Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:02:49.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reference List

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2009

Estrid Sørensen
Estrid Sørensen
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Materiality of Learning
Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice
 , pp. 195 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W.; Frenkel-Brunswick, Else; Levinson, Daniel J.; and Sanford, Newitt. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Agalianos, Angelos; Whitty, Geoff; and Noss, Richard. 2006. “The Social Shaping of Logo,” Social Studies of Science 16, 2: 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akrich, Madeleine. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects,” in Bijker, Wiebe E., and Law, John (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses: Notes Towards an Investigation,” in Althusser, Louis, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: NLB, pp. 123–173.Google Scholar
Amit, Vered (ed.). 2000. Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World. New York: Routledge.CrossRef
Asplund, Johan. 1985. Tid, rum, individ och kollektiv [Time, Space, Individual and Collective]. Stockholm: Liber Förlag.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barab, Sasha, and Plucker, Jonathan A. 2002. “Smart People or Smart Contexts? Cognition, Ability, and Talent Development in an Age of Situated Approaches to Knowing and Learning,” Educational Psychologist 37, 3: 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barab, Sasha; Sadler, Troy D.; Heiselt, Conan; Hickey, Daniel; and Zuiker, Steven. 2006. “Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play,” Journal of Science Education and Technology 16, 1: 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen. 1998. “Getting Real: Technoscientific Practices and the Materialization of Reality,” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 10, 2: 87–128.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Andrew. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Bingham, Nick, and Thrift, Nigel. 2000. “Some New Instructions for Travellers: The Geography of Bruno Latour and Michel Serres,” in Crang, Mike, and Thrift, Nigel (eds.) Thinking Space. London: Routledge, pp. 281–301.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Sally. 2002. Literature Review for the Evaluation of the Digital Opportunities Projects. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Brewster, Maria. 2001. Supermanual: The Incomplete Guide to the Superchannel. Liverpool: Foundation for Art and Creative Technology.Google Scholar
Brown, Steven D., and Capdevilla, Rose. 1999. “Perpetuum Mobile: Substance, Force and the Sociology of Translation,” in Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 26–50.Google Scholar
Buckingham, David. 2000. After the Death of Childhood: Growing Up in the Age of Electronic Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that Matter – on the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories of Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen at St. Brieuc Bay,” in Law, John (ed.) Power, Action and Belief. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul, pp. 196–233.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. London: Blackwell Publishers/Sociological Review.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel, and Law, John. 1997. “After the Individual in Society: Lessons on Collectivity from Science, Technology and Society,” Canadian Journal of Sociology 22: 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Edward S. 1998. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Pia H., and James, Allison. 2000. Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Adele E. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, and New Dehli: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Michael. 1996. Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Colley, Helen; Hodkinson, Paul; and Malcom, Janice. 2002. Non-Formal Learning: Mapping the Conceptual Terrain: A Consultation Report. Leeds: University of Leeds Lifelong Learning Institute.Google Scholar
Coninck-Smith, Ning, and Gutman, Marta. 2004. “Children and Youth in Public,” Childhood 11, 2: 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crang, Mike, and Thrift, Nigel. (eds.) 2000. Thinking Space. London: Routledge.
Cuban, Larry. 1986. Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. Negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Despret, Vinciane. 2004a. Our Emotional Makeup. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
Despret, Vinciane. 2004b. “The Body We Care For: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis,” Body and Society [Special Issue on Bodies on Trial] 10, 2–3: 111–134.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1929. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1938. Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, Pierre. 2000. “Virtual Learning Environments.” Paper presented at the EUN Conference 2000, Geneva.
Dreier, Ole. 1993. Psykosocial Behandling – En teori om et praksisområde [Psycho-Social Treatment – A Theory of a Field of Practice]. Copenhagen: Dansk psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Dreier, Ole. 1999. “Personal Trajectories of Participation across Contexts of Social Practice,” Outlines – Critical Social Studies 1: 5–32.Google Scholar
Dreier, Ole. 2003. “Learning in Personal Trajectories of Participation,” in Stephenson, Niamh; Radtke, H. Lorraine; Jorna, Rene; and Stam, Henderikus J. (eds.) Theoretical Psychology: Critical Contributions. Concord: Captus University Publications, pp. 20–29.Google Scholar
Dreier, Ole. 2008. Psychotherapy in Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Druin, Allison, and Solomon, Cynthia. 1996. Designing Multimedia Environments for Children: Computers, Creativity, and Kids. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ejlskov, Morten W.; Jensen, Kenneth H.; Jensen, Tine; and Sørensen, Estrid. 2001. “Situmanual – Incomplete Guide to the Superchannel,” in ,FACT (ed.) Situmanual – Incomplete Guide to the Superchannel. Liverpool: FACT, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar
Elgaard Jensen, Torben. 2001. Performing Social Work – Competence, Orderings, Spaces and Objects. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Elgaard Jensen, Torben. 2007. “Witnessing the Future,” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 8, 1: Art. 1.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1994. The Interpretations of Dreams. New York: Modern Library Edition.Google Scholar
Gane, Nicholas, and Haraway, Donna. 2006. “When We Have Never Been Human, What Is to Be Done? Interview with Donna Haraway,” Theory, Culture & Society 23, 7–8: 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkle, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Glasersfeld, Ernst. 1985. “Reconstructing the Concept of Knowledge,” Archives de Psychologie 53: 91–101.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gomart, Emile. 2004. “Surprised by Methadone: In Praise of Drug Substitution Treatment in a French Clinic,” Body and Society [Special Issue on Bodies on Trial] 10, 2–3: 85–110.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1994. “Professional Vision,” American Anthropologist 96, 3: 606–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Peg, and Cole, Michael. 1984. “Current Activity for the Future: The Zoped,” in Rogoff, Barbara, and Wertsch, James (eds.) Children's Learning in the “Zone of Proximal Development.”San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2004. Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn, and Atkinson, Paul. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century,” in Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, pp. 149–182.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. Femaleman©_Meets_OncoMouse™. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hastrup, Kirsten, and Ovesen, Jan. 1985. Etnografisk grundbog: Metoder, teorier, resultater [Ethnographic primer: Methods, Theories, Results]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Hatch, Thomas, and Gardner, Howard. 1993. “Finding Cognition in the Classroom: An Expanded View of Human Intelligence,” in Salomon, Gavriel (ed.) Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–187.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Dixi Louise. 2003. ProjectWeb as Practice: On the Relevance of Radical Localism for Information Systems Development Research. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetscenter.Google Scholar
Hetherington, John, and Lee, Nick. 2000. “Social Order and the Blank Figure,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18, 2: 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, Jim. 2001. “From a Focus on Tasks to a Focus on Understanding: The Cultural Transformation of a Toronto Classroom,” in Koschmann, Timothy; Hall, Rogers P.; and Miyake, Naomi (eds.) CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation. Mahwah and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 11–42.Google Scholar
Hine, Christine. 2000. Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, Christine (ed.). 2005. Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg.
Hirschauer, Stefan. 2004. “Praktiken und ihre Körper: Über materielle Partizipanden des Tuns” [Concerning Material Participants of Doing], in Hörning, Karl H., and Reuther, Julia (eds.) Doing Culture: Neue Positionen zum Verhältnis von Kultur und sozialer Praxis. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 73–91.Google Scholar
Højrup, Thomas. 2003. State, Culture and Life-Modes: The Foundations of Life-Mode Analysis. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Holzkamp, Klaus. 1995. Lernen: Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung [Learning: A Subjectivity Research Foundation]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Hoppe, Ulrich H. 2007. “Educational Information Technologies and Collaborative Learning,” in Hoppe, Ulrich H.; Ogata, Hiroaki; and Soller, Amy (eds.) The Role of Technology in CSCL: Studies in Technology Enhanced Collaborative Learning. New York: Springer, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson-Smith, Andy. 2001. “30 Days in ActiveWorlds: Community, Design and Terrorism in a Virtual World,” in Schroeder, Ralph (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 77–89.Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas P. 1989. “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems,” in Bijker, Wiebe E.; Hughes, Thomas P.; and Pinch, Trevor J. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 51–82.Google Scholar
Hultqvist, Kenneth. 2001. “Bringing the Gods and the Angels Back? A Modern Pedagogical Saga about Excess in Moderation,” Hultqvist, Kenneth, and Dahlberg, Gunilla (eds.) Governing the Child in the New Millennium. New York: Routledge Falmer, pp. 143–171.Google Scholar
Hultqvist, Kenneth. 2004. “The Traveling State, the Nation and the Subject of Education,” in Baker, Bernadette M., and Heyning, Katharina E. (eds.) Dangerous Coagulations? The Uses of Foucault in the Study of Education. New York: Peter Lang: pp. 153–188.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2007. “Making Order: Law and Science in Action,” in Hackett, Edward J.; Amsterdamska, Olga; Lynch, Michael; and Wajcman, Judy (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 761–786.Google Scholar
Jensen, Casper, and Lauritsen, Peter. 2005. “Qualitative Research as Partial Connection: Bypassing the Power-Knowledge Nexus,” Qualitative Research 5, 1: 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Tine. 2005a. Thinking about Competence and Subjectivity in the Fifth Dimension: Working on the Boundaries of Virtuality and Subjectivity in and out of School. Roskilde: Roskilde University.Google Scholar
Jensen, Tine. 2005b. “When Faith and Good Will Is Not Enough: Researcher Positions in Interactive Research with School Children,” Annual Review of Critical Psychology 4, 4: 166–178.Google Scholar
Jensen, Tine; Jensen, Kenneth; and Morten, Jack. 2005. “Learning in Virtual and Physical Communities,” in Nocon, Honorine, and Nilsson, Monica (eds.) School of Tomorrow: Teaching and Technology in Local and Global Communities. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 87–130.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jim (aka Bruno Latour). 1995. “Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer,” in Star, Susan Leigh (ed.) Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 257–277.Google Scholar
Karsten, Lia. 2003. “Children's Use of Public Space: The Gendered World of the Playground,” Childhood 10, 4: 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaspersen, Lars Bo. 1995. Anthony Giddens – introduktion til en samfundsteoretiker [Anthony Giddens – Introduction to a Social Theorist]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Klette, Kirsti. 1998. “Introduksjon til klasseromsforskning som forskningsfelt” [Introduction to Classroom Research as a Research Field], in Klette, Kirsti (ed.) Klasseromsforskning – på norsk. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Preda, Alex. 2004. The Sociology of Financial Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koschmann, Timothy. 1996. CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Koschmann, Timothy;Hall, Rogers P.; and Miyake, Naomi (eds.). 2002. CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation. Mahwah and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laet, Marianne, and Mol, Annemarie. 2000. “The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology,” Social Studies of Science 30, 2: 225–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1990. “Drawing Things Together,” in Lynch, Michael, and Woolgar, Steve (eds.) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 19–68.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999a. “A Collective of Humans and Nonhumans,” in Pandora's Hope – Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 174–215.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999b. “Circulating References – Sampling the Soil in the Amazon Forest,” in Pandora's Hope – Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 24–79.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999c. “Do You Believe in Reality” in Pandora's Hope – Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999d. “On Recalling ANT,” in Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 15–25.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004a. “How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimensions of Science Studies,” Body and Society [Special Issue on Bodies on Trial] 10, 2–3: 205–229.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004b. “Scientific Objects and Legal Objectivity,” in Pottage, Alain, and Mundy, Martha (eds.) Law, Anthropology and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–113.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004c. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern,” Critical Inquiry 30: 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean. 1988. Cognition in Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Wenger, Etienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John. 1989. “Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion,” in Bijker, Wiebe E.; Hughes, Thomas P.; and Pinch, Trevor P. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111–134.Google Scholar
Law, John. 1999. “After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology,” in Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Law, John. 2002a. Aircraft Stories – Decentering the Object in Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John. 2002b. “Objects and Spaces,” Theory, Culture and Society 19, 5/6: 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John. 2004. After Methods – Mess in Social Science Research. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.). 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, John, and Mol, Annemarie. 2001. “Situating Technoscience: An Inquiry into Spatiality,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19: 609–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John, and Singleton, Vicky. 2005. “Object Lessons,” Organization 12, 3: 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leander, Kevin M. 2002. “Silencing in Classroom Interaction: Producing and Relating Social Spaces,” Discourse Processes 34, 2: 193–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Nick. 2001. Childhood and Society: Growing Up in an Age of Uncertainty. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Nick, and Brown, Steven D. 1994. “Otherness and the Actor Network – The Undiscovered Continent,” The American Behavioral Scientist 37, 6: 772–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lehtinen, Erno; Lipponen, Lasse; Hakkarainen, Kai; Rahikainen, Marjaana; and Muukkonen, Hanni. 2000. “Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: A Review,” in Jong, Frank; Simons, Robert-Jan; and Meijden, Henry (eds.) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning in Primary and Secondary Education: A Final Report for the European Commission. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Leontiev, Alexei Nikolajewitsch. 1978. Activity, Consciousness and Personality. New York and Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ligorio, Maria Beatrice, and Veen, Klaas. 2006. “Constructing a Successful Cross-National Virtual Learning Environment in Primary and Secondary Education,” Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal 14, 2: 103–128.Google Scholar
Lindblad, Sverker, and Sahlström, Fritjof. 1998. “Klasserumsforskning: En oversigt med fokus på interaktion og elever” [Classroom Research: An Overview with Focus on Interaction and Pupils], in Bjerg, Jens (ed.) Pædagogik – en grundbog til et fag. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag A/S, pp. 224–257.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 2002. Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft [The Educational System of Society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Magnus, P. D. 2007. “Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science,” Social Studies of Science 37, 2: 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marland, Michael. 1993. The Craft of the Classroom: A Survival Guide. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
McCormick, Robert M., and Paechter, Carrie. 1999. Learning and Knowledge. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1932. “The Objective Reality of Perspectives,” in The Philosophy of the Present. Chicago: Chicago University Press: pp. 161–175.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Medd, Will, and Marvin, Simon. 2007. “Making Water Work: Intermediating between Regional Strategy and Local Practice,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (Advance Online Publication), http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=d3205.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel, and Slater, Don. 2000. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Mol, Annemarie. 1999. “Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions,” in Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 74–89.Google Scholar
Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mol, Annemarie, and Law, John. 1994. “Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology,” Social Studies of Science 24: 641–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mørk, Sven. 1994. “Handlingsteorien” [The Action Theory], Udkast – Dansk tidskrift for Kritisk Samfundsvidenskab 22, 1: 3–47.Google Scholar
Newman, Fred, and Holzman, Lois. 1997. The End of Knowing: A New Developmental Way of Learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Klaus, and Kvale, Steinar. 1999. Mesterlære: Læring som Social Praksis [Apprenticeship: Learning as Social Practice]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Nocon, Honorine. 2005. “The Role of Network in the School of Tomorrow,” in Nocon, Honorine, and Nilsson, Monica (eds.) School of Tomorrow: Teaching and Technology in Local and Global Communities. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 131–166.Google Scholar
O'Day, Vicky; Bobrow, Daniel; Bobrow, Kimberly; Shirley, Mark; Hughes, Billie; and Walters, Jim. 1998. “Moving Practice: From Classrooms to MOO Rooms,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 7, 1–2: pp. 9–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,OECD. 2004. Learning for Tomorrow's World: First Results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Papert, Seymour. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Papert, Seymour. 1993. The Children's Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Philo, Chris. 2000. “Foucault's Geography,” in Crang, Mike, and Thrift, Nigel (eds.) Thinking Space. London: Routledge, pp. 205–238.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1972. “The Myth of the Sensory Origin of Scientific Knowledge,” in Pickering, Andrew (ed.) Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 45–62.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency & Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Quinn, Naomi. 1991. “The Culture Basis of Metaphor,” in Fernandez, James W. (ed.) Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Trope in Anthropology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 56–93.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Kim. 2004. “Places for Children – Children's Places,” Childhood 11, 2: 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Lise Bagge. 2006. Vejledning om disciplin, god adfærd og trivsel i folkeskolen – et inspirationshæfte [Guidance in Discipline, Good Behavior and Well-Being in Elementary School – an Inspiration Booklet]. Copenhagen: Undervisningsministerietsafdeling for grundskolen og folkeoplysning.Google Scholar
Rogoff, Barbara, and Wertsch, James. 1984. Children's Learning in the “Zone of Proximal Development.”San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Roth, Wolff-Michael. 1999. “Authentic School Science: Intellectual Traditions,” in McCormick, Robert M., and Paechter, Carrie (eds.) Learning and Knowledge. London: Open University Press, pp. 6–20.Google Scholar
Sabini, John. 1992. Social Psychology. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Salomon, Gavriel. 1993. Distributed Cognition – Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffer, Thomas. 2003. “The Duality of Mobilisation: Following the Rise and Fall of an Alibi-Story on Its Way to Court,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33, 3: 313–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Israel. 1999. “Epistemology and Education,” in McCormick, Robert M., and Paechter, Carrie (eds.) Learning and Knowledge. London: Open University Press, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Ralph; Huxor, Avon; and Smith, Andy. 2001. “Activeworlds: Geography and Social Interaction in Virtual Reality,” Futures 33: 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Steven. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shutkin, David. 1998. “The Deployment of Information Technology in the Field of Education and the Augmentation of the Child,” in Popkewitz, Thomas S., and Brennan, Marie (eds.) Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education. New York: Teachers College Press: pp. 205–230.Google Scholar
Simpson, Brenda. 2000. “The Body as a Site of Contestation in School,” in Prout, Alan (ed.) The Body, Childhood and Society. London: Macmillian Press, pp. 60–78.Google Scholar
Sismondo, Sergio. 2004. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Richard G. 2003. “Baudrillard's Nonrepresentational Theory: Burn the Signs and Journey without Maps,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21: 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, Estrid. 1998. “Computerspil – virkelighed eller fiktion?” [Computer Game – Reality or Fiction?], Nordisk Psykologi 50, 2: 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, Estrid. 2001. “Constituting Notions of Knowledge with Philosophy and Technology,” Outlines – Critical Social Studies 29, 1: 67–86.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Estrid. 2003. “From Research Result to Technological Development,” EU-report for Fifth Frame Program project “5D, Local Learning in a Global World.”
Sørensen, Estrid. 2005. “Lær af computerspil!” [Learn from Computer Games!], in Walther, Bo Kampmann, and Jessen, Carsten (eds.) Spillets verden. København: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitets Forlag, pp. 283–295.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Estrid. 2007. “The Time of Materiality,” Forum Qualitative Social Research 8, 1: Art. 2.Google Scholar
Spradley, James P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
St. Pierre, Elizabeth Adams. 1997. “Methodology in the Fold and the Irruption of Transgressive Data,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 10, 2: 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh. 1991. “Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions,” in Law, John (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 26–56.Google Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh. 2002. “Infrastructure and Ethnographic Practice: Working on the Fringes,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems [Special Issue on Ethnography and Intervention] 14, 2: 107–123.Google Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh, and Strauss, Anselm. 1999. “Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 8: 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Barbara. 2003. Superflex/Tools. Köln: Verlag der Buchhandling Walther König.Google Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle. 1997. Power and Invention: Situating Science. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle. 2000. The Invention of Modern Science. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1996. “Cutting the Network,” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2: 517–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy. 1999. “Working Relations of Technology Production and Use,” in MacKenzie, Donald, and Wajcman, Judz (eds.) The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press, pp. 258–268.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1985. Philosophy and the Human Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrift, Nigel. 1996. Spatial Formations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Thrift, Nigel. 2000. “Afterwords,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18: 213–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traweek, Sharon. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. 1997. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Turnbull, David. 1993. Maps Are Territories: Science Is an Atlas. Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
,Uni-C. 2007. Computere i Skolen [Computers in School]. Retrieved December 6, 2007, from http://cis.emi.dk.
,U.S. Census Bureau. 2007. Administrative and Customer Services Division, Statistical Compendia Branch, Table 248. Retrieved December 6, 2007, from http://www.census.gov.
Varenne, Hervé, and McDermott, Ray. 1998. “Introduction,” in Varenne, Hervé, and McDermott, Ray (eds.) Successful Failure. Oxford: Westview Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Verran, Helen. 1998. “Re-Imagining Land Ownership in Australia,” Postcolonial Studies 1, 2: 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verran, Helen. 1999. “Staying True to Laughter in Nigerian Classrooms,” in Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 136–155.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society – The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warschauer, Mark. 1998. “Online Learning in Sociocultural Context,” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 29, 1: 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Webster's New World Dictionary, and ,Thesaurus (Version 1.0). 1997. Accent Software International/Macmillan Publishers.
Winthereik, Brit Ross; Bont, Antoniette; and Berg, Marc. 2002. “Accessing the World of Doctors and Their Computers: ‘Making Available’ Objects of Study and the Research Site through Ethnographic Engagement,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems [Special Issue on Ethnography and Intervention] 14, 2: 47–58.Google Scholar
Winthereik, Brit Ross, and Vikkelsø, Signe. 2005. “ICT and Integrated Care: Some Dilemmas of Standardising Inter-Organisational Communication,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 14, 1: 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Reference List
  • Estrid Sørensen, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Book: The Materiality of Learning
  • Online publication: 15 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576362.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Reference List
  • Estrid Sørensen, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Book: The Materiality of Learning
  • Online publication: 15 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576362.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Reference List
  • Estrid Sørensen, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Book: The Materiality of Learning
  • Online publication: 15 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576362.009
Available formats
×