Book contents
- Law and Economics of Possession
- Law and Economics of Possession
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction
- I Foundation
- II Specific issues
- 9 Possession and licenses: the FCC, weak spectrum rights, and the LightSquared debacle
- 10 Jurisdiction, choice of law, and property
- 11 Small property, adverse possession, and optional law
- 12 Title in the shadow of possession
- Index
- References
9 - Possession and licenses: the FCC, weak spectrum rights, and the LightSquared debacle
from II - Specific issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Edited by
Book contents
- Law and Economics of Possession
- Law and Economics of Possession
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction
- I Foundation
- II Specific issues
- 9 Possession and licenses: the FCC, weak spectrum rights, and the LightSquared debacle
- 10 Jurisdiction, choice of law, and property
- 11 Small property, adverse possession, and optional law
- 12 Title in the shadow of possession
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Law and Economics of Possession , pp. 237 - 265Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Baxter, William and Altree, Lillian 1972. “Legal Aspects of Airport Noise,” Journal of Law and Economics 15:1–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1959. “The Federal Communications Commissions,” Journal of Law and Economics 2:1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics 3:1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, J. Pierre. 2013. “Optimizing receiver performance using harm claim thresholds, Telecommunications Policy,” Telecommunications Policy http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.04.008i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1979a, Nuisance Law: Corrective Justice and Its Utilitarian Constraints, Journal of Legal Studies 8:49–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1979b. “Possession as the Root of Title,” Georgia Law Review 13:1221–44.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 2009. “The Many Faces of Fault in Contract Law: Or How to Do Economics Right, without Really Trying,” Michigan Law Review 107:1461–77.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 2010. “The Disintegration of Intellectual Property? A Classical Liberal Response to Premature Obituary,” Stanford Law Review 62:455–521.Google Scholar
Free State Foundation Scholars Respond to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce’s First White Paper, “Modernizing the Communications Act” Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, (2014), available at http://freestatefoundation.org/images/Response_to_Questions_in_the_First_White_Paper_013114.pdf.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Victor P., Merrill, Thomas W. and Unumb, Daniel 1987. “Bargaining in the Shadow of Eminent Domain; Valuing and Apportioning Condemnation Awards,” U.C.L.A. Law Review 34:1083–1138.Google Scholar
Hazlett, Thomas W. 1990. “The Rationality of U.S. Regulation of the Broadcast Spectrum,” Journal of Law and Economics 33:133–76.Google Scholar
Hazlett, Thomas W., and Skorup, Brent 2013. “Tragedy of the Regulatory Commons: LightSquared and the Missing Spectrum Rights,” working paper forthcoming in Duke Law and Technology Review.Google Scholar
Landis, James M. 1938. The Administrative Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maitland, Frederic W. 1936. The Forms of Action At Common Law Chaytor, A.H. and Whittaker, W.J. (eds.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E. 2000. “Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle,” Yale Law Journal 110:1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Frederick, and Maitland, Frederic W. 1895. History of English Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Frederick, and Wright, Robert S. 1888. Possession in the Common Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Patrick S. 2012. “The Itu and the Internet’s Titanic Moment,” Stanford Technology Law Review 8:7–10.Google Scholar