Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:38:42.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Marylebone in 1854: from conflict to compromise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Benjamin Weinstein
Affiliation:
Central Michigan University
Get access

Summary

Preceding chapters have emphasised the centrality of conflict to London's liberal political culture. It has been argued that discrete liberal subgroups, which subscribed to incompatible and in many ways antagonistic sets of political priorities, emerged within the reformed metropolitan constituencies during the mid-1830s and immediately began to compete with one another for political supremacy. This competition was intensified, or at the very least reinforced, by the cultural fault-lines which lay between these groups. Whereas the input of London's ‘shopocracy’ tied vestry radicalism to the related causes of government retrenchment and ratepayer self-determination, the cultural orientations of London's large professional community ensured a fairly substantial support base for the paternalist reform programme offered by Russellite Whiggery. Moreover, professionals by and large rejected market-driven and retrenchment-minded liberalism in favour of a bureaucracy of ‘experts’ which might protect London's poorest and most vulnerable from the self-interested parsimony of the ratepayers. London's paternally-minded social elites, of which there were many, joined the professionals in rejecting ratepayer democracy – many doing so out of the associated realisation that ‘government by experts’ would also protect the metropolitan landlords from the myopic parsimony of the ratepaying leaseholders and tenants. At the same time as London's professionals were hitching their star to Whiggery, the vestry camp was beginning to find its own parliamentary voice through an increasingly close association with populist ‘titled radicals’ such as Thomas Duncombe and Charles Tennyson D'Eyncourt. The speed with which many of London's socially Whiggish ‘titled radicals’ defected into the ultra-radical vestry camp during the mid- and late 1830s exacerbated the divisiveness of London's liberal political culture and eventually precipitated a polarisation of metropolitan liberalism during the 1840s and '50s.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×