Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:04:01.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Redefining ethnic and linguistic boundaries in Ukraine: indigenes, settlers and Russophone Ukrainians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Graham Smith
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Vivien Law
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Andrew Wilson
Affiliation:
University of London
Annette Bohr
Affiliation:
Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge
Edward Allworth
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

This chapter focuses on the politics of symbolic and cultural representation between (and within) three key groups of roughly equal size in Ukraine: Ukrainophone Ukrainians, Russophone Ukrainians and ethnic Russians. The threefold division is a simplification, but a useful one. It helps to explain why the titular nationality in Ukraine is divided within itself and has been unable to impose a nationalising agenda in the manner of Estonia and Latvia, or even some of the Central Asian states. It also helps to shift analysis away from ethnicity as the sole factor of importance in Ukrainian society and to focus attention on Russophone Ukrainians as a vital swing group. On the other hand, this chapter also seeks to deconstruct such categories by analysing the three groups as social constructs. It is not argued that they have immutable essences and boundaries.

According to Soviet census methodology (there has been no national census in Ukraine since independence in 1991; the first is scheduled for 1999), 64 per cent of the population of Ukraine in 1989 were classed as ‘native tongue’ Ukrainians, 9 per cent as ethnic Ukrainians who identified Russian as their ‘native tongue’ and 22 per cent were ‘Russian’ in terms of both ethnicity and language. The use of the term ‘native tongue’ in Soviet censuses (ridna mova in Ukrainian, rodnoi iazyk in Russian), however, was highly ambiguous. It tended to be interpreted in ancestral terms and therefore overlapped with ethnicity to an exaggerated extent.

Type
Chapter
Information
Nation-building in the Post-Soviet Borderlands
The Politics of National Identities
, pp. 119 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×