Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:00:28.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Environmental Impact Assessment Law and Land Use: A Comparative Analysis of Recent Trends in the Nigerian and U.S. Oil and Gas Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Bibobra Bello Orubebe
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law Delta State University Abraka, Nigeria
Nathalie J. Chalifour
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Patricia Kameri-Mbote
Affiliation:
University of Nairobi
Lin Heng Lye
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
John R. Nolon
Affiliation:
Pace University, New York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The topic of environmental impact assessment (EIA) has generated a lot of interest among scholars, researchers, policymakers, politicians, advocates, and citizens. This perhaps accounts for the concern governments now attach to the topic. Most governments have reacted to this growing environmental concern by enacting statutory legislation regulating the environment, particularly on the subject of EIA and sustainable land use. In the United States, the main environmental statute is the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. The general principles, regulations, practice, and procedures for EIA are contained in the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), NEPA regulations, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines. In Nigeria, the main environmental statute is the Federal Environmental Protection Agency Act (FEPAA). The rules, practices, and procedures for the EIA process are governed by FEPA and the object-specific legislation – the Environmental Impact Assessment Act.

Whereas NEPA sets forth significant substantive national environmental goals, its mandate provides for procedural action forcing national environmental policy–based general principles for EIA in the United States to ensure a fully informed and well-considered decision. Such a decision is not necessarily a decision the judges of the Courts of Appeal or of other courts would have reached had they been members of the decision-making unit of the agency. In the case of Nigeria, FEPAA took a “command and control” approach providing excruciating details of a national adjectival environmental protection objective.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×