Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T00:24:01.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Tim Wharton
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitchison, J. (1991) Language Change: Progress or Decay?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J. (1996) The Seeds of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Akhtar, N., Carpenter, M. and Tomasello, M. (1996) The role of discourse novelty in children's early word learning. Child Development 67; 635–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. and Bekoff, M. (1997) Species of Mind. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ameka, F. (1992) Interjections: the universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18; 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avramides, A. (1989) Meaning and Mind: An Examination of a Gricean Account of Language. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bach, K. (1994) Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9; 124–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. (1999) The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22; 327–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. (2001) You don't say?Synthese 127; 11–31.Google Scholar
Bach, K. and Harnish, R. (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Banfield, A. (1982) Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Spitz, A. and Cross, P. (1993) Do children with autism recognise surprise? A research note. Cognition and Emotion 7(6); 507–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, J. (1989) The Situation in Logic. Centre for the Study of Language and Information – distributed by University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, M-C. (1996) On the naturalness of things. In Brockman, J. and Matson, K. (eds.) How Things Are: A Science Tool-kit for the Mind. Phoenix: London.Google Scholar
Baum, S. and Pell, M. (1999) The neural basis of prosody: insights from lesion studies and neuroimaging. Aphasiology 13; 581–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benfey, T. (1869) Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft. Munich.Google Scholar
Besemeres, M. and Wierzbicka, A. (2003) The meaning of the particle lah in Singapore English. Pragmatics and Cognition 11; 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2000) Calls aren't words, syllables aren't syntax. Psycoloquy 11(14).Google Scholar
Blake, J., McConnell, S., Horton, G. and Benson, N. (1992) The gestural repertoire and its evolution over the second year. Early Development and Parenting 1; 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, D. (1987) Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. (1992) Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. (2002) Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blass, R. (1990) Relevance Relations in Discourse: A Study with Special Reference to Sissala. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. and German, T. (2000) Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition 77; B25–B31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolinger, D. (1983) The inherent iconism of intonation. In Haiman, J. (ed.) (1983) Iconicity in Syntax (Typological studies in language, Volume 6). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 97–109.Google Scholar
Bradbury, J. and Vehrencamp, S. (1998) Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. (2005) The theory of biological function and adaptation. Online conference on Adaptation and Representation at. Accessed on 5 August 2008 at www.interdisciplines.org/adaptation/papers/10
Breheny, R. (2006) Communication and Folk Psychology. Mind and Language 21(1); 74–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, I. (1991) Intentional communication and the development of an understanding of mind. In Frye, D. and Moore, C. (eds.) Children's Theories of Mind: Mental States and Social Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 49–75.Google Scholar
Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1979) Social structure, groups and interaction. In Giles, H. and Scherer, K., (eds.) Social Markers in Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 291–341.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. and Whiten, A. (eds.) (1988) Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Call, J., Bräuer, J., Kaminski, J. and Tomasello, M. (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology 117; 257–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999) Origins of Complex Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carston, R. (1996) Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8; 61–88.Google Scholar
Carston, R. (2000) Explicature and semantics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12; 1–44.Google Scholar
Carston, R. (2002a) Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. (2002b) Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and pragmatics. Mind and Language 17(1/2) 127–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, A. and Gussenhoven, C. (2003) Language-dependence in signalling of attitude in speech. In Suzuki, N. and C. Bartneck (eds.) Proceedings of Workshop on the Subtle Expressivity of Emotion, CHI 2003 Conference on Human and Computer Interaction.
Cheney, D. and Seyfarth, R. (1990) How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986) Knowledge of Language. London: Praeger.Google ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1988) Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1999) An Online Interview with Noam Chomsky: on pragmatics and related issues. Brain and Language, 68(3) 393–401.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000) New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B. (2007) ‘Blazing a trail’: moving from natural to linguistic meaning in accounting for the tones of English. In Nilsen, R. A., Appiah Amfo, N. A. and Borthen, K. (eds.) Interpreting Utterances; Pragmatics and its Interfaces. Essays in Honour of Thorstein Fretheim. Novus, Oslo; 69–81.Google Scholar
Clark, B. and Gerrig, R. (1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66; 764–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B. and Lindsey, G. (1990) Intonation, grammar and utterance interpretation. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 2; 32–51.Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. and Fox Tree, J. (2002) Using ‘uh’ and ‘um’ in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84; 73–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corballis, M. (2002) From Hand to Mouth: The Origins of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.) (1975) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. (1989) The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31; 197–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (2000) Consider the source: The evolution of adaptations for decoupling and metarepresentation. In Sperber, D. (ed.) Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science. New York: Oxford University Press; 53–115.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1995) The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. (1999) The expression of spatial relations and the spatialization of semantics in French Sign Language. In Fuchs, C. and Roberts, S. (eds.) Language Diversity and Cognitive Representations. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, R. (1996) Theory of Meaning. PhD Thesis. City University of new York. Available online at http://russelldale.com/dissertation/parts.html.
Darwin, C. (1872) The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray. Republished (1998). (Edited with foreword, commentary and afterword by P. Ekman.) London: Harper Collins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds.) (1975) The Logic of Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (1996) Philosophy of language. In Bunnin, N. and Tsui-James, E. P (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell; 90–139.Google Scholar
Davies, P. (1994) Troubles for direct proper functions. Noûs 28(3); 363–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. (1991) Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. (1997) The Symbolic Species. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Demko, T. (1995) Which came first: bees or flowers?Science Times; The New York Times. Tuesday 23 May 1995; B7–B8.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1978) Beliefs about beliefs. Behavior and Brain Sciences 4; 568–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. (1987) The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1988) The Intentional Stance in Theory and in Practice. In Byrne, R. and Whiten, A. (eds.) (1988) Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and The Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 180–202.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1995) Darwin's Dangerous Idea – Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1996) Granny versus Mother Nature – No Contest. Mind and Language 11; 263–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, R., Morris, J., and Gelder, B. (2001) Crossmodal binding of fear in voice and face. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 9; 10006–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, M. (1998) Mimesis and the executive suite. In Hurford, J., M, Studdert-Kennedy and Knight, C. (eds.) Approaches to the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 44–68.Google Scholar
Dreller, C. and Kirchner, W. (1993) How honeybees perceive the information of the dance language. Naturwissenshaften 80; 319–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreller, C. and Kirchner, W. (1994) Hearing in the Asian honeybees Apis dorsata and Apis florae. Insectes Socieaux 42; 115–25.Google Scholar
Duchenne, G. (1862) Mécanisme de la Physionomie Humaine, republished as (1990) The Mechanism of Human Facial Expression (edited and translated by Cuthbertson, R. A.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1981) The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. (1998) Theory of mind and the evolution of language. In Hurford, J., M, Studdert-Kennedy and Knight, C. (eds.) Approaches to the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 92–111.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1976) A Theory of Semiotics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1972) Similarities and differences between cultures in expressive movements. In Hinde, R. (ed.) Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 297–312.Google Scholar
Efron, D. (1941) Gesture and Environment. Morningside Heights, NY: King's Crown Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1989) The argument and evidence about universals in facial expressions of emotion. In Wagner, H. and Manstead, A. (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychophysiology. New York: Wiley; 143–64.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1992) An argument for basic emotion. Cognition and Emotion 6(3/4); 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. (1994) Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A Reply to Russell's Mistaken Critique. Psychological Bulletin 115(2); 268–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. (1999) Emotional and conversational nonverbal signals. In Messing, L. and Campbell, R. (eds.) Gesture, Speech and Sign. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. (1969) The repertoire of non-verbal behaviour categories: Origins, usage and coding. Semiotica 1; 49–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. and Rosenberg, E. L. (1997) What the Face Reveals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. (2003) Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland South East Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. and Levinson, S. (eds.) (2006a) Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition and Interaction. New York: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. and Levinson, S. (2006b) Introduction: human sociality as a new interdisciplinary field. In Enfield, N. and Levinson, S. (eds.) Roots of Human Sociality, 1–35. New York: Berg Publishers: 1–35.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V. (1998) Intonation and procedural encoding: The case of Spanish interrogatives. In Rouchota, V. and Jucker, A. (eds.) Current Issues in Relevance Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V. (2002) Echo-syntax and metarepresentations. Lingua 112; 871–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feibelman, J. (1960) An Introduction to Peirce's Philosophy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Dols, J. and Ruiz Belda, M.-A (1995) Are smiles a sign of happiness? Gold medal winners at the Olympic Games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69; 1113–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretheim, T. (2002) Intonation as a constraint on inferential processing. In Bel, B. and I. Marlien (eds.) Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference: 59–64.
Fodor, J. (1975) The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1981) Representations. Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1983) The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1998) Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J., Fodor, J. and Garrett, M. (1975) The psychological unreality of semantic representations. Linguistic Enquiry, Fall 1975; 515–31.
Fridlund, A. (1994) Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Frisch, K. (1967) The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. (1951) The Theory of Speech and Language. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (First published: Oxford, 1932.)Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. and Smiley, C. (1991) Hemispheric mechanisms controlling voluntary and spontaneous facial expressions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2; 239–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1999) Intentions in the Experience of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Todd, P. (1999) Fast and frugal heuristics: the adaptive toolbox. In Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. and the ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. and the ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goffman, E. (1964) The neglected situation. American Anthropologist 66(6), part 2; 133–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H. (1993) Understanding Aphasia. New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, C. (1981) Conversational Organisation: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gould, J. (1990) Honeybee cognition. Cognition 37; 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1989) Tires to Sandals. Natural History, April 1989, 8–15.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist program. In Selzer, J. (1993) Understanding Scientific Prose. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Grandy, R. and Warner, R. (1986) Paul Grice: a view of his work. In Grandy, R. and Warner, R. (eds.) Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1–44.Google Scholar
Green, M. (2007) Self-expression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1957) Meaning. Philosophical Review 66; 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1967) William James Lectures I-VII. Unpublished typescripts.
Grice, H. P. (1968) Utterer's meaning sentence meaning and word-meaning. Foundations of Language 4; 225–42.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1969) Utterer's meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review 78; 147–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press; 41–58.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1982) Meaning revisited. In Smith, N. (ed.) Mutual Knowledge. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989) Studies In The Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (2001) Aspects of Reason. (Edited by Warner, R.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M. (1998) Gesture as a Communication Strategy in Second Language Discourse: A Study of Learners of French and Swedish. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1964) Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. In Gumperz, J. and D. Hymes (eds.) The ethnography of communication. American Anthropologist 66(6), part 2; 137–54.CrossRef
Gumperz, J. (1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (2001) Interactional linguistics: a personal perspective. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (1972) (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York:Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2002) Intonation and interpretation: Phonetics and Phonology. Speech Prosody 2002: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Speech Prosody. Aix-en-Provence, ProSig and Université de Provence Laboratoire Parole et Langage. 47–57.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004) The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutt, E. (1992) Relevance Theory: A Guide to Successful Communication in Translation. Dallas, Summer Institute of Linguistics, and New York, United Bible Societies.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. (1963) Explorations in the Function of Language. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. (1967) Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H. (1989) The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Happé, F. (1993) Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition 48; 101–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happé, F. (1994) Autism: An Introduction to Psychological Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Happé, F. (1992) The autobiographical writings of three Asperger syndrome adults: Problems of interpretation and implications for theory. In Frith, U. (ed.) Autism and Asperger Syndrome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 207–42.Google Scholar
Happé, F. and Loth, E. (2002) Theory of mind and tracking speakers' intentions. in Mind and Language 17 (1/2); 24–36.CrossRef
Hare, B. and Tomasello, M. (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9; 439–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, H. L. A. (1952) Signs and words. Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 2. The University of St. Andrews for The Scots Philosophy Club.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. (1996) The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, T. (2002) The faculty of language: what is it? Who has it, and how did it evolve?Science 298; 1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschberg, J and Ward, G. (1995) The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics 24; 407–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, P., Ouston, J. and Lee, A. (1988) What's in a face? The case of autism. British Journal of Psychology. 79(4); 441–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockett, C. (1959) Animal ‘languages’ and human language. In Spuhler, J. N. (ed.) The Evolution of Man's Capacity for Culture. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 32–9.Google Scholar
Holliday Willey, L. (1999) Pretending to be Normal. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. (1951) Language and Intelligence. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hooff, J. (1972) A comparative approach to the phylogeny of laughter and smiling. In Hinde, R. (ed.) Non-verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 209–38.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Revised edition published 2003.)Google Scholar
House, J. (1990) Intonation structures and pragmatic interpretation. In Ramsaran, S. (ed.) Studies in the Pronunciation of English. London: Routledge; 38–57.Google Scholar
House, J. (2006) Constructing a context with intonation. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10); 1542–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, N. (1984) Consciousness Regained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N. (1988) The social function of intellect. In Byrne, R. and Whiten, A. (eds.) (1988) Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and The Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 271–86.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972) On communicative competence. In Pride, J. and Holmes, J. (eds.) Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ifantidou-Trouki, E. (1993) Sentential adverbs and relevance. Lingua 90 (1); 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou, E. (2001) Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K. (1998) Intonation and relevance. In Carston, R. and Uchida, S. (eds.) Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itani, R. (1995) Semantics and Pragmatics of Hedges in English and Japanese. University of London. PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
Iten, C. (2000) ‘Non-truth-Conditional’ Meaning, Relevance and Concessives. University of London PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1999) Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(7); 272–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobson, R. and Halle, M. (1956) Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1922) Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (1977) Demonstratives. In Almog, J., Perry, J. and Wettstein, H. (eds.) (1989) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 481–563.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (1997) What is meaning? Explorations in the theory of meaning as use. Unpublished manuscript.
Kazantzakis, N. (1965) Travels in Greece (Journey to the Morea). Translated by Reed, F. A.. Oxford: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1988) How gestures can become like words? In Poyotas, F. (ed.) Cross-cultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication. Toronto: Hogrefe; 131–41.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1992) The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction. In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004) Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, E. (1991) The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, R. and Johnston, R. (1979) Social and emotional messages of smiling: An ethological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42; 1529–53.Google Scholar
Ladd, R. (1978) The Structure of Intonational Meaning. London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, R. (1996) Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1997) Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. (2000) Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. (1987) Pretense and representation: The origins of ‘theory of mind’. Psychological Review 94; 412–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. (1992) Pretense, autism, and the ‘theory-of-mind’ module. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1; 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. (1994) ToMM, ToBY and Agency: core architecture and domain-specificity. In Hirschfeld, L. and Gelman, S. (eds.) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 119–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. and Happé, F. (1989) Autism and ostensive communication: The relevance of metarepresentation. Development and Psychopathology 1; 205–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. (1989) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969) Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. (2000) Intuition: A social-cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin 126; 109–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lightfoot, D. (1991) How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lizskowski, U., Carpenter, M., Striano, T. and Tomasello, M. (2006) 12- and 18-month-olds point to provide information for others. Journal of Cognition and Development 7; 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycan, W. (1991) Review of Avramides, A. (1989) Meaning and Mind: An Examination of a Gricean Account of Language. In Mind and Language 6; 83–6.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1972) Human Language. In Hinde, R. (ed.) Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 49–86.Google Scholar
McCann, J. and Peppé, S. (2003) Prosody in autism spectrum disorders: A critical review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 38; 325–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDowell, J. (1980) Meaning, communication and knowledge. In Straaten, Z. (ed.) Philosophical Subjects. Essays Presented to P. F. Strawson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992) Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (ed.) (2000) Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. (1978) Semantic relations among words. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. and Miller, G. (eds.) Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 60–118.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. (1984) Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. (2005) The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind and Body. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Moles, A. (1963) Animal language and information theory [Originally published as ‘Langage animal et théorie de l'information’]. In Busnel, R. (ed.) Acoustic Behaviour of Animals. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 112–31.Google Scholar
Morris, C. H. (1938) Foundation of the theory of signs. Reprinted in Morris, C. (1971) Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague: Mouton; 13–71.Google Scholar
Muller, M. (1862) Lectures on the Science of Language. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Muris, P., Meesters, C., Merckelbach, H. and Lomme, M. (1995) Knowledge of basic emotions in adolescent and adult individuals with autism. Psychological Reports 76(1), Feb 1995; 52–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neale, S. (1992) Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(5); 509–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I. and Sperber, D. (eds.) (2004) Experimental Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, C. and Richards, I. (1923) The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Okanoya, K. (2002) Sexual selection as a syntactical vehicle: The evolution of syntax in birdsong and human language through sexual selection. In Wray, A. (ed.) The Transition to Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 46–64.Google Scholar
Onishi, K. and Baillargeon, R. (2005) Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs?Science 308: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 255–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onishi, K., Baillargeon, R. and Leslie, A. (2007) 15-month-old infants detect violations in pretend sequences. Acta Psychologica 124; 106–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Origgi, G. and Sperber, D. (2000) Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. In Carruthers, P. and Chamberlain, A. (eds.) Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press; 140–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. and Rogers, S. (1990) Are there emotion perception deficits in young autistic children?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 31(3); 343–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peirce, C. (1897, 1903) Logic as semiotic: the theory of signs. In Buchler, J. (ed.) (1955) The Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Press.Google Scholar
Pell, M. (2002a) Surveying emotional prosody in the brain. In Bel, B. and I. Marlien (eds.) Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference; 77–82.
Pell, M. (2002b) Evaluation of nonverbal emotion in face and voice: Some preliminary findings on a new battery of tests. Brain and Cognition 48; 499–514.Google ScholarPubMed
Pilkington, A. (2000) Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. and Bloom, P. (1990) Natural Language and Natural Selection. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 13; 707–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provine, R. (2000) Laughter: A Scientific Investigation. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, J. and Svartik, J. (eds.) (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. (1987) Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. (1993) Direct Reference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. (1998) Pragmatics. In Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Vol. 7. London: Routledge; 620–633.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. (2002) Unarticulated Constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy 25; 299–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. (2002) Does linguistic communication rest on inference?Mind and Language 17(1/2); 105–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. (2004) Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rey, G. (1980) Functionalism and the emotions. In Rorty, A. (ed.) Explaining Emotions. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 163–98.Google Scholar
Rinn, W. (1984) The neuropsychology of facial expression: a review of the neurological and psychological mechanisms for producing facial expressions. Psychological Bulletin 95; 52–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, E., Edmonson, J., Seibert, G. and Homan, R. (1988) Acoustic analysis of affective prosody during right-sided Wada test: a within-subjects verification of the right hemisphere's role in language. Brain and Language 33; 128–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, J. (1994) Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin 115; 102–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabbagh, M. (1999) Communicative intentions and language: Evidence from right-hemisphere damage and autism. Brain and Language 68; 29–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, O. (1994) A neurologist's notebook: An Anthropologist on Mars. New Yorker, 27 December 1993–3 January 1994.
Sadock, J. and Zwicky, A. (1985) Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Shopen, T. (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 155–96.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1970) Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. London: Harvest.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. (1974) Course in General Linguistics. (First published 1916.) London: Peter Owen.Google Scholar
Scheuer, J. (1995) Relevance and prosody in spoken Danish. Journal of Pragmatics 23; 421–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, S. (1972) Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, B. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, B. (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scholl, B. and Leslie, A. (1999) Modularity, development and ‘theory of mind’. Mind and Language 14; 131–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1965) What is a speech act? In Black, M. (ed.) Philosophy in America. Allen and Unwin; 221–39.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1979) Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebeok, T. (1972) Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Seddoh, S. (2002) How discrete or independent are ‘affective’ prosody and ‘linguistic’ prosody?Aphasiology 16; 683–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, T. (1989) The honey-bee colony as a superorganism. American Scientist 77; 546–53.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. and Cheney, D. (1992) Meaning and mind in monkeys. Scientific American 267(6); 78–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seyfarth, R., Cheney, D. and Marler, P. (1980) Vervet monkey alarm calls: semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Animal Behaviour 28; 1070–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Simonin, O. (2006) Literary meaning and speaker's intention. Paper delivered at the 1st International Literature and Cognitive Science Conference (University of Connecticut, Storrs).
Smith, C. and Scott, H. (1997) A componential approach to the meaning of facial expressions. In Russell, J. and Fernandez-Dols, J. (eds.) The Psychology of Facial Expression. New York: Cambridge University Press;Google Scholar
Smith, N. and Tsimpli, I. (1995) The Mind of a Savant. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Southgate, V., Maanen, C. and , G.Csibra, (2007) Infant pointing: Communication to cooperate or communication to learn?Child Development 78; 735–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperber, D. (1990) The Evolution of the language faculty: A paradox and its solution. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 13; 756–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. (1994) The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In Hirschfeld, L. and Gelman, S. (eds.) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. (1995) How do we communicate? In Brockman, J. and Matson, K. (eds.) How Things Are: A Science Tool-kit for the Mind. Phoenix: London; 191–9.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1996) Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (2000) Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In Sperber, D. (ed.) Metarepresentations : A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 117–37.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (2001) An evolutionary perspective on testimony and argumentation. Philosophical Topics 29; 401–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. (2007) Seedless grapes: nature and culture. In Laurence, S. and Margolis, E. (eds.) Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 124–37.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Girotto, V. (2003) Does the selection task detect cheater detection? In Fitness, J. and Sterelny, K. (eds.) From Mating to Mentality: Evaluating Evolutionary Psychology. Monographs in Cognitive Science. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986/1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1997) Remarks on relevance theory and the Social Sciences. Multilingua 16; 145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1998) The mapping between the mental and public lexicon. In Carruther, P. and Bouchers, J. (eds.) Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2002) Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind and Language 17; 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1978) Assertion. In Cole, P (ed.) Pragmatics: Syntax and Semantics Volume 9. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (2002) Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25; 701–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. (2000) Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23; 391–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, M. (2000) Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry 31(4); 649–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C. (1944) Ethics and Language. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. (1964) Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review 73; 439–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P. (1996) The primacy of utterer's meaning. In Grandy, R. and Warner, R. (eds.) Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 109–29.Google Scholar
Surian, L., Caldi, L. and Sperber, D. (in press) Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. To appear in Psychological Science.
Tench, P. (1996) The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Barton, M. (1996) Learning words in non-ostensive contexts. Cognitive Development 10; 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. and Moll, H. (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28; 675–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trask, R. L. (1993) A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. and Hopper, P. (1993/2003) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vega-Moreno, R. (2007) Creativity and Convention: The Pragmatics of Everyday Figurative Speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandepitte, S. (1989) A pragmatic function of intonation. Lingua 79; 265–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1962) Thought and Language. (Translated by Hanfmann, E. and Vakar, G.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welby, Lady Victoria (1893) Meaning and metaphor. Monist 3(4); 510–25. Reprinted in Welby (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welby, Lady Victoria (1896) Sense meaning and interpretation. Mind 5(17); 24–37 and Mind 5(18) (1896). Reprinted in Welby (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welby, Lady Victoria (1911) Reprinted as Welby (1985) Walter Schmitz, H. (ed.) Significs and Language: The Articulate Form of Our Expressive and Interpretive Resources. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2000a) Interjections, evolution and the ‘showing’/‘saying’ continuum. Paper presented at The Third International Conference on the Evolution of Language (Evolang). Paris, 3–6 April 2000.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2000b) Interjections language and the ‘showing’/‘saying’ continuum. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12; 173–213.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2001) Natural pragmatics and natural codes. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 13; 109–58.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2002) Paul Grice saying and meaning. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14; 207–48.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2003a) Interjections language and the ‘showing’/‘saying’ continuum. Pragmatics and Cognition. 11(1); 39–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, T. (2003b) Natural pragmatics and natural codes. Mind and Language 18; 447–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, T. (2008) Meaning and showing: Gricean intentions and relevance theoretic intentions. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2); 131–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A. and Byrne, R. (1988) Taking (Machiavellian) Intelligence Apart: editorial. In Byrne, R. and Whiten, A. (eds.) (1988) Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and The Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 50–66.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. and Byrne, R. (1997) Machiavellian Intelligence II: Extensions and Evaluations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, A. (2000) The attitudinal effects of prosody, and how they relate to emotion. In Proceedings of Speech Emotion-2000; 143–48.
Wichmann, A. (2002) Attitudinal intonation and the inferential process. In Bel, B. and I. Marlien (eds) Proceedings of the Speech Prosody Conference; 11–16.
Wierzbicka, A. (1992) The semantics of interjection. Journal of Pragmatics 18; 159–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1994) Cognitive domains and the structure of the lexicon: The case of emotions. In Hirschfeld, L. and Gelman, S. (eds.) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1996) Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (2000) The semantics of human facial expression. Pragmatics and Cognition 8(1); 147–83.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. (1992) Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 18; 119–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, L.Holliday (1999) Pretending to be Normal. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Williams, D. (1992) Nobody Nowhere: The Remarkable Autobiography of an Autistic Girl. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Williams, D. (1994) Somebody Somewhere. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Williams, D. (1999) Like Colour to the Blind. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (1998) Linguistic Structure and Inferential Communication. In Caron, B. (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2000) Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In Sperber, D. (ed.) Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 411–48.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2003) Relevance theory and lexical pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 15; 273–91.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2005) New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. Lingua 115; 1129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Carston, R. (2007) A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Burton-Roberts, N. (ed.) Pragmatics. London: Palgrave; 230–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1981) On Grice's theory of conversation. In Werth, P. (ed.) Conversation and discourse. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1988) Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In Dancy, J., Moravcsik, J. and Taylor, C. (eds.) Human Agency: Language, Duty and Value. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press; 77–101.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1993) Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1); 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2002) Truthfulness and Relevance. Mind 111 (443); 583–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2004) Relevance theory. In Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell; 607–32.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Wharton, T. (2006) Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Tim Wharton, University College London
  • Book: Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication
  • Online publication: 18 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635649.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Tim Wharton, University College London
  • Book: Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication
  • Online publication: 18 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635649.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Tim Wharton, University College London
  • Book: Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication
  • Online publication: 18 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635649.009
Available formats
×