Bibliography

Nancy Cartwright

doi:10.1017/9781009201896.007

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 June 2022

Nancy Cartwright

Show author details

Nancy Cartwright: Affiliation:
Durham University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: A Philosopher Looks at Science , pp. 195 - 201

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009201896.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamantidis, Antoine R., Zhang, Feng, Aravanis, Alexander M., Deisseroth, Karl and de-Lecea, Luis 2007. ‘Neural substrates of awakening probed with optogenetic control of hypocretin neurons’, Nature 450: 420–424.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Andreas, Holger 2017. ‘Theoretical Terms in Science’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/theoretical-terms-science/.Google Scholar

Aponte, Yexica, Atasoy, Deniz and Sternson, Scott M. 2011. ‘AGRP neurons are sufficient to orchestrate feeding behavior rapidly and without training’, Nature Neuroscience 14: 351–355.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arabatzis, Theodore 2001. ‘The Zeeman effect and the discovery of the electron’, in Buchwald, Jed Z. and Warwick, Andrew (eds), Histories of the Electron. MIT Press, 171–194.Google Scholar

Barrotta, Pierluigi and Montuschi, Eleonora 2018. ‘The dam project: who are the experts?’, in Barrotta, Pierluigi and Scarafile, Giovanni (eds), Science and Democracy: Controversies and Conflicts. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 17–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berengarten, Richard 2019. ‘On universalism and particularism or looking at flowers again: twelve propositions’, Margutte, http://www.margutte.com/?p=30603&lang=en.Google Scholar

Bernal, J. D. 1939. The Social Function of Science. George Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar

Bickle, John 2006. ‘Reducing mind to molecular pathways: explicating the reductionism implicit in current cellular and molecular neuroscience’, Synthese 151: 411–434.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bollhagen, Andrew 2021. ‘The inchworm episode: reconstituting the phenomenon of kinesin motility’, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11: 1–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bridgman, Percy Williams 1927. The Logic of Modern Physics. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Buchwald, Jed Z. and Warwick, Andrew 2001. ‘Introduction’, in Buchwald, Jed Z. and Warwick, Andrew (eds), Histories of the Electron. MIT Press, 1–18.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy 2019. Nature, the Artful Modeler: Lectures on Laws, Science, How Nature Arranges the World and How We Can Arrange It Better. Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy, Hardie, Jeremy, Montuschi, Eleonora, Soleiman, Matthew and Thresher, Ann Forthcoming. The Tangle of Science: Reliability beyond the Scientific Method, Rigour, and Objectivity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chang, Hasok 2012. Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Springer.Google Scholar

Chang, Hasok 2015. ‘Reductionism and the relation between chemistry and physics’, in Arabatzis, Theodore, Renn, Jürgen and Simões, Ana (eds), Relocating the History of Science: Essays in Honor of Kostas Gavroglu. Springer, 193–209.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine and Park, Katharine 1998. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. Zone Books.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald 1970. ‘Mental events’, in Davidson, Donald (1980) Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press, 201–224.Google Scholar

Deaton, Angus 2020. ‘Randomization in the tropics revisited: a theme and eleven variations’ (No. w27600). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Dirac, Paul Adrien Maurice 1929. ‘Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 123: 714–733.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World: The Gifford Lectures, 1927. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Christopher J. 2009. ‘An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers’, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 40: 532–538.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fleck, Ludwik 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fox-Keller, Evelyn 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. A. W. H. Freeman/Owl Books.Google Scholar

Fox Keller, Evelyn 2014. ‘Pot-holes everywhere: how (not) to read my biography of Barbara McClintock’, in Govoni, Paola and Franceschi, Zelda Alice (eds), Writing about Lives in Science. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht unipress, 33–42.Google Scholar

Franklin, Allan 1989. The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Galvani, Luigi, 1791. D Viribus Electricitatis in Motu Musculari Commentarius. Press of the Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Gardner, W. H. 1969. ‘Gerard Manley Hopkins and the poetry of inscape’, Theoria 33: 1–16.Google Scholar

Gilboa, Itzhak 2009. Theory of Decision under Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Glanvill, Joseph 2011. Scepsis Scientifica, or the Vanity of Dogmatizing. Ex-Classics Project.Google Scholar

Guskey, Thomas R. 2019. ‘Interpreting average effect sizes: never a center without a spread’, NASSP Bulletin 103: 273–280.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian 1991. ‘Speculation, calculation and the creation of phenomena’, in Munévar, Gonzola (ed.), Beyond Reason: Essays on the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. Springer, 131–157.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian 2016. Logic of Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S. 1929. ‘Heredity’, in Encyclopedia Britannica, 14th ed. Encyclopedia Britannica Company, 433–455.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G. 1965. ‘The theoretician’s dilemma: a study in the logic of theory construction’, in Hempel, Carl G, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press, 173–226.Google Scholar

Hendry, David F. 1995. Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hendry, Robin Findlay 2010. ‘Emergence vs. reduction in chemistry’, in Macdonald, Cynthia and Macdonald, Graham (eds), Emergence in Mind. Oxford University Press, 205–221.Google Scholar

Henry, John 2008. The Scientific Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science. Macmillan International Higher Education.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, Christopher and Sober, Elliot 2004. ‘Prediction versus accommodation and the risk of overfitting’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 1–34.Google Scholar

Hua, Wei, Chung, Johnson and Gelles, Jeff 2002. ‘Distinguishing inchworm and hand-over-hand processive kinesin movement by neck rotation measurements’, Science 295(5556): 844–848.Google Scholar

Hume, David 1779 [2020]. Hume’s Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. Lindhardt og Ringhof.Google Scholar

Insel, Thomas, Cuthbert, Bruce, Garvey, Marjorie, Heinssen, Robert, Pine, Daniel S., Quinn, Kevin, Sanislow, Charles and Wang, Philip 2010. ‘Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders’, The American Journal of Psychiatry 167: 748–751.Google Scholar

Kaiser, D., 2005. Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kandel, E. R., 2007. In Search of Memory: The Emergence of a New Science of Mind. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Kay, John and King, Mervyn 2020. Radical Uncertainty: Decision‐Making beyond the Numbers. Bridge Street Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1987. Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894–1912. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ladyman, James, Ross, Don, Spurrett, David and Collier, John 2007. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Maxwell, J. C. 1860. ‘II. Illustrations of the dynamical theory of gases’, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 20: 21–37.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Brian and Bennett, Karen 2018. ‘Supervenience’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/.Google Scholar

Menger, Carl 1985. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences. New York University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, David I., Nolla, Kyle M., Eagly, Alice H. and Uttal, David H. 2018. ‘The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: a meta-analysis of 5 decades of U.S. draw-a-scientist studies’, Child Development 89: 1943–1955.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Millikan, R. A. 1913. ‘On the elementary electrical charge and the Avogadro constant’, Physical Review 2: 109–143.Google Scholar

Millikan, R. A. 1950. Autobiography. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Milward, P. 1989. ‘Hopkins on man and being’, in Fennell, Francis L. (ed.) The Fine Delight: Centenary Essays on Gerard Manley Hopkins. Loyola University Press, 127–144.Google Scholar

Morgan, Mary S. and Morrison, Margaret (eds) 1999. Models as Mediators. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Munro, E., Cartwright, N., Hardie, J. and Montuschi, E. 2016. Improving Child Safety: Deliberation, Judgement and Empirical Research. Centre for Humanities Engaging Science and Society.Google Scholar

Nagel, Ernest 1961. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences & Institute of Medicine 2008. Science, Evolution, and Creationism. National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Navarro, Jaume 2012. A History of the Electron: JJ and GP Thomson. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Eileen, ed. 2001. Observations upon Experimental Philosophy by Margaret Cavendish. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Paul and Putnam, Hilary 1958. ‘Unity of science as a working hypothesis’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2: 3–36.Google Scholar

Porter, Theodore M. 2020. Trust in Numbers. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rose, Nikolas and Abi-Rached, Joelle M. 2013. Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Schäfer, Thomas and Schwarz, Marcus A. 2019. ‘The meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases’, Frontiers in Psychology 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. Party Government: American Government in Action. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Sheredos, B., Burston, D. C., Abrahamsen, A. and Bechtel, W. 2013. ‘Why do biologists use so many diagrams?’, Philosophy of Science, 80: 931–944.Google Scholar

Steinle, Friedrich 1997. ‘Entering new fields: exploratory uses of experimentation’, Philosophy of Science 64: S65–S74.Google Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel 2021. ‘Physicalism’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/.Google Scholar

Tahko, Tuomas E. 2021. Unity of Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vidal, Fernando 2009. ‘Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity’, History of the Human Sciences 22: 5–36.Google Scholar

Whelan, F. G. 1983. ‘Prologue: democratic theory and the boundary problem’, in Penncok, James R. and Chapman, John W. (eds), Nomos 25. New York University Press, 13–47.Google Scholar

Wise, M. Norton 2017. ‘On the narrative form of simulations’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 62: 74–85.Google Scholar

Wise, M. Norton 2020. ‘Roundtable with 2019 Sarton Medalist, Norton Wise’, Newsletter of the History of Science Society 49, https://cdn.ymaws.com/hssonline.org/resource/resmgr/newsletter_archive/hss-nl-2020-vol49-n3-july.pdf.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive