Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:54:35.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Rethinking the Relationship between Law, Markets, and Gender Inequality in Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2009

Robert L. Nelson
Affiliation:
American Bar Foundation Chicago and Northwestern University, Illinois
William P. Bridges
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Get access

Summary

In an earlier era, the gendered division of labor was often seen as part of a natural order (Kessler-Harris 1982). Law was centrally implicated in this ideological structure. Not only did legal rules operate to constrain female labor force participation, but the opinions of judges articulated the gender ideology that made the rules reasonable and just. When the Supreme Court upheld the State of Illinois's proscription of women from law practice, it cited higher authority: “The paramount destiny and mission of woman are to fulfill the noble and benign offices of wife and mother. This is the law of the Creator.”

In the modern era, one would think, certainly both societal values about female employment and the role of the law in regulating labor markets have changed dramatically. A substantial proportion of American women work outside the home, even in years when they have young children. Now the law against employment discrimination stands to strike down the very sex stereotypes that it once invoked.

Yet what has changed? Women work, but, remarkably, they continue to “choose” jobs that pay less. According to orthodox labor economics, employing organizations are not responsible for this fact. The market sets the price of work independent of the gender of its incumbents. The highly gendered character of pay inequality in organizations is explained as the product of gender-neutral responses by employers to a gender-neutral labor market.

The market-based interpretation of gender inequality in organizations is not just one side of an academic debate.

Type
Chapter
Information
Legalizing Gender Inequality
Courts, Markets and Unequal Pay for Women in America
, pp. 309 - 364
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×