Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:33:33.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Taxonomy, Integration, and Multiple Levels of Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2020

Edited by
Kenneth S. Kendler ,
Josef Parnas  and
Peter Zachar
Kenneth S. Kendler
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Josef Parnas
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Peter Zachar
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Montgomery
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
 , pp. 275 - 554
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reference

Parnas, J., & Bovet, P. (2015) ‘Psychiatry made easy: Operation(al)ism and some of its consequences.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry III: The Nature and Sources of Historical Change (pp. 190–212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957) Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anstey, P. R. (2011) John Locke and natural philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrios, G. E. (1996) The history of mental symptoms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Callard, F. (2016) ‘The intimate geographies of panic disorder: Parsing anxiety through pharmacological dissection.’ Osiris, 31, 203–226.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) ‘Construct validity in psychological tests.’ Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalzell, T. G. (2018) Freud’s Schreber between psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delude, C. M. (2015) ‘Deep phenotyping: The details of the disease.’ Nature, 527 (7576), S14–S15. Retrieved from www.nature.com/articles/527S14aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1996) The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2000) ‘Re-introducing the Concept of Mind.’ In Ryle, G. (Ed.), The concept of mind (pp. vii–xvii). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Engstrom, E. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2015) ‘Emil Kraepelin: Icon and reality.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 1190–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. (1895/1962) ‘On the grounds for detaching a particular syndrome from neurasthenia under the description of “anxiety neurosis.”’ In Strachey, J. (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 3), (1893–1899) Early psychoanalytic publications (pp. 87–116). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1995) Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (2002) Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heckers, S. (2008) ‘Making progress in schizophrenia research.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 591–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hempel, C. G. (1961) ‘Introduction to problems of taxonomy.’ In Zubin, J. (Ed.), Field studies in the mental disorders (pp. 3–22). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Henriksen, M. G., & Parnas, J. (2017) ‘Clinical manifestations of self-disorders in schizophrenia spectrum conditions.’ Current Problems of Psychiatry, 18(3), 177–183. doi:10.1515/cpp-2017-0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, S. E. (2010)’ The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155–179. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091532CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S., & Engstrom, E. J. (2017) ‘Kahlbaum, Hecker, and Kraepelin and the transition from psychiatric symptom complexes to empirical disease forms.’ The American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(2), 102–109. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030375Google Scholar
Khalidi, M. (2013) Natural categories and human kinds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, D. F., & Fink, M. (1962) ‘Psychiatric reaction patterns to imipramine.’ The American Journal of Psychiatry, 119, 432–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (2010) ‘Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain.’ Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 716–743. doi:10.1177/1745691610388774CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A., & Keller, J. (2000) ‘Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 212–215. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00097Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Møller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., & Zahavi, D. (2005) ‘EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience.’ Psychopathology, 38(5), 236–258. doi:10.1159/000088441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, P. N. (2012) ‘Deep phenotyping for precision medicine.’ Human Mutation, 33(5), 777–780. doi:10.1002/humu.22080Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949) The concept of mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tanney, J. (2015) ‘Gilbert Ryle.’ In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Standford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ryleGoogle Scholar
Zachar, P. (2008) ‘Real kinds but no true taxonomy: An essay in psychiatric systematics.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry: Explanation, phenomenology, and nosology (pp. 327–367). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Zachar, P. (2019) ‘Diagnostic nomenclatures in the mental health professions as public policy.’ Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 59(3), 438–445.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2007) ‘Psychiatric disorders: A conceptual taxonomy.’ The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(4), 557–565. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.164.4.557Google Scholar
Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2017) ‘The philosophy of nosology.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 49–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Bovet, P., & Parnas, J. (1993) ‘Schizophrenic delusions: A phenomenological approach.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 19(3), 579–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cermolacce, M., Sass, L., & Parnas, J. (2010) ‘What is bizarre in bizarre delusions? A critical review.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36(4), 667–679.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014) ‘The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology.’ World Psychiatry, 13(1), 28–35.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2015) ‘Brain disorders? Precisely.’ Science, 348(6234), 499–500.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leuret, F. (1834) Fragments Psychologiques sur la Folie. Paris: Crochard.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Poul.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, J., Revsbech, R., Sæbyt, D., & Parnas, J. (2012) ‘Assessing the diagnostic validity of a structured psychiatric interview in a first‐admission hospital sample.’ World Psychiatry, 11(3), 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordgaard, J., Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2013) ‘The psychiatric interview: Validity, structure, and subjectivity.’ European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 263, 353–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parnas, J. (2004) ‘Belief and pathology of self-awareness a phenomenological contribution to the classification of delusions.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(10–11), 148–161.Google Scholar
Parnas, J. (2012) ‘A sea of distress.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry II: Nosology (pp. 229–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnas, J., & Bovet, P. (2015) ‘Psychiatry made easy: Operation(al)ism and some of its consequences.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry III: The Nature and Sources of Historical Change (pp. 190–212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Sass, L. A., & Zahavi, D. (2013) ‘Rediscovering psychopathology: The epistemology and phenomenology of the psychiatric object.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(2), 270–277.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., & Urfer-Parnas, A. (2017) ‘The ontology and epistemology of symptoms: The case of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry IV: Classification of Psychiatric Illness (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A. R., Nordgaard, J., & Parnas, J. (2019) ‘Schizophrenia-spectrum psychopathology in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An empirical study.’ European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01022-z. [Epub ahead of print]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. D. (1959) Course in General Linguistics. New York: The Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Zandersen, M., Henriksen, M. G., & Parnas, J. (2019) ‘A recurrent question: “What is borderline?”’ Journal of Personality Disorders, 33(3), 341–369. doi:10.1521/pedi_2018_32_348Google Scholar
Zandersen, M., & Parnas, J. (2019a) ‘Borderline personality disorder or a disorder within the schizophrenia spectrum? A psychopathological study.’ World Psychiatry, 18(1), 109–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zandersen, M., & Parnas, J. (2019b) ‘Identity disturbance, feelings of emptiness, and the boundaries of the schizophrenia spectrum.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45(1), 106–113.Google Scholar

References

Gordon, J. (2017a) ‘The future of RDoC.’ Director’s Messages. Retrieved from www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/messages/2017/the-future-of-rdoc.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J. (2017b) ‘RDoC: Outcomes to causes and back.’ Director’s Messages. Retrieved from www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/messages/2017/rdoc-outcomes-to-causes-and-back.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Insel, T. R. (2014) ‘The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project: Precision medicine for psychiatry.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(4), 395–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Amundson, R. (2000). ‘Against Normal Function.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Biology and Biomedical Science 31(1):33–53.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. (2016) ‘Reduction in the Biomedical Sciences.’ In Solomon, M, Simon, J, and Kincaid, H (eds), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Medicine. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderzhanova, E, Kirmeier, T, and Wotjak, CT. (2017) ‘Animal Models in Psychiatric Research: The RDoC System as a New Framework for Endophenotype-Oriented Translational Neuroscience.’ Neurobiology of Stress 7 (December): 47–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayer, R, and Galea, S. (2015) ‘Public Health in the Precision-Medicine Era.’ New England Journal of Medicine 373 (6): 499–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boorse, C. (2011). ‘Concepts of Health and Disease.’ In Gifford, F (ed), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 16: Philosophy of Medicine. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier BV.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D, Cramer, A, and Kalis, A. (2018) ‘Brain Disorders? Not Really… Why Network Structures Block Reductionism in Psychopathology Research.’ Behavior and Brain Sciences (Jan 14): 1–54.Google Scholar
Bowker, GC, and Star, SL. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Broome, MR, and Bortolotti, L. (2009) ‘Mental Illness as Mental: In Defence of Psychological Realism.’ Humana Mente 11:25–43.Google Scholar
Carpenter, WT. (2016) ‘The RDoC Controversy: Alternate Paradigm or Dominant Paradigm?’ American Journal of Psychiatry 173 (6): 562–63.Google Scholar
Chang, H. (2004) Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, R, Mias, GI, Li-Pook-Than, J, Jiang, L, Lam, HY, Chen, R, Miriami, E, Karczewski, KJ, Hariharan, M, et al. (2012) ‘Personal Omics Profiling Reveals Dynamic Molecular and Medical Phenotypes.’ Cell 148: 1293–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C, Shah, SP, Chin, SF, Turashvili, G, Rueda, OM, Dunning, MJ, Speed, D, et al. (2012) ‘The Genomic and Transcriptomic Architecture of 2,000 Breast Tumours Reveals Novel Subgroups.’ Nature 486 (7403): 346–52.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, BN, and Kozak, MJ. (2013) ‘Constructing Constructs for Psychopathology: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria.’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology 122 (3): 928–37.Google Scholar
De Grandis, G, and Halgunset, V. (2016) ‘Conceptual and Terminological Confusion around Personalised Medicine: A Coping Strategy.’ BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Eyal, G, Sabatello, S, Tabb, K, Adams, R, Jones, M, Lichtenberg, FL, Nelson, A, et al. (2019) ‘The Physician–Patient Relationship in the Age of Precision Medicine.’ Genetics in Medicine 21 (4): 813–15.Google Scholar
Fernandes, BS, Williams, LM, Steiner, J, Leboyer, M, Carvalho, AF, and Berk, M. (2017) ‘The New Field of “Precision Psychiatry.”’ BMC Medicine 15 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
First, MB, and Westen, D. (2007) ‘Classification for Clinical Practice: How to Make ICD and DSM Better Able to Serve Clinicians.’ International Review of Psychiatry 19 (5): 473–81.Google Scholar
Gandal, MJ, Leppa, V, Won, H, Parikshak, NN, and Geschwind, DH. (2016) ‘The Road to Precision Psychiatry: Translating Genetics into Disease Mechanisms.’ Nature Neuroscience 19 (11): 1397–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillan, CM, and Whelan, R. (2017) ‘What Big Data Can Do for Treatment in Psychiatry.’ Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 18 (December): 34–42.Google Scholar
Gillett, G, and Harré, R. (2014) ‘Discourse and Diseases of the Psyche.’ In Fulford, KWM, Davies, M, Gipps, RGT, Graham, G, Sadler, JZ, Stanghellini, G, and Thornton, T (eds )The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Oxford University Press, 307–20. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579563.013.0022Google Scholar
Harper, AR, and Topol, EJ. (2012) ‘Pharmacogenomics in Clinical Practice and Drug Development.’ Nature Biotechnology 30 (11): 1117–24.Google Scholar
Haendel, MA, Chute, CG, and Robinson, PN. (2018) ‘Classification, Ontology, and Precision Medicine.’ New England Journal of Medicine 379 (15): 1452–62.Google Scholar
Haro, JM, Ayuso-Mateos, JL, Bitter, I, Demotes-Mainard, J, Leboyer, M, Lewis, SW, Linszen, D, et al. (2014) ‘ROAMER: Roadmap for Mental Health Research in Europe.’ International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 23 (S1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Hengartner, MP, and Lehmann, SN. (2017) ‘Why Psychiatric Research Must Abandon Traditional Diagnostic Classification and Adopt a Fully Dimensional Scope: Two Solutions to a Persistent Problem.’ Frontiers in Psychiatry 8 (June): 101.Google Scholar
Hey, SP, and Kesselheim, AS. (2016) ‘Countering Imprecision in Precision Medicine.’ Science 353 (6298): 448–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyman, S. (2010) ‘The Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: The Problem of Reification.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 6: 155–79.Google Scholar
Insel, TR. (2010) ‘Faulty Circuits.’ Scientific American 302 (4): 44–51.Google Scholar
Insel, TR. (2014) ‘The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: Precision Medicine for Psychiatry.’ American Journal of Psychiatry 171 (4): 395–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insel, TR, and Quirion, R. (2005) ‘Psychiatry as a Clinical Neuroscience Discipline.’ JAMA 294 (17): 2221–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insel, TR and Cuthbert, B. (2010). ‘The Data of Diagnosis: New Approaches to Psychiatric Classification.’ Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes 73 (4): 311–14.Google Scholar
Insel, TR, and Cuthburt, B. (2015) ‘Brain Disorders? Precisely.’ Science 348 (6234): 498–99.Google Scholar
Juengst, E, McGowan, ML, Fishman, JR, and Settersten, RA Jr. (2016) ‘From “Personalized” to “Precision” Medicine: The Ethical and Social Implications of Rhetorical Reform in Genomic Medicine.’ Hastings Center Report 46 (5): 21–33.Google Scholar
Kaiser, M. (2015) Reductive Explanation in the Biological Sciences. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendler, KS. (2005) ‘Toward a Philosophical Structure for Psychiatry.’ American Journal of Psychiatry 162 (3): 433–40.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS. (2012) ‘Epistemic Iteration as a Historical Model for Psychiatric Nosology: Promises and Limitations.’ In Kendler, KS and Parnas, J (eds), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry II: Nosology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khoury, MJ, Iademarco, MF, and Riley, WT. (2016) ‘Precision Public Health for the Era of Precision Medicine.’ American Journal of Preventive Medicine 50 (3): 398–401. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.031.Google Scholar
Kincaid, H, and Sullivan, JA (eds). (2014) Classifying Psychopathology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotov, R, Krueger, RF, Watson, D, Achenbach, TM, Althoff, RR, Bagby, RM, Brown, TA, et al. (2017) ‘The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies.’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology 126 (4): 454–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemoine, M. (2016) ‘Molecular complexity: Why has psychiatry not been revolutionized by genomics (yet)?’ In Boniolo, G and Nathan, M (eds), Foundational Issues in Molecular Medicine. London: Routledge, 81–99.Google Scholar
Lemoine, M. (2013) ‘Defining Disease beyond Conceptual Analysis: An Analysis of Conceptual Analysis in Philosophy of Medicine.’ Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34: 309–25.Google Scholar
Lemoine, M. (2017) ‘Neither From Words, nor From Visions: Understanding P-Medicine From Innovative Treatments. Lato Sensu: Revue de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences 4 (2): 12–23. doi:10.20416/lsrsps.v4i2.793Google Scholar
Lesko, LJ. (2007) ‘Personalized Medicine: Elusive Dream or Imminent Reality?’ Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 81: 807–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis-Fernandez, R, Rotheram-Borus, MJ, Betts, V, Greenman, L, Essock, SM, Escobar, JI, Barch, D, et al. (2016) ‘Rethinking Funding Priorities in Mental Health Research.’ The British Journal of Psychiatry 208 (6): 507–9.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, SO, and Treadway, MT. (2016) ‘Clashing Diagnostic Approaches: DSM-ICD versus RDoC.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 12 (1): 435–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maj, M. (2018) ‘Why the Clinical Utility of Diagnostic Categories in Psychiatry Is Intrinsically Limited and How We Can Use New Approaches to Complement Them.’ World Psychiatry 17 (2): 121–22.Google Scholar
Meigs, JB, Shrader, P, Sullivan, LM, McAteer, JB, Fox, CS, Dupuis, J, Manning, AK, Florez, JC Wilson, PW, SrD’agostino, RB, and Cupples, LA. (2008) ‘Genotype Score in Addition to Common Risk Factors for Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes.’ New England Journal of Medicine 359: 2208–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, GA. (2010) ‘Mistreating Psychology in the Decades of the Brain.’ Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (6): 716–43. doi:10.1177/1745691610388774.Google Scholar
Mishara, AL, and Schwartz, MA. (2013) ‘What Does Phenomology Contribute to the Debate about DSM-5?’ In Paris, J and Philips, J (eds), Making the DSM-5: Concepts and Controversies. New York: Springer, 125–42.Google Scholar
Monteith, S, Glenn, T, Geddes, J, and Bauer, M. (2015) ‘Big Data Are Coming to Psychiatry: A General Introduction.’ International Journal of Bipolar Disorders 3 (1): 21.Google Scholar
Morris, S, and Cuthbert, B. (2012) ‘Research Domain Criteria: Cognitive Systems, Neural Circuits, and Dimensions of Behavior.’ Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 14 (1): 29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, D. (2014) ‘Natural Kinds in Folk Psychology and in Psychiatry.’ In Kincaid, H and Sullivan, JA (eds), Classifying Psychopathology: Mental Kinds and Natural Kinds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 105–22.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. (2015) ‘Concepts of Disease and Health.’ In Zalta, EN (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/health-disease/.Google Scholar
Nature Editorial Board. (2012) ‘Therapy Deficit.’ Nature 489: 473–74.Google Scholar
National Research Council (US) Committee on a Framework for Developing a New Taxonomy of Disease. (2011) ‘Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease.’ Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US).Google Scholar
Need, AC, and Goldstein, DB. (2016) ‘Neuropsychiatric Genomics in Precision Medicine: Diagnostics, Gene Discovery, and Translation.’ Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 18 (3): 237–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olbert, CM, Gala, GJ, and Tupler, LA. (2014) ‘Quantifying Heterogeneity Attributable to Polythetic Diagnostic Criteria: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Application.’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology 123(2): 452–62.Google Scholar
Paranjape, SM, and Mogayzel, PJ. (2018) ‘Cystic Fibrosis in the Era of Precision Medicine.’ Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 25 (January): 64–72.Google Scholar
Parnas, J, and Sass, LA. (2008) ‘Varieties of ‘Phenomenology.’ In Kendler, KS and Parnas, J (eds), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry: Explanation, Phenomenology, and Nosology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 239–77.Google Scholar
Parnas, J, and Henriksen, MG. (2014) ‘Disordered Self in the Schizophrenia Spectrum: A Clinical and Research Perspective.’ Harvard Review of Psychiatry 22 (5): 251–65.Google Scholar
Paulus, MP. (2015) ‘Pragmatism Instead of Mechanism.’ JAMA Psychiatry 72 (7): 631–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrovski, S, Shashi, V, Petrou, S, Schoch, K, McSweeney, KM, Dhindsa, RS, Krueger, B, Crimian, R, Case, LE, Khalid, R, El-Dairi, MA, Jiang, YH, Mikati, MA, Goldstein, DB. (2015) ‘Exome Sequencing Results in Successful Riboflavin Treatment of a Rapidly Progressive Neurological Condition.’ Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies 1 (1):a000257. doi:10.1101/mcs.a000257Google Scholar
Phillips, MR. (2014) ‘Will RDoC Hasten the Decline of America’s Global Leadership Role in Mental Health?’ World Psychiatry 13 (1): 40–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poland, J, and Tekin, S (eds). (2017) Extraordinary Science and Psychiatry: Responses to the Crisis in Mental Health Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prainsack, B. (2015) ‘Through Thick and Big: Data-Rich Medicine in the Era of Personalisation.’ In Vollman, J, Sandow, V, Wäscher, S, and Schildmann, J (eds), The Ethics of Personalised Medicine. Farnham: Ashgate, 161–72.Google Scholar
Radden, J. (2003) ‘Is This Dame Melancholy?: Equating Today’s Depression and Past Melancholia.’ Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 10 (1): 37–52.Google Scholar
Schwartz, SJ, Lilienfeld, SO, Meca, A, and Sauvigné, KC. (2016) ‘The Role of Neuroscience within Psychology: A Call for Inclusiveness over Exclusiveness.’ The American Psychologist 71 (1): 52–70.Google Scholar
Sekar, A, Bialas, AR, de Rivera, H, Davis, A, Hammond, TR, Kamitaki, N, Tooley, K, et al. (2016) ‘Schizophrenia Risk from Complex Variation of Complement Component 4.’ Nature 530 (7589): 177–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senn, S. (2001) ‘Individual Therapy: New Dawn or False Dawn?’ Drug Information Journal 35: 1479–94.Google Scholar
Senn, S. (2018) ‘Statistical Pitfalls of Personalized Medicine.’ Nature 563 (7733): 619–21.Google Scholar
Snyder, M. (2012) ‘Q & A: The Snyderome.’ Genome Biology 13(3): 147.Google Scholar
Sonuga-Barke, EJS. (2014) ‘Editorial: ‘What’s Up, (R)DoC?’ – Can Identifying Core Dimensions of Early Functioning Help Us Understand, and Then Reduce, Developmental Risk for Mental Disorders?’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 55 (8): 849–51. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, PF, Agrawal, A, Bulik, CM, Andreassen, OA, Børglum, AD, Breen, G, Cichon, S, Edenberg, H, et al. (2017) ‘Psychiatric Genomics: An Update and an Agenda.’ American Journal of Psychiatry 175 (1): 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabb, K. (2015) ‘Psychiatric Progress and the Assumption of Diagnostic Discrimination.’ Philosophy of Science 82 (5): 1047–58.Google Scholar
Teachman, BA, McKay, D, Barch, DM, Prinstein, MJ, Hollon, SD, and Chambless, DL. (2019) ‘How Psychosocial Research Can Help the National Institute of Mental Health Achieve Its Grand Challenge to Reduce the Burden of Mental Illnesses and Psychological Disorders.’ The American Psychologist 74 (4): 415–31.Google Scholar
Topol, EJ. (2014) ‘Individualized Medicine from Prewomb to Tomb.’ Cell 157 (1): 241–53.Google Scholar
Wakefield, JC. (2014) ‘Wittgenstein’s Nightmare: Why the RDoC Grid Needs a Conceptual Dimension.’ World Psychiatry 13 (1): 38–40.Google Scholar
Wanders, RBK, van Loo, HM, Vermunt, JK, Meijer, RR, Hartman, CA, Schoevers, RA, Wardenaar, KJ, and de Jonge, P. (2016) ‘Casting Wider Nets for Anxiety and Depression: Disability-Driven Cross-Diagnostic Subtypes in a Large Cohort.’ Psychological Medicine 46 (16): 3371–82.Google Scholar
Whooley, O. (2010) ‘Diagnostic Ambivalence: Psychiatric Workarounds and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.’ Sociology of Health & Fitness 32 (3): 452–69.Google Scholar
van Loo, H, Romeijn, JW, de Jonge, P, and Schoevers, R. (2013) ‘Psychiatric Comorbidity and Causal Disease Models.’ Preventive Medicine 57 (6): 748–52.Google Scholar
Zuberi, SM, and Brunklaus, A. (2018) ‘Epilepsy in 2017: Precision Medicine Drives Epilepsy Classification and Therapy.’ Nature Reviews Neurology 14 (2): 67–68. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.190.Google Scholar

References

Andersen, H. (2016) ‘Reduction in the Biomedical Sciences.’ In Solomon, M., Simon, J., & Kincaid, H. (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Medicine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D, Cramer, A, and Kalis, A. (2018) ‘Brain Disorders? Not Really…: Why Network Structures Block Reductionism in Psychopathology Research.’ Behavior and Brain Sciences 42: 1–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Kendler, KS. (2005) ‘Toward a Philosophical Structure for Psychiatry.’ American Journal of Psychiatry 162 (3): 433–40.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J, Brown, R, Pine, D, and Hofmann, S. (2018, January) ‘Know Thyself: Well-Being and Subjective Experience.’ In Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on Brain Science. New York: Dana Foundation.Google Scholar
Parnas, J and Henriksen, MG. (2014) ‘Disordered Self in the Schizophrenia Spectrum.’ Harvard Review of Psychiatry 22 (5): 251–265.Google Scholar
Preacher, KJ, Rucker, DD, MacCallum, RC, Nicewander, WA. (2005) ‘Use of the Extreme Groups Approach: A Critical Reexamination and New Recommendations.’ Psychological Methods;10 (2):178Google Scholar
Schwartz, SJ, Lilienfeld, SO, Meca, A, and Sauvigné, KC. (2016) ‘The Role of Neuroscience within Psychology: A Call for Inclusiveness over Exclusiveness.’ The American Psychologist 71 (1): 52–70.Google Scholar
Wakefield, JC. (2014) ‘Wittgenstein’s Nightmare: Why the RDoC Grid Needs a Conceptual Dimension.’ World Psychiatry 13 (1): 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) ‘Construct validity in psychological tests.’ Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., van Loo, H. M., Wardenaar, K. J., Bossarte, R. M., Brenner, L. A., Ebert, D. D., … Zaslavsky, A. M. (2017) ‘Using patient self-reports to study heterogeneity of treatment effects in major depressive disorder.’ Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 26(1), 22–36.Google Scholar
MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948)’ On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.’ Psychological Review, 55(2), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meehl, P. E. (1945) ‘The dynamics of “structured” personality tests.’ Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1(4), 296–303.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1954) Clinical versus statistical prediction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1843/1973) A system of logic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., & Robins, E. (1978). Research diagnostic criteria. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35(6), 773–782.Google Scholar
Zachar, P. (2012) ‘Progress and the calibration of scientific constructs: The role of comparative validity.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry II: Nosology-definition of illness, history, validity, and prospects (pp. 21–34). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed). American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Baumeister, H, Parker, G (2012) ‘Meta-review of depressive subtyping models.’ Journal of Affective Disorders 139, 126–140.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N, Hardie, J (2012) Evidence-Based Policy. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalupka, K, Eberhardt, F, Perona, P (2017) ‘Causal feature learning: An overview.’ Behaviormetrika 44, 137–164.Google Scholar
Claeskens, G, Hjort, N (2008) Model Selection and Model Averaging. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Eaton, WW, Shao, H, Nestadt, G, Lee, BH, Bienvenu, OJ, Zandi, P (2008) ‘Population-based study of first onset and chronicity in major depressive disorder.’ Archives of General Psychiatry 65, 513–520.Google Scholar
Eronen, MI (2019) ‘The levels problem in psychopathology.’ Psychological Medicine, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719002514Google Scholar
First, MB, Kendler, KS, Leibenluft, E (2017) ‘The future of the DSM Implementing a continuous improvement model.’ JAMA Psychiatry 74, 115.Google Scholar
Glymour, C, Spirtes, P, Scheines, R (2001) Causation, Prediction, and Search (2nd ed). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Grove, WM, Meehl, PE (1996) ‘Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.’ Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hájek, A (2007) ‘The reference class problem is your problem too.’ Synthese 156, 185–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, SR, McKinley, JC (1940) ‘A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): Construction of the schedule.’ Journal of Psychology 10, 249–254.Google Scholar
James, G, Witten, D, Hastie, T, Tibshirani, R (2013) An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS (2013) ‘A history of the DSM-5 scientific review committee.’ Psychological Medicine 43, 1793–1800.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS (2014) ‘The structure of psychiatric science.’ The American Journal of Psychiatry 171, 931–938.Google Scholar
Kessler, RC, van Loo, HM, Wardenaar, KJ, Bossarte, RM, Brenner, LA, Cai, T, Ebert, DD, Hwang, I, Li, J, de Jonge, P, Nierenberg, AA, Petukhova, M V, Rosellini, AJ, Sampson, NA, Schoevers, RA, Wilcox, MA, Zaslavsky, AM (2016) ‘Testing a machine-learning algorithm to predict the persistence and severity of major depressive disorder from baseline self-reports.’ Molecular Psychiatry 21, 1366–1371.Google Scholar
Kessler, RC, Ustun, TB (eds) (2008) The WHO World Mental Health Surveys: Global Perspectives on the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Kupfer, DJ, Regier, DA, Kuhl, EA (2008) ‘On the road to DSM-V and ICD-11.’ European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258, 2–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Loo, HM, Cai, T, Gruber, MJ, Li, J, de Jonge, P, Petukhova, M, Rose, S, Sampson, NA, Schoevers, RA, Wardenaar, KJ, Wilcox, MA, Al-Hamzawi, AO, Andrade, LH, Bromet, EJ, Bunting, B, Fayyad, J, Florescu, SE, Gureje, O, Hu, C, Huang, Y, Levinson, D, Medina-Mora, ME, Nakane, Y, Posada-Villa, J, Scott, KM, Xavier, M, Zarkov, Z, Kessler, RC (2014) ‘Major depressive disorder subtypes to predict long-term course.’ Depression and Anxiety 31, 765–777.Google Scholar
Lubke, GH, Muthén, B (2005) ‘Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models.’ Psychological Methods 10(1), 21–39.Google Scholar
Meehl, PE (1956). ‘Wanted—a good cook-book.’ American Psychologist, 11(6), 263–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0044164Google Scholar
Morgan, M, Morrison, M (1999) Models as Mediators. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandi, A, Beard, JR, Galea, S (2009) ‘Epidemiologic heterogeneity of common mood and anxiety disorders over the lifecourse in the general population: A systematic review.’ BMC Psychiatry 9, 31.Google Scholar
Olbert, CM, Gala, GJ, Tupler, LA (2014) ‘Quantifying heterogeneity attributable to polythetic diagnostic criteria: Theoretical framework and empirical application.’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology 123(2), 452–462.Google Scholar
Pearl, J (2000) Causality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.,Google Scholar
Pearl, J (2018) The Book of Why. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H (1949) The Theory of Probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Roy-Byrne, PP, Stang, P, Wittchen, H-U, Ustun, B, Walters, EE, Kessler, RC (2000) ‘Lifetime panic–depression comorbidity in the National Comorbidity Survey.’ British Journal of Psychiatry 176, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabb, K. (2015) ‘Psychiatric progress and the assumption of diagnostic discrimination.’ Philosophy of Science 82, 1047–1058.Google Scholar
Tabb, K. (2017) ‘Philosophy of psychiatry after diagnostic kinds.’ Synthese 196(6), 2177–2195. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1659-6.Google Scholar
Wardenaar, KJ, van Loo, HM, Cai, T, Fava, M, Gruber, MJ, Li, J, de Jonge, P, Nierenberg, AA, Pethukova, M V, Rose, S, Sampson, NA, Schoevers, RA, Wilcox, MA, Alonso, J, Bromet, EJ, Bunting, B, Florescu, SE, Fukao, A, Gureje, O, Hu, C, Huang, YQ, Karam, AN, Levinson, D, Medina-Mora, ME, Posada-Villa, J, Scott, KM, Taib, NI, Viana, MC, Xavier, M, Zarkov, Z, Kessler, RC (2014) ‘The effects of co-morbidity in defining major depression subtypes associated with long-term course and severity.’ Psychological Medicine 44, 3289–3302.Google Scholar

References

Hull, CL (1943). Principles of behaviour (Vol. 422). New York: Appleton-century-croftsGoogle Scholar
MacCorquodale, K, & Meehl, PE (1948) ‘On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.’ Psychological Review, 55(2), 95.Google Scholar
van Loo, HM, Cai, T, Gruber, MJ, Li, J, de Jonge, P, Petukhova, M, Rose, S, Sampson, NA, Schoevers, RA, Wardenaar, KJ, Wilcox, MA, Al-Hamzawi, AO, Andrade, LH, Bromet, EJ, Bunting, B, Fayyad, J, Florescu, SE, Gureje, O, Hu, C, Huang, Y, Levinson, D, Medina-Mora, ME, Nakane, Y, Posada-Villa, J, Scott, KM, Xavier, M, Zarkov, Z, & Kessler, RC (2014) ‘Major depressive disorder subtypes to predict long-term course.’ Depression and Anxiety, 31, 765–777.Google Scholar

References

Aaronson, C. J., Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., & Gunderson, J. G. (2006) ‘Comparison of attachment styles in borderline personality disorder and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.’ Psychiatric Quarterly, 77(1), 69–80.Google Scholar
Bender, D. S., & Skodol, A. E. (2007) ‘Borderline personality as self-other representational disturbance.’ Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(5), 500–517.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970) ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes.’ In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016) ‘Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093.Google Scholar
Morey, L. C., & Bender, D. S. (2014) ‘Articulating a core dimension of personality pathology.’ In Oldham, J. M., Skodol, A. E., & Bender, D. S. (Eds.), The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of personality disorders (2nd ed., pp. 39–54). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1988) ‘Five kinds of self‐knowledge.’ Philosophical Psychology, 1(1), 35–59.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (1993) Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1956) ‘Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.’ In Feigl, H. & Scriven, M. (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 1, pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Bach, B., Lee, C., Mortensen, E. L., & Simonsen, E. (2016) ‘How do DSM-5 personality traits align with schema therapy constructs?’ Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(4), 502–529.Google Scholar
Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., First, M. B., & Oldham, J. M. (2018) Structured clinical interview for the alternative model for personality disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) – Module I – Structured clinical interview for the level of personality functioning scale. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Lau, H., & LeDoux, J. E. (2019) ‘Understanding the Higher-Order Approach to Consciousness.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 23(9):754–768. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.009Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. (1995) ‘Facing up to the problem of consciousness.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2014) Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011) ‘Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing.’ Neuron, 70(2), 200–227.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Charles, L., King, J. R., & Marti, S. (2014) ‘Toward a computational theory of conscious processing.’ Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25, 76–84.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Lau, H., & Kouider, S. (2017) ‘What is consciousness, and could machines have it?’ Science, 358(6362), 486–492.Google Scholar
Drislane, L. E., Brislin, S. J., Jones, S., & Patrick, C. J. (2018) ‘Interfacing five-factor model and triarchic conceptualizations of psychopathy.’ Psychological Assessment, 30(6), 834–840.Google Scholar
Fanselow, M. S., & Pennington, Z. T. (2017) ‘The danger of LeDoux and Pine’s two-system framework for fear.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(11), 1120–1121.Google Scholar
Fanselow, M. S., & Pennington, Z. T. (2018) ‘A return to the psychiatric dark ages with a two-system framework for fear.’ Behaviour Research and Therapy, 100, 24–29.Google Scholar
Frith, C., Perry, R., & Lumer, E. (1999) ‘The neural correlates of conscious experience: An experimental framework.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(3), 105–114.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2000) ‘Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14–21.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S., & Shear, J. (1999) Models of the self. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890) The principles of psychology. New York: H. Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Katsuki, F., & Constantinidis, C. (2014) ‘Bottom-up and top-down attention: Different processes and overlapping neural systems.’ Neuroscientist, 20(5), 509–521.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., & Schaffner, K. F. (2011) ‘The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: An historical and philosophical analysis.’ Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology (PPP), 18(1), 41–63.Google Scholar
Knopik, V. S., Neiderhiser, J. M., Plomin, R., & DeFries, J. C. (2017) Behavioral genetics (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970) ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes.’ In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge, England: University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016) ‘Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Brown, R. (2017) ‘A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114(10), E2016–E2025.Google Scholar
Lycan, W. (2004). The superiority of HOP to HOT. In Gennaro, R. (Ed.), Higher-order theories of consciousness (pp. 115–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lynam, D. R., Loehr, A., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2012) ‘A five-factor measure of avoidant personality: The FFAvA.’ Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 466–474.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (2000). On clear and confused ideas : An essay about substance concepts. Cambridge, England; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, E. A., Wise, S. P., & Graham, K. S. (2017) The evolution of memory systems: Ancestors, anatomy, and adaptations (1st ed.). Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1988) ‘Five kinds of self knowledge.’ Philosophical Psychology, 1, 35–59.Google Scholar
Newman, G. E., Bloom, P., & Knobe, J. (2014) ‘Value judgments and the true self.’ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 203–216.Google Scholar
Nostro, A. D., Muller, V. I., Varikuti, D. P., Plaschke, R. N., Hoffstaedter, F., Langner, R., … Eickhoff, S. B. (2018) ‘Predicting personality from network-based resting-state functional connectivity.’ Brain Structure and Function, 223(6), 2699–2719.Google Scholar
Parnas, J. (2011) ‘A disappearing heritage: The clinical core of schizophrenia.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37(6), 1121–1130.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Moller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., & Zahavi, D. (2005) ‘EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience.’ Psychopathology, 38(5), 236–258.Google Scholar
Pine, D. S., & LeDoux, J. E. (2017) ‘Elevating the role of subjective experience in the clinic: Response to Fanselow and Pennington.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(11), 1121–1122.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. (2002) Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. (2012) The conscious brain: How attention engenders experience. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raffman, D. (1995). ‘On the persistence of phenomenology.’ In Metzinger, T. (Ed.), Conscious experience. Paderborn: Schöningh/Imprint AcademicGoogle Scholar
Rosenstrom, T., Gjerde, L. C., Krueger, R. F., Aggen, S. H., Czajkowski, N. O., Gillespie, N. A., … Ystrom, E. (2018) ‘Joint factorial structure of psychopathology and personality.’ Psychological Medicine, 1–10.Google Scholar
Saurat, W., & Lycan, W. (2014). Attention and internal monitoring: A farewell to HOP. Analysis, 74 (3), 363–370Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (1992a) ‘Theory change in immunology. Part I: Extended theories and scientific progress.’ Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 13(2), 175–189.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (1992b) ‘Theory change in immunology. Part II: The clonal selection theory.’ Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 13(2), 191–216.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (1993) Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2016) Behaving: What’s genetic and what’s not, and why should we care. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2017) ‘Neuroethics, free will, self-identity, and neuromodulation.’ Cerebrum. https://www.dana.org/article/the-first-neuroethics-meeting-then-and-nowGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2019) ‘Comments on Pine.’ In Kendler, K. S., Parnas, J., & Zachar, P. (Eds.), Copenhagen-V. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2020a) – Construct Validity in Psychology and Psychiatry (to be submitted; available on request to the author).Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2020b) ‘A comparison of two neurobiological models of fear and anxiety: A “construct validity” application?’. Perspectives on Psychological Science, under review.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (in development) Choosing: What Can We Learn about Choice and Flourishing from Behavioral Neurogenetics.Google Scholar
Skodol, A. E. (2018) ‘Can personality disorders be redefined in personality trait terms?’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(7), 590–592.Google Scholar
Strohminger, N., Knobe, J., & Newman, G. (2017) ‘The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self.’ Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 551–560.Google Scholar
Tekin, S. (2016). ‘The missing self in scientific psychiatry.’ Synthese, 196(6), 2197–2215.Google Scholar
Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., & Koch, C. (2016) ‘Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate.’ Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450–461.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (2005) ‘Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human?’ In Terrace, H. S. & Metcalfe, J. (Eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness (pp. ix, 364pp., 368 leaves of plates). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Cruijsen, R., Peters, S., & Crone, E. A. (2017) ‘Neural correlates of evaluating self and close-other in physical, academic and prosocial domains.’ Brain and Cognition, 118, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, L. K., Sequeira, S., Britton, J. C., Brotman, M. A., Gold, A. L., Berman, E., … Pine, D. S. (2017) ‘Complementary features of attention bias modification therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in pediatric anxiety disorders.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(8), 775–784.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Bach, B., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. A., DeYoung, C., Hopwood, C. J., … Thomas, K. M. (2019) ‘Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP.’ Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(4), 345–355.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., Krueger, R. F., & Kendler, K. S. (2016) ‘Personality disorder in DSM-5: An oral history.’ Psychological Medicine, 46(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2000) Exploring the self: Philosophical and psychopathological perspectives on self-experience. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2005) Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2014a) Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2014b) Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2018) The Oxford handbook of the history of phenomenology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Baluška, F., & Levin, M. (2016) ‘On having no head: Cognition throughout biological systems.’ Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 902. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00902Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (2008) Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F. (2007) Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970) ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes.’ In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Brown, R. (2017) ‘A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, E2016–E2025.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016) ‘Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 1083–1093.Google Scholar
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000) ‘Thinking about mechanisms.’ Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1988) ‘Five kinds of self-knowledge.’ Philosophical Psychology, 1, 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacter, D. L. (1996) Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) ‘Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain.’ Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 657–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sellars, W. (1956) ‘Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.’ In Feigl, H. & Scriven, M. (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. I. The foundations of science and the concepts of psychology and psychoanalysis (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. A. (2007) ‘Bacteria are small but not stupid: Cognition, natural genetic engineering and socio-bacteriology.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38, 807–819.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1983) Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Woodward, J. (2003) Making Things Happen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS, Campbell, J. (2009) ‘Interventionist causal models in psychiatry: Repositioning the mind–body problem.’ Psychological Medicine; 39:881–887.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS. (2012) ‘Decision making in the pathway from genes to psychiatric and substance use disorders.’ Molecular Psychiatry; 18:640–645.Google Scholar

References

Batterman, R. (forthcoming) ‘Multiscale Modeling in Inactive and Active Materials.’Google Scholar
Batterman, R. (2019) ‘Universality and RG Explanations.’ Perspectives on Science 27(1):26–47.Google Scholar
Chalupka, K. Eberhardt, F., and Perona, P. (2017) ‘Causal Feature Learning: An Overview.’ Behaviormetrika 44:137–164.Google Scholar
Craver, C. (2007) Explaining the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craver, C. and Bechtel, W. (2007) ‘Top-down Causation without Top-Down Causes.’ Biology and Philosophy 22:547–563.Google Scholar
Eronen, M. I. (2015) ‘Levels of Organization: A Deflationary Account.’ Biology and Philosophy 30(1):39–58.Google Scholar
Glymour, M., Veling, W., and Susser, E. (2011) ‘Integrating Knowledge of Genetic and Environmental Pathways to Complete the Developmental Map.’ In Kendler, K., Jaffee, S., and Romer, D. (eds.), The Dynamic Genome and Mental Health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. and Campbell, J. (2009) ‘Interventionist Causal Models in Psychiatry: Repositioning the Mind–Body Problem.’ Psychological Medicine 39(6):881–887.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. (2011) ‘A Conceptual Overview of Gene-Environment Interaction and Correlation in a Developmental Context.’ In Kendler, K., Jaffee, S., and Romer, D. (eds.), The Dynamic Genome and Mental Health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heil, J. (2017) ‘Downward Causation.’ In Paoletti, M. and Orilia, F. (eds.), Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation. New York: Routledge, 42–53.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2000) ‘Causation as Influence.’ Reprinted in Collins, J., Hall, N., and Paul, L. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noble, D. (2006) The Music of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, P. and Putnam, H. (1958) ‘The Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.’ In Feigl, H., Scriven, M., and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–36.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1994) ‘The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets.’ In Matthen, M. and Ware, R. (eds.), Biology and Society: Reflections on Methodology, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 20. Calgary: The University of Calgary Press, 207–274.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2018) Physics Avoidance: Essays in Conceptual Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2003) Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2015) ‘Interventionism and Causal Exclusion.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91:303–347.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (Forthcoming) ‘Explanatory Autonomy: The Role of Proportionality, Stability, and Conditional Irrelevance.’ Synthese.Google Scholar

References

Alzheimer, A. (1907) ‘Über eine eigenartige Erkrankung der Hirnrinde’, Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, 64, 146–48.Google Scholar
Bekris, L. M., et al. (2010) ‘Genetics of Alzheimer disease’, Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 23 (4), 213–27.Google Scholar
Braak, H. and Braak, E. (1991) ‘Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes’, Acta Neuropathologica, 82 (4), 239–59.Google Scholar
De Jager, P. L., Yang, H. S., and Bennett, D. A. (2018) ‘Deconstructing and targeting the genomic architecture of human neurodegeneration’, Nature Neuroscience, 21 (10), 1310–17.Google Scholar
Elahi, F. M. and Miller, B. L. (2017) ‘A clinicopathological approach to the diagnosis of dementia’, Nature Reviews Neurology, 13 (8), 457–76.Google Scholar
Glenner, G. G. and Wong, C. W. (1984) ‘Alzheimer’s disease: Initial report of the purification and characterization of a novel cerebrovascular amyloid protein’, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 120 (3), 885–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampel, H., et al. (2017) ‘A Precision Medicine Initiative for Alzheimer’s disease: The road ahead to biomarker-guided integrative disease modeling’, Climacteric, 20 (2), 107–18.Google Scholar
Mehta, D., et al. (2017) ‘Why do trials for Alzheimer’s disease drugs keep failing? A discontinued drug perspective for 2010–2015’, Expert Opinion on Investigative Drugs, 26 (6), 735–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, R. E. (2012) ‘The genetics of Alzheimer disease’, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 2 (10), a006296. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006296Google Scholar
Vergallo, A., et al. (2018) ‘The cholinergic system in the pathophysiology and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease’, Brain, 141 (7), 1917–33.Google Scholar

References

Berrios, G. E. (1996) The history of mental symptoms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Cramer, A., & Kalis, A. (2018) ‘Brain disorders? Not really… Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, 1–54.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1958) Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2013) ‘A history of the DSM-5 scientific review committee.’ Psychological Medicine, 43, 1793–1800.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2018) ‘The development of Kraepelin’s mature diagnostic concepts of paranoia (Die Verrücktheit) and paranoid dementia praecox (Dementia Paranoides): A close reading of his textbooks from 1887 to 1899.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 75(12), 1280–1288.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2019) ‘The genealogy of dementia praecox I: Signs and symptoms of delusional psychoses from 1880 to 1900.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45, 296–304.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

References

Albrecht, F. M. (1970) ‘A reappraisal of faculty psychology.’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 6, 36–40.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association. (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Berrios, G. E. (1987) ‘Historical aspects of psychoses: 19th century issues.’ British Medical Bulletin, 43, 484–498.Google Scholar
Berrios, G. E. & Hauser, R. (1988) ‘The early development of Kraepelin’s ideas on classification: A conceptual history.’ Psychological Medicine, 18, 813–821.Google Scholar
Brooks, G. P. (1976) ‘The faculty psychology of Thomas Reid.’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 12, 65–77.Google Scholar
Cullen, W. (1808) A Methodical System of Nosology. Translated from Latin by Dr. Lewis, Eldad. Stockbridge, MA: Cornelius Sturtevant.Google Scholar
Eigen, J. P. (2016) Mad-Doctors in the Dock: Defending the Diagnosis, 1760–1913 (1st ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Engstrom, E. J. (2003) Clinical Psychiatry in Imperial Germany: A History of Psychiatric Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. (1987) Console and Classify: The French Psychiatric Profession in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. (1987) The Oxford Companion to the Mind. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griesinger, W. (1867) Mental Pathology and Therapeutics. London: The New Sydenham Society.Google Scholar
Grob, G. N. (2011) The Mad among Us: A History of the Care of America’s Mentally Ill (1st ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, W. A. (1883) A Treatise on Insanity in Its Medical Relations. New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. (1980) ‘The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation.’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107–117.Google Scholar
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. et al. (2010) ‘Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2016a) ‘Phenomenology of schizophrenia and the representativeness of modern diagnostic criteria.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 73, 1082–1092.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2016b) ‘The phenomenology of major depression and the representativeness and nature of DSM criteria.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 771–780.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2016c) ‘The phenomenology of schizophrenia and the representativeness of modern diagnostic criteria.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 73(10), 1082.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2017a) ‘The clinical features of mania and their representation in modern diagnostic criteria.’ Psychological Medicine, 47, 1013–1029.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2017b) ‘The clinical features of paranoia in the 20th century and their representation in diagnostic criteria from DSM-III through DSM-5.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43, 332–343.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2018) ‘The development of Kraepelin’s mature diagnostic concepts of paranoia (Die Verrücktheit) and paranoid dementia Praecox (Dementia Paranoides): A close reading of his textbooks from 1887 to 1899.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 75(12), 1280–1288.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1899) Psychiatrie: Ein Lehrbuch fur Studirende und Aerzte (6th ed., 2 vols.). Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1987) Memoirs. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1990) Psychiatry: A Textbook for Students and Physicians (Volume 2: Clinical Psychiatry), Quen, J. (ed.) (Translation of the 6th Edition of Psychiatrie, Translator Volume 2 – Sabine Ayed). Canton, MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Müller-Freienfels, R. (1935) The Evolution of Modern Psychology (1st ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Noble, D. (1853) Elements of Psychological Medicine: An Introduction to the Practical Study of Insanity, Adapted for Students and Junior Practitioners. London: John Churchill.Google Scholar
Radden, J. (1996) ‘Lumps and bumps: Kantian faculty psychology, phrenology, and twentieth-century psychiatric classification.’ Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 3, 1–14.Google Scholar
Scholz, F. (1892) Lehrbuch der Irrenheilkunde: Für Aerzte und Studirende. Leipzig: Eduard Heinrich Mayer (Einhorn & Jäger).Google Scholar
Scull, A. (2005) Most Solitary of Afflictions: Madness and Society in Britain, 1700–1900. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wyman, R. (1830) A Discourse on Mental Philosophy as Connected with Mental Disease: Delivered Before the Massachusetts Medical Society, June 2, 1830. Boston, MA: Daily Advertiser.Google Scholar

References

American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Andreasen, N.C. (1984) The broken brain: The biological revolution in psychiatry. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Cramer, A.O.J., & Kalis, A. (2019) ‘Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, e2: 1–63.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B.N. (2014) ‘The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology.’ World Psychiatry, 13, 28–35.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B.N., & Insel, T R. (2010) ‘Toward new approaches to psychotic disorders: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria project.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 1061–1062.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B.N., & Insel, T.R. (2013) ‘Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC.’ BMC Medicine, 11, 126.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B.N., & Kozak, M.J. (2013) ‘Constructing constructs for psychopathology: The NIMH research domain criteria.’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 928–937.Google Scholar
Frances, A. (2013) Saving normal: An insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Frances, A. (2014) ‘RDoC is necessary, but very oversold.’ World Psychiatry, 13, 47–49.Google Scholar
Heller, W. (1993) ‘Neuropsychological mechanisms of individual differences in emotion, personality, and arousal.’ Neuropsychology, 7, 476–489.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1738) Treatise of human nature. Book 2. Of passions. Part 3. Section 3. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treatise_of_Human_Nature/Book_2:_Of_the_passions/Part_3/Section_3, accessed 06/29/19.Google Scholar
Hyman, S.E. (2010) ‘The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155–179.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R. (2014) ‘The NIMH research domain criteria (RDoC) project: Precision medicine for psychiatry.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 395–397.Google Scholar
Insel, T.R., Cuthbert, B.N., Garvey, M.A., Heinssen, R.K., Pine, D.S., Quinn, K.J., … Wang, P.S. (2010) ‘Research domain criteria: Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748–751.Google Scholar
Keating, P., & Cambrosio, A. (2004) ‘Does biomedicine entail the successful reduction of pathology to biology?’ Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 47, 357–371.Google Scholar
Kozak, M.J., & Cuthbert, B.N. (2016) ‘The NIMH research domain criteria initiative: Background, issues, and pragmatics.’ Psychophysiology, 53, 286–297.Google Scholar
Lake, J.I., Yee, C.M., & Miller, G.A. (2017) ‘Misunderstanding RDoC.’ Mechanisms of mental disorders special issue. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225, 170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P.J. (1984) ‘Dead souls: Or why the neurobehavioral science of emotion should pay attention to cognitive science.’ In Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (Eds.), Self-regulation of the brain and behavior (pp. 255–272). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (1990) ‘Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex.’ Psychological Review, 97, 377–395.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S.O., & Treadway, M.T. (2016) ‘Clashing diagnostic approaches: DSM-ICD versus RDoC.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 435–463.Google Scholar
Meehl, P.E. (1978) ‘Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald and the slow progress of soft psychology.’ Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A. (1996) ‘How we think about cognition, emotion, and biology in psychopathology.’ Psychophysiology, 33, 615–628.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A. (2004) ‘Another quasi-thirty years of slow progress.’ Applied and Preventive Psychology: Current Scientific Perspectives, 11, 61–64.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A. (2010) ‘Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain.’ Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716–743.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A., Crocker, L.D., Spielberg, J.M., Infantolino, Z.P, & Heller, W. (2013) ‘Issues in localization of brain function: The case of lateralized frontal cortex in cognition, emotion, and psychopathology.’ Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 7, 2.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A., & Keller, J. (2000) ‘Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 212–215.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A., Rockstroh, B.S., Hamilton, H.K., & Yee, C.M. (2016) ‘Psychophysiology as a core strategy in RDoC.’ Psychophysiology, 53, 410–414.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A., & Yee, C.M. (2015) ‘Moving psychopathology forward.’ Psychological Inquiry, 26, 263–267.Google Scholar
Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957) The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1980) ‘A circumplex model of affect.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2003) ‘Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.’ Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.Google Scholar
Sanislow, C.A., Pine, D.S., Quinn, K.J., Kozak, M.J., Garvey, M.A., Heinssen, R.K., … Cuthbert, B.N. (2010) ‘Developing constructs for psychopathology research: Research domain criteria.’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 631–639.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S.J., Lilienfeld, S.O., Meca, A., & Sauvigné, K.C. (2016) ‘The role of neuroscience within psychology: A call for inclusiveness over exclusiveness.’ American Psychologist, 71, 52–70.Google Scholar
Sharp, P.B., & Eldar, E. (2019) ‘Computational models of anxiety: Nascent efforts and future directions.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 170–176.Google Scholar
Sharp, P.B., & Miller, G.A. (2019) ‘Reduction and autonomy in psychology and neuroscience: A call for pragmatism.’ Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39, 18–31.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.G., & Sharp, P.B. (2019) ‘Mechanistic science: A new approach to comprehensive psychopathology research that relates psychological and biological phenomena.’ Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 196–215.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985) ‘Toward a consensual structure of mood.’ Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.Google Scholar
Yee, C.M., Javitt, D.C., & Miller, G.A. (2015) ‘Replacing DSM categorical analyses with dimensional analyses in psychiatry research: The research domain criteria initiative.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 72, 1159–1160.Google Scholar
Zachar, P. (2006) ‘The classification of emotion and scientific realism.’ Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26, 120–138.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., & Ellis, R. D. (Eds.). (2012) Categorical versus dimensional models of affect: A seminar of the theories of Panksepp and Russell. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., Krueger, R. F., & Kendler, K. S. (2016) ‘Personality disorder in DSM-5: An oral history.’ Psychological Medicine, 46, 1–10.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., Regier, D.A., & Kendler, K. (2019) ‘The aspirations for a paradigm shift in DSM-5: An oral history.’ Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 207(9), 778–784.Google Scholar

References

Allen, P., Modinos, G., Hubl, D., Shields, G., Cachia, A., Jardri, R., … Hoffman, R. (2012) ‘Neuroimaging auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: From neuroanatomy to neurochemistry and beyond.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38(4), 695–703.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Andreasen, N. C. (2007) ‘DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: An example of unintended consequences.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33(1), 108–112.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (2017) ‘Editorial perspective: Neurodiversity – A revolutionary concept for autism and psychiatry.’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(6), 744–747.Google Scholar
Baxter, L. R. Jr., Phelps, M. E., Mazziotta, J. C., Guze, B. H., Schwartz, J. M., & Selin, C. E. (1987) ‘Local cerebral glucose metabolic rates in obsessive-compulsive disorder. A comparison with rates in unipolar depression and in normal controls [published erratum appears in Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987 Sep;44(9):800] [see comments].’ Archives of General Psychiatry, 44(3), 211–218.Google Scholar
Binswanger, L. (1957) Der Mensch in der Psychiatrie. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar
Bracken, P., Thomas, P., Timimi, S., Asen, E., Behr, G., Beuster, C., … Yeomans, D. (2012) ‘Psychiatry beyond the current paradigm.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 201(6), 430–434.Google Scholar
Brewer, A. A., & Barton, B. (2016) ‘Maps of the auditory cortex.’ Annual Review of Neuroscience, 39, 385–407.Google Scholar
Broome, M. R., Harland, R., Owen, G. S., & Stringaris, A. (Eds.). (2013) The Maudsley reader in phenomenological psychiatry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chung, J. Y., & Insel, T. R. (2014) ‘Mind the gap: Neuroscience literacy and the next generation of psychiatrists.’ Academic Psychiatry, 38(2), 121–123.Google Scholar
Dierks, T., Linden, D. E., Jandl, M., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., Lanfermann, H., & Singer, W. (1999) ‘Activation of Heschl’s gyrus during auditory hallucinations.’ Neuron, 22(3), 615–621.Google Scholar
Engel, G. L. (1980) ‘The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 137(5), 535–544.Google ScholarPubMed
Engstrom, E. J. (2004) Clinical psychiatry in imperial Germany: A history of psychiatric practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984) ‘What is enlightenment?’ In Rabinow, P. (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2006) Psychiatric power. Lectures at the College de France, 1973–1974. New York City: Picador.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2014) ‘Brain mythologies. Jasper’s critique of reductionism from a current perspective.’ In Fuchs, T. (Ed.), Karl Jasper’s philosophy and psychopathology (pp. 75–84). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Fusar-Poli, P. (2015) ‘The enduring search for the Koplik spots of psychosis.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 72(9), 863–864.Google Scholar
Fusar-Poli, P., Hijazi, Z., Stahl, D., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2018) ‘The science of prognosis in psychiatry: A review.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 75(12), 1280–1288.Google Scholar
Ghaemi, S. N. (2003) The concepts of psychiatry: A pluralistic approach to the mind and mental illness. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Havens, L. (2005) Psychiatric movements. From sects to science. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Heckers, S. (2017) ‘Project for a scientific psychiatry: Neuroscience literacy.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 74(4), 315.Google Scholar
Helmers, S. L., Phillips, V. L., & Esper, G. J. (2010) ‘Translational medicine in neurology: The time is right.’ Archives of Neurology, 67(10), 1263–1266.Google Scholar
Honig, L. S. (2012) ‘Translational research in neurology: Dementia.’ Archives of Neurology, 69(8), 969–977.Google Scholar
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., … Wang, P. (2010) ‘Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.’ The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748–751.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R., & Quirion, R. (2005) ‘Psychiatry as a clinical neuroscience discipline.’ JAMA, 294(17), 2221–2224.Google Scholar
Jardri, R., Pouchet, A., Pins, D., & Thomas, P. (2011) ‘Cortical activations during auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia: A coordinate-based meta-analysis.’ The American Journal of Psychiatry, 168(1), 73–81.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1913) Allgemeine Psychopathologie (9th ed., 1973). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Jones-Davis, D. M., & Macdonald, R. L. (2003) ‘GABA(A) receptor function and pharmacology in epilepsy and status epilepticus.’ Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 3(1), 12–18.Google Scholar
Jutel, A. (2009) ‘Sociology of diagnosis: A preliminary review.’ Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(2), 278–299.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1784) ‘Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?’ Berlinische Monatsschrift, 12, 481–494.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (1990) ‘Toward a scientific psychiatric nosology. Strengths and limitations.’ Archives of General Psychiatry, 47(10), 969–973.Google Scholar
Kraemer, H. C. (2013) ‘Validity and psychiatric diagnoses.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 70(2), 138–139.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1913) Psychiatrie. Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Ärzte. Achte, vollständig umgearbeitete Auflage. 3. Band. Klinische Psychiatrie. 2. Teil. Leipzig: Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
Linscott, R. J., & van Os, J. (2013) ‘An updated and conservative systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence on psychotic experiences in children and adults: On the pathway from proneness to persistence to dimensional expression across mental disorders.’ Psychological Medicine, 43(6), 1133–1149.Google Scholar
Luhrmann, T. M. (2001) Of two minds: The growing disorder in American psychiatry. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Makari, G. J. (2008) Revolution in mind: The creation of psychoanalysis. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. J., Saha, S., Al-Hamzawi, A., Alonso, J., Bromet, E. J., Bruffaerts, R., … Kessler, R. C. (2015) ‘Psychotic experiences in the general population: A cross-national analysis based on 31,261 respondents from 18 countries.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 72(7), 697–705.Google Scholar
McHugh, P. R., & Slavney, P. R. (1998) The perspectives of psychiatry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Obeso, J. A., Stamelou, M., Goetz, C. G., Poewe, W., Lang, A. E., Weintraub, D., … Stoessl, A. J. (2017) ‘Past, present, and future of Parkinson’s disease: A special essay on the 200th anniversary of the shaking palsy.’ Movement Disorders, 32(9), 1264–1310.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Sass, L. A., & Zahavi, D. (2013) ‘Rediscovering psychopathology: The epistemology and phenomenology of the psychiatric object.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(2), 270–277.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1951) The social system. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. F., 3rd, Lewis, D. A., Detre, T., Schatzberg, A. F., & Kupfer, D. J. (2009) ‘The future of psychiatry as clinical neuroscience.’ Academic Medicine, 84(4), 446–450.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, C. E. (2006) ‘Contested boundaries: Psychiatry, disease, and diagnosis.’ Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49(3), 407–424.Google Scholar
Sass, L. A. (2007) ‘‘Schizophrenic person’ or ‘person with schizophrenia’?’ Theory & Psychology, 17(3), 395–420.Google Scholar
Schmitt, W. (1983) ‘Das Modell der Naturwissenschaft in der Psychiatrie im Übergang vom 19. zum 20. Jahrhundert.’ Berichte der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 8, 89–101.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. (1919) ‘Reine Psychiatrie, symptomatische Psychiatrie und Neurologie.’ Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 49, 159–166.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. (1959) Clinical psychopathology. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Slade, M. (2017) ‘Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.’ World Psychiatry, 16(2), 146–153.Google Scholar
Slade, M., Amering, M., Farkas, M., Hamilton, B., O’Hagan, M., Panther, G., … Whitley, R. (2014) ‘Uses and abuses of recovery: Implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems.’ World Psychiatry, 13(1), 12–20.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. (2015) Making medical knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strik, W., & Dierks, T. (2011) Biologische Psychopathologie. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Szasz, T. S. (1961) The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005) ‘Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355–380.Google Scholar
Waters, F., Allen, P., Aleman, A., Fernyhough, C., Woodward, T. S., Badcock, J. C., … Laroi, F. (2012) ‘Auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia and nonschizophrenia populations: A review and integrated model of cognitive mechanisms.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38(4), 683–692.Google Scholar
Wernicke, C. (1880) Über den wissenschaftlichen Standpunkt in der Psychiatrie. Kassel: Fischer.Google Scholar
Wernicke, C. (2000) Grundriss der Psychiatrie. Nijmegen: Arts & Boeve Verlag.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (1992) ICD-10 classifications of mental and behavioural disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Zolnierek, C. D. (2011) ‘Exploring lived experiences of persons with severe mental illness: A review of the literature.’ Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 32(1), 46–72.Google Scholar

References

Slade, M. (2017) ‘Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.’ World Psychiatry, 16, 146–153.Google Scholar
Slade, M., Amering, M., Farkas, M., Hamilton, B., O’Hagan, M., Panther, G. et al. (2014) ‘Uses and abuses of recovery: Implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems.’ World Psychiatry, 13, 12–20.Google Scholar

References

Turkheimer, E. (2015) ‘The nature of nature.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry III: The Nature and Sources of Historical Change (pp. 227–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. (2017) ‘The hard question in psychiatric nosology.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry IV: Classification of Psychiatric Illness (pp. 27–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Boyle, E. A., Li, Y. I., & Pritchard, J. K. (2017) ‘An expanded view of complex traits: From polygenic to omnigenic.’ Cell, 169(7), 1177–1186.Google Scholar
Carnaby, G. A., & Wood, E. J. (1989) ‘The physics of carpets.’ Journal of the Textile Institute, 80(1), 71–90.Google Scholar
Chabris, C. F., Lee, J. J., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J., & Laibson, D. I. (2015) ‘The fourth law of behavior genetics.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 304–312.Google Scholar
Coan, J. A., Schaefer, H. S., & Davidson, R. J. (2006) ‘Lending a hand: Social regulation of the neural response to threat.’ Psychological Science, 17(12), 1032–1039.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F., & Bechtel, W. (2007) ‘Top-down causation without top-down causes.’ Biology & Philosophy, 22(4), 547–563.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. C., Bacanu, S. A., Bigdeli, T. B., Moscati, A., & Kendler, K. S. (2016) ‘Evaluating the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia in a large-scale genome-wide association study.’ Schizophrenia Research, 176(2–3), 136–140.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. D. (1998). Use and abuse of the benzodiazepines. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 20(5), 481–489.Google Scholar
Goldstein, D. M., & Hall, K. (2015) ‘Mass hysteria in Le Roy, New York: How brain experts materialized truth and outscienced environmental inquiry.’ American Ethnologist, 42(4), 640–657.Google Scholar
Greenberg, A. S., & Bailey, J. M. (1994) ‘The irrelevance of the medical model of mental illness to law and ethics.’ International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 17, 153–173.Google Scholar
Guze, S. B. (1989). Biological psychiatry: is there any other kind? Psychological medicine, 19(2), 315-323Google Scholar
Harré, R., Clarke, D., & De Carlo, N. (1975) Motives and mechanisms: An introduction to the psychology of action. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huntington, G. (1872) ‘On chorea.’ The Medical and Surgical Reporter, 26(15), 317–321.Google Scholar
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., … Wang, P. (2010) ‘Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.’ The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748–751.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R., & Landis, S. C. (2013) ‘Twenty-five years of progress: The view from NIMH and NINDS.’ Neuron, 80(3), 561–567.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R. (2017) Star Neuroscientist Tom Insel Leaves the Google-Spawned Verily for … a Startup? Retrieved from https://goo.gl/JX2Qyf, March 28, 2019.Google Scholar
Jocklin, V., McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1996) ‘Personality and divorce: A genetic analysis.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 288.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1995) ‘Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology.’ American Psychologist, 50(4), 266.Google Scholar
Leshner, A. I. (1997) ‘Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters.’ Science, 278(5335), 45–47.Google Scholar
Lipowski, Z. J. (1989) ‘Psychiatry: Mindless or brainless, both or neither?’ The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 34(3), 249–254.Google Scholar
Parnas, J. (2014) ‘The RDoC program: Psychiatry without psyche?’ World Psychiatry, 13(1), 46–47.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., & Kovas, Y. (2005) ‘Generalist genes and learning disabilities.’ Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 592–617.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. (2017) ‘Star Neuroscientist Tom Insel Leaves the Google-Spawned Verily for … a Startup?.’ Wired. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/JX2Qyf, March 28, 2019.Google Scholar
Satel, S., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014) ‘Addiction and the brain-disease fallacy.’ Frontiers in Psychiatry, 4, 141.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. (1998) ‘Heritability and biological explanation.’ Psychological Review, 105(4), 782.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. (2017) ‘The hard question in psychiatric nosology.’ In Kendler, K. S. and Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry IV: Classification of psychiatric illness (pp. 27–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E., Pettersson, E., & Horn, E. E. (2014) ‘A phenotypic null hypothesis for the genetics of personality.’ Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 515–540.Google Scholar
van Haren, N. E. M., Cahn, W., Pol, H. H., & Kahn, R. S. (2008) ‘Schizophrenia as a progressive brain disease.’ European Psychiatry, 23(4), 245–254.Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M., Wray, N. R., Zhang, Q., Sklar, P., McCarthy, M. I., Brown, M. A., & Yang, J. (2017) ‘10 years of GWAS discovery: Biology, function, and translation.’ The American Journal of Human Genetics, 101(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
Walum, H., Westberg, L., Henningsson, S., Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Igl, W., … Lichtenstein, P. (2008) ‘Genetic variation in the vasopressin receptor 1a gene (AVPR1A) associates with pair-bonding behavior in humans.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(37), 14153–14156.Google Scholar
Weiss, V. (1992) ‘Major genes of general intelligence.’ Personality and Individual Differences, 13(10), 1115–1134.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007) Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

References

Bickle, J. (2019) ‘Multiple realizability.’ The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/multiple-realizability/.Google Scholar
Craver, CF and Bechtel, W. (2007) ‘Top-down causation without top-down causes.’ Biology & Philosophy 22(4): 547–63.Google Scholar
Harré, R, Clarke, D, and De Carlo, N. (2015) Motives and mechanisms: An introduction to the psychology of action. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyman, S. (2010) ‘The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 6: 155–79.Google Scholar
Insel, TR and Quirion, R. (2005) ‘Psychiatry as a clinical neuroscience discipline.’ JAMA 294(17): 2221–24.Google Scholar
Kincaid, H and Sullivan, JA, eds. (2014) Classifying psychopathology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Fernendez, R, Rotheram-Borus, MJ, Betts, VT, Greenman, L, Essock, SM, Escobar, JI, Barch, D et al. (2016) ‘Rethinking funding priorities in mental health research.’ The British Journal of Psychiatry 208(6): 507–9.Google Scholar
Pollitt, A, Cochrane, G, Kirtley, A, Krapels, J, Larivière, V, Lichten, CA, Parks, S, and Wooding, S. (2016) ‘Project ecosystem: Mapping the global mental health research funding system.’ Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1271.html.Google Scholar
Schwartz, SJ, Lilienfeld, SO, Meca, A, and Sauvigné, KC. (2016) ‘The role of neuroscience within psychology: A call for inclusiveness over exclusiveness.’ The American Psychologist 71(1): 52–70.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. (2000) ‘Multiple realizations.’ Journal of Philosophy 97: 635–54.Google Scholar
Stegenga, J. (2018) Medical nihilism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tabb, K. (2015) ‘Psychiatric progress and the assumption of diagnostic discrimination.’ Philosophy of Science 82(5): 1047–58.Google Scholar
Teachman, BA, McKay, D, Barch, DM, Prinstein, MJ, Hollon, SD, and Chambless, DL. (2019) ‘How psychosocial research can help the National Institute of Mental Health achieve its grand challenge to reduce the burden of mental illnesses and psychological disorders.’ The American Psychologist 74(4): 415–31.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×