Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Section 1 Shoulder
- Section 2 Arm
- Section 3 Elbow
- Section 4 Forearm
- Section 5 Wrist
- Section 6 Hand
- Section 7 Hip and Pelvis
- Section 8 Thigh
- Section 9 Leg
- Section 10 Ankle
- Section 11 Foot
- Case 70 Master knot of Henry
- Case 71 Tarsal tunnel syndrome
- Case 72 Great toe sesamoids: osteonecrosis versus stress fracture
- Case 73 Lisfranc fracture/dislocation
- Case 74 Navicular stress fracture: importance of advanced imaging
- Section 12 Tumors/Miscellaneous
- Index
- References
Case 74 - Navicular stress fracture: importance of advanced imaging
from Section 11 - Foot
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Section 1 Shoulder
- Section 2 Arm
- Section 3 Elbow
- Section 4 Forearm
- Section 5 Wrist
- Section 6 Hand
- Section 7 Hip and Pelvis
- Section 8 Thigh
- Section 9 Leg
- Section 10 Ankle
- Section 11 Foot
- Case 70 Master knot of Henry
- Case 71 Tarsal tunnel syndrome
- Case 72 Great toe sesamoids: osteonecrosis versus stress fracture
- Case 73 Lisfranc fracture/dislocation
- Case 74 Navicular stress fracture: importance of advanced imaging
- Section 12 Tumors/Miscellaneous
- Index
- References
Summary
Imaging description
Navicular stress fractures are seen on AP radiographs of the foot, coronal CT images, or coronal MR images as a linear or curvilinear fracture line extending longitudinally in the sagittal plane (Figure 74.1). Stress reaction of the navicular can be seen as bone marrow-like edema within the navicular on MR images. When the fracture line is curvilinear it will typically curve laterally. Stress fractures of the navicular can also be complete or incomplete. When incomplete they will be proximal in location and usually involve the proximal articular surface of the navicular bone.
Importance
Navicular stress fractures typically occur in athletes and can be difficult to diagnose on clinical exam. A high degree of suspicion must be present. Given the difficulty in diagnosing this injury clinically, the average time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis is between four to seven months. Navicular stress fractures respond well when they are treated early; however, the delay in diagnosis that usually occurs can result in suboptimal treatment. Unfortunately, misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis resulting in inadequate treatment of these lesions can have disastrous consequences for the athlete.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pearls and Pitfalls in Musculoskeletal ImagingVariants and Other Difficult Diagnoses, pp. 161 - 162Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013