Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Section 1 Shoulder
- Section 2 Arm
- Section 3 Elbow
- Section 4 Forearm
- Section 5 Wrist
- Section 6 Hand
- Section 7 Hip and Pelvis
- Section 8 Thigh
- Section 9 Leg
- Section 10 Ankle
- Case 60 Posterior impingement
- Case 61 Haglund’s syndrome
- Case 62 Accessory anterolateral facet of the talus
- Case 63 Maisonneuve fracture
- Case 64 Triplane fracture
- Case 65 Peroneal tendon dislocation and calcaneal fractures
- Case 66 Anterior impingement
- Case 67 Peroneocalcaneus internus muscle: false flexor hallucis longus (FHL)
- Case 68 Accessory soleus muscle: a differential for posteromedial ankle mass
- Case 69 Xanthoma of the Achilles tendon
- Section 11 Foot
- Section 12 Tumors/Miscellaneous
- Index
- References
Case 63 - Maisonneuve fracture
from Section 10 - Ankle
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Section 1 Shoulder
- Section 2 Arm
- Section 3 Elbow
- Section 4 Forearm
- Section 5 Wrist
- Section 6 Hand
- Section 7 Hip and Pelvis
- Section 8 Thigh
- Section 9 Leg
- Section 10 Ankle
- Case 60 Posterior impingement
- Case 61 Haglund’s syndrome
- Case 62 Accessory anterolateral facet of the talus
- Case 63 Maisonneuve fracture
- Case 64 Triplane fracture
- Case 65 Peroneal tendon dislocation and calcaneal fractures
- Case 66 Anterior impingement
- Case 67 Peroneocalcaneus internus muscle: false flexor hallucis longus (FHL)
- Case 68 Accessory soleus muscle: a differential for posteromedial ankle mass
- Case 69 Xanthoma of the Achilles tendon
- Section 11 Foot
- Section 12 Tumors/Miscellaneous
- Index
- References
Summary
Imaging description
Maisonneuve fracture has been described for the ankle injury characterized by a high fibular fracture with disruption of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. The diagnosis of a Maisonneuve fracture should be considered in each of the following situations: (1) widening of the medial or lateral clear space without evident fracture (Figure 63.1); (2) an apparent isolated displaced fracture of the medial malleolus; and (3) an apparent isolated fracture of the posterior malleolus (Figure 63.2). On such occasions, full-length views of the tibia and fibula should be obtained to identify the high fibular fracture. Stress radiography of the ankle may help for subtle cases of medial clear space widening. Lack of overlap of the distal fibula with the tibial tuberosity is a helpful sign for syndesmotic injury.
Importance
Maisonneuve fracture is considered as a severe ankle injury with syndesmotic disruption. The diagnosis is often delayed or missed because the patients rarely report pain in the proximal fibula most likely due to the presence of a more painful ankle injury. Early operative treatment is recommended for the majority of patients with Maisonneuve fracture. Therefore, recognizing the injury pattern of Maisonneuve fracture from ankle radiographs is important for a correct diagnosis. Radiologists should recommend radiographic evaluation of the entire tibia and fibula to confirm the proximal extent of the injury.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pearls and Pitfalls in Musculoskeletal ImagingVariants and Other Difficult Diagnoses, pp. 135 - 137Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013