Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Section 1 Shoulder
- Section 2 Arm
- Section 3 Elbow
- Case 19 Pseudodefect of the capitellum versus osteochondral defect
- Case 20 Pseudodefect of the trochlear groove versus fracture
- Case 21 Transverse trochlear ridge versus osteophyte or post-traumatic deformity
- Case 22 FABS positioning on MRI: demonstration of distal biceps tear
- Case 23 Ulnar collateral ligament tear versus normal recess of the elbow
- Case 24 T-sign of undersurface partial tear of the ulnar collateral ligament
- Case 25 Lateral ulnar collateral ligament tears
- Case 26 Locations and evaluation of loose bodies in the elbow joint
- Case 27 Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow: stable versus unstable
- Case 28 Little Leaguer’s elbow: what is it?
- Section 4 Forearm
- Section 5 Wrist
- Section 6 Hand
- Section 7 Hip and Pelvis
- Section 8 Thigh
- Section 9 Leg
- Section 10 Ankle
- Section 11 Foot
- Section 12 Tumors/Miscellaneous
- Index
- References
Case 22 - FABS positioning on MRI: demonstration of distal biceps tear
from Section 3 - Elbow
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Section 1 Shoulder
- Section 2 Arm
- Section 3 Elbow
- Case 19 Pseudodefect of the capitellum versus osteochondral defect
- Case 20 Pseudodefect of the trochlear groove versus fracture
- Case 21 Transverse trochlear ridge versus osteophyte or post-traumatic deformity
- Case 22 FABS positioning on MRI: demonstration of distal biceps tear
- Case 23 Ulnar collateral ligament tear versus normal recess of the elbow
- Case 24 T-sign of undersurface partial tear of the ulnar collateral ligament
- Case 25 Lateral ulnar collateral ligament tears
- Case 26 Locations and evaluation of loose bodies in the elbow joint
- Case 27 Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow: stable versus unstable
- Case 28 Little Leaguer’s elbow: what is it?
- Section 4 Forearm
- Section 5 Wrist
- Section 6 Hand
- Section 7 Hip and Pelvis
- Section 8 Thigh
- Section 9 Leg
- Section 10 Ankle
- Section 11 Foot
- Section 12 Tumors/Miscellaneous
- Index
- References
Summary
Imaging description
The flexed abducted supinated (FABS) positioning of the elbow for MRI is the optimal positioning for best visualization of the distal biceps. This positioning nicely demonstrates the full length of the distal biceps brachii from the musculotendinous junction to the radial tuberosity on only one slice/image in the majority of patients (Figure 22.1). The patient can be positioned for these images by first abducting the shoulder to 180° with the arm by the patient’s head. Next, the elbow is flexed to 90° and the forearm is supinated to a thumb-up position with a coil placed around the elbow (Figure 22.2). In one study of 22 patients, this positioning demonstrated the full length of the distal biceps brachii on either one or two slices. This improves the visualization of both normal anatomy and pathology as this positioning moves the entire distal tendon and its attaching structures into a single plane instead of the tendon and its attaching structures being in multiple oblique planes.
Importance
Images obtained using the FABS positioning can aid the surgeon in their evaluation of the integrity (partial tear versus rupture) and the quality of the torn distal biceps tendon prior to surgical intervention (Figure 22.3).
Typical clinical scenario
The patient is usually a young to middle-aged adult male who sustained sudden, massive, eccentric contraction of the biceps (such as trying to catch a falling 250-pound rock) and felt sudden pain and a snap in the antecubital fossa region of the arm. MRI is typically ordered when the physical exam is equivocal for a complete rupture of the distal biceps or might be ordered for preoperative evaluation when the injury is subacute or chronic.
Teaching point
The FABS positioning is useful in demonstrating the full extent of the distal biceps brachii tendon from its musculotendinous junction to its insertion on only one or at most two sections. This improves the visualization of both normal anatomy and pathology.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pearls and Pitfalls in Musculoskeletal ImagingVariants and Other Difficult Diagnoses, pp. 43 - 44Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013