Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T01:22:47.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Cytology of Pleural and Peritoneal Lesions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2018

By
Shikha Bose
Edited by
Alberto M. Marchevsky ,
Aliya N. Husain  and
Françoise Galateau-Sallé
Alberto M. Marchevsky
Affiliation:
Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
Aliya N. Husain
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Françoise Galateau-Sallé
Affiliation:
MESOPATH National Reference Center & Cancer Center Leon Berard
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Practical Pathology of Serous Membranes , pp. 53 - 66
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Manosca, F, Schinstine, M, Fetsch, PA, Sorbara, L, Wilder, AM, Brosky, K, et al. Diagnostic effects of prolonged storage on fresh effusion samples. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:6–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moriarty, AT, Schwartz, MR, Ducatman, BS, Booth, CN, Haja, J, Chakraborty, S, et al. A liquid concept – do classic preparations of body cavity fluid perform differently than ThinPrep cases? Observations from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:1716–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoda, RS. Non-gynecologic cytology on liquid-based preparations: a morphologic review of facts and artifacts. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:621–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moriarty, AT, Stastny, J, Volk, EE, Hughes, JH, Miller, TR, Wilbur, DC. Fluids – good and bad actors: observations from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:513–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, H, McMeekin, EM, Sturgis, CD. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor, a “floating island” pattern in pleural fluid cytology: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Pathol. 2015;2015:676894.Google ScholarPubMed
Hassan, I, Shyyan, R, Donohue, JH, Edmonson, JH, Gunderson, LL, Moir, CR, et al. Intraabdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumors: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Cancer. 2005;104:1264–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abadi, MA, Zakowski, MF. Cytologic features of sarcomas in fluids. Cancer. 1998;84:71–76.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husain, AN, Colby, TV, Ordonez, NG, Allen, TC, Attanoos, RL, Beasley, MB, et al. Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: 2017 update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017, Epub ahead of print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjerpe, A, Ascoli, V, Bedrossian, CW, Boon, ME, Creaney, J, Davidson, B, et al. Guidelines for the cytopathologic diagnosis of epithelioid and mixed-type malignant mesothelioma. Complementary statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group, also endorsed by the International Academy of Cytology and the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology. Acta Cytol. 2015;59:2–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hjerpe, A, Ascoli, V, Bedrossian, CW, Boon, ME, Creaney, J, Davidson, B, et al. Guidelines for the Cytopathologic Diagnosis of Epithelioid and Mixed-Type Malignant Mesothelioma: a secondary publication. Cytopathology. 2015;26:142–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hjerpe, A, Ascoli, V, Bedrossian, CW, Boon, ME, Creaney, J, Davidson, B, et al. Guidelines for the cytopathologic diagnosis of epithelioid and mixed-type malignant mesothelioma: Complementary Statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group, Also Endorsed by the International Academy of Cytology and the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43:563–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, DW, Reid, G, Kao, SC, Kao, SC, van Zandwijk, N, Klebe, S. Challenges and controversies in the diagnosis of mesothelioma: Part 1. Cytology-only diagnosis, biopsies, immunohistochemistry, discrimination between mesothelioma and reactive mesothelial hyperplasia, and biomarkers. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66:847–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paintal, A, Raparia, K, Zakowski, MF, Nayar, R. The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in effusion cytology: a reappraisal and results of a multi-institution survey. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:703–07.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rakha, EA, Patil, S, Abdulla, K, Abdulkader, M, Chaudry, Z, Soomro, IN. The sensitivity of cytologic evaluation of pleural fluid in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38:874–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renshaw, AA, Dean, BR, Antman, KH, Antman, KH, Sugarbaker, DJ. The role of cytologic evaluation of pleural fluid in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Chest. 1997;111:106–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedrossian, CW. An update on pleuro-pulmonary cytopathology: Part I: Cytological diagnosis of mesothelioma and molecular cytology of lung cancer with an historical perspective. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43:513–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinelli, V, Laroumagne, S, Sakr, L, Marchetti, GP, Tassi, GF, Astoul, P. Pleural fluid cytological yield and visceral pleural invasion in patients with epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:595–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taliano, RJ, Lu, S, Singh, K, Mangray, S, Tavares, R, Noble, L, et al. Calretinin expression in high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast is associated with basal-like subtype and unfavorable prognosis. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:2743–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duhig, EE, Kalpakos, L, Yang, IA, Clarke, BE. Mesothelial markers in high-grade breast carcinoma. Histopathology. 2011;59:957–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hecht, JL, Lee, BH, Pinkus, JL, Pinkus, GS. The value of Wilms tumor susceptibility gene 1 in cytologic preparations as a marker for malignant mesothelioma. Cancer. 2002;96:105–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jo, VY, Cibas, ES, Pinkus, GS. Claudin-4 immunohistochemistry is highly effective in distinguishing adenocarcinoma from malignant mesothelioma in effusion cytology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:299–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Afshar-Moghaddam, N, Heidarpour, M, Dashti, S. Diagnostic value of claudin-4 marker in pleural and peritoneal effusion cytology: does it differentiate between metastatic adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells? Adv Biomed Res. 2014;3:161.Google ScholarPubMed
Westfall, DE, Fan, X, Marchevsky, AM. Evidence-based guidelines to optimize the selection of antibody panels in cytopathology: pleural effusions with malignant epithelioid cells. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38:9–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cakir, E, Demirag, F, Aydin, M, Unsal, E. Cytopathologic differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells: a logistic regression analysis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2009;37:4–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Churg, A, Colby, TV, Cagle, P, Corson, J, Gibbs, AR, Gilks, B, et al. The separation of benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1183–200.Google ScholarPubMed
Hasteh, F, Lin, GY, Weidner, N, Michael, CW. The use of immunohistochemistry to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in cytologic effusions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118:90–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuperman, M, Florence, RR, Pantanowitz, L, Visintainer, PF, Cibas, ES, Otis, CN. Distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial cells in effusions by Glut-1, EMA, and Desmin expression: an evidence-based approach. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41:131–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, HC, Sheffield, BS, Rodriguez, S, Thompson, K, Tse, CH, Gown, AM, et al. Utility of BAP1 immunohistochemistry and p16 (CDKN2A) FISH in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in effusion cytology specimens. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:120–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Sheffield, BS, Hwang, HC, Lee, AF, Thompson, K, Rodriguez, S, Tse, CH, et al. BAP1 immunohistochemistry and p16 FISH to separate benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:977–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churg, A, Sheffield, BS, Galateau-Sallé, F. New markers for separating benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations: are we there yet? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140:318–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, T, Hamasaki, M, Matsumoto, S, Hiroshima, K, Tsujimura, T, Kawai, T, et al. p16/CDKN2A FISH in differentiation of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma from mesothelial hyperplasia and epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;143:830–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hida, T, Matsumoto, S, Hamasaki, M, Kawahara, K, Tsujimura, T, Hiroshima, K, et al. Deletion status of p16 in effusion smear preparation correlates with that of underlying malignant pleural mesothelioma tissue. Cancer Sci. 2015;106:1635–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Das, DK, Al-Juwaiser, A, George, SS, Francis, IM, Sathar, SS, Sheikh, ZA, et al. Cytomorphological and immunocytochemical study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in pleural effusion and ascitic fluid. Cytopathology. 2007;18:157–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bangerter, M, Hildebrand, A, Griesshammer, M. Combined cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic analysis in the diagnostic workup of lymphomatous effusions. Acta Cytol. 2001;45:307–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinzone, MR, Berretta, M, Cacopardo, B, Nunnari, G. Epstein–Barr virus- and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-related malignancies in the setting of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Semin Oncol. 2015;42:258–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, D, Ballestas, ME, Kaye, KM, Gulizia, JM, Winters, GL, Fletcher, J, et al. Primary-effusion lymphoma and Kaposi's sarcoma in a cardiactransplant recipient. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:444–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesarman, E, Nador, RG, Aozasa, K, Delsol, G, Said, JW, Knowles, DM. Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus in non-AIDS related lymphomas occurring in body cavities. Am J Pathol. 1996;149:53–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Nador, RG, Cesarman, E, Chadburn, A, Dawson, DB, Ansari, MQ, Said, J, et al. Primary effusion lymphoma: a distinct clinicopathologic entity associated with the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpes virus. Blood. 1996;88:645–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matolcsy, A, Nádor, RG, Cesarman, E, Knowles, DM. Immunoglobulin VH gene mutational analysis suggests that primary effusion lymphomas derive from different stages of B cell maturation. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:1609–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, W, Youm, W, Rezk, SA, Zhao, X. Human herpesvirus 8-unrelated primary effusion lymphoma-like lymphoma: report of a rare case and review of 54 cases in the literature. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140:258–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, J, Selvaggi, SM, Leith, CP, Fitzgerald, SA, Stewart, J 3rd. Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus/human herpesvirus-8-negative effusion-based lymphoma: report of 3 cases and review of the literature. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:661–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klepfish, A, Zuckermann, B, Schattner, A. Primary effusion lymphoma in the absence of HIV infection–clinical presentation and management. Q J Med. 2015;108:481–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×