Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:57:50.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 8

from Part III - Taxonomy, Integration, and Multiple Levels of Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2020

Kenneth S. Kendler
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Josef Parnas
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Peter Zachar
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Montgomery
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
, pp. 277 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reference

Parnas, J., & Bovet, P. (2015) ‘Psychiatry made easy: Operation(al)ism and some of its consequences.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry III: The Nature and Sources of Historical Change (pp. 190212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957) Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anstey, P. R. (2011) John Locke and natural philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrios, G. E. (1996) The history of mental symptoms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Callard, F. (2016) ‘The intimate geographies of panic disorder: Parsing anxiety through pharmacological dissection.’ Osiris, 31, 203226.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) ‘Construct validity in psychological tests.’ Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281302.Google Scholar
Dalzell, T. G. (2018) Freud’s Schreber between psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Delude, C. M. (2015) ‘Deep phenotyping: The details of the disease.’ Nature, 527 (7576), S14S15. Retrieved from www.nature.com/articles/527S14aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1996) The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2000) ‘Re-introducing the Concept of Mind.’ In Ryle, G. (Ed.), The concept of mind (pp. viixvii). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Engstrom, E. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2015) ‘Emil Kraepelin: Icon and reality.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 11901196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. (1895/1962) ‘On the grounds for detaching a particular syndrome from neurasthenia under the description of “anxiety neurosis.”’ In Strachey, J. (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 3), (1893–1899) Early psychoanalytic publications (pp. 87116). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1995) Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (2002) Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heckers, S. (2008) ‘Making progress in schizophrenia research.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 591594.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1961) ‘Introduction to problems of taxonomy.’ In Zubin, J. (Ed.), Field studies in the mental disorders (pp. 322). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Henriksen, M. G., & Parnas, J. (2017) ‘Clinical manifestations of self-disorders in schizophrenia spectrum conditions.’ Current Problems of Psychiatry, 18(3), 177183. doi:10.1515/cpp-2017-0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, S. E. (2010)’ The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155179. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091532Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., & Engstrom, E. J. (2017) ‘Kahlbaum, Hecker, and Kraepelin and the transition from psychiatric symptom complexes to empirical disease forms.’ The American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(2), 102109. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030375Google Scholar
Khalidi, M. (2013) Natural categories and human kinds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, D. F., & Fink, M. (1962) ‘Psychiatric reaction patterns to imipramine.’ The American Journal of Psychiatry, 119, 432438.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (2010) ‘Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain.’ Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 716743. doi:10.1177/1745691610388774CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A., & Keller, J. (2000) ‘Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 212215. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnas, J., Møller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., & Zahavi, D. (2005) ‘EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience.’ Psychopathology, 38(5), 236258. doi:10.1159/000088441Google Scholar
Robinson, P. N. (2012) ‘Deep phenotyping for precision medicine.’ Human Mutation, 33(5), 777780. doi:10.1002/humu.22080Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949) The concept of mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tanney, J. (2015) ‘Gilbert Ryle.’ In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Standford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ryleGoogle Scholar
Zachar, P. (2008) ‘Real kinds but no true taxonomy: An essay in psychiatric systematics.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry: Explanation, phenomenology, and nosology (pp. 327367). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Zachar, P. (2019) ‘Diagnostic nomenclatures in the mental health professions as public policy.’ Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 59(3), 438445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2007) ‘Psychiatric disorders: A conceptual taxonomy.’ The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(4), 557565. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.164.4.557Google Scholar
Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2017) ‘The philosophy of nosology.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 4971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Bovet, P., & Parnas, J. (1993) ‘Schizophrenic delusions: A phenomenological approach.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 19(3), 579597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cermolacce, M., Sass, L., & Parnas, J. (2010) ‘What is bizarre in bizarre delusions? A critical review.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36(4), 667679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014) ‘The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology.’ World Psychiatry, 13(1), 2835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insel, T. R., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2015) ‘Brain disorders? Precisely.’ Science, 348(6234), 499500.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leuret, F. (1834) Fragments Psychologiques sur la Folie. Paris: Crochard.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Poul.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, J., Revsbech, R., Sæbyt, D., & Parnas, J. (2012) ‘Assessing the diagnostic validity of a structured psychiatric interview in a first‐admission hospital sample.’ World Psychiatry, 11(3), 181185.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, J., Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2013) ‘The psychiatric interview: Validity, structure, and subjectivity.’ European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 263, 353364.Google Scholar
Parnas, J. (2004) ‘Belief and pathology of self-awareness a phenomenological contribution to the classification of delusions.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(10–11), 148161.Google Scholar
Parnas, J. (2012) ‘A sea of distress.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry II: Nosology (pp. 229233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., & Bovet, P. (2015) ‘Psychiatry made easy: Operation(al)ism and some of its consequences.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry III: The Nature and Sources of Historical Change (pp. 190212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Sass, L. A., & Zahavi, D. (2013) ‘Rediscovering psychopathology: The epistemology and phenomenology of the psychiatric object.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(2), 270277.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., & Urfer-Parnas, A. (2017) ‘The ontology and epistemology of symptoms: The case of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia.’ In Kendler, K. S. & Parnas, J. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry IV: Classification of Psychiatric Illness (pp. 201216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A. R., Nordgaard, J., & Parnas, J. (2019) ‘Schizophrenia-spectrum psychopathology in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An empirical study.’ European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01022-z. [Epub ahead of print]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. D. (1959) Course in General Linguistics. New York: The Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Zandersen, M., Henriksen, M. G., & Parnas, J. (2019) ‘A recurrent question: “What is borderline?”Journal of Personality Disorders, 33(3), 341369. doi:10.1521/pedi_2018_32_348Google Scholar
Zandersen, M., & Parnas, J. (2019a) ‘Borderline personality disorder or a disorder within the schizophrenia spectrum? A psychopathological study.’ World Psychiatry, 18(1), 109110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zandersen, M., & Parnas, J. (2019b) ‘Identity disturbance, feelings of emptiness, and the boundaries of the schizophrenia spectrum.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45(1), 106113.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×