Notes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2015
Edited by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg , pp. 237 - 310Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
, Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, 1933–, 1 Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States337–42
, & , A Conversation with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 25 Colum. J. Gender & L.6, 7 (2013)Google Scholar
, Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Personal, Very Fond Tribute, 20 U. Haw. L. Rev.583, 583 (1988)Google Scholar
, Judgments in Search of Full Faith and Credit: The Last-in-Time Rule for Conflicting Judgments, 82 Harv. L. Rev. 798 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Claiming a Space in the Law School Curriculum: A Casebook on Sex-Based Discrimination, 25 Colum. J.L. & Gender54, 54–58 (2013)Google Scholar
, Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment: A Question of Time, 57 Tex. L. Rev.919, 936 (1979)Google Scholar
, A Map Out of the Personal Jurisdiction Labyrinth, 28 U.C. Davis L. Rev.531, 555 (1995)Google Scholar
, Women’s Rights through Litigation: An Examination of the American Civil Liberties Union Women’s Rights Project, 1971–1976, 8 Colum. Hum. Rights L. Rev.380 (1976)Google Scholar
& , Some Reflections on the Feminist Legal Thought of the 1970s, 1989 U. Chi. Legal F.9
, The Gay Rights State: Wisconsin’s Pioneering Legislation to Prohibit Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation, 22 Wis. Women’s L.J.91 (2007)Google Scholar
, Why Diamonds Really Are a Girl’s Best Friend, 153 Proceedings Am. Phil. Soc’y56 (Mar. 2009)Google Scholar
, Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and Constitutional Change: The Case of the De Facto ERA, 94 Calif. L. Rev.1323, 1385–86 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Equal Citizenship Stature: Justice Ginsburg’s Constitutional Vision, 43 New Eng. L. Rev.771 (2010)Google Scholar
, In Pursuit of Equality: One Woman’s Work to Change the Law, 11 Women’s Rts. L. Rep.73 (1989)Google Scholar
, Remarks for the Celebration of 75 Years of Women’s Enrollment at Columbia Law School, 102 Colum. L. Rev.1441, 1447 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Rise, Development and Future Directions of Critical Race Theory and Related Scholarship, 84 Denv. U. L. Rev.329, 336 (2006)Google Scholar
, Equality Talk: Antisubordination and Anticlassification Values in Constitutional Struggles over Brown, 117 Harv. L. Rev.1470, 1472–76 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , The American Civil Rights Tradition: Anticlassification or Antisubordination?, 58 U. Miami L. Rev.9, 10 (2003Google Scholar
, The Principle and Practice of Women’s “Full Citizenship”: A Case Study of Sex-Segregated Public Education, 101 Mich. L. Rev.755, 769–79 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Equality and Choice: Sex Equality Perspectives on Reproductive Rights in the Work of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 25 Colum. J. Gender & L.63 (2013)Google Scholar
, Sex Equality Arguments for Reproductive Rights: Their Critical Basis and Evolving Constitutional Expression, 56 Emory L.J.815 (2007)Google Scholar
, Dignity and the Politics of Protection: Abortion Restrictions under Casey/Carhart, 117 Yale L.J.1694, 1738–45, 1763–66 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Strategies of Difference: Litigating for Women’s Rights in a Man’s World, 2 L. & Inequality33, 55 (1984)Google Scholar
& , Some Reflections on the Feminist Legal Thought of the 1970s, 1989 U. Chi. Legal F.9Google Scholar
, “The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy, 105 Yale L.J.2117, 2188–95 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Anti-Stereotyping Principle in Constitutional Sex Discrimination Law, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev.1, 3–4 (2010)Google Scholar
, Race-Conscious Student Assignment Plans: Balkanization, Integration, and Individualized Consideration, 56 Duke L.J.781, 830–33, 841–43 (2006)Google Scholar
& , Legislative Constitutionalism and Section Five Power: Policentric Interpretation of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 112 Yale L.J.1943, 2042 n.309 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby”: Rehnquist’s New Approach to Pregnancy Discrimination in Hibbs, 58 Stan. L. Rev.1871, 1897–98 (2006)Google Scholar
& , Pregnancy and Sex Role Stereotyping, from Struck to Carhart, 70 Ohio St. L.J.1095 (2009)Google Scholar
, Introduction: Learning to Listen to Ruth Bader Ginsburg, N.Y. City L. Rev.213, 218–19 (2004)Google Scholar
& , Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Jurisprudence of Opportunity and Equality, 104 Colum. L. Rev.39, 47 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Equality’s Frontiers: How Congress’s Section 5 Power Can Secure Transformative Equality (As Justice Ginsburg Illustrates in Coleman), 122 Yale L.J. Online267 (2013)Google Scholar
, Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Roe v. Wade, 63 N.C. L. Rev.375 (1985)Google ScholarPubMed
, Reasoning from the Body: A Historical Perspective on Abortion Regulation and Questions of Equal Protection, 44 Stan. L. Rev.261 (1992)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Thurgood Marshall: A Misleading Comparison, 26 Rutgers L.J.887 (1995)Google Scholar
& Reva B, Struck by Stereotype: Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Pregnancy Discrimination as Sex Discrimination, 59 Duke L.J.771 (2010)Google Scholar
, Equal Citizenship Stature: Justice Ginsburg’s Constitutional Vision, 43 New Eng. L. Rev.799 (2009)Google Scholar
& , Crow and the Law: Sex Discrimination and Title VII, 34 Geo. Wash. L. Rev.232 (1965–1966)Google Scholar
& , Sense and Sensibility: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Mentoring Style as a Blend of Rigor and Compassion, 1998 U. Hawai’i L. Rev.589Google Scholar
, The Anti-Stereotyping Principle in Constitutional Sex Discrimination Law, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev.83, 97–105 (2010)Google Scholar
, Some Thoughts on the 1980’s Debate over Special versus Equal Treatment of Women, 4 L. & Inequality143, 146 (1986)Google Scholar
, Social Reform Litigation and Its Challenges: An Essay in Honor of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 32 Harv. J.L. & Gender251, 266 (2009)Google Scholar
, Geduldig Reborn: Hibbs as a Success(?) of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Sex-Discrimination Strategy, 93 Calif. L. Rev.541, 544–55 (2005)Google Scholar
& , Some Reflections on the Feminist Legal Thought of the 1970s, 1989 U. Chi. Legal F.9Google Scholar
, “You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby”: Rehnquist’s New Approach to Pregnancy Discrimination in Hibbs, 58 Stan. L. Rev.1871 (2006)Google Scholar
, Is the Work-Family Conflict Pathological or Normal under the FMLA?: The Potential of the FMLA to Cover Ordinary Work-Family Conflicts, 15 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol’y193, 208 (2004)Google Scholar
& , Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and Men into Social Roles, 46 J. Personality & Soc. Psych.735–54 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., Precarious Manhood, 95 J. Personality & Soc. Psych.1325, 1326 (2008)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al., When Equal Isn’t Really Equal: The Masculine Dilemma of Seeking Work Flexibility, 69 J. Soc. Issues303, 311 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , Penalizing Men Who Request a Family Leave: Is Flexibility Stigma a Femininity Stigma?, 69 J. Soc. Issues322, 336 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , Workplace Mistreatment of Middle Class Workers Based on Sex, Parenthood, and Caregiving, 69 J. Soc. Issues341, 354 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Sex Discrimination and the IRS: Public Policy and the Charitable Deduction, 10 Tax Notes27 (Jan. 14, 1980)Google Scholar
, The Supreme Court, 1995 Term – Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided, 110 Harv. L. Rev.4, 75 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Anti-Stereotyping Principle in Constitutional Sex Discrimination Law, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev.83, 143–46 (2010)Google Scholar
, You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby: Rehnquist’s New Approach to Pregnancy Discrimination in Hibbs, 58 Stan. L. Rev.1871, 1873 (2006)Google Scholar
, Justice Ginsburg and the Judicial Role in Expanding “We the People”: The Disability Rights Cases, 104 Colum. L. Rev.49, 56 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , Some Reflections on the Feminist Legal Thought of the 1970s, 1989 U. Chi. Legal F.9Google Scholar
, The Supreme Court, 2012 Term – Foreword: Equality Divided, 127 Harv. L. Rev.1, 14 (2013)Google Scholar
, Justice Ginsburg’s Gradualism in Criminal Procedure, 70 Ohio St. L.J.867, 870 (2009)Google Scholar
, “Equal Citizenship Stature”: Justice Ginsburg’s Constitutional Vision, 43 New. Eng. L. Rev.799, 825 (2009)Google Scholar
, Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 70 Ohio St. L.J.1085, 1086 (2009)Google Scholar
, Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Roe v. Wade, 63 N.C. L. Rev.375, 376 (1985)Google ScholarPubMed
, et al. Circuit Effects: How the Norm of Federal Judicial Experience Biases the U.S. Supreme Court, 157 U. Pa. L. Rev.833, 853–64 (2009)Google Scholar
, Justice Ginsburg’s First Decade: Some Thoughts about Her Contributions in the Fields of Procedure and Jurisdiction, 104 Colum. L. Rev.21, 21–22 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Equal Protection Clause: 1970–80, 25 Colum. J. Gender & L.41, 41 (2013)Google Scholar
, Raising the Bar: Maples v. Thomas and the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel, 127 Harv. L. Rev.468 (2013)Google Scholar
, The Lone Miscreant, The Self-Training Prosecutor, and Other Fictions: A Comment on Connick v. Thompson, 80 Fordham L. Rev.715, 721 (2011)Google Scholar
, Dissenting in General: Herring v. United States in Particular, 127 Harv. L. Rev.433, 433 (2013)Google Scholar
, Legally Blind: Hyperadversarialism, Brady Violations, and the Prosecutorial Organizational Culture, 87 St. John’s L. Rev.1 (2013)Google Scholar
, Defense Counsel, Trial Judges, and Evidence Production Protocols, 45 Tex. Tech. L. Rev.133 (2012)Google Scholar
, Federal Criminal Discovery Reform: A Legislative Approach, 64 Mercer L. Rev.639 (2013)Google Scholar
, Democracy and Criminal Discovery Reform After Connick and Garcetti, 77 Brook. L. Rev.1329 (2012)Google Scholar
, New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure in Practice after Connick v. Thompson, 25Geo. J. Legal Ethics913 (2012)Google Scholar
, The Right’s Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Women-Protective Antiabortion Argument, 57 Duke L.J.1641 (2008)Google Scholar
, Lee v. Kemna: Federal Habeas Corpus and State Procedure, 127 Harv. L. Rev.445, 448–49 (2013)Google Scholar
, Remarks of Ruth Bader Ginsburg at CUNY School of Law, 7 N.Y. City L. Rev.221, 238 (2004)Google Scholar
, Sex Equality Arguments for Reproductive Rights: Their Critical Basis and Evolving Constitutional Expression, 56 Emory L.J.815, 823 (2007)Google Scholar
& , Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Jurisprudence of Opportunity and Equality, 104 Colum. L. Rev.39, 45 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Equal Protection Clause, 25 Colum. J. Gender & L.41, 41 (2013)Google Scholar
, Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment: A Question of Time, 57 Tex. L. Rev.919, 919 (1979)Google Scholar
, & , An Empirical Examination of the Confirmation Hearings of the Justices of the Rehnquist Court, 24 Const. Commentary127, 140 tbl.B (2007)Google Scholar
, Justice Ginsburg’s Gradualism in Criminal Procedure, 70 Ohio St. L.J.865, 879 (2009)Google Scholar
& , The Politics of Criminal Justice: How the New Rights Shaped the Rehnquist Court’s Criminal Justice Jurisprudence, 94 Geo. L.J.1385 (2005)Google Scholar
, Northward Migration and the Rise of Racial Disparity in American Incarceration, 1880–1950, 118 Am. J. Soc.281, 282–83 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Past, Present, and Future of Mass Incarceration in the United States, 10 Criminology & Pub. Pol.483, 489 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy, 277 Science918 (1997)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
& , The Social Sources of Americans’ Punitiveness: A Test of Three Competing Models, 48 Criminology99, 119 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Backlash and Legitimation: Macro Political Responses to Supreme Court Decisions, 58 Am. Pol. Sci. J.110, 120 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Lurking in the Shadows of Judicial Process: Special Masters in the Supreme Court’s Original Jurisdiction Cases, 86 Minn. L. Rev.625 (2002)Google Scholar
, Federal Interference with State Prosecutions: The Need for Prospective Relief, 1977 Sup. Ct. Rev.193Google Scholar
, The Uneasy Relationship between Criminal Procedure and Criminal Justice, 107 Yale L.J.1, 6 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Supreme Court Review of State-Court Determinations of State Law in Constitutional Cases, 103 Colum. L. Rev.1919 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Criminal Justice, Local Democracy, and Constitutional Rights, 111 Mich. L. Rev.1045 (2013)Google Scholar
, Lenity, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes, 71 Va. L. Rev.189, 198–200 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, End of the Dialogue? Political Polarization, the Supreme Court, and Congress, 86 S. Cal. L. Rev.205 (2013)Google Scholar
, The Bill of Rights as a Code of Criminal Procedure, 53 Calif. L. Rev.929, 951–53 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Fourth Amendment Remedies and Development of the Law: A Comment on Camreta v. Greene and Davis v. United States, 2011 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev.237, 254 (2011)Google Scholar
, Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity after Booker: A First Look, 63 Stan. L. Rev.1 (2010)Google Scholar
, Habeas and the Roberts Court, 81 U. Chi. L. Rev. – (forthcoming)
, Can Section 1983 Help Prevent the Execution of Mentally Retarded Prisoners, 121 Yale L.J.1571 (2012)Google Scholar
, The Eleventh Amendment and the Reading of Precise Constitutional Texts, 113 Yale L.J.1663 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Party, Policy, or Duty, Why Does the Supreme Court Invalidate Federal Statutes, 101 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev.321, 323 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Mere Negligence or Abandonment? Evaluating Claims of Attorney Misconduct after Maples v. Thomas, 122 Yale L.J.1328, 1357–58 (2013)Google Scholar
, The Arc of the Pendulum: Judges, Prosecutors, and the Exercise of Discretion, 117 Yale L.J.1420, 1425 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Sentencing Guidelines at the Crossroads of Politics and Experience, 160 U. Pa. L. Rev.1599, 1624 (2012)Google Scholar
, Collaring the Crime, not the Criminal: Reconsidering the Concept of White Collar Crime, 55 Am. Soc. Rev.346 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Virtues and Vices of the Exclusionary Rule, 20 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y443, 443–44 (1997)Google Scholar
, Making Government Pay: Markets, Politics, and the Allocation of Constitutional Costs, 67 U. Chi. L. Rev.345, 370–71 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , Litigation Reform: An Institutional Approach, 162 U. Pa. L. Rev. (forthcoming)
, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sensible Pragmatism in Federal Jurisdictional Policy, 70 Ohio St. L.J.839, 840 (2009)Google Scholar
, Justice Ginsburg’s First Decade: Some Thoughts about her Contributions in the Fields of Procedure and Jurisdiction, 104 Colum. L. Rev.21, 21 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Sad Time: Thoughts on Jurisdictionality, the Legal Imagination, and Bowles v. Russell, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy164 (2008)Google Scholar
, The Jurisdictional Time Limit for an Appeal: The Worst Kind of Deadline – Except for All Others, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy151 (2008)Google Scholar
, The Emergence of Jurisdictional Resequencing in the Federal Courts, 87 Cornell L. Rev.1, 9 (2001)Google Scholar
, Sequencing the Issues for Judicial Decisionmaking: Limitations from Jurisdictional Primacy and Intrasuit Preclusion, 63 Fla. L. Rev.301, 304–06, 328–29 (2011)Google Scholar
& , Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Jurisprudence of Process and Procedure, 20 U. Haw. L. Rev.647, 650 (1998)Google Scholar
, Modern and Traditional Administration of Justice in New Guinea, 19 J. Legal Pluralism & Unofficial L.93 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics, 50 Stan. L. Rev.1471 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, International Law and Sociolegal Scholarship: Toward a Spatial Global Legal Pluralism, 41 Studies in L., Politics & Soc’y149 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Creeping Monism: The Judicial Trend toward Interpretive Incorporation of Human Rights Treaties, 107 Colum. L. Rev.628 (2007)Google Scholar
, The Uses of Jurisdictional Redundancy: Interest, Ideology, and Innovation, 22 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.639 (1981)Google Scholar
, Law’s Migration: American Exceptionalism, Silent Dialogues, and Federalism’s Multiple Ports of Entry, 115 Yale L.J.1564 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative, 97 Harv. L. Rev.4, 53 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Living Their Legal Commitments: Paideic Communities, Courts, and Robert Cover (An Essay on Racial Segregation at Bob Jones University, Patrilineal Membership Rules, Veiling, and Jurisgenerative Practices), 17 Yale J.L. & Human.17, 25 (2005)Google Scholar
, Judgments in Search of Full Faith and Credit: The Last-in-Time Rule for Conflicting Judgments, 82 Harv. L. Rev.798 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , The Clinton Clones: Ginsburg, Breyer, and the Clinton Legacy, 84 Judicature262, 265 (2001)Google Scholar
, In a Dissenting Voice: Justice Ginsburg’s Federalism, 43 New Eng. L. Rev.771, 774 (2009)Google Scholar
, “A Decent Respect to the Opinions of [Human]kind”: The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjudication, 26 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev.927, 927 (2011)Google Scholar
, Finding the Way to Indian Country: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Decisions in Indian Law Cases, 70 Ohio St. L.J.1003, 1008–09 (2009)Google Scholar
et al., Plunging into Endless Difficulties: Medicaid and Coercion in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 93 B.U. L. Rev.1 (2013)Google Scholar
, Gonzales v. Raich: Federalism as a Casualty of the War on Drugs, 15 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol’y507, 508 (2006)Google Scholar
, So It’s a Tax, Now What? Some of the Problems Remaining after NFIB v. Sebelius, 17 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol.203, 212–13 (2013)Google Scholar
& , Preemption in the Rehnquist Court: A Preliminary Empirical Assessment, 14 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev.43, 84–88 (2006)Google Scholar
, Three Faces of Federalism: Finding A Formula for the Future, 47 Vand. L. Rev.1563, 1571 (1994)Google Scholar
, Remarks on Women’s Progress at the Bar and on the Bench, 89 Cornell L. Rev.801, 805 (2004)Google Scholar
& , Women in the Federal Judiciary: Three Way Pavers and the Exhilarating Change President Carter Wrought, 64 Fordham L. Rev.281, 281 (1995)Google Scholar
, Courting the People: Demosprudence and the Law/Politics Divide, 89 B.U. L. Rev.539 (2009)Google Scholar
, The Supreme Court, 2007 Term – Foreword: Demosprudence through Dissent, 122 Harv. L. Rev.4 (2008)Google Scholar
, & , Hear Me Roar: What Provokes Supreme Court Justices to Dissent from the Bench?, 92 Minn. L. Rev.1560, 1568–73 (2009)Google Scholar
, The Supreme Court, 1981 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative, 97 Harv. L. Rev.4 (1983)Google Scholar
, Interpretations of the Equal Protection Clause, 9 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y41, 45 (1986)Google Scholar