Foreword

Summary

The comparative approach is one of the most useful in the intellectual toolkit of the historian. It enables the scholar to determine what is distinctive and what is commonplace about the country he or she is primarily interested in studying. It encourages an analytical rather than a descriptive discourse as questions, paradoxes, problems and puzzles arise which would otherwise remain hidden or dormant without such a broader context of investigation. The pitfalls of exceptionalism, introspection, parochialism and navel-gazing in national histories can be avoided to some extent at least. Invaluable also is the fact that some features which domestic historians take for granted can often immediately seem striking and intriguing to the outsider.

The historiography of modern Scotland has already benefited significantly from the approach. In the final three decades of the last century a series of conferences, followed by publication of their proceedings, was organised to explore the comparative historical development of Ireland and Scotland. At the heart of the discussions was a central issue. Around 1700 the social, economic, resource and demographic contours of both countries seemed probably similar. Indeed, there was some evidence that Ireland showed more promise of material progress than Scotland. Instead, however, Scotland experienced rapid industrialisation from the middle decades of the eighteenth century and eventually a position of global economic hegemony while Ireland's tragic fate culminated in the horrors of the Great Famine, the most terrible human catastrophe in nineteenth-century Europe. Scholars on both sides of the Irish Sea learned much about the causes and nature of the development paths of the two societies until the project finally came to an end more than a decade or so ago.

Now in this important book we can read another exciting attempt to examine through the comparative lens the modern histories of Norway and Scotland. A team of interdisciplinary experts drawn from both countries and elsewhere in the UK have been assembled to consider the radically different historical paths of two small nations and the social, political and economic consequences from c. 1800 to the present day.