Book contents
- The Legal Framework of the OSCE
- The Legal Framework of the OSCE
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II The Quest for International Legal Personality
- 2 Political Dynamics and Institutional Reforms in the OSCE
- 3 The Role of the Organisation in Asserting Legal Personality: the Position of the OSCE Secretariat on the OSCE’s Legal Status
- 4 The Role of the Participating States in Reforming the Legal Framework of the OSCE: Past Developments, Status Quo and Future Ambitions
- 5 ‘It’s Politics, Stupid’: an International Relations Perspective on Strengthening the Legal Framework of the OSCE
- 6 Domestic Implications of the OSCE’s Legal Personality under Russian Constitutional Law
- Part III Manifestations of the Legal Position under International Law
- Part IV The Legal and Institutional Framework as a Governance Issue
- Part V Conclusions
- Index
- References
2 - Political Dynamics and Institutional Reforms in the OSCE
from Part II - The Quest for International Legal Personality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 August 2019
Book contents
- The Legal Framework of the OSCE
- The Legal Framework of the OSCE
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II The Quest for International Legal Personality
- 2 Political Dynamics and Institutional Reforms in the OSCE
- 3 The Role of the Organisation in Asserting Legal Personality: the Position of the OSCE Secretariat on the OSCE’s Legal Status
- 4 The Role of the Participating States in Reforming the Legal Framework of the OSCE: Past Developments, Status Quo and Future Ambitions
- 5 ‘It’s Politics, Stupid’: an International Relations Perspective on Strengthening the Legal Framework of the OSCE
- 6 Domestic Implications of the OSCE’s Legal Personality under Russian Constitutional Law
- Part III Manifestations of the Legal Position under International Law
- Part IV The Legal and Institutional Framework as a Governance Issue
- Part V Conclusions
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Legal Framework of the OSCE , pp. 29 - 47Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bakker, Edwin and Pietersma, Hinke, ‘The OSCE in Search of a Meaningful Reform Agenda’, Atlantisch Perspectief 29 No. 7–8 (2005), 23–9.Google Scholar
Brander, Sonya, ‘Making a Credible Case for a Legal Personality for the OSCE’, OSCE Magazine 18 (2009), 18–23.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel and Ikenberry, John, G. ‘The Unravelling of the Cold War Settlement’, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 51, No. 6 (2009–2010), 39–62.Google Scholar
Ghebali, Victor-Yves, ‘The OSCEs Istanbul Charter for European Security’, NATO Review 48 No. 1 (2000), 23–6.Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, Petri and Nünlist, Christian, ‘Trust and Realpolitik: The OSCE in 2016’, Policy Perspectives 4, No. 1 (2016).Google Scholar
Kropatcheva, Elena, ‘The Evolution of Russia’s OSCE Policy: From the Promises of the Helsinki Final Act to the Ukrainian Crisis’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 No. 1 (2015), 6–24.Google Scholar
Lehne, Stefan, The CSCE in the 1990s: Common European House or Potemkin Village? (Vienna: Braumüller, 1991).Google Scholar
Lynch, Dov, ‘The State of the OSCE’, The EU-Russia Centre Review: Russia, the OSCE and European Security, No. 12, 5–13.Google Scholar
Maresca, John, To Helsinki: The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe 1973–1975 (Durham: Duke University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Maresca, John, Helsinki Revisited: A Key U.S. Negotiator’s Memoirs on the Development of the CSCE into the OSCE (Stuttgart: Ibidem, 2016).Google Scholar
Möckli, Daniel, ‘The EC Nine, the CSCE, and the Changing Pattern of European Security’, in Wenger, Andreas, Mastny, Vojtech and Nünlist, Christian (eds.), Origins of the European Security System: The Helsinki Process Revisited, 1965–75 (London: Routledge, 2008), 145–63.Google Scholar
Neukirch, Claus, ‘The Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine: Operational Challenges and New Horizons’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburged, OSCE Yearbook 2014 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2015), 183–97.Google Scholar
Nünlist, Christian, ‘Expanding the East–West Dialog beyond the Bloc Division: The Neutrals as Negotiators and Mediators’, in Wenger, Andreas, Mastny, Vojtech and Nünlist, Christian (eds.), Origins of the European Security System: The Helsinki Process Revisited, 1965–75 (London: Routledge, 2008), 201–21.Google Scholar
Nünlist, Christian, ‘Helsinki +40 in the Historical Context’, Security and Human Rights 25 (2014), 198–209.Google Scholar
Nünlist, Christian, ‘Contested History: Rebuilding Trust in European Security’, Strategic Trends (2017), 9–32.Google Scholar
Nünlist, Christian, ‘The OSCE and the Future of European Security’, CSS Analyses in Security Policy No. 202 (2017).Google Scholar
Panel of Eminent Persons, Common Purpose: Towards a More Effective OSCE (Vienna: OSCE 2005).Google Scholar
Rey, Marie-Pierre, ‘The USSR and the Helsinki Process, 1969–75: Optimism, Doubt, or Defiance?’, in Wenger, Andreas, Mastny, Vojtech and Nünlist, Christian (eds.), Origins of the European Security System: The Helsinki Process Revisited, 1965–75 (London: Routledge, 2008), 65–81.Google Scholar
Rosin, Philip, Die Schweiz im KSZE-Prozess 1972–1983: Einfluss durch Neutralität (Munich: Oldenbourg, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonet, Loïc and Lüber, Hans Georg, ‘The OSCE and Its Legal Status: Revisiting the Myth of Sisyphus’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2016 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2017), 277–314.Google Scholar
Snyder, Sarah, Human Rights Activism and the End of the Cold War (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Thomas, Daniel, The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiilikainen, Teija (ed.), Reviving Co-operative Security in Europe through the OSCE (Vienna: OSCE, 2015).Google Scholar
US Congress, Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 106th Congress vol. 146, part 7 (Washington: GPO, 2000).Google Scholar
Zagorski, Andrei, ‘The Russian Proposal for a Treaty on European Security: From the Medvedev Initiative to the Corfu Process’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2009 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2010), 43–59.Google Scholar
Zellner, Wolfgang, ‘Russia and the OSCE: From High Hopes to Disillusionment’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18 No. 3 (2005), 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellner, Wolfgang, ‘Das OSZE-Gipfeltreffen in Astana im Jahr 2010’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2010 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2011), 23–31.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by