Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:48:55.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

2 - The Institutional Character of Halakhah

Menachem Kellner
Affiliation:
Jewish Thought Shalem College Jerusalem
Get access

Summary

Introduction

RABBENU NISSIM BEN REUVEN GERONDI (c.1310–76) raises a question concerning a well-known midrashic comment on Deuteronomy 17: 11. The verse reads: ‘You shall act in accordance with the instructions given you and the ruling handed down to you; you must not deviate from the verdict that they announce to you either to the right or to the left.’ On this last expression, Sifrei on Deuteronomy (paragraph 154) comments: ‘Even if they tell you that right is left, and left is right.’ Rabbenu Nissim asks:

There is place here for further investigation, to wit: it is fitting that this [position] follow from the view of those who think that there are no reasons for the commandments of the Torah at all and that all of them are consequences exclusively of [God's] will alone. According to this, the thing itself is neither ritually impure nor ritually pure, for example, but what makes it ritually impure or pure is a consequence of [God's] will alone.

Were this the case, Rabbenu Nissim points out, and since the Torah commands that we follow the decision of the sages of each generation, no damage could occur to the soul of the person who follows the decision of the sages of his generation, even if they mistakenly tell him that right is left, or left is right, or, more to the point, that it is permissible to eat something which, in fact, is actually not kosher. Rabbenu Nissim rejects this position:

But … we choose not to adopt this position, but believe that all that the Torah forbids us harms us and leaves an evil impression in our souls, even if we do not know its cause. According to this view, then, if the sages were to agree concerning an impure thing that it was pure, what will be? For that thing will harm us and cause what is in its nature to cause, even though the sages agreed that it is pure. (p. 437)

Ingesting something unkosher actually harms the Jew. The forbidden food is forbidden because it is in itself harmful (at least to Jews).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×