Book contents
- Language Socialization in Classrooms
- Language Socialization in Classrooms
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Transcription Conventions
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Socializing Values, Dispositions, and Stances
- Part II Socializing Identities
- 5 Learning to Be a Poet
- 6 Teaching Words, Socializing Affect, and Social Identities
- 7 Making the Familiar Change
- 8 Negotiating Epistemic Authority and Co-Constructing Difference
- Part III Language Socialization and Ideology
- Part IV Conclusion
- Index
- References
7 - Making the Familiar Change
Language Socialization via Contrapuntal Interaction in a US High School Language Arts Class
from Part II - Socializing Identities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 February 2020
Book contents
- Language Socialization in Classrooms
- Language Socialization in Classrooms
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Transcription Conventions
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Socializing Values, Dispositions, and Stances
- Part II Socializing Identities
- 5 Learning to Be a Poet
- 6 Teaching Words, Socializing Affect, and Social Identities
- 7 Making the Familiar Change
- 8 Negotiating Epistemic Authority and Co-Constructing Difference
- Part III Language Socialization and Ideology
- Part IV Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter explores the contrapuntal nature of school and peer socialization among honors eleventh graders and their teacher in a US high school classroom as they negotiate expertise and identities over a lesson, across changing speech events and participation frameworks. The analysis shows how certain epistemic stance markers ratify or challenge peers’ knowledge and display flexible and relative understandings of expertise across shifting participation frameworks, and how students’ engagement with course material involves simultaneous identity displays to peers. Paradoxically, these identity displays, while done in ways that may index counterpositions to the teacher, also serve as points of classroom engagement. The analysis deconstructs the distinction between “unofficial” peer socialization and “official” academic learning, illuminating how an experienced teacher and gifted teens build classroom community and learning through contrapuntal discourse that accomplishes both goals. The findings suggest that teachers and administrators concerned with classroom management might do well to consider building this contrapuntal rhythm, rather than muting students’ contribution to it.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language Socialization in ClassroomsCulture, Interaction, and Language Development, pp. 132 - 157Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Blackledge, A. and Creese, A. (2010). Multilingualism: A Critical Perspective. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Burdelski, M. and Cook, H. M. (2012). Formulaic language in language socialization. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 173–188.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning, 2nd Ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Cook, H. M. (1999). Language socialization in Japanese elementary schools: attentive listening and reaction turns. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1443–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: an ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 289–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F. (1996). Going for the zone: the social and cognitive ecology of teacher–student interaction in classroom conversations. In Hicks, D. (ed.), Discourse, Learning, and Schooling (pp. 29–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, D. A. (2010). Speaking correctly: error correction as a language socialization practice in a Ukrainian classroom. Applied Linguistics, 31, 346–367.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA; University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B., and Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3): 445–471.Google Scholar
He, A. (2003). Novices and their speech roles in Chinese heritage language classes. In Bailey, R. and Schecter, S. R. (eds.), Language Socialization in Bilingual and Multilingual Societies (pp. 128–146). Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, K. M. (2009). Breaking in and spinning out: repetition and de-calibration in Thai children’s play genres. Language in Society, 38(3), 339–363.Google Scholar
Kulick, D. and Schieffelin, B. B. (2004). Language socialization. In Duranti, A. (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 349–368). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. (1979). ‘What time is it, Denise?”: asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18(4), 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (1990). Indexicality and socialization. In Stigler, J. W., Schweder, R. A., and Herdt, G. (eds.), Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development (pp. 287–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Taylor, C. (1996). The “father knows best” dynamic in family dinner narratives. In Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M. (eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self (pp. 97–120). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (2005). Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. Northampton, MA: Longman.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (2006). Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rymes, B. R. (2008). The relationship between mass media and classroom discourse. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 23(1), 65–88.Google Scholar
Rymes, B. R. (2010). Communicative repertoires and English language learners. In Shatz, M. and Wilkinson, L. C. (eds.), The Education of English Language Learners: Research to Practice (1st ed.) (pp. 177–197). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rymes, B. R. (2014). Communicating beyond Language: Everyday Encounters with Diversity. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rymes, B. R. (2016). Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Tool for Critical reflection, Revised 2nd Ed. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rymes, B., and Leone, A. R. (2014). Citizen sociolinguistics: a new media methodology for understanding language and social life. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 29(2), 25–43.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (1990). The Give and Take of Everyday Life: Language, Socialization of Kaluli Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B., and Ochs, E. (1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tommasini, A. (2010). Counterpoint. www.nytimes.com/video/arts/1247468479041/counterpoint.html [Accessed June 23, 2017].Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by