Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:25:41.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - THE POVERTY CONTROVERSY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2009

Takashi Shogimen
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

Ockham's first polemical work does not owe its title to the author. It is today called the Opus nonaginta dierum (The Work of Ninety Days), since it was probably written within three months in the period between February 1332 and the beginning of 1333. The work was devoted to the refutation of John XXII's decree Quia vir reprobus (1329). The Opus nonaginta dierum emerged from the bitter battle of words over apostolic poverty.

This work, however, had long failed to attract modern scholarly attention beyond the circles of medieval ecclesiastical historians until Jürgen Miethke highlighted in the work all the seminal ideas of Ockham's later ecclesiology. It is now widely recognised that the Opus nonaginta dierum presents Ockham's ideas on natural law and natural right. This should not lead us to think that the Opus nonaginta dierum is a systematic treatise on legal theory. It cites the papal bull and presents the opinions of the anti-papal ‘attackers (impugnantes)’ in an ‘impersonal’ format, responding to the whole papal bull, sentence by sentence, phrase by phrase, and even word by word. The Opus nonaginta dierum was clearly not written as a system of ecclesiological or legal theory but as a series of responses to the issues raised by the pope.

What did Ockham intend in writing the Opus nonaginta dierum? The circumstances appear to show that he was simply defending the Franciscan case.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • THE POVERTY CONTROVERSY
  • Takashi Shogimen, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Book: Ockham and Political Discourse in the Late Middle Ages
  • Online publication: 23 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497223.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • THE POVERTY CONTROVERSY
  • Takashi Shogimen, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Book: Ockham and Political Discourse in the Late Middle Ages
  • Online publication: 23 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497223.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • THE POVERTY CONTROVERSY
  • Takashi Shogimen, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Book: Ockham and Political Discourse in the Late Middle Ages
  • Online publication: 23 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497223.003
Available formats
×