Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:44:40.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - The prevention of social disability in schizophrenia

from Part three - Limiting disability and preventing relapse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Tony Kendrick
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
Andre Tylee
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
Paul Freeling
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

The importance of social factors in schizophrenia

Clinical course and social disability

Schizophrenia remains a mental illness characterised by a wide variety of outcomes (Shepherd et al., 1989). After a first episode around one quarter of sufferers will recover and need no further input. Another two-thirds will have a variable course with recurrent relapses. A final 10% will remain severely disabled and in need of continuing and high contact care from services. Women have a consistently better outcome than men. Unusually for a long-term illness, over the very long term (i.e. two to three decades from the 1950s) there has been a substantial improvement in recovery rates.

It is important to distinguish between clinical and social outcomes. A minority of patients continue to have medication resistant positive symptoms such as voices or delusional ideas which may be distressing. Estimates of the frequency of these phenomena range from around 5–7% (Leff & Wing, 1971), through 23% (Curson et al., 1985) to 55% (Harrow, Carone & Westermeyer, 1985; Harrow, Ratenbury & Stoll, 1988). There is also evidence that depression is found in a considerable number (25–40%) of those with psychosis (Hemsley, 1992; Johnstone et al., 1991), and that the suicide rate is around 10% (Hirsch, Walsh & Draper, 1982).

Social outcome is often linked to clinical outcome – a poorer clinical outcome is likely to lead to social impairment, but not inevitably so. Shepherd et al. (1989), found two-fifths of their sample to have no more than mild impairment after five years, although men were more impaired than women.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×