References

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2020

Edited by

Colin Elman ,

John Gerring and

James Mahoney

Show author details

Colin Elman: Affiliation:
Syracuse University, New York
John Gerring: Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
James Mahoney: Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Production of Knowledge
Enhancing Progress in Social Science
, pp. 487 - 542

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAPOR. 2017. “AAPOR Transparency Certification Agreement.” Oakbrook Terrace, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research. www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/AAPORTransparencyCertificationAgreement-Revised-October-2017.pdf.Google Scholar

Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, Andrew. 2011. “Library Research Infrastructure for Humanistic and Social Scientific Scholarship in the Twentieth Century.” Pp. 43–88 in Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil and Lamont, Michèle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Abend, Gabriel. 2006. “Styles of Sociological Thought: Sociologies, Epistemologies, and the Mexican and U.S. Quests for Truth.” Sociological Theory 24: 1–41.CrossRef Google Scholar

Abreu, Maria, de Groot, Henri L. F. and Florax, Raymond J. G. M.. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis of β-Convergence: The Legendary 2%.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 389–420.CrossRef Google Scholar

Abt, Helmut A. and Garfield, Eugene. 2002. “Is the Relationship between Numbers of References and Paper Lengths the Same for All Sciences?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (13): 1106–1112.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A.. 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369–1401.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A.. 2002. “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1231–1294.Google Scholar

AEA. 2018. “Reports from the American Economics Association Committee on the Status of Women in the Profession.” www.aeaweb.org/content/file?id=6388.Google Scholar

Aiken, Alexander M., Davey, Calum, Hargreaves, James R. and Hayes, Richard J.. 2015. “Re-Analysis of Health and Educational Impacts of a School-Based Deworming Programme in Western Kenya: A Pure Replication.” International Journal of Epidemiology 44 (5): 1572–1580.Google Scholar

Akbaritabar, Aliakbar and Squazzoni, Flaminio. 2018. “Gender and Ethnic Patterns of Publication in Top Sociology Journals (Success Stories Only!).” GECS (Research Group in Experimental and Computational Sociology) seminars, January 10, 2018, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.Google Scholar

Alatas, Vivi, Banerjee, Abhijit, Hanna, Rema, Olken, Benjamin A. and Tobias, Julia. 2012. “Targeting the Poor: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” American Economic Review 102 (4): 1206–1240.Google Scholar

Albouy, David Y. 2012. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Comment.” American Economic Review 102 (6): 3059–3076.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ale Ebrahim, Nader, Ebrahimian, Hamed, Mousavi, Maryam and Tahriri, Farzad. 2015. “Does a Long Reference List Guarantee More Citations? Analysis of Malaysian Highly Cited and Review Papers.” International Journal of Management Science and Business 1 (3): 6–15.Google Scholar

Alimohammadi, Dariush and Sajjadi, Mahshid. 2009. “Correlation between References and Citations.” Webology 6 (2): a71.Google Scholar

Allcott, Hunt and Taubinsky, Dmitry. 2015. “Evaluating Behaviorally Motivated Policy: Experimental Evidence from the Lightbulb Market.” American Economic Review 105 (8): 2501–2538.Google Scholar

Altbach, Philip G. (ed). 2000. The Changing Academic Workplace: Comparative Perspectives. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for International Higher Education.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., Jean Clipperton, Emily Schraudenbach and Laura Rozier. 2018. “Gender and Status in American Political Science: Who Determines Whether a Scholar Is Noteworthy?” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3235786.Google Scholar

American Political Science Association (APSA). 2012. A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar

Amsen, Eva. 2014. “What Is Open Peer Review?” F1000Research, May 21. http://blog.f1000research.com/2014/05/21/what-is-open-peer-review/.Google Scholar

Anderson, Christopher J., Bahník, Štěpán, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, Bosco, Frank A., Chandler, Jesse, Chartier, Christopher R., Cheung, Felix, et al. 2016. “Response to Comment on ‘Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.’” Science 351 (6277): 1037.Google Scholar

Anderson, Melissa S., Martinson, Brian C. and Vries, Raymond De. 2007. “Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2 (4): 3–14.Google Scholar

Anderson, Michael L. 2008. “Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103 (484): 1481–1495.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, Richard G. and Dewald, William G.. 1994. “Replication and Scientific Standards in Applied Economics a Decade after the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review no. Nov: 79–83.Google Scholar

Anderson, Richard G., Greene, William H., McCullough, Bruce D. and Vinod, Hrishikesh D.. 2008. “The Role of Data/Code Archives in the Future of Economic Research.” Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1): 99–119.Google Scholar

Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick and Mueller-Langer, Frank. 2014. “Open Access to Data: An Ideal Professed but Not Practised.” Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.008.Google Scholar

Angell, Robert. 1936. The Family Encounters the Depression. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 3–30.Google Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2014. Mastering ‘Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ankeny, Rachel A. 2011. “Using Cases to Establish Novel Diagnoses: Creating Generic Facts by Making Particular Facts Travel Together.” Pp. 252–272 in S. Morgan and P. Howlett (eds), How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Annas, George J. 2003. “HIPAA Regulations – A New Era of Medical-Record Privacy?” New England Journal of Medicine 348 (15): 1486–1490.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Antecol, Heather, Bedard, Kelly and Stearns, Jenna. 2018. “Equal but Inequitable: Who Benefits from Gender-Neutral Tenure Clock Stopping Policies?” American Economic Review 108 (9): 2420–2441.Google Scholar

APA. 2016. “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.” Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf.Google Scholar

APSA. 2012. A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar

APSA. 2016. “P- WAM20: Pipeline for Women and Minorities in the 20 Largest Departments – Data for Faculty and Students.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar

ASA. 1997. “Code of Ethics of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics.” Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/code_of_ethics_aug_2017_2_1.pdf.Google Scholar

Ashenfelter, Orley and Greenstone, Michael. 2004. “Estimating the Value of a Statistical Life: The Importance of Omitted Variables and Publication Bias.” Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies., Working Papers: 105, 2004. http://search.proquest.com/econlit/docview/56626726/1A493319C9B3407FPQ/4?accountid=14496.Google Scholar

Ashenfelter, Orley, Harmon, Colm and Oosterbeek, Hessel. 1999. “A Review of Estimates of the Schooling/Earnings Relationship, with Tests for Publication Bias.” Princeton, Department of Economics – Industrial Relations Sections, Princeton, Department of Economics – Industrial Relations Sections, 1999. http://search.proquest.com/econlit/docview/56307618/5A788ADBA14C479EPQ/2?accountid=14496.Google Scholar

Atchison, Amy L. 2017. “Negating the Gender Citation Advantage in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 448–455.Google Scholar

Atmanspacher, Harald and Maasen, Sabine (eds). 2016. Reproducibility: Principles, Problems, Practices, and Prospects. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Babcock, Linda, Recalde, Maria P. and Vesterlund, Lise. 2017a. “Gender Differences in the Allocation of Low-Promotability Tasks: The Role of Backlash.” American Economic Review, 107 (5): 131–135.CrossRef Google Scholar

Babcock, Linda, Recalde, Maria P., Vesterlund, Lise and Weingart, Laurie. 2017b. “Gender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Tasks with Low Promotability.” American Economic Review, 107 (3): 714–747.Google Scholar

Backhouse, Roger E. and Morgan, Mary S.. 2000. “Introduction: Is Data Mining a Methodological Problem?” Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (2): 171–81.Google Scholar

Bai, Liang, Handel, Benjamin, Miguel, Edward and Rao, Gautam. 2015. “Self-Control and Chronic Illness: Evidence from Commitment Contracts for Doctor Visits.” Unpublished manuscript. UC Berkeley.Google Scholar

Baicker, Katherine, Finkelstein, Amy, Song, Jae and Taubman, Sarah. 2014. “The Impact of Medicaid on Labor Market Activity and Program Participation: Evidence from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.” American Economic Review 104 (5): 322–328.Google Scholar

Baicker, Katherine, Taubman, Sarah L., Allen, Heidi L., Bernstein, Mira, Gruber, Jonathan H., Newhouse, Joseph P., Schneider, Eric C., Wright, Bill J., Zaslavsky, Alan M. and Finkelstein, Amy N.. 2013. “The Oregon Experiment – Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes.” New England Journal of Medicine 368 (18): 1713–1722.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bakkensen, Laura A. and Larson, William. 2014. “Population Matters When Modeling Hurricane Fatalities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (50): E5331–E5332.Google Scholar PubMed

Ball, P. 2008. “A Longer Paper Gathers More Citations.” Nature 455 (7211): 274–275.Google Scholar

Bandalos, Deborah L. 2018. Measurement Theory and Applications in the Social Sciences. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Bar-Sinai, Michael, Sweeney, Latanya and Crosas, Merce. 2016. “DataTags, Data Handling Policy Spaces and the Tags Language.” In 2016 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 1–8. doi:10.1109/SPW.2016.11.Google Scholar

Bargh, John A., Chen, Mark and Burrows, Lara. 1996. “Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype-Activation on Action.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 230–244.Google Scholar

Barnes, Tiffany D. and Beaulieu, Emily. 2017. “Engaging Women: Addressing the Gender Gap in Women’s Networking and Productivity.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 461–466.Google Scholar

Barone, Tom and Elliot, Eisner (eds). 2011. Arts-Based Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 1997. “Specification Uncertainty and Model Averaging.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 641–674.Google Scholar

Barton, Allen. 1979. “Paul Lazarsfeld and Applied Social Research: Invention of the University Applied Social Research Institute.” Social Science History 3 (3): 4–44.Google Scholar

Barton, Judith. 1984. Guide to the Bureau of Applied Social Research. New York: Clearwater Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Basken, Paul. 2018. “UT-Austin Professors Join Campaign Against Faculty-Productivity Company.” Chronicle of Higher Education (January 24).Google Scholar

Bastow, Simon, Dunleavy, Patrick and Tinkler, Jane. 2014. The Impact of the Social Sciences: How Academics and their Research Make a Difference. London: Sage Publications.CrossRef Google Scholar

Basu, Aparna. 2006. “Using ISI’s ‘Highly Cited Researchers’ to Obtain a Country Level Indicator of Citation Excellence.” Scientometrics 68(3): 361–375.Google Scholar

Bateman, Ian, Kahneman, Daniel, Munro, Alistair, Starmer, Chris and Sugden, Robert. 2005. “Testing Competing Models of Loss Aversion: An Adversarial Collaboration.” Journal of Public Economics, The Experimental Approaches to Public Economics 89 (8): 1561–1580.Google Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F. 2016. “Charting the Future of Social Psychology on Stormy Seas: Winners, Losers, and Recommendations.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66: 153–158.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F. and Leary, Mark R.. 1997. “Writing Narrative Literature Reviews.” Review of General Psychology 1 (3): 311.Google Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F. and Vohs., Kathleen D. 2016. “Misguided Effort with Elusive Implications.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (4): 574–575.Google Scholar

Beach, Derek and Pederson, Rasmus Brun. 2013. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Ester, Pande, Rohini and Topalova, Petia. 2008. Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Beaman, Lori, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini and Topalova, Petia. 2012. “Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India.” Science 335 (6068): 582–586.Google Scholar

Bear, Julia B. and Collier, Benjamin. 2016. “Where are the Women in Wikipedia? Understanding the Different Psychological Experiences of Men and Women in Wikipedia.” Sex Roles 74 (5–6): 254–265.Google Scholar

Begg, Colin, Cho, Mildred, Eastwood, Susan Richard Horton, David Moher, Ingram Olkin, Roy Pitkin, Drummond Rennie, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Simel and Donna F. Stroup. 1996. “Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The Consort Statement.” Journal of the American Medical Association 276 (8): 637–639.Google Scholar

Bell, Mark S. and Miller, Nicholas L.. 2015. “Questioning the Effect of Nuclear Weapons on Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (1): 74–92.Google Scholar

Bellavance, François, Dionne, Georges and Lebeau, Martin. 2009. “The Value of a Statistical Life: A Meta-Analysis with a Mixed Effects Regression Model.” Journal of Health Economics 28 (2): 444–464.Google Scholar

Bellesiles, Michael A. 2000. Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Benjamini, Yoav and Hochberg, Yosef. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 57 (1): 289–300.Google Scholar

Benjamini, Yoav, Krieger, Abba M. and Yekutieli, Daniel. 2006. “Adaptive Linear Step-up Procedures That Control the False Discovery Rate.” Biometrika 93 (3): 491–507.Google Scholar

Benjamini, Yoav and Yekutieli, Daniel. 2001. “The Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing under Dependency.” The Annals of Statistics 29 (4): 1165–1188.Google Scholar

Bennet, Andrew. 2010. “Process Tracing and Casual Inference.” In H. E. Brady and D. Collier (eds), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew and Jeffrey, Checkel (eds). 2015. Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew. 2015. “Appendix.” Pp. 276–298 in Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey (eds), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Berge, Lars Ivar Oppedal, Bjorvatn, Kjetil, Galle, Simon, Miguel, Edward, Posner, Daniel N., Tungodden, Bertil and Zhang, Kelly. 2015. “How Strong Are Ethnic Preferences?” Working Paper 21715. National Bureau of Economic Research. www.nber.org/papers/w21715.Google Scholar

Berger, James and Berry, Donald. 1988. “Statistical Analysis and the Illusion of Objectivity.” American Scientist (March–April): 159–165.Google Scholar

Berger, Ulrich. 2009. “The Convergence of Fictitious Play in Games with Strategic Complementarities: A Comment.” IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20241/.Google Scholar

Berinsky, Adam J., Druckman, James N. and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2018. “Why Replications Do Not Fix the Reproducibility Crisis: A Model and Evidence from a Large-Scale Vignette Experiment.” Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, MIT.Google Scholar

Berkenkotter, Carol. 1995. “The Power and the Perils of Peer Review.” Rhetoric Review 13 (2): 245–248.Google Scholar

Bernanke, Ben S. 2004. “Editorial Statement.” American Economic Review 94 (1): 404–404.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Marianne, Kamenica, Emir and Pan, Jessica. 2015. “Gender Identity and Relative Income Within Households.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 130 (2): 571–614.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Marianne and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 991–1013.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bess, James L. 1998. “Contract Systems, Bureaucracies, and Faculty Motivation: The Probable Effects of a No-Tenure Policy.” Journal of Higher Education 69 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Bettinger, Eric P. and Long, Bridget Terry. 2005. “Do Faculty Serve as Role models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students.” American Economic Review 95 (2): 152–157.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bettis, Richard A., Helfat, Constance E. and Shaver, J. Myles. 2016. “The Necessity, Logic, and Forms of Replication.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (11): 2193–2203.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Bhattacharjee, Yudhijit. 2013. “Diederik Stapel’s Audacious Academic Fraud.” New York Times, April 26, 2013, sec. Magazine. www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Suzanne M., Sayer, Liana C., Milkie, Melissa A. and Robinson, John P.. 2012. “Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter?” Social Forces 91 (1): 55–63.Google Scholar

Bichsel, Jacqueline and McChesney, Jasper 2017. The Gender Pay Gap and the Representation of Women in Higher Education Administrative Positions: The Century So Far. Research report. CUPA-HR. February. www.cupahr.org/surveys/briefs.aspx.Google Scholar

Bierer, Barbara E., Crosas, Mercè and Pierce, Heather H.. 2017. “Data Authorship as an Incentive to Data Sharing.” New England Journal of Medicine 376 (17): 1684–1687.Google Scholar

Bishop, Libby. 2005. “Protecting Respondents and Enabling Data Sharing: Reply to Parry and Mauthner.” Sociology 39 (2): 333–336.Google Scholar

Bishop, Libby. 2009. “Ethical Sharing and Reuse of Qualitative Data.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 44 (3): 255–272.Google Scholar

Bishop, Libby. 2014. “Re-Using Qualitative Data: A Little Evidence, on-Going Issues and Modest Reflections.” Studia Socjologiczne 3: 167.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Robert T. and Lawrence, Janet H.. 1995. Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Robert T. and Havighurst, Robert J.. 1979. “Career Patterns of US Male Academic Social Scientists.” Higher Education 8 (5): 553–572.Google Scholar

Bland, J. Martin and Altman, Douglas G.. 1995. “Multiple Significance Tests: The Bonferroni Method.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 310 (6973): 170.Google Scholar

Blau, Francine D. and Kahn, Lawrence M.. 2000. “Gender Differences in Pay.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (4): 75–99.Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1933. Movies and Conduct. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Boas, Taylor. 2010. “Varieties of Electioneering: Success Contagion and Presidential Campaigns in Latin America.” World Politics 62 (4): 636–675.Google Scholar

Boas, Taylor. 2015. “Voting for Democracy: Campaign Effects in Chile’s Democratic Transition.” Latin American Politics and Society 57 (2): 67–90.Google Scholar

Boas, Taylor. 2016. Presidential Campaigns in Latin America: Electoral Strategies and Success Contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bohannon, John. 2016. “About 40% of Economics Experiments Fail Replication Survey.” Science, March. doi:10.1126/science.aaf4141.Google Scholar

Boix, Carles. 2015. Political Order and Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bontemps, Christophe and Mizon, Grayham E.. 2008. “Encompassing: Concepts and Implementation.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 70 (December): 721–750.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Chamboredon, Jean-Claude and Passeron, Jean-Claude. [1968] 1991. The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Borgatti, Stephen P., Everett, Martin G. and Johnson, Jeffrey C.. 2018. Analyzing Social Networks. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Borgman, Christine L. 2009. “The Digital Future Is Now: A Call to Action for the Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 3 (4). www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/4/000077/000077.html.Google Scholar

Borgman, Christine L. 2012. “The Conundrum of Sharing Research Data.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (6): 1059–1078.Google Scholar

Bornmann, Lutz, Schier, Hermann, Marx, Werner and Daniel, Hans-Dieter. 2012. “What Factors Determine Citation Counts of Publications in Chemistry Besides their Quality?” Journal of Informetrics 6 (1): 11–18.Google Scholar

Bornmann, Lutz and Daniel, Hans Dieter. 2008. “What Do Citation Counts Measure? A Review of Studies on Citing Behavior.” Journal of Documentation 64 (1): 45–80.Google Scholar

Bornmann, Lutz, Marx, Werner and Haunschild, Robin. 2016. “Calculating Journal Rankings: Peer Review, Bibliometrics, and Alternative Metrics?” Pp. 42–55 in Ciaran Sugre and Serfika Mertkan (eds), Publishing and the Academic World: Passion, Purpose, and Possible Futures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Borsuk, Robyn M., Budden, Amber E., Leimu, Roosa, Aarssen, Lonnie W. and Lortie, Christopher J.. 2009. “The Influence of Author Gender, National Language and Number of Authors on Citation Rate in Ecology.” Open Ecology Journal 2: 25–28.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Chamboredon, Jean-Claude and Claude-Passeron, Jean. 1991. The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Boutron, Isabelle, Moher, David, Altman, Douglas G., Schulz, Kenneth F. and Ravaud, Philippe. 2008. “Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration.” Annals of Internal Medicine 148 (4): 295–309.Google Scholar

Bowers, Jake. 2011. “Six Steps to a Better Relationship with Your Future Self.” The Political Methodologist 18 (2): 2–8.Google Scholar

Bowers, Jake, Jonathan Nagler, John Gerring, Alan Jacobs, Don Green and Macartan Humphreys. 2015. “A Proposal for a Political Science Registry.” Available at http://blogs.bu.edu/jgerring/files/2015/09/Aproposal-foraPoliticalScienceRegistry.pdf.Google Scholar

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Cunha, Raphael C., Varbanov, Roumen A., Hoh, Yee Shwen, Knisley, Margaret L. and Holmes, Mary Alice. 2015. “Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender.” PloS ONE, 10, e0143093.Google Scholar

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry and Collier, David (eds). 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brady, Henry E. and David, Collier (eds). 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Brajer, Victor and Gill, Andrew. 2010. “Yakity-Yak: Who Talks Back? An Email Experiment.” Social Science Quarterly 91 (4): 1007–1024.Google Scholar

Brandt, Mark J., IJzerman, Hans, Dijksterhuis, Ap, Farach, Frank J., Geller, Jason, Giner-Sorolla, Roger, Grange, James A., Perugini, Marco, Spies, Jeffrey R. and Veer, Anna van ‘t. 2014. “The Replication Recipe: What Makes for a Convincing Replication?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 50: 217–224.Google Scholar

Breuer, Peter T. and Bowen, Jonathan P.. 2014. “Empirical Patterns in Google Scholar Citation Counts.” ArXiv:1401.1861 [Cs], April, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSE.2014.55.Google Scholar

Breznau, Nate. 2015. “The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza.” Sociological Science 2: 420–441.Google Scholar

Broad, William and Wade, Nicholas. 1983. Betrayers of the Truth. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Brodeur, Abel, Le, Mathias, Sangnier, Marc and Zylberberg, Yanos. 2016. “Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar

Broockman, David, Kalla, Joshua and Aranow, Peter. 2015. “Irregularities in LaCour (2014).” UC Berkeley. http://stanford.edu/~dbroock/broockman_kalla_aronow_lg_irregularities.pdf.Google Scholar

Brooks, Clem. 2014. “Nations, Classes, and the Politics of Professors: A Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 82–108 in Gross, Neil and Simmons, Solon (eds), Professors and Their Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, Clem and Manza, Jeff. 2006. “Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies.” American Sociological Review 71 (3): 474–494.Google Scholar

Broom, Alex, Cheshire, Lynda and Emmison, Michael. 2009. “Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing.” Sociology 43 (6): 1163–1180.Google Scholar

Brown, Nadia E. 2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Robert. 1984. The Nature of Social Laws: Machiavelli to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brzezinski, Michal. 2015. “Power Laws in Citation Distributions: Evidence from Scopus.” Scientometrics 103 (1): 213–228.Google Scholar

Buckley, William. 1951. God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of Academic Freedom. Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Gleditsch, Nils Petter, James, Patrick, King, Gary, Metelits, Claire, Ray, James Lee, Russett, Bruce, Strand, Havard and Valeriano, Brandon. 2003. “Symposium on Replication in International Studies Research.” International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 72–107.Google Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M. and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Burlig, Fiona. 2018. “Improving Transparency in Observational Social Science Research: A Pre-Analysis Plan Approach.” Economics Letters 168: 56–60.Google Scholar

Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David. 2000. “Aid, Policies, and Growth.” American Economic Review 90 (4): 847–868.Google Scholar

Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David. 2004. “Aid, Policies, and Growth: Reply.” American Economic Review 94 (3): 781–784.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bush, Tony. 2016. “Understanding the Peer-Review Process: Reject, Revise, Resubmit.” Pp. 90–98 in Sugre, Ciaran and Mertkan, Serfika (eds), Publishing and the Academic World: Passion, Purpose, and Possible Futures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, Courtney and Currier, Brett. 2017. “You Can’t Replicate What You Can’t Find: Data Preservation Policies in Economic Journals.” presented at the IASSIST 2017, Lawrence, Kansas, May 25. http://iassist2017.org/program/s107.html.Google Scholar

Callaham, Michael, Wears, Robert L. and Weber, Ellen. 2002. “Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals.” Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (21): 2847–2850.Google Scholar

Calvert, Melanie, Blazeby, Jane, Altman, Douglas G., Dennis A. Revicki, David Moher and Michael D. Brundage. 2013. “Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials: The Consort pro Extension.” Journal of the American Medical Association 309 (8): 814–822.Google Scholar

Camerer, Colin F., Dreber, Anna, Forsell, Eskil, Ho, Teck-Hua, Huber, Jürgen, Johannesson, Magnus, Kirchler, Michael et al. 2016. “Evaluating Replicability of Laboratory Experiments in Economics.” Science 351 (6280): 1433–1436.Google Scholar

Camfield, Laura and Palmer-Jones, Richard. 2013. “Three ‘Rs’ of Econometrics: Repetition, Reproduction and Replication.” Journal of Development Studies 49 (12): 1607–1614.Google Scholar

Camic, Charles. 2007. “On Edge: Sociology During the Great Depression and the New Deal.” Pp. 225–280 in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Sociology in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Camic, Charles and Gross, Neil. 2001. “The New Sociology of Ideas.” Pp. 236–249 in Judith Blau (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Camic, Charles, Neil, Gross and Michèle, Lamont (eds). 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Camic, Charles, Neil, Gross and Michèle, Lamont 2011. “Introduction: The Study of Social Knowledge Making.” Pp. 1–40 in Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil and Lamont, Michèle (eds), Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Donald T. 1979. “Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change.” Evaluation and Program Planning 2 (1): 67–90.Google Scholar

Campbell, John and Pedersen, Ove. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Marion K., Elbourne, Diana R. and Altman, Douglas G.. 2004. “CONSORT Statement: Extension to Cluster Randomised Trials.” British Medical Journal 328 (7441): 702–708.Google Scholar

Campbell, Marion K., Elbourne, Diana R. and Altman, Douglas G.. 2012. “Consort 2010 Statement: Extension to Cluster Randomised Trials.” British Medical Journal 345: e5661.Google Scholar

Campolieti, Michele, Gunderson, Morley and Riddell, Chris. 2006. “Minimum Wage Impacts from a Prespecified Research Design: Canada 1981–1997.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 45 (2): 195–216.Google Scholar

Card, David. 1992a. “Do Minimum Wages Reduce Employment? A Case Study of California, 1987–89.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46 (1): 38–54.Google Scholar

Card, David. 1992b. “Using Regional Variation in Wages to Measure the Effects of the Federal Minimum Wage.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46 (1): 22–37.Google Scholar

Card, David and Krueger, Alan B. 1994. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.” American Economic Review 84 (4): 772–793.Google Scholar

Card, David and Krueger, Alan B. 1995. “Time-Series Minimum-Wage Studies: A Meta-Analysis.” American Economic Review 85 (2): 238–243.Google Scholar

Card, David and Krueger, Alan B. 2000. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Reply.” American Economic Review 90 (5): 1397–1420.Google Scholar

Card, David, Chetty, Raj, Feldstein, Martin and Saez, Emmanuel. 2010. “Expanding Access to Administrative Data for Research in the United States.” 112. NSF SBE 2020. www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020/2020_pdfs/Card_David_112.pdf.Google Scholar

Card, David and DellaVigna, S.. 2014. “Page Limits on Economics Articles: Evidence from Two Journals.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (3): 149–167.Google Scholar

Carey, Benedict. 2011. “Noted Dutch Psychologist, Stapel, Accused of Research Fraud.” New York Times, November 2, sec. Health/Research. www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/health/research/noted-dutch-psychologist-stapel-accused-of-research-fraud.html.Google Scholar

Carr, Phyllis L., Gunn, Christine M., Kaplan, Samantha A., Raj, Anita and Freund, Karen M. 2015. “Inadequate Progress for Women in Academic Medicine: Findings from the National Faculty Study.” Journal of Women’s Health 24 (3): 190–199.Google Scholar

Carsey, Thomas M. 2014. “Making DA-RT a Reality.” PS, Political Science and Politics 47 (1): 72–77.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Casey, Katherine, Glennerster, Rachel and Miguel, Edward. 2012. “Reshaping Institutions: Evidence on Aid Impacts Using a Preanalysis Plan.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (4): 1755–1812.Google Scholar

Casselman, Ben. 2012. “Economists Set Rules on Ethics.” Wall Street Journal, January 9, sec. Careers. www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203436904577148940410667970.Google Scholar

Catalini, Christian, Lacetera, Nicola and Oettl, Alexander. 2015. “The Incidence and Role of Negative Citations in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (45): 13823–13826.Google Scholar

Caverley, Jonathan D. 2009/2010. “The Myth of Military Myopia: Democracy, Small Wars, and Vietnam.” International Security 34 (Winter): 119–157.Google Scholar

Caverley, Jonathan D. 2010/2011. “Explaining U.S. Military Strategy in Vietnam: Thinking Clearly About Causation.” International Security 35 (Winter): 124–143.Google Scholar

Centeno, Miguel. 2002. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation State in Latin America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, Alan F. 2013. What is This Thing Called Science? New York: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Chambers, Christopher. 2013. “Registered Reports: A New Publishing Initative at Cortex.” Cortex 49: 609–610.Google Scholar

Chambers, Christopher, Feredoes, Eva, Muthukumaraswamy, Suresh D. and Etchells, Peter J.. 2014. “Instead of ‘Playing the Game’ It Is Time to Change the Rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and Beyond.” AIMS Environmental Science 1 (1): 4–17.Google Scholar

Chang, Andrew C. and Li, Phillip. 2015. “Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say ‘Usually Not.’” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015–83. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US).Google Scholar

Chapman, Colin D., Christian Benedict and Helgi B. Schiöth. 2018. “Experimenter Gender and Replicability in Science.” Science Advances 4 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar

Chen, Jihui, Kim, Myongjin and Liu, Qihong. 2017. “Gender Gap in Tenure and Promotion: Evidence from the Economics Ph.D. Class of 2008.” Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2880240 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2880240.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chenault, Larry A. 1984. “A Note on the Stability Limitations in ‘A Stable Price Adjustment Process.’” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99 (2): 385.Google Scholar

Chernoff, Fred. 2014. Explanation and Progress in Security Studies: Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2009. “Opening Remarks.” Pp. 13–43 in Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo et al. (eds), Of Minds and Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Choo, Hae Yeon and Ferree., Myra Marx 2010. “Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research: A Critical Analysis of Inclusions, Interactions, and Institutions in the Study of Inequalities.” Sociological Theory 28 (2): 129–149.Google Scholar

Christensen, Björn and Christensen, Sören. 2014. “Are Female Hurricanes Really Deadlier than Male Hurricanes?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (34): E3497–E3498.Google Scholar

Christensen, Darin, Hartman, Alexandra and Samii, Cyrus. 2018. “Property Rights, Investment, and Land Grabs: An Institutional Natural Experiment in Liberia.” Unpublished working paper. Available online at https://darinchristensen.com/publication/liberia-tenure/.Google Scholar

Christensen, Garret and Miguel, Edward. 2018. “Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research.” Journal of Economic Literature 56 (3): 920–980.Google Scholar

Ciccone, Antonio. 2011. “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: A Comment.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3 (4): 215–227.Google Scholar

Clemens, Michael. 2017. “The Meaning of Failed Replications: A Review and Proposal.” Journal of Economic Surveys 31(February): 326–342.Google Scholar

Clements, Kenneth W. and Wang, Patricia. 2003. “Who Cites What?” Economic Record 79 (245): 229–244.Google Scholar

Coffman, Lucas C. and Niederle, Muriel. 2015. “Pre-Analysis Plans have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications are Feasible.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 81–97.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jacob. 1994. “The Earth is Round (p < .05).” American Psychologist 49: 997–1003.Google Scholar

Cohen-Cole, Ethan, Durlauf, Steven, Fagan, Jeffrey and Nagin, Daniel. 2009. “Model Uncertainty and the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment.” American Law and Economics Review 11 (2): 335–369.Google Scholar

Cole, Stephen. 1994. “Why Sociology Doesn’t Make Progress like the Natural Sciences.” Sociological Forum 9: 133–154.Google Scholar

Coleman, James. 1958. Nigeria: Background to Nationalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, James, Katz, Elihu and Menzel, Herbert. 1966. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Colgan, Jeff. 2017. “Gender Bias in International Relations Graduate Education? New Evidence from Syllabi.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 456–460.Google Scholar

Colgrove, James. 2006. “The Ethics and Politics of Compulsory HPV Vaccination.” The New England Journal of Medicine 355: 2389–2391.Google Scholar

Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS:Political Science and Politics 44 (4): 823–830.Google Scholar

Collier, David, Brady, Henry and Seawright, Jason. 2004. “Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology.” Pp. 229–266 in Brady, Henry and Collier, David (eds), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Collier, David and Mahon, James E., Jr. 1993. “Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 87 (4): 845–855.Google Scholar

Collier, Ruth Berins and Mahoney, James. 1997. “Adding Collective Actors to Collective Outcomes: Labor and Recent Democratization in South America and Southern Europe.” Comparative Politics 29 (3): 285–303.Google Scholar

Collins, Harry M. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Collins, Harry M. 1991. “The Meaning of Replication and the Science of Economics.” History of Political Economy 23: 123–142.Google Scholar

Collins, Harry M. 1998. “The Meaning of Data: Open and Closed Evidential Cultures in the Search for Gravitational Waves.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (2): 293–338.Google Scholar

Collins, Randall. 1994. “Why the Social Sciences Won’t Become High-Consensus, Rapid-Discovery Science.” Sociological Forum 9 (2): 155–177.Google Scholar

Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1988. “The Role of Social Groups in Political Thinking.” British Journal of Political Science 51–76.Google Scholar

Converse, Jean. 1987. Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence 1890–1960. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael. 2012. Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, Steven, Hicken, Allen, Kroenig, Matthew, Lindberg, Staffan I., McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Semetko, Holli A., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey and Teorell, Jan. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2, June): 247–267.Google Scholar

Corbyn, Zoe. 2008. “Unpaid Peer Review is worth £1.9bn.” Times Higher Education, May 29.Google Scholar

“Correspondence: David H. Autor and Bruno S. Frey.” 2011. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3): 239–240.Google Scholar

Corti, Louise and Gregory, Arofan. 2011. “CAQDAS Comparability. What About CAQDAS Data Exchange?” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12 (1). www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1634.Google Scholar

Corti, Louise, Eynden, Veerle van den, Bishop, Libby and Woollard, Matthew. 2014. Managing and Sharing Research Data: A Guide to Good Practice. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Costas, Rodrigo, Zahedi, Zohreh and Wouters, Paul. 2014. “How Well Developed are Altmetrics? A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of the Presence of ‘Alternative Metrics’ in Scientific Publications.” Scientometrics 101 (2): 1491–1513.Google Scholar

Costas, Rodrigo, Zahedi, Zohreh and Wouters, Paul. 2015. “Do ‘Altmetrics’ Correlate with Citations? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66: 2003–2019.Google Scholar

Cowen, Tyler and Tabarrok, Alex. 2016. “A Skeptical View of the National Science Foundation’s Role in Economic Research.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (3): 235–248.Google Scholar

Cox, Richard. 1961. The Algebra of Probable Inference. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. “Demarginalizing The Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forces, 139–168Google Scholar

Cronin, Blaise. 1984. The Citation Process. The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication. London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar

Cronin, Blaise and Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (eds). 2014. Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cumming, Geoff. 2008. “Replication and p Intervals: P Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 3: 286–300.Google Scholar

Cumming, Geoff and Maillardet, Robert. 2006. “Confidence Intervals and Replication: Where Will the Next Mean Fall?” Psychological Methods 11: 217–227.Google Scholar

Cumming, Geoff, Williams, Jennifer and , Fiona Fidler. 2004. “Replication, and Researchers’ Understanding of Confidence Intervals and Standard Error Bars.” Understanding Statistics 3: 299–311.Google Scholar

Dahl Rasmussen, Ole, Malchow-Møller, Nikolaj and Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck. 2011. “Walking the Talk: The Need for a Trial Registry for Development Interventions.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 3 (4): 502–519.Google Scholar

Dal-Ré, Rafael, Ioannidis, John P., Bracken, Michael B., Buffler, Patricia A., Chan, An-Wen, Franco, Eduardo L., Vecchia, Carlo La and Weiderpass, Elisabete. 2014. “Making Prospective Registration of Observational Research a Reality.” Science Translational Medicine 6 (224): 224cm1–224cm1.Google Scholar

David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75 (2): 332–337.Google Scholar

Davis, Graham A. 2013. “Replicating Sachs and Warner’s Working Papers on the Resource Curse.” Journal of Development Studies 49 (12): 1615–1630.Google Scholar

Davis, James. 1958. “Review of Robert Merton et al, The Student-Physician,” American Journal of Sociology 63 (4): 445–446.Google Scholar

De Angelis, Catherine, Drazen, Jeffrey M., Frizelle, Frank A., Haug, Charlotte, Hoey, John, Horton, Richard, Kotzin, Sheldon et al. 2004. “Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.” New England Journal of Medicine 351 (12): 1250–1251.Google Scholar

Deaton, Angus. 2010. “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 48 (2): 424–455.Google Scholar

DeCoursey, Tom. 2006. “Perspective: The Pros and Cons of Open Peer Review.” Nature. www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04991.html.Google Scholar

Deere, Donald, Murphy, Kevin M. and Welch, Finis. 1995. “Employment and the 1990–1991 Minimum-Wage Hike.” American Economic Review 85 (2): 232–237.Google Scholar

Dekel, Eddie, Levine, David, Meghir, Costas, Newey, Whitney and Postlewaite, Andrew. 2006. “Report of the Editors.” Econometrica 74 (1): 307–310.Google Scholar

Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio, Robinson-García, Nicolas and Torres-Salinas, Daniel. 2014. “The Google Scholar Experiment: How to Index False Papers and Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (3): 446–454.Google Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella and Keating, Michael (eds). 2008. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DellaVigna, Stefano and Pope, Devin. 2016. “Predicting Experimental Results: Who Knows What?” Working Paper 22566. National Bureau of Economic Research. www.nber.org/papers/w22566.Google Scholar

DeLong, J. Bradford and Lang, Kevin. 1992. “Are All Economic Hypotheses False?” Journal of Political Economy 100 (6): 1257–1272.Google Scholar

Denton, Frank T. 1985. “Data Mining as an Industry.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (1): 124–127.Google Scholar

DeRigne, LeaAnne and Porterfield, Shirley L.. 2017. “Employment Change Among Married Parents of Children With Special Health Care Needs.” Journal of Family Issues 38 (5): 579–606.Google Scholar

Desch, Michael C. 2008. Power and Military Effectiveness: The Fallacy of Democratic Triumphalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Dessler, David. 1991. “Beyond Correlations: Toward a Causal Theory of War.” International Studies Quarterly 35 (3): 337–355.Google Scholar

Dewald, William G., Thursby, Jerry G and Anderson, Richard G.. 1986. “Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project.” American Economic Review 76 (4): 587–603.Google Scholar

Dezhbakhsh, Hashem, Rubin, Paul H. and Shepherd, Joanna M. 2003. “Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel Data.” American Law and Economics Review 5 (2): 344–376.Google Scholar

Diament, Sean M., Howat, Adam J and Lacombe, Matthew J.. 2018. “Gender Representation in the American Politics Canon: An Analysis of Core Graduate Syllabi.” PS: Political Science and Politics: 1–6.Google Scholar

Didegah, Fereshteh and Thelwall, Mike. 2013. “Determinants of Research Citation Impact in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (5): 1055–1064.Google Scholar

Dijksterhuis, Ap 2013. “Replication Crisis or Crisis in Replication A Reinterpretation of Shanks et al.” Reader comment. www.plosone.org/annotation/listThread.action?root=64751.Google Scholar

Dijksterhuis, Ap, Spears, Russell and Lepinasse, Vincent. 2001. “Reflecting and Deflecting Stereotypes: Assimilation and Contrast in Impression Formation and Automatic Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37: 286–299.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W., Powell (eds). 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dimitrova, Daniela V. and Bugeja, Michael. 2007. “The Half-Life of Internet References Cited in Communication Journals.” New Media and Society 9 (5): 811–826.CrossRef Google Scholar

Djupe, Paul, Smith, Amy Erica and Sokhey, Anand, 2018. “Explaining Gender in the Journals: How Submission Practices Affect Publication Patterns in Political Science.” Paper presented at the Visions in Methodology Conference, Ohio State University, May 7–9.Google Scholar

Dollard, John. 1937. Caste and Class in a Southern Town. New edition. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Donohue, John J. and Levitt, Steven D.. 2001. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2): 379.Google Scholar

Donohue, John J. and Levitt, Steven D.. 2008. “Measurement Error, Legalized Abortion, and the Decline in Crime: A Response to Foote and Goetz (Christopher L, Foote, Christopher F. Goetz) (Report).” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 425.Google Scholar

Donohue, John J. and Wolfers, Justin. 2005. “Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate.” Stanford Law Review 58 (3): 791–845.Google Scholar

DORA. 2012. “San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.” 2012. https://sfdora.org/read/.Google Scholar

Doucet, Andrea and Mauthner, Natasha S.. 2008. “What Can Be Known and How? Narrated Subjects and the Listening Guide.” Qualitative Research 8 (3): 399–409.Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, Chris. 2005. “Publication Bias in the Economic Freedom and Economic Growth Literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 367–387.Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, Chris and Stanley, T. D.. 2013. “Are All Economic Facts Greatly Exaggerated? Theory Competition and Selectivity.” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (2): 316–339.Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, Chris, Stanley, T. D. and Giles, Margaret. 2012. “Are Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life Exaggerated?” Journal of Health Economics 31 (1): 197–206.Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, Christos and Laroche, Patrice. 2003. “What Do Unions Do to Productivity? A Meta-Analysis.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 42 (4): 650–691.Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, Hristos, Ioannidis, John P. and Stanley, Tom. 2017. “The Power of Bias in Economics.” Economic Journal 127 (October): F236–F265.Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, Hristos and Stanley, T. D.. 2009. “Publication Selection Bias in Minimum-Wage Research? A Meta-Regression Analysis.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 47 (2): 406–428.Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, Hristos, Stanley, T. D. and Kip Viscusi, W.. 2014. “Publication Selection and the Income Elasticity of the Value of a Statistical Life.” Journal of Health Economics 33 (January): 67–75.Google Scholar

Douven, Igor. 2011. “Abduction” and “Supplement to Abduction: Peirce on Abduction,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/.Google Scholar

Drazen, Jeffrey M. 2016. “Data Sharing and the Journal.” New England Journal of Medicine 374 (19): e24.Google Scholar

Dreber, Anna, Pfeiffer, Thomas, Almenberg, Johan, Isaksson, Siri, Wilson, Brad, Chen, Yiling, Nosek, Brian A. and Johannesson, Magnus. 2015. “Using Prediction Markets to Estimate the Reproducibility of Scientific Research.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, November, 201516179. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516179112.Google Scholar

Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P (eds). 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H. and Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 627–635.Google Scholar

Drukker, David M. and Wiggins, Vince. 2004. “Verifying the Solution from a Nonlinear Solver: A Case Study: Comment.” American Economic Review 94 (1): 397–399.Google Scholar

Du Bois, W. E. B. 1937. “Southern Trauma: Review of Caste and Class in a Southern Town by John Dollard.” North Georgia Review 2: 9–10.Google Scholar

Duarte, José et al. 2015. “Political Diversity Will Improve Psychological Science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1–58.Google Scholar

Dube, Arindrajit, William Lester, T. and Reich, Michael. 2010. “Minimum Wage Effects Across State Borders: Estimates Using Contiguous Counties.” Review of Economics and Statistics 92 (4): 945–964.Google Scholar

Duflo, Esther, Glennerster, Rachel and Kremer, Michael. 2007. “Chapter 61 Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit.” Pp. 3895–3962 in Paul Schultz, T. and Strauss, John A. (eds), Handbook of Development Economics. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Dumont, Clayton W. 2008. The Promise of Poststructuralist Sociology: Marginalized Peoples and the Problem of Knowledge. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, Patrick. 2014. “Poor Citation Practices are a Form of Academic Self-Harm in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” Blog post. https://medium.com/advice-and-help-in-authoring-a-phd-or-non-fiction/poor-citation-practices-are-a-form-of-academic-self-harm-in-the-humanities-and-social-sciences-2cddf250b3c2#.6vnf69w17.Google Scholar

Dunning, Thad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dunning, Thad. 2016. “Transparency, Replication, and Cumulative Learning: What Experiments Alone Cannot Achieve.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 541–563.Google Scholar

Duvendack, Maren and Palmer-Jones, Richard. 2013. “Replication of Quantitative Work in Development Studies: Experiences and Suggestions.” Progress in Development Studies 13 (4): 307–322.CrossRef Google Scholar

Duvendack, Maren, Palmer-Jones, Richard and Reed, Robert W. 2015. “Replications in Economics: A Progress Report.” Economic Journal Watch 12 (2): 164–191.Google Scholar

Dwork, Cynthia and Smith, Adam. 2010. “Differential Privacy for Statistics: What We Know and What We Want to Learn.” Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality 1 (2). http://repository.cmu.edu/jpc/vol1/iss2/2.Google Scholar

Easley, Richard W., Madden, Charles S. and Dunn, Mark G. 2000. “Conducting Marketing Science: The Role of Replication in the Research Process.” Journal of Business Research 48 (1): 83–92.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, Phillipa J., Gopalan, Ramana, Berlin, Jesse A. and Matthews, David R.. 1991. “Publication Bias in Clinical Research.” The Lancet, originally published as 337 (8746): 867–872.Google Scholar

Easterly, William, Levine, Ross and Roodman, David. 2004. “Aid, Policies, and Growth: Comment.” American Economic Review 94 (3): 774–780.Google Scholar

Eble, Alex, Boone, Peter and Elbourne, Diana. 2014. “On Minimizing the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Economics.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2272141. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2272141.Google Scholar

Eden, Dov. 2002. “From the Editors: Replication, Meta-Analysis, Scientific Progress, and AMJ’s Publication Policy.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 841–846.Google Scholar

Egger, Matthias, Davey-Smith, George and Altman, Douglas G (eds). 2001. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. London: BMJ Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Eich, Eric. 2014. “Business Not as Usual.” Psychological Science 25 (1): 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512465.Google Scholar

Eidlin, Fred. 1983. “Area Studies and/or Social Science: Contextually-Limited Generalizations versus General Laws.” Pp. 199–216 in Eidlin, Fred (ed.), Constitutional Democracy: Essays in Comparative Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Elkana, Yehuda, Lederberg, Joshua, Merton, Robert K., Thackray, Arnold and Zuckerman, Harriet. 1978. Towards a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ellison, Glenn. 2002. “The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process.” Journal of Political Economy 110 (5): 947–993.Google Scholar

Elm, Erik von, Altman, Douglas G., Egger, Matthias, Pocock, Stuart J., Gøtzsche, Peter C. and Vandenbroucke, Jan P.. 2007. “The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies.” Preventive Medicine 45 (4): 247–251.Google Scholar

Elman, Colin and Kapiszewski, Diana. 2014. “Data Access and Research Transparency in the Qualitative Tradition.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (1): 43–47.Google Scholar

Ember, Carol and Hanisch, Robert. 2013. “Sustaining Domain Repositories for Digital Data: A White Paper, December 11.” doi:10.3886/SustainingDomainRepositoriesDigitalData.Google Scholar

Enders, Walter and Hoover, Gary A.. 2004. “Whose Line Is It? Plagiarism in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 42 (2): 487–493.Google Scholar

Enders, Walter and Hoover, Gary A.. 2006. “Plagiarism in the Economics Profession: A Survey.” Challenge 49 (5): 92–107.Google Scholar

Epidemiology. 2010. “The Registration of Observational Studies – When Metaphors Go Bad.” Epidemiology, July, 1. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181eafbcf.Google Scholar

Erikson, Martin G. and Erlandson, Peter. 2014. “A Taxonomy of Motives to Cite.” Social Studies of Science 44 (4): 625–637.Google Scholar

Ertman, Thomas. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Sauder, Michael. 2016. Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Etz, Alexander and Vandekerckhove, Joachim. 2016. “A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.” PLoS ONE 11 (2): e0149794.Google Scholar

Evangelou, Evangelos, Trikalinos, Thomas A. and Ioannidis, John P.. 2005. “Unavailability of Online Supplementary Scientific Information from Articles Published in Major Journals.” The FASEB Journal 19 (14): 1943–1944.Google Scholar

Everett, Jim A. C. and Earp, Brian D.. 2016. “A Tragedy of the (Academic) Commons: Interpreting the Replication Crises in Psychology as a Social Dilemma for Early-Career Researchers.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1152.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha. 2010. “Business Power and Tax Reform: Taxing Income and Profits in Chile and Argentina.” Latin American Politics and Society 52 (2): 37–71.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha. 2011. “Business Power and Protest: Argentina’s Agricultural Producers Protest in Comparative Context.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46 (4): 424–453.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha. 2013. “Going Where the Money Is: Strategies for Taxing Economic Elites in Unequal Democracies.” World Development 47: 42–57.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha. 2015. Private Wealth and Public Revenue in Latin America: Business Power and Tax Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2015. “Bayesian Probability: The Logic of (Political) Science: Opportunities, Caveats and Guidelines.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 3–6, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2017. “Explicit Bayesian Analysis for Process Tracing: Guidelines, Opportunities, and Caveats.” Political Analysis 25 (3): 363–380.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2018. “A Bayesian Perspective on Case Selection.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2019. “The Bayesian Foundations of Iterative Research in Qualitative Social Science: A Dialogue with the Data.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (1): 154–167.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Charman, Andrew. 2020. Social Inquiry and Bayesian Inference: Rethinking Qualitative Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fairfield, Tasha and Garay, Candelaria. 2017. “Redistribution under the Right in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Organized Actors in Policymaking,” Comparative Political Studies 50 (14): 1871–1906.Google Scholar

Falagas, Matthew E., Zarkali, Angeliki, Karageorgopoulos, Drosos E., Bardakas, Vangelis and Mavros, Michael N.. 2013. “The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals.” PLoS ONE 8 (2): e49476.Google Scholar

Fanelli, Daniele. 2009. “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data.” PLoS ONE 4 (5): e5738.Google Scholar

Fanelli, Daniele. 2013. “Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign.” PLoS Medicine 10 (12): e1001563.Google Scholar

Fang, Ferric C. and Casadevall, Arturo. 2011. “Retracted Science and the Retraction Index.” Infection and Immunity 79 (10): 3855–3859.Google Scholar

Fann, Kuang Tih. 1970. Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Faye, Cathy. 2012. “American Social Psychology: Examining the Contours of the 1970s Crisis.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2): 514–521.Google Scholar

Feak, Christine B. and Swales, John M.. 2009. Telling a Research Story: Writing a Literature Review. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Feigenbaum, Susan and Levy, David M.. 1993. “The Market for (Ir)reproducible Econometrics.” Social Epistemology 7: 215–232.Google Scholar

Feldstein, Martin. 1974. “Social Security, Induced Retirement, and Aggregate Capital Accumulation.” Journal of Political Economy 82 (5): 905–926.Google Scholar

Feldstein, Martin. “Social Security and Private Saving: Reply.” Journal of Political Economy 90 (3): 630–642.Google Scholar

Ferber, Marianne A. and Brün, Michael. 2011. “The Gender Gap in Citations: Does It Persist?” Feminist Economics 17 (1): 151–158.Google Scholar

Ferree, Myra Marx, Khan, Shamus and Morimoto, Shauna. 2007. “Assessing the Feminist Revolution: The Presence and Absence of Gender in Theory and Practice.” Pp. 438–479 in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Sociology in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul. 1993. Against Method. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Fielding, Nigel. 2004. “Getting the Most from Archived Qualitative Data: Epistemological, Practical and Professional Obstacles.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7 (1): 97–104.Google Scholar

Fienberg, Stephen E., Martin, Margaret E. and Straf, Miron L. (eds). 1985. Sharing Research Data. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Findley, Michael G., Jensen, Nathan M., Malesky, Edmund J and Pepinsky, Thomas B.. 2016. “Can Results-Free Review Reduce Publication Bias? The Results and Implications of a Pilot Study.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (13): 1667–1703.Google Scholar

Fink, Günther, McConnell, Margaret and Vollmer, Sebastian. 2014. “Testing for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Experimental Data: False Discovery Risks and Correction Procedures.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6 (1): 44–57.Google Scholar

Finkel, Eli, J., Eastwick, Paul W. and Reis, Harry T.. 2015. “Best Research Practices in Psychology: Illustrating Epistemological and Pragmatic Considerations with the Case of Relationship Science.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 108 (2): 275–297.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, Amy, Taubman, Sarah, Wright, Bill, Bernstein, Mira, Gruber, Jonathan, Newhouse, Joseph P., Allen, Heidi and Baicker, Katherine. 2012. “The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from the First Year.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3): 1057–1106.Google Scholar

Finney, David. 1997. “The Responsible Referee.” Biometrics 53 (2): 715–719.Google Scholar

Fleischmann, Martin and Pons, Stanley. 1989. “Electrochemically Induced Nuclear Fusion of Deuterium.” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 261 (2): 301–308.Google Scholar

Folbre, Nancy 1982. “Exploitation Comes Home: A Critique of the Marxian Theory of Family Labor.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6 (4): 317–329.Google Scholar

Food and Drug Administration. 1998. “Guidance for Industry: E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials.” www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidanecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm073137.pdf.Google Scholar

Food and Drug Administration. n.d. “E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials.” Guidance for Industry. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration. www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm073137.pdf.Google Scholar

Foote, Christopher L. and Goetz, Christopher F.. 2008. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime: Comment (Report).” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 407.Google Scholar

Forscher, Bernard. 1965. “Rules for Referees.” Science 150 (3694): 319–321.Google Scholar

Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion and Babb, Sarah. 2002. “The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 108: 533–579.Google Scholar

Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fourcade, Marion and Healy, Kieran. 2016. “Seeing Like a Market.” Socio-Economic Review (December): 9–29.Google Scholar

Fourcade, Marion and Healy, Kieran. 2017. “Categories All the Way Down.” Historical Social Research 42 (1): 286–296.Google Scholar

Fowler, Linda L. 1995. “Replication as Regulation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 478–481.Google Scholar

Fox, Charles W., Timothy Paine, C. E. and Sauterey, Boris. 2016. “Citations Increase with Manuscript Length, Author Number, and References Cited in Ecology Journals.” Ecology and Evolution 6 (21): 7717–7726.Google Scholar

Franco, Annie, Malhotra, Neil and Simonovits, Gabor. 2014. “Publication Bias in the Social Sciences: Unlocking the File Drawer.” Science 345 (6203): 1502–1505.Google Scholar

Frank, Michael C. and Saxe, Rebecca. 2012. “Teaching Replication.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 600–604.Google Scholar

Freese, Jeremy. 2007a. “Overcoming Objections to Open-Source Social Science.” Sociological Methods and Research 36 (2): 220–226.Google Scholar

Freese, Jeremy. 2007b. “Replication Standards for Quantitative Social Science: Why Not Sociology?” Sociological Methods and Research 36 (2): 153–172.Google Scholar

Freese, Jeremy and Peterson, David. 2016. “The Emergence of Forensic Objectivity.” osf.io/2ft8x.Google Scholar

Freese, Jeremy and Peterson, David. 2017. “Replication in Social Science.” Annual Review of Sociology 43 (1): 147–165.Google Scholar

Freese, Jeremy and Peterson, David. 2018. “The Emergence of Statistical Objectivity.” Sociological Theory 36 (3): 289–313.Google Scholar

Freese, Jeremy and Powell, Brian. 2001. “Commentary and Debate: Making Love Out of Nothing at All? Null Findings and the Trivers-Willard Hypothesis.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (6): 1776–1788.Google Scholar

Frey, René L., Frey, Bruno S and Eichenberger, Reiner. 1999. “A Case of Plagiarism.” Kyklos 52 (3): 311.Google Scholar

Frickel, Scott. 2008. “On Missing New Orleans: Lost Knowledge and Knowledge Gaps in an Urban Hazardscape.” Environmental History 13: 643–650.Google Scholar

Frickel, Scott and Gross, Neil. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review 70 (2): 204–232.Google Scholar

Fried, Eiko. 2018. “7 Sternberg Papers: 351 References, 161 Self-Citations.” March 29, 2018. http://eiko-fried.com/sternberg-selfcitations/.Google Scholar

Frijters, Paul and Torgler, Benno. 2016. “Improving the Peer Review Process: A Proposed Market System.” Discussion paper No. 9894, IZA/The Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar

Fuess, Scott M., Jr. 1996. “On Replication in Business and Economics Research: The QJBE Case.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 35 (2): 3–13.Google Scholar

Gaddis, John Lewis. 1989. The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Galbraith, Rex F. 1988. “A Note on Graphical Presentation of Estimated Odds Ratios from Several Clinical Trials.” Statistics in Medicine 7 (8): 889–894.Google Scholar

Galvan, Jose L. and Galvan, Melisa C.. 2017. Writing Literature Reviews: A guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ganimian, Alejandro. 2014. “Pre-Analysis Plan Template.” Template document. Harvard University. http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/alejandro_ganimian/files/pre-analysis_plan_template_0.pdf.Google Scholar

Gans, Herbert J. 1992. “Sociological Amnesia: The Noncumulation of Normal Social Science.” Sociological Forum 7: 701–710.Google Scholar

Gans, Joshua. 2017. Scholarly Publishing and its Discontents: An Economist’s Perspective on Dealing with Market Power and its Consequences. Toronto: Core Economic Research.Google Scholar

Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

García, Fernando Martel. 2016. “Replication and the Manufacture of Scientific Inferences: A Formal Approach.” International Studies Perspectives 17 (4): 408–425.Google Scholar

Garfield, E. 1955. “Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas.” Science 122 (3159): 108–111.Google Scholar

Gazni, Ali and Didegah, Fereshteh. 2011. “Investigating Different Types of Research Collaboration and Citation Impact: A Case Study of Harvard University’s Publications.” Scientometrics 87 (2): 251–265.Google Scholar

Gehlbach, Scott. 2015. “The Fallacy of Multiple Methods.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 25 (2): 11–12.Google Scholar

Geller, Daniel S. and John A., Vasquez (eds). 2005. The Construction and Cumulation of Knowledge in International Relations. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew and Gross, Neil. 2015. “Political Attitudes in Social Environments.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38: E114.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew and Loken, Eric. 2013. “The Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even When There is No ‘Fishing Expedition’ or ‘p-Hacking’ and the Research Hypothesis Was Posited ahead of Time.” November. www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/p_hacking.pdf.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew and Loken, Eric. 2014. “The Statistical Crisis in Science: Data-dependent Analysis – A “Garden of Forking Paths” – Explains Why Many Statistically Significant Comparisons Don’t Hold Up.” American Scientist 102 (6): 460.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew, Pasarica, Cristian and Dodhia, Rahul. 2002. “Let’s Practice What We Preach.” The American Statistician 56 (2): 121–130.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew and Stern, Hal. 2006. “The Difference between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is Not Itself Statistically Significant.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 60: 328–331.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan S. and Malhotra, Neil. 2008a. “Do Statistical Reporting Standards Affect What is Published? Publication Bias in Two Leading Political Science Journals.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3: 313–326.Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan S. and Malhotra, Neil. 2008b. “Publication Bias in Empirical Sociological Research: Do Arbitrary Significance Levels Distort Published Results?” Sociological Methods and Research 37 (1): 3–30.Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P. and Nickerson, David. 2001. “Testing for Publication Bias in Political Science.” Political Analysis 9 (4): 385–392.Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan S., Malhotra, Neil, Dowling, Conor and Doherty, David. 2010. “Publication Bias in Two Political Behavior Literatures.” American Politics Research 38 (4): 591–613.Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan, Arceneaux, Kevin, Boudreau, Cheryl, Dowling, Conor, Hillygus, Sunshine, Palfrey, Thomas, Biggers, Daniel R. and Hendry, David J. 2014. “Reporting Guidelines for Experimental Research: A Report from the Experimental Research Section Standards Committee.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1 (1): 81–98.Google Scholar

Gerking, Shelby and Morgan, William E. 2007. “Effects of Environmental and Land Use Regulation in the Oil and Gas Industry Using the Wyoming Checkerboard as a Natural Experiment: Retraction.” American Economic Review 97 (3): 1032.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2012a. “Mere Description.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (04): 721–746.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2012b. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2017. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John and Cojocaru, Lee. 2016. “Arbitrary Limits to Scholarly Speech: Why (Short) Word Limits Should be Abolished.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 14: 1/2 (Spring/Fall): 2–13.Google Scholar

Gertler, Aaron L. and Bullock, John G.. 2017. “Reference Rot: An Emerging Threat to Transparency in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (1): 166–171.Google Scholar

Gherghina, Sergiu and Katsanidou, Alexia. 2013. “Data Availability in Political Science Journals.” European Political Science 12 (3): 333–349.Google Scholar

Ghiasi, Gita, Larivière, Vincent and Sugimoto, Cassidy R.. 2016. “Gender Differences in Synchronous and Diachronous Self-Citations.” In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Valencia, Spain: Editorial Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.Google Scholar

Gibler, Douglas M., Miller, Steven M. and Little, Erin K.. 2016. Analysis of the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) Dataset, 1816–2001. International Studies Quarterly 60 (December): 719–730.Google Scholar

Gieryn, Thomas. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2015. “The Temporary Importance of Role Models for Women’s Political Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 957–970.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Christopher L. 1989. “LSE and the British Approach to Time Series Econometrics.” Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 41 (1): 108–128.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Daniel T., King, Gary, Pettigrew, Stephen and Wilson, Timothy D.. 2016. “Comment on ‘Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.’” Science 351 (6277): 1037.Google Scholar

Giner-Sorolla, Roger. 2012. “Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 562–571.Google Scholar

Gingras, Y. 2016. Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ginther, Donna K. and Kahn, Shulamit. 2004. “Women in Economics: Moving Up or Falling Off the Academic Career Ladder?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (3): 193–214.Google Scholar

Glandon, Philip. 2010. “Report on the American Economic Review Data Availability Compliance Project.” Vanderbilt University. https://aeaweb.org/aer/2011_Data_Compliance_Report.pdf.Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney and Strauss, Anselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Glass, Gene V., Smith, Mary Lee and McGaw, Barry. 1981. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Glennerster, Rachel and Takavarasha, Kudzai. 2013. Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gleser, Leon J. 1986. “Some Notes on Refereeing.” The American Statistician 40 (4): 310–312.Google Scholar

Go, Julian. 2016. Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary. 2017. “Descriptive-Causal Generalizations: ‘Empirical Laws’ in the Social Sciences?” Pp. 85–108 in Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Kincaid, Harold (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary and Mahoney, James. 2012. “Concepts and Measurement: Ontology and Epistemology.” Social Science Information 51 (2): 205–216.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou. 2016. “Report of the Editor: American Economic Review.” American Economic Review 106 (5): 700–712.Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia. 1992. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia. 2006. “The Quiet Revolution that Transformed Women’s Employment, Education, and Family.” American Economic Review 96 (2): 1–21.Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia and Katz., Larry F. 2016. “A Most Egalitarian Profession: Pharmacy and the Evolution of a Family Friendly Occupation.” Journal of Labor Economics 34 (3): 705–745.Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia and Katz., Larry F. 2011. “The Cost of Workplace Flexibility for High-Powered Professionals.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 638 (1): 45–67.Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia, Katz, Lawrence F. and Kuziemko, Ilyana. 2006. “The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the Gender Gap in College.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 133–156.Google Scholar

Goodman, Steven, Fanelli, Daniele and Ioannidis, John. 2016. “What Does Research Reproducibility Mean?” Science Translational Medicine 8 (341): 1–6.Google Scholar

Gorg, Holger and Strobl, Eric. 2001. “Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta-Analysis.” Economic Journal 111 (475): 723–739.Google Scholar

Gorski, Philip S. 2009. “Social ‘Mechanisms’ and Comparative-Historical Sociology: A Critical Realist Proposal.” Pp. 147–194 in Hedström, Peter and Wittrock, Björn (eds), Frontiers of Sociology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Gough, David and Elbourne, Diana. 2002. “Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice, and Democratic Debate.” Social Policy and Society 1: 225–236.Google Scholar

Gough, Ian. 2015. “The Political Economy of Prevention.” British Journal of Political Science 45 (02): 307–327.Google Scholar

Gouldner, Alvin. 1954. Patterns of Industrial Democracy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Gouldner, Alvin and Peterson, Richard. 1962. Notes on Technology and the Moral Order. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Grant, Sean, Mayo-Wilson, Evan, Hopewell, Sally, Macdonald, Geraldine, Moher, David and Montgomery, Paul. 2013. “Developing a Reporting Guideline for Social and Psychological Intervention Trials.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 9 (3): 355–367.Google Scholar

Gray, Paul et al. 2007. The Research Imagination: An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gray, Ronald H. et al. 2007. “Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Men in Rakai, Uganda: A Randomised Trial.” Lancet 369 (9562): 657–666.Google Scholar

Greenland, Sander. 2006. “Bayesian Perspectives for Epidemiological Research.” International Journal of Epidemiology (35): 765–775.Google Scholar

Greenwald, Anthony G. 1975. “Consequences of Prejudice against the Null Hypothesis.” Psychological Bulletin 82 (1): 1.Google Scholar

Greve, Werner, Bröder, Arndt and Erdfelder, Edgar. 2013. “Result-Blind Peer Reviews and Editorial Decisions.” European Psychologist 18 (4) 286–294.Google Scholar

Gross, Neil. 2009. “A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review 74: 358–379.Google Scholar

Gross, Neil. 2013. Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gross, Neil and Simmons, Solon (eds). 2014. Professors and Their Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Guarino, Cassandra M. and Borden, Victor M. H.. 2017. “Faculty Service Loads and Gender: Are Women Taking Care of the Academic Family?” Research in Higher Education 58 (6): 672–694.Google Scholar

Gunaratnam, Yasmin. 2003. Researching “Race” and Ethnicity: Methods, Knowledge and Power. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Gutzkow, Joshua, Lamont, Michèle and Mallard, Grégoire. 2004. “What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences?” American Sociological Review 69: 190–212.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob and Pierson, Paul. 2002. “Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State.” Politics and Society 30 (2): 277–325.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob and Pierson, Paul. 2010. “Winner-Take-All-Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States.” Politics and Society 38 (2): 152–204.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2012. “Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 495–516.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies XLIV: 936–957.Google Scholar

Hamermesh, Daniel S. 2007. “Viewpoint: Replication in economics.” Canadian Journal of Economics 40: 715–733.Google Scholar

Hamermesh, Daniel S. 2018. “Citations in Economics: Measurement, Uses and Impacts.” Journal of Economic Literature 56 (1): 115–156.Google Scholar

Hames, Irene. 2007. Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hammersley, Martyn. 2010. “Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues.” Sociological Research Online 15 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar

Hancock, Ange Marie. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 63–79.Google Scholar

Hancock, Ange Marie. 2015. “Intersectionality’s Will toward Social Transformation.” New Political Science 37 (4): 620–627.Google Scholar

Hancock, Ange Marie. 2016. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Handcock, Mark and Gile, Krista. 2011. “Comment: On the Concept of Snowball Sampling.” Sociological Methodology 41 (1): 367–371.Google Scholar

Hankins, Dorothy. 1929. “Current Research Projects.” American Journal of Sociology 35 (3): 445–468.Google Scholar

Hansen, Peter Reinhard. 2005. “A Test for Superior Predictive Ability.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 23 (4): 365–380.Google Scholar

Hanson, Jonathan K. 2015. “Democracy and State Capacity: Complements or Substitutes?” Studies in Comparative International Development 50 (3): 304–330.Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra. 2005. “Negotiating with the Positivist Legacy: New Social Justice Movements and a Standpoint Politics of Method.” Pp. 346–365 in George Steinmetz (ed.), The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Hardt, Heidi, Smith, Amy Erica, Kim, Hannah and Meister, Philippe. 2018. “The Gender Readings Gap in Political Science.” Presented at the Visions in Methodology Conference.Google Scholar

Hardt, Heidi, Smith, Amy Erica, Kim, Hannah and Meister, Philippe. 2019. “The Gender Readings Gap in Political Science Graduate Training.” Journal of Politics 81 (4): n. p.Google Scholar

Hart, Chris. 2018. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Hartman, Alexandra, Samii, Cyrus and Christensen, Darin. 2017. “A Qualitative Pre-Analysis Plan for Legible Institutions and Land Demand: The Effect of Property Rights Systems on Investment in Liberia.” October 20. osf.io/46r87.Google Scholar

Hartman, Alexandra, Kern, Florian and Mellor, David T.. 2018. “Preregistration for Qualitative Research Template.” OSF. osf.io/j7ghv. September 27.Google Scholar

Harvey, Campbell R., Liu, Yan and Zhu, Heqing. 2015. “And the Cross-Section of Expected Returns.” Review of Financial Studies (October): hhv059.Google Scholar

Harzing, A. W. 2007. Publish or Perish, available at www.harzing.com/pop.htm.Google Scholar

Hauser, Robert M. 1987. “Sharing Data – It’s Time for ASA Journals to Follow the Folkways of a Scientific Sociology.” American Sociological Review 52 (6): vi–viii.Google Scholar

Haustein, Stefanie, Peters, Isabella, Sugimoto, Cassidy R., Thelwall, Mike and Larivière, Vincent. 2014. “Tweeting Biomedicine: An Analysis of Tweets and Citations in the Biomedical Literature.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (4): 656–669.Google Scholar

Haustein, Stefanie, Costas, Rodrigo and Larivière, Vincent. 2015. “Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns.” PLoS ONE 10 (3): e0120495.Google Scholar

Havranek, Tomas andIrsova, Zuzana. 2012. “Survey Article: Publication Bias in the Literature on Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers.” Journal of Development Studies 48 (10): 1375–1396.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Carlee Beth, Fitzgerald, Cailey E. and Nosek, Brian A.. 2015. “In Search of an Association Between Conception Risk and Prejudice.” Psychological Science 26 (2): 249–252.Google Scholar

Hayes, Wayland. 1942. “An Exploratory Study of Objectives for Introductory Sociology.” Social Forces 21 (2): 165–172.Google Scholar

Headworth, Spencer and Freese, Jeremy. 2016. “Credential Privilege or Cumulative Advantage? Prestige, Productivity, and Placement in the Academic Sociology Job Market.” Social Forces 94: 1257–1282.Google Scholar

Health Research Council (HRC). 2016. Health Research Council of New Zealand. Downloaded on September 22, 2016 from www.hrc.govt.nz/funding-opportunities/researcher-initiated-proposals/explorer-grants.Google Scholar

Healy, Kieran and Moody, James. 2014. “Data Visualization in Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 40: 105–128.Google Scholar

Heaton, Janet. 2008. “Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data: An Overview.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 33 (3 (125)): 33–45.Google Scholar

Hedges, Larry V. 1992. “Modeling Publication Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis.” Statistical Science 7 (2): 246–255.Google Scholar

Hedges, Larry V. and Vevea, Jack L. 1996. “Estimating Effect Size Under Publication Bias: Small Sample Properties and Robustness of a Random Effects Selection Model.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 21 (4): 299–332.Google Scholar

Hedström, Peter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heffetz, Ori and Ligett, Katrina. 2014. “Privacy and Data-Based Research.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (2): 75–98.Google Scholar

Hendrix, Cullen. 2015. “Google Scholar Metrics and Scholarly Productivity in International Relations.” Guest post on Duck of Minerva. http://duckofminerva.com/2015/08/google-scholar-metrics-and-scholarly-productivity-in-international-relations.html.Google Scholar

Hendry, David F. 1987. “Econometric Methodology: A Personal Perspective.” Pp. 29–48 in Truman Bewley (ed.), Advances in Econometrics: Volume 2: Fifth World Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hendry, David F. 1995. Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heneberg, Petr. 2016. “From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators.” PloS ONE 11 (4): e0153730.Google Scholar

Hengel, Erin. 2017. “Publishing while Female. Are Women Held to Higher Standards? Evidence from Peer Review.” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1753, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven J. and Norensayan, Ara. 2010. “The Weirdest People in the World?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33: 61–135.Google Scholar

Henry, Emeric. 2009. “Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty.” Economic Journal 119 (539): 1036–1064.Google Scholar

Henry, Emeric and Ottaviani, Marco. 2014. “Research and the Approval Process: The Organization of Persuasion.” American Economic Review 109 (3): 911–955.Google Scholar

Herbst, Jeffrey. 2000. States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Herndon, Thomas, Ash, Michae and Pollin, Robert. 2014. “Does High Public Debt Consistently Stifle Economic Growth? A Critique of Reinhart and Rogoff.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (2): 257–279.Google Scholar

Hewitt, John K. 2012. “Editorial Policy on Candidate Gene Association and Candidate Gene-by-Environment Interaction Studies of Complex Traits.” Behavior Genetics 42: 1–2.Google Scholar

Hicks, Diana. 1999. “The Difficulty of Achieving Full Coverage of International Social Science Literature and the Bibliometric Consequences.” Scientometrics 44 (2): 193–215.Google Scholar

Hicks, Joan Hamory, Kremer, Michael and Miguel, Edward. 2015. “Commentary: Deworming Externalities and Schooling Impacts in Kenya: A Comment on Aiken Et al. (2015) and Davey Et al. (2015).” International Journal of Epidemiology 44 (5): 1593–1596.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Barry T. 2004. “Reconsidering Union Wage Effects: Surveying New Evidence on an Old Topic.” Journal of Labor Research 25 (2): 233–266.Google Scholar

Hirshleifer, Sarojini, McKenzie, David, Almeida, Rita and Ridao-Cano, Cristobal. 2015. “The Impact of Vocational Training for the Unemployed: Experimental Evidence from Turkey.” Economic Journal, June, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12211.Google Scholar

Hix, Simon. 2004. “A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments.” Political Studies Review 2 (3): 293–313.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie. 1969. “The Ambassador’s Wife: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 31: 73–87.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie. 2017. Email on exploratory studies. February 17.Google Scholar

Hodson, Simon. 2016. “Sustainable Business Models for Data Repositories.” RDA Plenary, Tokyo, March 3. https://rd-alliance.org/sites/default/files/attachment/S.%20Hodson%20Business%20Models%20Presentation.pdf.Google Scholar

Hoeffler, Jan H. 2013. “Teaching Replication in Quantitative Empirical Economics.” World Economics Association (WEA), Conference on the Economics Curriculum: Towards a Radical Reformation: May 3–31.Google Scholar

Hofstadter, Richard and Metzger, Walter. 1955. The Development of Academic Freedom in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Holm, Sture. 1979. “A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (2): 65–70.Google Scholar

Hook, Jennifer. 2017. “Women’s Housework: New Tests of Time and Money.” Journal of Marriage and Family 79 (1): 179–198.Google Scholar

Hopf, Ted and Allan, Bentley B (eds). 2016. Making Identity Count: Building a National Identity Database. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Michael C., Stam, Allan C. and Ellis, Cali M.. 2015. Why Leaders Fight. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie Russell and Machung, Anne. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Hoxby, Caroline M. 2000. “Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?” American Economic Review 90 (5): 1209–1238.Google Scholar

Hoxby, Caroline M. 2007. “Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers? A Reply.” American Economic Review 97 (5): 2038–2055.Google Scholar

Hudson, John. 2007. “Be Known by the Company You Keep: Citations – Quality or Chance?” Scientometrics 71 (2): 231–238.Google Scholar

Hug, Sven E. and Brändle, Martin P.. 2017. “The Coverage of Microsoft Academic: Analyzing the Publication Output of a University.” Scientometrics 113: 1551.Google Scholar

Hug, Sven E., Ochsner, Michael and Brändle, Martin P.. 2017. “Citation Analysis with Microsoft Academic.” Scientometrics 111: 371–378.Google Scholar

Hughes, Everett C. 1949. “Review of John Dollard, Caste and Class in a Southern Town.” American Journal of Sociology 55 (2): 20709.Google Scholar

Hughes, Everett C. 1960. “Introduction: The Place of Field Work in Social Science”. Pp. iii–xiii in Buford Junker (ed.), Field Work: An Introduction to the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hui, Victoria. 2005. War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Humphreys, Macartan and Jacobs, Alan M.. 2015. “Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Approach.” American Political Science Review 109 (4): 653–673.Google Scholar

Humphreys, Macartan and Jacobs, Alan M.. 2021. Integrated Inferences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Humphreys, Macartan, de la Sierra, Raul Sanchez and van der Windt, Peter. 2013. “Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research Registration.” Political Analysis 21 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar

Hung, H. M. James, O’Neill, Robert T., Bauer, Peter and Kohne, Karl. 1997. “The Behavior of the P-Value When the Alternative Hypothesis Is True.” Biometrics 53 (1): 11–22.Google Scholar

Hunt, Morton. 1997. How Science Takes Stock: The Story of Meta-Analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Hunter, Douglas. 1984. Political/Military Applications of Bayesian Analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Hunter, John E. 2001. “The Desperate Need for Replications.” Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 149–158.Google Scholar

Husereau, Don, Drummond, Michael, Petrou, Stavros, Carswell, Chris, Moher, David, Greenberg, Dan, Augustovski, Federico et al. 2013. “Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement.” Value in Health: Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 16 (2): e1–5.Google Scholar

Huth, Paul and Russett, Bruce. 1984. “What Makes Deterrence Work? Cases from 1900 to 1980.” World Politics 36 (July): 496–526.Google Scholar

Huth, Paul and Russett, Bruce. 1990. “Testing Deterrence Theory: Rigor Makes a Difference.” World Politics 42 (July): 466–501.Google Scholar

Hyman, Herbert. 1991. Taking Society’s Measure: A Personal History of Survey Research. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Hymes, Kenneth B. et al. 1981. “Kaposi’s Sarcoma in Homosexual Men – a Report of Eight Cases.” The Lancet 318 (8247): 598–600.Google Scholar

Ifcher, John and Zarghamee, Homa. 2011. “Happiness and Time Preference: The Effect of Positive Affect in a Random-Assignment Experiment.” American Economic Review 101 (7): 3109–3129.Google Scholar

Igo, Sarah. 2011. “Subjects of Persuasion: Survey Research as a Solicitous Science, or, The Public Relations of the Polls.” Pp. 285–306 in Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil and Lamont, Michèle (eds), Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). 2017. “Data Citations.” www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/curation/citations.jsp.Google Scholar

International Consortium of Investigators for Fairness in Trial Data Sharing. 2016. “Toward Fairness in Data Sharing.” New England Journal of Medicine 375 (5): 405–407.Google Scholar

Ioannidis, John P. A. 2005. “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” PLoS Medicine 2 (8): e124.Google Scholar

Ioannidis, John P. A. 2008. “Effectiveness of Antidepressants: An Evidence Myth Constructed from a Thousand Randomized Trials?” Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3 (1): 14.Google Scholar

Ioannidis, John P., Greenland, Sander, Hlatky, Mark A., Khoury, Muin J., Macleod, Malcolm R., Moher, David, Schulz, Kenneth F. and Tibshirani, Robert. 2014. “Increasing Value and Reducing Waste in Research Design, Conduct, and Analysis.” The Lancet 383 (9912): 166–175.Google Scholar

Irwin, Sarah and Winterton, Mandy. 2012. “Qualitative Secondary Analysis and Social Explanation.” Sociological Research Online 17 (2): 1–12.Google Scholar

Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015. “For a More Public Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (2): 269–283.Google Scholar

ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. 1988. “Randomised Trial of Intravenous Streptokinase, Oral Aspirin, Both, Or Neither Among 17 187 Cases Of Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction: ISIS-2.” The Lancet, originally published as 2 (8607): 349–360.Google Scholar

Iversen, Torben and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2006. “The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar

Jackman, Simon and Western, Bruce. 1994. “Bayesian Inference for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 88 (2) :412–423.Google Scholar

Jackson, Michelle and Cox, D. R. 2013. “The Principles of Experimental Design and their Application in Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 39: 27–49.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Jerry A. 2004. “Presidential Address: The Faculty Time Divide.” Sociological Forum 19 (1): 3–27.Google Scholar

Jahoda, Marie and Cook, Stuart. 1952. “Security Measures and Freedom of Thought: An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Loyalty and Security Programs.” The Yale Law Journal 61 (3): 295–333.Google Scholar

Jahoda, Marie, Morton Deutsch and Stuart Cook. 1951. Research Methods in Social Relations with Especial Reference to Prejudice. 2 vols. New York: the Dryden Press.Google Scholar

Janis, Irving. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Jann, Ben. 2005. “Comment: Earnings Returns to Education in Urban China: A Note on Testing Differences among Groups.” American Sociological Review 70 (5): 860–864.Google Scholar

Janz, Nicole. 2016. “Bringing the Gold Standard into the Classroom: Replication in University Teaching.” International Studies Perspectives 17 (4): 392–407.Google Scholar

Jaschik, Scott. 2012. “Moving Further to the Left.” Insidehighered.com, October 24. www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/10/24/survey-finds-professors-already-liberal-have-moved-further-left.Google Scholar

Jaynes, Edwin T. 2003. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jensenius, Francesca R., Htun, Mala, Samuels, David J., Singer, David A., Lawrence, Adria and Chwe, Michael. 2018. “The Benefits and Pitfalls of Google Scholar.” PS: Political Science and Politics 51 (4): 820–824.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Jewett, Andrew. 2012. Science, Democracy, and the American University: From the Civil War to the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Joas, Hans. 1993. Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

John, Leslie K., Loewenstein, George and Prelec, Drazen. 2012. “Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling.” Psychological Science 23 (5): 524–532.Google Scholar

Johnson, James. 2003. “Conceptual Problems as Obstacles to Progress in Political Science: Four Decades of Political Culture Research.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (1): 87–115.Google Scholar

Johnston, Lisa R., Carlson, Jake, Hudson-Vitale, Cynthia, Imker, Heidi, Kozlowski, Wendy A., Olendorf, Robert and Stewart, Claire. 2017. “Data Curation Network: A Cross-Institutional Staffing Model for Curating Research Data.” http://hdl.handle.net/11299/188654.Google Scholar

Johnston, Lisa (ed.). 2016. Curating Research Data. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.Google Scholar

Jung, Courtney. 2015. Lactivism: How Feminists and Fundamentalists, Hippies and Yuppies, and Physicians and Politicians made Breastfeeding Big Business and Bad Policy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Jung, Kiju, Shavitt, Sharon, Viswanathan, Madhu and Hilbe, Joseph M.. 2014. “Female Hurricanes Are Deadlier than Male Hurricanes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (24): 8782–8787.Google Scholar

Jussim, Lee. 2016. “Are Most Published Social Psychology Findings False?” Heterodox Academy. http://heterodoxacademy.org/2016/02/23/are-most-published-social-psychology-findings-false/.Google Scholar

Kagel, John H. and Alvin E., Roth (eds). 2016. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Volume 2: The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, S. 1993. “Gender Differences in Academic Career Paths of Economists.” American Economic Review 83 (2): 52–56.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel. 2012. “A Proposal to Deal with Questions about Priming Effects.” Nature. www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/7.6716.1349271308!/suppinfoFile/Kahneman%20Letter.pdf.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel. 2014. “A New Etiquette for Replication.” Social Psychology 45 (4): 310.Google Scholar

Kanazawa, Satoshi. 2001. “Comment: Why We Love Our Children.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (6): 1761–1776.Google Scholar

Kane, Edward J. 1984. “Why Journal Editors Should Encourage the Replication of Applied Econometric Research.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 23 (1): 3–8.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, Diana. 2012. High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, Diana, Maclean, Lauren M. and Read, Benjamin L.. 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karabag, Solmaz Filiz and Berggren, Christian. 2012. “Retraction, Dishonesty and Plagiarism: Analysis of a Crucial Issue for Academic Publishing, and the Inadequate Responses from Leading Journals in Economics and Management Disciplines.” Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research 2 (4): 172–183.Google Scholar

Karcher, Sebastian and Pagé, Christiane. 2017. “Workshop Report: CAQDAS Projects and Digital Repositories’ Best Practices.” D-Lib Magazine 23 (3/4). doi:10.1045/march2017-karcher.Google Scholar

Karcher, Sebastian and Steinberg, David A.. 2013. “Assessing the Causes of Capital Account Liberalization: How Measurement Matters.” International Studies Quarterly 57 (1): 128–137.Google Scholar

Karcher, Sebastian, Kirilova, Dessislava and Weber, Nicholas. 2016. “Beyond the Matrix: Repository Services for Qualitative Data.” IFLA Journal 42 (4): 292–302.Google Scholar

Karl, Terry. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Katz, Daniel. 1955. “Review of Berelson, Lazarsfeld and McPhee, Voting.” Public Opinion Quarterly 19: 326–328.Google Scholar

Katz, Larry, Duflo, Esther, Goldberg, Pinelopi and Thomas, Duncan. 2013. “AEA E-Mail Announcement.” American Economic Association. www.aeaweb.org/announcements/20131118_rct_email.php.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Robert. 2009. “The Political Effects of Inequality in Latin America: Some Inconvenient Facts.” Comparative Politics 41 (3): 359–379.Google Scholar

Kendall, Patricia. 1957. “Appendix C: Note on Significance Tests”. Pp. 301–305 in Merton, Robert K., Reader, George and Kendall, Patricia (eds), The Student-Physician. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kern, Florian G. and Gleditsch, Kristian. 2017. “Exploring Pre-registration and Pre-analysis Plans for Qualitative Inference.” Unpublished working paper. Available online at https://bit.ly/2NBXNrk.Google Scholar

Khanna, Kabir and Imai, Kosuke. 2017. “Wru: Who are you? Bayesian Prediction of Racial Category using Surname and Geolocation.” https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/wru/index.html.Google Scholar

Kidwell, Mallory C., Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Baranski, Erica, Hardwicke, Tom E., Piechowski, Sarah, Falkenberg, Lina-Sophia, Kennett, Curtis et al. 2016. “Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency.” PLoS Biology 14 (5): e1002456.Google Scholar

Kier, Elizabeth. 1997. Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine Between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kincaid, Harold. 1990. “Defending Laws in the Social Sciences.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1): 56–83.Google Scholar

King, Gary. 1995. “Replication, Replication.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (03): 444–452.Google Scholar

King, Gary. 2006. “Publication, Publication.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (1): 119–125.Google Scholar

King, Gary. 2014. “Restructuring the Social Sciences: Reflections from Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (1): 165–172.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

King, Molly M., Bergstrom, Carl T, Correll, Shelley J, Jacquet, Jennifer and West, Jevin D.. 2017. “Men Set their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-Citation across Fields and over Time.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 3 (December): 237802311773890.Google Scholar

Kirsch, Irving, Deacon, Brett J., Huedo-Medina, Tania B., Scoboria, Alan, Moore, Thomas J. and Johnson, Blair T.. 2008. “Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.” PLoS Medicine 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045.Google Scholar

Klein, Daniel and Western, Andrew. 2004–2005. “Voter Registration of Berkeley and Stanford Faculty.” Academic Questions 18: 53–65.Google Scholar

Klein, Joshua R. and Roodman, Aaron. 2005. “Blind Analysis in Nuclear and Particle Physics.” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 55 (1): 141–163.Google Scholar

Klein, Richard A., Ratliff, Kate A., Vianello, Michelangelo, Adams, Reginald B., Bahník, Štěpán, Bernstein, Michael J., Bocian, Konrad et al. 2014. “Investigating Variation in Replicability.” Social Psychology 45 (3): 142–152.Google Scholar

Kleinberg, Jon, Lakkaraju, Himabindu, Leskovec, Jure, Ludwig, Jens and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2015. “Human Decisions and Machine Problems.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Kleinberg, Jon, Ludwig, Jens, Mullainathan, Sendhil and Obermeyer, Ziad. 2015. “Prediction Policy Problems.” American Economic Review 105 (5): 491–495.Google Scholar

Kling, Jeffrey R., Liebman, Jeffrey B. and Katz, Lawrence F.. 2007. “Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects.” Econometrica 75 (1): 83–119.Google Scholar

Knell, Markus and Stix, Helmut. 2005. “The Income Elasticity of Money Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Results.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 513–533.Google Scholar

Knittel, Christopher R. and Metaxoglou, Konstantinos. 2011. “Challenges in Merger Simulation Analysis.” American Economic Review 101 (3): 56–59.Google Scholar

Knittel, Christopher R. and Metaxoglou, Konstantinos. 2013. “Estimation of Random-Coefficient Demand Models: Two Empiricists’ Perspective.” Review of Economics and Statistics 96 (1): 34–59.Google Scholar

Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia and Glynn, Carroll J. 2013. “The Matilda Effect – Role Congruity Effects on Scholarly Communication: A Citation Analysis of Communication Research and Journal of Communication Articles.” Communication Research 40 (1): 3–26.Google Scholar

Knowles, J. Gary and Cole, Ardra (eds). 2008. Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Knuth, Donald Ervin. 1992. Literate Programming. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Koenker, Roger and Zeileis, Achim. 2009. “On Reproducible Econometric Research.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 24 (5): 833–847.Google Scholar

Koole, Sander L. and Lakens, Daniel. 2012. “Rewarding Replications: A Sure and Simple Way to Improve Psychological Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 608–614.Google Scholar

Kovesdy, Csaba P. and Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar. 2012. “Observational Studies versus Randomized Controlled Trials: Avenues to Causal Inference in Nephrology.” Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease 19 (1): 11–18.Google Scholar

Kratz, John and Strasser, Carly. 2014. “Data Publication Consensus and Controversies.” F1000Research, October. doi:10.12688/f1000research.3979.3.Google Scholar

Ku, G., Wang, C. S. and Galinsky, A. D.. 2010. “Perception through a Perspective-Taking Lens: Differential Effects on Judgments and Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 792–798.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kunce, Mitch, Gerking, Shelby and Morgan, William. 2002. “Effects of Environmental and Land Use Regulation in the Oil and Gas Industry Using the Wyoming Checkerboard as an Experimental Design.” American Economic Review 92 (5): 1588–1593.Google Scholar

Kurtz, Marcus. 2009. “The Social Foundations of Institutional Order: Reconsidering War and the ‘Resource Curse’ in Third World State Building.” Politics and Society 37 (4): 479–520.Google Scholar

Kurtz, Marcus. 2013. Latin American State Building in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kurtz, Marcus and Schrank, Andrew. 2007. “Growth and Governance: Models, Measures, and Mechanisms.” Journal of Politics 69 (2): 538–554.Google Scholar

Laan, van der, Mark, J, Polley, Eric C and Hubbard, Alan E.. 2007. “Super Learner.” Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 (1). www.degruyter.com/view/j/sagmb.2007.6.1/sagmb.2007.6.1.1309/sagmb.2007.6.1.1309.xml.Google Scholar

LaCour, Michael J. and Green, Donald P.. 2014. “When Contact Changes Minds: An Experiment on Transmission of Support for Gay Equality.” Science 346 (6215): 1366.Google Scholar

Ladd, Everett Carll, Jr. and Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1976. The Divided Academy: Professors and Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Lai, Brian and Reiter, Dan. 2000. “Democracy, Political Similarity, and International Alliances, 1816–1992.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (2): 203–227.Google Scholar

Laine, Christine, Horton, Richard, DeAngelis, Catherine D., Drazen, Jeffrey M., Frizelle, Frank A., Godlee, Fiona, Haug, Charlotte et al. 2007. “Clinical Trial Registration – Looking Back and Moving Ahead.” New England Journal of Medicine 356 (26): 2734–2736.Google Scholar

Laitin, David D. 2013. “Fisheries Management.” Political Analysis 21 (1): 42–47.Google Scholar

Laitin, David D. and Reich, Rob. 2017. “Trust, Transparency, and Replication in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (1): 172–175. =Google Scholar

LaLonde, Robert J. 1986. “Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data.” American Economic Review 76 (4): 604–620.Google Scholar

Lamont, Michèle. 2009. How Professors Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Langan, Andrew. 2018. “Female Managers and Gender Disparities: The Case of Academic Department Chairs." November.Google Scholar

Langan, Andrew. “Female Managers and Gender Disparities: The Case of Academic Department Chairs.” (Working Paper).Google Scholar

Larivière, Vincent, Gingras, Yves, Sugimoto, Cassidy R. and Tsou, Andrew. 2014. “Team Size Matters: Collaboration and Scientific Impact since 1900.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66: 1323–1332.Google Scholar

Larivière, Vincent, Ni, Chaoqun, Gingras, Yves, Cronin, Blaise and Sugimoto, Cassidy R. 2013. “Bibliometrics: Global Gender Disparities in Science.” Nature News 504 (7479): 211.Google Scholar

Larivière, Vincent, Kiermer, Veronique, MacCallum, Catriona J., McNutt, Marcia, Patterson, Mark, Pulverer, Bernd, Swaminathan, Sowmya, Taylor, Stuart and Curry, Stephen. 2016. “A Simple Proposal for the Publication of Journal Citation Distributions.” BioRxiv, July, 062109. https://doi.org/10.1101/062109.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry. 1977. Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lave, Charles A. and March, James G.. 1993. An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences. New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Peter A. 2007. “The Mismeasurement of Science.” Current Biology 17 (15): R583–R585.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, Paul and Rosenberg, Morris (eds). 1955. The Language of Social Research: A Reader in the Methodology of Social Research. 2nd ed. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, Paul and Thielens, Wagner. 1958. The Academic Mind: Social Scientists in a Time of Crisis. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lazear, Edward P. 2006. “Speeding, Terrorism, and Teaching to the Test.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (3): 1029–1061.Google Scholar

Leamer, Edward E. 1978. Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Leamer, Edward E. 1983. “Let’s Take the Con Out of Econometrics.” American Economic Review 73 (1): 31–43.Google Scholar

Leamer, Edward E. 2010. “Tantalus on the Road to Asymptopia.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 31–46.Google Scholar

Leamer, Edward E. 2016. “S-Values: Conventional Context-Minimal Measures of the Sturdiness of Regression Coefficients.” Journal of Econometrics 193 (1): 147–161.Google Scholar

Leamer, Edward E. and Leonard, Herman. 1983. “Reporting the Fragility of Regression Estimates.” Review of Economics and Statistics 65 (2): 306–317.Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned and Stein, Janice Gross. 1987. “Beyond Deterrence.” Journal of Social Issues 43(Winter): 5–71.Google Scholar

Lee, Soohyung and Shaikh, Azeem M. 2014. “Multiple Testing and Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: Re-Evaluating the Effect of Progresa on School Enrollment.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 29 (4): 612–626.Google Scholar

Leeds, Brett Ashley, Ritter, Jeffrey M., Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin and Long, Andrew G.. 2002. “Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815–1944.” International Interactions 28: 237–260.Google Scholar

Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2017. “Validity is Not Conformity: Measuring Accuracy in Coup Datasets.” APSA-CD Newsletter 15(June): 5, 13–16.Google Scholar

Leimer, Dean R. and Lesnoy, Selig D.. 1982. “Social Security and Private Saving: New Time-Series Evidence.” Journal of Political Economy 90 (3): 606–629.Google Scholar

Leimu, Roosa and Koricheva, Julia. 2005a. “Does Scientific Collaboration Increase the Impact of Ecological Articles?” BioScience 55 (5): 438–443.Google Scholar

Leimu, Roosa and Koricheva, Julia. 2005b. “What Determines the Citation Frequency of Ecological Papers?” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20 (1): 28–32.Google Scholar

Leplin, Jarrett (ed.). 1984. Scientific Realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lepore, Jill. 2015. “The Cobweb.” The New Yorker, January 26, 33–41.Google Scholar

Leslie, Sarah-Jane, Cimpian, Andrei, Meyer, Meredith and Freeland, Edward. 2015. “Expectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender Distributions across Academic Disciplines.” Science 347 (6219): 262–265.Google Scholar

Levine, David I. 2001. “Editor’s Introduction to ‘The Unemployment Effects of Minimum Wages: Evidence from a Prespecified Research Design.’” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 40 (2): 161–162.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael, Bryman, Alan and Liao, Tim F. (eds). 2004. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Lewis, Janet. 2000. “Funding Social Science Research in Academia.” Social Policy and Administration 34 (4): 365–376.Google Scholar

Lewis, Jenny. 2013. Academic Governance: Disciplines and Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lewis, Nathan S., Barnes, Charles A, Heben, Michael J., Kumar, Anil, Lunt, Sharon R., McManis, George E., Miskelly, Gordon M., et al. 1989. “Searches for Low-Temperature Nuclear Fusion of Deuterium in Palladium.” Nature 340 (6234). https://sofi-northwestern.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/searches-for-low-temperature-nuclear-fusion-of-deuterium-in-palla.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Bryman, Alan and Liao, Tim F.. 2003. The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA; London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Liao, Tim F. 1990. “A Unified Three-Dimensional Framework of Theory Development and Development in Sociology.” Sociological Theory 8: 85–98.Google Scholar

Libgober, Jonathan. 2015. “False Positives in Scientific Research.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2617130. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2617130.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Evan S. 2016. “Can the Biomedical Research Cycle be a Model for Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (4) (December): 1054–1066.Google Scholar

Lieshout, Robert S., Segers, Mathieu L. L. and Vleuten, Johanna Maria van der. 2004. “De Gaulle, Moravscik, and the Choice for Europe: Soft Sources, Weak Evidence.” Journal of Cold War History 6(Fall): 89–139.Google Scholar

Light, Richard J. and Pillemer, David B.. 1984. Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lindsay, D. Stephen. 2015. “Replication in Psychological Science.” Psychological Science, November, 0956797615616374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53 (March): 69–105.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1967. “The Biography of a Research Project: Union Democracy.” Pp. 111–39 in Phillip Hammond (ed.), Sociologists at Work. New York: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin and Bendix, Reinhard. 1952. “Social Mobility and Occupational Career Patterns II. Social Mobility.” American Journal of Sociology 57 (5): 494–504.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin, Trow, Martin and Coleman, James. 1956. Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Lipsey, Mark W. and Wilson, David B. 2001. Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

List, John, Bailey, Charles, Euzent, Patricia and Martin, Thomas. 2001. “Academic Economists Behaving Badly? A Survey on Three Areas of Unethical Behavior.” Economic Inquiry 39 (1): 162–170.Google Scholar

List, John A., Shaikh, Azeem M. and Xu, Yang. 2016. “Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Experimental Economics.” Working Paper 21875. National Bureau of Economic Research. www.nber.org/papers/w21875.Google Scholar

Lo, Nigel, Hashimoto, Barry and Reiter, Dan. 2008. “Ensuring Peace: Foreign-Imposed Regime Change and Postwar Peace Duration, 1914–2001.” International Organization 62(October): 717–736.Google Scholar

Loder, Elizabeth, Groves, Trish and MacAuley, Domhnall. 2010. “Registration of Observational Studies: The Next Step towards Research Transparency.” British Medical Journal 340 (February 18 2): c950.Google Scholar

Longhi, Simonetta, Nijkamp, Peter and Poot, Jacques. 2005. “A Meta-Analytic Assessment of the Effect of Immigration on Wages.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 451–477.Google Scholar

Longino, Helen. 2013. Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression and Sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Longo, Dan L. and Drazen, Jeffrey M.. 2016. “Data Sharing.” New England Journal of Medicine 374 (3): 276–277.Google Scholar

Lovell, Michael C. 1983. “Data Mining.” Review of Economics and Statistics 65 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar

Lozano, George A., Larivière, Vincent and Gingras, Yves. 2012. “The Weakening Relationship between the Impact Factor and Papers’ Citations in the Digital Age.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (11): 2140–2145.Google Scholar

Lucas, Jeffrey W., Morrell, Kevin and Posard, Marek. (2013) “Considerations on the ‘Replication Problem’ in Sociology.” The American Sociologist 44: 217–232.Google Scholar

Lundberg, Shelly and Pollak, Robert. 1993. “Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market.” Journal of Political Economy 101 (6): 988–1010.Google Scholar

Lundqvist, Heléne, Dahlberg, Matz and Mörk, Eva. 2014. “Stimulating Local Public Employment: Do General Grants Work?” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6 (1): 167–192.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and Alter, George. 2014. “Data Access and Research Transparency in the Quantitative Tradition.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (01): 54–59.Google Scholar

Lyall, Jason and Wilson III, Isaiah. 2009. “Rage Against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars.” International Organization 63(Winter): 67–106.Google Scholar

Lynd, Robert. 1939. Knowledge for What? The Place of Social Science in American Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lyons, Paul. 2009. American Conservatism: Thinking It, Teaching It. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar

MacCoun, Robert and Perlmutter, Saul. 2015. “Blind Analysis: Hide Results to Seek the Truth.” Nature 526 (7572): 187–189.Google Scholar

Mack, Raymond W. 1951. “The Need for Replication Research in Sociology.” American Sociological Review 16 (1):93–94.Google Scholar

Maggioni, Aldo P., Darne, Bernadette, Atar, Dan, Abadie, Eric, Pitt, Bertram and Zannad, Faiez. 2007. “FDA and CPMP Rulings on Subgroup Analyses.” Cardiology 107 (2): 97–102.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. 2012. “The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences.” Sociological Methods and Research 41(4): 570–597.Google Scholar

Maley, Steve. 2014. “Statistics Show No Evidence of Gender Bias in the Public’s Hurricane Preparedness.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (37): E3834–E3834.Google Scholar

Malin, Bradley, Benitez, Kathleen and Masys, Daniel. 2011. “Never Too Old for Anonymity: A Statistical Standard for Demographic Data Sharing via the HIPAA Privacy Rule.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18 (1): 3–10.Google Scholar

Maliniak, Daniel, Powers, Ryan and Walter, Barbara. 2013. “The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations.” International Organization 67 (4): 889–922.Google Scholar

Malkiel, Nancy Weiss. 2016. “Keep the Damned Women Out”: The Struggle for Coeducation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Malter, Daniel. 2014. “Female Hurricanes Are Not Deadlier than Male Hurricanes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (34): E3496–E3496.Google Scholar

Mannheim, Karl. 1927/1952. “The Problem of Generations.” Pp. 276–322 in Paul Kecskemeti (ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge: Collected Works. Volume 5. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Edwin, Schwartz, Mark and Wagner, Samuel. 1981. “Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study.” Economic Journal 91 (364): 907–918.Google Scholar

March, James G. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization and Science 2 (1):71–87.Google Scholar

Maringer, Marcus and Stapel, Diederik A. 2009. “Retracted: Correction or Comparison? The Effects of Prime Awareness on Social Judgments.” European Journal of Social Psychology 39 (5): 719–733.Google Scholar

Marx, Jean L. 1984. “Strong New Candidate for AIDS Agent; A Newly Discovered Member of the Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Family is Very Closely Linked to the Immunodeficiency Disease.” Science 224: 475.Google Scholar

Mason, Mary Ann, Goulden, Marc and Wolfinger, Nicholas H.. 2006. “Babies Matter.” In The Balancing Act: Gendered Perspectives in Faculty Roles and Work Lives. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar

Mason, Mary Ann, Wolfinger, Nicholas H. and Goulden, Marc. 2013. Do Babies Matter? Gender and Family in the Ivory Tower. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Mathieu, Sylvain, Boutron, Isabelle, Moher, David, Altman, Douglas G. and Ravaud, Philippe. 2009. “Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials.” Journal of the American Medical Association 302 (9): 977–984.Google Scholar

Maunsell, John. 2010. “Announcement Regarding Supplemental Material.” Journal of Neuroscience 30 (32): 10599–10600.Google Scholar

Mauthner, Natasha S. and Doucet, Andrea. 2003. “Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis.” Sociology 37 (3): 413–431.Google Scholar

Mauthner, Natasha S. and Doucet, Andrea. 2009. “Qualitative Data Preservation and Sharing in the Social Sciences: On Whose Philosophical Terms?” Australian Journal of Social Issues 44 (3): 291–307.Google Scholar

Mauthner, Natasha S, Parry, Odette and Backett-Milburn, Kathryn. 1998. “The Data Are out There, or Are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data.” Sociology 32 (04): 733–745.Google Scholar

Maxwell, Scott E., Lau, Michael Y. and Howard, George S.. 2015. “Is Psychology Suffering from a Replication Crisis? What Does “Failure to Replicate” Really Mean?” American Psychologist 70: 487–498.Google Scholar

McAleer, Michael, Pagan, Adrian R. and Volker, Paul A. 1985. “What Will Take the Con Out of Econometrics?” American Economic Review 75 (3): 293–307.Google Scholar

McAllister, James. 2010/11. “Who Lost Vietnam? Soldiers, Civilians, and U.S. Military Strategy.” International Security 35 (3): 95–123.Google Scholar

McChesney, Jasper. 2017. “The Representation and Pay of Women and Minorities in Higher Education Administration: Institutions That Are Getting It Right.” Research report. CUPA-HR. Available from: http://cupahr.org/surveys/publications/research-briefs/.Google Scholar

McCleary, Rachel and Barro, Robert. 2003. “Religion and Economic Growth across Countries.” American Sociological Review 68 (5): 760–781.Google Scholar

McCleary, Rachel and Barro, Robert. 2006. “Religion and Economy.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2): 49–72.Google Scholar

McCloskey, Deirdre N. and Ziliak, Stephen T.. 1996. “The Standard Error of Regressions.” Journal of Economic Literature 34 (1): 97–114.Google Scholar

McCrary, Justin, Christensen, Garret and Fanelli, Daniele. 2016. “Conservative Tests under Satisficing Models of Publication Bias.” PLoS ONE. February 22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149590.Google Scholar

McCullough, Bruce D. 2007. “Got Replicability? The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Archive.” Economic Journal Watch 4 (3): 326–337.Google Scholar

McCullough, Bruce D. 2009. “Open Access Economics Journals and the Market for Reproducible Economic Research.” March. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=775889276720076;res=IELBUS.Google Scholar

McCullough, Bruce D. and Vinod, Hrishikesh D.. 2003. “Verifying the Solution from a Nonlinear Solver: A Case Study.” American Economic Review 93 (3): 873–892.Google Scholar

McCullough, Bruce D. and Vinod, Hrishikesh D.. 2004. “Verifying the Solution from a Nonlinear Solver: A Case Study: Reply.” American Economic Review 94 (1): 400–403.Google Scholar

McCullough, Bruce D., McGeary, Kerry Anne and Harrison, Teresa D. 2006. “Lessons from the JMCB Archive.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 38 (4): 1093–1107.Google Scholar

McCullough, Bruce D., McGeary, Kerry Anne and Harrison, Teresa D. 2008. “Do Economics Journal Archives Promote Replicable Research?” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D’économique 41 (4): 1406–1420.Google Scholar

McIntyre, Lee C. 1996. Laws and Explanation in the Social Sciences: Defending a Science of Human Behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

McKeown, Timothy J. 1983. “Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe.” International Organization 37 (1): 73–91.Google Scholar

McManus, Walter S. 1985. “Estimates of the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: The Importance of the Researcher’s Prior Beliefs.” Journal of Political Economy 93 (2): 417–425.Google Scholar

McNutt, Marcia. 2015. “Editorial Retraction.” Science 348 (6239): 1100.Google Scholar

McNutt, Marcia. 2016. “Taking up TOP.” Science 352 (6290): 1147.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J. and Stephen M, Walt. 2013. “Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing is Bad for International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 427–457.Google Scholar

Medvetz, Thomas. 2012. Think Tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mellins, Claude A., Walsh, Katie, Sarvet, Aaron, Wall, Melanie, Gilbert, Louisa, Santelli, John S., Martie Thompson, Patrick Wilson, Shamus Khan, Stephanie Benson, Karimata Bah, Kathy A. Kaufman, Leigh Reardon and Jennifer S. Hirsch. 2017. “Sexual Assault Incidents among College Undergraduates: Prevalence and Factors Associated with Risk.” PLoS ONE 12 (11): e0186471.Google Scholar

Meltzer, Allan and Richard, Scott. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914–927.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1943. “TIME-Readership and the Influence Structure of Dover, N.J.” Bureau of Applied Social Research. Columbia University. B-0187.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1949. “Patterns of Influence: A Study of Interpersonal Influence and of Communication Behavior in a Local Community.” Pp. 180–219 in Lazarsfeld, Paul and Stanton, Frank (eds), Communications Research 1948–1949. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1957. “Some Preliminaries to a Sociology of Medical Education.” Pp. 3–79 in Merton, Robert K., Reader, George and Kendall, Patricia (eds), The Student-Physician. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1959. “Notes on Problem-Finding in Sociology.” Pp. ix–xxxiv in Merton, Robert K., Broom, Leonard and Cottrell, Leonard (eds), Sociology Today. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1968a. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1968b. Social Theory and Social Structure. Enlarged ed. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1973a. “Age, Aging, and Age Structure in Science”. Pp. 497–559 in Robert K. Merton (ed.), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1973b. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. “Socially Expected Durations: A Case Study of Concept Formation in Sociology”. Pp. 262–83 in Powell, Walter W. and Robbins, Richard (eds), Conflict and Consensus: In Honor of Lewis A. Coser. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1987a. “The Focussed Interview and Focus Groups: Continuities and Discontinuities.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51 (4):550–566.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1987b. “Three Fragments from a Sociologist’s Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials.” Annual Review of Sociology 3: 1–29.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1988. “The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property.” Isis 79 (4): 606–623.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. and Barber, Elinor. 2006. The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. and Kendall, Patricia. 1946. “The Focused Interview.” American Journal of Sociology 51: 541–557.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K., Marjorie, Fiske and Kendall, Patricia. 1956. The Focused Interview: A Manual of Problems and Procedures. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Mervis, Jeffrey. 2014a. “How Two Economists Got Direct Access to IRS Tax Records.” Science | AAAS. May 20. www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/05/how-two-economists-got-direct-access-irs-tax-records.Google Scholar

Mervis, Jeffrey. 2014b. “Why Null Results Rarely See the Light of Day.” Science 345 (6200): 992.Google Scholar

Michener, William K. 2015. “Ten Simple Rules for Creating a Good Data Management Plan.” PLoS Computational Biology 11 (10): e1004525.Google Scholar

Miguel, Edward, Camerer, Colin, Casey, Katherine, Cohen, Joshua, Esterling, Kevin M., Gerber, Alan, Glennerster, Rachel Don P. Green, Macartan Humphreys and Guido Impens. 2014. “Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research.” Science 343 (6166): 30–31.Google Scholar

Miguel, Edward and Kremer, Michael. 2004. “Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities.” Econometrica 72 (1): 159–217.Google Scholar

Miguel, Edward and Satyanath, Shanker. 2011. “Re-Examining Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict.” American Economic Journal. Applied Economics 3 (4): 228–232.Google Scholar

Miguel, Edward, Satyanath, Shanker and Sergenti, Ernest. 2004. “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 112 (4): 725–753.Google Scholar

Miller, Alan S. and Stark, Rodney. 2002. “Gender and Religiousness: Can Socialization Explanations Be Saved?” American Journal of Sociology 107 (6): 1399–1423.Google Scholar

Mills, Charles Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mills, Charles Wright. 2014 [1997]. The Racial Contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Mingers, John and Xu, Fang. 2010. “The Drivers of Citations in Management Science Journals.” European Journal of Operational Research 205 (2): 422–430.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin and Hesli, Vicki L.. 2013. “Women Don’t Ask? Women Don’t Say No? Bargaining and Service in the Political Science Profession.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (2): 355–369.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, Samantha, Lange and Brus, Holly. 2013. “Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 485–492.Google Scholar

Mitroff, Ian I. 1974. “Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 39(4): 579–595.Google Scholar

Mittelstaedt, Robert A. and Zorn, Thomas S. 1984. “Econometric Replication: Lessons from the Experimental Sciences.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 23 (1): 9–15.Google Scholar

Mizon, Grayham E. and Richard, Jean-Francois. 1986. “The Encompassing Principle and Its Application to Testing Non-Nested Hypotheses.” Econometrica 54 (3): 657–678.Google Scholar

Moffitt, Robert A. 2016. “In Defense of the NSF Economics Program.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (3): 213–234.Google Scholar

Moher, David, Jones, Alison and Lepage, Leah, and for the CONSORT Group. 2001. “Use of the Consort Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials: A Comparative before-and-after Evaluation.” Journal of the American Medical Association 285 (15): 1992–1995.Google Scholar

Moher, David, Schulz, Kenneth F. and Altman, Douglas G. 2001. “The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel Group Randomized Trials.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 1 (1): 2.Google Scholar

Monogan, James E. 2013. “A Case for Registering Studies of Political Outcomes: An Application in the 2010 House Elections.” Political Analysis 21 (1): 21–37.Google Scholar

Monroe, Kristen Renwick and Chiu, William F.. 2010. “Gender Equality in the Academy: The Pipeline Problem.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (2): 303–308.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Paul, Grant, Sean, Hopewell, Sally, Macdonald, Geraldine, Moher, David, Michie, Susan and Mayo-Wilson, Evan. 2013. “Protocol for CONSORT-SPI: An Extension for Social and Psychological Interventions.” Implementation Science 8 (1): 99.Google Scholar

Mookerjee, Rajen. 2006. “A Meta-Analysis of the Export Growth Hypothesis.” Economics Letters 91 (3): 395–401.Google Scholar

Moore, Alan J. and Beckerman, Andrew. 2016. “Ecology and Evolution in an Open World (or: Why Supplementary Data are Evil).” Ecology and Evolution 6 (9): 2655–2656.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 2010. “Active Citation: A Precondition for Replicable Qualitative Research.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (01): 29–35.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 2012. “Active Citation and Qualitative Political Science.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 10 (Spring): 33–37.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 2013. “Did Power Politics Cause European Integration? Realist Theory Meets Qualitative Methods.” Security Studies 22(4): 773–790.Google Scholar

Moreton, Bethany. 2008. “Make Payroll, Not War: Business Culture as Youth Culture.” In Schulman, Bruce and Zelizer, Julian (eds), Rightward Bound: Making America Conservative in the 1970s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Morey, Richard D., Chambers, Christopher D., Etchells, Peter J., Harris, Christine R., Hoekstra, Rink, Lakens, Daniel, Lewandowsky, Stephan, et al. 2015. “The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: Incentivising Open Research Practices through Peer Review.” Royal Society for Open Science 3: 150547.Google Scholar

Morgan, Kimberly. 2006. Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Work-Family Policy in Western Europe and the United States. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, Stephen L. and Christophere, Winship. 2015. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research, 2d 3d. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Morrison, Denton and Henkel, Ramon (eds). 1970. The Significance Test Controversy. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M. and Tabares, Tressa E.. 1999. Correction to “The Political Determinants of International Trade.” American Political Science Review 93 (December): 931–933.Google Scholar

Moses, Stephen, F. A. Plummer, Je Bradley, Jo Ndinyaachola, Njd Nagelkerke and Ar Ronald. 1994. “The Association between Lack of Male Circumcision and Risk for HIV Infection: A Review of the Epidemiological Data.” Sexually Transmitted Diseases 21 (4): 201–210.Google Scholar

Mosley, Layna (ed.) 2013. “Introduction. ‘Just Talk to People’? Interviews in Contemporary Political Science.” In Interview Research in Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Muller, Jerry Z. 2018. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mulrow, Cynthia D. 1994. “Systematic Reviews: Rationale for Systematic Reviews.” British Medical Journal 309: 597–599.Google Scholar

Munck, Gerardo L. 1998. “Canons of Research Design in Qualitative Analysis.” Studies in Comparative International Development 33 (3): 18–45.Google Scholar

Munck, Gerardo L. and Snyder, Richard. 2007. Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Munnell, Alicia H., Tootell, Geoffrey M. B., Browne, Lynn E. and McEneaney, James. 1996. “Mortgage Lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA Data.” American Economic Review 86 (1): 25–53.Google Scholar

Nagendran, Myura, Pereira, Tiago V., Kiew, Grace, Altman, Douglas G., Maruthappu, Mahiben, Ioannidis, John P. A. and McCulloch, Peter. 2016. “Very Large Treatment Effects in Randomised Trials as an Empirical Marker to Indicate whether Subsequent Trials are Necessary: Meta-Epidemiological Assessment.” British Medical Journal 355: i5432.Google Scholar

Narang, Vipin and Nelson, Rebecca M.. 2009. “Who are these Belligerent Democratizers? Reassessing the Impact of Democratization on War.” International Organization 63 (Spring): 357–379.Google Scholar

Nash, George. 1976. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Ensuring the Utility and Integrity of Research Data in a Digital Age, and Institute of Medicine. 2009. Research Data in the Digital Age. National Academies Press (US). www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215259/.Google Scholar

National Research Council. 1999. A Question of Balance: Private Rights and the Public Interest in Scientific and Technical Databases. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9692.Google Scholar

National Science Board. 2005. Long-Lived Data Collections: Enabling Research and Education in the 20st Century. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar

National Science Foundation (NSF). 2016a. “Definition of Transformative Research.” Downloaded on September 22, 2016 from www.nsf.gov/about/transformative_research/definition.jsp.Google Scholar

National Science Foundation (NSF). 2016b. “Where to Submit Potentially Transformative Research Proposals.” Downloaded on September14, 2016 from http://nsf.gov/about/transformative_research/submit.jsp.Google Scholar

National Science Foundation (NSF). 2018a. “News Release 18–082. ‘NSF announces new measures to protect research community from harassment.’” Downloaded on September 22, 2018 from www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=296610.Google Scholar

National Science Foundation (NSF). 2018b. “Survey of Earned Doctorates.” www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsf16300/data-tables.cfm, accessed April 2018.Google Scholar

Necker, Sarah. 2014. “Scientific Misbehavior in Economics.” Research Policy 43 (10): 1747–1759.Google Scholar

Nelson, Leif D., Simmons, Joseph P. and Simonsohn, Uri. 2012. “Let’s Publish Fewer Papers.” Psychological Inquiry 23: 291–293.Google Scholar

Neumark, David. 2001. “The Employment Effects of Minimum Wages: Evidence from a Prespecified Research Design.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 40 (1): 121–144.Google Scholar

Neumark, David and Wascher, William. 1998. “Is the Time-Series Evidence on Minimum Wage Effects Contaminated by Publication Bias?” Economic Inquiry 36 (3): 458–470.Google Scholar

Neumark, David and Wascher, William. 2000. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Comment.” American Economic Review 90 (5): 1362–1396.Google Scholar

Neumark, David, Ian Salas, J. M. and Wascher, William. 2014. “Revisiting the Minimum Wage – Employment Debate: Throwing Out the Baby with the Bathwater?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 67 (3 suppl): 608–648.Google Scholar

Newcomb, Theodore. 1943. Personality and Social Change: Attitude Formation in a Student Community. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar

Nexon, Daniel. 2013. “The Citation Gap: Results of a Self-Experiment.” Duck of Minerva, August 16. http://duckofminerva.com/2013/08/the-citation-gapresults-of-a-self-experiment.html.Google Scholar

Nickerson, Raymond. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2: 175–220.Google Scholar

Nicolaisen, Jeppe. 2007. “Citation Analysis.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41 (1): 609–641.Google Scholar

Nijkamp, Peter and Poot, Jacques. 2005. “The Last Word on the Wage Curve?” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 421–450.Google Scholar

Nixon, Lucia A. and Robinson, Michael D.. 1999. “The Educational Attainment of Young Women: Role Model Effects of Female High School Faculty.” Demography 36(2): 185–194.Google Scholar

Nofsinger, John R. 2009. “Retraction Notice to ‘Social Mood: The Stock Market and Political Cycles’ [J. Socio-Econ. 36 (2007) 734–744].” Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (3): 547.Google Scholar

North, Douglass C. 1986. “The New Institutional Economics.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 142 (1): 230–237.Google Scholar

North, Douglass C. and Weingast, Barry R.. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49 (4) (December): 803–832.Google Scholar

Northcott, Robert. 2017. “Partial Explanations in Social Science.” Pp. 130–153 in Harold Kincaid (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nosek, Brian A., Alter, George, Banks, George C., Borsboom, Denny, Bowman, Sara D., Breckler, Steven J and Buck, Stuart. 2015. “Promoting an Open Research Culture.” Science 348 (6242): 1422–1425.Google Scholar

Nosek, Brian A. and Bar-Anan, Yoav. 2012. “Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication.” Psychological Inquiry 23: 217–243.Google Scholar

Nosek, Brian A. and Lakens, Daniël. 2014. “Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results.” Social Psychology 45 (3): 137–141.Google Scholar

Nosek, Brian A., Spies, Jeffrey R. and Mortyl, Matt. 2012. “Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth over Publishability.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7: 615–637.Google Scholar

“Notice to Our Readers.” 1984. Quarterly Journal of Economics 99 (2): 383–384.Google Scholar

Nyhan, Brendan. 2015. “Increasing the Credibility of Political Science Research: A Proposal for Journal Reforms.” PS: Political Science and Politics 48 (Supplement S1): 78–83.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Peter C. 1984. “Procedures for Comparing Samples with Multiple Endpoints.” Biometrics 40 (4): 1079–1087.Google Scholar

Offen, Karen M. 2000. European Feminisms, 1700–1950: A Political History. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, Keith. 2007. “An Historical Perspective on Meta-analysis: Dealing Quantitatively with Varying Study Results.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 100(12): 579–82.Google Scholar

Olken, Benjamin A. 2015. “Promises and Perils of Pre-Analysis Plans.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 61–80.Google Scholar

Olken, Benjamin A., Onishi, Junko and Wong, Susan. 2012. “Should Aid Reward Performance? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Health and Education in Indonesia.” Working Paper 17892. National Bureau of Economic Research. www.nber.org/papers/w17892.Google Scholar

Open Science Collaboration. 2012. “An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 657–660.Google Scholar

Open Science Collaboration. 2015. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349: aac4716.Google Scholar

Orazbayev, Sultan. 2017. “Diversity and Collaboration in Economics.” Unpublished, UCL SSEES.Google Scholar

Østby, Gudrun, Håvard, Strand, Ragnhild, Nordås and Gleditsch, Nils Petter. 2013. “Gender Gap or Gender Bias in Peace Research? Publication Patterns and Citation Rates for Journal of Peace Research, 1983–2008.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 493–506.Google Scholar

Osterloh, Margit and Frey, Bruno S. 2015. “Ranking Games.” Evaluation Review 39 (1): 102–129.Google Scholar

Pagan, Adrian. 1987. “Three Econometric Methodologies: A Critical Appraisal.” Journal of Economic Surveys 1 (1–2): 3–23.Google Scholar

Palattella, John. 2016. “Svetlana Alexievich’s Voices,” The Nation. July 6. www.thenation.com/article/svetlana-alexievichs-voices/.Google Scholar

Paluck, Elizabeth. 2010. “The Promising Integration of Qualitative Methods and Field Experiments.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 628 (1): 59.Google Scholar

Pampel, Fred. 2004. “Exploratory Data Analysis”. Pp. 359–60 in Lewis-Beck, Michael, Bryman, Alan and Liao, Tim F. (eds), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. Volume 1. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Pape, Robert A. 2003. “The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism.” American Political Science Review 97(August): 343–361.Google Scholar

Parish, Susan L., Seltzer, Marsha Mailick, Greenberg, Jan S. and Floyd, Frank. 2004. “Economic Implications of Caregiving at Midlife: Comparing Parents with and without Children who have Developmental Disabilities.” Mental Retardation 42 (6) : 413–426.Google Scholar

Park, Robert E. 1937. “Review of John Dollard, Caste and Class in a Southern Town.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 193 (September): 210–211.Google Scholar

Parry, Odette and Mauthner, Natasha. 2005. “Back to Basics: Who Re-Uses Qualitative Data and Why?” Sociology 39 (2): 337–342.Google Scholar

Parry, Odette and Mauthner, Natasha. 2004. “Whose Data Are They Anyway? Practical, Legal and Ethical Issues in Archiving Qualitative Research Data.” Sociology 38 (1): 139–152.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. 1938. “The Role of Theory in Social Research.” American Sociological Review 3 (1) (February): 13–20.Google Scholar

Pashler, Harold and Harris, Christine R. 2012. “Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7: 531–536.Google Scholar

Pateman, Carole and Mills, Charles Wade. 2007. Contract and Domination. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Patil, Prasad, Peng, Roger D. and Leek, Jeffrey T.. 2016. “What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (4): 539–544.Google Scholar

Pearl, Judea and Mackenzie, Dana. 2018. The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Peic, Goran. 2014. “Civilian Defense Forces, State Capacity, and Government Victory in Counterinsurgency Wars.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 37 (2): 162–184.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1906. “Lecture I of a Planned Course.” Harvard University, Houghton Library, MS 857.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1929. “Guessing,” The Hound and Horn 2 (3) (Spring): 267−285.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1934. Vol. 5 of Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1992. “Training in Reasoning.” Pp. 181–196 in Charles Sanders Peirce, Kenneth Laine Ketner and Hilary Putnam (eds), Reasoning and the Logic of Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pereira, Tiago and Ioannidis, John P. A 2011. “Statistically Significant Meta-Analyses of Clinical Trials have Modest Credibility and Inflated Effects.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64 (10): 1060–1069.Google Scholar

Perneger, Thomas V. 2004. “Relation between Online ‘Hit Counts’ and Subsequent Citations: Prospective Study of Research Papers in the BMJ.” British Medical Journal 329 (7465): 546–547.Google Scholar

Pesaran, Hashem. 2003. “Introducing a Replication Section.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 18 (1): 111.Google Scholar

Peterson, David. 2015. “All that is Solid: Bench-Building at the Frontiers of Two Experimental Sciences.” American Sociological Review 80 (6): 1201–1225.Google Scholar

Peterson, David. 2016. “The Baby Factory: Difficult Research Objects, Disciplinary Standards, and the Production of Statistical Significance.” Socius 2: 1–10.Google Scholar

Petticrew, Mark and Roberts, Helen. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. 2016. “A Wider Ideological Gap Between More and Less Educated Adults.” www.people-press.org/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-gap-between-more-and-less-educated-adults/.Google Scholar

Phillips, Peter C. B. 1988. “Reflections on Econometric Methodology.” Economic Record 64 (4): 344–359.Google Scholar

Piñeiro, Rafael and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2016. “Pre-Analysis Plans for Qualitative Research.” Revista de Ciencia Política 36 (3): 785–796.Google Scholar

Piñeiro, Rafael, Pérez, Verónica and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2016. “Pre-Analysis Plan: The Broad Front: A Mass-Based Leftist Party in Latin America: History, Organization and Resilience.” Posted at EGAP Registry, July 19. https://egap.org/registration/1989.Google Scholar

Platt, Jennifer. 1996. A History of Sociological Research Methods in America, 1920−1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Platt, Jennifer. 2002. “The History of the Interview.” Pp. 33–54 in Gubrium, Jaber and Holstein, James (eds), Handbook of Interview Research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Platt, Jennifer. 2011. Interview by the Author on the Pilot Study. Los Angeles, August 21.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Portenoy, Jason, Hullman, Jessica and West, Jevin D.. 2016. “Leveraging Citation Networks to Visualize Scholarly Influence Over Time,” November. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2017.00008.Google Scholar

Posen, Barry R. 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Powdthavee, Nattavudh, Riyanto, Yohanes E. and Knetsch, Jack L.. 2018. “Lower-Rated Publications Do Lower Academics’ Judgments of Publication Lists: Evidence from a Survey Experiment of Economists.” Journal of Economic Psychology 66: 33–44.Google Scholar

Press, Daryl G. 2005. Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Priem, Jason. 2014. “Altmetrics.” Pp. 263–287 in Cronin, Blaise and Sugimoto, Cassidy R (eds), Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Raftery, Adrian E. 1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.” Sociological Methodology 25: 111–163.Google Scholar

Rao, Inna Kedage Ravichandra 2011. “Relations Among the Number of Citations, References and Authors: Revisited.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics (WIS) and COLLNET Meeting, September 20–23, Istanbul Bilgi University, Turkey, 55–66.Google Scholar

Rask, Kevin N. and Bailey, Elizabeth M. 2002. “Are Faculty Role Models? Evidence from Major Choice in an Undergraduate Institution.” Journal of Economic Education 33 (2): 99–124.Google Scholar

Rauchhaus, Robert. 2009. “Evaluating the Nuclear Peace Hypothesis: A Quantitative Approach.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (2): 258–277.Google Scholar

Redding, Richard. 2012. “Likes Attract: The Sociopolitical Groupthink of (Social) Psychologists.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7: 512.Google Scholar

“Redundant Publishing – Australasian Journal of Regional Studies.” 2011. Regional Studies 45 (2): 282.Google Scholar

Reinhart, Carmen M. and Rogoff, Kenneth S.. 2010. “Growth in a Time of Debt.” American Economic Review 100 (2): n. p.Google Scholar

Reiter, Dan. 2012. “Democracy, Deception, and Entry into War.” Security Studies 21 (4): 594–623.Google Scholar

Reiter, Dan. 2013. “Response to Trachtenberg, Schuessler, and Kaiser.” Democracy, Deception, and Entry into War, ISSF Roundtable 5 (4). https://issforum.org/roundtables/5-4-democracy-deception-war.Google Scholar

Reiter, Dan and Stam, Allan C.. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Reiter, Dan, Stam, Allan C. and Horowitz, Michael C.. 2016a. “A Revised Look at Interstate Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 60 (5): 956–976.Google Scholar

Reiter, Dan, Stam, Allan C. and Horowitz, Michael C.. 2016b. “A Deeper Look at Interstate War Data version 1.1.” Research and Politics 3 (4): 1–3.Google Scholar

Renear, Allen H., Sacchi, Simone and Wickett, Karen M. 2010. “Definitions of Dataset in the Scientific and Technical Literature.” In Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem. Volume 47, 81: 1–81: 4. ASIS&T ‘10. Silver Springs, MD: American Society for Information Science.Google Scholar

“Retraction Statement: ‘Correction or Comparison? The Effects of Prime Awareness on Social Judgments’, by M. Maringer and D. Stapel.” 2015. European Journal of Social Psychology, January, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2173.Google Scholar

“Retraction Statement and Authors’ Apology.” 2009. Regional Studies 43 (1): 156.Google Scholar

Rikleen, Lauren Stiller. 2015. “Women Lawyers Continue to Lag Behind Male Colleagues: Report of the Ninth Annual NAWL National Survey of Retention and Promotion of Women in Law Firms.” Women Lawyers Journal 100 (4): 25.Google Scholar

Rivera, Lauren A. 2017. “When Two Bodies are (Not) a Problem: Gender and Relationship Status Discrimination in Academic Hiring.” American Sociological Review 82 (6): 1111–1138.Google Scholar

Roberts, Colin J. 2005. “Issues in Meta-Regression Analysis: An Overview.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 295–298.Google Scholar

Robles, Alfredo C. 1993. “How” International” Are International Relations Syllabi?” PS: Political Science and Politics 26 (3): 526–528.Google Scholar

Robson, Barbara J. and Mousquès, Aurélie. 2014. “Predicting citation counts of environmental modelling papers.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), San Diego.Google Scholar

Rogowski, Ronald. 1995. “The Role of Theory and Anomaly in Social-Scientific Inference.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 467–470.Google Scholar

Romano, Joseph P., Shaikh, Azeem M. and Wolf, Michael. 2008. “Control of the False Discovery Rate under Dependence Using the Bootstrap and Subsampling.” TEST 17 (3): 417.Google Scholar

Rosato, Sebastian. 2012. Europe United: Power Politics and the Making of the European Community. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Rose, Andrew K. and Stanley, Tom D.. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Common Currencies on International Trade*.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 347–365.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Robert. 1978. “Combining Results of Independent Studies.” Psychological Bulletin 85 (1): 185.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Robert. 1979. “The File Drawer Problem and Tolerance for Null Results.” Psychological Bulletin 86 (3): 638–641.Google Scholar

Ross, Michael. 2006. “Is Democracy Good for the Poor?” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 860–874.Google Scholar

Rossiter, Margaret W. 1993. “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science 23 (2): 325–341.Google Scholar

Roth, Louise Marie and Kroll, Jeffrey C.. 2007. “Risky Business: Assessing Risk Preference Explanations for Gender Differences in Religiosity.” American Sociological Review 72 (2): 205–220.Google Scholar

Rothenberg, Marc. 2013. “Funding High Risk Proposals at the National Science Foundation: A Brief History.” July 3. http://robohub.org/funding-high-risk-proposals-at-the-national-science-foundation-a-brief-history/.Google Scholar

Rothman, Stanley, Lichter, S. Robert and Nevitte, Neil. 2005. “Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty.” Forum 3: art 2.Google Scholar

Rothstein, Donna S. 2007. “High School Employment and Youths’ Academic Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 42 (1): 194–213.Google Scholar

Rowhani-Farid, Anisa, Allen, Michelle and Barnett, Adrian G.. 2017. “What Incentives Increase Data Sharing in Health and Medical Research? A Systematic Review.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 2 (1). doi:10.1186/s41073-017-0028-9.Google Scholar

Rubin, Donald. B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66(5): 688–701.Google Scholar

Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2009. Usable Theory: Analytic Tools for Social and Political Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rule, James B. 1997. Theory and Progress in Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sachs, Jeffrey and Warner, Andrew. 1997. “Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth.” Center for International Development and Harvard Institute for International Development. www.cid.harvard.edu/ciddata/warner_files/natresf5.pdf.Google Scholar

Sala-i-Martin, Xavier X. 1997. “I Just Ran Two Million Regressions.” American Economic Review 87 (2): 178–183.Google Scholar

Sala-i-Martin, Xavier X., Doppelhofer, Gernot and Miller, Ronald I.. 2004. “Determinants of Long-Term Growth: A Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates (BACE) Approach.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 813–835.Google Scholar

Samuels, David. 2013. “Book Citations Count.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (4): 785–790.Google Scholar

Samuels, David and Teele, Dawn. 2018. “New Medium, Same Story: Gender Gaps in Book Publishing.” Working paper. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3283107.Google Scholar

Sanday, Peggy Reeves. 1990. Fraternity Gang Rape: Sex, Brotherhood, and Privilege on Campus. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar

Sapiro, Virginia and Campbell, David 2018. “American Political Science Association Committee on Professional Ethics, Rights, and Freedoms Report on the 2017 APSA Survey on Sexual Harassment at Annual Meeting.” American Political Science Association mimeo.Google Scholar

Sarkees, Meredith Reid and Wayman, Frank Whelon. 2010. Resort to War, 1816–2007. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Sarsons, Heather. 2015. “Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work.” Harvard Economics Department Working Paper. December 3.Google Scholar

Sarsons, Heather. 2017. “Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia.” American Economic Review 107 (5): 141–145.Google Scholar

Schiebinger, Linda L., Henderson, Andrea D. and Gilmartin, Shannon K.. 2008. “Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know.” Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Frank L. 1996. “Statistical Significance Testing and Cumulative Knowledge in Psychology: Implications for Training of Researchers.” Psychological Methods 1 (2): 115–129.Google Scholar

Schnall, Simone. 2014. “Social Media and the Crowd-Sourcing of Social Psychology.” www.psychol.cam.ac.uk/cece/blog.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q. and Wagemann, Claudius. 2012. “Set-Theoretic Methods for Social Sciences.” In Colin Elman, John Gerring and James Mahoney (eds), Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schuessler, John M. 2015. Deceit on the Road to War: Presidents, Politics, and American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Schulz, Kenneth F. and Grimes, David A.. 2005. “Multiplicity in Randomised Trials II: Subgroup and Interim Analyses.” The Lancet 365 (9471): 1657–1661.Google Scholar

Schulz, Kenneth F., Altman, Douglas G. and Moher, David. 2010. “CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63(8): 834–840.Google Scholar

Schwabish, Jonathan A. 2014. “An Economist’s Guide to Visualizing Data.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (1): 209–233. doi:10.1257/jep.28.1.209.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Christine R. and Gonalons-Pons, Pilar 2016. “Trends in Relative Earnings and Marital Dissolution: Are Wives Who Outearn Their Husbands Still More Likely to Divorce?” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2 (4): 218–236.Google Scholar

Schwarz, Greg J. and Kennicutt, Robert C., Jr. 2004. “Demographic and Citation Trends in Astrophysical Journal Papers and Preprints.” arXiv preprint astro-ph/0411275.Google Scholar

Schwarz, Gideon. 1978. “Estimating the Dimension of a Model.” The Annals of Statistics 6 (2): 461–464.Google Scholar

Seale, Clive. 1999. The Quality of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Selltiz, Claire, Jahoda, Marie, Deutsch, Morton and Cook, Stuart. 1959. Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Selvin, Hanan. 1957. “A Critique of Tests of Significance in Survey Research.” American Sociological Review 22 (5): 519–527.Google Scholar

Sewell, William, Jr. 2005. “The Political Unconscious of Social and Cultural History, or Confessions of a Former Quantitative Historian.” In George Steinmetz (ed.), The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Shachar, Ron and Nalebuff, Barry. 2004. “Verifying the Solution from a Nonlinear Solver: A Case Study: Comment.” American Economic Review 94 (1): 382–390.Google Scholar

Shames, Shauna and Wise, Tess. 2017. “Gender Diversity and Methods in Political Science: A Theory of Selection and Survival Biases.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (3): 811–823.Google Scholar

Shashok, Karen. 2005. “Standardization vs Diversity: How Can We Push Peer Review Research Forward?” Medscape General Medicine 7 (1): 11.Google Scholar

Shema, Hadas. 2014. “An Introduction to Open Peer Review.” Information Culture, Scientific American, June 28. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/information-culture/an-introduction-to-open-peer-review/.Google Scholar

Shen, Helen. 2014. “Interactive Notebooks: Sharing the Code.” Nature 515 (7525): 151–152.Google Scholar

Shields, Jon and Dunn Sr, Joshua. 2016. Passing on the Right: Conservative Professors in the Progressive University. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shotton, David. 2010. “CiTO, the Citation Typing Ontology.” Journal of Biomedical Semantics 1 (1): S6.Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S. and Taagepera, Rein. 2017. Votes from Seats: Logical Models of Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Silberzahn, Raphael and Uhlmann, Eric L.. 2015. “Crowdsourced Research: Many Hands Make Tight Work.” Nature 526 (7572): 189–191.Google Scholar

Simien, Evelyn M. and Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2011. “Mini-Symposium: Intersectionality Research.” Political Research Quarterly 64: 185–186.Google Scholar

Simmons, Joseph P., Nelson, Leif D. and Simonsohn, Uri. 2011. “False-Positive Psychology Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.” Psychological Science 22 (11): 1359–1366.Google Scholar

Simmons, Joseph P., Nelson, Leif D. and Simonsohn, Uri. 2012. “A 21 Word Solution.” Dialogue: The Official Newsletter of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology 26 (2): 4–7.Google Scholar

Simms, Stephanie. 2018. ‘Scoping Machine-Actionable DMPs’. DMPTool Blog (blog). July 9. https://blog.dmptool.org/2018/07/09/scoping-machine-actionable-dmps/.Google Scholar

Simms, Stephanie, Jones, Sarah, Ashley, Kevin, Ribeiro, Marta, Chodacki, John, Abrams, Stephen and Strong, Marisa. 2016. “Roadmap: A Research Data Management Advisory Platform.” Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: 1–8.Google Scholar

Simon, Joshua. 2018. “From the American System to the Anglo-Saxon Union: Scientific Racism and Supra-Nationalism in Nineteenth Century North America.” Pp. 72–94 in Andrew J. Arato, Jean L. Cohen and Astrid von Busekist (eds), Forms of Pluralism and Democratic Constitutionalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Simons, Daniel J. 2014. “The Value of Direct Replication.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 (1): 76–80.Google Scholar

Simonsohn, Uri. 2013. “Just Post It: The Lesson From Two Cases of Fabricated Data Detected by Statistics Alone.” Psychological Science 24 (10): 1875–1888.Google Scholar

Simonsohn, Uri. 2015. “Small Telescopes Detectability and the Evaluation of Replication Results.” Psychological Science 26 (5): 559–569.Google Scholar

Simonsohn, Uri, Simmons, Joseph P. and Nelson, Leif D.. 2015a. “Better P-Curves: Making P-Curve Analysis More Robust to Errors, Fraud, and Ambitious P-Hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (6): 1146–1152.Google Scholar

Simonsohn, Uri, Simmons, Joseph P. and Nelson, Leif D.. 2015b. “Specification Curve: Descriptive and Inferential Statistics on All Reasonable Specifications.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2694998. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar

Simonsohn, Uri, Nelson, Leif D., and Simmons, Joseph P. 2014a. “P-Curve: A Key to the File-Drawer.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (2): 534–547.Google Scholar

Simonsohn, Uri, Nelson, Leif D., and Simmons, Joseph P. 2014b. “P-Curve and Effect Size Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 (6): 666–681.Google Scholar

Simowitz, Roslyn. 1998. “Evaluating Conflict Research on the Diffusion of War.” Journal of Peace Research 35 (2) (March): 211–230.Google Scholar

Sinisi, Sandra E., Polley, Eric C, Petersen, Maya L, Rhee, Soo-Yon and der Laan, Mark J. van. 2007. “Super Learning: An Application to the Prediction of HIV-1 Drug Resistance.” Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 (1). doi:10.2202/1544–6115.1240.Google Scholar

Siskind, Frederic B. 1977. “Minimum Wage Legislation in the United States: Comment.” Economic Inquiry 15 (1): 135–138.Google Scholar

Sisson, Richard and Rose, Leo E.. 1990. War and Secession: Pakistan, India, and the Creation of Bangladesh. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Sjöblom, Gunnar. 1977. “The Cumulation Problem in Political Science.” European Journal of Political Science 5 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar

Sjöblom, Gunnar. 1997. “The Cumulation Problem Revisited.” European Journal of Political Research 31 (1) (February): 78–81.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda. 1980. “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal.” Politics and Society 10 (2): 155–201.Google Scholar

Slater, Dan. 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smit, Eefke, Hoeven, Jeffrey van der and Giaretta, David. 2011. “Avoiding a Digital Dark Age for Data: Why Publishers Should Care about Digital Preservation.” Learned Publishing 24 (1): 35–49.Google Scholar

Smith, Christian. 2014. The Sacred Project of American Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Dorothy. 1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Kevin. 2005. “Data Don’t Matter? Academic Research and School Choice.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (2) (June): 285–299.Google Scholar

Smith, Mary Lee. 1980. “Publication Bias and Meta-Analysis.” Evaluation in Education 4: 22–24.Google Scholar

Smith, Robert B. 2008. Cumulative Social Inquiry. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven Rathgeb. 2014. “Reflections on the Status of the Field.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (3): 741–742.Google Scholar

Smulders, Yvo M. 2013. “A Two-Step Manuscript Submission Process Can Reduce Publication Bias.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66 (9): 946–947.Google Scholar

Snyder, Jack and Borghard, Erica D.. 2011. “The Cost of Empty Threats: A Penny, Not a Pound.” American Political Science Review 105 (03): 437–456.Google Scholar

Snyder, Thomas D., de Brey, Cristobal and Dillow, Sally A.. 2016. “Digest of Education Statistics.” National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017094.Google Scholar

Soifer, Hillel David. 2015. State Building in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Somekh, Bridget and Lewin, Cathy. 2005. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Stanley, Tom D. 2005. “Beyond Publication Bias.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 309–345.Google Scholar

Stanley, Tom D. 2008. “Meta-Regression Methods for Detecting and Estimating Empirical Effects in the Presence of Publication Selection.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 70 (1): 103–127.Google Scholar

Stanley, Tom D. and Doucouliagos, Hristos. 2010. “Picture This: A Simple Graph That Reveals Much Ado About Research.” Journal of Economic Surveys 24 (1): 170–191.Google Scholar

Stanley, Tom D. and Doucouliagos, Hristos. 2012. Meta-Regression Analysis in Economics and Business. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stanley, Tom D., Doucouliagos, Hristos, Giles, Margaret, Heckemeyer, Jost H., Johnston, Robert J., Laroche, Patrice, Nelson, Jon P. et al. 2013. “Meta-Analysis of Economics Research Reporting Guidelines.” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (2): 390–394.Google Scholar

Stapel, Diederik. 2014. “Faking Science: A True Story of Academic Fraud.” Translated by Nicholas Brown. http://nick.brown.free.fr/stapel/FakingScience-20161115.pdf.Google Scholar

Stark, David. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

“Statement of Retraction.” 2010. Journal of Economic Policy Reform 13 (4): 387.Google Scholar

“Statement of Retraction.” 2012. Applied Economics Letters 19 (16): 1649.Google Scholar

Stebbins, Robert. 2001. Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Qualitative Research Methods Series 48. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Steen, R. Grant. 2010. “Retractions in the Scientific Literature: Is the Incidence of Research Fraud Increasing?” Journal of Medical Ethics, December, jme.2010.040923. doi:10.1136/jme.2010.040923.Google Scholar

Steen, R. Grant, Casadevall, Arturo and Fang, Ferric C.. 2013. “Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?” PLoS ONE 8 (7): e68397.Google Scholar

Stegmaier, Mary, Palmer, Barbara and Assendelft, Laura Van. 2011. “Getting on the Board: The Presence of Women in Political Science Journal Editorial Positions.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (4): 799–804.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Steven J. and Steinberg, Sheila L.. 2005. Geographic Information Systems for the Social Sciences: Investigating Space and Place. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C. 2018. Twitter as Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, George (ed.). 2005. The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar

Stephan, Paula. 2012. “Research efficiency: Perverse incentives.” Nature 484 (7392): 29–31.Google Scholar

Sterling, Theodore D. 1959. “Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance – or Vice Versa.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 54 (285): 30–34.Google Scholar

Sterne, Jonathan. 2005. “C. Wright Mills, the Bureau for Applied Social Research, and the Meaning of Critical Scholarship.” Critical Studies Critical Methodologies 5 (1): 86–94.Google Scholar

Stevens, Mitchell L., Miller-Idriss, Cynthia and Shami, Seteney. 2018. Seeing the World: How US Universities Make Knowledge in a Global Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stock, Wendy A. 2017. “Trends in Economics and Other Undergraduate Majors.” American Economic Review 107 (5): 644–649.Google Scholar

Stodden, Victoria, Leisch, Friedrich and Peng, Roger D. 2014. Implementing Reproducible Research. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Stokes, Susan. 2001. Neoliberalism by Surprise: Mandates and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stouffer, Samuel and Lazarsfeld, Paul. 1937. Research Memorandum on the Family in the Depression. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar

Streb, Christoph. 2010. “Exploratory Case Study.” In Mills, Albert, Durepos, Gabrielle and Wiebe, Elden (eds), Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Reference.Google Scholar

Stroebe, Wolfgang, Postmes, Tom and Spears, Russell. 2012. “Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 670–688.Google Scholar

Stroebe, Wolfgang and Strack, Fritz. 2014. “The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 (1): 59–71.Google Scholar

Sugimoto, Cassidy R. and Larivière, Vincent. 2018. Measuring Research: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Ryan, Timmermann, Allan and White, Halbert. 1999. “Data-Snooping, Technical Trading Rule Performance, and the Bootstrap.” Journal of Finance 54 (5): 1647–1691.Google Scholar

Sumner, Jane. 2018. “The Gender Balance Assessment Tool (GBAT): A Web-Based Tool for Estimating Gender Balance in Syllabi and Bibliographies.” PS: Political Science and Politics 51 (2): 396–400.Google Scholar

Swaen, Gerald M. H., Carmichael, Neil and Doe, John. 2011. “Strengthening the Reliability and Credibility of Observational Epidemiology Studies by Creating an Observational Studies Register.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64: 481–486.Google Scholar

Swedberg, Richard. 2009. “Tocqueville as an Empirical Researcher.” Pp. 279–292 in Chaerkaouie, Mohammed and Hamilton, Peter (eds), Raymond Boudon: A Life in Sociology. Volume 1. Oxford: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar

Swedberg, Richard. 2014. The Art of Social Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Swedberg, Richard. 2016. “Before Theory Comes Theorizing or How to Make Social Science More Interesting.” British Journal of Sociology 67 (1): 5–70.Google Scholar

Sweeney, Latanya. 2002. “K-Anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy.” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10 (05): 557–570.Google Scholar

Taagepera, Rein. 2008. Making Social Sciences More Scientific: The Need for Predictive Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taichman, Darren B., Backus, J., Baethge, C. et al. 2016. “Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.” Journal of the American Medical Association 315 (5): 467–468.Google Scholar

Taubman, Sarah L., Allen, Heidi L., Wright, Bill J., Baicker, Katherine and Finkelstein, Amy N.. 2014. “Medicaid Increases Emergency-Department Use: Evidence from Oregon’s Health Insurance Experiment.” Science 343 (6168): 263–268.Google Scholar

Taylor, Shelley E. and Fiske, Susan T.. 1975. “Point of View and Perceptions of Causality.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (3): 439.Google Scholar

Teele, Dawn and Thelen, Kathleen. 2017. “Gender in the Journals: Methodology, Coauthorship, and Publication Patterns in Political Science’s Flagship Journals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 433–447.Google Scholar

Teles, Steven. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Testa, James. 2016. “Journal Selection Process.” Clarivate Analytics. https://clarivate.com/essays/journal-selection-process/.Google Scholar

Tetlock, Philip and Mitchell, Gregory. 2015. “Why So Few Conservatives and Should We Care?” Society 52: 28–34.Google Scholar

The Lancet. 2010. “Should Protocols for Observational Research Be Registered?” The Lancet 375 (9712): 348.Google Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen. 2019. “The American Precariat: U.S. Capitalism in Comparative Perspective” Perspectives on Politics 17 (1): 5–27.Google Scholar

Thomas, Duncan, Frankenberg, Elizabeth, Friedman, Jed, Habicht, Jean-Pierre, Hakimi, Mohammed, Jaswadi, Nathan Jones, Pelto, Gretel et al. 2003. “Iron Deficiency and the Well-Being of Older Adults: Early Results from a Randomized Nutrition Intervention.” Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meetings, April 2003, Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Thomas, Duncan, Frankenberg, Elizabeth, Friedman, Jed, Habicht, Jean-Pierre, Hakimi, Mohammed, Ingwersen, Nicholas, Jones, Nathan et al. 2006. “Causal Effect of Health on Labor Market Outcomes: Experimental Evidence.” UCLA CCPR Population Working Papers. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0g28k77w.Google Scholar

Thompson, Chastity Q. 2008. “Recruitment, Retention, and Mentoring Faculty of Color: The Chronicle Continues.” New Directions for Higher Education 143: 47–54.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Todeschini, Roberto and Baccini, Alberto. 2016. Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar

Toutkoushian, Robert K. and Conley, Valerie M.. 2005. “Progress for Women in Academe, Yet Inequities Persist: Evidence from NSOPF:99.” Research in Higher Education 46 (1): 1–28.Google Scholar

Tsang, Eric W. K. and Kwan, Kai-Man. 1999. “Replications and Theory Development in Organizational Science: A Critical Realist Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 24: 759–780.Google Scholar

Tucker, Joshua. 2014. “Experiments, Preregistration, and Journals.” On OUPblog. http://blog.oup.com/2014/09/pro-con-research-preregistration/.Google Scholar

Tudor, Carissa L. and Yashar, Deborah J. 2018. “Gender and the Editorial Process: World Politics, 2007–2017.” Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 759–780.Google Scholar

Tufte, Edward R. 2001. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar

Tukey, John Wilder. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Turner, Erick H., Matthews, Annette M., Linardatos, Eftihia, Tell, Robert A. and Rosenthal, Robert. 2008. “Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy.” New England Journal of Medicine 358 (3): 252–260.Google Scholar

Ulrich, Rolf and Miller, Jeff. 2015. “P-Hacking by Post Hoc Selection with Multiple Opportunities: Detectability by Skewness Test?: Comment on Simonsohn, Nelson, and Simmons (2014).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (6): 1137–1145.Google Scholar

Van Aert RCM, Van Assen MALM. 2017. “Bayesian Evaluation of Effect Size after Replicating an Original Study.” PLoS ONE 12 (4): e0175302.Google Scholar

Van der Veer, René, IJzendoorn, Marinus van and Valsiner, Jaan (eds). 1994. Reconstructing the Mind: Replicability in Research on Human Development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Van Noorden, Richard. 2010. “A Profusion of Measures.” Nature 465 (7300): 864–867.Google Scholar

Van Noorden, Richard. 2013. “New Record: 66 Journals Banned for Boosting Impact Factor with Self-Citations : News Blog.” Nature News Blog (blog). June 19. http://blogs.nature.com/news/2013/06/new-record-66-journals-banned-for-boosting-impact-factor-with-self-citations.html.Google Scholar

van Teijlingen, Edwin and Hundley, Vanora. 2001. “The Importance of Pilot Studies.” Social Research Update (University of Surrey), issue 35. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU35.html.Google Scholar

Vanclay, Jerome K. 2013. “Factors Affecting Citation Rates in Environmental Science.” Journal of Informetrics 7 (2): 265–271.Google Scholar

Vasilescu, Bogdan, Capiluppi, Andrea and Serebrenik, Alexander. 2014. “Gender, Representation and Online Participation: A Quantitative Study.” Interacting with Computers 26 (5): 488–511.Google Scholar

Verhagen, Josine and Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan. 2014. “Bayesian Tests to Quantify the Result of a Replication Attempt.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143: 1457–1475.Google Scholar

Viscusi, W. Kip. 2015. “The Role of Publication Selection Bias in Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life.” American Journal of Health Economics 1 (1): 27–52.Google Scholar

Vitalis, Robert. 2015. White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Vivalt, Eva. 2015. “The Trajectory of Specification Searching Across Methods and Disciplines.” http://evavivalt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Trajectory-of-Specification-Searching.pdf.Google Scholar

Wacholder, Sholom, Chanock, Stephen, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Ghormli, Laure El and Rothman, Nathaniel. 2004. “Assessing the Probability That a Positive Report Is False: An Approach for Molecular Epidemiology Studies.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 96 (6): 434–442.Google Scholar

Wade, Alex D., Wang, Kuansan, Sun, Yizhou and Gulli, Antonio. 2016. “WSDM Cup 2016: Entity Ranking Challenge.” Pp. 593–94 in Proceedings of the Ninth Acm International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. WSDM 2016. New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Wade, Sara Jackson and Reiter, Dan. 2007. “Does Democracy Matter? Regime Type and Suicide Terorrism.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (2): 329–348.Google Scholar

Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, Wetzels, Ruud, Borsboom, Denny, van der Maas, Han L. J. and Kievit, Rogier A.. 2012. “An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 632–638.Google Scholar

Wagner, Caroline and Alexander, Jeffrey. 2013. “Evaluating Transformative Research Programmes: A Case Study of the NSF Small Grants for Exploratory Research Programme.” Research Evaluation 22 (3): 187–197.Google Scholar

Wagner, Cassie, Gebremichael, Meseret D., Taylor, Mary K. and Soltys, Michael J.. 2009. “Disappearing Act: Decay of Uniform Resource Locators in Health Care Management Journals.” Journal of the Medical Library Association 97 (2): 122–130.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1996. Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Wallis Jillian, C., Rolando, Elizabeth and Borgman, Christine L.. 2013. “If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology.” PLoS ONE 8 (7): e67332.Google Scholar

Walsh, Elias, Dolfin, Sarah and DiNardo, John. 2009. “Lies, Damn Lies, and Pre-Election Polling.” American Economic Review 99 (2): 316–322.Google Scholar

Walters, Maggie. 2010. Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wang, Jian, Veugelers, Reinhilde and Stephan, Paula. 2017. “Bias against Novelty in Science: A Cautionary Tale for Users of Bibliometric Indicators.” Research Policy 46 (8): 1416–1436.Google Scholar

Ward, Kelly and Wolf-Wendel, Lisa. 2012. Academic Motherhood: How Faculty Manage Work and Family. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Warren, Elizabeth. 2016. “Strengthening Research through Data Sharing.” New England Journal of Medicine 375 (5): 401–403.Google Scholar

Watts, Duncan J. 2007. “A Twenty-First Century Science.” Nature 445 (7127): 489.Google Scholar

Watts, Duncan J. 2017. “Should Social Science be More Solution-Oriented?” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (0015): 1–5.Google Scholar

Weakliem, David L. 2016. “The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Comment.” Sociological Science 3: 109–115.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1946. “Science as a Vocation.” Pp. 129–56 in Gerth, Hans and Mills, C. Wright (eds), Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 2012. Collected Methodological Writings. Bruun, Hans Henrik and Whimster, Sam (eds), Bruun (trans.), Hans Henrik. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Webster, Gregory D., Jonason, Peter K. and Schember, Tatiana O.. 2009. “Hot Topics and Popular Papers in Evolutionary Psychology: Analyses of Title Words and Citation Counts in Evolution and Human Behavior, 1979–2008.” Evolutionary Psychology 7 (3): 348–362.Google Scholar

Weinberg, Julius. 1972, Edward Alsworth Ross and the Sociology of Progressivism. Madison, WI: State Historical Society of Wisconsin.Google Scholar

Weingart, Peter. 2005. “Impact of Bibliometrics upon the Science System: Inadvertent Consequences.” Scientometrics 62 (1): 117–131.Google Scholar

Weisshaar, Katherine. 2017. “Publish and Perish? An Assessment of Gender Gaps in Promotion to Tenure in Academia.” Social Forces 96 (2): 529–560.Google Scholar

Welch, Finis. 1974. “Minimum Wage Legislation in the United States.” Economic Inquiry 12 (3): 285–318.Google Scholar

Welch, Finis. 1977. “Minimum Wage Legislation in the United States: Reply.” Economic Inquiry 15 (1): 139–142.Google Scholar

Werner, Suzanne and Yuen, Amy. 2005. “Making and Keeping Peace.” International Organization 59(April): 261–292.Google Scholar

Wesley-Smith, Ian, Bergstrom, Carl T. and West, Jevin D.. 2016. “Static Ranking of Scholarly Papers Using Article-Level Eigenfactor (ALEF).” ArXiv:1606.08534 [Cs], June. http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08534.Google Scholar

West, Jevin D. and Vilhena, Daril A.. 2014. “A Network Approach to Scholarly Evaluation.” Pp. 151–165 in Cronin, Blaise and Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (eds), Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Western, Bruce. 1996. “Vague Theory and Model Uncertainty in Macrosociology.” Sociological Methodology 26: 165–192.Google Scholar

Westfall, Peter H. and Stanley Young, S.. 1993. Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for P-Value Adjustment. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Whicker, Marcia Lynn, Kronenfeld, Jennie Jacobs and Strickland, Ruth Ann. 1993. Getting Tenure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

White, Halbert. 2000. “A Reality Check for Data Snooping.” Econometrica 68 (5): 1097–1126.Google Scholar

Wicherts, Jelte M., Borsboom, Denny, Kats, Judith and Molenaar, Dylan. 2006. “The Poor Availability of Psychological Data for Reanalysis.” American Psychologist 61 (7): 726–728.Google Scholar

Wildgaard, Lorna, Schneider, Jesper W. and Larsen, Birger. 2014. “A Review of the Characteristics of 108 Author-Level Bibliometric Indicators.” Scientometrics 101 (1): 125–158.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Mark D., Dumontier, Michel, Aalbersberg, Ijsbrand Jan, Appleton, Gabrielle, Axton, Myles, Baak, Arie, Blomberg, Niklas et al. 2016. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship.” Scientific Data 3 (March). doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18.Google Scholar

Williams, Rebecca J., Tse, Tony, Harlan, William R. and Zarin, Deborah A.. 2010. “Registration of Observational Studies: Is it Time?” Canadian Medical Association Journal 182 (15): 1638–1642.Google Scholar

Williams, S. C. 2016. “Practices, Policies, and Persistence: A Study of Supplementary Materials in Crop Science Journals.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Information 17 (1): 11–22.Google Scholar

Wilsdon, James, Allen, Liz, Belfiore, Eleonora, Campbell, Philip, Curry, Stephen, Hill, Steven, Jones, Richard, Kain, Roger, Kerridge, Simon, Thelwall, Mike, Tinkler, Jane, Viney, Ian, Wouters, Paul, Hill, Jude and Johnson, Ben. 2015. The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Wilson, Edward O. 1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Wilson, Timothy. 2014. “Is There a Crisis of False Negatives in Psychology?” https://timwilsonredirect.wordpress.com/2014/06/15/is-there-a-crisis-of-false-negatives-in-psychology/.Google Scholar

Wimmer, Andreas and Kossler, Reinhart (eds). 2005. Understanding Change: Models, Methodologies and Metaphors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science, and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wolbrecht, Christina and Campbell, David E. 2007. “Leading by Example: Female Members of Parliament as Political Role Models.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 921–939.Google Scholar

Wolfinger, Nicholas H., Mason, Mary Ann and Goulden, Marc. 2008. “Problems in the Pipeline: Gender, Marriage, and Fertility in the Ivory Tower.” Journal of Higher Education 79 (4): 388–405.Google Scholar

Wolpin, Kenneth I. 2013. The Limits of Inference without Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wu, Xiaogang and Xie, Yu. 2003. “Does the Market Pay Off? Earnings Returns to Education in Urban China.” American Sociological Review 68 (3): 425–442.Google Scholar

Wydick, Bruce, Katz, Elizabeth and Janet, Brendan. 2014. “Do in-Kind Transfers Damage Local Markets? The Case of TOMS Shoe Donations in El Salvador.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6 (3): 249–267.Google Scholar

Xiao, Hong, Yuan, Fei and Wu, Jian-Guo. 2009. “Factors Affecting Citations: A Comparison between Chinese and English Journals in Ecology.” Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 20: 1253–1262.Google Scholar

Xie, Yihui. 2013. Dynamic Documents with R and Knitr. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Xie, Yihui. 2014. “Knitr: A Comprehensive Tool for Reproducible Research in R.” Pp. 3–32 in Stodden, Victoria, Leisch, Friedrich and Peng, Roger D. (eds), Implementing Reproducible Research. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Yardley, Sarah J., Watts, Kate M., Pearson, Jennifer and Richardson, Jane C.. 2014. “Ethical Issues in the Reuse of Qualitative Data Perspectives From Literature, Practice, and Participants.” Qualitative Health Research 24 (1): 102–113.Google Scholar

Yom, Sean. 2015. “From Methodology to Practice: Inductive Iteration in Comparative Research.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (5): 616–644.Google Scholar

Yong, , Ed. 2012. “Bad Copy.” Nature 485: 298–300.Google Scholar

Young, Cristobal. 2009. “Model Uncertainty in Sociological Research: An Application to Religion and Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review 74 (3): 380–397.Google Scholar

Young, Christobal and Holsteen, Katherine. 2015. “Model Uncertainty and Robustness: A Computational Framework for Multimodal Analysis,” Sociological Methods and Research 46 (1): 3–40.Google Scholar

Young, Christobal and Holsteen, Katherine. 2017. “Model Uncertainty and Robustness: A Computational Framework for Multimodel Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 46 (1): 3–40.Google Scholar

Young, Cristobal and Varner, Charles. 2011. “Millionaire Migration and State Taxation of Top Incomes: Evidence From a Natural Experiment.” National Tax Journal 64 (2): 255–283.Google Scholar

Zarya, Valentina. “The Percentage of Female CEOs in the Fortune 500 Drops to 4%.” Fortune.com, 7 June.Google Scholar

Ziliak, Stephen T. and McCloskey, Deirdre N.. 2004. “Size Matters: The Standard Error of Regressions in the American Economic Review.” Journal of Socio-Economics, Statistical Significance 33 (5): 527–546.Google Scholar

Ziliak, Stephen T. and McCloskey, Deirdre N.. 2008. The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Christian. 2015. “On the Need for a Replication Journal.” Working Paper Series, no. No. 2015–016 (August). http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/more/2015-016/.Google Scholar

Zittrain, Jonathan, Albert, Kendra and Lessig, Lawrence. 2014. “Perma: Scoping and Addressing the Problem of Link and Reference Rot in Legal Citations.” Harvard Law Review 127 (February): 176–199.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, Harriet. 1972. “Interviewing an Ultra-Elite.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 159–175.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, Harriet and Merton, Robert K.. 1971. “Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalisation, Structure and Functions of the Referee System.” Minerva 9: 66–100.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive