Book contents
- Measuring Compliance
- Measuring Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Measuring Compliance: The Challenges in Assessing and Understanding the Interaction between Law and Organizational Misconduct
- Part 1 The Compliance Industry, the State, and Measurement Needs
- Part 2 Quantitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance
- Part 3 Qualitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance
- 11 Engaging Qualitative Research Approaches to Investigate Compliance Motivations: Understanding the How and Why of Compliance
- 12 Admitting Noncompliance: Interview Strategies for Assessing Undetected Legal Deviance
- 13 Compliance Ethnography: What Gets Lost in Compliance Measurement
- Part 4 Mixed Methods and Building on Existing Compliance Research
- Index
- References
13 - Compliance Ethnography: What Gets Lost in Compliance Measurement
from Part 3 - Qualitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2022
- Measuring Compliance
- Measuring Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Measuring Compliance: The Challenges in Assessing and Understanding the Interaction between Law and Organizational Misconduct
- Part 1 The Compliance Industry, the State, and Measurement Needs
- Part 2 Quantitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance
- Part 3 Qualitative Approaches to Measuring Corporate Compliance
- 11 Engaging Qualitative Research Approaches to Investigate Compliance Motivations: Understanding the How and Why of Compliance
- 12 Admitting Noncompliance: Interview Strategies for Assessing Undetected Legal Deviance
- 13 Compliance Ethnography: What Gets Lost in Compliance Measurement
- Part 4 Mixed Methods and Building on Existing Compliance Research
- Index
- References
Summary
Abstract: Drawing on data from two ethnographies on organizational compliance in China, this chapter offers three important insights about what gets lost in traditional quantitative measures of organizational compliance. First, the studies show that compliance is muddled. A close-up view of the actual business responses to the law are hard to capture in binary or numerical terms (or even in more nuanced labeling such as motivational postures or levels of commitment); in everyday practice there are many instances of both rule-obeying and rule-violating behavior. Second, compliance is dynamic and varies at different points in time and in their situational contexts. Third, the studies show that compliance can be a nonlinear process in which compliance occurs even when there is no chain of transmission from governmental regulators to compliance managers to individual workers. The chapter draws out what these insights mean for the study and practice of compliance measurement. Ultimately, there is a strong need for multi-method research that combines understanding complexity through in-depth case studies (combining participant observation with interviews) alongside statistical analysis in quantitative work.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Measuring ComplianceAssessing Corporate Crime and Misconduct Prevention, pp. 218 - 238Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022