Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:38:24.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2024

Alastair Pennycook
Alastair Pennycook
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Language Assemblages , pp. 163 - 191
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, B. (2015). Deleuze and Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, A. (2007a). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agha, A. (2007b). The object called ‘language’ and the subject of linguistics. Journal of English Linguistics, 35(3), 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahner, H. (1963). Söhne des Ikarus. Berlin: Verlag Neues Leben.Google Scholar
Albury, N. J. (2016). Defining Māori language revitalisation: A project in folk linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20, 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albury, N. J. (2017). How folk linguistic methods can support critical sociolinguistics. Lingua, 199, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alim, H. S. (2016). Introducing raciolinguistics: Racing language and languaging race in hyperracial times. In Alim, H. Samy, Rickford, J. and Ball, A. (Eds.), Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race (pp. 1–30). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Armitage, J. (2022). Desert participants guide the research in Central Australia. In Heugh, K., Stroud, C., Taylor-Leech, K. and De Costa, P. (Eds.), A sociolinguistics of the south (pp. 215–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. and Mackenzie, I. E. (2013). Standardization, ideology and linguistics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronin, L. and Ó Laoire, M. (2013). The material culture of multilingualism: Moving beyond the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(3), 225–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P. (1995). The pragmatics of code-switching: A sequential approach. In Milroy, L. and Muysken, P. (Eds.), One speaker, two languages (pp. 115–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auer, P. (2022). ‘Translanguaging’ or ‘doing languages’? Multilingual practices and the notion of ‘codes’. In MacSwan, J. (Ed.), Multilingual perspectives on translanguaging (pp. 131–59). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bade, D. (2021). Edward said, Roy asked, and the peasant responded: Reflections on peasants, popular culture, and intellectuals. In Makoni, S., Verity, D. and Kaiper-Marquez, A. (Eds.), Integrational linguistics and philosophy of language in the Global South (pp. 18–29). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J. (1972). No name on the street. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L. and Trudgill, P. (1998a). Introduction. In Bauer, L. and Trudgill, P. (Eds.), Language myths (pp. xv–xviii). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. and Trudgill, P. (Eds.) (1998b). Language myths. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Baugh, J. (2018). Linguistics in pursuit of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawaka Country including Burarrwanga, L., Ganambarr, R., Ganambarr-Stubbs, M., et al. (2022). Songspirals bring country into existence: Singing more-than-human and relational creativity. Qualitative Inquiry, 28(5), 435–47.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (2014). The guidebook to sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. and Khan, G. (2009). Agency, nature and emergent properties: An interview with Jane Bennett. Contemporary Political Theory, 8, 90–105.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (2nd edition). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Berson, J. (2015). Computable bodies: Instrumented life and the human somatic niche. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bessire, L. and Bond, D. (2014). Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist, 41, 440–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessone, M. (2022). Fanon’s critical humanism: Understanding humanity through its ‘misfires’. European Journal of Philosophy, 30(4), 1583–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. and Bolonyai, A. (2022). Codeswitching and its terminological Other – translanguaging. In MacSwan, J. (Ed.), Multilingual perspectives on translanguaging (pp. 154–80). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1995). Language and human behaviour. Seattle, WA: Washington University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, S. (2020). Decolonising speech and language technology. In Scott, D., Bel, N. and Zong, C. Q. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 3504–19). Barcelona: International Committee on Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2020.coling-main.313/.Google Scholar
Blackledge, A. and Creese, A. (2010). Multilingualism: A critical perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Blackledge, A. and Creese, A. (2014). Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy. In Blackledge, A. and Creese, A. (Eds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy. (Educational Linguistics series) (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blenkinsop, S. and Fettes, M. (2020). Land, language and listening: The transformations that can flow from acknowledging Indigenous Land. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(4), 1033–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2022). Innovations and challenges in identity research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2006). Language ideology. In Brown, K. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (Volume 6, pp. 510–22). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2015). Meaning as a nonlinear effect: The birth of cool. AILA Review, 28, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2017). Chronotopes, scales and complexity in the study of language in society. In Arnaut, K., Sif Karrebaek, M., Spotti, M. and Blommaert, J. (Eds.), Engaging superdiversity: Recombining spaces, times and language practices (pp. 47–62). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Backus, A. (2013). Super diverse repertoires and the individual. In de Saint-Georges, I. and Weber, J.-J. (Eds.), Multilingualism and multimodality: Current challenges for educational studies (pp. 11–32). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodkin-Andrews, G. and Carlson, B. (2016). The legacy of racism and Indigenous Australian identity within education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19(4), 784–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Branson, J. and Miller, D. (2007). Beyond ‘language’: Linguistic imperialism, sign languages and linguistic anthropology. In Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Disinvention and reconstituting languages (pp. 90–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Broadhurst, K. (2020). The death and subsequent revival of the Cornish language. The Open Review, 6, 20–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C. (1995). Teacher professionalism and research. In: Cook, G. and Seidlhofer, B. (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics, (pp. 27–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2008). All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 401–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2016). Embodied sociolinguistics. In Coupland, N. (Ed), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp. 173–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burkette, A. (2021). Connections and interdisciplinarity: Linguistic Atlas Project data from an assemblage perspective. In Burkette, A. and Warhol, T. (Eds.), Crossing borders, making connections: Interdisciplinarity in linguistics (pp. 99–110). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvet, L. J. (2006). Towards an ecology of world languages (Trans. A. Brown – Pour une écologie des langues du monde). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene: The politics of language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2018). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2021). Materialising semiotic repertoires: Challenges in the interactional analysis of multilingual communication. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(2), 206–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1877293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canut, C. (2021). Agencements et indexicalités: Signifier la subjectivation politique. Langage et société, 172, 95–123.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, J. R. and Shankar, S. (2021). Language and materiality in global capitalism. In Burkette, A. and Warhol, T. (Eds.), Crossing borders, making connections: Interdisciplinarity in linguistics (pp. 169–90). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, D. and Reid, J. (2020). Becoming Indigenous: The ‘speculative turn’ in anthropology and the (re)colonisation of indigeneity. Postcolonial Studies, 23(4), 485–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chat (2023). https://chat.openai.com/.Google Scholar
Chilisa, B. (2011). Indigenous research methodologies. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Copeland, J. (Ed.) (2004). The essential Turing: Seminal writings in computing, logic, philosophy, artificial intelligence, and artificial life plus the secrets of enigma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cornips, L. (2022). The animal turn in postcolonial linguistics: The interspecies greeting of the dairy cow. Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics, 6, 209–31.Google Scholar
Cornips, L. (In press). Getting to know the dairy cow: An inclusive and self-reflexive sociolinguistics in multispecies emotional encounters. In Cutler, C., Røyneland, U. and Vrzić, Z. (Eds.), Language activism: The role of scholars in linguistic reform and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, J., de Korne, H. and Lane, P. (2018). Standardising minority languages: Reinventing peripheral languages in the 21st century. In Lane, P., Costa, J. and De Korne, H. (Eds.), Standardizing minority languages: Competing ideologies of authority and authenticity in the global periphery (pp. 1–23). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Course, M. (2018). Words beyond meaning in Mapuche language ideology. Language & Communication, 63, 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couzens, V. and Eira, C. (2014). Meeting point: Parameters for the study of revival languages. In Austin, P. and Sallabank, J. (Eds.), Endangered languages: Beliefs and ideologies in language documentation and revitalisation (pp. 313–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowley, S. (2012). Distributed language. In Cowley, S. (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 1–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cowley, S. (2019). The return of languaging: Toward a new ecolinguistics. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 15(4), 483–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T. (1996). Language in history: Theories and texts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (2021). Translanguaging – a critical analysis of theoretical claims. In Juvonen, P. and Källkvist, M. (Eds.), Pedagogical translanguaging: Theoretical, methodological and empirical perspectives (pp. 7–36). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, C. (2020). Beliefs about ‘good English’ in schools. In Hall, C. J. and Wicaksono, R. (Eds.),Ontologies of English. Reconceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 142–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cushing, I. (2022a). Standards, stigma, surveillance: Raciolinguistic ideologies and England’s schools. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, I. (2022b). Word rich or word poor? Deficit discourses, raciolinguistic ideologies and the resurgence of the ‘word gap’ in England’s education policy. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2102014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, I. and Snell, J. (2023). The (white) ears of Ofsted: A raciolinguistic perspective on the listening practices of the schools inspectorate. Language in Society, 52, 363–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, C. (In press). Labeling ethnolects: Challenges and potentials. In Cutler, C., Røyneland, U. and Vrzic, Z. (Eds.), Language activism: The role of scholars in linguistic reform and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P. (1997). Foreword. In Khubchandani, L., Revisioning boundaries: A plurilingual ethos (pp. 11–29). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (1999). An introduction to applied linguistics: From theory to practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
De Freitas, E. and Curinga, M. X. (2015). New materialist approaches to the study of language and identity: Assembling the posthuman subject. Curriculum Inquiry, 45, 249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Cedana, M. and Blaser, M. (2018). Pluriverse: Proposals for a world of many worlds. In de la Cedana, M. and Blaser, M. (Eds.), A world of many worlds (pp. 1–22). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
de Souza, L. M. (2009). The ecology of writing among the Kashinawá: Indigenous multimodality in Brazil. In Canagarajah, A. S. (Ed.), Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice (pp. 73–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
de Souza, L. M. (2017). Epistemic diversity, lazy reason, and ethical translation in postcolonial contexts. The case of Indigenous educational policy in Brazil. In Kerfoot, C. and Hyltenstam, K. (Eds.), Entangled discourses: South–North orders of visibility (pp. 189–208). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (2005). Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole exceptionalism. Language in Society, 34(4), 533–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (2019). Foreword. In Macedo, D. (Ed.), Decolonizing foreign language education: The misteaching of English and other colonial languages (pp. ix–xxxii). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (Trans. B. Massumi). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deloria, V. and Wildcat, D. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Resources.Google Scholar
Demuro, E. and Gurney, L. (2021). Languages/languaging as world-making: The ontological bases of language. Language Sciences, 83, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture. (Trans. J. Lloyd). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deumert, A. and Makoni, S. (Eds.) (2023) From Southern Theory to decolonizing sociolinguistics: Voices, questions and alternatives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deumert, A., Storch, A. and Shepherd, A. (Eds.) (2020). Colonial and decolonial linguistics: Knowledges and epistemes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutscher, G. (2011). Through the language glass: Why the world looks different in other languages. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar
Diagne, S. B. (2021). Le fagot de ma mémoire. Paris: Philippe Rey.Google Scholar
Dias, J. (2019). Reshuffling conceptual cards: What counts as language in Lowland Indigenous South America. In Guilherme, M. and Menezes de Souza, L. M. (Eds.), Glocal languages and critical language awareness: The South answers back (pp. 90–103). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Disbray, S., Plummer, R. and Martin, B. (2020). Languages ideologies and practice from the land and the classroom. Modern Language Review, 104, 519–25.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1997). The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (2016). Are some languages better than others? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchêne, A. and Heller, M. (Eds.) (2007). Discourses of endangerment: Ideology and interest in the defence of languages (pp. 268–85). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Eades, D. (2010). Sociolinguistics and the legal process. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. (2018). Meaning and linguistic variation: The third wave in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. (2012). Multilingualism: Understanding linguistic diversity. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2011). The emergence of language as a complex adaptive system. In Simpson, J. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 654–67). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. (2017). Distribution of agency. In Enfield, N. and Kockelman, P. (Eds.), Distributed agency (pp. 9–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. and Kockelman, P. (2017). Editors’ preface. In Enfield, N. and Kockelman, P. (Eds.), Distributed agency (pp. xi–xvi). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. and Sidnell, J. (2017). The concept of action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennis, G. (2020). Linguistic natures: Method, media, and language reclamation in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 30(3), 304–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, A. (2016). Thinking-feeling with the Earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the South. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 11(1), 11–32.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Estival, D., Farris, C. and Molesworth, B. (2016). Aviation English: A lingua franca for pilots and air traffic controllers. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. (1998). Aborigines speak a primitive language. In Bauer, L. and Trudgill, P. (Eds.), Language myths (pp. 159–68). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Evans, N. (2010). Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Evans, N. and Levinson, S. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, V. (2014). The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the Other: How anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanon, F. (1952). Peau noire, masques blancs. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1961). Les damnés de la terre. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Faraclas, N. (2020). On colonization and ‘awesome materiality’: A commentary. In Deumert, A., Storch, A. and Shepherd, N. (Eds.), Colonial and decolonial linguistics: Knowledge and epistemes (pp. 77–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, E. H. D. and Martinez, J. (2019). The locus of enunciation as a way to confront epistemological racism and decolonize scholarly knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 42(2), 355–59.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S. and Netz, H. (2023). Challenging folk-linguistics: Grammatical and spelling variation in students’ writing in Hebrew on WhatsApp and in essays. Applied Linguistics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnegan, R. (2015). Where is language? An anthropologist’s questions on language, literature and performance. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance in threatened languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, N. and Rosa, J. (2022). Undoing competence: Coloniality, homogeneity, and the overrepresentation of Whiteness in applied linguistics. Language Learning, 1–28.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In Rabinow, P. (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 76–100). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1996). On critical linguistics. In Caldas-Coulthard, C. and Coulthard, M. (Eds.), Text and practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 3–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1901). Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens. Berlin: Verlag von S. Karger.Google Scholar
Fuller, S. (2011). Humanity 2.0: What it means to be human past, present and future. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. (2018). Visions and revisions of minority languages: Standardization and its dilemmas. In Lane, P., Costa, J., and De Korne, H. (Eds.), Standardizing minority languages: Competing ideologies of authority and authenticity in the global periphery (pp. 222–42). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
García, O. (2011). Educating New York’s bilingual children: Constructing a future from the past. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14, 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, O. and Wei, Li (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualissm and education. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, O., Flores, N., Seltzer, K. et al. (2021). Rejecting abyssal thinking in the language and education of racialized bilinguals: A manifesto. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 18(3), 203–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2021.1935957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garroutte, E. M. (2003). Real Indians: Identity and the survival of Native America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay’wu Group of Women, Burarrwanga, L., Ganambarr, R. et al. (2019). Songspirals: Sharing women’s wisdom of Country through songlines. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Giglioli, P. P. (1972). Introduction. In Giglioli, P. P. (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 7–17). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2020). Metazoa: Animal minds and the birth of consciousness. London: William Collins.Google Scholar
Goico, S. (2021). Repeated assemblages in the interactions of deaf youth in Peru. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(2), 267–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1898617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, A. (2013). Anthropology and the politics of Indigeneity. Anthropological Forum, 23(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwyn, A. (2020). The origins and adaptations of English as a school subject. In Hall, C. J. and Wicaksono, R. (Eds.), Ontologies of English: Reconceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 101–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, L. (2006). Disciplinary decadence: Living thought in trying times. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, L. R. (2021). Freedom, justice, and decolonization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grace, G. W. (1981). Indirect inheritance and the aberrant Melanesian languages. In Hollyman, J. and Pawley, A. (Eds.), Studies in Pacific languages and cultures in honour of Bruce Biggs (pp. 255–68). Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Grace, G. (1987). The linguistic construction of reality. Beckenham: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. (2015). Radical alterity is just another way of saying ‘reality’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramling, D. (2016). The invention of monolingualism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gramling, D. (2021). The invention of multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. (2014). Drawn from the ground: Sound, sign and inscription in Central Australian sand stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. (Ed)., Universals of language (pp. 73–113). London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grenoble, L. (In press). Activism and endangered language work, with an Arctic focus. In Cutler, C., Røyneland, U. and Vrzic, Z. (Eds.), Language activism: The role of scholars in linguistic reform and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guba, E. and Lincoln, Y. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1964). Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (Eds.), The ethnography of communication. American Anthropologist, 66(2), 137–53.Google Scholar
Gurney, L. and Demuro, E. (2019). Tracing new ground, from language to languaging, and from languaging to assemblages: Rethinking languaging through the multilingual and ontological turns. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(3), 305–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1689982.Google Scholar
Guzman, A. and Lewis, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1), 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, C. (2020). An ontological framework for English. In Hall, C. J. and Wicaksono, R. (Eds.),Ontologies of English: Reconceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 13–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. and Wicaksono, R. (2020). Approaching ontologies of English. In Hall, C. J. and Wicaksono, R. (Eds.), Ontologies of English: Reconceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 3–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. (2019). Literacy and revitalizing endangered languages. In Greymorning, N. (Ed.), Being Indigenous: Perspectives on activism, culture, language and identity (pp. 212–27). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hamacher, D. (with Elders and knowledge holders) (2022). The first astronomers: How Indigenous Elders read the stars. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2017). Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harland, R. (1987). Superstructuralism: The philosophy of structuralism and post-structuralism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1980). The language makers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1988). Murray, Moore and the myth. In Harris, R. (Ed.), Linguistic thought in England, 1914–1945 (pp. 1–26). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1990a). On redefining linguistics. In Davis, H. and Taylor, T. (Eds.), Redefining linguistics (pp. 18–52). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1990b). The dialect myth. In Edmondson, J. A., Feagin, C. and Mühlhäusler, P. (Eds.), Development and diversity: Language variation across time and space. (pp. 3–10). Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1997). From an integrational point of view. In Wolf, G. and Love, N. (Eds.), Linguistics inside out: Roy Harris and his critics (pp. 229–310). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. (1998a). Introduction to integrational linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1998b). The integrationist critique of orthodox linguistics. In Harris, R. and Wolf, G. (Eds.), Integrational linguistics: A first reader (pp. 15–26). Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. (2002). The role of the language myth in the Western cultural tradition. In Harris, R. (Ed.), The language myth in Western culture (pp. 1–24). Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (2004). Integrationism, language, mind and world. Language Sciences, 26, 727–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. (2009). After epistemology. Gamlingay: Brightpen.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. (1951). Structural linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. (1982). A grammar of English on mathematical principles. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. (1995). Ontology and social construction. Philosophical Topics, 23(2), 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauck, J. D. and Heurich, G. O. (2018). Language in the Amerindian imagination: An inquiry into linguistic natures. Language & Communication, 63, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, M. R. (2018). Transmodalities and transnational encounters: Fostering critical cosmopolitan relations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayman, E. with James, C./Tláa, G̱ooch and Wedge, J./Gooshú, Aan (2018). Future rivers of the Anthropocene or whose Anthropocene is it? Decolonising the Anthropocene. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 6(2), 77–92.Google Scholar
Henne-Ochoa, R., Elliot-Groves, E., Meek, B. and Rogoff, B. (2020). Pathways forward for indigenous language reclamation: Engaging indigenous epistemology and learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors. The Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 481–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermes, M., Engman, M., McKenzie, M. and McKenzie, J. (2022). Relationality and Ojibwemowin in forest walks: Learning from multimodal interaction about land and language. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2022.2059482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heurich, G. (2020). Broken words, furious wasps. How should we translate the sonic materiality of Araweté ritual singing. Journal de la Société des Américanistes, 106-1, 105–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, P. (2017). Ontological turn, the. In Stein, F., (Ed.), The open encyclopedia of anthropology. Facsimile of the first edition in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. http://doi.org/10.29164/17ontology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. (2002). ‘Expert rhetorics’ in advocacy for endangered languages: Who is listening, and what do they hear? Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 12(2), 119–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiratsuka, A. and Pennycook, A. (2020). Translingual family repertoires: ‘No, Morci is itaiitai panzita, amor’. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(9), 749–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (Eds.) (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (2011). Human–thing entanglement. Towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(1), 154–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, M., Pedersen, M. A. and Viveiros de Castro, E. (2014). The politics of ontology: Anthropological positions: Theorizing the contemporary. Fieldsights, 13 January. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions.Google Scholar
Holbraad, M. and Pedersen, M. A. (2017). The ontological turn: An anthropological exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollington, A. (2020). Jamaican postcolonial writing practices and metalinguistic discourses as a challenge to established norms and standards. In Deumert, A., Storch, A. and Shepherd, N. (Eds.), Colonial and decolonial linguistics: Knowledges and epistemes (pp. 225–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1998). Women talk too much. In Bauer, L. and Trudgill, P. (Eds.), Language myths (pp. 41–9). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Home gardeners (2023). Home gardeners become accidental citizen scientists for Wollemi Pine. www.csiro.au/en/news/all/articles/2023/july/wollemi-pine.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In Tomasello, M. (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 155–75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hountondji, P. (1977). Sur la “philosophie africaine”. Paris: Maspéro (African philosophy: Myth and reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Hovens, D. (2020). Workplace learning through human‐machine interaction in a transient multilingual blue‐collar work environment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 30(3), 369–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovens, D. (2021). Language policy and linguistic landscaping in a contemporary blue‑collar workplace in the Dutch–German borderland. Language Policy, 20, 645–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovens, D. (2023). Breakdowns and assemblages: Including machine-actants in sociolinguistic ethnographies of blue-collar work environments. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 27, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, J. (2021). Transhumanism: From ancestors to avatars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hultgren, A. K. (2011). ‘Building rapport’ with customers across the world: The global diffusion of a call centre speech style. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(1), 36–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (2014). The cultural ecosystem of human cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 27(1), 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, C. (1999). Linguistics and the Third Reich: Mother-tongue fascism, race and the science of language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hutton, C. (2002). The language myth and the race myth: Evil twins of modern identity politics? In Harris, R. (Ed.), The language myth in Western culture (pp. 118–38). Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Hutton, C. (2022). Can there be a politics of language? Reflections on language and metalanguage. In Antia, B. and Makoni, S. (Eds.), Southernizing sociolinguistics: Colonialism, racism, and patriarchy in language in the Global South (pp. 17–31). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, K. A. (2016). Waves of knowing: A seascape epistemology. Durham, CT: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2012). Towards an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 427–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobs, M. and Hüning, M. (2022). Scholars and their metaphors: On language making in linguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 274, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, J. (2018). The transformative limits of translanguaging. Language & Communication, 58, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, J. and Madsen, L. (2019). Fixity and fluidity in sociolinguistic theory and practice. In Jaspers, J. and Madsen, L. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on linguistic fixity and fluidity: Languagised lives (pp. 1–26). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, A. and Gonçalves, K. (2021). High culture at street level: Oslo’s Ibsen Sitat and the ethos of egalitarian nationalism. In Blackwood, R. and Røyneland, U. (Eds.), Spaces of multilingualism (pp. 135–64). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C. (Eds.) (2010). Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jenks, C. (2017). Race and ethnicity in English language teaching: Korea in focus. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. C. and Johnson, E. J. (2022). The language gap: Normalizing deficit ideologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, M. and Singh, I. (2005). Exploring language change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. N. (2008). Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(3), 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. N., Karrebæk, M. S., Madsen, L. M. and Møller, J. S. (2011). Polylanguaging in superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 23–37.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. (1997). The ‘Language Myth’ myth: Or, Roy Harris’s red herrings In Wolf, G. and Love, N. (Eds.), Linguistics inside out : Roy Harris and his critics (pp. 9–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J. E. (2006). Language and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. (2018). Language, mind and body: A conceptual history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. (2022). Afterword: The complementarity of multilingualist and 4T approaches. In Ayres-Bennett, W. and Fisher, L. (Eds.), Multilingualism and identity: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 365–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. and Newmeyer, F. (2012). All languages are equally complex: The rise and fall of a consensus. Historiographia Linguistica, 39(2/3), 341–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. and Pollard, J. (2012). Archaeological assemblages and practices of deposition. In Beaudry, M. and Hicks, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies (pp. 291–312). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. (2002). Preface. In Kaplan, R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. v–x). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karimzad, F. (2021). Multilingualism, chronotopes, and resolutions: Toward an analysis of the total sociolinguistic fact. Applied Linguistics, 42(5), 848–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, R. (1988). The wake of imagination. Minneapolis. MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kell, C. and Budach, G. (2024). Materialities and ontologies: Thinking multilingualism through language materiality, post-humanism and new materialism. In Makoe, P., McKinney, C. and Zavala, V. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism (2nd edition, pp. 79–95). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., Kogan, V. and Zhang, C. (2023). Collecting big data through citizen science: Gamification and game-based approaches to data collection in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, E. (2015). Anthropology of ontologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 311–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2015). Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice, Applied Linguistics, 36, 454–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2021). Language as symbolic power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P. V. (2000). Regimenting languages: Language ideological perspectives. In Kroskrity, P. V. (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, politics and identities (pp. 1–34). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P. (2018). On recognizing persistence in the Indigenous language ideologies of multilingualism in two Native American Communities. Language & Communication, 62, 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, P. (2021). Language ideological assemblages within linguistic anthropology. In Burkette, A. and Warhol, T. (Eds.), Crossing borders, making connections: Interdisciplinarity in linguistics (pp. 129–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kusters, A. (2021). Introduction: The semiotic repertoire: Assemblages and evaluation of resources. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(2), 183–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, A. and Lucas, C. (2022). Emergence and evolutions: Introducing sign language sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26, 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, A. and Sahasrabudhe, S. (2018). Local and academic language ideologies on the difference between gesture and sign. Language & Communication, 60, 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, A., Spotti, M., Swanwick, R. and Tapio, E. (2017a). Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 219–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, A., De Meulder, M. and O’Brien, D. (2017b). Innovations in Deaf Studies: Critically mapping the field. In Kusters, A., De Meulder, M. and O’Brien, D. (Eds.), Innovations in Deaf Studies: The role of Deaf scholars (pp. 1–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kwaymullina, A. (2016). Research, ethics and Indigenous peoples: An Australian Indigenous perspective on three threshold considerations for respectful engagement. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 12(4), 437–49.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, G. (2020). Towards a green applied linguistics: Human–sea turtle semiotic assemblages in Hawai‘i. Applied Linguistics, 41(6), 922–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, G. (2024). Multispecies discourse analysis. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, G. and Sharma, B. (2021). Introduction: Tourism spaces at the nexus of language and materiality. Applied Linguistics Review, 12(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, P. (2023a). From silence to silencing? Contradictions and tensions in language revitalization. Applied Linguistics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, P. (2023b). The South in the North: Colonization and decolonization of the mind. In Deumert, A. and Makoni, S. (Eds.), From Southern Theory to decolonizing sociolinguistics: Voices, questions and alternatives (pp. 39–55). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, S. and Johnson, J. (2016). The agency of place: Toward a more-than-human geographical self. GeoHumanities, 2(1), 149–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2016.1157003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor–network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2015). Telling friends from foes in the time of the Anthropocene. In Hamilton, C., Gemenne, F. and Bonneuil, C. (Eds.), The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis (pp. 145–55). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, E. and Makoni, S. (2022). Sociolinguistic protests for decolonial future making: Toward centering languaging in the ‘streets’. Bandung: Journal of the Global South, 9, 300–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. W. (2022). Locating translingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. W. and Dovchin, S. (2020). Introduction: Negotiating innovation and ordinariness. In Lee, J. W. and Dovchin, S. (Eds.), Translinguistics: Negotiating innovation and ordinariness (pp. 1–5). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, B. and Bozalek, V. (2018). Towards a slow scholarship of teaching and learning in the South. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(8), 981–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, W. (2017). Producing language reclamation by decolonising ‘language’. In Leonard, W. and De Korne, H. (Eds.), Language documentation and description (Vol. 14, pp. 15–36). London: EL Publishing.Google Scholar
Leonard, W. Y. (2020a). Musings on Native American language reclamation and sociolinguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2020(263), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, W. (2020b). Learning by observing and pitching in in the context of sleeping language reclamation. The Modern Language Journal, 104, 494–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, W. (2021). Toward an anti-racist linguistic anthropology: An Indigenous response to white supremacy. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 31(2), 218–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. (1996). Relativity in spatial conception and description. In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 177–202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (2018). A critique of the principle of error correction as a theory of social change. Language in Society, 47(3), 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Li (2011). Moment Analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1222–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Li (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linguistics Roadshow, The (2023). https://lingroadshow.com/ (last accessed 31 July 2023).Google Scholar
López-Gopar, M., Sughrua, W., Cirilo, C. G. and Hernández, L. C. (2023). ‘We tell the river, “Give me back my piece of soul and I give you back your pebble”’: The Onto-epistemology and language of the Ayuk Ethnic Group in Oaxaca, Mexico. In Makoni, S., Kaiper-Marquez, A. and Mokwena, L. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and the Global South/s (pp. 110–20). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lorente, B. (2017). Scripts of servitude: Language, labor migration and transnational domestic work. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Love, N. (1998). The linguistic thought of J R Firth. In Harris, R. (Ed.), Linguistic thought in England, 1914–1945 (pp. 148–64). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Love, N. (2017). On languaging and languages. Language Sciences, 61, 113–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, A. (2013). Regrounding critical literacy: Representation, facts, and reality. In Hawkins, M. (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies: Socially situated views and perspectives (pp. 136–48). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1981). Language and linguistics. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, D. (2019). Rupturing the yoke of colonialism in foreign language education. In Macedo, D. (Ed.), Decolonzing foreign language education: The misteaching of English and other imperial languages (pp. 1–49). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J. (2017). A multilingual perspective on translanguaging. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 167–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacSwan, J. (2020). Translanguaging, language ontology, and civil rights. World Englishes, 39, 321–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacSwan, J. (2022a). Introduction: Deconstructivism – a reader’s guide. In MacSwan, J. (Ed.), Multilingual perspectives on translanguaging. (pp. 17–55). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J. (2022b). Codeswitching, translanguaging and bilingual grammar. In MacSwan, J. (Ed.), Multilingual perspectives on translanguaging (pp. 90–130). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Maher, J. (2021). Metroethnicity, naming and mocknolect: New horizons in Japanese sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makalela, L. (2018). Introduction: Shifting lenses. In Makalela, L. (Ed.), Shifting lenses: Multilanguaging, decolonisation and education in the Global South (pp. 1–18). Cape Town: CASAS.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. In Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 1–41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A. (2024). Looking at multilingualisms from the Global South. In Makoe, P., McKinney, C. and Zavala, V. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism (2nd edition, pp. 17–30). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, L. (1986). ‘Eskimo words for snow’: A case study in the genesis and decay of an anthropological example. American Anthropologist, 88(2), 418–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1867). Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Oekonomie. Hamburg: Verlag von Otto Meisner.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1972 [1845]). Theses on Feuerbach. In Tucker, R. C. (Ed.), The Marx– Engels reader (pp. 107–9). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
May, S. (2014). Disciplinary divides, knowledge construction, and the multilingual turn. In May, S. (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 7–31). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
May, S. (2022). Afterword: The multilingual turn, superdiversity and translanguaging – the rush from heterodoxy to orthodoxy. In MacSwan, J. (Ed.), Multilingual perspectives on translanguaging (pp. 333–44). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. (2001). Issues in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and critical urbanism. City, 15(2), 204–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, J. (2020). Approaching from many angles: Seeing the connections for our languages to live. The Modern Language Journal, 104, 501–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J. (2014). The language hoax: Why the world looks the same in any language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meek, B. (2010). We are our language: An ethnogrpahy of language revitalization in a Northern Athabaskan Community. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Meek, B. (2015). The politics of language endangerment. In Bonvillan, N. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 447–62). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merlan, F. (2009). Indigeneity: Global and local. Current Anthropology, 50(3), 303–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mika, C. (2016). Worlded object and its presentation: A Māori philosophy of language. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 12(2), 165–75.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. (1991). Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation (2nd edition). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Møller, J. S. (2008). Polylingual performance among Turkish-Danes in late modern Copenhagen. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(3), 217–36.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P. (2012). Going for wombat – transformations in Wirangu and the Scotdesco Community on the far west coast of South Australia. Oceania, 82(1), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, E. and Kusters, A. (2021). Deaf cosmopolitanism: Calibrating as a moral process. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1889561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motha, S. (2014). Race and empire in English language teaching. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Muecke, S. (2004). Ancient and modern: Time, culture and Indigenous philosophy. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. (2008). Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. (2016). A cost-and-benefit approach to language loss. In Filipović, L. and Pütz, M. (Eds.), Endangered languages and languages in danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights (pp. 115–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. (2017). Language vitality: The weak theoretical underpinnings of what can be an exciting research area. Language, 93(4), e202–e223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. (2020). Decolonial linguistics as paradigm shift: A commentary. In Deumert, A., Storch, A. and Shepherd, N. (Eds.), Colonial and decolonial linguistics: Knowledges and epistemes (pp. 289–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P. (1995). Metaphors others live by. Language & Communication, 15(3), 281–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MyGov (2023). https://my.gov.au/ (last accessed 14 December 2023).Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2007). Disciplining the savages: Savaging the disciplines. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Nakata, M., Nakata, V., Keech, S. and Bolt, R. (2012). Decolonial goals and pedagogies for Indigenous studies. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 120–40.Google Scholar
Nandy, A. (1983). The intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nascimento, G. (2023). On (dis)inventing language as a zone of non-being: Black teachers in ELT and linguistic racism in Brazil. In Friedrich, P. (Ed.), The anti-racism linguist (pp. 44–63). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndhlovu, F. (2018). Language, vernacular discourse and nationalisms: Uncovering the myths of transnational worlds. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndhlovu, F. (2021). Decolonising sociolinguistics research: Methodological turn-around next? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 267–268, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndhlovu, F. and Makalela, L. (2021). Decolonising multilingualism in Africa: Recentering silenced voices from the Global South. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Neale, M. (2021). First Knowledges: An introduction. In Pascoe, B. and Gammage, B. (Eds.), Country: Future fire, future farming (First Knowledges Volume 2, pp. 11–14). Melbourne: Thames and Hudson Australia.Google Scholar
Neale, M. and Kelly, L. (2020). Songlines: The power and the promise (First Knowledges Volume 1). Melbourne: Thames and Hudson Australia.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (1986). The politics of linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (1988). Linguistic theory in America (2nd edition). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, S. and McCarty, T. (2022). To ‘think in a different way’ – a relational paradigm for Indigenous language rights. In MacSwan, J. (Ed.), Multilingual perspectives on translanguaging (pp. 229–47). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Noon, K. and de Napoli, K. (2022). Astronomy: Sky country. (First Knowledges Volume 4). Melbourne: Thames and Hudson Australia.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (2017). Deaf-led Deaf Studies: Using kaupapa Māori principles to guide the development of Deaf research practices. In Kusters, A., De Meulder, M. and O’Brien, D. (Eds.), Innovations in Deaf Studies: The role of Deaf scholars (pp. 57–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Regan, J. (2016). Intercultural communication and the possibility of English as a lingua franca. In Holmes, P. and Dervin, F. (Eds.), The cultural and intercultural dimensions of English as a lingua franca (pp. 203–17). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Oda, M. and Takada, T. (2005). English language teaching in Japan. In Braine, G. (Ed.), Teaching English to the world: History, curriculum and practice (pp. 93–101). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Oliveira, G. S and Oliveira, M. B. (2022). Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867166.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2014). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In May, S. (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education (pp. 32–53). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2018). Ontologies of language, second language acquisition, and world Englishes. World Englishes, 37, 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2019). SLA and the study of equitable multilingualism. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R., García, O. and Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R., García, O. and Reid, W. (2018). A translanguaging view of the linguistic system of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics Review, 10(4), 625–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2018-0020.Google Scholar
Otsuji, E. and Pennycook, A. (2018). The translingual advantage: Metrolingual student repertoires. In Choi, J. and Ollerhead, S (Eds.), Plurilingualism in teaching and learning: Complexities across contexts (pp. 71–88). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Otsuji, E. and Pennycook, A. (2024). Reassembling meaning while shopping. In Rasmussen, G. and Van Leeuwen, T., (Eds.), Multimodality and social interaction in online and offline shopping (pp. 85–103). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pablé, A. (2019a). Is a general non-ethnocentric theory of human communication possible? An integrationist approach. Lingua, 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pablé, A. (2019b). In what sense is integrational theory lay-oriented? Notes on Harrisian core concepts and explanatory terminology. Language Sciences, 72, 150–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pablé, A. (2021). Three critical perspectives on the ontology of ‘language’. In Makoni, S., Verity, D. P. and Kaiper-Marquez, A. (Eds.), Integrational linguistics and philosophy of language in the Global South (pp. 30–47). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pablé, A. (2022). Linguistics for the apocalypse. Language & Communication, 86, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, S. (2022). Interview. The Saturday Paper, 5–11 February, p. 26.Google Scholar
Pascoe, B. and Gammage, B. (2021). Country: Future fire, future farming. (First Knowledges Volume 2). Melbourne: Thames and Hudson Australia.Google Scholar
Patel, S. (2021). Sociology’s encounter with the decolonial: The problematique of indigenous vs that of coloniality, extraversion and colonial modernity. Current Sociology, 69(3), 372–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1985). Actions speak louder than words: Paralanguage, communication and education. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 259–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2006). Uma lingüîstica aplicada transgressiva. In Moita Lopes, L. P. (Ed.), Por uma lingüîstica aplicada indisciplinar (pp. 67–84). Sao Paulo: Parabola.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2016). Mobile times, mobile terms: The trans-super-poly-metro movement. In Coupland, N. (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp. 201–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2018a). Posthumanist applied linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2018b). Repertoires, registers, and linguistic diversity. In Creese, A. and Blackledge, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and superdiversity (pp. 3–15). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2018c). Applied linguistics as epistemic assemblage. AILA Review, 31, 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2018d). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 445–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw016.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2019a). Linguistic landscapes and semiotic assemblages. In Pütz, M. and Mundt, N. (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape (pp. 75–88). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2019b). The landscape returns the gaze: Bikescapes and the new economies. Linguistic Landscape, 5(3), 217–47.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2020a). Translingual entanglements of English. World Englishes, 39(2), 222–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2020b). Pushing the ontological boundaries of English. In Hall, C. J. and Wicaksono, R. (Eds.),Ontologies of English: Reconceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 355–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2021a). Critical applied linguistics: A critical reintroduction (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2021b). Entanglements of English. In Rubdy, R. and Tupas, R. (Eds.), Bloomsbury world Englishes: Volume 2: Ideologies (pp. 9–26). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2021c). Reassembling linguistics: Semiotic and epistemic assemblages. In Burkette, A. and Warhol, T. (Eds.), Crossing borders, making connections: Interdisciplinarity in linguistics (pp. 111–28). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2022a). Critical applied linguistics in the 2020s. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 19(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2030232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2022b). Street art assemblages. Social Semiotics, 32(4), 563–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2114731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2023a). Toward the total semiotic fact. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 19(4), 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2023b). From Douglas Firs to giant cuttlefish: Reimagining language learning. In Deumert, A. and Makoni, S. (Eds.), From Southern Theory to decolonizing sociolinguistics: Voices, questions and alternatives (pp. 71–89). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (In press). Language activism and decolonialism: From extractivist to emergent politics. In Cutler, C., Røyneland, U. and Vrzic, Z. (Eds.), Language activism: The role of scholars in linguistic reform and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Makoni, S. (2020). Innovations and challenges in applied linguistics from the Global South. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2014). Metrolingual multitasking and spatial repertoires: ‘Pizza mo two minutes coming’. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2015). Metrolingualism: Language in the city. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2016). Lingoing, language labels and metrolingual practices. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(3), 259–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2017). Fish, phone cards and semiotic assemblages in two Bangladeshi shops in Sydney and Tokyo. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 434–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2019). Mundane metrolingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2022). Metrolingual practices and distributed identities: People, places, things and languages. In Ayres-Bennett, W. and Fisher, L. (Eds.), Multilingualism and identity: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 69–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perley, B. (2012). Zombie linguistics: Experts, endangered languages and the curse of undead voices. Anthropological Forum, 22(2), 133–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. (2006). Agencement/assemblage. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), 108–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (2017). The ontological turn: Taking different worlds seriously. Social Analysis, 61(2), 134–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietikäinen, S. (2021). Powered by assemblage: Language for multiplicity. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 267–268, 235–40.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. London: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, E. (2016). Geontologies: A requiem to late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Preston, D. R. (1993). The use of folk linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 181–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. (1996). Whaddayaknow? The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language Awareness, 5, 40–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (1989). The great Eskimo vocabulary hoax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, 275–81.Google Scholar
Ramberg, B. and Røyneland, U. (In press). Language activism and social justice – why languages still matter. In Cutler, C., Røyneland, U. and Vrzic, Z. (Eds.), Language activism: The role of scholars in linguistic reform and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rambukwella, H. (2019). On hybridity, the politics of knowledge production and critical language studies. Language, Culture and Society, 1(1), 126–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, A. R. (2012). The politics of perspectivism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 481–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B. (1997). Retuning in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2022). Feeling, thinking and talking: How the embodied brain shapes everyday communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, J. and Flores, N. (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language and Society, 46(5), 621–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumsey, A. (2018). The sociocultural dynamics of indigenous multilingualism in northwestern Australia. Language & Communication, 62(B), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rymes, B. (2014). Communicating beyond language: Everyday encounters with diversity. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rymes, B. (2020). How we talk about language: Exploring citizen sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G. (1980). Schools of linguistics. London: Hutchison.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G. (2017). The linguistics delusion. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Sanches de Oliveira, G. and Bullock Oliveira, M. (2022). Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means. Frontiers of Psychology, 13, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santana, C. (2016). What is language? Ergo, 3(19), 501–23.Google Scholar
Santos, B. de S. (2002). A critica da razāo indolente: contra o desperdício da experiência. Sāo Paulo: Cortês.Google Scholar
Santos, B. de S. (2004). A critique of lazy reason: Against the waste of experience. In Wallerstein, E. (Ed.), The modern world-system in the long durée (pp. 157–97). London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Santos, B. de S. (2012). Public sphere and epistemologies of the south. Africa Development, 37(1), 43–67.Google Scholar
Santos, B. de S. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, G. (2018). Le Kov. CD. London: Heavenly Recordings.Google Scholar
Savransky, M. (2017). A decolonial imagination: Sociology, anthropology and the politics of reality. Sociology, 51(1), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, D. (2023). Using language to help people, or using people to help language? A capabilities framework of language policy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller-Schwaner, I. and Kirkpatrick, A. (2020). What is English in the light of lingua franca usage? In Hall, C. J. and Wicaksono, R. (Eds.),Ontologies of English. Reconceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 233–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In Schatzki, T., Cetina, K. Knorr and von Savigny, E. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Schmid, H-J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. (2018). Methodological nationalism in Linguistics. Language Sciences, 76, 1–13.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sealey, A. (2014). Cats and categories – reply to Teubert. Language and Dialogue, 4(2), 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seargeant, P. (2010). The historical ontology of language. Language Sciences, 32, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seargeant, P. (2023). The future of language: How technology, politics and utopianism are transforming the way we communicate. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Severo, C. and Makoni, S. (2020). Using lusitanization and creolization as frameworks to analyse historical and contemporary Cape Verde language policy and planning. In Deumert, A., Storch, A. and Shepherd, N. (Eds.), Colonial and decolonial linguistics: Knowledges and epistemes (pp. 62–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankar, S. and Cavanaugh, J. R. (2017). Toward a theory of language materiality: An introduction. In Cavanaugh, J. R. and Shankar, S. (Eds.), Language and materiality: Ethnographic and theoretical explorations (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, B. K. (2021). The scarf, language, and other semiotic assemblages in the formation of a new Chinatown. Applied Linguistics Review, 12(1), 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2015). LL research as expanding language and language policy. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1–2), 152–71.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1985). Language and the culture of gender. In Mertz, E. and Parmentier, R. (Eds.), Semiotic mediation, (pp. 219–59). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, L. B. (2014). Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), 1–25.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education – or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd edition). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (1999). Chomsky: Ideas and ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stebbins, T. (2014). Finding the languages we go looking for. In Austin, P. and Sallabank, J. (Eds.), Endangered languages: Beliefs and ideologies in language documentation and revitalisation (pp. 293–312). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stebbins, T., Eira, K. and Couzens, V. (2018). Living languages and new approaches to language revitalisation research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steffensen, S. V. (2012). Beyond mind: An extended ecology of languaging. In Cowley, S. (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 185–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stone, C. and Köhring, J. (2021). Sensory ecologies and semiotic assemblages during British Sign Language interpreted weather forecasts. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(2), 226–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1867149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straaijer, R. (2016). Attitudes to prescriptivism: An introduction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(3), 233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Styres, S. D. (2011). Land as first teacher: A philosophical journeying. Reflective Practice, 12(6), 717–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Styres, S. (2019). Literacies of land: Decolonizing narratives, storying, and literature. In Smith, L. T., Tuck, E. and Yang, W. K. (Eds.), Indigenous and decolonizing studies in education (pp. 24–37). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sundberg, J. (2013). Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sveinsdóttir, Á. (2015). Social construction. Philosophy Compass, 10(12), 884–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, B. A. (2018). The dynamics of citizen sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 22, 137–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, B. and Goodchild, S. (2023). Citizen (socio)linguistics: What we can learn from engaging young people as language researchers. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, 314.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, M. and Shohamy, E. (2023). Developing multilingual education policies: Theory, research, practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor & Francis. (2023). https://newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/taylor-francis-clarifies-the-responsible-use-of-ai-tools-in-academic-content-creation/.Google Scholar
Tegmark, M. (2018). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Teubert, W. (2013). Was there a cat in the garden? Knowledge between discourse and the monadic self. Language and Dialogue, 3(2), 273–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, P. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, N. (1991). Entangled objects: Exchange, material culture, and colonialism in the Pacific. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. (2019). Sea people: The puzzle of Polynesia. London: William Collins.Google Scholar
Thorne, S., Hellerman, J. and Jakonen, T. (2021). Rewilding language education: Emergent assemblages and entangled actions. The Modern Language Journal, 105, 106–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrift, N. (2007). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2014). Disciplining youth: Language ideologies and new technologies. In Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (Eds.), The discourse reader (3rd edition, pp. 481–96). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Todd, Z. (2016). An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toohey, K. (2019). The onto-epistemologies of New Materialism: Implications for applied linguistics pedagogies and research. Applied Linguistics, 40, 937–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toohey, K., Dagenais, D., Fodor, A. et al. (2015). ‘That sounds so cooool’: Entanglements of children, digital tools, and literacy practices. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 461–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topa, W. (Four Arrows) and Narvaez, D. (Eds.) (2022). Restoring the kinship worldview: Indigenous voices introduce 28 precepts for rebalancing life on earth. Huichin, unceded Ohlone land, aka Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1998). The meanings of words should not be allowed to vary or change. In Bauer, L. and Trudgill, P. (Eds.), Language myths (pp. 1–8). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, E. and Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
Tynan, L. (2021). What is relationality? Indigenous knowledges, practices and responsibilities with kin. Cultural Geographies, 28(4), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740211029287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underhill, J. (2011). Creating worldviews: Ideology, metaphor & language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dooren, T. (2019). The wake of crows: Living and dying in shared worlds. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, J. (2018). ‘We talk in saltwater words’: Dimensionalisation of dialectal variation in multilingual Arnhem Land. Language and Communication, 62, 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, J. and Singer, R. (2018). Indigenous multilingualisms past and present. Language & Communication, 62, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2014). Cannibal metaphysics. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal.Google Scholar
Vivieros de Castro, E. (2015). The relative native: Essays on Indigenous conceptual worlds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walcott, R. (2018). Against social justice and the limits of diversity: Or Black people and freedom. In Tuck, E. and Yang, K. W. (Eds.), Toward what justice? Describing diverse dreams of justice in education (pp. 85–100). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, T. (2022). Machines behaving badly: The morality of AI. Melbourne: La Trobe University Press & Black Inc.Google Scholar
Wardaugh, R. (1986). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Watkins, M. (1999). Policing the text: Structuralism’s stranglehold on Australian language and literacy pedagogy. Language and Education, 13(2), 118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European tour!). DIES: Decolonization, Indigeneity, Education and Society, 2(1), 20–34.Google Scholar
Watts, R. (2011). Language myths and the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. (2016). The art of failure in translating a Navajo poem. Journal de la Société des américanistes, 102(1), 9–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2021). Posthumanist world Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wicaksono, R. and Hall, C. (2020). Using ontologies of English. In Hall, C. and Wicaksono, R. (Eds.), Ontologies of English: Conceptualising the language for learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 368–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. (1996). Secondary education: Teaching in the bilingual situation. In Williams, C., Lewis, G. and Baker, C. (Eds.), The language policy: Taking stock (pp. 39–78). Llangefni: CAI.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1992). Sociolinguistics: A sociological critique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, Q. (2021). Into collabs: Public applied linguistics and hip hop language technicians. Applied Linguistics, 42(6), 1125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willinsky, J. (1994). Empire of words: The reign of the OED. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Winchester, S. (1998). The surgeon of Crowthorne: A tale of murder, madness and the love of words (retitled The professor and the madman: A tale of murder, insanity, and the making of the Oxford English Dictionary in the United States and Canada). New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Windle, J., Heugh, K., French, M., Armitage, J. and Nascimento dos Santos, G. (2023). Southern multilingual moves in education: Agency, citizenship, and reciprocity. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2023.2244099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yunkaporta, T. (2019). Sand talk: How Indigenous thinking can save the world. Melbourne: Text Publishing.Google Scholar
Zhou, F. (2020). Models of the human in twentieth-century linguistic theories: System, order, creativity. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Zhu, Wei, Li and Jankowicz-Pytel, D. (2020). Translanguaging and embodied teaching and learning: Lessons from a multilingual karate club in London. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1599811.Google Scholar
Hua, Zhu, Otsuji, E. and Pennycook, A. (2017). Multilingual, multisensory and multimodal repertoires in corner shops, streets and markets: Introduction, Social Semiotics, 27(4), 383–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×