Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:10:13.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2021

Kelly Iverson
Kelly Iverson
Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Performing Early Christian Literature
Audience Experience and Interpretation of the Gospels
 , pp. 191 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, James B., Nelson, Anthony J., and Purring, Kevin. “Eye Behavior.” Pages 229–61 in Nonverbal Communication. Edited by Hall, Judith A. and Knapp, Mark L.. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Aeschylus, Oresteia: Libation-Bearers. Edited and translated by Sommerstein, Alan H.. LCL. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Ahearne-Kroll, Stephen P. The Psalms of Lament in Mark’s Passion: Jesus’ Davidic Suffering. SNTSMS 142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Aichele, George. “Canon as Intertext: Restraint or Liberation?” Pages 139–56 in Reading the Bible Intertextually. Edited by Hays, Richard B., Alkier, Stefan, and Huizenga, Leroy A.. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Aichele, George, et al. The Postmodern Bible: The Bible and Culture Collective. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Aldrete, Gregory S. Gestures and Acclamations in Ancient Rome. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jessica D., and Nygaard, Lynne C.. “Reading Voices and Hearing Text: Talker-Specific Auditory Imagery in Reading.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34 (2008): 446–59.Google Scholar
Alfifi, Walid A. “Nonverbal Communication.” Pages 39–62 in Explaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars. Edited by Whaley, Bryan B. and Samter, Wendy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2007.Google Scholar
Allain, Paul, and Harvie, Jen. The Routledge Companion to Theatre and Performance. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Allen, Graham. Roland Barthes. Routledge Critical Thinkers. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. Jr. The Historical Christ and the Theological Jesus. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Allison, , Constructing Jesus: Memory, Imagination, and History. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2010.Google Scholar
Alloway, Ross G., and Alloway, Tracy Packiam. “Working Memory: An Introduction.” Pages 26–43 in Working Memory: The Connected Intelligence. Edited by Packiam Alloway, Tracy and Alloway, Ross G.. Frontiers of Cognitive Psychology. New York: Psychology, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York: Basic, 1981.Google Scholar
Ambrose, Cohen. “Transferring Belief: The Stage Presence of the Spiritual Meme.” Pages 26–35 in Theatre Symposium: Ritual, Religion, and Theatre. Theatre Symposium 21. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Andersen, Peter A. Nonverbal Communication: Forms and Functions. 2nd ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland, 2008.Google Scholar
Anderson, Janice Capel. Matthew’s Narrative Web: Over, and Over, and Over Again. JSNTSup 91. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Poetics. Edited and translated by Halliwell, Stephen. LCL. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Arnott, Peter D. Public and Performance in the Greek Theatre. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Richard C., and Shiffrin, Richard M.. “Human Memory: A Proposed System and Its Control Processes.” Pages 89–195 in vol. 2 of The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Edited by Spence, Kenneth W. and Spence, Janet Taylor. New York: Academic, 1968.Google Scholar
Aune, David. The New Testament in Its Literary Environment. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1987.Google Scholar
Auslander, Philip. “General Introduction.” Pages 1–24 in vol. 1 of Performance: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies. Edited by Auslander, Philip. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Baddeley, Alan D. “The Episodic Buffer: A New Component of Working Memory?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000): 417–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, , Working Memory, Thought, and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Baddeley, , “Working Memory.” Current Biology 20 (2010): 136–40.Google Scholar
Baddeley, , “Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies.” Annual Review of Psychology 63 (2012): 1–29.Google Scholar
Baddeley, Alan, Eysenck, Michael W., and Anderson, Michael C.. Memory. 2nd ed. London: Psychology, 2015.Google Scholar
Baddeley, Alan D., and Hitch, Graham J.. “Working Memory.” Pages 47–89 in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. Edited by Bower, Gordon H.. New York: Academic, 1974.Google Scholar
Baddeley, Alan D., Thomson, Neil, and Buchanan, Mary. “Word Length and the Structure of Short-Term Memory.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14 (1975): 575–89.Google Scholar
Bailey, Kenneth E. “Informal Controlled Oral Tradition and the Synoptic Gospels.” AsJT 5 (1991): 34–54.Google Scholar
Bailey, , “Middle Eastern Oral Tradition and the Synoptic Gospels.” ExpTim 106 (1995): 363–67.Google Scholar
Baker, Coleman A. Identity, Memory, and Narrative in Early Christianity: Peter, Paul, and Recategorization in the Book of Acts. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2011.Google Scholar
Bakker, Egbert J. “Discourse and Performance: Involvement, Visualization and ‘Presence’ in Homeric Poetry.” Classical Antiquity 12 (1993): 1–29.Google Scholar
Balcetis, Emily, and Dunning, David. “See What You Want to See: Motivational Influences on Visual Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006): 612–25.Google Scholar
Balme, Christopher B. The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bar-Ilan, Meir. “Illiteracy in the Land of Israel in the First Centuries CE,” Pages 46–61 in vol. 2 of Essays in the Social Scientific Study of Judaism and Jewish Society. Edited by Fishbane, Simcha, Schoenfeld, Stuart, and Goldschlaeger, Alain. Hoboken, NJ: Ktav, 1992.Google Scholar
Barranger, Milly S. Theatre: A Way of Seeing. 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2006.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Aspen Magazine 5–6 (1967). www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/threeEssays.html.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “La mort de l’auteur.” Manteia 5 (1968): 12–17.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Pages 142–48 in Image – Music – Text. Translated by Heath, Stephen. London: Fontana, 1977a.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “From Work to Text.” Pages 155–64 in Image – Music – Text. Translated by Heath, Stephen. London: Fontana, 1977b.Google Scholar
Barton, David, Hamilton, Mary, and Ivanič, Roz, eds. Situated Literacies: Theorising Reading and Writing in Context. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Barton, Stephen C., Stuckenbruck, Loren T., and Wold, Benjamin G., eds. Memory in the Bible and Antiquity: The Fifth Durham-Tübingen Research Symposium (Durham, September 2004). WUNT 212. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2017.Google Scholar
Bauer, Patricia J. Remembering the Times of Our Lives: Memory in Infancy and Beyond. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2007.Google Scholar
Beckerman, Bernard. Dynamics of Drama: Theory and Method of Analysis. New York: Drama Book Specialists, 1979.Google Scholar
Bell, Elizabeth. Theories of Performance. London: Sage, 2008.Google Scholar
Bennett, Susan. Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Bérard, Jocelyn. Accelerating Leadership Development: Practical Solutions for Building Your Organization’s Potential. Ontario: Jossey-Bass, 2013.Google Scholar
Best, Ernest. Mark: The Gospel as Story. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1983.Google Scholar
Bishop, T. G. Shakespeare and the Theatre of Wonder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Black, C. Clifton. “The Face Is Familiar – I Just Can’t Place It.” Pages 33–49 in The Ending of Mark and the Ends of God: Essays in Memory of Donald Harrisville Juel. Edited by Roberts Gaventa, Beverly and Miller, Patrick D.. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2005.Google Scholar
Black, Fiona C., and Koosed, Jennifer L.. Reading with Feeling: Affect Theory and the Bible. SemeiaSt 95. Atlanta: SBL, 2019.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus. Simon Peter in Scripture and Memory: The New Testament Apostle in the Early Church. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2012.Google Scholar
Boer, Roland. “An Essay on Method.” Pages 15–32 in Present and Future of Biblical Studies: Celebrating Twenty-Five Years of Brill’s Biblical Interpretation. Edited by Benny, Tat-siong Liew. BibInt 161. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar
Bond, Helen K. Pontius Pilate in History and Interpretation. SNTSMS 100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Boomershine, Thomas E. “Peter’s Denial as Polemic or Confession: The Implications of Media Theory for Biblical Hermeneutics.” Semeia 39 (1987): 47–68.Google Scholar
Boomershine, Thomas E. Story Journey: An Invitation to the Gospel as Storytelling. Nashville: Abingdon, 1988.Google Scholar
Boomershine, Thomas E. “All Scholarship Is Personal: David Rhoads and Performance Criticism.” CurTM 37 (2010): 279–87.Google Scholar
Boomershine, Thomas E. “The Medium and Message of John: Audience Address and Audience Identity in the Fourth Gospel.” Pages 92–120 in The Fourth Gospel in First-Century Media Culture. Edited by Le Donne, Anthony and Thatcher, Tom. LNTS 426. London: T&T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar
Boomershine, Thomas E. The Messiah of Peace: A Performance-Criticism Commentary on Mark’s Passion-Resurrection Narrative. Biblical Performance Criticism 12. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2015.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Botha, Pieter J. J. “Mark’s Story as Oral Traditional Literature: Rethinking the Transmission of Some Traditions about Jesus.” HvTSt 47 (1991): 304–31.Google Scholar
Botha, Pieter J. J. Orality and Literacy in Early Christianity. Biblical Performance Criticism 5. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2012.Google Scholar
Botha, Pieter J. J. “The Gospel of Mark, Orality Studies, and Performance Criticism.” R&T 25 (2018): 350–93.Google Scholar
Brant, Jo-Ann A. Dialogue and Drama: Elements of Greek Tragedy in the Fourth Gospel. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2004.Google Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt. Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. Translated by Willett, John. New York: Hill and Wang, 1964.Google Scholar
Brickle, Jeffrey E. Aural Design and Coherence in the Prologue of First John. LNTS 465. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.Google Scholar
Brosch, Tobias, Pourtois, Gilles, and Sander, David. “The Perception and Categorisation of Emotional Stimuli: A Review.” Pages 66–98 in Cognition and Emotion: Reviews of Current Research and Theories. Edited by De Houwer, Jan and Hermans, Dirk. Hove: Psychology, 2010.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. The Gospel According to John XIII–XXI. AB 29A. Garden City: Doubleday, 1970.Google Scholar
Brozgal, Lia Nicole. Against Autobiography: Albert Memmi and the Production of Theory. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Brück, Carolin, Kreifelts, Benjamin, Ethofer, Thomas, and Wildgruber, Dirk. “Emotional Voices: The Tone of (True) Feelings.” Pages 265–85 in The Cambridge Handbook of Human Affective Neuroscience. Edited by Armony, Jorge and Vuilleumier, Patrik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bruno, Nicola, and Pavani, Francesco. Perception: A Multisensory Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Budelmann, Felix, Maguire, Laurie, and Teasdale, Ben. “Ambiguity and Audience Response.” Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 23 (2016): 89–114.Google Scholar
Bundy, Penny, Ewing, Robyn, and Fleming, Josephine. “Drama and the Audience: Transformative Encounters in TheatreSpace.” Pages 145–58 in How Drama Activates Learning: Contemporary Research and Practice. Edited by Anderson, Michael and Dunn, Julie. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Judee K., and Bacue, Aaron E.. “Nonverbal Communication Skills.” Pages 179–200 in Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills. Edited by Greene, John O. and Burleson, Brant R.. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2003.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Judee K., Guerrero, Laura K., and Floyd, Kory. Nonverbal Communication. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Burke, Michael. Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion: An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Burke, Seán. The Death and Return of the Author: Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Byrskog, Samuel. Story as History – History as Story: The Gospel Tradition in the Context of Ancient Oral History. WUNT 1/123. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.Google Scholar
Calero, Henry H. The Power of Nonverbal Communication: How You Act Is More Important than What You Say. Los Angeles: Silver Lake, 2005.Google Scholar
Campbell, Paul Newell. Form and the Art of Theatre. Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin. The Haunted Stage: The Theatre as Memory Machine. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin. “Introduction – Perspectives on Performance: Germany and America.” Pages 1–10 in The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics. By Fischer-Lichte, Erika. Translated by Iris Jain, Saskya. London: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin. Performance: A Critical Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico. Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Chicago: Intellect, 2011.Google Scholar
Carr, David M. “The Many Uses of Intertextuality in Biblical Studies: Actual and Potential.” Pages 505–35 in Congress Volume Helsinki 2010. Edited by Nissinen, Martiti. VTSup 148. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. “Art, Narrative, and Emotions.” Pages 190–211 in Emotion and the Arts. Edited by Hjort, Mette and Laver, Sue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. “The Arts, Emotion, and Evolution.” Pages 159–80 in Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind. Edited by Currie, Greg, Kieran, Matthew, Meskin, Aaron, and Robson, Jon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Carson, D. A. The Gospel according to John. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar
Carter, Warren. Pontius Pilate: Portraits of a Roman Governor. Interfaces. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. “Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature.” Pages 35–53 in Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Edited by Tannen, Deborah. Advances in Discourse Processes 9. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1982.Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour B. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Chen, Xuhai, Pan, Zhihui, Wang, Ping, Yang, Xiaohong, Liu, Peng, You, Xuqun, and Yuan, Jiajin. “The Integration of Facial and Vocal Cues during Emotional Change Perception: EEG Markers.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 11 (2016): 1152–61.Google Scholar
Ciompi, Luc, and Panksepp, Jaak. “Energetic Effects of Emotions on Cognitions: Complementary Psychobiological and Psychosocial Findings.” Pages 23–55 in Consciousness and Emotion: Agency, Conscious Choice, and Selective Perception. Edited by Ellis, Ralph D. and Newton, Natika. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2005.Google Scholar
Cleary, Sandra, Harran, Marcelle, Lück, Jacqueline, Potgieter, Sally, Scheckle, Eileen, van der Merwe, Renée, and van Heerden, Karen. Communication: A Hands-on Approach. Edited by Cleary, Sandra. Lansdowne: Juta, 2009.Google Scholar
Cocchini, Gianna, Logie, Robert H., Sala, Sergio Della, MacPherson, Sarah E., and Baddeley, Alan D.. “Concurrent Performance of Two Memory Tasks: Evidence for Domain-Specific Working Memory Systems.” Memory and Cognition 30 (2002): 1086–95.Google Scholar
Collier, Gary. Emotional Expression. New York: Psychology, 2014.Google Scholar
Collins, Adela Yarbro. Mark: A Commentary. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007.Google Scholar
Collins, Christopher. The Poetics of the Mind’s Eye: Literature and the Psychology of Imagination. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Collins, James, and Blot, Richard K.. Literacy and Literacies: Texts, Power, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Conway, Andrew R. A., Macnamara, Brooke N., and Engel de Abreu, Pascale M. J.. “Working Memory and Intelligence: An Overview.” Pages 13–36 in Working Memory: The Connected Intelligence. Edited by Alloway, Tracy Packiam and Alloway, Ross G.. Frontiers of Cognitive Psychology. New York: Psychology, 2013.Google Scholar
Conway, Colleen M. “Speaking through Ambiguity: Minor Characters in the Fourth Gospel.” BibInt 10 (2002): 324–41.Google Scholar
Cook, Amy. “The Method and Potential of a Cognitive Scientific Approach to Theatre.” Theatre Journal 59 (2007): 579–94.Google Scholar
Coolidge, Fired L., Wynn, Thomas, and Overmann, Karenleigh A.. “The Evolution of Working Memory.” Pages 94–144 in Working Memory: The Connected Intelligence. Edited by Alloway, Tracy Packiam and Alloway, Ross G.. Frontiers of Cognitive Psychology. New York: Psychology, 2013.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Robert W. The Making of Theatre: From Drama to Performance. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1981.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Charles H. “Introduction.” Pages 1–22 in The Meanings We Choose: Hermeneutical Ethics, Indeterminacy and the Conflict of Interpretations. Edited by Cosgrove, Charles H.. LHBOTS. London: T & T Clark International, 2004.Google Scholar
Crocker, Laura D., Heller, Wendy, Warren, Stacie L., O’Hare, Aminda J., Infantolino, Zachary P., and Miller, Gregory A.. “Relationships among Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation: Implications for Intervention and Neuroplasticity in Psychopathology.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (2013): 1–19.Google Scholar
Crossan, John Dominic. “Mark and the Relatives of Jesus.” NovT 15 (1973): 81–113.Google Scholar
Crossan, John Dominic. The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant. New York: HarperCollins, 1991.Google Scholar
Culpepper, R. Alan. Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1983.Google Scholar
Culpepper, R. Alan. “Nicodemus: The Travail of New Birth.” Pages 249–59 in Character Studies in the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Hunt, Steven A., Tolmie, D. Francois, and Zimmermann, Ruben. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar
Czachesz, István, and Uro, Risto, eds. Mind, Morality and Magic: Cognitive Science Approaches in Biblical Studies. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
d’Aquili, Eugene, and Newberg, Andrew B.. Mystical Mind: Probing the Biology of Religious Experience. Theology and the Sciences. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1999.Google Scholar
Danker, Frederick W., Bauer, Walter, Arndt, William F., and Gingrich, F. Wilbur. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: Murray, 1872.Google Scholar
Davies, David. Philosophy of the Performing Arts. Foundations of the Philosophy of the Arts 4. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar
de Waal, Frans B. M., and Pollick, Amy S.. “Gesture as the Most Flexible Modality of Primate Communication.” Pages 82–89 in The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Edited by Tallerman, Maggie and Gibson, Kathleen R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Dehn, Milton J. Working Memory and Academic Learning: Assessment and Intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2008.Google Scholar
DeMaria, Robert. Samuel Johnson and the Life of Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Denny, J. Peter. “Rational Thought in Oral Culture and Literate Decontextualization.” Pages 66–89 in Literacy and Orality. Edited by Olson, David R. and Torrance, Nancy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Chakravorty Spivak, Gayatri. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Living On: Border Lines.” Pages 75–176 in Deconstruction and Criticism. Edited by Bloom, Harold, de Man, Paul, Derrida, Jacques, Hartman, Geoffrey, and Miller, J. Hills. New York, Seabury, 1979.Google Scholar
Dewey, Dennis Hart. “Off the Page, Into the Heart, and Out of the Mouth: Tools for Telling the Stories of Scripture by Heart.” CurTM 38 (2011): 448–58.Google Scholar
Dewey, Joanna. “The Survival of Mark’s Gospel: A Good Story?” JBL 123 (2004): 495–507.Google Scholar
Dewey, Joanna. “The Gospel of Mark as an Oral/Aural Event: Implications for Interpretation.” Pages 93–108 in The Oral Ethos of the Early Church. Biblical Performance Criticism 8. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2013.Google Scholar
Dewey, Kim E. “Peter’s Curse and Cursed Peter (Mark 14:53–54, 66–72).” Pages 96–114 in The Passion in Mark: Studies on Mark 14–16. Edited by Kelber, Werner H.. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976.Google Scholar
Di Benedetto, Stephen. The Provocation of the Senses in Contemporary Theatre. Routledge Advances in Theatre and Performance Studies 13. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
di Pellegrino, Giuseppe, Fadiga, Luciano, Fogassi, Leonardo, Gallese, Vittorio, and Rizzolatti, Giacomo. “Understanding Motor Events: A Neurophysiological Study.” Experimental Brain Research 91 (1992): 176–80.Google Scholar
Diergarten, Anna Katharina, and Nieding, Gerhild. “Online Emotional Inferences in Written and Auditory Texts: A Study with Children and Adults.” Reading and Writing 29 (2016): 1383–1407.Google Scholar
Doan, William, and Giles, Terry. Prophets, Performance, and Power: Performance Criticism of the Hebrew Bible. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Dolan, Jill. Utopia in Performance: Finding Hope at the Theater. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Donahue, John R., and Harrington, Daniel J.. The Gospel of Mark. SP 2. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Donald, Merlin. Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Dowd, Sharyn. Reading Mark: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Second Gospel. Reading the New Testament. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys, 2000.Google Scholar
Downs, William Missouri, Wright, Lou Anne, and Ramsey, Erik. The Art of Theatre: A Concise Introduction. 3rd ed. Boston: Wadsworth, 2013.Google Scholar
Draisma, Sipke, ed. Intertextuality in Biblical Writings: Essays in Honour of Bas van Iersel. Kampen: Kok, 1989.Google Scholar
Duke, Paul D. Irony in the Fourth Gospel. Atlanta: John Knox, 1985.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. “Altering the Default Setting: Re-envisaging the Early Transmission of the Jesus Tradition.” NTS 49 (2003): 139–75.Google Scholar
Eakins, Barbara Westbrook, and Eakins, Rollin Gene. Sex Differences in Human Communication. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1978.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald, and Tononi, Giulio. A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination. New York: Basic, 2000.Google Scholar
Edwards, James R. The Gospel according to Mark. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. Misquoting Jesus: The Story behind Who Changed the Bible and Why. New York: HarperOne, 2005.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenäus. “The Expressive Behavior of the Deaf-and-Blind Born.” Pages 163–94 in Social Communication and Movement: Studies of Interaction and Expression in Man and Chimpanzee. Edited by von Cranach, Mario and Vine, Ian. New York: Academic, 1973.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenäus. Ethology: The Biology of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1975.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul. Darwin and Facial Expression. New York: Academic, 1973.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul. “The Universal Smile: Face Muscles Talk Every Language.” Psychology Today 9 (1975): 35–39.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul. Emotions in the Human Face. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul. “An Argument for Basic Emotions.” Cognition and Emotion 6 (1992): 169–200.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V., and Ellsworth, Phoebe. Emotions in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings. New York: Pergamon, 1972.Google Scholar
Elam, Keir. The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. London: Methuen, 1980.Google Scholar
Elliott, John H. Beware the Evil Eye: The Evil Eye in the Bible and the Ancient World. 3 vols. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2015–16.Google Scholar
Elliott, Matthew A. Faithful Feelings: Rethinking Emotion in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2006.Google Scholar
Esrock, Ellen J. The Reader’s Eye: Visual Imaging as Reader Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Esslin, Martin. An Anatomy of Drama. New York: Hill and Wang, 1976.Google Scholar
Evans, Paul S. “Creating a New ‘Great Divide’: The Exoticization of Ancient Culture in Some Recent Applications of Orality Studies to the Bible.” JBL 136 (2017): 749–64.Google Scholar
Eve, Eric. Behind the Gospels: Understanding the Oral Tradition. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014.Google Scholar
Eversmann, Peter. “The Experience of the Theatrical Event.” Pages 139–74 in Theatrical Events: Borders, Dynamics, Frames. Edited by Cremona, Vicki Ann, Eversmann, Peter, van Maanen, Hans, Sauter, Willmar, and Tulloch, John. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2004.Google Scholar
Eysenck, Michael W. Psychology: An International Perspective. New York: Psychology, 2004.Google Scholar
Farrell, Simon, Oberauer, Klaus, Greaves, Martin, Pasiecznik, Kazimir, Lewandowsky, Sephan, and Jarrold, Christopher. “A Test of Interference versus Decay in Working Memory: Varying Distraction within Lists in a Complex Span Task.” Journal of Memory and Language 90 (2016): 66–87.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. New Testament Exegesis: A Handbook for Students and Pastors. 3rd ed. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2002.Google Scholar
Feng, Jinh, Pratt, Jay, and Spence, Ian. “Attention and Visuospatial Working Memory Share the Same Processing Resources.” Frontiers in Psychology 3 (2012): 1–11.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. “Plato and Poetry.” Pages 92–148 in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Volume 1: Classical Criticism. Edited by Kennedy, George A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Fine, Elizabeth C. The Folklore Text: From Performance to Print. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance and Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. Communicating: The Multiple Modes of Human Communication. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. Theatre, Sacrifice, Ritual: Exploring Forms of Political Theatre. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics. Translated by Iris Jain, Saskya. London: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. “Performance as Event – Reception as Transformation.” Pages 29–42 in Theorising Performance: Greek Drama, Cultural History and Critical Practice. Edited by Hall, Edith and Harrop, Stephe. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. The Routledge Introduction to Theatre and Performance Studies. Edited by Arjomand, Minou and Mosse, Ramona Translated by Arjomand, Minou. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Fischer, Steven R. A History of Reading. London: Reaktion, 2004.Google Scholar
Fishbane, Michael. Text and Texture: Close Readings of Selected Biblical Texts. New York: Schocken, 1979.Google Scholar
Fleischman, John. Phineas Gage: A Gruesome but True Story about Brain Science. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.Google Scholar
Foley, John Miles. Immanent Art: From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Foley, John Miles. The Singer of Tales in Performance. Voices in Performance and Text. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Foley, John Miles. How to Read an Oral Poem. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Fondacaro, Rocco, and Higgins, E. Tory. “Cognitive Consequences of Communication Mode: A Social Psychological Perspective.” Pages 73–101 in Literacy, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing. Edited by Olson, David R., Torrance, Nancy, and Hildyard, Angela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Donelson R. Group Dynamics. 6th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2014.Google Scholar
Foster, Jonathan K. Memory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Foster, Paul. “Echoes without Resonance: Critiquing Certain Aspects of Recent Scholarly Trends in the Study of the Jewish Scriptures in the New Testament.” JSNT 38 (2015): 96–111.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?” Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie 63 (1969): 73–104.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” Pages 113–38 in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Edited by Bouchard, Donald F.. Translated by Bouchard, Donald F. and Simon, Sherry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Fowler, Robert M. Let the Reader Understand: Reader-Response Criticism and the Gospel of Mark. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.Google Scholar
Fowler, Robert M. “Why Everything We Know about the Bible Is Wrong: Lessons from the Media History of the Bible.” Pages 3–18 in The Bible in Ancient and Modern Media. Edited by Hearon, Holly E. and Ruge-Jones, Philip. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2009.Google Scholar
France, R. T. The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary on the Greek Text. NIGTC. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Frei, Hans W. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Freshwater, Helen. Theatre & Audience. Theatre & Series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Friedenberg, Jay, and Silverman, Gordon. Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Study of Mind. London: Sage, 2006.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria, and Rodman, Robert. An Introduction to Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1983.Google Scholar
Furniss, Graham. Orality: The Power of the Spoken Word. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Galinsky, Karl. “Preface.” Pages v–vi in Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Edited by Galinsky, Karl. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio. “Mirror Neurons, Embodied Simulation, and the Neural Basis of Social Identification.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 19 (2009): 519–36.Google Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio, Fadiga, Luciano, Fogassi, Leonardo, and Rizzolatti, Giacomo. “Action Recognition in the Premotor Cortex.” Brain 119 (1996): 593–609.Google Scholar
Galotti, Kathleen M., Fernandes, Myra, Fugelsang, Jonathan, and Stolz, Jennifer. Cognitive Psychology: In and Out of the Laboratory. Toronto: Nelson, 2010.Google Scholar
Gamble, Harry Y. Books and Readers in the Early Church: A History of Early Christian Texts. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Gamel, Brian K. Mark 15:39 as a Markan Theology of Revelation: The Centurion’s Confession as Apocalyptic Unveiling. LNTS 574. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar
Garber, Jr., David, G. “Trauma Theory and Biblical Studies.” CurBR 14 (2015): 24–44.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor, 1959.Google Scholar
Goldstein, E. Bruce. Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research and Everyday Experience. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2011.Google Scholar
Goodkin, Richard E. How Do I Know Thee? Theatrical and Narrative Cognition in Seventeenth-Century France. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert. “Sympathy, Simulation, and the Impartial Spectator.” Pages 165–80 in Mind and Morals: Essays on Ethics and Cognitive Science. Edited by May, Larry, Friedman, Marilyn, and Clark, Andy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael J. Elements of Biblical Exegesis: A Basic Guide for Students and Ministers. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2009.Google Scholar
Gottwald, Christian. “Neurobiological Perspectives on Body Psychotherapy.” Pages 126–47 in The Handbook of Body Psychotherapy and Somatic Psychology. Edited by Marlock, Gustl, Weiss, Halko, Young, Courtenay, and Soth, Michael. Berkeley: North Atlantic, 2015.Google Scholar
Graf, Peter, and Birt, Angela R.. “Explicit and Implicit Memory Retrieval: Intentions and Strategies.” Pages 24–44 in Implicit Memory and Metacognition. Edited by Reder, Lynne M.. 2nd ed. New York: Psychology, 2014.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald. “Determinacy/Indeterminacy.” Page 163–76 in Critical Terms for Literary Study. Edited by Lentricchia, Frank and McLaughlin, Thomas. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Griggs, Richard A. Psychology: A Concise Introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Worth, 2009.Google Scholar
Grodal, Torben. Moving Pictures: A New Theory of Film Genres, Feelings, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Groome, David, Brace, Nicola, Edgar, Graham, Edgar, Helen, Eysenck, Michael, Manly, Tom, Ness, Hayley, Pike, Graham, Scott, Sophie, et al. An Introduction to Cognitive Psychology: Processes and Disorders. 3rd ed. London: Psychology, 2014.Google Scholar
Hall, Judith A., and Knapp, Mark L.. “Welcome to the Handbook of Nonverbal Communication.” Pages 3–8 in Nonverbal Communication. Edited by Hall, Judith A. and Knapp, Mark L.. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Hanich, Julian. Audience Effect: On the Collective Cinema Experience. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Harner, Philip B. “Qualitative Anarthrous Predicate Nouns: Mark 15:39 and John 1:1.” JBL 92 (1973): 75–87.Google Scholar
Harold, James. “A Moral Never-Never Land: Identifying with Tony Soprano.” Pages 137–46 in The Sopranos and Philosophy: I Kill Therefore I Am. Edited by Greene, Richard and Vernezze, Peter. Popular Culture and Philosophy 7. Peru, IL: Carus, 2004.Google Scholar
Harris, William V. Ancient Literacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hart, F. Elizabeth. “Performance, Phenomenology, and the Cognitive Turn.” Pages 29–51 in Performance and Cognition: Theatre Studies and the Cognitive Turn. Edited by McConachie, Bruce and Hart, F. Elizabeth. Routledge Advances in Theatre and Performance Studies. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Hasada, Rie. “Some Aspects of Japanese Cultural Ethos Embedded in Nonverbal Communicative Behavior.” Pages 83–104 in Nonverbal Communication and Translation: New Perspectives and Challenges in Literature, Interpretation and the Media. Edited by Poyatos, Fernando. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1997.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T., and Rapson, Richard L.. Emotional Contagion: Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. “Introduction: Evolution of Mind, Brain, and Culture.” Pages 1–44 in Evolution of Mind, Brain, and Culture. Edited by Hatfield, Gary and Pittman, Holly. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. The Conversion of the Imagination: Paul as Interpreter of Israel’s Scripture. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. “Forward to the English Edition.” Pages xi–xv in Reading the Bible Intertextually. Edited by Hays, Richard B., Alkier, Stefan, and Huizenga, Leroy A.. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. Reading Backwards: Figural Christology and the Fourfold Gospel Witness. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Gospels. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B., Alkier, Stefan, and Huizenga, Leroy A., eds. Reading the Bible Intertextually. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hearon, Holly E. “Characters in Text and Performance.” Pages 53–79 in From Text to Performance: Narrative and Performance Criticisms in Dialogue and Debate. Edited by Iverson, Kelly R.. Biblical Performance Criticism 10. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2014.Google Scholar
Heim, Caroline. Audience as Performer: The Changing Role of Theatre Audiences in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Henry, Lucy. The Development of Working Memory in Children. London: Sage, 2012.Google Scholar
Hertel, Ralf. Making Sense: Sense Perception in the British Novel of the 1980s and 1990s. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2005.Google Scholar
Hess, Ursula, Houde, Stephanie, and Fischer, Agneta. “Do We Mimic What We See or What We Know?” Pages 94–107 in Collective Emotions: Perspectives from Psychology, Philosophy, and Sociology. Edited by von Scheve, Christian and Salmela, Mikko. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hezser, Catherine. Jewish Literacy in Roman Palestine. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.Google Scholar
Hildyard, Angela, and Olson, David R.. “On the Comprehension and Memory of Oral vs. Written Discourse.” Pages 19–33 in Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Edited by Tannen, Deborah. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1982.Google Scholar
Hischak, Thomas S. Theatre as Human Action: An Introduction to Theatre Arts. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow, 2006.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, F. R. M. “Is the Fourth Gospel a Drama?” Pages 15–24 in The Gospel of John as Literature: An Anthology of Twentieth-Century Perspectives. Edited by Stibbe, Mark W. G.. Leiden: Brill, 1993.Google Scholar
Hockenbury, Don H., and Hockenbury, Sandra E.. Psychology. 3rd ed. New York: Worth, 2003.Google Scholar
Hockey, Katherine M. The Role of Emotion in 1 Peter. SNTSMS 173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Holland, Glenn S. “Playing to the Groundlings: Shakespeare Performance Criticism and Performance Criticism of Biblical Texts.” Neot 41 (2007): 317–40.Google Scholar
Hollander, John. The Figure of Echo: A Mode of Allusion in Milton and After. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Holtz, Jan Leslie. Applied Clinical Neuropsychology: An Introduction. New York: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
Homer, Bruce D. “Literacy and the Mediated Mind.” Pages 223–38 in The Development of the Mediated Mind: Sociocultural Context and Cognitive Development. Edited by Lucariello, Joan M. et al. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004.Google Scholar
Horrell, David G. “Social Sciences Studying Formative Christian Phenomena: A Creative Moment.” Pages 3–28 in Handbook of Early Christianity: Social Science Approaches. Edited by Blasi, Anthony J., Duhaime, Jean, and Turcotte, Paul-André. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira, 2002.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard A. Hearing the Whole Story: The Politics of Plot in Mark’s Gospel. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard A. “Introduction.” Pages vii–xvi in Performing the Gospel: Orality, Memory, and Mark. Edited by Horsley, Richard A., Draper, Jonathan A., and Miles Foley, John. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2006.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard A., and Draper, Jonathan A.. Whoever Hears You Hears Me: Prophets, Performance, and Tradition in Q. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 1999.Google Scholar
Huebenthal, Sandra. Reading Mark’s Gospel as a Text from Collective Memory. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2020.Google Scholar
Huntsinger, Jeffrey R., and Schnall, Simone. “Emotion-Cognition Interactions.” Pages 571–84 in The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology. Edited by Reisberg, Daniel. Oxford Library of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hupbach, Almut, Gomez, Rebecca, and Nadel, Lynn. “Memory Reconsolidation.” Pages 244–64 in The Wiley Handbook on the Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory. Edited by Addis, Donna Rose, Barense, Morgan, and Duarte, Audrey. Oxford: Wiley, 2015.Google Scholar
Hurley, Erin. Theatre & Feeling. Theatre & Series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. “Oral Fixation and New Testament Studies? ‘Orality,’ ‘Performance’ and Reading Texts in Early Christianity.” NTS 60 (2014): 321–40.Google Scholar
Hylen, Susan E. Imperfect Believers: Ambiguous Characters in the Gospel of John. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2009.Google Scholar
Hynkemejer, Flemming, and Dixit, Sudhir. “Human Bond Communication beyond 2050.” Pages 227–42 in Human Bond Communication: The Holy Grail of Holistic Communication and Immersive Experience. Edited by Dixit, Sudhir and Prasad, Ramjee. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2017.Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman. Cognition of the Literary Work of Art. Translated by Crowley, Ruth Ann and Olson, Kenneth R.. Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Irwin, William, ed. The Death and Resurrection of the Author? Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2002.Google Scholar
Iverson, Kelly R. “A Centurion’s ‘Confession’: A Performance-Critical Analysis of Mark 15:39.” JBL 130 (2011): 329–50.Google Scholar
Iverson, Kelly R. “An Enemy of the Gospel? Anti-Paulinisms and Intertextuality in the Gospel of Matthew.” Pages 7–32 in Unity and Diversity in the Gospels and Paul: Essays in Honor of Frank J. Matera. Edited by Skinner, Christopher W. and Iverson, Kelly R. Early Christianity and Its Literature. Atlanta: SBL, 2012.Google Scholar
Iverson, Kelly R. “The Present Tense of Performance: Immediacy and Transformative Power in Luke’s Passion.” Pages 131–57 in From Text to Performance: Narrative and Performance Criticisms in Dialogue and Debate. Edited by Iverson, Kelly R.. Biblical Performance Criticism 10. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2014.Google Scholar
Iverson, Kelly R. “Oral Fixation or Oral Corrective? A Response to Larry Hurtado.” NTS 62 (2016): 183–200.Google Scholar
Iverson, Kelly R. “‘Who Do You Say That I Am?’ Characters and Characterization in Narrative and Performance.” Pages 51–67 in Let the Reader Understand: Essays in Honor of Elizabeth Struthers Malbon. Edited by Broadhead, Edwin K.. LNTS 384. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.Google Scholar
Jack, Alison M. The Bible and Literature. London: SCM, 2012.Google Scholar
Jacob-Dazarola, Rubén, Nicolás, Juan Carlos Ortíz, and Bayona, Lina Cárdenas. “Behavioral Measures of Emotion.” Pages 101–24 in Emotion Measurement. Edited by Meiselman, Herbert L.. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2016.Google Scholar
Jahandarie, Khosrow. Spoken and Written Discourse: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective. Contemporary Studies in International Political Communication. Stamford: Ablex, 1999.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic. Theatre & the Visual. Theatre & Series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Johnson, Earl S. “Is Mark 15:39 the Key to Mark’s Christology?” JSNT 31 (1987): 3–22.Google Scholar
Johnson, William A., and Parker, Holt N.. Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Jolicoeur, Pierre, Lefebvre, Christine, and Martinez-Trujillo, Julio, eds. Mechanisms of Sensory Working Memory: Attention and Performance XXV. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016.Google Scholar
Judd, Charles, and Buswell, Guy. Silent Reading: A Study of the Various Types. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1922.Google Scholar
Juel, Donald H. A Master of Surprise: Mark Interpreted. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1994.Google Scholar
Juel, Donald H. The Gospel of Mark. Interpreting Biblical Texts. Nashville: Abingdon, 1999.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar
Kalyuga, Slava. Managing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Multimedia Learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2009.Google Scholar
Kalyuga, Slava. “Schema Acquisition and Sources of Cognitive Load.” Pages 48–64 in Cognitive Load Theory. Edited by Plass, Jan L., Moreno, Roxana, and Brünken, Roland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kastely, James L. The Rhetoric of Plato’s Republic: Democracy and the Philosophical Problem of Persuasion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Keener, Craig S. Christobiography: Memory, History, and the Reliability of the Gospels. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2019.Google Scholar
Kelber, Werner H. The Kingdom in Mark: A New Place and a New Time. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1974.Google Scholar
Kelber, Werner H. The Oral and the Written Gospel: The Hermeneutics of Speaking and Writing in the Synoptic Tradition, Mark, Paul, and Q. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1983.Google Scholar
Kelber, Werner H. Imprints, Voiceprints, and Footprints of Memory: Collected Essays of Werner H. Kelber. Atlanta: SBL, 2013.Google Scholar
Kelber, Werner H., and Byrskog, Samuel, eds. Jesus in Memory: Traditions in Oral and Scribal Perspectives. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Ronald T. Cognitive Psychology. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Ronald T. Fundamentals of Cognitive Psychology. Los Angeles: Sage, 2007.Google Scholar
Keltner, Dacher, and Cordaro, Daniel T.. “Understanding Multimodal Emotional Expressions: Recent Advances in Basic Emotion Theory.” Pages 57–76 in The Science of Facial Expression. Edited by Fernández-Dols, José-Miguel and Russell, James A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Kemp, Rick. Embodied Acting: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Performance. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. The Genesis of Secrecy: On the Interpretation of Narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Kern, Richard. Literacy and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kerr, Lucille. Reclaiming the Author: Figures and Fictions from Spanish America. Durham: Duke University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kershaw, Baz. Theatre Ecology: Environments and Performance Events. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Kim, Tae Hun. “The Anarthrous υἱὸς θεοῦ in Mark 15,39 and the Roman Imperial Cult.” Bib 79 (1998): 221–41.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Jack Dean. The Christology of Mark’s Gospel. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1983.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Jack Dean. Conflict in Mark: Jesus, Authorities, Disciples. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar
Kirk, Alan. Memory and the Jesus Tradition: The Reception of Jesus in the First Three Centuries. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.Google Scholar
Kirk, Alan, and Thatcher, Tom, eds. Memory, Tradition, and Text: Uses of the Past in Early Christianity. SemeiaSt 52. Atlanta: SBL, 2005.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen B., and Thorne, B. Michael. Biological Psychology. New York: Worth, 2007.Google Scholar
Knapp, Mark L., Hall, Judith A., and Horgan, Terrence G.. Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction. 8th ed. Boston: Wadsworth, 2013.Google Scholar
Kravetz, Lee Daniel. Strange Contagion: Inside the Surprising Science of Infectious Behaviors and Viral Emotions and What They Tell Us about Ourselves. New York: Harper Wave, 2017.Google Scholar
Kreifelts, Benjamin, Ethofer, Thomas, Grodd, Wolfgang, Erb, Michael, and Wildgruber, Dirk. “Audiovisual Integration of Emotional Signals in Voice and Face: An Event-Related FMRI Study.” NeuroImage 37 (2007): 1445–56.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Karl Allen. The Heart of Biblical Narrative: Rediscovering Biblical Appeal to the Emotions. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2009.Google Scholar
Kürschner, Christian, Schnotz, Wolfgang, and Eid, Michael. “Konstruktion mentaler Repräsentationen beim Hör- und Leseverstehen.” Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie 18 (2006): 48–59.Google Scholar
Lampinen, James Michael, and Beike, Denise R.. Memory 101. New York: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Lapakko, David. “Three Cheers for Language: A Closer Examination of a Widely Cited Study of Nonverbal Communication.” Communication Education 46 (1997): 63–67.Google Scholar
Lapteva, Oxana. Speaker Perception and Recognition: An Integrative Framework for Computational Speech Processing. Kassel: Kassel University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Louise. “Exploring the Sense-Scape of the Gospel of Mark.” JSNT 33 (2011): 387–97.Google Scholar
Lazarowicz, Klaus. “Triadische Kollusion. Über die Beziehung zwischen Autor, Schauspieler und Zuschauer im Theater.” Pages 44–60 in Das Theater und sein Publikum. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1977.Google Scholar
Le Donne, Anthony. The Historiographical Jesus: Memory, Typology, and the Son of David. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Leahy, Wayne, and Sweller, John. “Cognitive Load Theory, Modality of Presentation and the Transient Information Effect.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 25 (2011): 943–51.Google Scholar
Leathers, Dale G. Nonverbal Communication Systems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1976.Google Scholar
Leathers, Dale G., and Eaves, Michael. Successful Nonverbal Communication: Principles and Applications. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Lee, Dorothy A. “Martha and Mary: Levels of Characterization in Luke and John.” Pages 197–220 in Characters and Characterization in the Gospel of John. Edited by Skinner, Christopher W.. LNTS 461. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Lee, Margaret E., ed. Sound Matters: New Testament Studies in Sound Mapping. Biblical Performance Criticism 16. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2018.Google Scholar
Lee, Margaret E., and Scott, Bernard Brandon. Sound Mapping the New Testament. Salem: Polebridge, 2009.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Keltner, Dacher. “Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion-Specific Influences on Judgement and Choice.” Cognition and Emotion 14 (2000): 473–93.Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper, 1951.Google Scholar
Liapis, Vayos, Panayotakis, Costas, and Harrison, George W. M.. “Introduction: Making Sense of Ancient Performance.” Pages 1–42 in Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre. Edited by Harrison, George W. M. and Liapis, Vayos. Mnemosyne Supplements: Monographs on Greek and Latin Language and Literature 353. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Licht, Jacob. Storytelling in the Bible. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1978.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Andrew T. “The Lazarus Story: A Literary Perspective.” Pages 211–32 in The Gospel of John and Christian Theology. Edited by Bauckham, Richard and Mosser, Carl. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Logie, John. “The (Re)Birth of the Composer.” Pages 175–89 in Composition and Copyright: Perspectives on Teaching, Text-Making, and Fair Use. Edited by Westbrook, Steve. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Logie, Robert H. Visuo-Spatial Working Memory. London: Psychology, 1995.Google Scholar
Lohr, Linda L., and Gall, James E.. “Representative Strategies.” Pages 85–96 in Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Edited by Spector, Michael J., Merrill, M. David, van Merriënboer, Jeroen, and Driscoll, Marcy. 3rd ed. New York: Erlbaum, 2008.Google Scholar
Loxley, Robert B. “Roles of the Audience: Aesthetic and Social Dimensions of the Performance Event.” Literature in Performance 3 (1983): 40–44.Google Scholar
Low, Renae, and Sweller, John. “The Modality Principle in Multimedia Learning.” Pages 227–46 in The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Edited by Mayer, Richard E.. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Low, Renae, Jin, Putai, and Sweller, John. “Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design in a Multimedia Context.” Pages 1–16 in Cognitive Effects of Multimedia Learning. Edited by Zheng, Robert Z.. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2009.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Michael C. A. “Literacy in an Oral Environment.” Pages 49–118 in Writing and Ancient Near Eastern Society Papers in Honor of Alan R. Millard. Edited by Bienkowski, Piotr, Mee, Christopher, and Slater, Elizabeth. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Machon, Josephine. “Watching, Attending, Sense-Making: Spectatorship in Immersive Theatres.” Journal of Contemporary Drama in English 4 (2016): 34–48.Google Scholar
Macmillan, Malcolm. An Odd Kind of Fame: Stories of Phineas Gage. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Malbon, Elizabeth Struthers. “Narrative Criticism: How Does the Story Mean?” Pages 23–49 in Mark and Method: New Approaches in Biblical Studies. Edited by Capel Anderson, Janice and Moore, Stephen D.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1992.Google Scholar
Malina, Bruce J. The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001.Google Scholar
Malone, Andrew S. “Acceptable Anachronism in Biblical Studies,” BT 67 (2016): 351–64.Google Scholar
Mancing, Howard. “See the Play, Read the Book.” Pages 189–206 in Performance and Cognition: Theatre Studies and the Cognitive Turn. Edited by McConachie, Bruce and Hart, F. Elizabeth. Routledge Advances in Theatre and Performance Studies. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Manguel, Alberto. A History of Reading. New York: Penguin, 1996.Google Scholar
Marcus, Joel. Mark 8–16: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AB 27A. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Mathews, Jeanette. Performing Habakkuk: Faithful Re-enactment in the Midst of Crisis. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2012.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, David. “Culture and Nonverbal Behavior.” Pages 219–35 in The Sage Handbook of Nonverbal Communication. Edited by Manusov, Valerie and Patterson, Miles L.. London: Sage, 2006.Google Scholar
McAuley, Gay. Space in Performance: Making Meaning in the Theatre. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar
McConachie, Bruce. Engaging Audiences: A Cognitive Approach to Spectating in the Theatre. Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
McConachie, Bruce. Theatre & Mind. Theatre & Series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
McConachie, Bruce. Evolution, Cognition, and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Karl. Experiencing Irony in the First Gospel: Suspense, Surprise and Curiosity. LNTS 488. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
McIver, Robert K. Memory, Jesus, and the Synoptic Gospels. RBS 59. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Steven L., and Haynes, Stephen R., eds. To Each Its Own Meaning: An Introduction to Biblical Criticisms and Their Application. Rev. and exp. ed. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1999.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: Mentor, 1964.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert. Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes. Belmont: Wadsworth, 1971.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert. Nonverbal Communication. London: AldineTransaction, 1972.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce Manning. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University, 1992.Google Scholar
Michaelian, Kourken. Mental Time Travel: Episodic Memory and Our Knowledge of the Personal Past. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Millard, Alan. Reading and Writing in the Time of Jesus. New York: New York University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review 63 (1956): 81–97.Google Scholar
Miller, George A., Galanter, Eugene, and Pribram, Karl H.. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, 1960.Google Scholar
Mlakuzhyil, George. The Christocentric Literary-Dramatic Structure of John’s Gospel. 2nd ed. AnBib 117. Rome: Gregorian & Biblical Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Moloney, Francis J. The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2002.Google Scholar
Moore, Stephen D. Literary Criticism and the Gospels: The Theoretical Challenge. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert, and Barton, John. Biblical Interpretation. Oxford Bible Series. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Morreale, Sherwyn P., Spitzberg, Brian H., and Barge, J. Kevin. Human Communication: Motivation, Knowledge, and Skills. 2nd ed. Belmont: Thomson, 2007.Google Scholar
Morrison, Gregg S. The Turning Point in the Gospel of Mark: A Study in Markan Christology. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2014.Google Scholar
Moyise, Steve. “Intertextuality and Biblical Studies: A Review.” Verbum et Ecclesia 23 (2002): 418–31.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Kevin, and Scherer, Klaus R.. “Toward a Working Definition of Emotion.” Emotion Review 4 (2012): 345–57.Google Scholar
Myllykoski, Matti. “Mark’s Oral Practice and the Written Gospel of Mark.” Pages 97–113 in Testimony and Interpretation: Early Christology in Its Judeo-Hellenistic Milieu. Studies in Honor of Petr Pokorný. Edited by Roskovec, Jan and Mrazek, Jiri. London: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar
Nairne, James S. “Sensory and Working Memory.” Pages 423–46 in Experimental Psychology. Edited by Healy, Alice F. and Proctor, Robert W.. Handbook of Psychology 4. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003.Google Scholar
Nässelqvist, Dan. Public Reading in Early Christianity: Lectors, Manuscripts, and Sound in the Oral Delivery of John 1–4. SNTSMS 163. Boston: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Neath, Ian, and Surprenant, Aimée M.. Human Memory: An Introduction to Research, Data, and Theory. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2003.Google Scholar
Nell, Victor. Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Nevid, Jeffrey S. Psychology: Concepts and Applications. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2013.Google Scholar
Neyrey, Jerome H. The Gospel of John in Cultural and Rhetorical Perspective. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Nightingale, Virginia. Studying Audiences: The Shock of the Real. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Niles, John D. Homo Narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Nystrand, Martin. “The Role of Context in Written Communication.” Pages 197–214 in Comprehending Oral and Written Language. Edited by Horowitz, Rosalind and Samuels, S. Jay. New York: Academic, 1987.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Gerard, and Jureidini, Jon. “Dispensing with the Dynamic Unconscious.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 9 (2002): 140–53.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Kelli S. The Use of Scripture in the Markan Passion Narrative. LNTS 384. London: T&T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar
Oestreich, Bernhard. Performance Criticism of the Pauline Letters. Translated by Elias, Lindsay and Blum, Brent. Biblical Performance Criticism 14. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2016.Google Scholar
Oliver, Mary Beth, and Bartsch, Anne. “Appreciation as Audience Response: Exploring Entertainment Gratifications beyond Hedonism.” Human Communication Research 36 (2010): 53–81.Google Scholar
Olson, David R. The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New Accents. London: Methuen, 1982.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. Foreword to The Oral and the Written Gospel: The Hermeneutics of Speaking and Writing in the Synoptic Tradition, Mark, Paul, and Q. By Kelber, Werner H.. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1983.Google Scholar
Paas, Fred, Renkl, Alexander, and Sweller, John. “Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments.” Educational Psychologist 38 (2003): 1–4.Google Scholar
Paivio, Allan. Mental Representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Parker, David C. The Living Text of the Gospels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Parker, Holt N. “Books and Reading Latin Poetry.” Pages 186–225 in Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. Edited by Johnson, William A. and Parker, Holt N.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Parry, Roger. The Ascent of Media: From Gilgamesh to Google via Gutenberg. London: Nicholas Brealey, 2011.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. Pensées: Rétablies suivant le plan de l’auteur. Paris: Lagny, 1870.Google Scholar
Paschal, R. Wade Jr.. “Lazarus.” Pages 461–63 in Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. Edited by Green, Joel, McKnight, Scot, and Marshall, I. Howard. Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 1992.Google Scholar
Passow, Wilfried. “The Analysis of Theatrical Performance: The State of the Art.” Translated by Strauss, R.. Poetics Today 2 (1981): 237–54.Google Scholar
Patterson, Miles L. More than Words: The Power of Nonverbal Communication. Communicating with and about Society. Barcelona: Aresta, 2011.Google Scholar
Pavis, Patrice. Dictionary of the Theatre: Terms, Concepts, and Analysis. Translated by Carlson, Marvin. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Pearson, David G. “Visuospatial Rehearsal Processes in Working Memory.” Pages 231–45 in The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory. Edited by Osaka, Naoyuki, Logie, Robert H., and D’Esposito, Mark. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Perry, Peter S. Insights from Performance Criticism. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2016.Google Scholar
Perry, Peter S. “Biblical Performance Criticism: Survey and Prospects.” Religions 10 (2019). doi:10.3390/rel10020117.Google Scholar
Pfister, Manfred. The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Translated by Halliday, John. European Studies in English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Planalp, Sally. Communicating Emotion: Social, Moral, and Cultural Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Carl. Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator’s Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Plass, Jan L., Moreno, Roxana, and Brünken, Roland. “Introduction.” Pages 1–6 in Cognitive Load Theory. Edited by Plass, Jan L., Moreno, Roxana, and Brünken, Roland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Plato. Republic. Edited and translated by Emlyn-Jones, Christopher and Preddy, William. 2 vols. LCL. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Pliny the Younger. Letters. Translated by Radice, Betty. 2 vols. LCL. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Plotnik, Rod, and Kouyoumdjian, Haig. Introduction to Psychology. 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2011.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., and Clarke, Kent D.. “What Is Exegesis? An Analysis of Various Definitions.” Pages 3–21 in A Handbook to the Exegesis of the New Testament. Edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Powell, Mark Allan. What Is Narrative Criticism? GBS: New Testament Series. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar
Poyatos, Fernando. Nonverbal Communication across Disciplines: Culture, Sensory Interaction, Speech, Conversation. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2002.Google Scholar
Procter, James. Stuart Hall. Routledge Critical Thinkers. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Quinn, Kenneth. “The Poet and His Audience in the Augustan Age.” ANRW 30.1:75–180.Google Scholar
Reichl, Susanne. Cognitive Principles, Critical Practice: Reading Literature at University. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2009.Google Scholar
Rensberger, David. Johannine Faith and Liberating Community. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1988.Google Scholar
Resseguie, James L. Narrative Criticism of the New Testament: An Introduction. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2005.Google Scholar
Revlin, Russell. Cognition: Theory and Practice. New York: Worth, 2013.Google Scholar
Rhoads, David. Reading Mark: Engaging the Gospel. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2004.Google Scholar
Rhoads, David. “Performance Criticism: An Emerging Methodology in Second Temple Studies – Part I.” BTB 36 (2006a): 118–33.Google Scholar
Rhoads, David. “Performance Criticism: An Emerging Methodology in Second Temple Studies – Part II.” BTB 36 (2006b): 164–84.Google Scholar
Rhoads, David. “What Is Performance Criticism?” Pages 83–100 in The Bible in Ancient and Modern Media: Story and Performance. Edited by Hearon, Holly E. and Ruge-Jones, Philip. Biblical Performance Criticism 1. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2009.Google Scholar
Rhoads, David. “Performance Events in Early Christianity: New Testament Writings in an Oral Context.” Pages 166–93 in The Interface of Orality and Writing: Speaking, Seeing, Writing in the Shaping of New Genres. Edited by Weissenrieder, Annette and Coote, Robert B.. Biblical Performance Criticism 11. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2015.Google Scholar
Rhoads, David. “Biblical Performance Criticism: Performance as Research.” Pages 188–239 in Oral-Scribal Dimensions of Scripture, Piety, and Practice: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Edited by Kelber, Werner H. and Sanders, Paula A.. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2016.Google Scholar
Rhoads, David. “Performance Criticism (Biblical).” Pages 281–89 in The Dictionary of the Bible and Ancient Media. Edited by Thatcher, Tom, Keith, Chris, Person, Raymond F. Jr., and Stern, Elsie R.. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar
Rhoads, David, Dewey, Joanna, and Michie, Donald. Mark as Story: An Introduction to the Narrative of a Gospel. 3rd ed. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2012.Google Scholar
Rhoads, David, and Dewey, Joanna. “Performance Criticism: A Paradigm Shift in New Testament Studies.” Pages 1–26 in From Text to Performance: Narrative and Performance Criticisms in Dialogue and Debate. Edited by Iverson, Kelly R.. Biblical Performance Criticism 10. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2014.Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London: Methuen, 1983.Google Scholar
Robbins, Vernon K. Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-rhetorical Interpretations. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1996.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Rafael. Structuring Early Christian Memory: Jesus in Tradition, Performance and Text. LNTS 407. London: T&T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar
Rokotnitz, Naomi. “‘It Is Required/You Do Awake Your Faith’: Learning to Trust the Body through Performing The Winter’s Tale.” Pages 122–46 in Performance and Cognition: Theatre Studies and the Cognitive Turn. Edited by McConachie, Bruce and Hart, F. Elizabeth. Routledge Advances in Theatre and Performance Studies. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald L., Hafer, Teresa, and Arata, Kevin. “Reading and Listening in Oral-Based versus Literate-Based Discourse.” Communication Education 49 (2000): 121–33.Google Scholar
Ruge-Jones, Philip. “Those Sitting around Jesus: Situating the Storyteller within Mark’s Gospel.” Pages 27–52 in From Text to Performance: Narrative and Performance Criticism in Dialogue and Debate. Edited by Iverson, Kelly R.. Biblical Performance Criticism 10. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2014.Google Scholar
Rushton, Rik. The Power of Connection: How to Become a Master Communicator in Your Workplace, Your Head Space and at Your Place. Milton: Wiley, 2018.Google Scholar
Russell, James A. “Introduction to Special Section: On Defining Emotion.” Emotion Review 4 (2012): 337.Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. “Space.” Pages 420–33 in Handbook of Narratology. Edited by Hühn, Peter et al. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2009.Google Scholar
Sadoski, Mark, and Paivio, Allan, Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Saenger, Paul. Space between Words: The Origins of Silent Reading. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Samovar, Larry A., Porter, Richard E., McDaniel, Edwin R., and Roy, Carolyn S.. Communication between Cultures. 9th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2017.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Schacter, Daniel L. Searching for Memory: The Brain, the Mind, and the Past. New York: Basic, 1996.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. Performance Theory. Routledge Classics. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. Performance Studies: An Introduction. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R. “What Does a Facial Expression Express?” Pages 139–65 in International Review of Studies on Emotion. Edited by Strongman, K. T.. New York: Wiley, 1992.Google Scholar
Schnotz, Wolfgang. “Why Multimedia Learning Is Not Always Helpful.” Pages 17–42 in Understanding Multimedia Documents. Edited by Rouet, Jean-François, Lowe, Richard, and Schnotz, Wolfgang. New York: Springer, 2008.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Johannes. “Die Christologie des Markusevangeliums: Beobachtungen zur Theologie und Komposition des zweiten Evangeliums.” ZTK 58 (1961): 154–83.Google Scholar
Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth. Democratizing Biblical Studies: Toward an Emancipatory Educational Space. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2009.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bennett L. Tip-of-the-Tongue States: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Lexical Retrieval. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bennett L. Memory: Foundations and Applications. Los Angeles: Sage, 2011.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bennett L., and Brown, Alan S., eds. Tip-of-the-Tongue States and Related Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Scott, Matthew. The Hermeneutics of Christological Psalmody in Paul: An Intertextual Enquiry. SNTSMS 158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Sell, Aaron, Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John. “The Human Anger Face Evolved to Enhance Cues of Strength.” Evolution of Human Behavior 35 (2014): 425–29.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, Nicola. Applying Performance: Live Art, Socially Engaged Theatre and Affective Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Simon. The Cambridge Introduction to Performance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Simon, and Wallis, Mick. Drama/Theatre/Performance. The New Critical Idiom. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Shiell, William D. Reading Acts: The Lector and the Early Christian Audience. BibInt 70. Boston: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Shiell, William D. Delivering from Memory: The Effect of Performance on the Early Christian Audience. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2011.Google Scholar
Shiner, Whitney Taylor. Proclaiming the Gospel: First-Century Performance of Mark. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2003.Google Scholar
Simmons, Annette. The Story Factor: Inspiration, Influence, and Persuasion through the Art of Storytelling. New York: Basic, 2001.Google Scholar
Simons, Daniel J., and Chabris, Christopher F.. “Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events.” Perception 28 (1999): 1059–74.Google Scholar
Sindoni, Maria Grazia. Spoken and Written Discourse in Online Interactions: A Multimodal Approach. Routledge Studies in Multimodality. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Skinner, Christopher W. “Telling the Story: The Appearance and Impact of Mark as Story.” Pages 1–16 in Mark as Story: Retrospect and Prospect. Edited by Iverson, Kelly R. and Skinner, Christopher W.. RBS 65. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.Google Scholar
Skinner, Christopher W. “The Study of Character(s) in the Gospel of Mark: A Survey of Research from Wrede to the Performance Critics (1901–2014).” Pages 3–34 in Character Studies and the Gospel of Mark. Edited by Ryan Hauge, Matthew and Skinner, Christopher W.. LNTS 483. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
Sommer, Monika, Hajak, Göran, Döhnel, Katrin, Schwerdtner, Johannes, Meinhardt, Jörg, and Müller, Jürgen L.. “Integration of Emotion and Cognition in Patients with Psychopathy.” Pages 457–66 in Understanding Emotions. Edited by Anders, Silke, Ende, Gabriele, Junghöfer, Markus, Kissler, Johanna, and Wildgruber, Dirk. Progress in Brain Research 156. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006.Google Scholar
Starr, Raymond J. “Reading Aloud: Lectores and Roman Reading.” CJ 86 (1991): 337–43.Google Scholar
States, Bert O. “Performance as Metaphor.” Pages 108–37 in vol. 1 of Performance: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies. Edited by Auslander, Philip. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Stefanucci, Jeanine. “Emotional High: Emotion and the Perception of Spatial Layout.” Pages 273–97 in Social Psychology of Visual Perception. Edited by Balcetis, Emily and Lassiter, G. Daniel. New York: Psychology, 2010.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Sheila. An Introduction to Communication Studies. Cape Town: Juta, 2007.Google Scholar
Stern, Tom. Philosophy and Theatre: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Meir. The Poetics of Biblical Narrative. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Steussy, Marti J. “Long-Term/Short-Term Memory.” Pages 210–12 in The Dictionary of the Bible and Ancient Media. Edited by Thatcher, Tom, Keith, Chris, Person, Raymond F. Jr., and Stern, Elsie R.. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar
Sticht, Thomas G., and James, James H.. “Listening and Reading.” Pages 293–317 in Handbook of Reading Research. Edited by Pearson, P. David, Barr, Rebecca, Kamil, Michael L., and Mosenthal, Peter. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Strine, Mary S., Long, Beverly Whitaker, and Hopkins, Mary Frances. “Research in Interpretation and Performance Studies: Trends, Issues, Priorities.” Pages 181–204 in Speech Communication: Essays to Commemorate the 75th Anniversary of the Speech Communication Association. Edited by Phillips, Gerald M. and Wood, Julia T.. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, Peter A. Is There an Author in This Text?: Discovering the Otherness of the Text. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2013.Google Scholar
Swanson, Richard W. Provoking the Gospel: Methods to Embody Biblical Storytelling through Drama. Cleveland: Pilgrim, 2004.Google Scholar
Swanson, Richard W. Provoking the Gospel of Mark: A Storyteller’s Commentary, Year B. Cleveland: Pilgrim, 2005.Google Scholar
Swanson, Richard W. “Truth, Method, and Multiplicity: Performance as a Mode of Interpretation.” CurTM 37 (2010): 312–19.Google Scholar
Sweller, John. “Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning.” Cognitive Science 12 (1988): 257–85.Google Scholar
Sweller, John. “Cognitive Technology: Some Procedures for Facilitating Learning and Problem Solving in Mathematics and Science.” Journal of Educational Psychology 81 (1989): 457–66.Google Scholar
Sweller, John. “Cognitive Load Theory: Recent Theoretical Advances.” Pages 29–47 in Cognitive Load Theory. Edited by Plass, Jan L., Moreno, Roxana, and Brünken, Roland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010a.Google Scholar
Sweller, John. “Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous and Germane Cognitive Load.” Educational Psychology Review 22 (2010b): 123–38.Google Scholar
Sweller, John, Ayres, Paul, and Kalyuga, Slava. Cognitive Load Theory: Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies. New York: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
Tannehill, Robert C. “The Gospel of Mark as Narrative Christology.” Semeia 16 (1979): 57–95.Google Scholar
Tannehill, Robert C. “The Disciples in Mark: The Function of a Narrative Role.” Pages 134–57 in The Interpretation of Mark. Edited by Telford, William R.. 2nd ed. Issues in Religion and Theology 7. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1995.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. “Relative Focus on Involvement in Oral and Written Discourse.” Pages 124–47 in Literacy, Language, and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing. Edited by Olson, David R., Torrance, Nancy, and Hildyard, Angela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. That’s Not What I Meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Your Relations with Others. New York: Ballantine, 1986.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Taylor, Annette Kujawski. “Introduction: Historical Overview of the Study of Human Memory.” Page xxxv–xliii in Encyclopedia of Human Memory. Edited by Taylor, Annette Kujawski. 3 vols. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood, 2013.Google Scholar
Thatcher, Tom. Why John Wrote a Gospel: Jesus – Memory – History. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2006.Google Scholar
Thatcher, Tom. ed. Memory and Identity in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity. Atlanta: SBL, 2014.Google Scholar
Thomas, Rosalind. Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992a.Google Scholar
Thomas, Rosalind. Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992b.Google Scholar
Thompson, Richard F., and Madigan, Stephen A.. Memory: The Key to Consciousness. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Tierno, Michael. Aristotle’s Poetics for Screenwriters: Storytelling Secrets from the Greatest Mind in Western Civilization. New York: Hyperion, 2002.Google Scholar
Tindall-Ford, Sharon, Chandler, Paul, and Sweller, John. “When Two Sensory Modes Are Better than One.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3 (1997): 257–87.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Mary Ann. Sowing the Gospel: Mark’s World in Literary-Historical Perspective. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar
Townsend, David J., Carrithers, Caroline, and Bever, Thomas G.. “Listening and Reading Processes in College- and Middle School-Age Readers.” Pages 217–42 in Comprehending Oral and Written Language. Edited by Horowitz, Rosalind and Samuels, S. Jay. San Diego: Academic, 1987.Google Scholar
Tracey, Diane H., and Morrow, Lesley Mandel. Lenses on Reading: An Introduction to Theories and Models. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford, 2012.Google Scholar
Trainor, Michael F. The Quest for Home: The Household in Mark’s Community. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Trocmé, Étienne. La formation de l’Évangile selon Marc. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1963.Google Scholar
Tsapkini, Kyrana, and Hillis, Argye E.. “Cognitive Neuroscience of Written Language: Neural Substrates of Reading and Writing.” Pages 491–506 in The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience. Edited by Ochsner, Kevin and Kosslyn, Stephen M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Tulving, Endel. “Concepts of Memory.” Pages 33–43 in The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Edited by Tulving, Endel and Craik, Fergus I. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000a.Google Scholar
Tulving, Endel. “Introduction.” Pages 727–32 in The New Cognitive Neurosciences. Edited by Gazzaniga, Michael S.. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000b.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H. Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Tyson, Joseph B. “The Blindness of the Disciples in Mark.” JBL 80 (1961): 261–68.Google Scholar
Umiltà, Maria Alessandra. “The ‘Mirror Mechanism’ and Motor Behavior.” Pages 15–22 in Theatre and Cognitive Neuroscience. Edited by Falletti, Clelia, Sofia, Gabriele, and Jacono, Victor. Performance and Science: Interdisciplinary Dialogues. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar
Vaage, Margrethe Bruun. “Blinded by Familiarity: Partiality, Morality, and Engagement with Television Series.” Pages 268–84 in Cognitive Media Theory. Edited by Nannicelli, Ted and Taberham, Paul. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Vaage, Margrethe Bruun. The Antihero in American Television. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
van Gorp, Trevor, and Adams, Edie. Design for Emotion. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012.Google Scholar
van Iersel, Bas M. F. Mark: A Reader-Response Commentary. Translated by Bisscheroux, W. H.. JSNTSup 164. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar
van Wolde, Ellen. “Trendy Intertextuality?” Pages 43–49 in Intertextuality in Biblical Writings: Essays in Honour of Bas van Iersel. Edited by Draisma, Sipke. Kampen: Kok, 1989.Google Scholar
Vidal, Karina. “A Comparison of the Effects of Reading and Listening on Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition.” Language Learning 61 (2011): 219–58.Google Scholar
Voorwinde, Stephen. Jesus’ Emotions in the Fourth Gospel: Human or Divine? LNTS 284. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Voorwinde, Stephen. Jesus’ Emotions in the Gospels. London: T&T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar
Ward, Richard F., and Trobisch, David J.. Bringing the Word to Life. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2013.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. “Ambiguity Avoidance Is Overrated.” Pages 29–49 in Ambiguity: Language and Communication. Edited by Winkler, Susanne. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis. Paul and the Hermeneutics of Faith. 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Beavin, Janet H., and Jackson, Don D.. Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York: Norton, 1967.Google Scholar
Weeden, Theodore J. Mark: Traditions in Conflict. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar
White, Gareth. Audience Participation in Theatre: Aesthetics of the Invitation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Whitenton, Michael R. “Feeling the Silence: A Moment-by-Moment Account of Emotions at the End of Mark (16:1–8).” CBQ 78 (2016): 272–89.Google Scholar
Wilder, Thornton. “Some Thoughts on Playwriting,” Pages 83–98 in The Intent of the Artist. Edited by Centeno, August. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Williams, Catrin H. “How Scripture ‘Speaks’: Insights from the Study of Ancient Media Culture.” Pages 53–71 in Methodology in the Use of the Old Testament in the New: Context and Criteria. Edited by Allen, David and Smith, Steve. LNTS 597. London: Bloomsbury, 2020.Google Scholar
Williams, Joel F. Other Followers of Jesus: Minor Characters as Major Figures in Mark’s Gospel. JSNTSup 102. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Williams, Peter J. “An Examination of Ehrman’s Case for ὀργισθείς in Mark 1:41.” NovT 54 (2012): 1–12.Google Scholar
Winkler, Susanne. “Exploring Ambiguity and the Ambiguity Model from a Transdisciplinary Perspective.” Pages 1–25 in Ambiguity: Language and Communication. Edited by Winkler, Susanne. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar
Winsbury, Rex. The Roman Book. Edited by Taylor, David. Classical Literature and Society. London: Duckworth, 2009.Google Scholar
Wire, Antoinette Clark. The Case for Mark Composed in Performance. Biblical Performance Criticism 3. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2011.Google Scholar
Woodruff, Paul. “Sharing Emotions through Theater: The Greek Way.” Philosophy East and West 66 (2016): 146–51.Google Scholar
Wrede, William. Das Messiasgeheimnis in den Evangelien: Zugleich ein Beitrag zum Verständnis des Markusevangeliums. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1901.Google Scholar
Wright, Brian J. Communal Reading in the Time of Jesus: A Window into Early Christian Reading Practices. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2017.Google Scholar
Wright, Stephen I. Jesus the Storyteller. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2015.Google Scholar
Zadra, Jonathan R., and Clore, Gerald L.. “Emotion and Perception: The Role of Affective Information.” Cognitive Science (2011): 676–85.Google Scholar
Zumbach, Joerg, and Schwartz, Neil. “Hyperaudio Learning for Non-Linear Auditory Knowledge Acquisition.” Computers in Human Behavior 41 (2014): 365–73.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Kelly Iverson, Baylor University, Texas
  • Book: Performing Early Christian Literature
  • Online publication: 24 September 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009029209.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Kelly Iverson, Baylor University, Texas
  • Book: Performing Early Christian Literature
  • Online publication: 24 September 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009029209.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Kelly Iverson, Baylor University, Texas
  • Book: Performing Early Christian Literature
  • Online publication: 24 September 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009029209.008
Available formats
×