Bibliography

doi:10.1017/9781108854306.019

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 December 2021

Edited by

Anselmo Reyes and

Weixia Gu

Show author details

Anselmo Reyes: Affiliation:
Singapore International Commercial Court and Doshisha University, Kyoto
Weixia Gu: Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Multi-Tier Approaches to the Resolution of International Disputes
A Global and Comparative Study
, pp. 443 - 475

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108854306.019 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

‘10 Reasons to Mediate’ (US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) <www.eeoc.gov/10-reasons-mediate> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘2011 Population Census’ (Census and Statistics Department, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 25 February 2020) <www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/so170.jsp> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘2019 Annual Report’ (Financial Ombudsman Institution 2020) <www.foi.org.tw/Article.aspx?Lang=2&Arti=1358&Role=1> accessed 20 September 2020+accessed+20+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘2019 ICC Dispute Resolution Statistics’ (International Chamber of Commerce) <https://iccwbo.org/publication/icc-dispute-resolution-statistics> accessed 24 February 2021+accessed+24+February+2021>Google Scholar

‘2019 Statistics’ (Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre) <www.hkiac.org/about-us/statistics> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

‘About the Office of Human Rights Proceedings’ (Office of Human Rights Proceedings) <www.hrc.co.nz/ohrp/about/> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘About Us’ (Chinese Arbitration Association, Taipei) <http://en.arbitration.org.tw/about.aspx> accessed 23 September 2020+accessed+23+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘ADR xunxi gonggao’ [ADR Bulletin] (Judicial Yuan) <www.judicial.gov.tw/tw/lp-1493–1.html> accessed 23 September 2020+accessed+23+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘ADRIC Arbitration Rules’ (ADR Institute of Canada) <https://adric.ca/rules-codes/arbrules> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘ADRIC Med-Arb Rules’ (ADR Institute of Canada) <https://adric.ca/rules-codes/adric-med-arb-rules> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Alberta Provincial Court Civil Claims Mediation’ (Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, 24 October 2013) <https://cfcj-fcjc.org/inventory-of-reforms/alberta-provincial-court-civil-claims-mediation/> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Alphabetical Index of the Political Entities and Corresponding Legal Systems’ (University of Ottawa) <www.juriglobe.ca/eng/sys-juri/index-alpha.php> accessed 14 August 2020+accessed+14+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘APEC’s Collaborative Framework for Online Dispute Resolution of Cross-Border Business-to-Business Disputes – Endorsed’ (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) <http://mddb.apec.org/Documents/2019/EC/EC2/19_ec2_022.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Arrangement between the Mainland and the Macau Special Administrative Region on Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitration Awards’ (Região Administrativa Especial De Macau Gabinete Do Chefe Do Executivo) <https://bo.io.gov.mo/bo/ii/2007/50/aviso22_cn.asp> accessed 24 February 2021+accessed+24+February+2021>Google Scholar

‘Arrangement Concerning Mutual Enforcement of Arbitral Awards between the Mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region’ <www.doj.gov.hk/eng/topical/pdf/mainlandmutual2e.pdf> accessed 1 March 2020+accessed+1+March+2020>Google Scholar

‘Belt and Road Portal’ <https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

‘Chusaiho to no Kaisei ni Kansuru Chukan Shian’ [Interim Draft Report on Reform of the Arbitration Act etc] <www.moj.go.jp/> accessed 17 May 2021+accessed+17+May+2021>Google Scholar

‘Commercial Arbitration Rules (2019)’ (Japan Commercial Arbitration Association) <www.jcaa.or.jp/en/arbitration/rules.html> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

‘Commercial Mediation Rules (2020)’ (Japan Commercial Arbitration Association) <www.jcaa.or.jp/en/arbitration/rules.html> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

‘Commission Guidelines for the Exercise of the Amicus Curiae Function under the Australian Human Rights Commission Act (Australia Human Rights Commission, 18 September 2009) <https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/legal/amicus-guidelines> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Complaints about Banks’ (Hong Kong Monetary Authority, 28 August 2020) <www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/key-functions/banking-stability/complaints-about-banks.shtml> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘COVID-19 and Duties of Good Faith under English Law’ (Dechert, 25 June 2020) <www.dechert.com/knowledge/onpoint/2020/6/covid-19-and-duties-of-good-faith-under-english-law.html> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

‘Dazao guoji shangshi faying sifa baozhang “yidaiyilu” jianshe’ [Creating the International Commercial Court, Legal Protection for the Belt and Road Construction] (China International Commercial Court, 19 March 2018) <http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/218/149/156/571.html> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Directive 2013/11/EU (Directive on Consumer ADR) – Issues Emerging from the Meetings of the ADR Expert Group’ <http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetailDoc&id=18896&no=3> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Discrimination: Your Rights’ (gov.uk) <www.gov.uk/discrimination-your-rights/what-you-can-do> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Dispute Resolution Process’ (Financial Dispute Resolution Centre) <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/html/resolvingdisputes/resolvingdisputes_fdrsprocess.php> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Domestic Commercial Arbitration Rules of Procedure’ (British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Centre) <https://vaniac.org/arbitration/rules-of-procedure/previous-domestic-commercial-arbitration-rules-of-procedure/> accessed 9 October 2020+accessed+9+October+2020>Google Scholar

‘Domestic Commercial Arbitration Rules of Procedure’ (Vancouver International Arbitration Centre) <https://vaniac.org/arbitration/rules-of-procedure/domestic-arbitration-rules/> accessed 9 October 2020+accessed+9+October+2020>Google Scholar

‘Expert Directory’ (China International Commercial Court) <http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/219/235/237/index.html> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

‘Explanatory Notes to Section 64 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013’ <www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/24/notes/division/5/4/3/1> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘FDRC Annual Report’ (Financial Dispute Resolution Centre) <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/html/publications/annualreport.php> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Fees’ (Financial Dispute Resolution Centre) <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/html/resolvingdisputes/resolvingdisputes_scheduleoffees.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Final Communique of the 45th Session of the Council of Ministers of OHADA’ (OHADA.com, 25 November 2017) <www.ohada.com/actualite/3856/communique-final-de-la-45e-session-du-conseil-des-ministres-de-l-ohada.html> accessed 18 October 2018+accessed+18+October+2018>Google Scholar

‘Financial Dispute Resolution Scheme (FDRS)’ (Financial Dispute Resolution Centre) <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/html/aboutus/aboutus_fdrs.php> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Frequently Asked Questions’ (Office of Human Rights Proceedings) <www.hrc.co.nz/ohrp/faqs/> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘General Contract Clauses: Alternative Dispute Resolution (Multi-tiered)’ (Thomson Reuters Practical Law Commercial Transactions) <https://content.next.westlaw.com/9-555-5330> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Guanyu jianli “yidaiyilu” zhengduan jiejue jizhi he jigou de yijian’ [Opinion on Constructing ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ Dispute Resolution Mechanism and Institutions] [2018] Zhong Ban Fa 19 <www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-06/27/content_5301657.htm> accessed 17 August 2020.+accessed+17+August+2020.>Google Scholar

‘Guidance on Responsible Contractual Behaviour in the Performance and Enforcement of Contracts Impacted by the COVID-19 Emergency (Published 7 May 2020): Update, 30 June 2020’ (30 June 2020) <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/899175/__Update_-_Covid-19_and_Responsible_Contractual_Behaviour_-_30_June__final_for_web_.pdf> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

‘Guide to Judiciary Policy’ (United States Courts) <www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/vol02a-ch02_0.pdf> accessed 20 August 2018+accessed+20+August+2018>Google Scholar

‘Home’ (Center for Effective Dispute Resolution) <www.cedr.com> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

‘Home’ (Chinese Arbitration Association, Taipei) <http://en.arbitration.org.tw> accessed 11 September 2020+accessed+11+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Home’ (Japan Association of Arbitrators) <https://arbitrators.jp/> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

‘Home’ (Japan Commercial Arbitration Association) <www.jcaa.or.jp/en/> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

‘Home’ (Japan International Dispute Resolution Centre) <https://idrc.jp/en> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

‘Home’ (Japan International Mediation Center) <www.jimc-kyoto.jp/> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

‘Home’ (London Chamber of Arbitration and Mediation) <https://lcam.org.uk> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

‘Home’ (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) <https://uncitral.un.org> accessed 17 May 2021+accessed+17+May+2021>Google Scholar

‘Huanan guozhong tiaojie zhongxin jieshao’ [Introduction to the SCIA Mediation Centre] (Yicaiwang, 10 July 2014) <//www.cnarb.com/Item/1245.aspx> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Information for Advocates and Lawyers Participating in Conciliation’ (Australian Human Rights Commission) <www.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/conciliation_-_information_for_advocates_lawyers_-_april_2017.pdf> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘International Commercial Arbitration Rules of Procedure’ (Vancouver International Arbitration Centre) <https://vaniac.org/arbitration/rules-of-procedure/international-commercial-arbitration-rules-of-procedure/> accessed 9 October 2020+accessed+9+October+2020>Google Scholar

‘Intervention in Court Proceedings: The Australian Human Rights Commission Guidelines’ (Australia Human Rights Commission, 18 September 2009) <https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/legal/intervention-court-proceedings-australian-human-rights-commission-guidelines> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Investment Agreement under the Framework of the Mainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement Mediation Rules for Investment Disputes’ <www.tid.gov.hk/english/cepa/investment/files/HKMediationRule.pdf> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

‘Item for Financial Committee’ (Legislative Council) <www.legco.gov.hk/yr10-11/english/fc/fc/papers/f11-23e.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘LCQ20: Mediation Service’ (info.gov.hk, 23 February 2011) <www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201102/23/P201102220246.htm> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘LCQ5 Annex’ (info.gov.hk, 10 June 2020) <https://gia.info.gov.hk/general/202006/10/P2020061000538_343171_1_1591784369710.pdf> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘List of Mediators of Hong Kong Mediation Council’ <www.tid.gov.hk/english/cepa/investment/files/mediators_hkiac.pdf> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

‘Mainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA)’ (Trade and Industry Department of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region) <www.tid.gov.hk/english/cepa/investment/mediation.html> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

‘Mandatory Claim Dispute Resolution Procedure (by Goltsblat BLP)’ (SPS ‘Konsul’tantPlyus’ – Consultant Plus Reference Legal System)Google Scholar

‘Mediation Figures and Statistics’ (Hong Kong Judiciary) <http://mediation.judiciary/hk/en/figures_and_statistics.html> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Notice of the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council on Issuing the “Opinions Concerning Establishing BRI’s International Commercial Dispute Resolution Mechanisms and Bodies”’ (People’s Republic of China Central Government, 27 June 2018) <www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018–06/27/content_5301657.htm> accessed 25 August 2020+accessed+25+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Opposing the Enforcement of PRC Arbitral Award on Public Policy Ground? Not as Easy as You Think!’ (ONC Lawyers) <www.onc.hk/en_US/opposing-the-enforcement-of-prc-arbitral-award-on-public-policy-ground-not-as-easy-as-you-think/> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘PRIME Finance’ (Norton Rose Fulbright) <www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/11ad2a93/prime-finance> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Principles, Criteria, Protocol and Competencies Required for the Designation Chartered Mediator-Arbitrator (C. Med-Arb)’ (ADR Institute of Canada) <https://adric.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ADRIC_CMed-ARB_Criteria-1.pdf> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Public Information Notice – Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program’ (Government of Ontario, Ministry of the Attorney General, 9 September 2019) <www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/courts/manmed/notice.php> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Publicação do Acordo sobre a Confirmação e Execução Recíprocas de Decisões Arbitrais entre o Interior da China e a Região Administrativa Especial de Macau’ (Região Administrativa Especial De Macau Gabinete Do Chefe Do Executivo) <https://bo.io.gov.mo/bo/ii/2007/50/aviso22.asp> accessed 1 March 2020+accessed+1+March+2020>Google Scholar

‘Questions and Answers – 2020 ADR Pilot’ (US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) <www.eeoc.gov/questions-and-answers-2020-adr-pilot> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Questions and Answers Universal Agreements to Mediate (UAMS)’ (US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) <www.eeoc.gov/questions-and-answers-universal-agreements-mediate-uams> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Reglement d’Arbitrage, de Mediation et de Conciliation du Centre d’Arbitrage de la CCIAD’ [The Arbitration, Mediation, and Conciliation Rules of the CCIAD] <https://docplayer.fr/66350819-Reglement-d-arbitrage-de-mediation-et-de-conciliation-du-centre-d-arbitrage-de-la-cciad.html> accessed 2 April 2021+accessed+2+April+2021>Google Scholar

‘Report of the Working Group on the Uniform Act on International Commercial Mediation’ (2005)Google Scholar

‘Rules on the Efficient Conduct of Proceedings in International Arbitration (Prague Rules)’ (Prague Rules 2018) <https://praguerules.com/prague_rules/> accessed 1 March 2020+accessed+1+March+2020>Google Scholar

‘Scope’ (Financial Dispute Resolution Centre) <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/html/resolvingdisputes/resolvingdisputes_jurisdiction.php> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Shenxuhui xiangguan tongji ziliao’ [Relevant Statistical Information of the Complaints Commission] (Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan) <www.pcc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=F34923ABE419ADE0> accessed 20 September 2020+accessed+20+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Statistics’ (China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission) <http://cietac.org/index.php?m=Page&a=index&id=40&l=en> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Status: United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation’ (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) <https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXII-4&chapter=22&clang=_en> accessed 23 September 2020+accessed+23+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Submission to Court as Intervener and Amicus Curiae’ (Australia Human Rights Commission) <https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/legal/submissions/submission-court-intervener-and-amicus-curiae> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Terms of Reference’ (Financial Dispute Resolution Centre) <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/html/aboutus/aboutus_tor.php> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘The Arbitration Rules of Procedure of the CACI’ (Court of Arbitration of Côte d’Ivoire (CACI)) <www.courarbitrage.ci/download/2/reglements/840/Arbitrage.pdf> accessed 11 October 2018+accessed+11+October+2018>Google Scholar

‘The Court of Appeal: Judicial Mediation Program’ (The Courts of Nova Scotia) <https://courts.ns.ca/Appeal_Court/NSCA_mediation_program.htm> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘The Mediation Rules of Procedure of the CACI’ (Court of Arbitration of Côte d’Ivoire (CACI)) <www.courarbitrage.ci/download/47/reglements/838/Reglement%20Mediation%20CACI.pdf> accessed 11 October 2018+accessed+11+October+2018>Google Scholar

‘The Rules of Arbitration of the CAC’ (Centre d’Arbitrage du Congo) <http://cac-rdc.org/reglement-darbitrage/> accessed 12 October 2018+accessed+12+October+2018>Google Scholar

‘The Rules of Arbitration of the GICAM’ (Groupement Inter-Patronal du Cameroun) <www.legicam.cm/media/upload/2019049/reglement-darbitrage-cmag-1.pdf> accessed 2 April 2021+accessed+2+April+2021>Google Scholar

‘Uniform Mediation Act’ (National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws) <www.uniformlaws.org/shared/docs/mediation/uma_final_03.pdf> accessed 20 August 2018+accessed+20+August+2018>Google Scholar

‘United States: EEOC Expands Voluntary Resolution Efforts with Temporary Mediation and Conciliation Pilot Programs’ (Mondaq.com, 5 August 2020) <www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/employee-rights-labour-relations/972302/eeoc-expands-voluntary-resolution-efforts-with-temporary-mediation-and-conciliation-pilot-programs> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road’ (Belt and Road Initiative – Hong Kong) <www.beltandroad.gov.hk/visionandactions.html> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

‘What You Can Expect after a Charge Is Filed’ (US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) <www.eeoc.gov/employers/what-you-can-expect-after-charge-filed> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

‘Zuigao fayuan guoji shangshi fating yi shouli yipi guoji shangshi jiufen anjian’ [The China International Commercial Court of the Supreme People’s Court Have Accepted to Hear a Batch of Cases on International Commercial Disputes] (China International Commercial Court, 29 December 2018) <http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/218/149/192/1150.html> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

Abarchi, D, ‘La Supranationalité OHADA’ (2000) 37 Revue burkinabé de droit 7Google Scholar

Abramson, HI, ‘Protocols for International Arbitrators Who Dare to Settle Cases’ (1999) 10 American Review of International Arbitration 1Google Scholar

ADR Institute of Alberta Mediation Advocacy Task Force, ‘White Paper 2016’ (ADR Institute of Alberta, 15 March 2016) <https://adralberta.com/resources/Documents/White%20Paper%202016/WP%20May%2010,%202016.pdf> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Alberta Law Reform Institute, ‘Uniform International Commercial Arbitration, Final Report 114’ (6 March 2019)<www.alri.ualberta.ca/2019/03/uniform-international-commercial-arbitration-final-report-114/> accessed 14 August 2020+accessed+14+August+2020>Google Scholar

Alexander, N, ‘The Mediation Metamodel: Understanding Practice’ (2008) 26 Conflict Resolution Quarterly 97Google Scholar

Alexander, N, International and Comparative Mediation: Legal Perspectives (Wolters Kluwer 2009)Google Scholar

Alexander, N, ‘The Mediation Meta-model: The Realities of Mediation Practice’ (2011) 12(6) ADR Bulletin: The Monthly Newsletter on Dispute Resolution 126Google Scholar

Alexander, N and Chong, Shouyu (eds), The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Commentary (Global Trends in Dispute Resolution, vol 8) (Kluwer Law International 2019)Google Scholar

Alfini, JJ, ‘Evaluative versus Facilitative Mediation: A Discussion’ (1996) 24 Florida State University Law Review 919Google Scholar

Ali, S, ‘International Arbitration and Mediation in East Asia: Examining the Role of Domestic Legal Culture and Globalization on Shaping East Asian Arbitration’ (PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley 2007)Google Scholar

Ali, SF and Da Roza, A, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution Design in Financial Markets – Some More Equal Than Others: Hong Kong’s Proposed Financial Dispute Resolution Center in the Context of the Experience in the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, and Singapore’ (2012) 21(3) Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 486Google Scholar

Ali, SF and Da Roza, A and Kwok, JKW, ‘After Lehman: International Response to Financial Disputes – A Focus on Hong Kong’ (2009) 152 Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business 102Google Scholar

Allemeersch, B, ‘Een geactualiseerde inleiding tot de bemiddelingswet’ in Van Ransbeeck, R (ed), Bemiddeling (Die Keure 2008)Google Scholar

Allen, D, ‘Strategic Enforcement of Anti-discrimination Law: A New Role for Australia’s Equality Commissions’ (2010) 36(3) Monash University Law Review 103Google Scholar

American Arbitration Association, Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures <www.adr.org/sites/default/files/CommercialRules_Web.pdf> accessed 29 August 2020+accessed+29+August+2020>Google Scholar

American Arbitration Association, Drafting Dispute Resolution Clauses: A Practical Guide <www.adr.org/sites/default/files/document_repository/Drafting%20Dispute%20Resolution%20Clauses%20A%20Practical%20Guide.pdf> accessed 29 August 2020+accessed+29+August+2020>Google Scholar

Angyal, R, ‘Med-arb – Past, Present and Future’ <www.bar.asn.au> accessed 16 August 2020+accessed+16+August+2020>Google Scholar

Antaki, NN, ‘Muslims’ and Arabs’ Practice of ADR’ [2009] 2 NYSBA New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer 113Google Scholar

Australian Human Rights Commission, ‘Federal Discrimination Law’ (Australian Human Rights Commission 2016) <https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/document/publication/AHRC_Federal%20Discrimination%20Law_2016.pdf> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

Bamba, A, ‘La procédure d’arbitrage devant la Cour Commune de Justice et d’Arbitrage’ (2000) Revue Penant numéro spécial no 833Google Scholar

Bang, JP, ‘South Korea’ in Acomb, FA and others (eds), Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses (IBA Litigation Committee 2015)Google Scholar

Bang, JP , Yu, JJ and Umaer, K, ‘The Current State of ADR in Korea’ (2017) 72 Dispute Resolution Journal 27Google Scholar

Barsky, A, ‘“Med-arb”: Behind the Closed Doors of a Hybrid Process’ (2013) 51 Family Court Review 637Google Scholar

Baum, H, ‘Mediation in Japan: Development, Forms, Regulation and Practice of Out-of-Court Dispute Resolution’ in Hopt, KJ and Steffek, F (eds), Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Beijing Arbitration Commission, ‘Beijing Arbitration Commission Arbitration Rules’ (2015) <http://bjac.org.cn/english/page/ckzl/sz2015.html> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

Benzidi, S, ‘Med-arb: How to Mitigate the Risk of Setting Aside or Refusal of Recognition and Enforcement of a Med-arb Award’ (2017) 10 American Journal of Mediation 1Google Scholar

Berger, KP, ‘Integration of Mediation Elements into Arbitration: “Hybrid” Procedures and “Intuitive” Mediation by International Arbitrators’ (2003) 19 Arbitration International 387Google Scholar

Berger, KP ‘Law and Practice of Escalation Clauses’ (2006) 22 Arbitration International 1Google Scholar

Berger, KP Private Dispute Resolution in International Business (Wolters Kluwer 2006)Google Scholar

Bergin, PA, ‘Mediation in Hong Kong: The Way Forward: Perspectives from Australia’, paper delivered at the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, 30 November 2007) <www.supremecourt.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Publications/Speeches/Pre-2015%20Speeches/Bergin/bergin301107.pdf> accessed 1 October 2020+accessed+1+October+2020>Google Scholar

Bienvenu, P and Valasek, M, ‘Canada: Arbitration Guide: IBA Arbitration Committee’ (International Bar Association 2018) <www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=5A3BA1C8-73A9-4EBD-A160-69D43D25A8FA> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Bingham, LB, ‘Mandatory Arbitration: Control Over Dispute-System Design and Mandatory Commercial Arbitration’ [2004] Law & Contemporary Problems 221Google Scholar

Blair, W, Lein, E, Gullifer, L and Fu, J, ‘Breathing Space, Concept Note 2 on the Effect of the 2020 Pandemic on Commercial Contracts, September 2020 Update’ (British Institute of International and Comparative Law) <www.biicl.org/breathing-space> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

Blanke, G, ‘The Mediation Directive: What Will It Mean for Us?’ (2008) 74 Arbitration 441Google Scholar

Blankley, KM, ‘Keeping a Secret from Yourself? Confidentiality When the Same Neutral Serves Both as Mediator and as Arbitrator in the Same Case’ (2011) 63 Baylor Law Review 317Google Scholar

Bogdan, M, ‘The New EU Regulation on Online Resolution for Consumer Disputes’ (2015) 9 Masaryk University Journal of Law & Technology 155CrossRef Google Scholar

Boog, C, ‘The New SIAC/SIMC AMA-Protocol: A Seamless Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Process Tailored to the User’s Needs’ (Singapore International Mediation Centre, 14 April 2015) <http://simc.com.sg/the-new-siacsimc-ama-protocol-a-seamless-multi-tiered-dispute-resolution-process-tailored-to-the-users-needs/> accessed 25 October 2018+accessed+25+October+2018>Google Scholar

Born, G, International Commercial Arbitration (2nd edn, Wolters Kluwer 2014)Google Scholar

Born, G and Šćekić, M, ‘Pre-arbitration Procedural Requirements: “A Dismal Swamp”’ in Caron, DD and others (eds), Practising Virtue: Inside International Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2015)Google Scholar

Bourdin, R, ‘Le Règlement d’arbitrage de la Cour Commune de Justice et d’Arbitrage’ (1999) 5 Revue Camerounaise de l’Arbitrage 10Google Scholar

Brazil, WD, ‘Judicial Mediation of Cases Assigned to the Judge for Trial’ (2011) 17 Dispute Resolution Magazine 24Google Scholar

Bridge, C, ‘Med-arb and Other Hybrid Processes: One Man’s Meat Is Another Man’s Poison’ (2014) 1(4) Australian Alternative Dispute Resolution Law Bulletin 76Google Scholar

Brown, HJ and Marriot, AL, ADR Principles and Practice (2nd edn, Sweet & Maxwell 1999)Google Scholar

Bühring-Uhle, C, Kirchhoff, L and Scherer, G, Arbitration and Mediation in International Business (2nd edn, Kluwer Law International 2006)Google Scholar

Bush, RAB, ‘Handling Workplace Conflict: Why Transformative Mediation’ (2001) 18 Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal 367Google Scholar

Bush, RAB and Folger, JP, Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict (Jossey-Bass 2004)Google Scholar

Cabinet Office, ‘Guidance on Responsible Contractual Behaviour in the Performance and Enforcement of Contracts Impacted by the COVID-19 Emergency’ (7 May 2020) <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/883737/_Covid-19_and_Responsible_Contractual_Behaviour__web_final___7_May_.pdf> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

Cabinet Office ‘Guidance on Responsible Contractual Behaviour in the Performance and Enforcement of Contracts Impacted by the COVID-19 Emergency (published 7 May 2020): Update, 30 June 2020’ (30 June 2020) <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/899175/__Update_-_Covid-19_and_Responsible_Contractual_Behaviour_-_30_June__final_for_web_.pdf> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

Cairns, DJA, ‘Mediating International Commercial Disputes: Differences in US and European Approaches’ (2005) 60 Dispute Resolution Journal 3Google Scholar

Campbell, D, ‘International Dispute Resolution’ (2010) 31A Comparative Law Yearbook of International Business 59Google Scholar

Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, ‘Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program (Rules 24.1 and 75.1)’ (Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, 21 November 2013) <https://cfcj-fcjc.org/inventory-of-reforms/ontario-mandatory-mediation-program-rules-24-1-and-75-1> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Carducci, G, ‘The New EU Regulation 1215/2012 of 12 December 2012 on Jurisdiction and International Arbitration: With Notes on Parallel Arbitration, Court Proceedings and the EU Commission’s Proposal’ (2013) 29 Arbitration International 467Google Scholar

Carter, JH, ‘Part 1 – Issues Arising from Integrated Dispute Resolution Clauses’ in van den Berg, AJ (ed), New Horizons in International Commercial Arbitration and Beyond (ICCA Congress Series No 12, Kluwer Law International 2005)Google Scholar

Catala, P and Terré, F, Procédure civile et voies d’exécution (2nd edn, Presses universitaires de France 1976)Google Scholar

CEDR Commission on Settlement in International Arbitration, Final Report (2009) <www.imimediation.org/download/102/public-libraries/31875/cedr-arbitration_commission_doc_final-nov-2009.pdf> accessed 15 April 2021+accessed+15+April+2021>Google Scholar

CEDR Model ADR Clauses for Commercial Contracts, Version 2020 <www.cedr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Model-ADR-Clauses-for-Commercial-Contracts-2020.docx> accessed 19 November 2020+accessed+19+November+2020>Google Scholar

Cha, E, ‘Enforcement of International Mediated Settlement Agreements in Asia: A Path towards Convergence’ (2019) 15(1) Asian International Arbitration Journal 11Google Scholar

Chaisse, J and Górski, J (eds), The Belt and Road Initiative: Law, Economics, and Politics (Brill 2018)Google Scholar

Chan, N, ‘eBRAM Centre: The Law Tech Deal-Making & Dispute Resolution Platform to Facilitate Cross-Border Trade’ <www.lscm.hk/sites/summit2018/eng/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Nick-Chan_eBRAM-Centre-3Oct2018_.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Chapman, S, ‘Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses: Enforcing Obligations to Negotiate in Good Faith’ (2010) 27 Journal of International Arbitration 89Google Scholar

Chen, Ai’e and Wu, Congzhou, ‘Yi qiangzhi zhongcai tujing jiejue gonggong gongcheng caigou qiyue lvyue zhengyi zhi yanjiu’ [Research on Resolving Public Construction Procurement Contract Performance Disputes through Mandatory Arbitration] (2010) <www.ndc.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=E4F9C91CF6EA4EC4&sms=4506D295372B40FB&s=D96F97CBFFF7BF8F> accessed 23 September 2020+accessed+23+September+2020>Google Scholar

Chen, AHY, ‘Confucian Legal Culture and Its Modern Fate’ in Wacks, R (ed), The New Legal Order in Hong Kong (Hong Kong University Press 1999)Google Scholar

Chen, S and Chua, E, ‘Singapore Civil Procedure’ in Taleman, P (ed), International Encyclopedia of Laws (3rd edn, Kluwer Law and Business International 2018)Google Scholar

Chen, Y, ‘Gongcheng caigou lvyue zhengyi yu xin zhongcai jizhi zhi tantao’ [A Discussion on Construction Procurement Contract Performance Disputes within the New Arbitration Framework] (2018) 13(2) Gaoda faxue luncong 7Google Scholar

Cheng, T-H, ‘Reflections on Culture in Med-arb’ in Rovine, AW (ed), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers (2009) (Brill 2010)Google Scholar

Cheng, T, ‘COVID-19 Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Scheme’ (Department of Justice, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 13 April 2020) <www.doj.gov.hk/eng/public/blog/20200413_blog1.html> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Cheng, T ‘Stand in Solidarity Against COVID-19’ (Department of Justice, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 11 April 2020) <www.doj.gov.hk/eng/public/blog/20200411_blog1.html> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Cheng, T and Liu, J, ‘Enforcement of Foreign Awards in Mainland China: Current Practices and Future Trends’ (2014) 31(5) Journal of International Arbitration 651Google Scholar

China International Commercial Court, Procedural Rules for the China International Commercial Court of the Supreme People’s Court (For Trial Implementation) <http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/219/208/210/1183.html> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, ‘China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Arbitration Rules’ (2015) <http://cietac.org/index.php?m=Page&a=index&id=106&l=en> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Zhongguo guoji shangshi zhongcai niandu baogao (2016) [Annual Report on International Commercial Arbitration in China (2016)] <www.cietac.org/Uploads/201710/59df3824b2849.pdf> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission ‘China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission International Investment Arbitration Rules (For Trial Implementation)’ (2017) <http://cietac.org/index.php?m=Page&a=index&id=390&l=en> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

Chiou, L-G, The Theory of Procedural Choice (Sanmin 2000)Google Scholar

Chiu, H-J, ‘New Constructions of Family Dispute Proceedings’ [2002] Taiwan Law Journal 18Google Scholar

Choi, J-S, ‘Mediation Cases: Corporation-Related Disputes’ (2019) 1 Asian Pacific Mediation Journal 99Google Scholar

Chong, A (ed), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Asia (Asian Business Law Institute 2017)Google Scholar

Chua, E, ‘Enforcement of Mediated Settlement Agreements in Asia – A Path towards Convergence’ (2019) 15(1) Asian International Arbitration Journal 1Google Scholar

Coben, JR and Thompson, PN, ‘Disputing Irony: A Systematic Look at Litigation about Mediation’ (2006) 11 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 43Google Scholar

Collins, L and Harris, J (eds), Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws (15th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2012)Google Scholar

Comeau, M, ‘In Defense of Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses’ (ADR Perspectives, 17 December 2019) <http://adric.ca/adr-perspectives/in-defence-of-tiered-dispute-resolution-clauses/> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Corréa, J-L, ‘La médiation et la conciliation n droit sénégalais: libres propos sur un texte réglementaire’ (2017) Bulletin de droit économique 1Google Scholar

Cortes, P, Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the European Union (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar

Couchez, G, Procédure civile (12th edn, Armand Colin 2002)Google Scholar

Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, ‘Notice to the Profession & Public – Enforcement of Mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules 8.4(3)(A) and 8.5(1)(A)’ (Alberta Courts, 2 July 2019) <https://albertacourts.ca/qb/resources/announcements/notice-to-the-profession-public–enforcement-of-mandatory-alternative-dispute-resolution-rules-8.4(3)(a)-and-8.5(1)(a)> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, ‘Notice to the Profession: Mandatory Dispute Resolution Requirement Before Entry for Trial’ (Alberta Courts, 12 February 2013) <https://albertacourts.ca/docs/default-source/qb/npp/notice-to-the-profession-public–mandatory-dispute-resolution-requirement-before-entry-for-trial–2013–01.pdf?sfvrsn=5664ac80_4> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Creutzfeldt, N, ‘Implementation of the Consumer ADR Directive’ (2016) 5(4) Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 169Google Scholar

Croft, C, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in Arbitration: Is Arb-med Really an Option?’ (November 2014) <www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/about-the-court/speeches/alternative-dispute-resolution-in-arbitration-is-arb-med-really-an-option> accessed 16 August 2020+accessed+16+August+2020>Google Scholar

Deason, EE, ‘Combinations of Mediation and Arbitration with the Same Neutral: A Framework for Judicial Review’ (2013) 5 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation 219Google Scholar

Deason, EE ‘Beyond “Managerial Judges”: Appropriate Roles in Settlement’ (2017) 78(1) Ohio State Law Journal 105Google Scholar

Dedov, D and Molotnikov, A (eds), Dispute Resolution in Russia: The Essentials (Statut 2019)Google Scholar

DeGroote, J, ‘The Multi-step Dispute Resolution Clause: A Few Reasons Clients Like Them’ (Mediate.com, April 2010) <www.mediate.com/articles/DeGrooteJbl20100405.cfm> accessed 29 August 2020+accessed+29+August+2020>Google Scholar

Delabrière, A and Fenon, A, ‘La constitution du tribunal arbitral et le statut de l’arbitre dans l’Acte uniforme OHADA’ (2000) Revue Penant numéro spécial no 833Google Scholar

De Loisy, N, Transportation and the Belt and Road Initiative: A Paradigm Shift (SCMO Research 2019)Google Scholar

Dendorfer, R and Lack, J, ‘The Interaction between Arbitration and Mediation: Vision vs. Reality’ (2007) 1 Dispute Resolution International 1Google Scholar

De Palo, G and Trevor, MB, Arbitration and Mediation in the Southern Mediterranean Countries (Kluwer 2007)Google Scholar

De Palo, G and Trevor, MB , Feasley, A and Orecchini, F, ‘Quantifying the Cost of Not Using Mediation – A Data Analysis’ (April 2011) <www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201105/20110518ATT19592/20110518ATT19592EN.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

De Palo, G and Trevor, MB, Feasley, A and Orecchini, F and others, ‘“Rebooting” the Mediation Directive: Assessing the Limited Impact of Its Implementation and Proposing Measures to Increase the Number of Mediations in the EU’ (January 2014) <www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2014/493042/IPOL-JURI_ET(2014)493042_EN.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Department of Justice, ‘2018 Policy Initiatives of the Department of Justice’ (CB(4)20/18–19(01)), paper prepared for a discussion of the Legislative Council Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services on 29 October 2018 (Legislative Council of the HKSAR, October 2018) <www.legco.gov.hk/yr18-19/english/panels/ajls/papers/ajlscb4-20–1-e.pdf> accessed 1 October 2020+accessed+1+October+2020>Google Scholar

De Roo, AJ and Jagtenberg, RW, ‘ADR in the European Union: Provisional Assessment of Comparative Research in Progress’ in Cadiet, L and others (eds), Médiation et Arbitrage: Alternative Dispute Resolution: Alternative à la Justice ou Justice Alternative? Perspectives Comparatives (LexisNexis 2005)Google Scholar

Dickerson, CM, ‘Harmonizing Business Law in Africa: OHADA Calls the Tune’ (2005) 44 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 17Google Scholar

Dogauchi, M, ‘Nihon Shoji Chusai Kyokai (JCAA) no atarashii ugoki – 3tsu no Shin Chusai Kisoku no Seko to [New Movements of the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association – Putting into Force of Three New Arbitration Rules]’ [2020] New Business Law 1141Google Scholar

Donahey, MS, ‘Seeking Harmony: Is the Asian Concept of the Conciliator/Arbitrator Applicable in the West?’ (1995) 50 Dispute Resolution Journal 74Google Scholar

Douajni, GK, ‘Bilan et perspectives de l’arbitrage OHADA 20 ans après la création de l’OHADA’ (2014) 48 Rev Burkinabède droit 158Google Scholar

Douajni, K, ‘Les mesures provisoires et conservatoires dans l’arbitrage OHADA’ (2000) 8 Revue Camerounaise de l’Arbitrage 3Google Scholar

Duguid, B, ‘Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution: Stepping Carefully’ (Mondaq, 20 August 2008) <www.mondaq.com/canada/x/65050/Arbitration+Dispute+Resolution/MultiTiered+Dispute+Resolution+Stepping+Carefully> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Edwards, L and Wilson, C, ‘Redress and Alternative Dispute Resolution in EU Cross-Border E-commerce Transactions’ (2007) 21 International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 3Google Scholar

Ehle, B, ‘The Arbitrator as Settlement Facilitator’ in Caprasse, O (ed), Walking a Thin Line – What an Arbitrator Can Do, Must Do or Must Not Do: Recent Developments and Trends (Bruylant 2010)Google Scholar

Equal Opportunities Commission, ‘Report on Review of the Equal Opportunities Commission Governance, Management Structure and Complaint Handling Process’ (Equal Opportunities Commission, 13 December 2019) <www.eoc.org.hk/EOC/Upload/UserFiles/File/Process_Review/EOCs_Review_Report_E.pdf> accessed 1 September 2020+accessed+1+September+2020>Google Scholar

Esplugues, C, ‘Access to Justice or Access to States Courts’ Justice in Europe? The Directive 2008/52/EC on Civil and Commercial Mediation’ (2013) 38 Revista de Processo (RePro) 304Google Scholar

Esplugues, C ‘Mediation in the EU after the Transposition of the Directive 2008/52/EC on Mediation in Civil and Commercial Matters’ in Esplugues, C (ed), Civil and Commercial Mediation in Europe (Volume II: Cross-Border Mediation) (Intersentia 2014)Google Scholar

Esplugues, C ‘General Report: New Developments in Civil and Commercial Mediation – Global Comparative Perspectives’ in Esplugues, C and Marquis, L (eds), New Developments in Civil and Commercial Mediation (Springer 2015)Google Scholar

Fan, K, ‘Mediation and Civil Justice Reform in Hong Kong’ (2011) 27 International Litigation Quarterly 2Google Scholar

Fan, K ‘The New Arbitration Ordinance in Hong Kong’ (2012) 29 Journal of International Arbitration 719Google Scholar

Fan, K ‘An Empirical Study of Arbitrators Acting as Mediators in China’ (2014) 15(3) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 777Google Scholar

Farmer, D and Kley, S, ‘Med-arbs – Practical Considerations for Getting the Best of Both’ (ADR Institute of Canada, May 2018) <https://adric.ca/adr-perspectives/med-arbs-practical-considerations-for-getting-the-best-of-both> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Fauteux, P, ‘Online Dispute Settlement: Quebec on a Promising Path’ (2019) 28(1) Canadian Arbitration and Mediation Journal 19Google Scholar

Feasley, A, ‘Regulating Mediator Qualifications in the 2008 EU Mediation Directive: The Need for a Supranational Standard’ [2011] Journal of Dispute Resolution 333Google Scholar

Fèviliyé, I, ‘La Révision du Traité de l’OHADA’ (2009) Revue Congolaise de Droit et des Affaires 1Google Scholar

Fiechter, EW, ‘Mediation – Casting Issues: Can or Should the Same Person Be Mediator, or Conciliator and Arbitrator?’ (2008) 15 Croatian Arbitration Year Book 255Google Scholar

Financial Dispute Resolution Centre, ‘FDRC Annual Report 2013’ <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/annualreport/2013/files/download/FDRC_annual_report.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Financial Dispute Resolution Centre ‘Proposals to Enhance the Financial Dispute Resolution Scheme: Consultation Paper’ (October 2016) <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/doc/Consultation_Document_ToR_EN.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Financial Dispute Resolution Centre ‘FDRC Annual Report 2017’ <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/annualreport/2017/files/download/FDRC_annual_report.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Financial Dispute Resolution Centre ‘Consumer Fact Sheets 2018’ <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/html/publications/publications_factsheetleaflet.php> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Financial Dispute Resolution Centre ‘FDRC Annual Report 2018’ <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/annualreport/2018/files/download/FDRC_annual_report.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Financial Dispute Resolution Centre ‘FDRC Mediation and Arbitration Rules 2018’ <www.fdrc.org.hk/en/doc/FDRS_Mediation_and_Arbitration_Rules_2018_en.pdf> accessed 2 April 2021+accessed+2+April+2021>Google Scholar

Flannery, L and Merkin, R, ‘Emirates Trading, Good Faith and Pre-arbitral ADR Clauses: A Jurisdictional Precondition’ (2015) 31 Arbitration International 63Google Scholar

Friedland, PD, Arbitration Clauses for International Contracts (2nd edn, JurisNet 2007)Google Scholar

Friel, S and Toms, C, ‘The European Mediation Directive – Legal and Political Support for Alternative Dispute Resolution in Europe’ (2011) 2 Bloomberg Law Reports – Alternative Dispute Resolution 3Google Scholar

Fu, H and Cullen, R, ‘From Mediatory to Adjudicatory Justice: The Limits of Civil Justice Reform in China’, in Woo, MYK and Gallagher, ME (eds), Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China (Cambridge University Press 2011)Google Scholar

Garimella, SR and Siddiqui, NA, ‘The Enforceability of Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses: Contemporary Judicial Opinion’ (2016) 24(1) IIUM Law Journal 166Google Scholar

Garnett, R, ‘Australia’s International and Domestic Arbitration Framework’ in Moens, G and Evans, P (eds), Arbitration and Dispute Resolution in the Resources Sector: An Australian Perspective (Springer 2015)Google Scholar

Golann, D, ‘Is Legal Mediation a Process of Repair – Or Separation? An Empirical Study, and Its Implications’ (2002) 7 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 301Google Scholar

Goldberg, SB, ‘The Mediation of Grievances under a Collective Bargaining Contract: An Alternative to Arbitration’ (1982) 77 Northwestern University Law Review 270Google Scholar

Golvan, G, ‘What Do Clients Really Want – Hybrid Procedures, the New Frontier of Alternative Dispute Resolution’ (2014) 1(4) Australian Alternative Dispute Resolution Law Bulletin 80Google Scholar

Goodrich, M, ‘Arb-med: Ideal Solution or Dangerous Heresy?’ (2016) Construction Law Journal 370Google Scholar

Gorla, G, ‘Standard Conditions and Form Contracts in Italian Law’ (1962) 11 American Journal of Comparative Law 1Google Scholar

Grimmer, S, ‘Distinction and Connection: Hong Kong and Mainland China, a View from the HKIAC’ (Global Arbitration Review, 24 May 2019) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/insight/the-asia-pacific-arbitration-review-2020/1193369/distinction-and-connection-hong-kong-and-mainland-china-a-view-from-the-hkiac> accessed 25 August 2020+accessed+25+August+2020>Google Scholar

Grimmer, S and Charemi, C, ‘Dispute Resolution along the Belt and Road’ (Global Arbitration Review, 22 May 2017) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/chapter/1141929/dispute-resolution-along-the-belt-and-read> accessed 25 August 2020+accessed+25+August+2020>Google Scholar

Gross, JI, ‘Justice Scalia’s Hat Trick and the Supreme Court’s Flawed Understanding of Twenty-First Century Arbitration’ (2015) 81 Brook Law Review 111Google Scholar

Grutters, L and Barr, BS, FIDIC Red, Yellow and Silver Books: A Practical Guide to the 2017 Editions (Sweet & Maxwell 2018)Google Scholar

Gu, W, Arbitration in China: Regulation of Arbitration Agreements and Practical Issues (Sweet & Maxwell 2012)Google Scholar

Gu, W ‘The Delicate Art of Med-Arb and Its Future Institutionalization in China’ (2014) 31 UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 97Google Scholar

Gu, W ‘When Local Meets International: Mediation Combined with Arbitration in China and Its Prospective Reform in a Comparative Context’ (2016) 10(2) Journal of Comparative Law 84Google Scholar

Gu, W ‘China’s Belt and Road Development and a New International Commercial Arbitration Initiative in Asia’ (2018) 51(5) Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1305Google Scholar

Gu, W ‘Looking at Arbitration through a Comparative Lens’ (2018) 13(2) Journal of Comparative Law 164Google Scholar

Gu, W ‘Hybrid Dispute Resolution Beyond the Belt and Road: Toward a New Design of Chinese Arb-med(-arb) and Its Global Implications’ (2019) 29(1) Washington International Law Journal 117Google Scholar

Gu, W ‘Multi-tier Approaches and Global Dispute Resolution’ (2020) 63 Japanese Yearbook of International Law 127Google Scholar

Gu, W and Zhang, X, ‘The Keeneye Case: Rethinking the Content of Public Policy in Cross-Border Arbitration between Hong Kong and Mainland China’ (2012) 42(3) Hong Kong Law Journal 1006Google Scholar

Guyon, Y, ‘Conclusion’ (2004) 205 Les petites affiches 59Google Scholar

Hahm, P-C, The Korean Political Tradition and Law (Royal Asiatic Society Korea Branch 1967)Google Scholar

Hahm, P-C Korean Jurisprudence, Politics, and Culture (Yonsei University Press 1986)Google Scholar

Hamada, Y, ‘Minkan no Chotei ni yotteha Funso ga Kaiketsu sarenai toki ni Saibansho ni okeru Hoteki Shudan wo Kaishi suru Mune no Goi ga aru Baai ni oite, Togai Minkan no Chotei no Tetsuzuki wo hezuni Teiki sareta Sosho ga, Sosho Yoken ni kakeru mono deha nai to sareta Jirei [A Lawsuit Brought to the Courts without Prior Reference to Mediation Was Held to Fulfil Procedural Requirements, Although the Parties Had Agreed to Commence Litigation only When a Private Mediation Failed to Resolve Their Disputes]’ (2012) Shiho Hanrei Remarks 45Google Scholar

Hamid Sultan bin Abu Backer, Haji, ‘Singapore Mediation Convention: Is the Rule of Law Intact?’ (CIArb Features, 6 September 2019) <www.ciarb.org/resources/features/singapore-mediation-convention-is-the-rule-of-law-intact/> accessed 1 October 2020+accessed+1+October+2020>Google Scholar

Hann, RG and others, ‘Evaluation of Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program (Rule 24.1)’ (Legislative Assembly of Ontario, 12 March 2001) <www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/1000/10294958.pdf> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Harpole, SA, ‘The Combination of Conciliation with Arbitration in the People’s Republic of China’ (2007) 24(6) Journal of International Arbitration 623Google Scholar

Harrison, D, ‘Singapore Convention a Big Boost for International Mediation’ (The Lawyer’s Daily, 17 December 2019) <www.thelawyersdaily.ca/articles/17194> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Hart, S, ‘England’ in Acomb, FA and others (eds), Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses (IBA Litigation Committee, 1 October 2015) <www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=9C6E21DE-043C-44C9-BE75-94CADECCF470> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

Hay, P, ‘Notes on the European Union’s Brussels-I “Recast” Regulation’ (2013) 1 European Legal Forum 1Google Scholar

Henderson, A and Chua, E, ‘Singapore International Mediation Centre Is Launched, Offering Parties an “Arb-med-arb” Process in Partnership with SIAC’ (Herbert Smith Freehills, 11 December 2014) <https://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/tag/ama-protocol/> accessed 25 October 2018+accessed+25+October+2018>Google Scholar

Herbert Smith Freehills and PricewaterhouseCoopers, Global Pound Conference Series: Global Data Trends and Regional Differences (2018) <www.imimediation.org/download/909/reports/35507/global-data-trends-and-regional-differences.pdf> accessed 2 April 2021+accessed+2+April+2021>Google Scholar

Herisi, AA and Trachte-Huber, W, ‘Aftermath of the Singapore Convention: A Comparative Analysis between the Singapore Convention and the New York Convention’ (2019) 12 American Journal of Mediation 154Google Scholar

Hetzel, OJ and Gonzales, S (eds), Alternative Dispute Resolution in State and Local Governments: Analysis and Case Studies (ABA Book Publishing 2015)Google Scholar

Hioureas, C and Tewarie, S, ‘A New Legal Framework for the Enforcement of Settlement Agreements Reached through International Mediation: UNCITRAL Concludes Negotiations on Convention and Draft Model Law’ (EJIL: Talk!, 26 March 2018) <www.ejiltalk.org/a-new-legal-framework/for-the-enforcement-of-settlement-agreements-reached-through-international-mediation-uncitral-concludes-negotiations-on-convention-and-draft-model-law/> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

HM Treasury, ‘Standardisation of PF2 Contracts’ <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/207383/infrastructure_standardisation_of_contracts_051212.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Hollander-Blumoff, R, ‘Just Negotiation’ (2010) 88 Washington University Law Review 381Google Scholar

Hong Kong Institute of Arbitrators, Draft Report of the Committee of the Hong Kong Arbitration Law (June 2002) <www.hkiac.org/sites/default/files/ck_filebrowser/PDF/services/95.pdf> accessed 2 April 2021+accessed+2+April+2021>Google Scholar

Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, 2018 Administered Arbitration Rules <www.hkiac.org/arbitration/rules-practice-notes/hkiac-administered-2018> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

Hugo, V, Discours d’ouverture du Congrès littéraire international de 1878 (Calmann Lévy 1878)Google Scholar

Hussin, A, Kück, C and Alexander, N, ‘SIAC-SIMC’s Arb-Med-Arb Protocol’ (2018) 11 New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer 85Google Scholar

Hwang, S and Inkook, K, Hangukhyeong daechejeok bunjaeng haegyeol (ADR) jedo ui baljeon banghyange gwanhan yeongu [A Study for the Development of Korean-Style ADR Systems] Research Monograph 2016–04, Publication Registration No 32–9741568–000851–01 (Judicial Policy Research Institute 2016)Google Scholar

International Bar Association Litigation Committee, ‘Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses’ (October 2015) <www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=9C6E21DE-043C-44C9-BE75-94CADECCF470> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Issa-Sayegh, J, ‘Quelques Aspects Techniques de l’Intégration Juridique: l’Exemple des Actes Uniformes de l’OHADA’ [1999] Uniform Law Review 5Google Scholar

Issa-Sayegh, J ‘La portée abrogatoire des Actes Uniformes de l’OHADA sur le droit interne des Etats-Parties’ (2001) 40 Revue Burkinabè de Droit 51Google Scholar

Issa-Sayegh, J and Lohoues-Oble, J, Harmonisation du droit des affaires (Collection Droit uniforme africain) (Bruxelles 2002)Google Scholar

Issa-Sayegh, J and Lohoues-Oble, J , Pougoué, P-G and Sawadogo, FM, OHADA: Traité et Actes Uniformes commentés et annotés (Juriscopte 2014)Google Scholar

James, R and Morris, P, ‘The New Financial Ombudsman Service in the United Kingdom: Has the Second Generation Got It Right?’ in Rickett, CEF and Telfer, TGW (eds), International Perspectives on Consumers’ Access to Justice (Cambridge University Press 2003)Google Scholar

JAMS, JAMS Clause Workbook: A Guide to Drafting Clauses for International and Cross-Border Commercial Contracts (2018) <www.jamsadr.com/files/Uploads/Documents/JAMS-Rules/JAMS-International-Clause-Workbook.pdf> accessed 2 April 2021+accessed+2+April+2021>Google Scholar

Jeong, SJ, ‘Singapore Convention on Mediation and Recognition and Enforcement of Settlement Agreement’ (2020) 24 Civil Procedure 1Google Scholar

Jolles, A, ‘Consequences of Multi-tier Arbitration Clauses: Issues of Enforcement’ (2006) 72(4) Arbitration 329Google Scholar

Jones, D, Commercial Arbitration in Australia (2nd edn, Thomson Reuters 2013)Google Scholar

Kajkowska, E, Enforceability of Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses (Hart 2017)Google Scholar

Kaneko, H and others (eds), Jokai Minji Soshoho [Commentary of the Code of Civil Procedure] (2nd edn, Kobundo 2011)Google Scholar

Kantor, E and Parrott, P, ‘“Gaps” Can End in Tears’ (Herbert Smith Freehills, August/September 2016) <http://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2016/08/GapsCanEndInTears.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Kapai, P, ‘The Hong Kong Equal Opportunities Commission: Calling for a New Avatar’ (2009) 39 Hong Kong Law Journal 339Google Scholar

Karton, J, ‘Beyond the “Harmonious Confucian”: International Commercial Arbitration and the Impact of Chinese Cultural Values’ in Lo, C-f, Li, NNT and Lin, T-y (eds), Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order (Springer 2016)Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G, ‘When Arbitrators Facilitate Settlement: Towards a Transnational Standard’ (Clayton UTZ 2007) <www.claytonutz.com/internal/archive/ialecture/content/previous/2007/speech_2007> accessed 14 January 2018+accessed+14+January+2018>Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G ‘When Arbitrators Facilitate Settlement: Towards a Transnational Standard’ (2009) 25(2) Arbitration International 198Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G and Bonnin, V, Arbitrators as Conciliators: A Statistical Study of the Relation between an Arbitrator’s Role and Legal Background (International Council for Commercial Arbitration) <https://cdn.arbitration-icca.org/s3fs-public/document/media_document/media01231914460597000950003.pdf> accessed 14 January 2018+accessed+14+January+2018>Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G and Bonnin, V and Fan, K, ‘Integrating Mediation into Arbitration: Why It Works in China’ (2008) 4 Journal of International Arbitration 479Google Scholar

Kayali, D, ‘Enforceability of Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses’ (2010) 27(6) Journal of International Arbitration 551Google Scholar

Kemfouet, É-D, ‘Droit des libertés publiques comparé: une nouvelle: avant sa disparition annoncée, la Cour Africaine des Droits de l’Homme et des peuples rend son premier arrêt (Affaire Michelot Yogogombaye c. République du Sénégal)’ (2011) 45(1) Revue juridique Thémis 151Google Scholar

Kikui, T and Muramatsu, T, Konmentaru Minji Soshoho [Commentary of the Code of Civil Procedure], vol 3 (2nd edn, Nihon Hyoronsha 2019)Google Scholar

Kim, D, ‘Sosong jeungganeun gyesok doel geosinga? jesoyulkwa kyeongje yoin bunseok’ [Will the Increase of Litigation Continue? An Analysis of the Relationships between the Litigation Rate and Economic Factors] (2015) 48 Beop gwa sahoe [Korean Journal of Law and Society] 249Google Scholar

Kim, D and Lee, C, ‘Dispute Resolution in South Korea’ in Palmer, M, Roberts, M and Moscati, M (eds), Comparative Dispute Resolution (Edward Elgar 2020)Google Scholar

Kim, J, International Arbitration in Korea (Oxford University Press 2017)Google Scholar

Kim, NH and others, ‘Community and Industrial Mediation in South Korea’ (1993) 37 Journal of Conflict Resolution 361Google Scholar

Kim, S and Kim, Y, ‘Management of Overseas Construction Claims in Preparation for International Arbitration’ (2013) 22 Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law 103Google Scholar

Kiser, R, How Leading Lawyers Think: Expert Insights into Judgment and Advocacy (Springer 2011)Google Scholar

Kokusai Chusai Seido Kenkyukai [Working Group on International Arbitration], ‘Wagakuni ni okeru Kokusai Chusai no Hatten ni mukete – Nihon Chusai no Kasseika wo Jitsugen suru 7tsu no Teigen’ [Towards Developments of International Arbitration in Japan – 7 Proposals for Enhancing Arbitration in Japan] [2018] New Business Law 1125Google Scholar

Krauss, O, ‘The Enforceability of Escalation Clauses Providing for Negotiations in Good Faith under English Law’ [2015–2016] (2) McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution 142Google Scholar

Krennbauer, S, ‘Enforceability of Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Business Contracts’ (2010) 1 Yearbook on International Arbitration 199Google Scholar

Kryvoi, Y, ‘Enforcement of Settlement Agreements Reached in Arbitration and Mediation’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 25 November 2015) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2015/11/25/enforcement-of-settlement-agreements-reached-in-arbitration-and-mediation/> accessed 25 October 2018+accessed+25+October+2018>Google Scholar

Kryvoi, Y and Yokomizo, D, ‘Improving Arbitration Climate in Japan – Report and Recommendations’ (SSRN, 9 November 2016) <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2865717> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

Lande, J, ‘Failing Faith in Litigation? A Survey of Business Lawyers’ and Executives’ Opinions’ (1998) 3 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 1Google Scholar

Landry, S, ‘Med-arb: Mediation with a Bite and an Effective ADR Model’ (1996) 63 Defense Counsel Journal 263Google Scholar

Lawrence, A, Nugent, J and Scarfone, C, ‘The Effectiveness of Using Mediation in Selected Civil Law Disputes: A Meta-analysis’ (Department of Justice, 7 January 2015) <www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rr07_3/index.html> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Lee, J, ‘Agreements to Negotiate in Good Faith’ [2013] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 212Google Scholar

Legislative Council Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services, ‘Review of the Implementation of Civil Justice Reform’ (18 May 2015) <www.legco.gov.hk/yr14-15/english/panels/ajls/papers/ajls20150518cb4-964-5-e.pdf> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

Levin, LA and Wheeler, RR, The Pound Conference: Perspectives on Justice in the Future (West Publishing 1979)Google Scholar

Lew, JDM, Mistelis, LA and Kröll, SM, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (Wolters Kluwer 2003)Google Scholar

Li, K and Cheung, SO, ‘The Potential of Bias in Multi-tier Construction Dispute Resolution Processes’ in Chan, PW and Neilson, CJ (eds), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference (ARCOM 2016)Google Scholar

Lim, G and Chua, E, ‘Development of Mediation in Singapore’ in McFadden, D and Lim, G (eds), Mediation in Singapore: A Practical Guide (2nd edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2017)Google Scholar

Limbury, A, ‘Don’t Be Scared, This Is the Future – Avoiding the Pitfalls of Arb-med-arb’ (2014) 1(4) Australian Alternative Dispute Resolution Law Bulletin 84Google Scholar

Lipsky, DB and Seeber, RL, ‘In Search of Control: The Corporate Embrace of ADR’ (1998) 1 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law 133Google Scholar

Liu, J and Benlafkih, O, ‘Resolving Disputes from Belt and Road Projects’ in CDR Essential Intelligence: Belt & Road Initiative (Global Legal Group Ltd 2020)Google Scholar

Liu, X, ‘The Latest Innovation for Mediation in China – From the Perspective of SCIA’ (pkulaw.com 2014) <http://pkulaw.cn/fulltext_form.aspx?Gid=1510155206&Db=eqikan> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

London Court of International Arbitration, ‘2019 Annual Casework Report’ (19 May 2020) <www.lcia.org/media/download.aspx?MediaId=816> accessed 19 November 2020+accessed+19+November+2020>Google Scholar

Loong, SO and Koh, D, ‘Enforceability of Dispute Resolution Clauses in Singapore’ [2016] Asian Journal of Mediation 51Google Scholar

Lum, A, ‘How Hong Kong Plans to Take Arbitration Online with New eBRAM Project’ South China Morning Post (Hong Kong, 8 April 2019) <www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3005025/how-hong-kong-plans-take-arbitration-online-new-ebram> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Lurie, PM, ‘Using the Guided Choice Process to Reduce the Cost of Resolving Disputes’ (2014) 9 Construction Law International 18Google Scholar

Lurie, PM and Lack, J, ‘Guided Choice Dispute Resolution Processes: Reducing the Time and Expense to Settlement’ (2014) 8 Dispute Resolution International 167Google Scholar

Lye, KC, ‘A Persisting Aberration: The Movement to Enforce Agreements to Mediate’ (2008) 20 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 195Google Scholar

Lynch, K, ‘Private Conciliation of Discrimination Disputes: Confidentiality, Informalism and Power’ (paper presented at a conference on Enforcing Equal Opportunities in Hong Kong: An Evaluation of Conciliation and Other Enforcement Powers of the EOC, June 2003)Google Scholar

MacFarlane, J and Keet, M, ‘Civil Justice Reform and Mandatory Civil Mediation in Saskatchewan: Lessons from a Maturing Program’ (2005) 42(3) Alberta Law Reports 677Google Scholar

Marrie, M, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in Administration Litigation: A Call for Mandatory Mediation’ (2010) 37(2) Advocates’ Quarterly 149Google Scholar

Mason, PE, ‘The Arbitrator as Mediator, and Mediator as Arbitrator’ (2011) 28(6) Journal of International Arbitration 541Google Scholar

McEwen, CA, ‘Managing Corporate Disputing: Overcoming Barriers to the Effective Use of Mediation for Reducing the Cost and Time of Litigation’ (1998) 14 Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution 1Google Scholar

McEwen, CA and Maiman, RJ, ‘Small Claims Mediation in Maine: An Empirical Assessment’ (1981) 33 Maine Law Review 237Google Scholar

McFadden, D, ‘Mediation/Arbitration’ in Brock, D (ed), Arbitration in Hong Kong (Sweet & Maxwell 2011)Google Scholar

McFadden, D Mediation in Greater China: The New Frontier for Commercial Mediation (CCH Hong Kong Ltd 2013)Google Scholar

McIlwrath, M, ‘UNCITRAL to Consider Proposal for Convention on Enforcement of Mediated Settlements’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 7 July 2014) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2014/07/07/uncitral-to-consider-proposal-for-convention-on-enforcement-of-mediated-settlements/> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C, ‘Regulation of Dispute Resolution in the United States of America: From the Formal to the Informal to the “Semi-formal”’ in Steffek, F and others (eds), Regulating Dispute Resolution: ADR and Access to Justice at the Crossroads (Hart 2013)Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C ‘Alternative and Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Context Formal, Informal, and Semiformal Legal Processes’ in Coleman, PT, Deutsch, M and Marcus, EC (eds), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice (Wiley 2014)Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C Mediation: Practice, Policy, and Ethics (Aspen 2018)Google Scholar

Menon, S, ‘Arbitrator’s Blade: International Arbitration and the Rule of Law’ (Supreme Court of Singapore, 2 September 2020) <www.supremecourt.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/siac-virtual-congress-2020–arbitration%27s-blade–international-arbitration-and-the-rule-of-law-(020920-as-delivered).pdf> accessed 1 October 2020+accessed+1+October+2020>Google Scholar

Merkin, R and Hjalmarsson, J, Singapore Arbitration Legislation Annotated (2nd edn, Informa Law 2016)Google Scholar

Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation, Report on Status and Activities of Committees, 31 December 2016Google Scholar

Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation Report on Status and Activities of Committees, 30 June 2019Google Scholar

Ministry of Commerce of People’s Republic of China, ‘Report on Development of China’s Outward Investment and Economic Cooperation’ (2018) <http://images.mofcom.gov.cn/fec/201901/20190128155348158.pdf> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

Nadar, A, ‘Construction Arbitration in the Context of China’s Belt and Road Projects’ in Brekoulakis, S and Thomas, DB (eds), The Guide to Construction Arbitration (Global Arbitration Review 2018)Google Scholar

Nakamura, T, ‘Brief Empirical Study on Arb-med in the JCAA Arbitration’ <www.jcaa.or.jp/e/arbitration/docs/news22.pdf> accessed 24 September 2020 Chusaiho no Ronten [Issues on Arbitration Law] (Seibundo 2017)+accessed+24+September+2020+Chusaiho+no+Ronten+[Issues+on+Arbitration+Law]+(Seibundo+2017)>Google Scholar

Nakano, S, ‘Minkan Chotei de Funso ga Kaiketsu sarenai toki ni Saiban Tetsuzuki wo Kaishisuru Mune no Goi no Koryoku’ [Effects of an Agreement to Institute Litigation When Disputes Cannot Be Resolved in Mediation by Private Institutions] [2012] 636 Hanrei Hyoron 171Google Scholar

Nelson, N and Stipanowich, TJ, Commercial Mediation in Europe: Better Solutions for Business (International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution 2004)Google Scholar

Ng, P-L and Banaitis, A, ‘Construction Mediation and Its Hybridization: The Case of the Hong Kong Construction Industry’ (2017) 9 Organization, Technology and Management in Construction 1528Google Scholar

Ngwanza, A, ‘L’essor de l’arbitrage international en Afrique subsaharienne: les apports de la CCJA’ (2013) 3 Revue de l’ERSUMA 31Google Scholar

Nigmatullina, D, ‘The Combined Use of Mediation and Arbitration in Commercial Dispute Resolution: Results from an International Study’ (2016) 33(1) Journal of International Arbitration 37Google Scholar

Nigmatullina, D Combining Mediation and Arbitration in International Commercial Dispute Resolution (Routledge 2018)Google Scholar

Nigmatullina, D ‘Aligning Dispute Resolution Processes with Global Demands for Change: Enhancing the Use of Mediation and Arbitration in Combination’ [2019] Belgian Review of Arbitration 7Google Scholar

Ning, F and Liu, J, ‘Mediation Meets Arbitration – The Experience of Med-arb in Mainland China and Hong Kong’ (2014) 1(5) Alternative Dispute Resolution Law 97Google Scholar

Nishitani, Y, ‘Coordination of Legal Systems by the Recognition of Foreign Judgments – Rethinking Reciprocity in Sino-Japanese Relationships’ (2019) 14(2) Frontiers of Law in China 193Google Scholar

Nolan-Haley, JM, ‘Lawyers, Non-lawyers and Mediation: Rethinking the Professional Monopoly from a Problem-Solving Perspective’ (2002) 7 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 235Google Scholar

Nolan-Haley, JM ‘Mediation: The “New Arbitration”’ (2012) 17 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 6Google Scholar

Nolan-Haley, JM Alternative Dispute Resolution in a Nutshell (4th edn, West Academic 2013)Google Scholar

Norton Rose Fulbright, ‘The Singapore Mediation Convention: An Update on Developments in Enforcing Mediated Settlement Agreements’ (September 2019) <www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/b5906716/the-singapore-mediation-convention> accessed 14 August 2020+accessed+14+August+2020>Google Scholar

Nottage, L, ‘Arb-med in Australia: The Time Has Come’ (2007) 5 ADR Reporter 8Google Scholar

Nottage, L ‘Arb-med and New International Commercial Mediation Rules in Japan’ (University of Sydney, 21 July 2009) <https://japaneselaw.sydney.edu.au/2009/07/arb-med-and-new-international-commercial-mediation-rules-in-japan/> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

Nottage, L ‘Top 20 Things to Change in or around Australia’s International Arbitration Act’ (2010) 6 Asian International Arbitration Journal 1Google Scholar

Nottage, L ‘International Commercial Arbitration in Australia: What’s New and What’s Not’ (2013) 30 Journal of International Arbitration 465Google Scholar

Nottage, L and Garnett, R (eds), International Arbitration in Australia (Federation Press 2010)Google Scholar

Nottage, L and Garnett, R, ‘The Top 20 Things to Change in or around Australia’s International Arbitration Act’ in Nottage, L and Garnett, R (eds), International Arbitration in Australia (The Federation Press 2010)Google Scholar

Oberman, S, ‘Confidentiality in Mediation: An Application of the Right to Privacy’ (2012) 27 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 539Google Scholar

OECD, ‘The Belt and Road Initiative in the Global Trade, Investment and Finance Landscape’ in OECD, ‘OECD Business and Finance Outlook 2018’ (2018) <https://doi.org/10.1787/bus_fin_out-2018-6-en> accessed 23 September 2020+accessed+23+September+2020>Google Scholar

Oghigian, H, ‘The Mediation/Arbitration Hybrid Concept in Dispute Resolution (Med/arb)’ (30 July 2019) <https://journal.arbitration.ru/analytics/the-mediation-arbitration-hybrid-concept-in-dispute-resolution-med-arb-/> accessed 1 October 2020+accessed+1+October+2020>Google Scholar

Onyema, E, ‘The Use of Med-arb in International Commercial Dispute Resolution’ (2001) 12 American Review of International Arbitration 411Google Scholar

Palmer, M, ‘Formalisation of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes: Some Socio-legal Thoughts’ in Zekoll, J, Bälz, M and Amelung, I (eds), Formalisation and Flexibilisation in Dispute Resolution (Brill 2014)Google Scholar

Pappas, BA, ‘Med-arb and the Legalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution’ (2015) 20 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 157Google Scholar

Pappas, VFL and Vlavianos, GM, ‘Multiple Tiers, Multiple Risks – Multi-tier Dispute Resolution Clauses’ (2018) 12(1) Dispute Resolution International 5Google Scholar

Parfait, D, ‘L’article 10 du Traité de l’OHADA: quelle portée abrogatoire et supranationale?’ (2007) 12(2) Revue de droit uniforme 265Google Scholar

Park, J, Minsa jojeong jedo ui ipbeopjeok gaeseon bangan [Legislative Policy for the Improvement of Civil Conciliation] (2017) NARS Issue Report 310, Publication Registration No 31–9735020–000632–14 (National Assembly Research Service 2017)Google Scholar

Park, WW, ‘Arbitration in Banking and Finance’ (1998) 17 Annual Review of Banking Law 213Google Scholar

Pasas, G, ‘The Arbitrator as Mediator: Ku-ring-gai Council v Ichor Constructions Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 610’ (2019) 29 Australian Dispute Resolution Journal 266Google Scholar

Peter, JT, ‘Med-arb in International Arbitration’ (1997) 8(1) American Review of International Arbitration 83Google Scholar

Petersen, CJ, Fong, J and Rush, G, Enforcing Equal Opportunities: Investigation and Conciliation of Discrimination Complaints in Hong Kong (Centre for Comparative and Public Law, University of Hong Kong 2003)Google Scholar

Phang, A, ‘Mediation and the Courts – The Singapore Experience’ [2017] Asian Journal of Mediation 14Google Scholar

Phillips, FP, ‘The European Directive on Commercial Mediation: What It Provides and What It Doesn’t’ (Business Conflict Management) <www.businessconflictmanagement.com/pdf/BCMpress_EUDirective.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Polster, DA, ‘The Trial Judge as Mediator: A Rejoinder to Judge Cratsley’ (Mediate.com, March 2007) <www.mediate.com/articles/polsterD1.cfm/#4> accessed 20 August 2018+accessed+20+August+2018>Google Scholar

Prause, M, ‘A Methodology for the Determination of the MRI (Mediation Receptivity Index)’ (2007) 22 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 610Google Scholar

Province of Saskatchewan Ministry of Justice and Attorney General, ‘Annual Report (2007–2008)’ <http://publications.gov.sk.ca/documents/9/33067-JAG-07-08.pdf> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Pryles, M, ‘Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses’ (2001) 18 Journal of International Arbitration 159Google Scholar

Pryles, M and Taylor, VL, ‘The Cultures of Dispute Resolution in Asia’, in Pryles, M (ed), Dispute Resolution in Asia (3rd edn, Kluwer Law International 2006)Google Scholar

Pusceddu, P, ‘PRIME Finance Arbitration – A Lighthouse Safe Harbour in the Mare Magnum of Financial Dispute Resolution’ (2014) 3(1) Indian Journal of Arbitration Law 45Google Scholar

Queen Mary University of London and PricewaterhouseCoopers, ‘International Arbitration: Corporate Attitudes and Practices’ (2008) <www.pwc.co.uk/assets/pdf/pwc-international-arbitration-2008.pdf> accessed 24 September 2020+accessed+24+September+2020>Google Scholar

Queen Mary University of London and White & Case LLP, ‘2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration’ <www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2015_International_Arbitration_Survey.pdf> accessed 2 April 2021+accessed+2+April+2021>Google Scholar

Queen Mary University of London and White & Case LLP, ‘2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration’ <www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey-report.pdf> accessed 2 February 2020+accessed+2+February+2020>Google Scholar

Queirolo, I, Carpaneto, L and Dominelli, S, ‘Italy’ in Esplugues, C, Buhigues, JLI and Moreno, GP (eds), Civil and Commercial Mediation in Europe (Volume I: National Mediation Rules and Procedures) (Intersentia 2012)Google Scholar

Quek Anderson, D, ‘Mandatory Mediation: An Oxymoron? Examining the Feasibility of Implementing a Court-Mandated Mediation Program’ (2010) 11(2) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 479Google Scholar

Quek Anderson, D ‘Comment: A Coming of Age for Mediation in Singapore? Mediation Act 2016’ (2017) 29 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 275Google Scholar

Quek Anderson, D and Seah, CL, ‘Finding the Appropriate Mode of Dispute Resolution: Introducing Neutral Evaluation in Subordinate Courts’ (2011) Law Gazette 21Google Scholar

Quigley, J, Sharp, G and Souter, J, ‘“Action” to Justice: Addressing Access to Justice in the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench’ (University of Saskatchewan, College of Law, February 2016) <https://law.usask.ca/documents/research/deans-forum/13_SuperiorCourtandCourtProcesses_PolicyDiscusionPaper_2016DeansForum.pdf> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Rajah, VK, ‘W(h)ither Adversarial Commercial Dispute Resolution?’ (2017) 33 Arbitration International 17Google Scholar

Redfern, A and Hunter, M, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, Sweet & Maxwell 1999)Google Scholar

Reyes, A (ed), Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Hart 2019)Google Scholar

Reyes, A, ‘Recourse against Awards, Applications to Resist Enforcement and Tactical Considerations: Some Lessons from Singapore and Hong Kong Law’ (2020) 63 Japanese Yearbook of International Law 127Google Scholar

Riskin, LL, ‘Understanding Mediators’ Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed’ (1996) 1 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 7Google Scholar

Robinson, P and others, ‘The Emergence of Mediation in Korean Communities’ (2015) 15 Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 518Google Scholar

Roth, M and Gherdane, D, ‘Mediation in Austria: The European Pioneer in Mediation Law and Practice’ in Hopt, KJ and Steffek, F (eds), Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Saint-Martin, CC, ‘Arb-med-arb Service in Singapore International Mediation Centre: A Hotfix to the Pitfalls of Multi-tiered Clauses’ [2015] Asian Journal of Mediation 35Google Scholar

Salehijam, M, ‘Challenges of Mediation – The Need to Address the English Approach to Agreements to Mediate’ (Courts and Tribunals Judiciary) <www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/challenges-of-commercial-mediation-maryam-salehijam-cjc-adr.pdf> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

Salehijam, M ‘Enforceability of ADR Agreements: An Analysis of Selected EU Member States’ (2018) 21 International Trade Business Law Review 255Google Scholar

Sander, FEA, ‘Varieties of Dispute Processing’ (1976) 70 Federal Rules Decision 111Google Scholar

Sander, FEA ‘Developing the MRI (Mediation Receptivity Index)’ (2007) 22(3) Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 599Google Scholar

Sander, FEA and Goldberg, SB, ‘Fitting the Forum to the Fuss: A User-Friendly Guide to Selecting an ADR Procedure’ (1994) 10 Negotiation Journal 49Google Scholar

Sanders, P, Quo Vadis Arbitration? Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice: A Comparative Study (Kluwer Law International 1999)Google Scholar

Sanderson, C, ‘South Korea Averts Treaty Claim over Island Resort’ (Global Arbitration Review, 9 July 2020) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1228592/south-korea-averts-treaty-claim-over-island-resort> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

Sato, Y, Commercial Dispute Processing and Japan (Kluwer Law International 2001)Google Scholar

Sawadogo, FM, ‘Les 20 ans de l’Organisation pour l’harmonisation en Afrique du droit des affaires (OHADA): bilan et perspectives’ in Cadiet, L (ed), Droit et attractivité économique: le cas de l’OHSADA (IRJS 2013)Google Scholar

Sawyer, DC, ‘Revising the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: Seeking Procedural Due Process under the 2010 UNCITRAL Rules for Arbitration’ (2011) 1 International Commercial Arbitration Brief 24Google Scholar

Scanlon, KM, Drafting Dispute Resolution Clauses: Better Solutions for Business (International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution 2006)Google Scholar

Scherpe, JM and Marten, B, ‘Mediation in England and Wales: Regulation and Practice’ in Hopt, KJ and Steffek, F (eds), Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Schnabel, T, ‘The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Framework for the Cross-Border Recognition and Enforcement of Mediated Settlements’ (2019) 19 Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Schneider, ME, ‘Combining Arbitration with Conciliation’ (1998) 8 ICCA Congress Series 57Google Scholar

Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, ‘Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Arbitration Rules’ (2015) <http://shiac.org/upload/day_141230/SHIAC_ARBITRATION_RULES_2015_141222.pdf> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

Shen, K-L, ‘Current Situation and Developments of Out-of-Court Dispute Resolution in Taiwan: Focus on Court-Annexed Mediation’ in Yeh, J-R (ed), East Asian Courts under Transformation: Changing Judicial Functions in Leading Cases (National Taiwan University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Shen, K-L ‘Mediation in Taiwan: Present Situation and Future Development’ in Esplugues, C and Marquis, L (eds), New Developments in Civil and Commercial Mediation (Springer 2015)Google Scholar

Shen, K-L and Chen, Y-L, ‘Arbitration, Procedural Choice, and Rights of Litigation: Issues about Mandatory Arbitration of Government Procurement Act Article 85–1 Paragraph 1’ [2008] Taiwan Law Review 218Google Scholar

Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration, ‘Shenzhen guoji zhongcai yuan zhongcai guize’ [Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration Rules] (2016) <http://sccietac.org/index.php/Home/index/rule/id/798.html> accessed 17 August 2020+accessed+17+August+2020>Google Scholar

Shoji Homu Kenkyukai [Japan Institute of Business Law], ‘Chusai Hosei no Minaoshi wo Chushin to shita Kenkyukai Hokokusho’ [Report of the Working Group on Amendments of the Arbitration Act etc] (Japan Institute of Business Law 2020) <www.shojihomu.or.jp/> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

Shusuke, K, ‘Relationship between Family Mediation and Family Litigation’ [2010] Jurist 58Google Scholar

Silvestri, E, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union: An Overview’ [2012] Herald of Civil Procedure 166Google Scholar

Silvestri, E ‘The Singapore Convention on Mediated Settlement Agreements: A New String to the Bow of International Mediation’ (2019) 2 Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 5Google Scholar

Singapore International Arbitration Centre, ‘SIAC Rules 2016’ <https://siac.org.sg/our-rules/rules/siac-rules-2016> accessed 16 August 2020+accessed+16+August+2020>Google Scholar

Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy (SIDRA), ‘International Dispute Resolution Survey: 2020 Final Report’ (Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy) <https://sidra.smu.edu.sg/sites/sidra.smu.edu.sg/files/survey/index.html> accessed 5 October 2020+accessed+5+October+2020>Google Scholar

Singapore International Mediation Centre, ‘Mediation Rules’ <http://simc.com.sg/mediation-rules/> accessed 25 October 2018+accessed+25+October+2018>Google Scholar

Singapore International Mediation Centre ‘SIAC-SIMC Arb-Med-Arb Protocol’ <http://simc.com.sg/v2/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/SIAC-SIMC-AMA-Protocol.pdf> accessed 2 February 2020+accessed+2+February+2020>Google Scholar

Singer, LR, ‘The Quiet Revolution in Dispute Settlement’ (1989) 7 Mediation Quarterly 105Google Scholar

Sita, NYM, ‘Le ntumbu ou le kibaku: vers une théorie formelle du contrôle social’ (Thèse de doctorat en criminologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1989)Google Scholar

Sneddon, L and Lees, A, ‘Frequently Asked Questions: Is My Tiered Dispute Resolution Clause Binding?’ (Ashurst, 1 February 2013) <www.ashurst.com/en/news-and-insights/legal-updates/frequently-asked-questions-is-my-tiered-dispute-resolution-clause-binding/> accessed 14 November 2020+accessed+14+November+2020>Google Scholar

Soo, G, Zhao, Y and Cai, D, ‘Better Ways of Resolving Disputes in Hong Kong – Some Insights from the Lehman-Brothers Related Investment Product Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Scheme’ (2010) 9(1) Journal of International Business & Law 137Google Scholar

Spencer, D and Brogan, M, Mediation Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press 2007)Google Scholar

Steele, BL, ‘Enforcing International Commercial Mediation Agreements as Arbitral Awards’ (2006–07) 54 ULCA Law Review 1385Google Scholar

Stein, P, Legal Institutions: The Development of Dispute Settlement (Butterworths 1984)Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ, ‘Of “Procedural Arbitrability”: The Effect of Noncompliance with Contract Claims Procedures’ (1989) 40 South Carolina Law Review 847Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ ‘The Multi-door Contract and Other Possibilities’ (1997) 13 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 303Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ ‘The Arbitration Penumbra: Arbitration Law and the Rapidly Changing Landscape of Dispute Resolution’ (2007) 8 Nevada Law Journal 427Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ ‘Arbitration and Choice: Taking Charge of the “New Litigation”’ (2009) 7 DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal 383Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ ‘Arbitration: The “New Litigation”’ [2010] University of Illinois Law Review 1Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ ‘Managing Construction Conflict: Unfinished Revolution, Continuing Evolution’ (2014) 34(4) Construction Law 13Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ ‘Reflections on the State and Future of Commercial Arbitration: Challenges, Opportunities, Proposals’ (2014) 25 American Review of International Arbitration 297 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2519084> accessed 1 September 2020Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ ‘Beyond Getting to Yes: Using Mediator Insights to Facilitate Long-Term Business Relationships’ (2016) 34(7) Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 97Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ ‘Insights on Mediator Practices and Perceptions’ [2016] Dispute Resolution Magazine 4 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2759982> accessed 1 September 2020Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ ‘Living the Dream of ADR: Reflections on Four Decades of the Quiet Revolution in Dispute Resolution’ (2017) 18 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 513 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2920848> accessed 1 September 2020Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ ‘Arbitration, Mediation and Mixed Modes: Seeking Workable Solutions and Common Ground on Med-arb, Arb-med and Settlement-Oriented Activities by Arbitrators’ (2021) 26 Harvard Negotiation Law Review (forthcoming) <http://ssrn.com/abstract=3689389> accessed 1 September 2020Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ and Fraser, V, ‘The International Task Force on Mixed Mode Dispute Resolution: Exploring the Interplay between Mediation, Evaluation and Arbitration in Commercial Cases’ (2017) 40(3) Fordham International Law Review 839 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2920785> accessed 1 September 2020Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ and Fraser, V and Kaskell, P (eds), Commercial Arbitration at Its Best: Successful Strategies for Business Users (ABA Book Publishing 2001) 5–6.Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ and Fraser, V and Lamare, JR, ‘Living with ADR: Evolving Perceptions and Use of Mediation, Arbitration and Conflict Management in Fortune 1,000 Corporations’ (2014) 19 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 1 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2221471> accessed 1 September 2020Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ and Fraser, V and Lamare, JR and others, ‘East Meets West: An International Dialogue on Mediation and Med-arb in the United States and China’ (2009) 9(2) Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 395Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ and Fraser, V and Lamare, JR and Ulrich, ZP, ‘Arbitration in Evolution: Current Practices and Perspectives of Experienced Commercial Arbitrators’ (2014) 25 American Review of International Arbitration 395Google Scholar

Stipanowich, TJ and Fraser, V and Lamare, JR and Ulrich, ZP and Ulrich, ZP, ‘Commercial Arbitration and Settlement: Empirical Insights into the Roles Arbitrators Play’ (2014) 6 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation 1 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2461839> accessed 1 September 2020Google Scholar

Storskrubb, E, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in the EU: Regulatory Challenges’ (2016) 24 European Review of Private Law 1Google Scholar

Sun, W, ‘Singapore Mediation Convention – Harmonization of China’s Legal System with the Convention: Suggestions for the Implementation of the Convention in China’ (Kluwer Mediation Blog, 2 March 2019) <http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/03/02/singapore-mediation-convention-harmonization-of-chinas-legal-system-with-the-convention-suggestions-for-the-implementation-of-the-convention-in-china/> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

Supreme People’s Court, ‘Notice on the Determination of the First International Commercial Arbitration and Mediation Agencies Incorporated into the “One-Stop” International Commercial Disputes Diversification Mechanism’ <http://cicc.court.gov.cn/html/1/218/149/192/1124.html> accessed 25 August 2020+accessed+25+August+2020>Google Scholar

Sussman, E, ‘Developing an Effective Med-arb/Arb-med Process [2009] 2(1) New York Dispute Resolution Law 71Google Scholar

Sussman, E and Kummer, VA, ‘Drafting the Arbitration Clause: A Primer on the Opportunities and the Pitfalls’ (2012) 67(1) Dispute Resolution Journal 30Google Scholar

Sutton, DSJ, Gill, J and Gearing, M (eds), Russell on Arbitration (24th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2015)Google Scholar

Suzuki, C, ‘Gaikoku no Hishosaiban no Shonin, Torikesi, Henko’ [Recognition, Revocation and Alteration of Foreign Decisions in Non-contentious Matters] (1974) 26(9) Hoso Jiho 1489Google Scholar

Svatos, M, ‘The UNCITRAL Draft Convention on the Enforcement of Mediated Settlement Agreements: The Dawn of Cross-Border Mediation?’ (2017) <http://forarb.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Georgetown-mediation.pdf> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Swiss Chambers of Commerce Association for Arbitration and Mediation, Swiss Rules of Mediation (2019) <www.swissarbitration.org/files/838/Swiss%20Rules%202019/Web%20versions%202019/Mediation%20Web%202019/mediation_2019_webversion_englisch.pdf> accessed 1 March 2020+accessed+1+March+2020>Google Scholar

Tai, M, Copeman, J and Phillips, A, ‘Mediating Commercial Disputes: A Call to Action in Hong Kong’ [2017] Asian Dispute Review 72Google Scholar

Taiti, K and Kazuyuki, T (eds), Family Dispute Procedures (2nd edn, Yuhikaku Publishing 2007)Google Scholar

Takada, H, ‘Article 200’ in Suzuki, M and Aoyama, Y (eds), Chushaku Minji Soshoho [Commentary of the Code of Civil Procedure], vol 4 (Yuhikaku 1997)Google Scholar

Takeshi, K and Takashi, I, ‘Chusai Tetsuzuki to Wakai & Chotei’ [Arbitration Procedure and Settlement & Mediation] in Matsuura, K and Aoyama, Y (eds), Gendai Chusaiho no Ronten [Issues of Modern Arbitration Law] (Yuhikaku 1998)Google Scholar

Takeshita, M, ‘Article 200’ in Kaneko, Hajime and others (eds), Jokai Minji Soshoho [Commentary of the Code of Civil Procedure] (2nd edn, Kobundo 2011)Google Scholar

Tan, P and Tan, K, ‘Kinks in the SIAC-SIMC Arb-Med-Arb Protocol’ (Law Gazette, January 2018) <https://lawgazette.com.sg/feature/kinks-in-the-siac-simc-arb-med-arb-protocol/> accessed 14 August 2020+accessed+14+August+2020>Google Scholar

Tang, H and others, ‘Supreme People’s Court Issues Rules of Procedure for the China International Commercial Courts’ (Herbert Smith Freehills, 7 December 2018) <https://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/2018/12/07/supreme-peoples-court-issues-rules-of-procedure-for-the-china-international-commercial-courts/> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

Tang, H, ‘Is There an Expanding Culture that Favors Combining Arbitration with Conciliation or Other ADR Procedures?’ (1998) 8 ICCA Congress Series 101Google Scholar

Tchakoua, J-M, ‘Le statut de la sentence arbitrale d’accord parties: les limites d’un déguisement bien utile’ (2002) 7 International Business Law Journal 775Google Scholar

Teh, L, ‘Singapore’ in Acomb, FA and others (eds), Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses (IBA Litigation Committee 2015)Google Scholar

Teramura, N, Ex Aequo et Bono as a Response to the ‘Over-Judicialisation’ of International Commercial Arbitration (Wolters Kluwer 2020)Google Scholar

Tevendale, C, Ambrose, H and Naish, V, ‘Multi-tier Dispute Resolution Clauses and Arbitration’ (2015) 1 Turkish Commercial Law Review 31Google Scholar

Thompson, PN, ‘Good Faith Mediation in the Federal Courts’ (2011) 26 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 363Google Scholar

Titi, C and Fach Gómez, K, Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford University Press 2019)Google Scholar

Tomasich, L, Morgan, E and Firestone, S, ‘Two Hats, or Not Two Hats?’ (ADR Institute of Canada, 17 December 2019) <http://adric.ca/adr-perspectives/two-hats-or-not-two-hats> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

Tomic, K, ‘Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses: Benefits and Drawbacks’ [2017] Journal of Legal and Social Studies in South East Europe 360Google Scholar

Toru, K, Saibangai Funso Kaiketsu Sokushinho [Act on Promotion of ADR] (Shoji Homu 2005)Google Scholar

Trakman, L and Sharma, K, ‘The Binding Force of Agreements to Negotiate in Good Faith’ (2014) 73 Cambridge Law Journal 598Google Scholar

Trenczek, T, ‘Stand Und Zukunft Der Mediation – Konfliktvermittlung In Australien Und Deutschland’ (2008) <https://waage-hannover.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/SchiedVZ_Trenczek_Stand_und_Zukunft_Mediation-Mskr2008.pdf> accessed 11 September 2020+accessed+11+September+2020>Google Scholar

Tsiattalou, B, ‘Understanding FCA’s Ban on Speculative Mini-Bonds’ Financial Times (London, 5 December 2019) <www.ftadviser.com/investments/2019/12/05/understanding-fca-s-ban-on-speculative-mini-bonds/> accessed 7 September 2020+accessed+7+September+2020>Google Scholar

Uchibori, K, ADR Ho Gaisetsu to Q&A [Commentary of the ADR Act and Q&A] (Bessatsu NBL No 101) (Shoji Homu 2005)Google Scholar

Ueda, T, ‘Chotei Zenchi no Goi ha Shokyokuteki Soshoyoken ni naruka’ [Does an Agreement to Mediate Precedent to Litigation Constitute a Negative Procedural Requirement?] (2012) 690 Hogaku Seminar 144Google Scholar

Uniform Law Conference of Canada, ‘Uniform Arbitration Act (2016)’ (1 December 2016) <www.ulcc.ca/images/stories/2016_pdf_en/2016ulcc0017.pdf> accessed 10 September 2020+accessed+10+September+2020>Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, Guide to Enactment and Use of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation (2002)Google Scholar

United Nations Secretariat Statistical Division, Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use, Series M no 49 <https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/> accessed 14 August 2020+accessed+14+August+2020>Google Scholar

Utterback, M, Li, R and Blackwell, H, ‘Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in China – A Review of the Past Twenty Years’ (King & Wood Mallesons, 15 March 2016) <www.kwm.com/en/knowledge/insights/enforcing-foreign-arbitral-awards-in-china-20160915> accessed 26 February 2020+accessed+26+February+2020>Google Scholar

Vlavianos, GM and Pappas, VFL, ‘Multi-tier Dispute Resolution Clauses as Jurisdictional Conditions Precedent to Arbitration’ in Rowley, JW, Bishop, D and Kaiser, G (eds), The Guide to Energy Arbitrations (2nd edn, Law Business Research 2017)Google Scholar

Wagner, GG, ‘Sicherung der Vertraulichkeit von Mediationsverfahren durch Vertrag’ [2001] Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1399Google Scholar

Wang, G, ‘Mediation in the Globalised Business Environment’ (2009) 17(2) Asia Pacific Law Review 47Google Scholar

Wang, G Dispute Resolution Mechanism for the Belt and Road Initiative (Zhejiang University Press 2017)Google Scholar

Wang, T, See You in Court: Transformation of Taiwanese Conception of Justice During the Japanese Rule (National Taiwan University Press 2017)Google Scholar

Weisman, MC, ‘Med-arb: The Best of Both Worlds’ (2013) 19 Dispute Resolution Magazine 40Google Scholar

Wellington, A, ‘“Exquisite Examples” of Creative Judicial Dispute Resolution: The Potential of Alternative Dispute Resolution for Intellectual Property Cases’ (2011) 23 Intellectual Property Journal 289Google Scholar

Wendland, M, Mediation Und Zivilprozess: Dogmatische Grundlagen einer Allegemeinen Konfliktbehandlungslehre (Mohr Siebeck 2018)Google Scholar

White, A and Kim, S, ‘Early Resolution of Disputes in Korea: Negotiation, Mediation, and Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution’ (2017) 15 Dispute Resolution Journal 16Google Scholar

Winship, P, ‘Law and Development in West and Central Africa (OHADA)’ (2016) SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No 272Google Scholar

Wolski, B, ‘ARB-MED-ARB (and MSAs): A Whole Which Is Less Than, Not Greater Than, the Sum of Its Parts’ (2013) 6(2) Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 249Google Scholar

Wolski, B ‘Re-assessment of QCAT’s Hybrid Hearing and Arb-med-arb under Section 27D of the Commercial Arbitration Act’ (2014) 3 Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice 156Google Scholar

Wright, K and others, ‘Parental Experiences of Dealing with Disputes in Additional Support Needs in Scotland: Why Are Parents Not Engaging with Mediation?’ (2012) 16 International Journal of Inclusive Education 1099Google Scholar

Yamada, A, ‘Minkan-gata ADR no Riyo to Sosho Tetsuzuki no Kankei’ [Use of Private Mediation and Its Relationship to Litigation] in Toyoda, Y and others (eds), Wakai wa Mirai wo Tsukuru: Kusano Yoshiro Sensei Koki Kinen [Settlements Make Future: Liber Amicorum Yoshiro Kusano for His 70th Birthday] (Shinzansha 2018)Google Scholar

Yamamoto, K, ‘Article 118’ in Kikui, T and Muramatsu, T (eds), Konmentaru Minji Soshoho [Commentary of the Code of Civil Procedure], vol 2 (2nd edn, Nihon Hyoronsha 2006)Google Scholar

Yamamoto, K ‘ADR no Igi, Enkaku, Tenbo’ [Significance, History and Perspectives of ADR] in Japan Association of the Law of Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and Meiji University Law School (eds), ADR no Jissai to Tenbo [Practice and Perspectives of ADR] (Journal of Japanese Arbitration and ADR) (Shoji Homu 2014)Google Scholar

Yamamoto, K ‘ADR Goi no Koryoku – Soken Seigen Goi nit suite no Jakkan no Kento’ [Effects of ADR Agreements – Some Considerations on Agreements Limiting Right of Access to the Courts] in ADR Hosei no Gendaiteki Kadai [Legal Framework of ADR and Its Modern Challenges] (Yuhikaku 2018)Google Scholar

Yamamoto, K and Yamada, A, ADR Chûsaihô [Law of ADR and Arbitration] (2nd edn, Nihon Hyôronsha/Yuhikaku 2015)Google Scholar

Yip, M, ‘The Singapore International Commercial Court: The Future of Litigation?’ in Kramer, X and Sorabji, J (eds), International Business Courts: A European and Global Perspective (Eleven International 2019)Google Scholar

Zhang, X, ‘Rethinking the Mediation Campaign’ (2015) 10(2) Journal of Comparative Law 45Google Scholar

Zhu, W, ‘Some Considerations on the Civil, Commercial and Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanisms between China and the Other Belt and Road Countries’ in Chaisse, J and Górski, J (eds), The Belt and Road Initiative: Law, Economics, and Politics (Brill 2018)Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive