Book contents
- Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century bc Rome
- Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century bc Rome
- Copyright page
- Contents
- About the Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- A Note on References
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Part I Putting Lucilius’ Satires in Context
- Part II Lucilius’ Language, Style, and Meter: Continuity and Innovation
- Part III Generic and Social Settings for Lucilian Satire
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- Index Rerum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2018
Book contents
- Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century bc Rome
- Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century bc Rome
- Copyright page
- Contents
- About the Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- A Note on References
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Part I Putting Lucilius’ Satires in Context
- Part II Lucilius’ Language, Style, and Meter: Continuity and Innovation
- Part III Generic and Social Settings for Lucilian Satire
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- Index Rerum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century BC Rome , pp. 292 - 311Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Adams, J. N. 1977. The Vulgar Latin of the Letters of Claudius Terentianus (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. 1992. “Iteration of Compound Verb with Simplex in Latin Prose,” Eikasmos 3: 295–8.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. 1994. Wackernagel’s Law and the Placement of the Copula esse in Classical Latin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. 1995. “The Language of the Vindolanda Writing Tablets: An Interim Report,” JRS 85: 86–134.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. 2007. The Regional Diversification of Latin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. 2013. Social Variation and the Latin Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. 2016. An Anthology of Informal Latin, 200 bc–ad 900: Fifty Texts with Translations and Linguistic Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. G. (eds) 1999. Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. 1973. Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. 1978. Vox Latina: The Pronunciation of Classical Latin, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1963. Pompey, his Friends, and the Literature of the First Century b.c. University of California Publications in Classical Philology 19 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1982. Essays in Roman Satire (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, F. 1962. La formation des composés nominaux du latin (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakkum, G. C. L. M. 2009. The Latin Dialect of the Ager Faliscus: 150 Years of Scholarship (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).Google Scholar
Baldi, P. and Cuzzolin, P. (eds) 2009. New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1996. “Poetry, Praise, and Patronage: Simonides in Book 4 of Horace’s Odes,” ClAnt 15: 5–47.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. and Cucchiarelli, A. 2005. “Satire and the Poet: The Body as Self-Referential Symbol,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 207–23.Google Scholar
Bardon, H. 1957. “Catulle et ses modèles poétiques de langue latine,” Latomus 16: 614–27.Google Scholar
Battré, C. 1909. De recompositionis in verbis Latinis adhibitae usu et notione. Diss. Jena.Google Scholar
Behaghel, O. 1909. “Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern,” IF 25: 110–42.Google Scholar
Benedetto, G. 1997. “Il trattamento dei frammenti nell’edizione callimachea del 1761 attraverso la corrispondenza inedita di J. A. Ernesti con D. Ruhnkenius e L. C. Valckenaer (1748–1761),” in Most 1997: 95–110.Google Scholar
Berger, A. L., Della Pietra, S. A., and Della Pietra, V. J. 1996. “A Maximum Entropy Approach to Natural Language Processing,” Computational Linguistics 22: 39–71.Google Scholar
Bernardi Perini, G. 1983. “Le ‘riforme’ ortografiche latine di età repubblicana,” AION(ling) 5: 141–69.Google Scholar
Bertini, F. 1967. “Errori nella tradizione manoscritta della ‘Compendiosa doctrina’,” Studi Noniani 1: 8–66.Google Scholar
Bertocchi, A., Maraldi, M., and Orlandini, A. 2010. “Quantification,” in Baldi, P. and Cuzzolin, P. (eds), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Vol. 3: Constituent Syntax: Quantification, Numerals, Possession, Anaphora (Berlin: De Gruyter), 19–173.Google Scholar
Bo, D. 1960. De Horati poetico eloquio: Indices nominum propriorum, metricarum rerum prosodiacarum grammaticarumque (Turin: Paravia).Google Scholar
Bogel, F. V. 2001. The Difference Satire Makes: Rhetoric and Reading from Johnson to Byron (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Bolaño, R. 2010. “Literature + Illness = Illness,” in The Insufferable Gaucho, trans. C. Andrews (New York: New Directions), 123–44.Google Scholar
Bolelli, T. 1968. “Lat. muricidus (Plaut. Epid. 333),” in Studi linguistici in onore di V. Pisani (Brescia: Paideia), 125–8.Google Scholar
Bortone Poli, A. 1979. Aspetti della tecnica esametrica di Lucilio (Lecce: Editrice Salentina).Google Scholar
Braund, S. 1988. Beyond Anger: A Study of Juvenal’s Third Book of Satires (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Braund, S. 1997. “A Passion Unconsoled? Grief and Anger in Juvenal Satire 13,” in Braund and Gill 1997: 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. and Gill, C. (eds) 1997. The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breed, B. W. and Rossi, A. (eds) 2006. Ennius and the Invention of Roman Epic = Arethusa 39: 397–611.Google Scholar
Breyer, G. 1993. Etruskisches Sprachgut im Lateinischen unter Ausschluss des spezifisch onomastischen Bereiches (Leuven: Peeters).Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1963. Horace on Poetry: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. 2005. “The Language and Style of the Fragmentary Republican Historians,” in Reinhardt, Lapidge, and Adams 2005: 53–72.Google Scholar
Brøndal, V. 1937. “Omnis et totus: analyse et étymologie,” in Hendriksen, H. (ed.), Mélanges linguistiques offerts à Holger Pedersen (Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard), 261–7.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1971. Italian Manpower 225 b.c.–a.d. 14 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bücheler, F. 1886. “Zu Lucilius und zur altlateinischen Prosodie,” Archiv für lateinische Lexicographie und Grammatik mit Einschluss des älteren Mittellateins 3: 144–6.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. 2008. “The Poetic Treatment of atque from Catullus to Juvenal,” Mnemosyne 61: 386–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, R. R. 2016. “Terence and Satire,” in Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. J., and Manuwald, G. (eds), Roman Drama and Its Contexts (Berlin: De Gruyter), 435–52.Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A. 2001. “Ego Polivi Versibus Senariis: Phaedrus and Iambic Poetry,” in Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A., and Barchiesi, A. (eds), Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), 205–17.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. 2004. “The Roman Satirist Speaks Greek,” Classics Ireland 11: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahoud, A. 2007a. “Alternità linguistica, latinitas e ideologia tra Lucilio e Cicerone,” in Oniga, R. and Vatteroni, S. (eds), Plurilinguismo letterario (Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino), 39–56.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. 2007b. “Antiquity and Authority in Nonius Marcellus,” in Scourfield, J. H. D. (ed.), Texts and Culture in Late Antiquity: Inheritance, Authority, and Change (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahoud, A. 2010. “Romani veteres atque urbani sales: A Note on Cicero De Oratore 2.262 and Lucilius 173M,” in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C. (eds), Ancient Historiography and its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahoud, A. 2011. “The Language of Latin Verse Satire,” in Clackson 2011: 367–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, D. 2008. Plautus: Casina, Amphitryon, Captivi, Pseudolus (Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing).Google Scholar
Christes, J. 1971. Der frühe Lucilius: Rekonstruktion und Interpretation des XXVI. Buches sowie von Teilen des XXX. Buches (Heidelberg: C. Winter).Google Scholar
Christes, J. 1986. “Lucilius,” in Adamietz, J. (ed.), Die römische Satire (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 57–122.Google Scholar
Christes, J. 1998. “Lucilius senex – vetus historia – Epilog zu XXVI–XXX: Drei alte Fragen neu verhandelt,” Philologus 142: 71–9.Google Scholar
Christes, J. and Garbugino, G. 2015. Lucilius: Satiren (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Clackson, J. (ed.) 2011. A Companion to the Latin Language (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clackson, J. 2015. Language and Society in the Greek and Roman Worlds (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Clackson, J. and Horrocks, G. 2007. The Blackwell History of the Latin Language (Malden, MA: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. 1996. “Grundlagen und Absicht der Kritik des Lucilius,” in Klodt 1996: 11–28.Google Scholar
Clemente, G. 1981. “Le leggi sul lusso e la società romana tra III e II secolo a.C.,” in Giardina, A. and Schiavone, A. (eds), Società Romana e Produzione Schiavistica. Vol. 3: Modelli etici, diritto e trasformazione sociale (Rome: Laterza), 1–14.Google Scholar
Cloud, J. D. 1989. “Satirists and the Law,” in Braund, S. (ed.), Satire and Society in Ancient Rome (Exeter: University of Exeter Press), 49–67.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1982. “L’ ‘agora’ des Italiens a Delo: il mercato degli schiavi?” in Delo e l’Italia, Opuscula Instituti Romani Finlandiae 2 (Rome: Bardi), 119–48.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. 1972. “Verse Scansion and the Analysis of Latin Hexameter Rhythm,” Didaskalos 4: 192–205.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. 1989. “The Rise and Fall of Absolute Constructions: A Latin Case History,” in Calboli, G. (ed.), Subordination and Other Topics in Latin (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 353–74.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. 1998. “Accent and Quantity in Latin Versification: Continuities and Discontinuities,” in García-Hernández, B. (ed.), Estudios de lingüística latina: Actas del IX Coloquio Internacional de Lingüística Latina, vol. 2 (Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas), 1087–1100.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. 1999. “Poetic Diction, Poetic Discourse and the Poetic Register,” in Adams and Mayer 1999: 21–93.Google Scholar
Collard, C. and Cropp, M. 2008. Euripides. Vol. 7: Fragments: Aegeus – Meleager (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Connors, C. 1998. Petronius the Poet: Verse and Literary Tradition in the Satyricon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Cooley, A. E. 2009. Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Text, Translation, and Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Corbier, M. 1999. “The Broad Bean and the Moray: Social Hierarchies and Food in Rome,” in Flandrin, J.-L. and Montanari, M. (eds), Foods: A Culinary History from Antiquity to the Present (New York: Columbia University Press), 128–40.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (ed.) 2013. The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cozzoli, A.-T. 1995. “Poesia satirica latina e favola esopica (Ennio, Lucilio, e Orazio),” RCCM 37: 187–204.Google Scholar
Craig, C. 2004. “Audience Expectations, Invective and Proof,” in Powell, J. and Paterson, J. (eds), Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 187–213.Google Scholar
Cucchiarelli, A. 2001. La satira e il poeta: Orazio tra epodi e sermones (Pisa: Giardini).Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. P. 1957. “Some Phonetic Aspects of Word-Order Patterns in Latin,” PAPhS 101: 481–505.Google Scholar
Cupaiuolo, F. 1985. “Esametro,” Enciclopedia Virgiliana (Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana), vol. 2, 375–9.Google Scholar
Damon, C. 1997. The Mask of the Parasite: A Pathology of Roman Patronage (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Dauster, M. 2003. “Roman Republican Sumptuary Legislation: 182–102,” Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 11: 65–93.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. 2003. “Le prix de la voix: remarques sur la clause d’exclusion des praecones de la table d’Héraclée,” in Hantos, T. (ed.), Laurea internationalis: Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken zum 75. Geburtstag (Stuttgart: F. Steiner), 81–106.Google Scholar
De Ligt, L. 2002. “Restraining the Rich, Protecting the Poor: Symbolic Aspects of Roman Legislation,” in Jongman, W. and Kleijwegt, M. (eds), After the Past: Essays in Ancient History in Honour of H. W. Pleket (Leiden: Brill), 1–45.Google Scholar
De Melo, W. 2007. The Early Latin Verb System: Archaic Forms in Plautus, Terence, and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Melo, W. 2010. “Possessive Pronouns in Plautus,” in Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. (eds), Colloquial and Literary Latin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Melo, W. 2013. Plautus. Vol. 5: Stichus, Trinummus, Truculentus, Vidularia, Fragments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Dench, E. 2005. Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Simone, C. and Marchesini, S. 2002. Monumenta Linguae Messapicae, 2 vols. (Wiesbaden: Reichert).Google Scholar
Déry, C. A. 1998. “Fish as Food and Symbol in Ancient Rome,” in Walker, H. (ed.), Fish: Food from the Waters (Totnes: Prospect Books), 94–115.Google Scholar
Devine, A. M. and Stephens, L. D. 2006. Latin Word Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, E. 2002. Latin Forms of Address: From Plautus to Apuleius (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Donahue, J. F. 2004. The Roman Community at Table during the Principate (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Dubois, C. 1933. La métrique de Lucrèce comparée à celle de ses prédécesseurs Ennius et Lucilius (Strasbourg: Librairie Universitaire d’Alsace).Google Scholar
Dugan, J. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. and Woodman, A. J. 2012. “Epilogue,” in Du Quesnay, I. and Woodman, A. J. (eds), Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 255–72.Google Scholar
Earl, D. C. 1961. The Political Thought of Sallust (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Elliott, J. 2013. Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdkamp, P. 2005. The Grain Market in the Roman Empire: A Social, Political and Economic Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Ernout, A. 1957. “Farfarus et Marmar,” in Philologica, vol. 2 (Paris: Klincksieck), 209–15.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2007. “Horace’s Body, Horace’s Books,” in Heyworth, S. J. (ed.), Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 174–93.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2009. “Una cum scriptore meo: Poetry, Principate, and the Traditions of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus,” in Freudenburg 2009: 360–85.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2016. Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Fentress, E. A. 2013. “Strangers in the City: Élite Communication in the Hellenistic Central Mediterranean,” in Prag, J. R. W. and Quinn, J. C. (eds), The Hellenistic West (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 157–78.Google Scholar
Ferriss-Hill, J. 2015. Roman Satire and the Old Comic Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Fiske, G. C. 1920. Lucilius and Horace: A Study in the Classical Theory of Imitation (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E. (eds) 2007. Ennius Perennis: The Annals and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Fortson IV, B. W. 2008. Language and Rhythm in Plautus: Synchronic and Diachronic Studies (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1960. Elementi plautini in Plauto, trans. F. Munari (Florence: La Nuova Italia).Google Scholar
Frank, E. 1970. “The Ictus in the Vergilian and Silver Epic Hexameter,” RIL 104: 327–31.Google Scholar
Frayn, J. M. 1993. Markets and Fairs in Roman Italy: Their Social and Economic Importance from the Second Century bc to the Third Century ad (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 1993. The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2001. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (ed.) 2005a. The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2005b. “Introduction: Roman Satire,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (ed.) 2009. Horace: Satires and Epistles (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2013. “The Afterlife of Varro in Horace’s Sermones,” in Papanghelis, Harrison, and Frangoulidis 2013: 297–336.Google Scholar
Fruyt, M. 2011. “Word-Formation in Classical Latin,” in Clackson 2011: 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, J. F. and Hausburg, B. 2013. Caesar and the Bellum Alexandrinum: An Analysis of Style, Narrative Technique, and the Reception of Greek Historiography (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Garbugino, G. 1982. “Note critiche ai libri I–VIII di Lucilio,” Studi Noniani 7: 100–15Google Scholar
Giardina, A. 1997. L’Italia romana: Storie di un’ identità incompiuta (Bari: Laterza).Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2003. “The ‘Annalist’ before the Annalists: Ennius and his Annales,” in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N., and Walter, U. (eds), Formen römi- scher Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius: Gattungnen, Autoren, Kontexte (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 93–114.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2007. “Virgil vs. Ennius, or: The Undoing of the Annalist,” in Fitzgerald and Gowers 2007: 73–102.Google Scholar
Goh, I. 2014. “An Isocratean Allusion in a Lucilian Letter (181–8M=182–9K),” Philologus 158: 187–91.Google Scholar
Goh, I. 2016. “Of Cabbages and Kin: Traces of Lucilius in the First Half of Horace’s Epodes,” in Bather, P. and Stocks, C. (eds), Horace’s Epodes: Contexts, Intertexts, and Reception (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 63–83.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. 1986. Understanding Terence (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. 2005. Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and its Reception (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldwater, S. and Johnson, M. 2003. “Learning OT Constraint Rankings Using a Maximum Entropy Model,” in Spenader, J., Eriksson, A., and Dahl, Ö. (eds), Variation within Optimality Theory: Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on “Variation within Optimality Theory,” April 26–27, 2003 at Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Sweden (Stockholm: Stockholm University Department of Linguistics), 113–22.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. 2002. “A Factorial Typology of Quantity-Insensitive Stress,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 491–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. 1993a. “Horace, Satires 1.5: An Inconsequential Journey,” PCPS 39: 48–66 = Freudenburg 2009: 156–80.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 1993b. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 2000. “Vegetable Love: Virgil, Columella, and Garden Poetry,” Ramus 29: 127–48.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 2004. “The Plot Thickens: Hidden Outlines in Terence’s Prologues,” Ramus 33: 150–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granucci, F. 2013. “Les emprunts gaulois dans la littérature latine archaïque,” EC 39: 211–47.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S., 1982. “The Satires of Ennius and Lucilius,” in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. (eds), Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 156–71.Google Scholar
Gray, C. 2015. Jerome, Vita Malchi: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Greene, J. and Kehoe, D. 1995. “Mago the Carthaginian,” in Actes du III congrès international des études phéniciennes et puniques (Tunis: Institut National du Patrimoine), 110–17.Google Scholar
Griffith, J. G. 1970. “The Ending of Juvenal’s First Satire and Lucilius Book III.” Hermes 98: 56–72.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 2007. “Romans and Others,” in Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds), A Companion to the Roman Republic (Oxford: Blackwell), 459–77.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1990. “Towards a History of Friendly Advice: The Politics of Candor in Cicero’s de Amicitia.” Apeiron 23: 165–85.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 2005. “Satire as Aristocratic Play,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. 2007. “Poets, Patrons, Rulers: The Ennian Traditions,” in Fitzgerald and Gowers 2007: 129–44.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (ed.) 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Horace (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2013. “Author and Speaker(s) in Horace’s Satires 2,” in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds), The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 153–71.Google Scholar
Hass, K. 2007. Lucilius und der Beginn der Persönlichkeitsdichtung in Rom. Hermes Einzelschriften 99 (Stuttgart: F. Steiner).Google Scholar
Hine, H. 2005. “Poetic Influence on Prose: The Case of the Younger Seneca,” in Reinhardt, Lapidge, and Adams 2005: 211–37.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 2002. The Ancient Fable: An Introduction (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1981. “Some Problems of Titulature in Roman Literary History,” BICS 28: 103–14.Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. 2004. “The Wolf and the Dog (Horace, Sermones 2.2.64),” CQ 54: 300–4.Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. 1937. M. Manilii Astronomicon liber primus, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1991. The Mask of Comedy: Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2008. Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2013. Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson Knight, W. F. 1931a. “Homodyne in the Fourth Foot of the Vergilian Hexameter,” CQ 25: 184–94.Google Scholar
Janssen, H. H. 1988. “Le caratteristiche della lingua poetica romana,” in Lunelli, A. (ed.), La lingua poetica latina, 3rd ed. (Bologna: Pàtron), 69–130.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1900. “Den psykologiske Grund til nogle metriske Fænomener,” Oversigt over det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs forhandlinger 1900: 487–530.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. D. and Wallace, R. E. 1992. “Socially Determined Variation in Ancient Rome,” Language Variation and Change 4: 105–19.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 1995. Suetonius: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2007. “Defining the Art of Blame,” in Quintero, R. (ed.), A Companion to Satire: Ancient and Modern (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 2012. “Satiric Textures: Style, Metre and Rhetoric,” in Braund, S. and Osgood, J. (eds), A Companion to Persius and Juvenal (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell), 113–36.Google Scholar
Keulen, W. 2009. Gellius the Satirist: Roman Cultural Authority in Attic Nights (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1977. “The Rhythmic Structure of English Verse,” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 189–247.Google Scholar
Klodt, C. (ed.) 1996. Satura lanx: Festschrift für Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag (Hildesheim: G. Olms).Google Scholar
Knox, P. 2012. “Language, Style and Metre in Horace,” in Günther, H.-C. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Horace (Leiden: Brill), 527–46.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Koster, S. 1980. Die Invektive in der griechischen und römischen Literatur (Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain).Google Scholar
Krahe, H. 1941. “Die Ortsnamen des antiken Lukaniens und Bruttierlandes,” Zeitschrift für Ortsnamenforschung 17: 74–140.Google Scholar
Kron, G. 2014. “Animal Husbandry,” in Campbell, G. L. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 109–35.Google Scholar
Kropp, A. 2008. Defixiones: Ein aktuelles corpus lateinischer Fluchtafeln (Speyer: Kartoffeldr.-Verlag Brodersen).Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. 2001. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. 1955. Ausfürliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Satzlehre, 3rd ed., rev. A. Thierfelder (Hanover: Hahn).Google Scholar
Langslow, D. R. (ed.) 2009. Jacob Wackernagel, Lectures on Syntax: With Special Reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Laughton, E. Laughton, E. 1970. Review of E. Fraenkel, Leseproben aus Reden Ciceros und Catos (Rome: Storia e Letteratura, 1968), JRS 60: 188–94.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. 1960. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft (Munich: M. Hueber).Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1999. “Ciceronian ‘Bi-Marcus’: Correspondence with M. Terentius Varro and L. Papirius Paetus in 46 b.c.e.,” TAPhA 129: 139–79.Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1960. “Anzeige von Lucilii Carminum Reliquiae ed. Marx, I–II,” in Ausgewählte kleine Schriften, ed. Fraenkel, E. (Rome: Storia e Letteratura), vol. 1, 221–47.Google Scholar
Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R. 1996. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music, rev. ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Lindner, T. 2002. Lateinische Komposita: Morphologische, historische und lexikalische Studien (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck).Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1901. Nonius Marcellus’ Dictionary of Republican Latin (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 1994. “Political History, 146–95 b.c.,” in Crook, J. A., Lintott, A., and Rawson, E. (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed., vol. 9 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 40–103.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 1999. Violence in Republican Rome, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Löfstedt, B. 2000. Ausgewählte Aufsätze zur lateinischen Sprachgeschichte und Philologie, ed. Berschin, W. (Stuttgart: A. Hiersemann).Google Scholar
Lomas, K. 2008. “Script Obsolescence in Ancient Italy: From Pre-Roman to Roman Writing,” in Baines, J., Bennet, J., and Houston, S. (eds), The Disappearance of Writing Systems: Perspectives on Literacy and Communication (London: Equinox Publishing), 109–38.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2009. Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. 2002. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
McClelland, J. 2007. Body and Mind: Sport in Europe from the Roman Empire to the Renaissance (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
McConnell, S. 2014. Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
McDiarmid, L. 2014. Poets and the Peacock Dinner: The Literary History of a Meal (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. 2006a. “Roman Aesthetics and the Spoils of Syracuse,” in Dillon, S. and Welch, K. (eds), Representations of War in Ancient Rome (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 68–90.Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. 2006b. Roman Manliness: Virtue and the Roman Republic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Maltby, R. 1995. “The Distribution of Greek Loan-Words in Plautus,” Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 31–69.Google Scholar
Mancini, A. 1980. “Le iscrizioni della Valcamonica.” Studi Urbinati di storia, filosofia, letteratura, Supplemento 2/1: 75–166.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2001b. Fabulae praetextae: Spuren einer literarischen Gattung der Römer (Munich: C. H. Beck).Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2009. “Concilia deorum: Ein episches Motiv in der römischen Satire,” in Felgentreu, F., Mundt, F., and Rücker, N. (eds), Per attentam Caesaris aurem. Satire – Die unpolitische Gattung? (Tübingen: Gunter Narr), 46–61.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. 2005. “Traces of a Freed Language: Horace, Petronius, and the Rhetoric of Fable,” ClAnt 24: 307–30.Google Scholar
Mariotti, I. 1963. “Horret et alget,” in Lanx satura Nicolao Terzaghi oblata (Genoa: Istituto di Filologia), 249–60.Google Scholar
Marouzeau, J. 1949. L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine. Vol. 3: Les articulations de l’énoncé (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Marouzeau, J. 1954. Traité de Stylistique latine, 3rd ed. (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Martin, R. H. and Woodman, A. J. 1989. Tacitus: Annals Book IV (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Marzano, A. 2007. Roman Villas in Central Italy: A Social and Economic History (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Marzano, A. 2013. Harvesting the Sea: The Exploitation of Marine Resources in the Roman Mediterranean (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Mayer, R. 2003. “Persona(l) Problems: The Literary Persona in Antiquity Revisited,” MD 50: 55–80.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. 2005. “Sleeping with the Enemy: Satire and Philosophy,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 146–59.Google Scholar
Mercado, A. 2012. Italic Verse: A Study of the Poetic Remains of Old Latin, Faliscan, and Sabellic (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck).Google Scholar
Meiser, G. 1998. Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Meyer, E. A. 2004. Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World: Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2007. “The Penetrating I: Lucilius and the Body as the Site of Truth,” in Tomiche, A. and Zoberman, P. (eds), Littérature et identités sexuelles (Paris: Société Française de Littérature Générale et Comparée), 91–104.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 2010. Musa pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Moro, C. 1995. La varietà e la norma: I frammenti giambo-trocaici di Lucilio fra versificazione drammatica e alessandrinismo (Padua: Imprimatur).Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (ed.) 1997. Collecting Fragments, Fragmente sammeln (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Muecke, F. 2005. “Rome’s First ‘Satirists’: Themes and Genre in Ennius and Lucilius,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 33–47.Google Scholar
Muecke, F. 2013. “The Invention of Satire: A Paradigmatic Case?,” in Papanghelis, Harrison, and Frangoulidis 2013: 283–95.Google Scholar
Nilsson, N.-O. 1952. Metrische Stildifferenzen in den Satiren des Horaz (Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell).Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1961. Cicero: In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
O’Neill, E. G. 1940. “Word-Accents and Final Syllables in Latin Verse,” TAPhA 71: 335–59.Google Scholar
Oniga, R. 1988. I composti nominali latini: Una morfologia generativa (Bologna: Pàtron).Google Scholar
Opelt, I. 1965. Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen: eine Typologie (Heidelberg: C. Winter).Google Scholar
Östenberg, I. 2009. Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. 2010. Decimus Laberius: The Fragments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Panico, G. 1980. “Caton et Lélius chez Cicéron: sagesse grecque ou sagesse romaine?,” in Caron, J.-B., Fortin, M., and Maloney, G. (eds), Mélanges d’Études offerts à Maurice Lebel (Quebec: Éditions du Sphinx), 257–66.Google Scholar
Papanghelis, T. D., Harrison, S. J., and Frangoulidis, S. (eds) 2013. Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature. Trends in Classics supplementary volume 20 (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Parker, H. 1996. “Plautus vs. Terence: Audience and Popularity Re-Examined,” AJPh 117: 585–617.Google Scholar
Partoens, G., Roskam, G., and Van Houdt, T. 2004. “Introduction: The Semantics and Pragmatics of virtus,” in Virtutis imago: Studies on the Conceptualisation and Transformation of an Ancient Ideal (Leuven: Peeters), 1–26.Google Scholar
Pawłowski, A. and Eder, M. 2001. “Quantity or Stress? Sequential Analysis of Latin Prosody,” Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 8: 81–97.Google Scholar
Pennacini, A. 1968. “Funzioni della rappresentazione del reale nella satira di Lucilio,” AAT 102: 311–435.Google Scholar
Penney, J. H. W. 1988. “The Languages of Italy,” in Boardman, J., Hammond, N. G. L., Lewis, D. M., and Ostwald, M. (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed., vol. 4 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 720–38.Google Scholar
Penney, J. H. W. 2005. “Connections in Archaic Latin Prose,” in Reinhardt, Lapidge, and Adams 2005: 37–51.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. 1992. Is Literary History Possible? (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Petersmann, H. 1999. “The Language of Early Roman Satire: Its Function and Characteristics,” in Adams and Mayer 1999: 289–310.Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. 2015. Terence and the Verb “To Be” in Latin (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. 2016. “Comic Lexicon: Searching for Underground Latin from Plautus to Erasmus,” in Adams, J. N. and Vincent, N. (eds), Early and Late Latin: Continuity of Change? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 14–46.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 2001. “Über die sogennante cohors amicorum des Scipio Aemilianus,” in Peachin, M. (ed.), Aspects of Friendship in the Graeco-Roman World, JRA Supplementary Series 43 (Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology), 89–98.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. 1984. “Filtri culturali ed ipotesi linguistiche nella tradizione e negli studi relativi al teonimo italico Angitia,” Abruzzo 22: 207–29.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. 2003. “Il plurilinguismo nelle Satire di Lucilio e le selve dell’interpretazione: Gli elementi italici nei frammenti 581 e 1318 M.,” in Oniga, R. (ed.), Il plurilinguismo nella tradizione letteraria latina (Rome: Il Calamo), 63–89.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. 2005. “Il declino (o i presunti declini) della Magna Grecia, aspetti della fenomenologia linguistica,” in Tramonto della Magna Grecia (Taranto: ISAMG), 77–159.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. 2006. “Fenomeni di allomorfismo flessionale in ambiente bilingue osco-greco. Un contributo alla storia di lat. Aiāx, Bruttāx e oltre,” in Scritti linguistici in onore di Roberto Gusmani (Alessandria: Orso), 1359–72.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. 2014. “Bilingues Bruttaces. Il plurilinguismo di una città della Magna Grecia attraverso i suoi testi: il caso di Petelia,” in Giacomelli, R. and Bianchi, A. R. (eds), Le lingue dell’Italia antica oltre il latino: Lasciamo parlare i testi. Incontro di Studio 50 (Milan: Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere), 73–110.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P., Poli, D., and Santini, C. 1999. Una storia della lingua latina (Rome: Carocci).Google Scholar
Porzio Gernia, M. L. 1981. “Gli elementi celtici del latino,” in Campanile 1981b: 97–123.Google Scholar
Potthoff, A. 1992. Lateinische Kleidungsbezeichnungen in synchroner und diachroner Sicht (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck).Google Scholar
Probert, P. 2002. “On the Prosody of Latin Enclitics,” Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 7: 181–205.Google Scholar
Prosdocimi, A. L. 1988. “La lingua,” in Fogolari, G. and Prosdocimi, A. L. (eds), I Veneti antichi: Lingua e cultura (Padua: Studio Editoriale Programma), 221–440.Google Scholar
Puccioni, G. 1944. “L’uso stilistico dei composti nominali latini,” RAL, series 7, 4: 371–481.Google Scholar
Puelma Piwonka, M. 1949. Lucilius und Kallimachos (Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann).Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 1995. “Eating Fish: The Paradoxes of Seafood,” in Wilkins, J., Harvey, D., and Dobson, M. (eds), Food in Antiquity (Exeter: University of Exeter Press), 132–49.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 2003. “The Way We Used to Eat: Diet, Community, and History at Rome,” AJPh 124: 329–58.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1986. Artifices of Eternity: Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Raschke, W. 1987. “Arma pro amico – Lucilian Satire at the Crisis of the Roman Republic,” Hermes 115: 299–318.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M., and Adams, J. N. (eds) 2005. Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Relihan, J. C. 1993. Ancient Menippean Satire (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. 1999. Crime and Community in Ciceronian Rome (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar
Rix, H. 2002. Sabellische Texte: Die Texte des Oskischen, Umbrischen, und Südpikenische (Heidelberg: C. Winter).Google Scholar
Rosén, H. 2009. “Coherence, Sentence Modification, and Sentence-Part Modification – The Contribution of Particles,” in Baldi and Cuzzolin 2009: 317–441.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 2007. Making Mockery: The Poetics of Ancient Satire (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 2012. “Satire in the Republic: From Lucilius to Horace,” in Braund and Osgood 2012: 19–40.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. and Breed, B. W. 2006. “Introduction: Ennius and the Traditions of Epic,” Arethusa 39: 397–425.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2000. “Räume literarischer Kommunikation in der Formierungsphase römischer Literatur,” in Braun, M., Haltenhoff, A., and Mutschler, F. H. (eds), Moribus antiquis res stat Romana: Römische Werte und römische Literatur im 3. und 2. Jh. v. Chr. (Munich: Saur), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2001. “Kulturtransfer als Rekodierung: Zum literaturgeschichtlichen und sozialen Ort der frühen römischen Epik,” in Rüpke, J. (ed.), Von Göttern und Menschen erzählen: Formkonstanzen und Funktionswandel vormoderner Epik (Stuttgart: F. Steiner), 42–64.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2004. “Acta aut agenda: Relations of Script and Performance,” in Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J., and Stephens, S. A. (eds), Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome (Stuttgart: F. Steiner), 23–44.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. 2012. Ancient Rome as a Museum: Power, Identity, and the Culture of Collecting (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schilling, N. 2004. “Investigating Stylistic Variation,” in Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., and Schilling, N. (eds), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (Oxford: Blackwell), 375–401.Google Scholar
Schlegel, C. 2005. Satire and the Threat of Speech in Horace Satires Book 1 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. 1989. “Postquam ludus in artem paulatim verterat. Varro und die Frühgeschichte des römischen Theaters,” in Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.), Studien zur vorliterarischen Periode im frühen Rom, ScriptOralia 12 (Tübingen: Gunter Narr), 77–133.Google Scholar
Schumacher, S. 2004. Die Rätischen Inschriften. Geschichte und heutiger Stand der Forschung, 2nd ed. (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck).Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2000. Prolegomena zu einer “Phänomenologie” der römischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. 2010. “Roman Oratory before Cicero: The Elder Cato and Gaius Gracchus,” in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 54–66.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 1987. “Horace, Lucilius, and Callimachean Polemic,” HSPh 91: 199–215 = Freudenburg 2009: 212–30.Google Scholar
Sharland, S. 2010. Horace in Dialogue: Bakhtinian Readings in the Satires (Bern: Peter Lang).Google Scholar
Shaw, C. 2009. “ΣΚΟΡΠΙΟΣ or ΣΚΩΡ ΠΕΟΣ? A Sexual Joke in Archestratus’ Hedypatheia,” CQ 59: 634–9.Google Scholar
Sheskin, D. J. 2007. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, 4th ed. (Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC).Google Scholar
Sihler, A. L. 1995. New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 2003. Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, C. J. and Covino, R. (eds) 2010. Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales).Google Scholar
Somerville, T. 2007. “The Orthography of the New Gallus and the Spelling Rules of Lucilius,” ZPE 106: 59–64.Google Scholar
Stowasser, J. M. 1880. Der Hexameter des Lucilius (Vienna: Selbstverlag der Lehranstalt [K.K. Staatsgymnasium im IX. Bezirke]).Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 1968. Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter. Livius Andronicus – Naevius – Ennius (Hildesheim: Olms).Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 2002. “Gelegenheitsdichtung und Kleinformen,” in Suerbaum, W. (ed.), Handbuch der Lateinischen Literatur der Antike. Vol. 1: Die Archaische Literatur (Munich: C. H. Beck), 319–40.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, C. A. 1966. Studies in Classical Satire and Related Literary Theory (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Van Straaten, M. 1946. Panétius, sa vie, ses écrits et sa doctrine, avec une edition des fragments (Amsterdam: Paris).Google Scholar
Vine, B. 1993. Studies in Archaic Latin Inscriptions (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck).Google Scholar
Vollmer, F. 1905. Monumenta Germaniae Historica: Auctores Antiquissimi, vol. 14 (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar
Von Albrecht, M. 1997. A History of Roman Literature: From Livius Andronicus to Boethius, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1979. A Historical Commentary on Polybius, vol. 3 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Warmington, E. H. 1967. Remains of Old Latin. Vol. 3: Lucilius; The Twelve Tables, rev. ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Watkins, C. 1963. “Preliminaries to a Historical and Comparative Analysis of the Syntax of the Old Irish Verb,” Celtica 6: 1–49.Google Scholar
Weiss, M. 2009. Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin (Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press).Google Scholar
Welsh, J. T. 2011. “Accius, Porcius Licinus, and the Beginning of Latin Literature,” JRS 101: 31–50.Google Scholar
White, D. C. 1980. “The Method of Composition and Sources of Nonius Marcellus,” Studi Noniani 8: 111–212.Google Scholar
White, K. D. 1975. Farm Equipment of the Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wigodsky, M. 1972. Vergil and Early Latin Poetry. Hermes Einzelschriften 24 (Wiesbaden: F. Steiner).Google Scholar
Wilcox, A. 2005. “Sympathetic Rivals: Consolation in Cicero’s Letters,” AJPh 126: 237–55.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. 2003. “Land and Sea: Italy and the Mediterranean in the Roman Discourse of Dining,” AJPh 124: 359–75.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. 1985. Golden Latin Artistry (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press).Google Scholar
Williams, C. 2008. “Friends of the Roman People: Some Remarks on the Language of Amicitia,” in Coşkun, A. (ed.), Freundschaft und Gefolgschaft in den auswärtigen Beziehungen der Römer (2. Jahrhundert v.Chr. – 1. Jahrhundert n.Chr.) (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang) 29–44.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1995. “Libertino Patre Natus: True or False?,” in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 296–313.Google Scholar
Wills, J. 1996. Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 1997. “The Subjugation of Grief in Seneca’s Epistles,” in Braund and Gill 1997: 48–67.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. 1970. Problems in Quintilian. BICS Supplement 25 (London: University of London Institute of Classical Studies).Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2009. Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2015. The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1974. Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of the Comoedia Palliata (Rome: American Academy).Google Scholar
Zanda, E. 2011. Fighting Hydra-Like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic (London: Bristol Classical Press).Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1980. “Horace’s Liber Sermonum: The Structure of Ambiguity,” Arethusa 13: 59–77.Google Scholar