados. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 13: 193–198.Google Scholar
Duke, JA. 1978. The quest for tolerant germplasm. ASA Special Publication 32: 1–61.Google Scholar
Evans, CE and Kamprath, EJ. 1970. Lime response as related to percent aluminum saturation, soil solution aluminum and organic matter content. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 34: 893–896.Google Scholar
Farina, MPW. 1997. Management of subsoil acidity outside the humid tropics. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 179–190.Google Scholar
Farina, MPW and Channon, P.1988. Acid-subsoil amelioration: I. A comparison of several mechanical procedures II. Gypsum effects on growth and subsoil chemical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52:169–180.Google Scholar
Farina, MPW, de Villiers, M, Barnard, R and Walters, M (eds.). 2001. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH Symposium: Integrated Management and Use of Acid Soils for Sustainable Production. Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Fox, RL, DeDatta, SK and Wang, JM. 1964. Phosphorus and aluminum uptake by Latosols in relation to liming. Transactions 8th International Congress of Soil Science (Bucharest) 4: 595–603.Google Scholar
Foy, CD. 1974. Effects of aluminum on plant growth. The Plant Root and Its Environment, Carson, EW (ed.). University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, pp. 601–642.Google Scholar
Foy, CD. 1997. Tailoring plants to fit problem soils: Progress and problems for future research. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 55–57.Google Scholar
Foy, CD and Brown, JC. 1964. Toxic factors in acid soils. II. Differential aluminum tolerance of plant species. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 28: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, AR, Tiwari, RP, Reeve, WG and Dilworth, MJ. 1997. The response of root nodule bacteria to acid stress. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 123–138.Google Scholar
Goedert, WG, Lobato, E and Lourenço, S. 1997. Nutrient use efficiency in Brazilian soils: Nutrient management and plant efficiency. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 97–104.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Erico, E, Kamprath, EJ, Naderman, GC and Soares, WV. 1979. Effect of depth of lime incorporation on the growth of corn in an Oxisol of central Brazil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 43: 1155–1158.Google Scholar
Hansen, JW. 1989. Influence of Decomposing Organic Material on Aluminum Chemistry and Phytotoxicity. PhD Thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
Hardy, F. 1926. The role of aluminum in soil infertility and toxicity. Journal of Agricultural Science 16: 616–631.Google Scholar
Helyar, KR. 1991. The management of acid soils. Plant–Soil Interactions at low pH. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH, 24–29 June 1990, Beckley, West Virginia, USA, Wright, RJ, Baligar, VC and Murrmann, RP (eds.). Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 365–382.Google Scholar
Hue, NV, Vega, S and Silva, JA. 2001. Manganese toxicity in a Hawaiian Oxisol as affected by soil pH and organic amendments. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65: 153–160.Google Scholar
Juo, ASR and Kamprath, EJ. 1979. Copper chloride as an extractant for estimating the potentially reactive aluminum pool in acid soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 43: 35–38.Google Scholar
Kamprath, EJ. 1970. Exchangeable aluminum as a criterion for liming leached mineral soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 34: 252–254.Google Scholar
Kamprath, EJ. 1971. Potential detrimental effects from liming highly weathered soils to neutrality. Proceedings Soil Science Society of Florida 31: 200–203.Google Scholar
Kamprath, EJ. 1972. Soil acidity and liming. Soils of the Humid Tropics. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp. 136–149.Google Scholar
Kamprath, EJ. 1984. Crop response to lime on soils in the tropics. Soil Acidity and Liming, 2nd edition, Adams, F (ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 349–368.Google Scholar
Kamprath, EJ. 1997. Introductory comments. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 193–194.Google Scholar
Keltjens, WG. 1997. Plant adaptation and tolerance to acid soils: Its possible Al avoidance – a review. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 109–117.Google Scholar
Kochian, LV. 2001. Investigating the complexity of aluminum tolerance mechanisms in cereal crops. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH Symposium: Integrated Management and Use of Acid Soils for Sustainable Production, Farina, MMW, de Villiers, M, Barnard, R and Walters, M (eds.). Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, p. 205.Google Scholar
Lavelle, P, Chauvel, A and Fragoso, C. 1995. Faunal activity in acid soils. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Principles and Management, Date, RA, Grundon, NJ, Rayment, GE and Probert, ME (eds.). Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, H, Wan, H, Shaff, J and Kochian, LV. 2006. Phosphorus and aluminum interactions in soybean in relation to aluminum tolerance. Exudation of specific organic acids from different regions of the intact root system. Plant Physiology 141: 674–684.Google Scholar
Lin, CF and Coleman, NT. 1960. The measurement of exchangeable aluminum in soil and clays. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 23: 12–18.Google Scholar
Lopes, AS and Cox, FR. 1977. A survey of the fertility status of surface soils under “Cerrado” vegetation in Brazil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41: 742–747.Google Scholar
Lopes, AS, Silva, MC and Guilherme, LRG. 1991. Acidez do Solo e Calagem. Associação Nacional para Difusão de Adubos e Corretivos Agrícolas (ANDA), São Paulo.Google Scholar
Magalhaes, JV, Liu, J, Guimarães, CT, Lana, UGP, Alves, VMC, Wang, YH, Schaffert, RE, Hoekenga, OA, Piñeros, MA, Shaff, JE, Klein, PE, Carneiro, NP, Coelho, CM, Trick, HN and Kochian, LV. 2007. A gene in the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family confers aluminum tolerance in sorghum. Nature Genetics 39: 1156–1161.Google Scholar
Mahilum, BC, Fox, RL and Silva, JA. 1970. Residual effects of liming volcanic ash soils in the tropics. Soil Science 109: 102–109.Google Scholar
Méndez-Lay, J. 1973. Effects of Lime on Phosphorus Fixation and Plant Growth in Various Soils of Panama. MS Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
Mikklesen, DS, de Freitas, LMM and McClung, AC. 1963. Effects of Liming and Fertilizing Cotton, Corn and Soybean on Campo Cerrado Soils: State of São Paulo, Brazil. International Research Institute Bulletin 29. IRI Research Institute, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Moniz, AC, Furlani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantanarella, H (eds.). 1997. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production. Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas.Google Scholar
Morelli, M, Igue, K and Fuentes, R. 1971. Effect of liming on the exchange complex and on the movement of calcium and magnesium. Turrialba 21: 317–322.Google Scholar
Motavalli, PP. 1989. The Effects of Organic and Inorganic Amendments on Sulfur Availability to Maize in an Oxisol of Brazil. PhD Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ngachie, V and Smyth, TJ. 1989. Relationships between buffer acidity and exchangeable acidity in lime trials with Ultisols and Histosols. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 20: 1427–1438.Google Scholar
Ngatunga, EL, Cools, N, Dondeyne, S, Deckers, JA and Merckx, R. 2001. Buffering capacity of cashew soils in southeastern Tanzania. Soil Use and Management 17: 155–162.Google Scholar
Nye, PH, Craig, D, Coleman, NT and Ragland, JL. 1961. Ion exchange equilibrium involving aluminum. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 25: 14–17.Google Scholar
Palm, CA, Sanchez, PA, Ahamed, S and Awiti, A. 2007. Soils: A contemporary perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32: 99–129.Google Scholar
Pearson, RW. 1975. Soil Acidity and Liming in the Humid Tropics. Cornell International Agriculture Bulletin 30. New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Pearson, RW, Abruña, F and Vicente-Chandler, J. 1962. Effects of lime and nitrogen applications on the downward movement of Ca and Mg in two humid tropical soils of Puerto Rico. Soil Science 93: 77–82.Google Scholar
Rechcigl, JE and Sparks, DL. 1985. Effect of acid rain on the soil environment: A review. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 16: 653–680.Google Scholar
Reeve, NG and Sumner, ME. 1970. Lime requirements of Natal Oxisols based on exchangeable aluminum. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 34: 595–598.Google Scholar
Reeve, NG and Sumner, ME. 1972. Amelioration of subsoil acidity in Natal Oxisols by leaching of surface applied amendments. Agrochemophysica 4: 1–5.Google Scholar
Richardson, HL. 1951. Soil acidity and liming with tropical crops. World Crops 3: 339–340.Google Scholar
Richter, DD. 1986. Sources of acidity in some forested Udults. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50: 1584–1589.Google Scholar
Ritchey, KD and de Sousa, DMG. 1997. Use of gypsum in management of subsoil acidity in Oxisols. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 165–178.Google Scholar
Ritchey, KD, Souza, DMG, Lobato, E and Correa, O. 1980. Calcium leaching to increase rooting depth in Brazilian savannah Oxisols. Agronomy Journal 72: 40–44.Google Scholar
Ritchey, KD, Silva, JE and Costa, UF. 1982. Calcium deficiency in clayey B horizons of savannah Oxisols. Soil Science 133: 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufyikiri, G and Hennebert, P. 1995. Gestion des Sols Acides en Régions d ‘Altitude à Occupation Intense: Le Kirimiro au Burundi. Faculte de Sciences Agronomiques, University du Burundi, Bujumbura.Google Scholar
Salinas, JG. 1978. Differential Response to Some Cereals and Bean Cultivars to Al and P Stress in an Oxisol of Central Brazil. PhD Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
Salinas, JG and Sanchez, PA. 1976. Soil–plant relationships affecting varietal and species differences in tolerance to low available soil phosphorus. Ciência e Cultura 28: 156–168.Google Scholar
Sanchez, PA and Buol, SW. 1974. Properties of some soils of the upper Amazon Basin of Peru. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 38: 117–121.Google Scholar
Sanchez, PA and Salinas, JG. 1981. Low-input technology for managing Oxisols and Ultisols in tropical America. Advances in Agronomy 34: 279–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, PA and Salinas, JG. 1982. Suelos Ácidos: Estrategias para su Manejo con Bajos Insumos en América Tropical. Sociedad Colombiana de la Ciencia del Suelo, Bogotá.Google Scholar
Sanchez, PA and Logan, TJ. 1992. Myths and science about the chemistry and fertility of soils in the tropics. Myths and Science of Soils of the Tropics. SSSA Special Publication 29, Lal, R and Sanchez, PA (eds.). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 35–46.Google Scholar
Sharifuddin, HAH, Shamshuddin, J, Grundon, NJ, Edwards, DG and Zaharah, R. 1995. Residual effects of dolomitic limestone on corn grown on an acidic Malaysian Ultisol. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Principles and Management, Date, RA, Grundon, NJ, Rayment, GE and Probert, ME (eds.). Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 511–517.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, HE, McLean, EO and Pratt, PF. 1961. Buffer methods for determining lime requirements of soils with appreciable amounts of extractable aluminum. Soil Science Society of American Proceedings 25: 274–277.Google Scholar
Silva, AR da. 1977. Application of the plant genetic approach to wheat culture in Brazil. Plant Adaptation to Mineral Stress in Problem Soils, Wright, MJ (ed.). Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp. 223–255.Google Scholar
Siqueira, JO and Moreira, FMS. 1997. Microbial populations and activities in highly weathered acidic soils: Highlights of the Brazilian research. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar
Spain, JM, Francis, CA, Howeler, RH and Calvo, F. 1975. Differential species and varietal tolerance to soil acidity in tropical crops and pastures. Soil Management in Tropical America, Bornemisza, E and Alvarado, A (eds.). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, pp. 308–324.Google Scholar
Sumner, ME. 1993. Gypsum and acid soils: The world scene. Advances in Agronomy 51: 1–32.Google Scholar
Sumner, ME. 1997. Procedures used for diagnosis and correction of soil acidity: A critical review. Plant-soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 195–204.Google Scholar
Sumner, ME. 2001. Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH Symposium: Integrated Management and Use of Acid Soils for Sustainable Production, Farina, MMW, de Villiers, M, Barnard, R and Walters, M (eds.). Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Taylor, GJ. 1997. Mechanisms of plant adaptation and tolerance to acid soils. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 107–108.Google Scholar
Thomas, GW. 1988. Beyond exchangeable aluminum: Another round on the soil acidity merry-go-round. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 19: 833–856.Google Scholar
Thomas, GW and Hargrove, WL. 1984. The chemistry of soil acidity. Soil Acidity and Liming, 2nd edition, Adams, F (ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 3–56.Google Scholar
Tyler, EJ, Buol, SW and Sanchez, PA. 1978. Genetic association of soil properties encountered in a detailed soil survey in the Upper Amazon Basin of Peru. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42: 771–776.Google Scholar
van Raij, B. 1991. Fertilidade do Solo e Adubação. Ceres, São Paulo.Google Scholar
van Raij, B. 2008. Gesso na Agricultura. Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, São Paulo.Google Scholar
van Raij, B, Cantarella, H, Quaggio, JA and Furlani, AMC. 1997. Methods for diagnosis and correction of soil acidity in Brazil: An overview. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry Production, Moniz, AC, Fulani, AMC, Schaffert, RE, Fageria, NK, Rosolem, CA and Cantarella, H (eds.). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Campinas, pp. 205–214.Google Scholar
Villagarcía, S. 1973. Aluminum Tolerance in the Irish Potato and the Influence of Substrate Aluminum on Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Potatoes. PhD Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
Villamízar, F and Lotero, J. 1967. Respuesta del pasto pangola a diferentes fuentes y dosis de nitrógeno. Revista Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario 2: 57–70.Google Scholar
Wong, MTF, Akyeampong, E, Nortcliff, S, Rao, MR and Swift, RS. 1995. Initial responses of maize and beans to decreased concentrations of monomeric inorganic aluminum with application of manure or tree prunings in an Oxisol in Burundi. Plant and Soil 171: 275–282.Google Scholar
Wright, RJ, Baligar, VC and Murrmann, RP (eds.). 1991. Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH, 24–29 June 1990, Beckley, West Virginia, USA. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Yamoah, CF, Burleigh, JR and Eylands, VJ. 1992. Correction of acid infertility in Rwandan Oxisols with lime from an indigenous source for sustainable cropping. Experimental Agriculture 28: 417 – 424.Google Scholar
Zeigler, RS, Panadey, S, Miles, J, Gourley, LM and Sarkarung, S. 1995. Advances in the selection and breeding of acid–tolerant plants: Rice, maize, sorghum and tropical forages. Plant–Soil Interactions at Low pH: Principles and Management, Date, RA, Grundon, NJ, Rayment, GE and Probert, ME (eds.). Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 391–406.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Soil Acidity
  • Pedro A. Sanchez, University of Florida
  • Book: Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics
  • Online publication: 09 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316809785.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Soil Acidity
  • Pedro A. Sanchez, University of Florida
  • Book: Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics
  • Online publication: 09 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316809785.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Soil Acidity
  • Pedro A. Sanchez, University of Florida
  • Book: Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics
  • Online publication: 09 January 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316809785.011
Available formats
×