Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:01:34.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Reduction as Cognitive Strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

C. A. Hooker
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
Brian L. Keeley
Affiliation:
Pitzer College, Claremont
Get access

Summary

The name ‘Paul Churchland’ is synonymous in many minds with eliminative materialism, the view that a materialist theory of mind will triumph, not by showing how the mental ascriptions of common sense or folk psychology reduce to neurophysiological conditions, but simply by eliminating the former as a bad theory and substituting its own, different concepts, principles, and data in its place. This looks nothing like reduction, which precisely saves the succeeded within the successor. Yet Churchland understood it as a process akin to reduction. To understand why, his treatment of reduction must be set within his larger vision of cognition and cognitive strategy. In his enthusiasm for a science-led revolution in our reconception of our world, ourselves included, Churchland is pursuing an agenda inspired by early-Feyerabend and his (Churchland's) contribution to reduction theory lies primarily in what he consequently taught us about its place among our epistemological strategies rather than any specific internal technical detail.

Churchland is an unrestrained radical scientific naturalist (see note), pushing hard the consequences of understanding this world as a single whole, avoiding the imposition by intellectual fiat of both divisions and unities (e.g, imposing a priori either a mind/body dualism or monism) and accepting only what can be scientifically grounded. That Churchland was an enthusiastic and stylish presenter of it cannot detract from the good intellectual sense with which he explored it and argued its merits.

Type
Chapter
Information
Paul Churchland , pp. 154 - 174
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, D. M. (1968). A Materialist Theory of Mind. New York, Humanities PressGoogle Scholar
Ager, T. A. and Aronson, J. L. (1974). “Are bridge laws really necessary.” NoÛs 8: 119–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batterman, R. W. (2002). The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction and Emergence, Boston, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Beckermann, A. (1992). “Supervenience, emergence and reduction.” In Beckermann, A. (ed.), Emergence or Reduction?Berlin, De GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (1993). “Representational Content in Humans and Machines.” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5: 285–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickle, J. (1998). Psychoneural reduction: The New Wave. Boston, MIT/BradfordGoogle Scholar
Bickle, J. (2003). Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. Boston, KluwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. I. (1979). Perception, theory and commitment: the new philosophy of science. Chicago, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. I. (1988). Rationality. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Causey, R. L. (1977). Unity of Science. Dordrecht, ReidelCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W. D. and Hooker, C. A. (1998). ‘The dynamics of reason, critical symposium on Paul Churchland: The Engine of Reason, the Seat of the Soul.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research ⅬVIII (4): 871–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W. D. and Hooker, C. A. (1999). “An interactivist-constructivist approach to intelligence: self-directed anticipative learning.” Philosophical Psychology 13: 5–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W. D. and C. A. Hooker (2000). “Organised interactive construction: the nature of autonomy and the emergence of intelligence.” In Etxeberria, A., Moreno, A., and Umerez, J. (eds.), Communication & Cognition 17, Special Edition: The Contribution of Artificial Life and the Sciences of Complexity to the Understanding of Autonomous Systems, 133–58Google Scholar
Christensen, W. D. and Hooker, C. A. (2001). “Self-directed agents.” In MacIntosh, J. S. (ed.) Naturalism, Evolution and Intentionality, Ottawa: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27: 19–52Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1975). “Two grades of evidential bias.” Philosophy of Science 42: 250–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1985a). “Conceptual progress and word/world relations: in search of the essence of natural kinds.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15: 1–18. Reprinted in Churchland 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1985b). “Reduction, qualia, and the direct introspection of brain states.” Journal of Philosophy 82: 1–22. Reprinted in Churchland 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective. Cambridge, MA, Bradford/MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1995). The engine of reason, the seat of the soul: A philosophical journey into the brain. Cambridge, MA, Bradford/MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. and Hooker, C. A. (eds.) (1985). Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, Chicago, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Collier, J. D. and Hooker, C. A. (1999). “Complexly Organised Dynamical Systems.” Open Systems & Information Dynamics 36: 1–62Google Scholar
Farrell, R. (2003). Feyerabend and Scientific Values: Tightrope–Walking Rationality. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Boston: Kluwer, 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1961). “Knowledge without foundations.” Oberlin College (mimeographed)
Feyerabend, P. K. (1962). “Explanation, reduction and empiricism.” In Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. III: Minneapolis, University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1970). “Against method.” In Radner, M. and Winokur, S. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, IV: Minneapolis, University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1987). Farewell to reason. London, VersoGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1974). “Systematic realism.” Synthese 26: 409–97, reprinted in Hooker 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1975). “The philosophical ramifications of the information-processing approach to the brain-mind.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1979). “Critical notice of R. Yoshida, Reduction in the physical sciences.” Dialogue XVIII: 81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1981). “Towards a general theory of reduction.” Dialogue XX (Part I, Historical framework, pp. 38–59, Part II, Identity and reduction, pp. 201–36, Part III, Cross-categorial reduction, pp. 496–529)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1987). A realistic theory of science. Albany, State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1991). “Between formalism and anarchism: a reasonable middle way.” In Munevar, G. (ed.) Beyond reason: essays on the philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. Boston, KluwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1995). Reason, regulation and realism, Albany: SUNY PressGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1996). “Toward a Naturalised Cognitive Science.” In Kitchener, R. and Donohue, W. O' (eds.), Psychology and Philosophy. London, Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1997). “Unity of Science.” In Newton-Smith, W. H. (ed.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford, BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (2004). “Asymptotics, reduction and emergence.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 435–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. (1998). Mind in a physical world: an essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. Boston, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. (1999). “Making sense of emergence.” Philosophical Studies 95: 3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marras, A. (2002). “Kim on reduction.” Erkenntnis 57: 231–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, A. and Ruiz-Mirazo, K. (1999). “Metabolism and the problem of its universalisation.” Biosystems 49: 45–61Google Scholar
Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. New York, Harcourt, Brace and WorldGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (1967). “Approaches to reduction.” Philosophy of Science 34: 137–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (1992). “Philosophy of medicine.” In Salmon, M.. (1992). Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Sellars, W. (1962). “Philosophy and the scientific image of man.” In Colodny, R. (ed.) Frontiers of Science and Philosophy. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh PressGoogle Scholar
Sellars, W. (1965). “The identity approach to the mind body problem.” In Cohen, R. and Wartofsky, M., Boston Studies in the Philosophy of ScienceII, New York, Humanities PressGoogle Scholar
Sklar, L. (1967). “Types of inter-theoretic reduction.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18: 109–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklar, L. (1993). Physics and Chance. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, R. (1977). Reduction in the physical sciences. Halifax, N.S. Dalhousie University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×