References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 December 2018
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Korean Syntax and Semantics , pp. 269 - 284Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Abusch, Dorit. 1988. Sequence of tense, intensionality and scope. In Borer, Hagit (ed.), WCCFL 7. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information for the Stanford Linguistics Association 1–14.Google Scholar
Adger, David. 2003. Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, Hee-Don, and Cho, Sungeun. 2006. Layered nominal structures: Implications for caseless nominals. Korean Journal of Linguistics 31, 165–185.Google Scholar
Ahn, Hee-Don and Cho, Sungeun 2007. Non-case-marked wh-phrases and left- dislocation. In Omaki, Akira, Ortega-Santos, Ivan, Sprouse, Jon, and Wagers, Matt (eds.), University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 16. College Park, MD: UMWPiL, 111–141.Google Scholar
Ahn, Sung-Ho. 1990. Korean quantification and Universal Grammar. PhD dissertation. University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Ahn, Yoonja. 1995. The aspectual and temporal system of Korean: From the perspective of the two-component theory of aspect. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21, 435–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammann, Andreas, and Auwera, Johan van der. 2002. Korean modality: Asymmetries between possibility and necessity. In Ahn, H.-D. and Kim, N. (eds.), Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Conference on Korean Linguistics. Seoul: Kyungjin Publishing, 43–56.Google Scholar
An, Duk-Ho. 1980. Semantics of Korean tense markers. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
An, Duk-Ho. 2014. Genitive case in Korean and its implications for noun phrase structure. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 23, 361–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoun, Joseph, Hornstein, Norbert, and Sportiche, Dominique. 1981. Aspects of wide scope quantification. Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 67–95.Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph, and Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1993. Wh-elements in situ: Syntax or LF?. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 199–238.Google Scholar
Baek, Judy Yoo-Kyung. 1998. Negation and object shift in early child Korean. In Sauerland, Uli and Percus, Orin (eds.), The Interpretive Tract. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL, 73–86.Google Scholar
Baker, Carl L. 1970. Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6, 197–219.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 373–415.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2015. Case: Its Principles and Its Parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, Jon, and Cooper, Robin. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14, 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Sigrid, and Kim, Shin-Sook. 1997. On wh- and operator scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6, 339–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, and Rizzi, Luigi. 1988. Psych-verbs and theta-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Michael, and Partee, Barbara. 1972. Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1989. Anaphoric Agr. In Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Safir, Kenneth (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 69–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Susan E. 1995. Centering attention in discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, 137–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Susan E., Friedman, Marilyn Walker, and Pollard, Carl J.. 1987. A centering approach to pronouns. In Proceedings of 25th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Stanford, 155–162.Google Scholar
Brennan, Virginia. 1993. Root and epistemic modal auxiliary verbs in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere, and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Ceong, Hailey Hyekyeong. 2016. Korean hearsay constructions and speech act phrases. In Hracs, Lindsay (ed.), Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Ottawa: Canadian Linguistic Association. Actes du congrès annuel de l'Association canadienne de linguistique. Proceedings of the 2016 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Nichols, Johanna (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Encoding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Chang, Lisa. 1997. Wh-in-situ phenomena in French. MA thesis. University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Chen, Hsiang-Yun. 2009. Logophoricity and ziji. In Xiao, Yun (ed.), Proceedings of the 21st North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-21), vol. 2. Smithfield, RI: Bryant University, 464–481.Google Scholar
Chen, Hsiang-Yun. 2010. Logophoric ziji in DRT. In Clemens, L. E. and Liu, C.-M. L. (eds.), The 18th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics (IACL-18), vol. 2, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1–17.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989. Anaphora and attitudes de se. In Bartsch, R., van Benthem, J., and van Emde Boas, P. (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expression. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1–31.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Mi-Hui. 1994. On the orientation problem in Korean “caki” binding and the typology of X reflexive binding. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 19, 165–183.Google Scholar
Choi, Jaewoong, and Lee, Minhaeng. 1999. Focus. In Kang, Beommo et al. (eds.), Formal Semantics and the Description of Korean. Seoul: Hanshin (in Korean), 157–205.Google Scholar
Choi, Young-Sik. 1999. Negation, its scope and NPI licensing in Korean. In Daly, Rebecca and Riehl, Anastasia (eds.), ESCOL '99. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University/CLC Publications, 25–36.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001a. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001b. Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 20, 1–28.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Chan, and Kim, Jong-Bok. 2003. Differences between externally and internally headed relative clause constructions. In Kim, Jong-Bok (ed.), On-line Proceedings of HPSG 2002, 3–25.Google Scholar
Chung, Inkie. 2007. Suppletive negation in Korean and Distributed Morphology. Lingua 117, 95–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Kyung-Sook. 2005. Space in tense: The interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality and speech act in Korean. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Chung, Kyung-Sook. 2007. Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean. Natural Language Semantics 15, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra, and Timberlake, Alan. 1985. Tense, aspect, and mood. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202–258.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10, 141–177.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella, and Huang, C.-T. James. 2001. Long-distance reflexives: The state of the art. In Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella, and Huang, C.-T. James (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 33: Long-Distance Reflexives, volume 33. New York: Academic Press, xiii–xlvii.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella, and Sung, Li-May. 1990. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 1–22.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, and Sung, Li-May. 1994. Head movement and long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 25, 355–406.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1993. Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs. In Pustejovsky, James (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culy, Christopher. 1994. Aspects of logophoric marking. Linguistics 32, 1055–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83–101.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1988. Bare plural subjects and stage/individual contrast. In Krifka, Manfred (ed.), Genericity in Natural Language. University of Tübingen, 107–154.Google Scholar
Doron, Edit, and Heycock, Caroline. 1999. Filling and licensing multiple specifiers. In Adger, D., Pintzuk, S., Plunkett, B., and Tsoulas, G. (eds.), Specifiers: Minimalist Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1982. Tenses, time adverbs, and compositional semantic theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 23–55.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, and Harley, Heidi. 2007. Causation, obligation, and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38, 197–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny, and David, Pesetsky. 2005. Cyclic Linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (special issue on Object Shift, ed. Katalin É. Kiss), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert, Lee, Young-Suk and Rambow, Owen. 1996. Scrambling, reconstruction and subject binding. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 21, 67–106.Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn, Clifton, Charles, and Randall, Janet. 1983. Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension. Cognition 13, 187–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B., and Youn, Cheong. 1988. Korean psych constructions: Advancement or retreat? In MacLeod, Lynn, Larson, Gary, and Brentari, Diane (eds.), Papers from the 24th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part One: The General Session, 155–175.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B., and Youn, Cheong. 1999. Case stacking and focus in Korean. In Kuno, S. et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VIII. Seoul: Hanshin, 325–339.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1967/1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, J., and Stokhof, M.. 1984. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers, Joint PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Department of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. 1991. ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., and Sidner, Candace L.. 1986. Attentions, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175–204.Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., Joshi, Aravind K., and Weinstein, Scott. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 2, 203–225.Google Scholar
Gunlogson, Christine. 2003. True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ha, Iljoo. 2007. NPI licensing in Korean modal constructions. In McGloin, Naomi and Mori, Junko (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 15. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 312–323.Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine. 2010. On the event relativity of modal auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics 18, 79–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrom, Paul. 1997. Scope interaction and phrasal movement in Korean negation. In Kuno, S. et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VII. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University/Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1992. Basic word order in two “free word order” languages. In Payne, Doris (ed.), Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth, and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, Kenneth et al. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 53–110.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye. 1998. Asymmetry in the interpretation of -(n)un in Korean. In Akatsuka, Noriko et al. (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 7. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1–15.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye. 2001. Force, negation and imperatives. The Linguistic Review 18, 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye. 2011. Imperatives. In Maienborn, Claudia, von Heusinger, Klaus, and Portner, Paul (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, HSK series. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1785–1804.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye. 2013. On the syntax of relative clauses in Korean. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 58, 319–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, and Kim, Jong-Bok. 2004. Are there ‘‘double relative clauses’’ in Korean? Linguistic Inquiry 35, 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, and Lee, Chungmin. 2002. On negative imperatives in Korean. Linguistic Inquiry 38, 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, Lidz, Jeffrey, and Musolino, Julien. 2007. V-Raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry 38, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, and Storoshenko, Dennis Ryan. 2009. A bound-variable analysis of the Korean anaphor caki: Evidence from corpus. In Current Issues in Unity and Diversity of Languages: Collection of the Papers Selected from the 18th International Congress of Linguistics. Seoul: The Linguistic Society of Korea.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye and Storoshenko, Dennis Ryan 2012. Semantic binding of long distance anaphor caki in Korean. Language 88, 764–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Jong-Im. 1992. Syntactic movement analysis of Korean relativization. Language Research 28, 335–357.Google Scholar
Han, Na-Rae. 2006. Korean zero pronouns: Analysis and resolution. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2002. Possession and the double object construction. Yearbook of Linguistic Variation 2, 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Marin. 2001. Language Typology and Language Universals. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croon Helm.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusettes at Amherst.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1983. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Barlow, M., Flickinger, D., and Wiegand, N. (eds.), WCCFL 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 114–125.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene, and Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James, and May, Robert. 1981. Questions, quantifiers, and crossing. The Linguistic Review 1, 41–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, Philip, and Sag, Ivan. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86, 366–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, Ki-Sun. 1991. Argument selection and case marking in Korean. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hong, Sun Ho. 2004. On the lack of syntactic effects in Korean wh-questions. Linguistics Association of Korea Journal 12, 43–57.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Thompson, Sandra. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56, 251–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, Nunes, Jairo, and Grohmann, Kleanthes K.. 2014. Understanding Minimalism: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531–574.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, and Liu, Luther. 2001. Logophoricity, attitudes and ziji at the interface. In Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella, and Huang, C.-T. James (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 33: Long-Distance Reflexives. New York: Academic Press, 141–195.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, and Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1991. The local nature of the long-distance reflexives in Chinese. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.), Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, S. 1996. “Fakes?” Paper presented at the 19th GLOW Colloquium, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
Izvorski, Roumyana. 1997. The present perfect as an epistemic modal. Proceedings of SALT 7, 222–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press/Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenks, Peter. 2015. Two kinds of definites in numeral classifier languages. Proceedings of SALT 25, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Yeun-Jin, and Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2004. Decomposing ditransitive verbs. Proceedings of SICGG, 101–120.Google Scholar
Just, Marcel, and Carpenter, Patricia. 1992. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99, 122–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, Beom-Mo. 1988. Unbounded reflexives. Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 415–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Beom-Mo. 1994. Plurality and other semantic aspects of common nouns in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Beom-Mo. 1998. Three kinds of Korean reflexives: A corpus linguistic investigation of grammar and usage. Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC12), 10–19.Google Scholar
Kang, Beom-Mo. 2002. Categories and meanings of Korean floating quantifiers – with some reference to Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Dae-Hyang. 2005 Scrambling in Universal Grammar:An analysis of scrambling as optional movement in Korean and other languages. PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kang, Young-Se. 1986. Korean Syntax and Universal Grammar. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri, and Stanley, Peters. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Oh, Choon-Kyu and Dinneen, David A. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press, 1–56.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J., and Postal, Paul M.. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2000. Parameters and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehler, Andrew. 2002. Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kendall, Sue Ann, and Yoon, James H.. 1986. Morphosyntactic interaction with pragmatics and sentence particles. In Farley, Anne M. et al. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession of Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 54–66.Google Scholar
Kim, Boyoung, and Goodall, Grant. 2016. Islands and non-islands in native and heritage Korean. Frontiers in Psychology 7, article 134, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Christina. 2005. Order and meaning: Numeral classifiers and specificity in Korean. In John Alderete, Chung-hye Han, and Alexei Kochetov (eds.), WCCFL 24. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 218–226.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, Ilkyu. 2013. Rethinking ‘‘island effects’’ in Korean relativization. Language Sciences 38, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Ji-Hye, and Yoon, James H.. 2009. Long-distance bound local anaphors in Korean: An empirical study of the Korean anaphor caki-casin. Lingua 119, 733–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok. 1995. On the existence of NegP in Korean. In Kuno, S. et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VI. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Linguistics, 267–282.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok. 2013. Floated numeral classifiers in Korean: A non-derivational, functional account. Lingua 133, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok, and Sells, Peter. 2007. Korean honorification: A kind of expressive meaning. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16, 303–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Kyumin. 2016. A unified analysis of existentials and psych-constructions in Korean as pseudo-transitives. Studia Linguistica 70, 109–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Mi-Kyung. 2003. Zero vs. overt NPs in Korean discourse: A Centering analysis. Korean Journal of Linguistics 28. 1, 29–49.Google Scholar
Kim, Min-Joo. 2009. E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27, 345–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Nam-Kil. 2000. Reportative evidential in Korean. Korean Linguistics, 10, 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Soo-Yeon. 2000. Acceptability and preference in the interpretation of anaphors. Linguistics 38, 315–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Soo-Yeon, Ok, Sungsoo, and Yoon, Jeong-Me. 2016. A processing approach to complex NP island effects in Korean. Journal of Universal Language 17, 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Taeho. 2008. Subject and object markings in conversational Korean. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Kim, Yong-Beom. 2002. Relevancy in internally headed relative clauses in Korean. Lingua 112, 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Young-Joo. 1990. The syntax and semantics of Korean case: The interaction between lexical and syntactic levels of representation. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kim, Youngsun. 2002. A phase-based approach to ECM across CP in Korean. In Language, Information, and Computation: Proceedings of The 16th Pacific Asia Conference. Seoul: The Korean Society of Language and Information, 205–216.Google Scholar
Kiss, É. Katalin. 1995. (ed.) Discourse Configurational Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge into [Spec,CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23, 867–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Heejeong. 2007. Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization. Linguistic Inquiry 38, 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Heejeong, and Oh, Eunjeong. 2010. A hybrid approach to floating quantifiers: Experimental evidence. In Sohn, Ho-Min, Cook, Haruko M., O'Grady, William, Serafim, Leon, and Cheon, Sang-Yee (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 19. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 171–184.Google Scholar
Koizumi, Masatoshi. 2000. String vacuous overt verb-raising. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9, 227–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda. 2005. Korean (and Japanese) morphology from a syntactic perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 36, 601–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda, and Sportiche, Dominique. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85, 211–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda, and Anna, Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal Complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Modality. In von Stechow, A. and Wunderlich, D. (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter, 639–650.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Carlson, G. and Pelletier, F. (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 125–175.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogy between pronouns and tenses. In Strolovitch, D. and Lawson, A. (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 8. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University, 92–110.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In Carlson, G. and Pelletier, F. (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 398–411.Google Scholar
Kubota, Yusuke, and Lee, Jungmee. 2015. The coordinate structure constraint as a discourse-oriented principle: Further evidence from Japanese and Korean. Language 91, 642–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1976. Subject raising. In Shibatani, M. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 5: Japanese Generative Grammar. New York: Academic Press, 17–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung. 2004. Syntactic and semantic mismatches in the Korean ko-construction. In Schmeiser, B., Chand, V., Kelleher, A., and Rodriguez, A. (eds.), WCCFL 23. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 101–114.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung. 2008. Processing of syntactic and anaphoric gap-filler dependencies in Korean: Evidence from self-paced reading time, ERP and eye-tracking experiments. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Kwon, Song-Nim, and Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2004. Number from a syntactic perspective: Why plural marking looks “truer” in French than in Korean. In Bonami, O. and Hofherr, P. Cabredo (eds.), Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 5, 133–158.Google Scholar
Kwon, Song-Nim and Zribi-Hertz, Anne 2008. Differential function marking, case, and information structure: Evidence from Korean. Language 84, 258–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, William. 1977. Some problems with tense in PTQ. Texas Linguistic Forum 6, 89–102.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1994. Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong. In Harvey, M. and Santelmann, L. (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 4I, Ithaca, NY, 220–229.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1999. Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? Linguistic Typology 3, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chungmin. 1973. Structure of modality in speech act. In Modern Korean Grammar [In Korean]. Taegu, Korea: Kyemyung University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin. 1987. Temporal expressions in Korean. In Verschueren, J. and Bertuccelli-Papi, M. (eds.), The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected Papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 405–447.Google Scholar
Lee, EunHee. 2007. Dynamic and stative information in temporal reasoning: Interpretation of Korean past markers in narrative discourse. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, EunHee. 2008. Argument structure and event structure: The case of Korean imperfective constructions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17, 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, EunHee. 2017. Case alternation in temporal adverbials in Korean. Lingua 189/190, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Eunsuk. 2007. A semantic restriction on scrambling in Korean. LSO Working Papers in Linguistics 7: Proceedings of WIGL, 109–123.Google Scholar
Lee, Gunsoo. 2001. A minimalist account of the long-distance anaphor kucasin. Studies in Generative Grammar 11, 383–404.Google Scholar
Lee, Hanjung. 2006. Parallel optimization in case systems: Evidence from case ellipsis in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hanjung. 2010. Explaining variation in Korean case ellipsis: Economy versus iconicity. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19, 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hanjung. 2016. Usage probability and subject–object asymmetries in Korean case ellipsis: Experiments with subject case ellipsis. Journal of Linguistics 52, 70–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1991. Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 2015. Modality. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ik-Hwan, and Lee, Minhaeng. 2000. Anaphora resolution and discourse structure: A controlled information packaging approach. Language and Information 4, Seoul: Korean Society for Language and Information, 67–82.Google Scholar
Lee, Iksop, and Ramsey, Robert. 2000. The Korean Language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Jeong-Shik. 1993. Case minimality: Case alternation in the Korean ECM constructions. In Kuno, S. et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics V. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 317–328.Google Scholar
Lee, Jungmee. 2011. The Korean evidential -te: A modal analysis. In Bonami, O. and Cabredo Hofherr, P. (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, 287–311.Google Scholar
Lee, Keedong. 1993. A Korean Grammar on Semantic-Pragmatic Principles. Seoul: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Lee, Mijung. 2004. Resultative constructions in Korean. PhD dissertation, University of Hawaii, Manoa.Google Scholar
Lee, Sun-Hee, and Byron, Donna K.. 2004. Semantic resolution of zero and pronoun anaphors in Korean. Proceedings of the Discourse Anaphora and Reference Resolution Conference (DAARC2004), 103–108.Google Scholar
Lee, Sun-Hee, and Song, Jae-young. 2012. Annotating particle realization and ellipsis in Korean. Proceedings of the 6th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, 175–183.Google Scholar
Lee, Yong-hun, and Park, Yeonkyung. 2015. Complex-NP islands in Korean: An experimental approach. Proceedings of the 29th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 240–249.Google Scholar
Levin, Theodore. 2017. Successive-cyclic case assignment: Korean nominative–nominative case-stacking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 35, 447–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Yen-Hui A. 1990. Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice theoretic approach. In Bäuerle, R., Schwarze, C., and von Stechow, A. (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: de Gruyer, 302–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukoff, Fred, and Ki-Shim, Nam. 1982. Constructions in -nikka and -ese as logical formulations. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 559–583.Google Scholar
Madigan, Sean. 2008. Obligatory split control into exhortative complements in Korean. Linguistic Inquiry 39, 493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Emar. 2017. The pragmatics of attraction: Explaining unquotation in direct and free indirect discourse. In Saka, Paul and Johnson, Michael (eds.), The Semantics and Pragmatics of Quotation. Berlin: Springer, 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L., Haspelmath, Martin, and Comrie, Bernard. 2010. Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1989. Adverbials and structural case in Korean. In S. Kuno et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 297–308.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1993. Of nominative and accusative: The hierarchical assignment of grammatical case in Finnish. In Holmberg, Anders and Nikanne, Urpo (eds.), Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 51–76.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Kim, Soowon. 1992. Case assignment in the inalienable possession construction in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In Westphal, G. F., Ao, B., and Chae, H.-R. (eds.), Proceedings of ESCOL '91. Eastern States Conference On Linguistics. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 234–253.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1954. Korean Morphophonemics. Baltimore, MD: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa, Davis, Henry, and Rullmann, Hotze. 2007. Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St’át'imcets. In Craenebroeck, J. V. (ed.), The Linguistic Variation Yearbook 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 201–254.Google Scholar
McCoard, Robert. 1978. The English Perfect: Tense-Choice and Pragmatic Inferences. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
McCready, Eric, and Ogata, Norry. 2007. Evidentiality, modality and probability. Linguistics and Philosophy 30, 147–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, G. L. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–30.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2001. The EPP, scrambling and wh-in-situ. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 293–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2003. A-movement scrambling and options without optionality. In Karimi, Simin (ed.), Word Order and Scrambling. Oxford: Blackwell, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2012. Agreements that occur mainly in the main clause. In Aelbrecht, Lobke, Haegeman, Liliane, and Nye, Rachel (eds.), Main Clause Phenomena. New Horizons. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Na, Younghee, and Huck, G. J.. 1993. On the status of certain island violations in Korean. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 181–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, Ki-Shim. 1978. Kuke mwunpep-euy sicey mwuncey-ey kwanhan yenkwu [A Study of Korean Tense]. Seoul: Tower Press.Google Scholar
Nauze, Fabrice D. 2008. Modality in typological perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Kunio, and Cho, Eun. 1998. Predicate cleft constructions in Japanese and Korean: The role of dummy verbs in TP/VP-preposing. In Akatsuka, N., Hoji, H., Iwasaki, S., Sohn, S.-O., and Strauss, S. (eds.), Japanese and Korean Linguistics 7. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 463–479.Google Scholar
No, Young-Kyoon. 1991. A Centering approach to the *[CASE] [TOPIC] restriction in Korean. Linguistics 29, 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noh, Eun Ju. 2009. The Korean conditional markers myen and tamyen: Epistemicity vs. modes of language use. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, William. 1987. The interpretation of Korean anaphora: The role and representation of grammatical relations. Language 63, 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, William, 1989. Categories and Case: The Sentence Structure of Korean. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Oh, Sang-Suk. 2005. A multi-level semantic approach to Korean causal conjunctive suffixes -(e)se and -(u)nikka. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10, 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Sun-Young. 2003. The Korean verbal suffix -ess-: A diachronic account of its multiple uses. Journal of Pragmatics 35, 1181–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshima, David Y. 2004. Zibun revisited: Empathy, logophoricity and binding. University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics 23 (Proceedings of the 20th Northwest Linguistics Conference), 175–190.Google Scholar
Oshima, David Y. 2007. On empathic and logophoric binding. Research on Language and Computation 5, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otani, Kazuyo, and Whitman, John. 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 345–358.Google Scholar
Pak, Miok, Portner, Paul, and Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2008. Agreement in promissive, imperative, and exhortative clauses. Korean Linguistics 14, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Haihua. 2000. Why the blocking effect? In Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella, and Huang, C.-T. James (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 33: Long Distance Reflexives. New York: Academic Press, 279–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Bum-Sik. 2009. Island sensitivity in ellipsis and its implications for movement. Studies in Generative Grammar 19, 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Myung-Kwan. 1998. Negation and the placement of verb in Korean. Language Research 34, 709–736.Google Scholar
Park, Sang Doh, and Whitman, John. 2003. Direct movement passives in Japanese and Korean. In McClure, W. (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 12. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 307–321.Google Scholar
Park, Yugyeong. 2013. A unified approach to Korean causal connective nikka. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19. 1, Article 18.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1989. The progressive in English: Events, states and processes. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings from the 4th Regional Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 157–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective Binding. In Reuland, Eric J. and ter Meulen, Alice G. B. (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 98–129.Google Scholar
Pires, Acrisio, and Taylor, Heather Lee. 2009. The syntax of wh-in-situ and common ground. In Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 43. 2, 201–215.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer, and Rosengren, Inger. 1997. On the subject of imperatives: A minimalist account of the imperative clause. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1, 177–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul. 1998. The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74, 760–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2007. Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics 15, 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potsdam, Eric. 1998. Syntactic Issues in the English Imperative. New York: Garland Publishing. (New edition published 2017 by Routledge.)Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher, and Kawahara, Shigeto. 2004. Japanese honorifics as emotive definite descriptions. In Watanabe, K. and Young, R. B. (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, 235–254.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 233–255.Google Scholar
Prior, Arthur. 1967. Past, Present, and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam. 1999. On case assignment and adjuncts as complements. In Webelhuth, G., Koenig, J.-P., and Kathol, A. (eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 231–245.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In Butt, Miriam and Geuder, Wilhelm (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 97–134.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1998. Wh-in-situ in the framework of the minimalist program. Natural Language Semantics 6, 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28, 229–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya, and Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 657–720.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in Language: Interactions and Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, María-Luisa, and Terzi, Arhonto. 1995. Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood. Journal of Linguistics 31, 301–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craig. 2012. Information structure: Toward an integrated theory of formal pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roh, Ji-Eun, and Lee, Jong Hyeok. 2003. An empirical study for generating zero pronoun in Korean based on cost-based centering model. Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Workshop 2003, 90–97.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryu, B. R. 2001. Centering and zero anaphora in the Korean discourse. MS thesis, Seoul National University.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. 2001. On Korean “Case Stacking”: The varied functions of the particles ka and lul. The Linguistic Review 18, 193–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzchild, Roger. 1999. GIVENness, Avoid F and other constraints on the placement of focus. Natural Language Semantics 7, 141–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1995. Korean and Japanese morphology from a lexical perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 277–325.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1999. Dative subject constructions twenty-two years later. In Goldberg, A. (ed.), Studies in the Linguistic Sciences: Forum Lectures from the 1999 Linguistic Institute. Urbana: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois, 45–76.Google Scholar
Shim, Ji Young, and Ihsane, Tabea. 2005. Facts: The interplay between the matrix predicate and its clausal complement. Newcastle and Northumbria Working Papers in Linguistics 21, 130–144.Google Scholar
Shin, Jee-Youn. 2005. Wh-constructions in Korean: A lexical account. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 25, 48–57.Google Scholar
Shin, Keun Young. 2017. Partitive descriptions in Korean. Glossa 2 (1): 5, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna, and Bakker, D.. 2008. Case and alternative strategies: word order and agreement marking. In Malchukov, A. and Spencer, A. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 290–303.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min, 1980. Theme-prominence in Korean. Korean Linguistics: Journal of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics 2, 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Keun-Won. 1995. Negative polarity items, scope, and economy. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock 1993. Cognition, affect, and topicality of the causal particle -nikka in Korean. In Clancey, Patricia M. (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 2. Stanford: CSLI, 82–97.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock 1995. Tense and Aspect in Korean. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock, and Park, Mee-Jeong. 2003. Indirect quotations in Korean conversations. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 11, 105–118.Google Scholar
Son, Minjeong. 2006. Atypical argument structure of the hi passive in Korean. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 335–348.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung (1997). The so-called plural copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus. Journal of Pragmatics 27, 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Seok Choong. 1982. On interpreting the scope of negation in Korean. Language Research 18, 197–215.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2001. Constraints on null pronouns. In Legendre, Geraldine et al. (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret [Peggy], and Tenney, Carol L.. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Sciullo, A.-M. Di (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 315–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 425–449.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1998. Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Munitz, Milton K. and Unger, Peter K. (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy: Essays. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. In Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 315–332.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 701–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, Lesley. 2005. Switch Reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Susan. 2005. Cognitive realization markers in Korean: A discourse-pragmatic study of the sentence ending particles -kwun, -ney and -tela. Language Sciences 27, 437–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, Eugenia. 2005. The Nominal Phrase in Korean: The role of D in a “determiner-less” language. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 25, 10–19.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabo, Zoltan Gendler. 2004. On the progressive and the perfective. Nous 38, 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi. 1995. [Focus]F restricts scope: Quantifier in VP ellipsis. In Simons, Mandy and Galloway, Teresa (eds.), SALT V. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University, 328–345.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi. 2007. Pragmatics of LF intervention effects: Japanese and Korean wh-interrogatives. Journal of Pragmatics 39, 1570–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1994. On nominal islands and LF extraction in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12, 121–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsoulas, George. 2004. On a binding-theoretic argument for base generation of long distance scrambling. York Papers in Linguistics (Series 2) 1, 223–236.Google Scholar
Ura, Hiroyuki. 1999. Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Geldereen, Elly. 2013. Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics and Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, M.A., Iida, M., and Cotes, S.. 1994. Japanese discourse and the process of centering. Computational Linguistics 20, 193–232.Google Scholar
Wang, Yingying, and Pan, Haihua. 2015. Empathy and Chinese long distance reflexive ziji – remarks on Giorgi (2006, 2007). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33, 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, A. 1992. Wh-in-Situ, Subjacency and Chain Formation (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT, 255–291.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen, and Lee, Yae-Sheik. 1996. The domain of direct case assignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14, 629–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K., and Manzini, M.. 1987. Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E. (eds.), Parameter Setting. Dordrecht: Reidel, 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 1999. Modal verbs must be raising verbs. In Bird, S., Carnie, A., Haugen, J., and Norquest, P. (eds), WCCFL 18. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 599–612.Google Scholar
Wyman, Adrian T. 1996. The expression of modality in Korean. PhD dissertation, University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Xue, Ping, Pollard, Carl, and Sag, Ivan. 1994. A new perspective on Chinese ziji. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 432–447.Google Scholar
Yang, In-Seok. 1972. Korean Syntax: Case marking, Delimiters, Complementation and Relativization. Seoul: Paek Hap Sa.Google Scholar
Yeo, Seungju. 2008. Morphosyntax of predicates and syntactic categories in Korean. Lingua 118, 332–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeom, Jae-Il. 2005. A comparative study of modalities of -keyss and -ul kes in Korean. Language and Information 9. 2, 1–22. [in Korean]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira, Maling, Joan, and Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. Case in tiers. Language 63, 217–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, James Hye-Suk. 1994. Korean verbal inflection and checking theory. In Harley, Heidi and Phillips, Colin (eds.), The Morphology-Syntax Connection (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22). Cambridge, MA: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 251–270.Google Scholar
Yoon, James Hye-Suk. 1995. Nominal, verbal and cross-categorial affixation in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4, 325–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, James Hye-Suk. 1996. Ambiguity of government and the Chain Condition. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14, 105–162.Google Scholar
Yoon, James Hye-Suk. 1997. Coordination (a)symmetries. In Kuno, S. et al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VII. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 3–30.Google Scholar
Yoon, James Hye Suk. 2004. Non-nominative (major) subjects and case-stacking in Korean. In Bhaskararao, P. and Subbarao, K. V. (eds.), Non-nominative Subjects, vol. 2, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 265–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, James Hye Suk. 2007. Raising major arguments in Korean and Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 35, 615–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Jeong-Me. 1991. The syntax of A-chains: A typological study of ECM and scrambling. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Yoon, Jeong-Me. 2012. Wh-island effects in Korean wh-in-situ questions: Degradedness or misinterpretation? Korean Journal of Linguistics 37. 2, 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Pak, Miok, and Portner, Paul. 2012. A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30, 1231–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1989. Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language 65, 695–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar