Book contents
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Conceptual Disputes
- Part II Epistemic Disputes
- 6 Lying, Deception, and fMRI: A Critical Update
- 7 Brain-Based Lie Detection and the Mereological Fallacy: Reasons for Optimism
- 8 Is Brain Reading Mind Reading?
- Part III Implications for Courts and Defendants
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
7 - Brain-Based Lie Detection and the Mereological Fallacy: Reasons for Optimism
from Part II - Epistemic Disputes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2018
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Conceptual Disputes
- Part II Epistemic Disputes
- 6 Lying, Deception, and fMRI: A Critical Update
- 7 Brain-Based Lie Detection and the Mereological Fallacy: Reasons for Optimism
- 8 Is Brain Reading Mind Reading?
- Part III Implications for Courts and Defendants
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for ActionConcepts, Crimes, and Courts, pp. 160 - 181Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018