Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:06:35.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Oral Argument as a Bridge between the Briefs and the Court’s Opinion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Tom Goldstein
Affiliation:
Goldstein & Russell, P.C.
Scott Dodson
Affiliation:
University of California, Hastings College of Law
Get access

Summary

A Supreme Court oral argument is an odd beast. Unlike at many other courts, in which oral argument represents the one time in which overworked judges can really focus on the issue, facts, and arguments of the parties, oral argument at the Supreme Court is not particularly important to the case’s outcome. The reasons are many. The Supreme Court’s docket is small – around eighty cases heard a year – allowing the justices the luxury of being able to focus deeply on each case. Each justice has four clerks, often among the brightest legal minds of their ages, to assist. The Court tends to restrict the issues presented to those that, in the main, involve broad legal principles rather than intricate factual disputes that tend to get cumbersome in briefs.

By the time issues reach the Supreme Court, they have been through two rounds of judicial decision, helping clarify and crystallize the issue. And, at the Supreme Court, the issues get not one but two rounds of briefing (one at the cert stage and one at the merits stage), plus a plethora of amicus filings, all written by an increasingly specialized Supreme Court bar.

Finally, because the justices vote on a case within one or two days after the oral argument (for Monday and Tuesday arguments, the vote occurs on Wednesday; for Wednesday arguments, the vote occurs on Friday), the justices tend to be prepared for the vote before argument. The end result of all this is that by the time the case reaches oral argument, the justices have had the best preparation possible, and they have devoted signii cant and deep thought to the issue. Oral argument rarely changes which side wins or loses.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×